Biden-Harris 0 comments on President Biden Signed H.R. 5009

President Biden Signed H.R. 5009

December 23, 2024: The White House posted: “Statement from President Joe Biden on H.R. 5009, Servicemember Quality of Life Improvement and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025”

Today, I have signed into law H.R. 5009, the “Servicemember Quality of Life Improvement and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025.” (the “Act”). This Act authorizes fiscal year appropriations principally for the Department of Defense, Department of Energy national security programs, Department of State, Department of Homeland Security, and the Intelligence Community.


This bill provides vital benefits for military personnel and their families and includes critical authorities to support our country’s national defense, foreign affairs, and homeland security. While I am pleased to support the critical objectives of the Act, I note that certain provisions of the Act raise concerns.

A number of provisions of the Act may, in certain circumstances, interfere with the exercise of my constitutional authority to articulate the positions of the United States in international negotiations or fora (e.g., sections 735(a), 1214, 1221, 1333, 5121(b), 7204, and 7803(a)).

I recognize that “[I]t is not for the President alone to determine the whole content of the Nation’s foreign policy” (Zivotosfky v. Kerry) and will make every effort to oppose many of the objectives in these provisions. Nevertheless, I will not treat them as limiting my constitutional discretion to articulate the views of the United State before international organizations and with foreign governments.

Certain provisions of the Act, including sections 129, 809, 1067, 1069, 1078, 1225, 1229, 1707, 6308, 7303(b)(2)-(3), 7502, and 7505, would require the President and other officials to submit certificates, reports, notifications or plans to the Congress that (1) may in the ordinary course, include highly sensitive classified information, including information that could reveal critical intelligence sources or military operational plans or (2) could implicate executive branch confidentially interests. In addition, section 354(4) raises constitutional concerns to the extent that it purports to compel the provision of certain documents subject to executive branch confidential interests — including attorney-client privileged information.

The Constitution vests the President with the authority to prevent the disclosure of such highly sensitive information in order to discharge his responsibility to protect the national security. At the same time, congressional committees have legitimate needs to perform vital oversight and other legislative functions with respect to national security and military matters.

Accordingly, it has been the common practice of the executive branch to comply with statutory reporting requirements in a way that satisfies congressional with due regard for the protection from unauthorized disclosure of classified information relating to sensitive intelligence sources and methods or other exceptionally sensitive matters, as well as to preserve the confidentiality of internal executive branch deliberations, particularly those with respect to decisions bearing on the Nation’s national security. I believe the Congress shares this understanding, and my Administration will presume that it is incorporated into statutory reporting requirements of the kind at issue in the Act.

Division A, title X, subtitle D, section 1043 of the Act continues to bar the use of funds appropriated to the Department of Defense to transfer Guantánamo Bay detainees to the custody of effective control of certain foreign countries. Division A, title X, subtitle D, section 1041 likewise would continue to prohibit the use of such funds to transfer Guantánamo Bay detainees into the United States.

It is the longstanding position of the executive branch that these provisions unduly impair the ability of the executive branch to determine when and where to prosecute Guantánamo Bay detainees and where to send them upon release.

In some circumstances, these provisions could make it difficult to comply with the final judgement of a court that has directed the real of a detainee on writ of habeas corpus, including by constraining the flexibility of the executive branch with respect to is engagement in delicate negotiations with foreign countries over the potential transfer of detainees. I urge the Congress to eliminate these restrictions as soon as possible.

My Administration strongly opposes Division A, title VII, subtitle A, section 708 of the Act, which inhibits the Department of Defense’s ability to treat all persons equally under the law, no matter their gender identity. By prohibiting the use of appropriated funds, the Department of Defense will be compelled to contravene clinical practice guidelines and clinical recommendations.

The provision targets a group based on that group’s gender identity and interferes with parents’ roles to determine the best care for their children. This section undermines our all-volunteer military’s ability to recruit and retain the finest fighting force the world has ever know by denying health care coverage to thousands of our service members’ children. No service member should have to decide between their family’s health care access and their call to serve our nation.

JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR.

Biden-Harris 0 comments on Another Government Shutdown 2024

Another Government Shutdown 2024

photo of U.S. White House by Louis Velazquez on Unsplash

December 18, 2024: NPR reported: “Congress flirts with a holiday shutdown as GOP objects to bipartisan spending bill” It was written by Barbara Sprunt and Claudia Grisales.

Republican lawmakers are scrambling to avoid a government shutdown days before Christmas after President-elect Donald Trump and his close advisers came out against a bipartisan spending bill meant to fund the government until March 14.


Government funding runs out at the end of the day on Friday and congressional leaders had hoped to pass a roughly 1,500 page bipartisan spending bill that includes other year-end priorities like farm subsidies, disaster aid and a pay raise for lawmakers. But GOP lawmakers and Trump advisers like Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy on Wednesday pushed House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., to back out of the bipartisan deal.

Musk spent the day campaigning against the bill on social media, personally thanking lawmakers who said they won’t support it, and calling on Congress not to pass any bills until Trump takes office.

Ramaswamy shared similar messages on social media platforms and other influential conservative voices like Heritage Action, also came out against the bill.

Even members of the House Appropriations Committee, like Rep. Steve Womack, R-Ark., were venting frustrations.

“In late September, when we passed this last [spending bill], we said we needed to do it because we were running out if time, and here we are at the end of the next deadline, and we’re still running out of time,” Womack said on Tuesday before the final text was released. “The American people are as tire of this as most appropriations.”

The widespread frustration among Republicans could spell trouble for Johnson as he works to retain the gavel for the next session of Congress.

Republican Leaders defend the legislation

Johnson told “Fox and Friends” Wednesday that with this bill, “we are clearing the decks and we are setting up for Trump to come roaring back with the American-first agenda.”

Sen. John Thune, R-S.D., the incoming Senate majority leader, told reporters in the Capitol the bill reflected bipartisan talks that are necessary with Democrats still in power.

“Anytime you are negotiating with a Democratic Senate and a Democratic White House, there are things you don’t like,” Thune said. “At the end of the day, we’ve got some stuff wrapped up hopefully at the end of this year so we’re not dealing with it all next year.”

The spending bill would fund the government at current levels until March 14. It also includes other unfinished business including: roughly $100 billion in federal aid for communities damaged by natural disasters like hurricanes Milton and Helene and wildfires in Maui; money to rebuild the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore, which collapsed in March, and a pay raise for lawmakers.

House Republicans have also criticized Johnson for giving them little time to review the bill and forgoing a promise to stick to a 72-hour review period for members to assess legislation. Some have floated withholding votes for Johnson on Jan. 3, when the House convenes to elect a speaker.

“It is really a laughingstock. I mean, this [spending bill] is a joke,” Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley told reporters. “And by the way, who it’s worst for is Donald Trump. It only goes until March. So March 14th, we’re going to do this all over again, right in the middle of Trump’s [first] 100 days.”

Democrats stand behind the partisan deal

The legislation released Tuesday was the result of bipartisan negotiations and Democrats said Wednesday that they were unwilling to back away from that pact.

“A deal is a deal. Republicans should keep their word,” White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said in a statement.

House Democrats delivered a sentiment in a brief statement to reporters in the Capitol. House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries said Republicans will “own any harm” if a shutdown happens at the end of the week.

“An agreement is an agreement,” Jeffries said. “It was bipartisan and there is nothing more to say.”


December 18, 2024: The White House posted: “Statement from Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre on Republicans Threatening a Government Shutdown”

Republicans need to stop playing politics with this bipartisan agreement or they will hurt hardworking Americans and create instability across the country. President-elect Trump and Vice President-elect Vance ordered Republicans to shut down the government and they are threatening to do just that — while undermining communities recording from disasters, farmers and ranchers, and community health centers. Triggering a damaging government shutdown would hurt families who are gathering to meet with their loved ones and endanger the basic services Americans from veterans to Social Security recipients rely on. A deal is a deal. Republicans should keep their word.


December 19, 2024: The White House posted “Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre on Republicans’ Billionaire Giveaway”

Republicans are doing the bidding of their billionaire benefactors at the expense of hardworking Americans. Republicans are breaking their word to support a bipartisan agreement that would lower prescribe drug costs and make it harder to offshore jobs to China — and instead putting forward a bill that paves the way for tax breaks for billionaires whole cutting critical programs working families count on, from Social Security to Head Start. President Biden supports the bipartisan agreement to keep the government open, help communities recovering from disasters, and lower costs — not this giveaway for billionaires that Republicans are proposing at the 11th hour.


December 19, 2024: The White House posted “Statement from White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre on President Biden’s Travel to Italy”

President Joseph R. Biden will travel to Rome, Italy, from January 9 to 12 to meet separately with His Holiness Pope Francis, President of Italy Sergio Mattarella, and Prime Minister of Italy Georgia Meloni. On January 10, President Biden will have an audience with the Pope and discuss efforts to advance peace around the world. He will also meet with Italy’s leaders to highlight the strength of the U.S.-Italy relationship, thank Prime Minister Meloni for her strong leadership of the G7 over the past year, and discuss important challenges facing the world.

December 19, 2024: “Readout of President Biden’s Call with His Holiness Pope Francis”

Today, President Joseph R. Biden, Jr. spoke with His Holiness Pope Francis to discuss efforts to advance peace around the world during the holiday season. The President thanked the Pope for his continued advocacy to alleviate global suffering, including his work to advance human rights and protect religious freedoms. President Biden also graciously accepted His Holiness Pope Francis’s invitation to visit the Vatican next month.


December 20, 2024: The White House reported: “Statement from Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre on the Proposed Legislation to Fund the Government”

A government shutdown heading into the holidays would mean service members and air traffic controllers go to work without pay, essential government services for hardworking Americans would be paused, and economic disruption would occur.

Following an order by President-elect Trump yesterday, Republicans walked away from a bipartisan deal and threatened to shut down the government at the 11th hour in order to pave the way to provide tax breaks for billionaires. This revised legislation does not do that.

While it does not include everything we sought, it includes disaster relief that the President requested for the communities recovering from the storm, eliminates the accelerated pathway to a tax cut for billionaires, and would ensure that the government can continue to operate at full capacity.

President Biden supports moving this legislation forward and ensuring that the vital services the government provides for hardworking Americans — from issuing Social Security checks to processing benefits for veterans — can continue as well to grant assistance for communities that were impacted by devastating hurricanes.


December 20, 2024: The White House reported: “Press Briefing by Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre”

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: Good afternoon, everyone.

Q: Hello.

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: A few things at the top.

So, as we announced yesterday, the president will travel to Rome, Italy, in early January to meet separately with His Holiness Pope Francis; president of Italy, Sergio Marttarella [Mattarella]; and prime minister of Italy Meleni — Meloni, pardon me — Giorgia Meloni.

The president will have an audience with the pole to discuss efforts to advance peace around the world. And during his meetings with Italian leaders, he will highlight the strengths of the U.S.-Italy relationship, thank Prime Minister Meloni for her strong leadership of the G7 over the past year, and discuss important challenges facing the world.

We will provide more information in the days to come.

And next, earlier this week, as you all saw, the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation announced a $1 billion financial initiative to support cons- conservation of the Ecuadorian Amazon.

This is a result of the president’s recent trip to the Amazon and a continuation of the administration’s efforts to support innovative ways to address climate change through sustainable growth and development without burdening countries facing financial constraints.

Switching gears just for a second here. Today, President Biden announced student debt cancellation for another 55,000 public service — public service workers, bringing the total number in- — of individuals who have been approved for student debt relief under his administration to nearly 5 million people.

The pe- — the people approved for debts cancelation today include teachers, nurses, service members, law enforcement officials, and other public service workers who have dedicated their lives to giving back to their communities and who are finally earning the relief they are entitled to under the law.

And finally, yesterday U.S. Customs and Border Protection published their November 2024 data, which shows that since President Biden’s — announced new executive actions to secure the border on June 4th, unlawful border crossing have dropped by more than 60 percent. That’s the lowest levels in four and a half years.

The Biden-Harris administration has implemented effective and balanced approach to secure our border and make our immigration system more fair and just.

With that, Colleen, what you got?

Q: Thanks, Karine. So, I wondered if the president has spoken to any lawmakers personally about the potential for a shutdown.

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: So, let me say this — and I know you’ve seen our statements coming from — from here this week about this particular issue. And we’ll just continue to reiterate that Republicans blew this deal. They did. And they need to fix this, period. They have to.

Republican needs to stop playing politics with a government shutdown. And they are doing the bidding — they’re doing the bil — bidding of they billionaire friends — that’s what we’re seeing — at the expense of hardworking Americans.

And just to quote you something that we saw today, and I’m sure you all saw from the poach- — Punchbowl News, which is, and I quote, “This has been an absolute disastrous week for the speaker; the president-elect, Donald Trump; and Republicans on — on Capitol Hill.”

This is a mess that they created, and they need to fix this.

On your question, the president — I can confirm, just moments ago, the president was able to connect with Leader Schumer and Leader Jeffries. And — and also, just to add, that the present does indeed get regular updates. He has been getting red — regular updates from his team. His team has been in touch with members — congressional members from both sides of the aisle. And certainly, he will continue to stay updated.

Q: Has there been any communication between the president or the administration and the incoming administration on this?

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: I think the pres- — I think we have to be really clear here, and that is, this is a mess that Speaker — Speaker Johnson created. It is his mess to fix. There was a deal on the table. They wa– a bipartisan deal. A bipartisan deal. In this day and age, they were able to come up with a bipartisan deal.

And, you know, that agreement, Speaker Johnson needs to stick to. He needs to hold his commitment to that agreement. And so, they have to fix this. This is their — this is their mess that they created, and they need to fix it.

And let’s not forget, we’re ta- — not just — when we talk about keeping the government opening — open, we’re talking about providing fu- — funds for disasters — disaster recovery efforts, loweri — to lower costs of prescription drugs. That’s what we’re talking about.

And the impact of this would hurt our veterans and would hurt vulnerable Americans across the country. That’s what we’re talking about. And Republicans need to do their job, and they need to uphold their side of the deal here.

Go ahead, Selina.

Q: Thanks, Karine. Why hasn’t President Biden said anything in the public about this? Don’t the American people deserve to know why millions of federal workers could enter this holiday period without a paycheck?

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: Well, Americans need to know that Republicans are getting in the way her and they are the ones who created this mess. That’s the reality. That’s the fact.

And the president — and let me just take a step back. We — this is not the first time we’ve been here, and the president has had this approach before. He understands how Congress works. He’s been around for some time. He understand what strategy works here to get this done.

So, this is not — this is not the first time that we’re — I’m being asked this question about the president and his outreach. I just mentioned he made two calls. He was in touch — he was in touch with the leader — the Democratic leaders of both the House and the Senate, Schumer and Jeffries. So — and his team is continuing to have that conversation.

But tis is the mess that was created by Speaker Johnson. He needs to fix this. That’s what the American people need to be very clear about — very clear.

There was a bipartisan agreement, and he’s not holding up his side of the bargain here.

Q: Right. We hear that message from you, but why aren’t we hearing that directly from the president? Why haven’t we seen or heard from President Biden himself?

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: This is something — this is a strategy that we have done many times before. Not the first time. And this is for Republicans in Congress — in the House, specifically — to fix. They created this mess.

There was a bipartisan agreement. There was. There was a bipartisan agreement —

Q: So, the president doesn’t feel the need to come in front of cameras and speak to the American people?

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: There was a bipartisan agreement. There was a bipartisan agreement.

And so, what we want to do and what we want to — what the president wants to make sure we do is — he stands to — ready to help get a bipartisan deal through. That’s what he wants to see.

And, you know, this is something that Republicans should own here. What they tried to jam at the eleventh hour doesn’t reflect and — what the deal — what that bipartisan deal that they came up with — obviously with Democrats. And, you know, they’re showing — Republicans are showing a disregard for the American public — people.

Q: And, just lastly, some leading Democrats are calling Elon Musk “President Musk”, or “Copresident Musk.” What is the White House’s and President Biden’s reaction to this labeling of Elon Musk and whether or not House Republicans are listening more to this billionaire than the president-elect?

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: What I can say is congressional Republicans, at the direction — and you all know this; you all reported this — of President Trump and Elon Musk are, you know, trying to pave the way — what they’re doing is trying to pave. the way for $5 trillion to nat- — to our national debt. That’s what this decision does.

I mean, you’re talking about with — cuts for billionaires, slashing Social Security, slashing Medicare, slashing Head Start.

Congressional Republicans did what they did because of what the president-elect said and what Elon Musk said. That’s the reality. You guys all reported this. That’s why we are where we are today.

So, this is for Speaker Johnson to fix. This is the mess that he created. He needs to fix this.

Again, a bipartisan agreement. There is a bipartisan agreement.

Go ahead.

Q: Thanks, Karine. Would the president support a four-bill strategy that we’ve seen discussed today, which would separate a clean CR from a Farm Bill extension and disaster aid and a debt limit increase?

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: I’m not going to get into hypotheticals.

What I can say is there is a bi- — I’m going to get very repetitive here, because it is true and it needs to be said. There is a bipartisan agreement. There’s a deal that was agreed upon, and that’s what they need to move forward with.

And when I mean “they,” I mean the Republicans in Congress. They need to move forward with that deal. That’s what they said w- — the deal that was agreed upon, that’s what they said they would move forward with. The speaker said that, and he’s not holding up his side of the bargain. He’s not. His side of the deal, he is not holding up.

Q: Any response to President-elect Trump’s statements this morning that “This is a Biden problem, but if Republicans can help solve it, they will”? I imagine you’ll repeat some of what you just said, but un response to that —

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: Congressional Republicans made their decision because of what the president-elect said — as there direction — the direction of the president-elect and the r- — direction of Elon Musk.

There was a bipartisan deal on the table. They were moving forward. The speaker agreed to do this — to move forward with the bipartisan deal. And they stopped that because of what the president-elect said and what Elon Musk said. They wanted to clear a way for their billionaire friends — a tax cut — $5 trillion — $5 trillion to the national debt with tax cuts to billionaires — for billionaires.

So, that’s the reality. You all have reported this. We’ve seen this. We saw — we saw what was being stated, what was being put out there by the president-elect and Elon Musk. There’s no hiding from that. That’s the reality.

And — and so, you know, we’re talking about — this is not politics here. We’re taking about American — the American people who need these program — who need it.

And so,  Political [Politico] Playbook said — had to say — what they had to say about this: “Trump picked the fight.” He picked the fight. “And it was Trump — well, with — him and Elon Musk — who sank the bipartisan deal.”

That’s what you all are reporting. You can’t — you can’t twist the facts or change history here.

Go ahead.

Q: So, based on the White House’s assessment of where things stand right now on Capitol Hill, should Americans be prepared for the government to shut down tonight at midnight?

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: There’s still time. We believe there’s still time for that to not happen; for Republicans to do the right thing, to hold up their part of the deal and move forward with the bipartisan agreement. There’s still time.

And our focus is keeping the government open. That’s what we want to see, and we hope Republicans want to do that — Republicans in Congress want to do that as well. And there’s still time.

Q: And we’ve talked a little bit here about how the president really has not been a player at all in these negotiations. I know you said he spoke with Schumer and Jeffries today. But what exactly is his strategy behind that? Is there a sense that perhaps having him involved at this moment would do more harm than good?

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: I just — I just — I kind of took this question. I got some formulation of that question moments ago. The president knows how to deal with Congress. He’s been around for some time, as you all know. And this is not the first time that we’ve had this strategy where we have said it is Congress’s — one of their number one jobs is to keep the government open.

In this particular instance, you saw what Republicans did with Speaker Johnson, leading us to this mess, to where we are right now. And they need to fix it, period. It is their mess to fix. There was a deal — a bipartisan deal — there was — just days ago.

And they created this mess. Speaker Johnson needs to fix this. Republicans in Congress needs to fix this. It is their mess to fix, and they allowed this bipartisan deal to be scuttled by the president-elect.

Q: And if the government shuts down for an extended period of time, would President Biden commit to remaining here in Washington and not going through with his holiday plans?

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: I don’t have anything. I can’t get into hypotheticals. I don’t have anything to share on this. We believe, as I just said moments ago, there’s still time to get a bipar — to get a deal here or move forward — I shouldn’t say “get to a deal” — move forward with a bipartisan agreement.

They can avoid a shutdown. They can. They were on their way to doing that and it was scuttled by the president-elect and Elon Musk. This is why we’re here today. That’s why we’re here today.

Go ahead. Yep. Go ahead.

Q: Karine, you said that House Speaker Mike Johnson needs to fix this. Has President Biden spoken to the House speaker, or does he have any plans to?

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: I’ve answered this in so many ways, and I’m going to answer it now. We got to be really clear. Speaker Johnson created this mess, and he needs to fix it. I don’t have anything else to add beyond that.

He knows — the speaker knows how to fix this. They got a bipartisan deal. He said he was going to move forward with it. They stopped it because of the direction that they were given by president-elect and Elon Musk.

And right now, we need to focus and we need to continue to focus on the American people. We’re talking about shutting down the government. That will impact veterans’ programs, services that Americans truly need.

They know how to fix this. Republicans actually know how to fix this. That’s why they — they were able to get a bipartisan agreement on the table.

They know, in order to move forward with this you need a bipartisan agreement, and there was one, and they did not move forward with it because of what they were told by President-elect Trump and Elon Musk.

Go ahead, Gabe.

Q: Hi, Karine. I’ll go at the question another way.

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: The president is the president of the United States, and he is leading.

And to be very clear, as it relates to this, I’ve said this many times before — moments ago — and I’ll say it again. We have done this strategy before — this is not new — where we have said Congress needs to deal with this. This is — their number one job is to keep the government open. And there was an agreement on the — on the table — not just an agreement, a bipartisan agreement.

Speaker Johnson created this mess. He needs to fix it, period. Period.

Q: To be clear, the strategy is he is leading by staying in the background?

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: The strategy is the Congress — Republicans, in particular — need to do their jobs and get out of their own way and focus on the American people, not their billionaire friends. That is what needs to happen, and that’s what the president wants to see.

Q: Does the president believe that the U.S. debt ceiling should be eliminated?

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: You all know where the president stands on this.

His focus right now is keeping the government open. That’s what he’s going to focus on.

Q: The vice president canceled her trip to California. Can you say why?

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: You would have to speak to her office. I don’t have — I —

Q: And then —

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: — I can’t speak to that.

Q: And then, finally, on Syria, really quickly. The DOD said yesterday that there are about 2,000 U.S. troops in Syria. That’s double what the administration said beforehand.

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: Yeah.

Q: Why the discrepancy?

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: So, I would have to refer you to the Department of Defense to speak to troop numbers. That is their purview. That is something that we have always been pretty consistent on that they have to speak to.

I know that they said yesterday that the additional forces are considered temporary, that they are depleted to — to meet shifting rising req – mission requirements, but I have to leave it to the Department of Defense, to the Pentagon to speak to troops.

Q: But so– last question, Karine.

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: Yeah.

Q: And I know you have tried to answer it several times.

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: (Laughs.)

Q: But shouldn’t Americans hear from the president of the United States just hours from a shutdown?

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: What Americans need to know is that you have Republicans in Congress, in the House who got in a way, who stopped a bipartisan agreement. They got in the way. They created this mess.

And I — and I said this mo- — earlier, when I said — and you all know this; you report this — it is not easy to get a bipartisan agreement here in this town. And there was one.

Both sides sat down. They came to an agreement, which is a good thing for the American people. We thought we were moving in that direction, and they decided to — Republicans decided to, instead, listen and give — give space to their billionaire friends and not put the American people first. That’s what is happening. That’s what we’re seeing.

Go ahead, Michael.

Q: Thanks, Karine. Just wondering if you could give us an update on Nippon Steel’s pending purchase of U.S. Steel. (Coughs.) Excuse me. The panel that is reviewing that transaction is expected to issue its recommendations soon. So, I’m just wondering if you have any update on the timing. And, also, is the president prepared to accept those recommendations, regardless of what they are, or does he plan to block this transaction?

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: I’m not going to get ahead of the president. I don’t have any announcements to make. And — and so, I’m just going to leave it there. Just don’t have anything to share. Don’t have an announcement to make at this time and certainly not going to get ahead of the president at the podium.

Q: (Inaudible) even the timing or —

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: I — I don’t — you know, CFIUS — that’s a CFIUS review. They are independent. We leave it to them to — to make that decision on the timing. I just don’t have anything to share on this.

Go ahead, Karen.

Q: Could you talk a little bit more about the president’s trip next month to Italy?

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: Yeah.

Q: In your statement last night, you said that he had accepted the invitation of the pope to visit next month.

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: Yeah.

Q: How did that come about? Did that just happen on the phone call yesterday?

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: Yeah.

Q: Did the president express interest to the Vatican that he wanted to make this trip? It’s pretty late in a term to be traveling so —

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: Yeah.

Q: — soon — you know, close to the end like that.

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: So — so, I don’t have any information for you. I would like to talk to the team about the timeline.

Look, the president is looking forward to going back to — to Italy. As you all know, he’s been there a couple of times in this — in — in his first term — in this term, and so he’s going to — and he’s met, obviously, a couple of times in this administration alone with His Holiness Pope Francis, and obviously he’s — he looks forward to that.

And as you know, he is — he is a proud Catholic, and so that is something that he certainly was looking forward to that. And — and having a conversation about peace around the world. We know that is an issue His Holiness cares about.

I don’t have specifics or — or behind-the-scenes private conversations on how this land and the timing of this. What we can share is that it’s happening, the president looks forward to it, and we certainly will have more to share as we get closer, like we normally do when an OCONUS trip —

Q: And should —

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: — happens.

Q: — we should expect domestic travel to the president in January? Is he going to be out there doing any farewell speeches on policy issues in other parts of the country?

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: So, I would say, stay tuned. We’ll certainly have more to share about what January will look like for the president. Don’t have anything to — specifically to announce right now.

Go ahead.

Q: Thank you. I’m just going to try to ask this a different way.

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: Yeah.

Q: The president is still —

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: You’re going to get the same answer (Laughs.)

Q: — in office. I — I’m just going to try.

He’s still in office for —

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: Feel free. (Laughs.)

Q: — a month. The American people really haven’t heard from him on whether or not the government is going to shut down. Wouldn’t the message hit differently if the president were out there countering the message that we’re hearing from the president elect an Elon Musk? Why isn’t he speaking on this?

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: Republicans are breaking their word. They are breaking their word to support a bipartisan agreement. We would not be in this position if Republicans in the House did not break their word. That’s where we are.

And we’re talking about the agreement — when you look about — when you think about what their agreement would do, it would lower prescription drugs costs and make it harder — make it harder to offshore jobs to China. We’re taking about veterans who needs some — this — these services.

And they — instead of what they want to do is they put forth a bill that would pave the way for tax break for billionaires. That’s what they did. Instead of going with a bipartisan agreement, they put forth something that would pave the way for their billionaire friends. That’s not about the American people.

And we have been here before when we’re trying to make sure there’s not a government shutdown. The president has had the same — kind of the same strategy. He knows how to work with Congress.

And so, in this instance, the Republicans blew this deal up. They did. They blew it up, and they need to fix it. This is not for the president to fix. This is not for us to fix. This is for Republicans in Congress to fix this — the — the mess that they created.

Q: But has he expressed any thoughts or feelings on the president-elect and Elon Musk’s —

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: You — you —

Q: –inter- —

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: You’re —

Q: –talking about this process?

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: You’re hearing what I’m saying, right?

I speak for the president of the United States, so you’re — when I speak for the president of the United States, I’m speaking directly for him. So, you are hearing where he feels about this, what his thoughts are about this. And we tr- — believe, and the American people should know this, that Republicans need to fix the mess that they caused.

The Speaker knows how to get this right. To get this right is to move forward with a bipartisan agreement — the bipartisan agreement that they had come to nor long ago.

We thought they were going to move forward with that agreement, and they blew it up. They blew it up.

Q: Thanks, Karine.

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: You’re good?

Go ahead.

Q: Thanks, Karine. Has agencies, has the government started informing employees who might be furloughed?

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: Yeah.

Q: You know, those specific folks, especially heading into the holiday season, are they being informed-

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: Yeah.

Q: — that they might not get their paycheck?

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: So, look, we believe that Co- there’s still time for Congress to prevent a partial shutdown. We believe that. But in the interest of t — of prudent planning — we want to be prudent here — agencies did start notifying their employees for — of — of their potential furlough today at noon. And so, on that specific — as it related to furloughs, I would certainly refer you to OM — OMB on those specifics.

Q: And given the high stakes of this shutdown, again during the holiday season —

MS.JEAN-PIERRE: Yeah.

Q: — affecting people like veterans, police officers —

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: Exactly

Q: – et. cetera, will the president speak to the American people if there is a shutdown so that they can hear from him directly —

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: I am not —

Q: — in that moment?

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: I am not going to get into hypotheticals, because we believe, as I just — the beginning of answering your last questions — that there’s still time to prevent a partial government shutdown. We believe th — that Congress — Republicans in Congress could get to a place where they prevent this.

Q: When is the next time that people will hear from the president?

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: I’m not going to get into hypotheticals.

Q: (inaudible.)

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: It is very easy — it — I hear your question, but it is very easy to fix this.

The mess that Republicans created, it is very easy for them to fix this: bipartisan deal agreement. Move forward. Keep — keep your word, Republicans in Congress. Keep your word. Keep your word.

Go ahead.

Q: Thank you, Karine. I have a question on China. In the final month of this adm- — administration, we continue to see high-level talks between the U.S. and China, including last week. Is President Biden making his final effort to strengthen U.S.-China relationship ahead of Trump administration? And are you concerned those (inaudible) you’ve established with China ma– might be abandoned next year? Thank you.

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: So — and I’m just going to repeat what the president has said, what the national security adviser, Jake Sullivan, hav said from this podium ha — about the relationship — the U.S. relationship with China. And what the president remains doing is — and is incredibly focused on is managing the most consequential relationship. You’ve heard both of them say that this is the most consequential relationship. And it is because of the work of this administration that we are handling — handing off the U.S. – China relationship in a stronger, competitive position.

Remember, at the beginning of this administration, we would talk about how it is about competition. That’s how we wanted to kind of see that relationship as well — about competition. So, that’s what the president and this administration is leaving the incoming relationship.

Under President Biden, we have made America stronger and positioned us to outcompete China through significant investments in the United States, developed closer relationship with our allies and partners in the Indo-Pacific, increasing our deterrent capabilities, and diminished China’s ability to exploit our most sensitive technologies.

At the same time, we are carefully managing — and we have carefully managed this relationship through skilled diplomacy to prevent com- — competition from vering — veering into conflict. Remember, that’s what we want. We want competition, not conflict.

So, we’re going to continue to manage this relationship. I’m not going to get into hypotheticals of what the next administration may or may not do. But what I can lay out, as I just did, is how the president has focused on this consequential relationship with — with China — the U.S. – China relationship.

Go ahead.

Q: Thank you. Just following up on Karen’s question on the trip to Italy and what would be the second meeting with the pope. We all know that for the president, his faith is very important, but this isn’t a trip he’s taking as a private citizen. This is a —

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: Yeah.

Q: — a trip he’s taking as head of state.

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: Yeah.

Q: So, what’s the broader message here? Why this choice for what might be his final international trip?

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: So, look, we’re going to have more information, as we normally do. We do background calls, press calls with all of you as we head into an OCONUS. We’re going to do the same. Nothing has changed. And we will lay out the goals, the reasons, what we expect to get out of this trip.

But I tried to give you a little bit of — of what the president — the logistics of what the — who the president is going to meet and — and the discussions that he’s hoping to have.

And let’s not forget, the prime minister is — she’s — she’s the leader of the G7 right now — right? — and has strong — has shown strong leadership, So, that’s in – — important too, to have — for him to have — for him to — to have that — continue that diplomatic conversions with her as well.

And so, certainly, we will have more to share as we get closer to — to the travel.

Go ahead.

Q: Thanks, Karine. There are some Republican lawmakers who are actually advocating for a government shutdown. One example is Marjory Taylor Greene from Georgia. She says “Shut it down.” Can you explain the repercussions of what a partial government shutdown would be for specific groups? For seniors —

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: Yeah.

Q: — for veterans, for those that depend on government services, can you explain what —

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: Yeah.

Q: — this possibility would mean for those individuals?

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: And it is sad that I have to explain that. Really. They are congressional members. Their — one of their p- — duties is to keep the government open because, as you just stated, we’re talking about veterans, we’re talking about vulnerable Americans who need services the the federal government provides in order just to make it to the — through the day.

And it is sad that — you know, what we’re seeing from Republicans is picking their billionaire friends — that’s what they’re doing — not the American people, not our veterans. And we’re talking about basic services that are needed.

OMB certainly could dive in and lay out the different programs that will be affect- — that — that will be impacted, and that will impact Americans if this indeed happens.

But, you know, Jon, we can avoid this. They can avoid this. This does not have to end this way. We do not have to end with a government shutdown and — and really put a — a negative impact on American families, a negative impact on — on our veterans.

This could be avoided. Republicans in Congress don’t have to go this route. They don’t. There was a whole different route that they were going, which would have actually been done in a bipartisan way.

We believe — this president believes that it is important as we move policies, as we move forward on behalf of the American we- — people, we do it in a bipartisan way. And they had that deal.

Q: Do you happen to know if there would be a delay of any kind of Social Security recipients from receiving their checks —

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: Yeah.

Q: — or members of the military from receiving their pay?

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: You’re laying out everything that we are concerned about. Those are the things that we are concerned about. Yes, those are concerns.

But there’s a way out of this. There is. Republicans need to fix this. They need to fix this mess they created. It’s very easy to do.

Q: You do an excellent job advocating on behalf of the president, but do you think the president would do a better job if he was out there making those same ideas —

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: Yeah.

Q: — present to the public in terms of what a shutdown would mean for all of those vulnerable Americans?

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: What I will say is if Republicans need to do their job. I would not be taking — fielding these questions from you all if Repubicans didn’t lead us here. They did. They — they created this mess.

The only reason we’re having this back-and-forth is because Republicans created this mess in Congress — in the House, specifically. They created this mess, and they can fix it. They were on their way to fixing this with the bipartisan agreement.

So, I think the onus is on them to get this right.

Go ahead.

Q: Does the administration have any updates on the whereabouts of Austin Tice compared to last week?

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: Yeah, I don’t have any updates to share. Obviously, it is a priority for this president to get Austin home. That is something that certainly we want to see.

I wil speak to – — Assistant Secretary Barbara Leaf and Ambassador Roger Carstens’ travel to Damascus Syria, to engage with Syrian people — with the Syrian people, including members of civil society, activists, and other Syrians, about their vision of the future of their country and how the United States can help support them.

They also met with representatives of the interim authorities to discuss transition pri- — principles shared by the United States and regional partners.

In their meetings — to your question — they stressed the immense importance of finding missing U.S. citizens, including Austin Tice, and bringing them home. So that is a — continues to be a priority.

Any specifics about that — that meeting, I would refer you to the State Depart – — Department. I know at 12:30 the two State — State Department officials held a – a on-the-record press conference. So, I would refer you to that press conference they had. It might still be going, but they were certainyable to talk in more details and take questions about this. And, again, they — they talk — they touched on — on Austin Tice and this and, more broadly, obviously, bringing U.S. citizens home.

Go ahead.

Q: Does the president have, say, three top priorities for things he still wants to accomplish in the next 32 days he is in office?

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: Well, one of the things that I can say is keeping the government open. Right? We want to make sure that happens.

Congres had a bipartisan agreement. They should move forward. Republicans should not get in the way. Should pi — should chose the Americ- — American people first, not Republican — Republican or their billionaire friends.

And so, that is something that we have said many times from here: that that was a priority for this president.

Certainly, we want to continue to implement — excel the implementation of key priorities that the president has had, meaning the bipartisan infrastructure legislation, the CHIPS and Science Act. We want to make sure that those investments, — that continues, and we want to excel on that.

And we’ve talked about continuing to lower costs as — as it relates to prescription drugs, but lowering costs more broadly, certainly, for the American people.

And so, that’s our focus. That’s what we’ve been doing. And — and we’re going to continue — continue, certainly to do that.

Q: Can we expect more announcements at — on at least some of those fronts in the next few weeks?

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: I — look, I would say “stay tuned.” We are trying to truly, truly run through the tape here and get as much done as you we can for the American people.

And we know that the American people wants us to continue to work on behalf — on their behalf, and that’s what the president is going to be focused on.

Q: And then, really briefly, since you mentioned the shutdown — different angle on that question.

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: Sure.

Q: Potential shutdown, I should say.

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: Yeah.

Q: Should the American people be confident that, in the event of a shutdown, there would still be a smooth transition and inauguration process?

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: That has been the president’s commitment. That has — and that you’ve heard directly from him. We want to make sure that there is a responsible — committed to a responsible transition. And, as you know, his team — he and — he and his team have certainly been working towards that. The team has been preparing for months to make sure that happens.

I will say, though, if there is a shutdown — and I don’t want to get to much into hypotheticals, but this is the reality — transition activities will be restricted and — and with limited exceptions, obviously but — such as prevent imminent threats to the safety of human life or the protection of property. Those are the things that we would — that — you know, that we would have to be concerned about.

And so, we’re doing everything to ensure a smooth transition, but the choice to allow a transition to move forward is within the hands of Republicans in Congress.

You know, we can continue to have this footh — transition — smooth transition of power if they stop threatening a shutdown. And a — and, you know, they have an opportunity — Republicans in Congress have an opportunity to keep the government open so that we can continue what the president commitment has been for months now is to make sure that there is a smooth transition of power.

AIDE: Karine, you have time for one more.

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: Okay.

Go ahead.

Q: Just two clarifications.

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: Yeah.

Q: So, I guess, the first one. Is this trip to Rome the last foreign trip that the president will take?

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: What I can say is the president is going to Italy and is going to an OCONUS trip in January. I — I’m always very careful. (Laughs.) Anything could happen. But what I — what I can say for sue is that the president is certainly going to be going to Italy.

We announced that. We’ll have more to share. I don’t have anything else to share.

Q: And then, secondly, related to the CR. Given what you said about the president’s views on — on debt limit increases or eliminating the debt limit, does that mean that that would be something that would be vetoed by the president if it reached his desk?

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: I — I’m not going to get into hypothetical. I’m just not.

I think what is important here is there is a path forward. There has been a path forward. There is a bipartisan agreement that the Republicans tanked because of what they were directed to do by Elon Musk and President-elect Trump. That’s how it happened . That is the reality that we’re in now.

And this is not the direction that we thought we were going just a couple of days ago.

And so, Republicans blew up this deal. They can fix it. It is their mess tif fix, and they have to choose the American people. They have to do their basic job — is choosing the American people and delivering for them.

Thanks, everybody.

Q: Thanks, Karine.


December 20, 2024: CNN Politics reported: “What’s at risk if Congress doesn’t fund the government by Friday Night” It was written by Tami Luhby, Katie Lobosco and Betsy Klein.

The federal government could shit down in a matter of hours if Congress does not cobble together a temporary funding plan on Friday.

Lawmakers are racing to come to an agreement that will meet with enough support to pass. President-elect Donald Trump torpedoed their bipartisan package on Wednesday, and a slimmed-down House GOP bill that Trump backed failed on Thursday.

The now-dead bipartisan agreement would have kept the federal government operating through March 14, as well as provided nearly $100 billion in disaster aid and economic relief for farmers in rural communities. The deal also would have provided lawmakers with the first pay raise since 2009. The GOP would have also kept the government open through mid-March and included disaster aid funding and a two-year suspension of the debt ceiling, in line with Trump’s demands.

Here’s what Americans could soon face if Congress doesn’t reach a deal by midnight on Friday:

Government shutdown looms

Lawmakers have until the end of Friday to fund the federal government — at least temporarily — to avoid a shutdown. Since Congress has not approved appropriations for any agencies, all would be affected.

But many Americans may not feel the impact immediately since the shutdown would begin on a Saturday, when many federal agencies are closed. That would give lawmakers a little more time to negotiate a deal.

Every department and agency has its own set of plans and procedures for a shutdown, which last occurred during Trump’s first time and stretched from just before Christmas in 2019 to the end of January 2019.

The plans include how many employees would be furloughed, which employees are considered essential and would work without pay, how long it would take to come to a halt. Those plans can vary from shutdown to shutdown.

“While our personnel are prepared to handle high volumes of travelers and ensure safe travel, please be aware that an extended shutdown could mean longer wait times at airports,” TSA Administrator David Pekose posed on X on Thursday, noting that the agency is expecting to screen 40 million passengers over the holidays, through January 2.

Roughly 59,000 of the agency’s more than 62,000 employees are considered essential and would continue working without pay during a shutdown, he wrote.

However, during the 2019 shutdown, hundreds of TSA officers called out from work — many of them to find other ways to make money. So did many air traffic controllers, snarling flights.

The National Parks Service said Thursday that should a funding lapse occur, routine visitor services would be available through Sunday. The agency is still reviewing its contingency plan to determine operations for individual parks.

However some states could use their own funds to keep the national parks within their borders open. When a shutdown loomed in the fall of 2023, Utah said it would keep the Might 5 parks – Arches, Bryce Canyon, Canyonlands, Capitol Reef, and Zion — open, while Arizona planned to keep the Grand Canyon operational. Colorado also said it would keep its four national parks and federal lands open.

The Smithsonian museums and the National Zoo said Friday they will remain open at least through December 26, except for Christmas Day, by using prior-year funds.

The Defense Department’s operations would also be affected by a shutdown, Pentagon spokesman Maj. Gen. Pat Ryder said Tuesday.

“Objectively speaking, a lapse in funding will cause serious disruptions across the Defense Department,” Ryder said, though he noted the agency would “continue to carry out our fundamental responsibility and mission to defend our nation and the American people.”

More than 2 million US military personnel, including active duty and reserves, would continue their duties during a shutdown, according to the latest planning from the Pentagon, but they could potentially work without pay until a deal is reached. It would depend, in part, on whether Congress would pass legislation similar to the one it approved prior to the 2023 shutdown that guaranteed the military would be paid during the impasse.

Meanwhile, the Department of Defense’s robust civilian workforce supporting service members’ efforts could be affected. About 45% of the civilian workforce — more than 800,000 employees – would be furloughed. Ryder warned that it would impact military technicians, among others. And while defense contracts awarded prior to a shutdown continue, the department’s guidance states that “new contracts may not be executed.”

The White House has also previously warned that a lapse in funding could lead to a disruption in military recruitment efforts…

…The Food and Drug Administration would continue to handle and respond to emergencies, including monitoring for and responding to outbreaks related to foodborne illness, supporting food and medical product recalls, screening imported food and medical products and addressing other critical public heath issues, according to the latest guidance from the Department of Health and Human Services. However, food safety inspections could be disrupted…

Trump’s extended shutdown

Trump presided over the longest government shutdown in four decades during his first term. The 35-day impasse ended in late January when Trump agreed to a temporary funding measure that did not include billions of dollars for a border wall.

However, the shutdown wreaked havoc on many Americans and federal employees, including causing flight delays, canceling immigration hearings, and making it harder for some families to obtain student loans.


December 20, 2024: NBC News reported: “What’s happening ahead of a shutdown”

Though it is past the midnight deadline, the government will not shut down.

The House and Senate both passed a bill to keep the government funded through March 14, along with funds for disaster aid.

The White House said that President Joe Biden would sign it into law on Saturday and agencies would not shut down.

The House last night rejected a separate short-term spending bill after Republican leaders scrapped an earlier bipartisan deal and made major changes to appease President-elect Donald Trump, billionaire Elon Musk and restless rank-and-file GOP lawmakers.

A shutdown would have wide-ranging effects inside and outside the government. The Transportation Security Administration warned that a funding lapse would lead to longer lines at airports, while U.S. troops, Border Patrol agents and air traffic controllers would be among the millions of federal employees working without pay this holiday season.

What happens if the government shuts down?

In the event of a government shutdown, all nonessential government functions hit the pause button and the federal government is unable to pay federal employees. Hundreds of thousands of employees could be furloughed for the duration of the shutdown, while others would work without pay.

During a 2023 government shutdown, 850,000 federal employees were furloughed.

The military and federal public safety employees, such as TSA agents and air traffic control personnel, are usually “excepted” from being furloughed and continue to work through a government shutdown. Each federal agency has a contingency plan for how to operate during a shutdown.

Other “essential” functions of the government — such as sending out Social Security checks and payments for Medicare and Medicaid — are expected to continue during a government shutdown.

What is a continuing resolution?

A continuing resolution — often referred to as a “CR” in shorthand — is a stopgap funding measure that temporarily funds the government at current levels for a set amount of time.

Each year Congress is expected to fund the government by Oct. 1, the start of the new fiscal year. If it fails to do so, the House and Senate are also allowed to authorize a continuing resolution to temporarily keep the government operating at previously-approved levels.

In October, both chambers approved a continuing resolution, setting Dec. 20 as the new deadline to fund the government. Earlier this week, House and Senate leaders unveiled the text of a fresh continuing resolution that they hoped to pass on a bipartisan basis to fund the government at current levels through March 14.

Their hopes to pass the deal were dashed after Trump, Vance, and tech mogul Elon Musk spoke out against the bill, tanking GOP support for it.

How Musk and Trump caused Congress’ nightmare before Christmas

It was government shutdown season in Washington, and all through the House, many creatures were stirring — most notably Elon Musk.

Lawmakers in Congress were expecting a glide path to the holidays. They had a bipartisan deal that would keep the government funded and sent them all on their merry way back to their districts.

But then they got a taste of what the next four years might be like with Donald Trump back in the White House and Musk, the world’s richest man, wielding enormous power of the political process.

On Wednesday, Trump – with help from Musk — effectively killed the funding legislator put together by House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., a 1,500-page bill packed with the byproduct of the traditional horse-trading the generally defines congressional dealmaking.

Speaker Mike Johnson says to expect House votes this morning

House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said as he entered the Capitol that House votes are expected this morning.

“So y’all stay tuned, we’ve got a plan,” he said.

Freedom Caucus members and other conservatives like Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., have already entered his office.

Vice President-elect JD Vance, still a senator from Ohio, has also arrayed and entered the speaker’s office through a back door.

Trump says if there is a government shutdown, let it happen under Biden

Trump said that if the government is to shut down, it should happen while Joe Biden is still president.

“If there is going to be a shutdown of government, let it begin now, under the Biden Administration, not after January 20th, under “TRUMP.” This is a Biden problem to solve, but if Republicans can help solve it, they will!” Trump wrote on his Truth Social account.

Trump and his allies are responsible for House Republicans’ decision to abandon the bipartisan deal that had already been negotiated to fund the government.

When will the government shut down?

If both chambers of Congress are not able to agree on a deal to pass a funding bill as the clock ticks down to midnight, the government will officially shut down at 12:01 a.m. tomorrow.

Before Trump weighed in Wednesday to tank a bipartisan deal on a continuing resolution, it seemed that both chamber were set to vote on and pass a stopgap bill that would have kept the government open through March 14.

Senate Appropriations Chair Patty Murray slams Musk, vows to stay in D.C. Through Christmas

Senate Appropriations Committee Chair Patty Murray, D-Wash., said in a statement this morning that she’s “ready to stay” in Washington through Christmas because she said Democrats won’t let Elon Musk “run the government.”

“Put simply, we should not let an unelected billionaire rip away research for pediatric cancer so he can get a tax cut or tear down policies that help America outcompete Chime because it could hurt his bottom line,” she said. “We had a bipartisan deal — we should stick to it.”

The spending bill that House Republicans proposed and failed to pass last night had stripped out funding for child cancer research.

The original bipartisan agreement would fund the government and provide disaster relief to various communities across the country, Murray said.

“The American people do not want chaos or a costly government shutdown because an unelected billionaire wants to call the shots — I am ready to work with Republicans and Democrats to pass the bipartisan deal both sides negotiated as soon as possible,” she said.

Shutdown looms as Trump-backed bill fails in the House

The House rejected a bill late yesterday to keep the government funded temporarily after Republican leaders reneged on an earlier bipartisan deal and made modifications to appease Trump, Musk, and an internal GOP revolt. The vote was 174-235, with one Democrat voting present, falling short of the two-thirds majority needed to pass it under a fast-track process.

Trump again calls for elimination of debt ceiling or suspending it until 2029

Trump wrote on his Truth Social account overnight that Congress should either eliminate the debt ceiling or suspend it until after his presidency.

“Congress must get rid of, or extend out to, perhaps 2029, the ridiculous Debt Ceiling. Without this, we should never make a deal. Remember, the pressure is on whoever is President,” he said on his Truth Social account just after 1 a.m.

Trump had called for getting rid of the debt ceiling during a phonically with NBC News yesterday.

What are House Democrats up to today?

House Democrats are planning to meet at 10 a.m. today to discuss government funding, according to an invite obtained by NBC News.

Democrats overwhelmingly voted against a bill last night that would have temporarily funded the government. As many as 38 Republicans voted against the bill as well, leading to the measure falling short of the two-thirds majority needed for approval, per the rules of fast track processes.

A shutdown is slated to begin if a deal is not reached this evening.

GOP member says Republicans are not negotiating with Democrats

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., told reporters outside the speaker’s office that Republicans aren’t negotiating with Democrats to avert a shutdown.

“We’re not cutting deals with Democrats. We’re going to work it out here. I do not believe that government is going to be shutting down,” she said. “But you guys will see some great stuff very similar to President Trump’s plan yesterday.

She suggested that Republicans were close to another deal, but Rep. Dusty Johnson, R-S.D., said: “Anyone who’s telling you there is a deal is a little ahead of themselves.”

Rep Bob Good, R-Va., the former House Freedom Caucus chair who lost his primary this year, told reporters after emerging from a leadership meeting that he won’t support any measure that incudes a debt ceiling increase that isn’t offset, among other things.

“I’m not voting for a debt ceiling increase that doesn’t have massive spending cuts and structural fiscal reforms,” he said. “I’ve been very clear about that, so I don’t think it’s going to happen.”

GOP Rep. Dusty Johnson says Trump should come to Washington to work out the funding package

Rep. Dusty Johnson, R-S.D., called on Trump to come to Washington to help negotiate a funding package.

“I think that’d be wonderful,” he said in an interview on CNN. “Clearly, the president, incoming president, has some strongly held opinions about what he’d like to see in this package.”

“He is, not infrequently, a disruptive force, and that is a good thing,” Johnson said. “If he got here, I think we would be able to get a really good package together quickly,” he later added.

Johnson’s statement echoed a similar comment made by Sen. Kevin Cramer, R-N.D., who yesterday also called on Trump to come to Washington to assist with funding negotiations.

Rules Committee to meet on how to tackle a funding plan

Rep. Ralph Norman, R-S.C., said the Rules Committee will meet soon to move forward on a government spending plan.

Norman, a member of the committee, said the panel has to. give an hour notice before meeting, and that the notice will go out soon.

When asked if he will support the plan, Norman said yes, but he would not provide details.

The House currently does not have the authority to bring up a rule on the floor the same day it is approved by the Rules Committee. There are procedural work-arounds for this that the House will have to use if Republicans plan to bring the new plan forward on a rule.

Schumer demands Republicans return to the original agreement and work with Democrats

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said in floor remarks this morning that he wants Republicans to return to the original agreement that was negotiated in a bipartisan way with Democrats.

He warned that if Republicans don’t work with Democrats, the government will shut down at 12:01 a.m.

“It’s time to go back to the original agreement we had just a few days ago,” Schumer said. “It’s time for that. It’s time for the House votes on our bipartisan CR. It’s the quickest, simplest and easiest way we can make sure the government stays open while delivering critical emergency aid to the American people.”

Schumer added, “If the House put our original agreement on the floor today, it would pass, and we could put the threat of a shutdown behind us.”

Rep. Barbara Lee says Democrats are ready to negotiate

Rep. Barbara Lee, D-Calif., who sits on the House Appropriations Committee, said Democrats are ready to negotiate on a funding bill and addressed a comment from Rep. Ana Paulina Luna, R- Fla., earlier today saying Republicans are “not cutting deals with Democrats.”

“There was an agreement, and so we’re waiting, ready, willing, and waiting to engage in negotiations,” Lee said. “But you heard what the congresswoman just said, they don’t care. They don’t want to.”

Library of Congress announces its buildings will close if there’s a shutdown

The Library of Congress’ buildings will be closed to the public and researchers if the government shuts down, it said in an advisory.

All public events will be canceled, the advisory said. “Also, all inquiries and requests to the Library of Congress web-based services will not be received or responded to until the shutdown ends.”

David P. Pekoske (@TSA_Pekoske) posted on X “At TSA, part of DHS, about 59,000 of the agency’s 62,000+ employees are considered essential and would continue working without pay in the event of a shutdown. We expect to screen 40M passengers over the holidays and through January 2.

While our personnel are prepared to handle high volumes of travelers and ensure safe travel, please be aware that an extended shutdown could mean longer wait times at airports.”

How will the military be affected if the government shuts down?

If there is an extended shutdown, military pay and civilian pay will halt. Without a deal on Capitol Hill, troops will miss their end-of-month paycheck this holiday season. Military reservists drilling after Dec. 20 will not receive pay for those drills, and federal civilians who are required to work during a shutdown will not be paid either.

Death benefits will also cease during a government shutdown, so if any deaths occur after one begins, the Defense Department could not pay out benefits until Congress passes a continuing resolution or an appropriations bill.

Several Defense Department actions would continue under a government shutdown. For example, military personnel on active duty — including reserve component personnel on federal active duty — will continue to report for duty and carry out assignments.

Military retiree benefits are paid from a trust fund and thus could continue during a shutdown. However, retiree pay may be slowed due to the lack of personnel working to process payments.

House Republicans expect a full conference meeting on the plans

House Republicans, shuttling in and out of the speaker’s office, say they’re likely to huddle as a full conference to assess the new plan formed by their leadership.

The specifics of that plan are being kept close to the vest, as details remain in flux. The same is true of the conference huddle itself: The timing hasn’t yet been provided to members, and given the fluidity of the funding talks, a full conference meeting could get scrapped altogether. For now, however, such a huddle is very much on the table and expected by members.

Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz says Democrats are unified

After the Democratic Caucus meeting this morning, Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, D.Fla., said on MSNBC that Democrats are on the same page as they work to avoid a shutdown.

“We heard from leader Hakeem Jeffries and our senior members, who are all unified and focused on making sure that we can take care of the needs of the American people based on the votes that we take before the government shuts down,” she said.

What is the debt ceiling?

The debt ceiling is the legal limit set by federal lawmakers for how much the U.S. can borrow to pay its bills. Once that limit is reached, it can trigger a government shutdown because the U.S. is unable to pay its bills unless both chambers of Congress pass a bill to raise or suspend the debt ceiling.

In 2023, lawmakers on Capitol Hill and President Joe Biden reached a deal to temporarily suspend the debt ceiling through January 1, 2025.

The debt ceiling had limited effects on the House and Senate leaders’ deliberations this month on a government funding bill, but yesterday, Trump and Vance said in a statement that they expected Congress to address the debt ceiling before the end of Biden’s term.

“Increasing the debt ceiling is not great but we’d rather do it on Biden’s watch,” the pair said in a joint statement that also tanked GOP support for the current government funding deal that was negotiated on a bipartisan basis.

Yesterday morning, Trump told NBC News that he supported getting rid of the debt ceiling entirely, calling it “smartest thing it [Congress] could do.”

House minority leader says Democrats and Republicans are again talking

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., told reporters as he left a meeting with House Democrats that “the lines of communication have been reopened.” with Republicans on the government funding bill.

When asked about the possible new version of a bill, Jeffries said he could not comment without seeing it.

“I can’t comment on a plan when there’s no plan in front of me to evaluate,” he said.

Will national parks remain open in the event of a shutdown?

The short answer is, it depends. According to a National Park Service contingency plan published in March, parks or facilities that can be locked or secured during non-business hours will be closed for the duration of a government shutdown.

Parks that are harder to “close” or secure, “meaning due to their physical characteristics it is impossible or impractical to restrict public access,” will have limited staffing levels that will vary by the size of the park.

But according to the contingency plan, if a government shutdown begins on a Saturday, the National Park Service has a 48-hour period to begin implementing closures and changes, meaning parks may not be closed yet this weekend, for the first two days of the shutdown.

The contingency plan also state that agency workers involved in law enforcement, emergency response, coastal protection and surveillance, fire suppression and several other fields may continue working for the duration of the shutdown.

How are Head Start, WIC and other programs for children affected during a government shutdown?

The food safety net, which includes the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), child nutrition programs, and Special Supplemental Nutrition for Women, Infants and Children (WIC), is allowed to continue dispersing benefits in the event of a government shutdown, according to a 2024 U.S. Department of Agriculture contingency plan.

But the contingency plan adds that if funding for these programs runs out during the shutdown, “then program operations for the above programs would cease.”

It’s not clear how long it would take for these programs to run out, but last September, ahead of another possible shutdown that was averted, Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack told NPR that WIC benefits could run out “within a matter of days” and predicted SNAP could continue as normal for about a month into a shutdown.

Head Start, a federally funded preschool program for disadvantaged children, would be without federal funds for the duration of a shutdown. Local partners who receive grants from Head Start could continue operating by using funding from other sources, but plenty of other Head Start preschool programs could be shuttered for the duration of the shutdown.

How is the Department of Health and Human Services affected if the government shuts down?

About 45% of employees at the Department of Health and Human Services will be furloughed if the government shuts down, while the remaining 55% will continue working in some capacity, the agency’s contingency plan says.

At the National Institutes of Health, providers will continue to care for patients at the facility’s clinical center and it will admit new patients when “medically necessary.”

Karine Jean-Pierre says Biden is receiving regular updates

White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said at the briefing this afternoon that President Joe Biden has been in contact with Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and is receiving regular updates on government funding talks.

“His team has been in touch with members, congressional members from both sides of the aisle, and certainly, he will continue to stay updated,” she said.

Jean-Pierre also called on the House speaker to come to a solution to fund the government before the shutdown deadline, saying “this is their mess that they created.”

Will D.C. see mountains of trash outside of museums and the National Mall again?

Longtime Washington residents may be accustomed to the unsightly scourge of trash piling up around the National Mall, and outside of Smithsonian museums during federal government shutdowns.

Images of trash piles have been compelling symbols of one impact of past government shutdowns, when the National Park Service was unable to pick up trash at their shuttered sites.

During the last prolonged government shutdown in 2019, D.C.’s local government dispatched extra tag to help keep the garbage cans empty and pick up trash at federal sites, but there’s no word from D.C’s Department of Public Works about whether they plan to do so again in the event of another long shutdown.

Only a third of CDC staff would keep working in a government shutdown

Just 31% of CDC staff will continue working in the event of a government shutdown, according to the agency’s contingency plan. Under a shutdown, the agency will continue its emergency response to urgent disease outbreaks and collecting data reported by states and local hospitals.

But technical assistance to states and local hospitals would cease during a government shutdown. The agency’s research and response to public inquiries about health-related issues would also halt.

Social Security checks continue going out in the case of a shutdown

In the event of a government shutdown, eligible Social Security recipients shouldn’t expect to see lapses in their payments.

But because staffing levels at the agency may be lower than normal, processing time may be extended for the duration of the shutdown.

Millions of people could go without primary health care if the government shuts down

If the government shuts down there will be a swift and major impact on millions of people in the U.S., particularly in underserved areas who will have no access to primary health care. About 32 million people across the country are served by community health center, regardless of their ability to pay.

Federally funded community health centers are non-profit clinics that receive grants from the Health Center Program of the Health Resources and Services Administration. If the grants end, the centers will have no funding for employees or medical care. The Community Health Center Fund provides about 70% of federal money for health centers.

Community Health Centers represent the largest primary care network in the U.S. Health centers have been in existence for nearly 60 years and care for 31.5 million patients nationwide, the vast majority of whom are low-income and need a place to go for affordable care.

Majority Leader Steve Scalise says no consensus, funding vote possible today

House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., briefly emerged from the ongoing closed-door House GOP conference meeting and said that there could be a “technical shutdown” as no final decisions have been made but a vote is still “possible” tonight.

He said that the most likely plan is to move the three bills, including the continuing resolution, separately but added that they are still discussing what to do about Trump’s debt limit demand.

“It wouldn’t necessarily be in this package,” Scalise added. “The debt limit was taken out because the Democrats walked away from that last night.”

Scalise, like Rep. Dusty Johnson, acknowledged there could be at least a brief, technical shutdown. “There may be a technical shutdown over the course of the evening or the weekend. Those generally don’t mean anything,” Johnson said.

However, Scalise said a vote is still possible tonight, saying “we can stave that off.”

Speaker Johnson: “We will not have a government shutdown”

House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., came out of the conference meeting and expressed confidence that there wouldn’t be a government shutdown at 12:01 a.m. tomorrow.

“We have a unified Republican Conference. We have unanimous agreement in the room that we need to move forward. I will not telegraph to you the specific details of that yet,” he said.

“We will not have a government shutdown and we will meet our obligations for our farmers who need aid, the disaster victims all over the country, and for making sure that military and essential services and everyone that relies on the federal government for a paycheck is paid over the holidays,” he added.

House Republicans confident they can vote on a government funding package today

House Republicans leaving the closed-door meeting appeared confident they could vote today on a short-term spending bill, disaster aid and farm bill package — and no debt limit.

They would likely vote under suspension of the rules, which means Republicans would need Democratic support.

Smithsonian museum and the National Zoo can remain open for five days in government shutdown

The Smithsonian advised this afternoon that they have enough prior-year funds to remain open for at least five days if the government shuts down tonight.


Here’s how a shutdown could affect a new Congress and Trump’s inauguration

Trump won’t be sworn in for another month, but a possible government shutdown is raising questions in Washington about how a funding lapse could effect the opening of the next Congress, the certification of Trump’s election and his inauguration.

The short answer: probably not much.

That’s because the employees and functions that support the constitutional duties of the president and Congress — as well as life and property — are exempted from lapses in service.

Though the federal government has never been closed for business in the January following a presidential election, Congress and past administrations — including Trump’s — have plenty of experience with continuing to operate during a shutdown.

On Capitol Hill, parliamentary experts have spent time gaming out what might happen under various scenarios. Here’s what we know — and don’t know — about a first-of-its-kind pre-inauguration shutdown.

The new Congress

Under the 20th amendment to the Constitution, the new Congress convenes at noon on Jan. 3.

A shutdown would not affect that process in its own right because neither lawmakers nor “essential” aides are required to stop working during a shutdown. Some employees deemed “non-essential” would be furloughed, but only those whose jobs are not necessary to lawmaking, security and other functions related to Congress’ constitutional duties.

The administration, which implements shutdown protocols for federal agencies, has no power over congressional employees.

Here’s how a shutdown could affect a new Congress and Trump’s inauguration

Trump won’t be sworn in for another month, but a possible government shutdown is raising questions in Washington about how a funding lapse could affect the opening of the next Congress, the certification of Trump’s election and his inauguration.

The short answer: probably not much.

That’s because the employees and function that support the constitutional duties of the president and Congress — as well as life and property — are exempted from lapses in service.

Though the federal government has never been closed for business in January following a presidential election, Congress and past administrations — including Trump’s — have plenty of experience with continuing to operate during a shutdown.

On Capitol Hill, parliamentary experts have spent time gaming out what might happen under various scenarios. Here’s what we know — and don’t know — about a first-of-it-kind pre-inauguration shutdown.

The New Congress

Under the 20th amendment to the Constitution, the new Congress convenes at noon on Jan. 3.

A shutdown would not affect that process in its own right because neither lawmakers nor “essential” aides are required to stop working during a shutdown. Some employees deemed “non-essential” would be furloughed, but only those whose job are not necessary to lawmaking, security and other functions related to Congress’s constitutional duties.

The administration, which implements shutdown protocols for federal agencies, has no power over congressional employees.

The certification of the election results

While a lapse in federal funding would not stop Congress from carrying out its constitutional duties, the kind of political chaos that led to this month’s shutdown fight could.

Even before lawmakers are sworn in on Jan. 3, the House elected its speaker, which allows for all subsequent business to be conducted. But the current speaker, Mike Johnson, R-La., is on the hot seat — as evidenced by his struggle to find the votes to keep the government open.

In 2023, Republicans took five days — and 15 rounds of voting — to hand the speaker’s gavel to then-Rep. Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., on Jan. 7.

That raises the prospect that the House could fail to elect a speaker before Jan. 6, the day reserved for Congress to certify the electoral votes that will make Trump president.

If there is no speaker, there is no one with the procedural power to start the counting of the electoral votes. Without a speaker, the just-elected lawmakers cannot be sworn in — meaning they could not cast an official vote to certify the electoral votes or to re-open the government.

No one expects Jan. 6, 2025, to be an echo of the same day in 2021, when a mob of pro-Trump loyalists stormed the Capitol in a vain attempt to stop the certification of President Joe Biden’s loss. But a different kind of chaos — a headless House — is a related possibility.

Because the Senate is a “continuing body,” where two-thirds of its members were not on the ballot in November, it doesn’t face the same procedural hurdles.

Parliamentary experts on Capitol Hill have advised House leaders that there are possible workarounds if Republicans have not come to a consensus on who should serve as speaker by Jan. 6.

“One of the things the House can do if there is trouble, they can elect a temporary speaker, or a speaker that is limited in purpose or duration,” said one former House aide who is familiar with the situation and was granted anonymity to speak candidly.

But, as the expert said, “This is all new territory.

The inauguration

Typically, the new president is sworn in by the chief justice of the United States on the West Front of the Capitol — a rare coming together of all three branches of government at the same time and place. It is a major security event that requires intensive coordination among federal agencies and between the administration, Capitol Police and Washington, D.C., law enforcement officers.

There are employees at each of the federal security agencies that would be subject to furlough during a shutdown, but the Office of Management and Budget is clear in its guidance to agencies that workers who support the president’s official actions and provide for public safety should remain at their posts.

For example, the Department of Homeland Security’s contingency plan for a shutdown envisions retaining 150,063 employees who are “necessary to protect life and priority” and 152 who are “necessary to the discharge of the president’s constitutional duties and powers.”

Even the National Park Service, which has responsibility for the grounds of the National Mall and adjacent landmarks, has a plan to make sure a shutdown would not leave its turf littered. The Park Service can use “the minimal level” of its money to “provide critical health, public safety, and protection services as an exempt activity in a manner that maintains restrooms and sanitation, trash collections … law enforcement emergency operations, and the protection of park resources.”

But ahead of the inauguration, officials are busy getting ready to transfer power and information at federal agencies. An administration official said that while the impact is still unclear, a shutdown will make that work harder.

“A shutdown this close to inauguration will be incredibly disruptive the new administration,” this person said. “It will slow down the offboarding and onboarding process and make it far more difficult for the agency landing teams to meet with their outgoing counterparts. We’re in somewhat uncharted territory here, but this is not how to prepare to take office.


McConnell criticizes House lawmakers over looming shutdown

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., this afternoon criticized the House for taking Congress to the brink of another government shutdown.

“I don’t care to count how many times I’ve reminded our colleagues and our House counterparts how harmful it is to shut the government down and how foolish it is to bet your own side won’t take the blame for it,” McConnell said in his last floor speech as Senate Republican leader.

He also urged bipartisanship, noting that “getting a legislative outcome in the Senate requires large majorities of people who don’t share all the same views to actually work toward outcomes where they do see eye to eye.”

“We have a choice: Do nothing, or try to find things we agree on and do them together,” he said.


Federal Firefighters say a shutdown could threaten their battle for higher pay

Federal wild land firefighters are bracing to lose their $20,000 retention bonuses if Congress does not act to prevent a government shutdown that would affect millions of workers before the Christmas holiday.

The firefighters have fought for years to establish a permanent pay fix for a job in which some earn as little as $15 an hour for dangerous, backbreaking work.

“It’s like crying wolf over and over again,” said Bobbi Scopa, with Grassroots Wildland Firefighters, an advocacy organization.

Their battle for higher pay is at risk as congressional leaders scramble to find a path forward before 12:01 a.m. Saturday when the government will shut down if a stopgap funding agreement is not reached.

Some 11,200 federal firefighters received a salary boost in 2021 of either $20,000 or 50% of their base pay under the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. Congress failed to make pay increases permanent and instead extended the bonuses via seven containing resolutions in the years since.

If Congress fails to pass another resolution this week, federal firefighters will not receive their bonuses.

“We will lose everybody,” said Steve Gutierrez, a member of an elite hotshot crew who left the U.S. Forest Service after 15 years to advocate on behalf of firefighters with the National Federation of Federal Employees. “These folks deserve a living wage. The future is going to be a tough road ahead.”

If Congress reached a deal before the deadline, the boosted salary rates would be safe through mid-March.

The U.S. Forest Service did not respond to a request for comment.

With the administration of President-elect Donald Trump scheduled to take over in a month, firefighters and union leaders say their chance to reform the pay scale is slipping away.

During his first term, Trump clashed with Western state governors after catastrophic wildfires consumed millions of acres of public land, and he blame the forest service for mismanagement. In 2018, he suggested California should do a better job of “raking” its leaves.

His new administration is already pushing for less government spending even as climate change stretches the fire season further into the year and makes fires deadlier.

In a recent op-ed published by Fox News, incoming Montana Senator-elect Tim Sheehy, a Republican who was CEO of an aerial firefighting company, argued for “utilizing private resources, which are usually the quickest, most effective response option if we want to limit the size and scope of wildfire damage.

“The private sector always has and always will produce new innovations and better results faster and cheaper than the government,” he wrote. “The same holds true in wildlife response. We must embrace this truth.”

But even municipal firefighters say they depend on federal resources, especially in communities near national forest.

Federal firefighters undergo rigorous training that is a step above what private, state and local crews teach. Their expertise on the front line makes them invaluable in the field and the most sought-after hires by civilian departments.

“Those are the best employees you can get. You know that they’re hungry. They’re amazing.” said Brian Fennessy, fire chief of the Orange County Fire Authority in California and a former hotshot. “It’s sad to watch a once proud agency coming apart like this.”

Firefighters and their advocates have been trapped in a cat-and-mouse game with congressional leaders for decades. Many hoped a permanent solution would be achieved under President Joe Biden, but lawmakers repeatedly punted legislation.

Union leaders were momentarily hopeful when Idaho Rep. Mike Simpson, a Republican and chairman of the House Interior and Environment Appropriations Subcommittee, included a permeant pay fix in the House appropriations bill earlier this year.

In an August op-ed he co-wrote with Rep. Lori Chavez-DeRemer, R-Ore., Simpson decried the current pay structures as inadequate and argued for including a solution in the 2025 fiscal year budget.

“As wildfire seasons grow longer and more intense, the brave men and women on the front lines of these catastrophic blazes are increasingly hailed as heroes,” the op-ed read. “Yet, federal wild land firefighter are frequently subjected to inconsistent compensation despite their essential role in protecting lives, communities, and wildlife. It is well past time to acknowledge their crucial contributions by bringing much needed certainty to pay.”

The House proposal directed $330 million for a pay increase to replace the expiring salary increase and would have included a permanent pay fix, which has since been nixed amid spending disagreements.

Instead, the best firefighters can hope for now is maintaining their current pay through the spring.

“They’re gone for months and they’re making poor wages and in dangerous situations and we’re screwing with these people,” Scopa said. “It’s just unacceptable.”

Frustrated by ongoing problems, federal firefighters have continued to leave the U.S. Forest Service for higher wages at state and local departments. This summer, dozens of federal fire engines remained unstaffed amid another wave of firefighter exoduses.

Advocates for firefighters have repeatedly warned that attrition rates could leave the agency, which protects millions of acres of public land across the country, bereft of its most experienced and skilled workers.

“It’s already pretty bleak,” Gutierrez said.


House is voting now on a new CR

The House is voting now on the new continuing resolution. While its says is a 15-minute vote, that is not firm. The House can keep a vote open as long as needed until the speaker decides to close it.

This bill is under suspension of the rules so it needs 2/3 support to pass. If all current 430 members are present, that number of votes needed is 287.

But if just the 410 members who voted yesterday are there, it’s 274.

Democrats are sill in their caucus meeting, so this vote could take some time

White House says that Biden supports the new funding bill

Biden supports the new bill to fund the government, which Congress is currently voting on, according to the White House.

“President Biden supports moving this legislation forward and ensuring that the vital services the government provides for hardworking Americans — from issuing Social Security checks to processing benefits for veterans — can continue as well as to grant assistance for communities that were impacted by devastating hurricanes,” said White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre in a statement.

House passes government funding bill

The House voted to pass a new bill to fund the government, a step forward in efforts to avoid a government shutdown.

The Senate will have to pass the bill as well.

Schumer says he’s “confident’ the Senate will pass the House CR

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said in a statement following the House vote passing the CR that he’s “confident” the Senate will also pass the measure.

“Though this bill does not include everything Democrats fought for, there are major victories in this bill for American families — provide emergency aid for communities battered by natural disasters, no debt ceiling, and it will keep the government open with no draconian cuts,” he said.

“As I have said, the only way to keep the government open is through bipartisanship,” he added.

The Senate must follow the House and pass the bill in order to send it to Biden’s desk and stave off a shutdown.

Speaker Mike Johnson says he is ‘grateful’ that the House did ‘the right thing’

Shortly after the funding bill passed the House, Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters that he was “grateful” that members of Congress passed the CR.

“We encourage swift passage in the Senate now,” he said. “They need to do their job as the House just did.”

Johnson added that he spoke with Trump and Musk recently as well.

Trump “knew exactly what we were doing and why, and — and this is a good outcome for the country.I think he certainly is happy about this outcome as well,” Johnson said.

When asked by NBC News whether Johnson still wants to be the House speaker, Johnson said that his job “is a challenge in this modern era, but it’s a challenge that we accept.”

“It’s a great honor to serve in the position,” he said. “I wouldn’t say it’s the most fun job in the world all the time, but it’s an important one, a hugely consequential moment for the country.”

Jeffries says House Republicans ‘stopped extreme MAGA Republicans’ in continuing resolution vote

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., said that it was House Democrats who “successfully funded the government” in a “victory for the American people.”

“House Democrats have successfully stopped extreme MAGA Republicans from shutting down the government, crashing the economy and hurting working-class Americans all across the land,” Jeffries said in remarks after the continuing resolution vote tonight.

Senate working to lock down a time agreement to pass funding bill tonight

The government funding bill is finally in senators’ hands, and members of the upper chamber are currently working to get a time agreement to pass the continuing resolution tonight.

They will need the consent of all 100 senators to speed up the clock and pass a stopgap bill to avert a shutdown by midnight tonight.

“We’re working through the amendment process right now,” Schumer said when asked whether there will be a vote before midnight.”

There will likely be a series of amendment votes in order for them to get an agreement, but those amendments are expected to fail. If they were adopted, the House would have to come back to vote on the amended legislation.

If the Senate rolled past the midnight deadline, the shutdown would likely only be for a couple of hours and have minimal impact on the functions of the federal government.

The Senate is also working on the Social Security Fairness Act, which it could loop into the same time agreement and pass tonight.

Senate passes funding for pediatric cancer after it was stripped out of the original CR

Sen. Tim Kaine, D-VA, obtained unanimous consent via voice vote for funding of the Gabriela Miller Kids First Research Act 2.0 on the floor tonight.

The legislation reauthorizes funding of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) for pediatric cancer after it was stripped out of the original bipartisan deal on Wednesday. The bill reauthorizes through FY2028 a pediatric disease research initiative within NIH and requires the NIH to coordinate pediatric research activities to avoid duplicative efforts.

The legislation passed the House in March and has been sitting in the Senate since.

Democrats in the House and Senate have criticized Republicans over the last few days for taking out key provisions from the bipartisan deal, most notably pediatric cancer funding. However, the legislation that passed the Senate tonight is not exactly the same a the language the original deal and is ultimately less money overall. per Kaine.

Schumer says both parties have reached an agreement on the spending bill

Speaking on the Senate floor tonight, Schumer said that the exact timing for a vote on the continuing resolution hadn’t yet been determined but that it would be passed before the 12:01 a.m. ET deadline.

“Democrats and Republicans have reached — just reached an agreement that will allow us to pass the CR tonight before the midnight deadline,” he said.

White House: Agencies ‘will not shut down’

It is past midnight, but the government will not shut down while the Senate finishes up its votes, the White House confirmed.

The Office of Management and Budget “has ceased shutdown preparations because there is a high degree of confidence that Congress will imminently pass the relevant appropriations and the President will sign the bill on Saturday,” White House Senior Deputy Press Secretary Emilie Simmons posed on X.

Senate voting now on bill to avoid a shutdown

The Senate is voting now on a continuing resolution to keep the government open until March 14th, 2025. There is a 60-vote threshold, and it is expected to pass.

Speaking on the floor prior to the vote, Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said, “Tonight the Senate delivers good news for America” There will be no government shutdown right now before Christmas. … After a chaotic few days in the House, it’s good news that the bipartisan approach prevailed. It’s a good lesson for next year.”

This is the last vote of the 118th Congress.

Senate passes bill to avoid a government shutdown, ending funding fight

The Senate gave final passage to a bill early Saturday morning to keep the government open for three more months, sending it to President Joe Biden’s desk to end the threat of a government shutdown during the holidays.

The vote was 85-11.

the Republican-controlled House passed the bill hours earlier. Although the final vote technically crossed the midnight deadline to avert a shutdown, the White His said that Biden would sign the bill Saturday and avoid forcing U.S. troops, Border Patrol agents, air traffic controllers and millions of other federal workers without pay.

That’s all, folks

That was the last vote of the 118th Congress.

When the Senate returns in a few weeks, on Jan. 3, Republicans will be in charge. Democrats will be cut down to 47 seats. Sens. Joe Manchin, D-W.V.; Krysten Sinema, I-Ariz; Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio; Jon Tester, D-Mont.; Rand Paul, R-Ky.; and Mike Lee, R-Utah; will be committee chairmen.

The House, with an even smaller Republican majority than they had this Congress, will need to start the new session by electing a speaker.


December 20, 2024: ABC News reported “House passes bill to avert government shutdown”

The House of Representatives passed the two-thirds majority to pass the funding bill to avert a federal shutdown tonight. The bill, which funds the government until March, will head to the Senate.

December 20, 2024: NBC News reported: “Senate passes bill to avoid a government shutdown, ending funding fight at the 11th hour”

It was written by Scott Wong, Sahil Kapur, Ali Vitali, Julie Tsirkin, Kyle Steward, and Kate Santaliz

The Senate gave the final passage to a bill early Saturday morning to keep the government open for three more months, sending it to President Joe Biden’s desk to end the threat of a government shutdown.

The vote was 85-11.

The Republican-controlled House passed the bill hours earlier. Although the final vote technically went past the midnight deadline to avert a shutdown, the White House said that Biden would sign the bill Saturday and avoid forcing U.S. troops, Border Patrol agents, air traffic controllers and millions of other federal workers to work without pay.

“Agencies will not shut down and may continue normal operations,” Emilie Simons, White House Senior Deputy Press Secretary, posted on X.

The House voted 366-34, with all opposition coming from Republicans and one member voting present. It capped a tumultuous week that foreshadowed how the new Congress in January might deal with a mercurial Donald Trump back in the White House.

The package funds the government at current levels through March 14, and includes $100 billion in disaster aid and one-year far bill — while stripping out a debt limit extension demanded by President-elect Trump earlier in the week.

On Wednesday, Trump had threatened to primary “Any Republican” who voted for a funding bill without a debt limit extension; on Friday, 170 House Republicans did just that.

“We are really grateful that tonight, in bipartisan fashion, with overwhelming majority of votes, we passed the American Relief Act of 2025. This is a very important piece of legislation,” House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., told reporters after the vote. “It funds the government, of course, until March of 2025. That was a big priority for us.”

He vowed that “things are going to be very different around here” next year when Trump returns and Republicans capture the Senate.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D. N.Y., called it “good news” late Friday that the Senate had reached unanimous agreement to skip the usual hurdles and speedily pass the funding bill.

Just three days ago, House and Senate leaders from both parties struck an agreement to keep the government’s lights on, but Trump and his billionaire confidante Elon Musk killed the deal, insisting at the eleventh hour it needed to extend or abolish the debt limit to make way for Trump’s agenda next year.

A backup plan — slimmed down from the original deal and endorsed by Trump and Musk — went down in flames on the House floor, tanked by Democrats as well as 38 Republicans who objected to the debt extension.

That left Johnson, who is fighting to keep his speakership, with few good options. After privately huddling with rank-and-file Republicans for more than two hours Friday, Johnson told his party he was pressing forward with Plan C: the same package brought to the floor a day earlier but without Trump’s debt increase.

Exiting the private GOP meeting, Johnson told reporters there would not be a shutdown and that House Republicans are “unified.”

“We will not have a government shutdown, and we will meet our obligations for our farmers who need aid, for disaster victims all over the country, and for making sure that the military and essential services and everyone who relies upon the federal government for a paycheck is paid over the holidays,” Johnson said.

Johnson said he spoke to Trump and Musk on Friday. “I’ve talked to President Trump, in detail, and he knows exactly what we’re doing,” the speaker said.

Musk appeared to endorse the plan as the House was voting, writing on his social media site X that Johnson “did a good job here, given the circumstances.”

The president-elect had chosen to remain silent on the bill, according to another source familiar with his thinking. Trump’s preference was still to address the debt ceiling, that source said, adding, “Johnson should have listened when the President-elect told him this a month ago. And in every conversation since.”

But Trump may be willing to take a “win” on a funding deal the cuts a significant amount of what he say as “pork,” the source continues, noting that the process gave Trump’s team insight into where votes are in both parties for dealing with the debt limit next year.

To get around Trump’s last-minute demand of raising the debt ceiling, Republicans have instead agreed to commit to slash more than $2 trillion in government spending and tuck a debt hike likely into a reconciliation package next year, according to multiple lawmakers.

Some Republicans doubt the debt limit pack is worth the paper it’s printed on.

“They call the a gentleman’s agreement, I think,” said Rep. Tim Burchett, R-Tenn. “And there are no gentlemen up here, dude.”


December 21, 2024: The White House reported: “Statement from President Joe Biden on the Bipartisan Government Funding Bill”

The bipartisan funding bill I just signed keeps the government open and delivers the urgently needed disaster relief that I requested for recovering communities as well as the funds needed to rebuild the Francis Scott Key Bridge.

This agreement represents a compromise, which means neither side got everything it wanted. But it rejects the accelerated pathway to a tax cut for billionaires that Republicans sought, and it ensures the government can continue to operate at full capacity.

That’s good news for the American people, especially as families gather to celebrate this holiday season.

December 21, 2024: “Press Release: Bill Signed: H.R. 10545”

On Saturday, December 21, 2024, the President signed into law:

H.R. 10545, the “American Relief Act, 2025”, which provides fiscal year 2025 appropriations to Federal agencies through March 14, 2025, for continuing projects and activities of the Federal Government; provides disaster relief appropriations and economic assistance to farmers; extends the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018; and extends several expiring authorities.


December 21, 2024: CNN Politics posted: “Here’s what’s in and out of the government funding agreement” It was posted by Katie Lobosco and Tami Luhby.

The Senate approved slimmed-down, temporary government spending plan early Saturday morning, averting a shutdown of the federal government. President Joe Biden signed the bill into law later Saturday morning.

The passage of the package came after President-elect Trump torpedoed a bipartisan agreement struck earlier in the week. A House vote on a Trump-endorsed funding bill failed on Thursday evening, but the chamber then approved a revised bill Friday evening.

The legislation funds the government through March 14, setting up another spending shutdown in the early days of the Trump administration. Republicans will control both the Senate and the House come January, but the party will have slim margins in both chambers.

The package also retains billions of dollars in disaster relief sorely needed by states hit hard earlier his year by two major hurricanes.

Here is what else is in the bill:

More disaster aid funding

The spending bill provides about $100 billion to help Americans trying to recover from multiple national disasters in 2023 and 2024. The funding is in line with the roughly $100 billion topline request from the Biden administration in November.

Some $29 billion will help replenish the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Disaster Relier Fund, which has dwindled after contending with two major hurricanes that ripped through the Southeast earlier this year, as well as other disasters.

In October, FEMA spend $9 billion of a $20 billion infusion from Congress, responding to Hurricanes Helene and Milton. The agency also had to handle wildfires, floods, and tornadoes this year. Federal data shows the costly disasters are now happening more frequently.

Economic aid for farmers

The bill includes $10 billion economic aid for farmers, one of the last sticking points in negotiations earlier this week. Lawmakers from agriculture-focused states have argued that the help is desperately needed as the US’s famers are facing lower commodity prices and higher costs for supplies.

The spending agreement also includes a one-year extension of the farm bill — a sweeping package that governs many agricultural and nutrition assistance programs. Typically, the bill is renewed every five years, but the most recent version was passed in 2018 and the extension lapsed at the end of September. The continuing resolution extends it for a year.

Maryland bridge funding

Under the bill, replacing the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Maryland will be fully funded by the federal government. The legislation will also allow the US Treasury Department to recoup money from any settlements related to the bridge’s collapse to help pay for the rebuilding.

A cargo ship crashed into the bridge in March, causing it to collapse and severing access to critical shipping rounds in and out of the Port of Baltimore. Six workers on the bridge were killed.

Rebuilding the bridge could cost between $1.7 billion and $1.9 billion, according to an estimate released by the Maryland Transportation Authority earlier this year.

Extending Telehealth flexibilities in Medicare

The funding agreement also includes a three-month extension of a pandemic-era measure that expanded the use of telehealth in Medicare.

More senior citizens and Americans with disabilities have been able to get care via telehealth since the COVID-19 pandemic began in early 2020. Eligibility for the service was broadened beyond just those living in rural areas, and seniors have been able to conduct the telehealth visit at home, rather than having to travel to a heath care facility.

December 21, 2024: ABC News posted “Biden signs short-term government funding bill”

President Joe Biden signed into law the short-term funding bill on Saturday, according to a release from the White House. Biden signed the bill this morning after lawmakers sent it to his desk after late-night negotiations.

December 21, 2024: The White House posted: “Press Release: Bill Signed: HR 10545”

On Saturday, December 21, 2024, the President signed into law:

H.R. 10545, the “American Relief Act, 2025”, which provides fiscal year 2025 appropriations to Federal agencies through March 15, 2025, for continuing projects and activities of the Federal Government; provides disaster relief appropriations and economic assistance to farmers; extends the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018; and extend several expiring authorities.

The bill extends funding for the government until mid-March, has $100 billion for disaster aid, something the White House wanted, and extends funding for farmers.


December 22, 2024: Reuters reported: “Senate passes government funding bill, averts shutdown” It was written by Richard Cowan, Bo Erickson, Andy Sullivan, and Katherine Johnson.

The U.S. Congress passed spending legislation early on Saturday in a down-to-the-wire burst of activity that will avert a destabilizing government shutdown ahead of the busy holiday travel season.

The Democratic-controlled Senate in a 85-11 vote passed the bill to continue government funding 38 minutes after it expired at midnight (0500 GMT Saturday). The government did not invoke shutdown procedures in the interim.

The bill will now be sent to the White House, where President Biden is expected to sign it into law.

The package had earlier cleared the Republican-controlled House of Representatives with bipartisan support.

The late-night vote capped a frantic week that saw President-elect Donald Trump and his billionaire ally Elon Musk defeat an initial bipartisan deal, throwing Congress in disarray.

The final version stripped out some provisions championed by Democrats, who accused Republicans of caving in to pressure from an unelected billionaire who has no experience in government.

Congress did not act on Trump’s demand to raise the debt ceiling, a politically difficult task, before he takes office on Jan. 20.

The federal government spent roughly $6.2 trillion last year and has more than $36 trillion in debt, and Congress will need to act to authorize further borrowing by the middle of the year.

The legislation would extend government funding until March 14, provide $100 billion for disaster-hit states and $10 billion for farmers, and extend farm and food aid programs due to expire at the end of the year.

Some Republicans voted against the package because it did not cut spending. House Speaker Mike Johnson said the party will have more influence next year, when they will have majorities in both chambers of Congress and Trump will be in the White House.

“This was a necessary step to bring the gap, to put us in that moment where we can put our fingerprints on the final decisions on spending,” he told reporters after the House vote. He said Trump supported the package.

A government shutdown would have disrupted everything from law enforcement to national parks and suspended paychecks for millions of federal workers.

A travel industry trade group warned it could cost airlines, hotels and other companies $1 billion per week and lead to widespread disruptions during the busy Christmas season. Authorities warned travelers could face long lines at airports.

THIRD ATTEMPT

The package resembled a bipartisan plan that was abandoned earlier this week after an online fusillade from Trump and Musk, who said it contained too many unrelated provisions, such as a pay raise for lawmakers and a crackdown on pharmacy benefit managers.

Republicans struck most of those elements from the bill — including a provision limiting investments in China which Democrats said would have conflicted with Musk’s interests.

“He clearly does not want to answer questions about how much he plans to expand his businesses in China and how many American technologies he plans to sell,” Democratic Representative Rosa DeLauro said on the House floor.

Trump has tasked Musk, the world’s richest person, with heading a budget-cutting task force but he will hold no official position in Washington.

Musk wrote on his social media platform X that he was happy with the package. “It went from a bill that weighted pounds to a bill that weighted ounces,” he posed.

House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries said his party still achieved some of its goals and prevented Republicans from enacting a debt-ceiling hike that would make it easier to cut taxes.

“We have successfully advanced the needs of everyday Americans, but there are still things to be worked on and we look forward to the fight in the new year,” he told reporters.

Trumps demand to life the debt ceiling was resoundingly rejected by the House — including 38 Republicans — on Thursday.

Johnson said lawmakers would look at the issue in January.

Representative Rich McCormick, one of the 34 Republicans who voted against the Friday bill, said it did nothing to change the nation’s fiscal trajectory and would only add to the debt load.

“We will be the country of the past if we continue doing what we’re doing,” he said.

The federal government last shut down for 35 days during Trump’s first White House term over a dispute about border security.

Previous fight over the debt ceiling have spooked financial markets, as a U.S. government default would send credit shocks around the world. The limit has been suspended under an agreement that technically expires on Jan. 1, though lawmakers likely would not have had to take the issue before the spring.


Biden-Harris 0 comments on Biden signs a bill officially making the bald eagle the national bird of the U.S.

Biden signs a bill officially making the bald eagle the national bird of the U.S.

photo of a bald eagle flying in a clear blue sky by Mathew Schwartz on Unsplash

December 24, 2024: NBC News reported: “The bald eagle is officially America’s national bird after Biden’s signature” It was written by Doha Mandani.

The bald eagle has landed in the U.S. code after President Biden signed a bill Tuesday making the predator the official national bird.


Congress passed the measure with unanimous support.

Although the bird of prey is at the center of the Great Seal of the United States, it was never formerly recognized as the country’s official bird. Some of the Founding Fathers — Benjamin Franklin, John Adams, and Thomas Jefferson — were tasked with creating a national seal but simply couldn’t come to an agreement.

In 1782, a version of the seal with a bald eagle was submitted by Secretary of the Continental Congress Charles Thomson and approved. Most Americans are familiar with the seal’s eagle carrying a flag-emblazoned shield holding an olive branch in one talon and arrows in the other.

Franklin was historically against the decision, arguing in a letter to his daughter that the bad eagle was “a bird of bad moral character.”

Either way, the U.S. has not had an official bird in the almost 250 years since its founding.

Minnesota resident Preston Cook had long hoped that the eagle would ascend into the U.S. code, even writing a draft a bill and sending it to lawmakers.

Cook described himself as having a lifelong obsession with the bald eagle, and took it upon himself to push for a change when discovering that there was no official U.S. bird. He wrote a simple piece of legislation that would change the code to say that, “The bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) is the national bird.

Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., then led a bipartisan group who brought it to the Senate floor in July. It passed unanimously before sailing through the House last week with no opposition.

“The bald eagle is a symbol of our country’s freedom and strength with our legislation now signed into law, the bald eagle is officially our national bird,” Klobuchar said on Thursday.

Cook told NBC News earlier this month that this is one overlooked piece of history he felt compelled to fix.

“No one has to change anything; it’s just a correction. It is only a correction in history to make things right and makes things the way they should be,” Cook said.

December 25, 2024: ABC 13 Eyewitness News reported the bald eagle, a symbol of the power and strength of the United States for more than 240 years, earned an overdue honor on Tuesday: It officially became the country’s national bird.

President Joe Biden signed into law legislation sent to him by Congress that amends the United States Code to correct what had long gone unnoticed and designate the bald eagle — familiar to many because of its white head, yellow beak and brown body — as the national bird.

The bald eagle has appeared on the Great Seal of the United States, which is used in official documents, since 1782, when the design was finalized. The seal is made up of the eagle, an olive branch, arrows, a flag-like shield, the motto “E Pluribus Unum” and a constellation of stars.

Congress that same year designated the bald eagle as the national emblem, and its image appears in a host of places, ranging from documents and the presidential flag to military insignia and U.S. currency, according to USA.gov.

But it had never been officially designated to be what many had just assumed it was — the national bird.

The bald eagle is indigenous to North America.

December 26, 2024: USA TODAY reported: “The bald eagle’s soaring comeback: From near extinction to official US bird.” It was written by Jeanine Santucci.

The bald eagle, with its history as the symbol of the nation going back over 200 years, made a roaring comeback from near extinction to becoming America’s official bird this week.

President Joe Biden signed a bipartisan bill Tuesday that designated the bald eagle as the national bird. Despite appearing on the Great Seal of the U.S. since 1782, the bald eagle has never legally been recognized as the national bird until now.

With its distinctive brown body, white head and yellow beak, the bald eagle grasps an olive branch and arrows in his talons on the seal, which is used on official documents, military uniform buttons and every U.S. passport.

Though it’s the “most pictured bird in all of America,” according to the Department of Veterans Affairs, the bald eagle has had to overcome threats to its very existence.

America’s bird: The ball eagle joins the rose, the bison, and the oak tree as an official American symbol.

How did the bald eagle become a national symbol?

The bald eagle first emerged as a national symbol when it appeared on an early Massachusetts copper cent in 1776, the VA said in a publication on the bird.

After the Declaration of Independence was signed that year on July 4, a committee was formed to design a seal of the new nation. It took six years and three committees before the seal that we know today was decided on. Secretary of the Continental Congress Charles Thomson made the design, which was adopted on June 20, 1782.

“The olive branch and the arrows held in the eagle’s talons denote the power of peace and war. The eagle always casts its gaze toward the olive branch signifying that our nation desires to pursue peace but stands ready to defend itself,” the National Museum of American Diplomacy says.

“The fierce beauty and proud independence of this great bird aptly symbolizes the strength and freedom of America,” John F. Kennedy once wrote of the bald eagle.

In the mid-1900s, the bald eagle’s existence was threatened by a combination of habitat destruction, illegal shooting and insecticides contaminating the bird’s food source, according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Some bald eagles were shot because they were seen as a risk to chickens and livestock.

It’s believed that there were about 100,000 nesting bald eagles in the U.S. when it was first adopted as the American symbol. The decline started in the 1800s, along with a decline in the populations of other species of birds, the Wildlife Service said.

In 1963, there were only 417 known nesting pairs of bald eagles, putting the species in danger of extinction. After the Endangered Species Act of 1973 was signed, bald eagles in the contiguous 48 states were listed as endangered except in Michigan, Minnesota, Oregon, Washington, where they were listed a threatened.

Congress moved to protect bald eagles in 1940 with the Bald Eagle Protection Act, which was later amended to include golden eagles. Its later addition to the list of endangered species also led to conservation and recovery efforts, the Wildlife Service said.

By 1998, the bald eagle had recovered enough that its status was changed to threatened. In 2007, officials said there were over 9,000 nesting pairs of bald eagles in the contiguous states — and the birds were removed from the list altogether.

As of estimates in 2018 and 2019, there are now about 316,700 bald eagles, including 71,467 breeding pairs, in the lower 48 states.

California 0 comments on Bird Flu Update: California declares emergency

Bird Flu Update: California declares emergency

flock of birds flying together by Mendi Sepheri on Unsplash

December 18, 2024: NPR reported: California Gov. Gavin Newsom has declared a state of emergency in response to the spread of bird flu among dairy cattle.

The declaration is a sign of growing concern over the situation in California, which has become the epicenter of the nation’s outbreak in cattle.

More than 300 dairy herds have tested positive in California in the last 30 day alone.

The governor said that cases detected in dairy cows on farms in Southern California showed that expanded monitoring and a more coordinated statewide response is needed in response statewide response is needed in to the outbreak.

“This proclamation is a targeted action to ensure government agencies have the resources and flexibility they need,” Newsom said in a statement.


“While the risk to the public remains low, we will continue to take all necessary steps to prevent the spread of this virus.”

California currently accounts for about half of known human infections in the U.S.

There’s no evidence of ongoing human to human spread in California or the rest of the country. But scientists warn that uncontrolled spread in dairy cattle heightens the risk of spillover into humans, which could give the virus a chance to acquire dangerous mutations.

The move also comes on the heels of another troubling development — the country’s first case of sever illness detected in a human.

On Wednesday, officials with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention shared additional finding about that infection in a resident of Louisiana who was hospitalized after being exposed to sick and dead birds in backyard flocks.

Genetic sequencing indicates the H5N1 virus responsible for the illness belongs to a genetic lineage that’s circulating in wild birds and poultry — different from what’s spreading in dairy cattle and driving the majority of infections in agricultural workers.

In the U.S., more than 60 people have been infected so far, although some research suggests the official tally may be an undercount.

The illness linked to dairy cattle have largely led to mild illness in humans.

The version of the virus in the Louisiana case is the D1.1 genotype. It has previously popped up in poultry workers in Washington state, who developed mild symptoms after testing positive in October. More recently, however, a teenager in British Columbia was hospitalized after contracting this D1.1 strain of the virus.

Canadian health officials were unable to figure out how that person got infected.

The case in southwest Louisiana was detected during routine flu surveillance and eventually sent to the CDC for confirmation. The case doesn’t change the CDC’s assessment that the risk to the general public remains low.

Still, the hospitalization is a refined that bird flue has a well-established history of leading to severe illness and death over the past 20 years in other countries, Dr. Demetre Daskalakis with the CDC, told reporters on Wednesday during a press call.

Daskalakis said his agency is doing additional sequencing to look for any worrying changes in the virus that could signal it’s evolving to better infect humans or cause more severe disease.

Scientists were concerned that the case in British Columbia exhibited certain mutations that could spell trouble, although more research was needed to understand the exact implications.

Daskalakis revered reporters to Louisiana officials conducting the investigation into the case for further details on how the person caught the virus and their symptoms.

As with the Louisiana infection, most cases have been linked back to some kind of exposure to sick animals. Dairy cattle harbor high loads of virus in their milk and that’s expected to be causing infections in farm workers. Those working with infected poultry can also catch the virus.

However, several cases have cropped up in the U.S. that can’t be tracked back to infected farm animals, including California and Missouri.

“Infections without a clear source of exposure do occur, neither these cases, nor the cases with known animal or animal products exposure have resulted in human to human transmission,” said Daskalakis.


December 26, 2024: CDC posted about Avian Influenza (Bird Flu)

Genetic Sequences of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A (H5N1) Viruses identified in a person in Louisiana

WHAT TO KNOW

CDC has sequenced the influenza virus in specimens collected from the patient in Louisiana who was infected with, and became severely ill from HPAI A(H5N1) virus. The genomic sequences were compared to other HPAI A(H5N1) sequences from dairy cows, wild birds, and poultry, as well as previous human cases and were identified as the D1.1 genotype.

The analysis identified low frequency mutations in the hemagglutinin gene of a sample sequenced from the patient, which were not found in tissue virus sequence from poultry samples collected on the patient’s property, suggesting the changes emerged in the patient after infection.

BACKGROUND

This is a technical summary of an analysis of the genomic sequences of the viruses identified in two upper respiratory tract specimens from the patient who was severely ill from an infection with highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI)A(H5N1) virus in Louisiana. The patenting was infected with A(H5N1) virus of the D1.1 genotype virus that is closely related to other D1.1 viruses recently detected in wild birds and poultry in the United States and in recent human cases in British Columbia, Canada, and Washington State.

This avian influenza A(H5N1) virus genotype is different from the B3.13 genotype spreading widely and causing outbreaks in dairy cows, poultry, and other animals, with sporadic human cases in the United States.

Deep sequencing of the genetics sequences from two clinical specimens from the patient in Louisiana was preformed to look for changes associated with adaptation to mammals.There were some low frequency changes in the hemagglutinin (HA) gene segment of one of the specimens that are rare in people but have been reported in previous cases of A(H5N1) in other countries and most often during severe infections.

One of the changes found was also identified in a specimen collected from the human case with severe illness detected in British Columbia, Canada, suggesting they emerged during the clinical course as the virus replicated in the patient. Analysis of the N1 nueraminidase (NA), matrix (M) and polymerase acid (PA) genes from the specimens showed no changes associated with known or suspected markers of reduced susceptibility to antiviral drugs.

CDC Update

December 26, 2024: – CDC has sequenced the HPAI A(H5N1) avian influenza viruses in two respiratory specimens collected from the patient in Louisiana who was severely ill from an A(H5N1) virus infection. CDC received two specimens collected at the same time from the patient while they were hospitalized for severe respiratory illness: a nasopharyngeal (NP) and combined NP/oropharyngeal (OP) swab specimens.

Initial attempts to sequence the virus from the patient’s clinical respiratory specimens using standard RNA extraction and multisegment RTPC (M-RTPCR) techniques yielded only partial genomic data and virus isolation was not successful. Nucleic acid enrichment was needed to sequence complete genomes with sufficient coverage depth to meet quality thresholds.

CDC compared the influenza gene segments from each specimen with A(H5N1) virus sequences from dairy cows, wild birds, poultry and other human cases in the U.S. and Canada….

…The NP specimen, notably, did not have these low frequency changes indicating they may have been detected from swabbing the oropharyngeal cavity of the patient. While these lose frequency changes are rare in humans, they have been reported in previous cases of A(H5N1) in other countries and most often identified in a specimen collected from the severe human case detected in British Columbia, Canada.

This summary analysis focuses on mixed nucleotide detections a residues A135AV, N182K, E186D as these changes may result in increased virus binding to a2-6 cell receptors found in the upper respiratory tract of humans. It is important to note that these changes represent a small proportion of the total virus population identified in the sample analyzed (i.e., the virus still maintains a majority of ‘avian’ amino acids at the residues associated with receptor binding).

The changes observed were likely generated by replication of this virus in the patient with advanced disease rather than primarily transmitted at the time of infection. Comparison of influenza A(H5) sequence data from viruses identified in wild birds and poultry in Louisiana, including poultry identified on the property of the patient, and other regions of the United States did not identify these changes.

Of note, virus sequences from poultry sample on the patient’s property were nearly identical to the virus sequences from the patient but did not hav mixed nucleotides identified in the patient’s clinical sample, strongly suggesting that the changes emerged during infection as virus replicated in the patient.

Although concerning, and a reminder that A(H5N1) viruses can develop changes during the clinical course of a human infection, these changes would be more concerning if found in animal hosts or in early stages of infection (e.g., within a few days of symptom onset) when these change might be more likely to facilitate spread to close contacts.

Notably, in this case, no transition from the patient in Louisiana to other persons has been identified. The Louisiana Department of Public Health and CDC are collaborating to generate additional sequence data from sequential patient specimens to facilitate further genetic and virology analysis…


December 21, 2024: The Associated Press reported: “California declared an emergency. How serious is bird flu?” It was written by Jones Aleccia.

California officials have declared a sate of emergency over the spread of bird flu, which is tearing through dairy cows in that state and causing sporadic illnesses in people in the U.S.

That raises new questions about the virus, which has spread for years in wild birds, commercial poultry and many mammal species.

The virus, also known as Type A H5N1, was detected for the first time in U.S. dairy cattle in March. Since then, bird flu has been confirmed in at least 866 herds in 16 states.

More than 60 people in eight states have been infected, with mostly mild illnesses, according to the U.S. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. One person in Louisiana has been hospitalized with the nation’s first known severe illness caused by the virus, health officials said this week.

Why did California declare a state of emergency?

Gov. Gavin Newsom said he declared the state of emergency to better position state staff and supplies to respond to the outbreak.

California has been looking for bird flu in large milk tanks during processing. And they have found the virus in at least 650 herds, representing about three-quarters of all affected U.S. diary herds.

The virus was recently detected in Southern California dairy farms after being found in the state’s Central Valley since August.

“This proclamation is a targeted action to ensure government agencies have the resources and flexibility they need to respond quickly to this outbreak,” Newsom said in a statement.

What’s the risk to the general public?

Officials with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention stressed again this week that the virus poses low risk to the general public.

Importantly, there are no reports of person-to-person transmission and no signs that the virus has changed to spread more easily among humans.

In general, flu experts agreed with that assessment, saying it’s too soon to tell what trajectory the outbreak could take.

“The entirety unsatisfactory answer is going to be: I don’t think we know yet,” said Richard Webby, an influenza expert at St. Jude Children’s Hospital.

But virus experts are wary because flu viruses are constantly mutating and small genetic changes could change the outlook.

Are cases becoming more serious?

This week, health officials confirmed the first known case of severe illness in the U.S. All the previous U.S. cases — there have been about 60 — were generally mild.

The patient in Louisiana, who is older than 65 and had underlying medical problems, is in critical condition. Few details have been released, but officials said the person developed severe respiratory symptoms after exposure to a backyard flock of sick birds.

That makes it the first confirmed U.S. infection tied to backyard birds, the CDC said.

Tests showed that the strain that caused the person’s illness is one found in wild birds, but not in cattle. Last month, health officials in Canada reported that a teen in British Columbia was hospitalized with a severe case of bird flu, also with the virus strain found in wild birds.

Previous infections in the U.S. have been almost all in farmworkers with direct exposure to infected dairy cattle or poultry. In two cases — an adult in Missouri and a child in California — health officials have not determined how they caught it.

It’s possible the as more people become infected, more severe illnesses will occur, said Angela Rasmusen, a virus expert at the University of Saskatchewan in Canada.

Worldwide, nearly 1,000 cases of illnesses caused by H5N1 have been reported since 2003, and more than half of people infected have died, according to the World Health Organization.

How can people protect themselves?

People who have contact with dairy cows or commercial poultry or with backyard birds are at higher risk and should use precautions including respiratory and eye protection and gloves, CDC and other experts said.

“If birds are beginning to appear ill or die, they should be very careful about how they handle those animals,” said Michael Osterholm, a public health expert at the University of Minnesota.

The CDC has paid for flu shots to protect farmworkers against seasonal flu — and against the risk that the workers could become infected with two flu types at the same time, potentially allowing the bird flu virus to mutate and become more dangerous. The government also said that farmworkers who come in close contact with infected animals should be tested and offered antiviral drugs even if they show no symptoms.

How else is the bird flu being spread?

In addition to direct contact with farm animals and wild birds, the H5N1 virus can be spread in raw milk. Pasteurized milk is safe to drink, because the heat treatment kills the virus, according to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

But high levels of the virus have been found in unpasteurized milk. And raw milk sold in stores in California was recalled in recent weeks after the virus was detected at farms and in the products.

In Los Angeles, county official reported that two indoor cats that were fed the recalled raw milk died from bird flu infections. Officials were investigating additional reports of sick cats.

Health officials urge people to avoid drinking raw milk, which can spread a host of germs in addition to bird flu.

The U.S. Agriculture Department has stepped up testing raw milk across the country to help detect and contain the outbreak. A federal order issued this month requires testing, which began this week in 13 states.


December 27, 2024: MSNBC reported: “What to know about the spread of the bird flu” It was written by Clarissa-Jan Lim

The spread of the bird flu among humans and other mammals in the United States has sparked some concern among public health experts in recent weeks, though U.S. officials say the risk it currently poses to the public is low.

Since the first reported outbreak among dairy cattle in March, this particular bird flu virus, H5N1, has spread across hundreds of herds in more than a dozen states. More recently, authorities have reported at least two severe human cases in North America and issued recalls of pet and human foods due to bird flu contamination.

Here’s what to know about the outbreak.

How does bird flu spread?

Avian flu, commonly known as bird flu, has been around for decades, but a recent increase in cases among wild birds likely led to an outbreak among dairy cows in Texas earlier this year, according to the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Since then, bird flu has been detected in other animals; last week, an animal sanctuary in Washington state announced that 20 of its big cats had died of confirmed cases of bird flu.

Bird flu may be transmitted through exposure to infected animals, such as consuming undercooked or raw meat from infected animals or directly handling such animals. An Oregon-based company issued a voluntary recall of raw and frozen pet food this week after a housesat died of bird flu.

Earlier this month, the California Department of Public Health suspended the distribution of Raw Farm raw milk products after milk samples tested positive for bird flu virus. No illnesses were reported in connection with the contaminated raw milk.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture has said poultry and eggs, if properly handled and cooked, are safe from viruses and bacteria, including bird flu.

How many human cases in the U.S.?

There have been 65 recorded human cases of bird flu in the U.S. this year. a vast majority of which was due to exposure associated with dairy cow and poultry operations, according to the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention. In November, a child in California was determined to have been infected with bird flu, the CDC said.

There is no evidence of human-to-human transmission, and infections in humans have largely been mild. But authorities have not been able to locate a source of infection in several human cases, and two severe cases among people — one in British Columbia and one in Louisiana — have alarmed experts.

In November, a previously healthy teenager in British Columbia, Canada, contracted a severe case of bird flu. Local authorities said this week that there was no evidence of human-to-human transmission from the patient, though they could not locate the source of the teenager’s infection. The patient is still in critical condition.

The U.S. similarly recorded its first severe case of bird flu in a case in Louisiana last week, after suspected contact with an infected backyard flock. The patient was hospitalized in critical condition. A genetic analysis of samples from the patient revealed that the virus may have mutated in the patient to become more transmittable among humans, the CDC said Thursday, but there is no evidence thus far that it has passed along.

The Louisiana patient was infected with “a strain of the virus different from the one affecting dairy cows and causing sporadic cases in farmworkers in the U.S.,” NBC News reported.

How dangerous it is?

For now, public health authorities say the overall risk of bird flu to the public is low, given that it has not developed a proven ability to transmit from human to human. However, some experts fear the virus could further mutate to do so. They point to the urgent need to eliminate the virus — or at least slow its spread before it turns into a full-blown pandemic.


July 3, 2024: The Hill posted: “Fourth human bird flu case tied to dairy cow outbreak reported”

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported on Wednesday the fourth human case of bird flu linked to the ongoing dairy cow outbreak in the country, marking the first such case reported in Colorado.

All four cases were reported in people who work on dairy farms where cows tested positive for the H5N1 strain of the virus. Since March, two cases have been identified in Michigan and one case identified in Texas. The cases are all unrelated, the CDC said.

The Colorado man, as with the first two human patients, reported only pink eye symptoms, which the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environmental (CDPHE) described as “mild.” In the third case, identified in Michigan in late May, the person experienced respiratory symptoms including cough without fever and eye discomfort with watery discharge.

The Colorado patients took the antiviral Tamil, and has recovered, the CDC said.

The CDC said the risk to the general public remains low. There is a greater risk, however, for people with “close or prolonged, unprotected exposures to infected birds or other animals (including livestock), or to environments contaminated by infected birds or other animals,” according to the CDC.

“The risks to most people remains low, CDPHE state epidemiologist Rachel Herlihy said in a statement. “Avian flu viruses are currently spreading among animals, but they are not adapted to spread from person to person. Right now, the most important thing is to know that people who have regular exposure to infected animals are at increased risk of infection and should take precautions when they have contact with sick animals.”

The Colorado man was being monitored, as he is a farmworkers who had exposure to infected cattle. He reported his symptoms to state health officials, who conducted tests that were inconclusive. The CDC conducted tests that came back positive.

The CDC has been monitoring states’ flu surveillance systems, “and there has been no sign of unusual influenza activity in people, including in syndromic surveillance,” according to the CDC.

Still, health officials are warning the public to be vigilant about only drinking milk that is pasteurized an only eat “properly handled and cooked dairy, beef, and poultry products.” The CDPHE warned Coloradans not to touch sick or dead animals. If they must do so, the CDPHE said, people should wear personal protective equipment including an N95 respirator, eye protection and gloves.


Biden-Harris 0 comments on Biden Signs 50 Bills Into Law on Christmas Eve

Biden Signs 50 Bills Into Law on Christmas Eve

photo of U.S. Capitol from Unsplash.com

President Biden signed 50 bills into law on Christmas Eve, as the year and his time in officer draw to a close, CBS News reported. It was written by Kathryn Watson.

The bills Mr. Biden signed included socialite and activist Paris Hilton’s bill to protect teenagers living in residential treatment facilities, a bill setting anti-hazing standards on college campuses, and a bill preventing member of Congress from collection pensions if convicted of certain crimes.

Hilton is the force behind the Stop Institutional Child Abuse Act, which passed the House and Senate last week. The legislation creates a federal work group on youth residential programs to oversee health, safety, care, treatment and placement in rehab and other facilities. The new law is personal for Hilton, who has testified before Congress that she faced abuse in such facilities as a teen.

Another measure the president signed, S. 933, prohibits members of Congress convicted of crimes related to public corruption from receiving their retirement payments. Previous law allowed members to continue to receive checks only after the exhaustion of all appeals. The new bipartisan law comes after Sen. Bob Menendez of New Jersey was found guilty this year of using his political influence to benefit businessmen and foreign governments in return for bribes.

The Stop Campus Hazing Act requires higher education institutions to disclose hazing incidents reported to campus or local police authorities in their annual security reports. The new law also requires schools to teach students about the dangers of hazing, among other things.

Yet another new law, S. 4610, makes the bald eagle the official bird of the U.S. The federal government had never designated an official bird.

On Monday, the president granted clemency to 37 of the 40 federal inmates facing death sentences, commuting their sentences to life in prison without the possibility of parole. The move prompted both consternation and praise.

Mr. Biden also vetoed a bill on Monday that would have created 66 new federal judgeships, saying the House had rushed it through without resolving important issues about how it would be implemented.

December 23, 2024: The Whit House posed: “FACT SHEET: President Biden Commutes the Sentences of 37 Individuals on Death Row”

Today, President Biden announced that he is commuting the sentences of 37 individuals on federal death row. Those individuals will have their sentences reclassified from execution to life without the possibility of parole.

President Biden has dedicated his career to reducing violent crime and ensuring a fair and effective justice system. He believes that America must stop the use of the death penalty at the federal level, except in cases of terrorism and hate-motivated mass murder — which is why today’s actions apply to all but those cases.

When President Biden came into office, his Administration imposed a moratorium on federal executions, and his actions today will prevent the next Administration from carrying out the execution sentences that would not be handed down under current policy and practice.

This historic clemency action builds on the President’s record of criminal justice reform. The President has issued more commutations at this point in his presidency than any of his recent predecessors at the same point in their first terms.

Earlier this month, the President announced clemency for approximately 1,500 Americans – the most ever in a single day – who have shown successful rehabilitation and a commitment to making communities safer. This included sentence commutations for nearly 1,500 individuals who were placed on home confinement during the COVID-19 pandemic and who have successfully reintegrated into their families and communities, as well as 39 pardons for individuals who were convicted of non-violent crimes.

President Biden is also the first President ever to issue categorical pardons to individuals convicted of simple use and possession of marijuana, and to former LGBTQI+ service members convicted of private conduct because of their sexual orientation.

The President’s criminal justice record has transformed individual lives and positively impacted communities, especially historically marginalized communities. In the coming weeks, the President will take additional steps to provide meaningful second chances and continue to review additional pardons and communities. In the coming weeks, the President will take additional steps to provide meaningful second chances to review additional pardons and commutations…

The Hill reported: “Biden signs 50 bills, including 1 backed by Paris Hilton, on Christmas Eve”

President Biden spent Christmas Eve signing new bills into law approving everything from the county’s official bird to protections for children in youth care facilities.

Stop Institutional Child Abuse Act

Celebrity singer and actress Paris Hilton has spent months pushing for a federal law that will hold treatment centers and care facilities serving youth accountable. She made frequent appearances on Capitol Hill to encourage lawmakers to pass the Stop Institutional Child Abuse Act in the House and Senate.

December proved to be a fruitful month as the Senate unanimously approved the measure and the House voted 367 to 33, sending the bill to Biden’s desk. He signed the act into law on Tuesday, securing a political victory for Hilton, who expressed potential interest in serving as an elected official.

Stop Campus Hazing Act

Biden also passed a law that creates disclosure regulations for federally funded higher learning institutions, requiring them to include reports of hazing in their annual security report. The bill was sponsored by Reps. Lucy McBath (D-Ga.) and Jeff Duncan (R-S.C.) in the House in addition to Sens. Amy Klobachar (D-Minn.) and Bill Cassidy (R-La.)

Hazing is frequently discovered to be part of college pledging processes for on-campus fraternities and sororities. More than half of college students are involved in some form of campus hazing, according to North Carolina State University.

Post office designations

The president signed two bills renaming local postal offices to honor community leaders in the state of Texas and California.

The site at 1106 Main St. in Bastrop, Texas, is now the Sargent Major Billy D. Waugh Post Office, in honor of a CIA ineligence officer and Army soldier who served the country for more than five decades.

Sens. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and John Cornyn (R-Texas) sponsored the legislation.

San Francisco will rename a post office in honor of the late Sen. Diane Feinstein (D-Calif.), thanks to a bill sponsored by Sens. Laphonza Butler (D-Calif.) and Alex Padilla (D-Calif.)

Federal building renamings

Biden signed several bills to rename federal buildings. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) community clinic in Lynchburg, Va., will now be known as the Private First Class Desmond T. Doss VA Clinic.

The medical center of the VA in Tulsa, Okla., was renamed after the late Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.). Sens. James Lankford (R-Okla.) and Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.) sponsored the bill.

The late Sen. Paul Sarbanes (D-Md.) also earned a special honor at the Fort McHenry National Historic Monument and Historic Shrine in Baltimore, Md., as the Paul S Sarbanes Visitor and Education Center will become his namesake.

The effort was sponsored by the senator’s son, Rep John Sarbanes (D-Md.), along with the state’s congressional delegation.

U.S. Official Bird

While the bald eagle has long been the official mascot of the U.S., Biden singed the first legislation to make that official on Christmas Eve.

The Biden administration also pumped out last-minute surprises, including pardons for federal death row inmates, throughout the course of his last month in office. He will transfer the commander in chief role to President-elect Trump in January.

Animal Crossing Pocket Camp 0 comments on Animal Crossing Pocket Camp Complete

Animal Crossing Pocket Camp Complete

Animal Crossing Pocket Camp Complete is the newest version of Animal Crossing Pocket Camp. In this blog post, I have collected up some screenshots that connect to “Toy Day”.

Jingle is a reindeer who carries a large sack on his back. He is dressed in a Santa Claus outfit. “Ho Ho Hoo there! It’s me! I’m here! It’s Toy Day season again!”


“When I get overexcited, I like to relax by staring at candlelights.”

“This year, I’m planning a candle Toy Day with a super relaxed vibe!”

“Well, this is rather sudden but, I’d like you to grow cyclamen in your garden.”

Snowy Toy Day dress

festive garland

snow-globe and candle set

white candle tree

candlelit white sofa

candlelit gift set B

snow-globe candle set

candlelit Toy Day tree

candlelit hearth

striped Toy Day pj bottoms

striped Toy Day pj top

striped Toy Day night cap

handheld Toy Day gift

My Pocket Camp character is wearing the striped pjs and a striped hat.

Trump Lawsuits 0 comments on Insurrectionists Are Facing Consequences – Part 8

Insurrectionists Are Facing Consequences – Part 8

photo of U.S. Capitol by Louis Velasquez on Unsplash

Those who attacked their own nation’s Capitol failed to consider the consequences of doing so. This is part 6.

On January 6, 2021, a mob of Donald Trump supporters staged an insurrection at the U.S. Capitol building. The Guardian reported that people stormed the chambers of the House and Senate while the Electoral College does were being tallied.


Guy Wesley Reffitt of Texas

March 8, 2022: NPR reported: “In the first Jan. 6 trial, a jury found Capitol riot defendant Guy Reffit guilty” It was written by Tom Driesbach.

A little more than a year after a group of pro-Trump rioters overwhelmed police, stormed the Capitol and temporarily halted the country’s peaceful transfer of power, a jury has unanimously returned a verdict in the first trial stemming from he events on Jan. 6, 2021:

Guilty on all counts.

The defendant, 49-year-old Guy Wesley Reffitt of Texas, was found guilty of these five criminal charges: transporting a firearm in furtherance of a civil disorder; obstruction of an official proceeding; entering or remaining in a restricted area of grounds with a firearm; obstructing officers doing a civil disorder; and obstruction of justice — hindering communication through force or threat of physical force.

It took two days to seat a jury made up of Washington, D.C., residents. Many potential jurors said they lived or worked near the Capitol building — the scene of multiple crimes in this case — or even knew Capitol Police officers who were injured that day, which complicated jury selection.

Judge Dabney Friedrich sought jurors who could keep an “open mind,” despite anything they had heard before. The jury ultimately included employees of NASA and the Department of Defense, as well as a public school maintenance supervisor.

After opening statements, four days of often emotional testimony and closing arguments in a courthouse located on a short walk away from the Capitol, that jury took under four hours to reach its verdict.

Many of the 700-plus defendants charged in connection with the Capitol riot have been closely watching the outcome of his trial as they weight how to approach their own cases. It is widely believed that this guilty verdict will give prosecutors additional leverage in plea negations with other defendants.

When the verdict was read aloud, Reffitt showed little emotion.

At one point during the proceedings, he turned to his wife, Nicole Reffitt, who was sitting in the courtroom. They locked eyes, put their hands on their chests and nodded at one another.

Nicole Reffitt spoke to reporters outside the courthouse soon after. She encouraged other Jan. 6 defendants, whom she referred to as “1/6ers,” not to plead guilty.

“Guy was used as an example to make all the 1/6ers take a plea.” she said. “Do not take a plea, 1/6ers. Do not.”

She said that her husband would appeal the ruling and that “this fight has just begun.”

Prosecutors accused Reffitt of traveling to Washington, D.C., with a fellow member of a far-right militia organization called the Texas Three Percenters.

Testimony and evidence showed that Reffit brought an AR-15 rifle and a pistol with him on the trip. He took that pistol with him to the Capitol grounds on Jan. 6, along with zip-tie-style flex cuffs, a helmet and body armor.

A demonstrators approached the building, Reffitt started ascending a stairwell in front of the Capitol guarded by a handful of police officers. Those officers testified that Reffitt told them, “You can’t stop us all. Let us in. Don’t be a traitor.” Officers shot at Reffitt with pepper balls and plastic less-lethal rounds and ultimately stopped him with pepper spray. As Reffitt sat in the stairwell, trying to wash the spray from his eyes, video showed him waving rioters forward.

Reffitt did not enter the building himself or make physical contact with any police officers. But Assistant U.S. Attorney Risa Berkower described Reffitt as the “tip of the mob’s spear” who gave rioters the window of opportunity to ultimately overwhelm the police line and take over the Capitol building.

When Reffitt returned home to Texas, he bragged in text messages and on recorded Zoom meetings about leading the charge on Jan. 6. His the-18-year-old son, Jackson Reffitt, had liberal political views and was troubled by what his father had done, so he began secretly recording his father.

Within days, Guy Reffitt became paranoid about being arrested. Jackson Reffitt testified at the trial that his father told him and his younger teenage sister, “If you turn me in, you’re a traitor. And traitor’s get shot.” Jackson Reffitt turned over the recordings he made of his father to the FBI. Five days alter, agents arrested Guy Reffitt.

At trial, prosecutors presented what they referred to as a “mountain of evidence.” That evidence included text messages; extensive video, including some recorded by Reffitt’s helmet-mounted camera on Jan. 6; a recorded Zoom meeting between Reffitt and members of his militia; and the audio recordings made by Jackson Reffitt.

Prosecutors backed up that evidence with testimony from Capitol Police officers who tried to stop Reffitt’s approach on the building; Rocky Hardie, a former member of the Texas Three Perceners who accompanied Reffitt on the trip to Washington and who was granted immunity for his testimony; and the defendant’s son, Jackson Reffitt.

The testimony of son against father made for the most dramatic and emotional day of testimony. Jackson Reffitt described the guilt and discomfort he felt about informing on his dad and how he felt “terrified” when his father told him that “traitors get shot.” Jackson Reffitt had been largely estranged from his family seen turning his father in to the FBI. At the beginning of his son’s testimony, Guy Reffitt began sobbing in the courtroom.

Inspector Monique Moore of the Capitol Police also became emotional when describing the panicked calls for help on the radio from police battling the rioters.

Reffitt’s criminal defense attorney, William Welch, called no witnesses, and his cross-examination of the government’s witnesses were generally brief. His open statement lasted just three minutes.

Welch described the government’s prosecution as a “rush to judgement” based on hyperbolic claims from Reffitt that should not be taken seriously. “Guy does brag, he exaggerates and he rants,” said Welch. The defense flatly denied that Reffitt had a gun with him on Jan. 6. Prosecutors contradicted that claim with an image of Reffitt on the Capitol steps with a holster holding a shiny object, multiple recorded statements by Reffitt saying he had his handgun on him and testimony from Reffitt saying he had his handgun on him and testimony from Reffitt’s fellow militia member.

At other times, Welch said the prosecution’s video evidence could be a “deepfake” — falsified computer-generated footage — or be otherwise manipulated. Welch presented no evidence to support that claim.

He also pressed Jackson Reffitt on Guy Reffitt’s drinking and use of Xanax, suggesting that Guy Reffitt may have been under the influence when he made the statements heard on recordings. Welch raised the possibility that Jackson Reffitt turned his father in for fame and fortune and asked about the many media interviews Jackson Reffitt has given and the money he has raised on the crowdfunding site GoFundMe. Jackson Reffitt flatly denied Welch’s insinuation during his testimony.

In his brief closing argument, Welch again insisted that Guy Reffitt was unarmed and urged the jury to convict Reffitt on a single leaser charge of entering and remaining in a restricted area — a misdemeanor.

The jury appeared to reject all of Welsh’s arguments and sided with the Department of Justice.

In a statement, the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, Matthew M. Graves, said the jury “held Guy Reffitt accountable for his actions on Jan. 6, 2021, finding him guilty of five felony charges. I would like to thank the jury for upholding the rule of law and for its diligent service in this case.”

The FBI’s Washington Field Office said in a statement: “Rather than take responsibility for his actions at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, Mr. Reffitt opted to put his family through a painful trial. Today’s guilty verdict in the first jury trial of a Jan. 6 defendant should serve as a reminder for others who committed crimes at the Capitol that day that these are serious charges and the FBI and our law enforcement partners will do what it takes to hold them accountable.”

Reffitt’s sentencing hearing is set for June 8.

August 1, 2022: Office of Public Affairs U.S. Department of Justice posted: “Texas Man Sentenced to 87 Months in Prison for Actions Related to Capitol Breach.

Defendant Carried Loaded Gun Onto Capitol Grounds, Led Charge Against Law Enforcement, Later Sought to Obstruct Justice

A Texas man was sentenced today to 87 months in prison on civil disorder, obstruction of justice, and other charges for his actions before, during, and after the breach of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. His and others’ actions disrupted a joint session of the U.S. Congress convened to ascertain and count the electoral votes related to the presidential election.

Guy Wesley Reffitt, 49, of Wylie, Texas, was the first to stand among hundreds of defendants charged in connection with the Jan. 6, 2021 breach of the Capitol. He was found guilty by a jury in the District of Columbia on March 8, 2022, of five charges, including two counts of civil disorder and one count each of obstruction of an official proceeding, entering and remaining in a restricted building or grounds with a firearm, and obstruction of justice.

“Guy Reffitt came to the Capitol on Jan. 6 armed and determined to instigate violence,” said Matthew M. Graves, U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia. “In his own words, his goal was to take the Capitol “before the day is over.” He and others contributed to the many assaults on law enforcement officers that day, putting countless more people — including legislators — at risk. The jury’s verdict and today’s sentence hold him accountable for his violent, unconscionable conduct.”

“Today’s sentence reflects the seriousness of the crimes committed by Mr. Reffitt, and underscores the wanton disregard he had for one of the pillars of our democracy — the peaceful transition of power,” said Assistant Director in Charge of Steven M. D’Antuono of he FBI Washington Field Office. “The FBI and our law enforcement partners continue to be steadfast in our commitment to ensure that all individuals who committed crimes on January 6 are held to account for their actions.”

According to the government’s evidence, Reffitt was a member of the Texas Three Percenters, a military organization. He sent messages recruiting others in the group to join him in traveling to Washington D.C. on Jan. 6, 2021. Among other things, he told the group, “we will strike the match in D.C. on the 6th.” Another militia member joined Reffitt, and the two left Texas on Jan. 5 for a trip of more than 1,000 miles in Reffitt’s car. Both men brought along handguns and AR-style rifles.

On the morning of Jan. 6, both men went to a rally on the Ellipse before heading to the Capitol. They were wearing body armor and carrying handguns, flexi-cuffs, and radios for communication. Reffitt also had a megaphone as well as a helmet with a camera mounted on the top for recording purposes. His mission, according to the evidence, was to stop Congress from acting. He was especially targeting Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell. He told members of his militia group and those gathered around him at the Ellipse that he planned to physically drag Speaker Pelosi out of the Capitol Building by her ankles.

Reffitt repeatedly made statements recorded by his helmet camera while at the Ellipse on Jan. 6, including one in which he declared, “We’re taking the Capitol before the day is over.”

By approximately 1:50 p.m, Reffitt was at the front of a pack that charged the U.S. Capitol Police officers at the terrace on the west side of the Capitol building. He climbed a banister, led the mob up staircases outside the Capitol building, and kept advancing on the officers holding the police line, even as he was struck repeatedly by the officers’ less than lethal projectiles and O.C. spray.

As he kept moving, Reffitt urged others to keep moving forward, too. He eventually made it up the stairs to outside the Senate wing of the Capitol, as others breached the building, but he did not personally go inside. While narrating a video he recorded that day, he stated, “I said I wasn’t leaving till I got in there. I didn’t make it in there. But I started the fire.”

Reffitt later boasted about his actions in conversations with his traveling companion as well as in messages and a meeting with other militia members. On Jan. 9, 2021, for instance, he wrote, “We took the Capitol of the United States of America and we will do it again.”

But his mood quickly changed. On Jan. 10, 2021, after learning that the Texas Three Percenters’ leader had been questioned by Texas law enforcement agents, Reffitt sent messages to several other group members, urging them to “Start purge of all previous conversations. NOW.” Heeding his own advice, he deleted from his iPhone a Telegram message thread between himself and the militia leader in which he disclosed his plans to be armed while attacking the Capitol.

Reffitt also told his family what he had done and threatened his teenage children to prevent them from reporting him to law enforcement.

Reffitt was arrested on Jan, 16, 2021, and he has been detained ever since. In a search of his home, FBI agents located the AR-15 style rifle and Smith & Wesson .40-caliber pistol that Reffitt had brought into Washington. They also located an illegal firearm suppressor, cans of bear spray, flexi-cuffs, and other items.

Following his prison term, he will be placed on three years of supervised release. He also must pay $2,000 in restitution.

The case was prosecuted by the US. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia. Valuable assistance was provided by the Department of Justice National Security Division’s Counterterrorism Section and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern and Northern Districts of Texas.

The case was investigated by the FBI’s Washington Field Office, the Frisco Resident Agency of the FBI’s Dallas Field Office, and the Austin Resident Agency of the FBI’s San Antonio Office. Valuable assistance was provided by the U.S. Capitol Police.

In the 18 months since January 6, 2021, more than 850 individuals have been arrested in nearly all 50 states for crimes related to the breach of the U.S. Capitol, including over 260 individuals charged with assaulting or impeding law enforcement. The investigation remains ongoing.

August 1, 2022: BBC reported: Guy Reffitt: Capitol rioter turned in by son gets 87 months in prison”. It was written by Sam Cabral & Tara McKelvey.

A Texas Man who joined the US Capitol riot armed with a holster pistol and threatened his son to keep quiet about his role has been sentenced to more than seven years in prison.

Guy Reffitt, 49, was found guilty in March on five felony counts, including obstruction of an official proceeding and interfering with police in a riot.

His sentence is the longest imposed on any of the US Capitol rioters.

Nearly 900 people have been charged in the 6 January 2021 raid on Congress.

Reffitt did not actually enter the Capitol with the horde of Trump supporters who breached the complex as lawmakers met to certify Joe Biden’s win in the November 2020 presidential election.

He retreated after an officer pepper sprayed him in the face, but video evidence showed Reffitt egging on the crowd and leading other rioters up a set of stairs outside the building.

Multiple videos Reffitt took on and after 6 January, in which he discussed planning and bragged about participating in the riot, were used in evidence against him.

Issuing a prison sentence of 87 months on Monday, US District Judge Dabney Friedrich said Reffitt’s actions and statements were “frightening claims that border on delusional.”

An oil-field worker and recruits for the far-right Three Percenters militia, Refit is said to have driven from Texas to Washington, D.C., and led fellow Three Percenters up the main staircase to the Capitol building.

According to court papers, he had told fellow members of the militia that he had planned to drag US House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi out of the Capitol building by her ankles, “with her head hitting every step on the way down.”

Reffitt was reported to the FBI by his son, Jackson, 18 at the time, who told investigators his father had threatened him.

“He said ‘if you turn me in, you’re a traitor,” the younger Reffitt said at his father’s trial earlier this year. “And traitors get shot.”

The sentence Judge Friedrich handed down was slightly below what is recommended by federal guidelines. She also declined to apply a domestic terrorism enhancement — the first requested in a US Capitol riot case.

The Texan wore an orange prison jumpsuit at the Washington DC courthouse and listened carefully as the judge credited supportive statements from Reffitt’s family for the lower sentence.

Analysts say Reffit’s sentence shows that government prosecutors may have a harder time than expected in securing the length of custodial terms they believe US Capitol rioters deserve.

Prosecutor had sought a 15-year prison term, arguing Reffitt was “in a class all by himself” among Capitol riot defendants, and other rioters were “looking to him as their leader.”

But defense lawyers had argued the attack would have happened with or without him and noted he had no criminal history.

Having declined to testify at trial, Reffitt apologized in a brief statement before his sentencing, saying he had “an issue with just rambling an saying stupid [expletive]”.

His family, including his wife, sat in the court’s third row, and his daughter Peyton spoke on his behalf.

“He says a lot of things he doesn’t mean. His mental health is an issue,” she said, visibly emotional.

She added: “My father’s name wasn’t on the flags everyone was carrying that day.

“It was another man’s name,” she added in an apparent reference to former US President Donald Trump.

His wife, Nicole Reffitt told reporters the trial show that “corrupt, evil politicians her in this city” are trying to undermine US civil liberties.

“This isn’t just about Guy Wesley Reffitt. This isn’t about just January 6th. This is about our liberties being stomped on,” she argued.

December 6, 2024: The Associated Press posted: “The first rioter tried on Jan. 6 charges gets reduced prison sentence after Supreme Court decision” It was written by Michael Kunzelman.

A Texas man who was the first rioter to go on trial for the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol was resentenced on Friday to nearly seven years in prison after he delivered an angry, profane rant to the judge who agreed to modestly reduce his original sentence.

Guy Reffitt benefited from a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that led to the dismissal of his conviction on an obstruction charge. His new sentence — six years and eight months — is seven months lower than his original sentence.

Reffit repeatedly shook his head and appeared to be agitated as he listened to U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich and a prosecutor describe his role in the mob’s attack on the Capitol. He told the judge that he was “in my feelings” and upset about the “lies and craziness” that he perceived.

“I was not here to take over no government,” Reffitt said. “I love this country.”

“No one has a problem with your feelings,” the judge said. “It’s the actions you took with your feelings.”

Reffitt stormed the Capitol with a holstered handgun on his waste. He also was carrying zip-tie handcuffs and wearing body armor and a helmet equipped with a video camera when he advanced on police officers outside the building. He retreated after an officer pepper sprayed him in the face, but he waved on other rioters who ultimately breached the building.

Prosecutors said Reffitt told fellow members of the Texas Three Percenters militia group that he planed to drag House Speaker Nancy Pelosi out of the Capitol building by her ankles, “with her head hitting every step in the way down.”

“His objective was to overtake Congress, physically and with violence,” said Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Nestler.

“In his own words,” Nestler added, “Congress was the demon and he was going to cut the head off the demon.”

Reffitt is one of several Jan. 6 defendants to be resentenced after a Supreme Court ruling in June limited the government’s use of a federal obstruction law. The high court ruled 6-3 that a charge of obstructing an official proceeding must include proof that a defendant tried to tamer with or destroy documents — a distinction that applies to few Jan. 6 criminal cases.

A jury convicted Reffitt of four other counts, including a charge that he threatened his two teenage children after returning to their home on Wylie, Texas, after the riot. Reffitt’s son Jackson, then 19, testified that his father told him and his younger sister, then 16, that they would be traitors if they reported him to authorities and warned them that “traitors get shot.”

Reffitt’s two daughters spoke favorably of their father during his resentencing. They descried him as a caring father who doesn’t pose a danger to anybody.

Prosecutors said Reffitt’s recent communications from jail indicate that he “views his imprisonment as an injustice and as part of a greater cause, and that he maintains pride in his actions on January 6 and his involvement in the community of those who he believes have been wrongly prosecuted for their crimes on that day.”

More than 1,500 people have been charged with Capitol riot-related crimes. About 1,000 of them have pleaded guilty. Roughly 250 others have been convicted by a judge or jury after a trial.


The ‘Cowboys for Trump’ Guy

March 18, 2024: NBC News reported: “Supreme Court turns away ‘Cowboys for Trump’ co-founder ousted from office over Jan. 6” It was written by Lawrence Hurley.

The legal argument that worked for President Donald Trump failed to deliver for one of his supporters Monday as the Supreme Court turned away a New Mexico man who was kicked out of local office over his role in the events of Jan. 6.

Couy Griffin, a founder of Cowboys for Trump, was criminally convicted over his role in the Jan. 6 riot and lost his job as a county commissioner as a result.

The lawsuit brought against him by New Mexico residents cited the same constitutional provision that Trump successfully argued in a separate case and could not be used to throw him off the ballot in Colorado.

Both cases concerned Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which says that those who previously took an oath to the Constitution while holding a government position but later “engaged in insurrection” cannot hold office.

Griffin had been hoping that a victory for Trump could help him, as well.

But when the Supreme Court ruled for Trump in that case March 4, it made it clear that the ruling applied only to those running for federal office.

“We conclude that states may disqualify persons holding or attempting to hold state office. But states have no power under the Constitution to enforce Section 3 with respect to federal offices, especially the presidency,” the court said.

As a result, Griffin’s case was effectively resolved. The court rejected his appeal Monday without comment.

“Very disappointed. I don’t even know what to say,” Griffin said on X. “But I thank you for your prayers and for standing with me through this.”

The lawsuit seeking to throw Griffin out of office was brought by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, the group that filed the Trump ballot lawsuit.

The Supreme Court’s actions in the two cases make it clear that “it is up to the states to fulfill their duty to Section 3 to remove from office anyone who broke their oath by participating in the Jan. 6 insurrection,” Noah Bookbinder, the group’s president, said in a statement Monday.

A state judge removed Griffin from his position as a commissioner in Otero County, New Mexico, in September 2022 after concluding that his actions on Jan. 6, 2021, made him ineligible to serve.

Earlier that year, Griffin was convicted of illegally entering the Capitol grounds, although he was acquitted of engaging in disorderly conduct during chaotic scenes in which Trump supporters attempted to prevent Congress from certifying Joe Biden’s election win.

Section 3, enacted after the Civil War, prevents anyone who previously took an oath to defend the Constitution from holding various government offices. It was passed to prevent former Confederates from returning to government but has rarely been enforced.

March 22, 2022: NPR reported: ‘Cowboys for Trump’ leader is given a mixed verdict in his Jan. 6, Captol riot trial” It was written by Allison Molenkamp.

A federal judge found a New Mexico elected official and founder of “Cowboys for Trump” guilty on one count and not guilty on another in the second trial relating to the Jan. 6, 2021, U.S. Capitol insurrection.

Couy Griffin, a county commissioner in Otero County, N.M., was charged with two counts: entering a restricted area and engaging in disorderly conduct. Griffin was found guilty of entering the restricted area and acquitted of the disorderly conduct charge.

Prosecutors alleged Griffin climbed over an outer wall and then went up a temporary staircase to an outside deck at the Capitol. Judge Trevor McFadden, presiding over what was the firs bench trial related to the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, said evidence showed Griffin crossing three walls and that Griffin would have seen fencing in the area.

“All of this would suggest to a normal person that perhaps you should not be entering the area,” said McFadden, who was appointed to the U.S. District Court of the District of Columbia in 2017 by then-President Donald Trump.

Unlike many charged in the insurrection, Griffin, who waived his right to a trial by jury, was not accused of entering the Capitol building itself or of assaulting any law enforcement officers.

In addressing the disorderly conduct charge, McFadden pointed to a montage of other video footage from Jan. 6, including conduct he seemed to see as more disruptive than Griffin’s.

“The defendant is never seen engaging in the kind of property destruction or physical violence seen in the government’s montage,” McFadden said.

The mixed verdict represents a partial victory for the government, which succeeded in establishing that the Capitol grounds were an area protected by the Secret Service on the day of the riot.

Since Griffin’s actions and statements on Jan. 6 were well-documented, the government’s case against him hinged mostly on legal definitions: what were the bounds of the restricted area, what authority set it, and did Griffin’s conduct reach the bar of “disorderly.”

The prosecution, led by Senior Assistant U.S. Attorney Janani lyengar, argued that Struck’s videos showed Griffin knew what he was doing wrong.

“We don’t have to rely on inferences, we have the defendant’s own statements that he knew this area was restricted, and he entered anyway,” Iyengar said in a closing statement, referring to comments Griffin made after the riot about the area around the Capitol being roped off on Jan. 6.

The government also argued the any reasonable person would have understood the Capitol grounds and inauguration state were off limits to the public.

Iyengar also pointed to testimony from a Secret Service witness saying the continued presence of unauthorized individuals within the restricted area forced then-Vice President Mike Pence to remain evacuated throughout the riot.

The trial marked the first time the government has acknowledged Pence, and his family’s location during the Capitol riot: an underground loading dock near the Capitol Visitor Center. The government has sought repeatedly to shield this information from the public, due to security concerns.

Judge McFadden, however said that Griffin had the right to probe this evidence in open court. Pence’s location was the key to proving Griffin violated the law regarding restricted areas.

The Justice Department has charged many defendants under the same statute as Griffin, which depends on an area being restricted due to the presence of a Secret Service protectee.

If Judge McFadden had ruled that the restricted area no longer included the Capitol because Pence went underground, that ruling could have caused ripple effects in the hundreds of other Jan. 6 cases.

Defense attorney Nicholas Smith argued the area around the Capitol was restricted by the U.S. Capitol Police, not by the Secret Service, and therefore not governed by the particular statute Griffin was charged under.

Smith also argued that Griffen did not know he’d entered a restricted are at all, pointing to a lack of “Do Not Enter” signs in the specific area of the boundary Griffin crossed.

The prosecution argued that the restricted area of the Capitol grounds was well-marked, including with bike racks and signs from the U.S. Capitol police.

Inspector John Erickson of the Capitol Police also testified that law enforcement used flashing and chemical irritants to clear the lower west terrace of the Capitol during the riot, suggesting the area was clearly off limits.

On the charge of disorderly conduct, the prosecution pointed to Griffin’s loud speeches, including one in which he said, “we’re not going anywhere, we aren’t taking no for an answer. We’re not gonna get our election stolen from us from China. This is an American that’s had enough right here.”

The defense tried to turn the disorderly conduct charge into a first amendment free speech question. Smith pointed to the steps and lawn of the Capitol as a public forum, where Griffin has a “constitutional right” to make speeches as seen in the videos.

As long as Griffin did not incite violence, Smith argued, Griffin’s speech was protected. Smith pointed to witness testimony from Struck saying when Griffin led a prayer the crowd was calmed, some even kneeling.

McFadden repeatedly drew a distinction between the lawn of the Capitol and the inaugural stage itself on the question of the Capitol grounds as a public forum. He also noted that while some members in the crowd knelt in response to the prayer, others chanted “Pray for Trump.”

Griffin did not testify in the trial, but sat at the defense table. He arrived the first day in a black cowboy hat and black western-style jacket.

Griffin has drawn media attention before. Shortly after Jan. 6, he said in a Facebook video that “we could have a Second Amendment rally on those same steps that we had that rally yesterday. You know, and if we do, then It’s gonna be a sad day because there’s gonna be blood running out of that building.”

After the trial, Griffin told reporters, “I wear January 6 as a badge of honor.”

Griffen is scheduled to be sentenced in June of this year.

He is only the second person to go to trial in connection with the Jan. 6 attack. The first trial resulted in a unanimous guilty verdict on all five felony charges, after the jury deliberated for just two hours.

According to an NPR database tracking the charges related to Jan. 6, nearly 800 people have been charged with crimes stemming from the Capitol riot, and more than 230 have pleaded guilty to one or more charges.

June 17, 2022: CBS News reported: “New Mexico county commissioner and Cowboys for Trump founder Couy Griffin sentenced for Jan. 6 conviction” It was written by Robert Legare and Scott MacFarlane.

The founder of the “Cowboys for Trump” organization and commissioner of Otero County, New Mexico, Couy Griffin, was sentenced Friday to 14 days in jail, a $3,000 fine, 60 hours of community service and a year of supervised release on Friday after being convicted of entering restricted U.S. Capitol grounds on Jan. 6, 2021.

Griffin, who has been in jail for 20 days, will revive credit for time served and will not have to serve additional time.

Griffin was found guilty in March of the misdemeanor, which carries a maximum sentence of one year in prison. A federal judge acquitted him of another misdemeanor charge of disorderly conduct in a bench trial during which the judge, not a jury, renders the verdict.

Judge Trevor McFadden ruled the Griffin was guilty of the charge the arose from his illegal entry of U.S. Capitol grounds in the vicinity of then-Vice President Mike Pence, who was in the Capitol building for the counting of the Electoral College votes and remained in the Capitol complex during the riot.

Prosecutors had said Griffin should get 90 days in prison with credit for the 20 days he has already served, contending that despite statements to the contrary, Griffin has shown a lack of remorse for his actions. Referring the split ruling one conviction and one acquittal rendered by McFadden, prosecutors noted the Griffin tweeted in the weeks after his trial and criticized the judge.

“The 1 I lost will appeal. We SHOULD have won a grand slam on both counts,” Griffin tweeted. “McFaddens PRE written response was pathetic! I wonder who wrote it??”

During the sentencing, McFadden said that Griffin not entering the Capitol “puts the case on a lower misdemeanor level,” but said there is a “grave tension” between his comments in the courtroom and his tweets.”

“Sometimes you are your own worst enemy here,” said McFadden.

McFadden also said he should uphold his oath to the Constitution, noting his responsibility as an elected official. “You are encouraging the breaking of our laws. I have to take that seriously,” McFadden said.

Griffin maintains his mistaken belief that the 2020 election was fraudulent, but McFadden said he was not being sentenced for his voting fraud beliefs.

Griffin’s sentencing in Washington, D.C., took place on the same day as New Mexico’s deadline to certify its election results, and currently, Otero County is refusing to certify, citing unspecified concerns about Dominion voting machines used in the June 7 primary.

The commissioners have not identified any problems with the voting machines, but allies of former President Trump made disproven conspiracy-laden accusations against the reliability of the machines after the 2020 election.

The Democratic secretary of state and the state Supreme Court have ordered Otero County’s commission to certify its results, and there is an emergency meeting of the commission on Friday evening, although it is not clear whether Griffin, who told CNN he would vote against certifying, will be back in New Mexico for the meeting.

Griffin, who arrived in court wearing his signature cowboy hat, took the stand saying, “I am sorry for the violence that day” and that he “disagreed” with it.

“My actions on January 6 was a result of my faith,” said Griffin, who has earlier said he went to pray over the crowd. “I live a life devoted to the Lord.”

Griffin said after the sentencing he believes he is honoring his oath of office by advocating for the hand counting of votes counted by Dominion machines.

“It could be a baseless claim, but you can’t prove anything is baseless until you look deeper into it,” he said Friday afternoon.

Griffin was not accused of any act of physical violence or entering the Capitol building on Jan. 6, 2021, but of being present on restricted Capitol grounds cordoned of by law enforcement and closed to the public ahead of the election certification. He asked the judge to sentence him to no more than two months’ probation, which his lawyer argued was the averse term for such an offense.

“To the extent his presence there contributed to the distress of outnumbered law enforcement officer, he offers them his sincere apology,” the defense wrote in a rehearing filing, later adding, “No evidence, in any case, indicated that Griffin’s purpose in being in the area was driven by [Pence’s] presence specifically” at the Capitol.

“Though he is of limited means, Griffin would seize an opportunity to offer assistance to injured officers and to contribute to the repair of physical damage to the Capitol. Griffin vows to never again enter a restricted area, at the Capitol or anywhere else,” the filing said.

Prosecutors, however, argued Griffin was part of the mob that “succeeded in halting the Congressional certification,” accord to a recent court filing.

“Griffin remained on the Capitol grounds for over two hours while rioters engaged in acts of violence and property damage on the Capitol grounds,” the memo read.

Prosecutors also allege he has used his legal fight as a way to raise monty, asking for contributions to an online funding page.

Jail time, the government argued, was the only way to deter Griffin from acting in such a way again, a claim is legal team countered, saying, “the same Griffin has experienced is itself a guarantee of deterrence.”

He was arrested in the weeks following the attack and held in pretrial detention before his legal team successfully one his court-ordered release. Griffin claimed he was innocent and argued he was unaware that Pence was still anywhere in the Capitol area. He did not testify in his own defense.

June 17, 2022: Reuters reported: “Cowboys for Trump founder sentenced to 14 days for breaching Capitol grounds” It was written by Sarah N. Lynch.

A Republican member of a governing commission in New Mexico who founded a group called “Cowboys for Trump” was sentenced on Friday to 14 days in jail over his role in breaching the U.S. Capitol grounds during the Jan. 6, 2021 riot.

But the man, Couy Griffin, will get credit for the 20 days he already served in pretrial detention, and will not be required to report to prison, the judge said. He was also ordered to pay a $3,000 fine and serve 60 days of community service.

Griffin is one of three members of the Republican-led Otero County commission that is refusing to certify June’s primary election results, citing unfounded conspiracy theories about voting machines.

Griffin was convicted in a bench trial in March of a misdemeanor count of entering and remaining on restricted grounds on Jan. 6, 2021.

Unlike many of the more than 840 defendants in the Capitol riot cases, Griffin did not physically enter the building itself.

He was acquitted of a second misdemeanor of disorderly conduct.

At his sentencing hearing in Washington on Friday, Griffin told U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden that his Christian faith prompted him to enter the Capitol grounds that day, and he swore he “could be struck dead right now,” when he said he truly did not know he was on restricted grounds.

“My actions on Jan. 6 were the result of my faith,” he said. “I received that message to go pray with people.”

Prosecutors in the case had sought a sentence of 90 days in jail, with credit for 20 days served.

They cited Twitter posts Griffin wrote, including one in which he blasted McFadden’s ruling to convict him in the case, calling it “prewritten” and “pathetic” “I wonder who wrote it?” the tweet asked.

“All of that goes to show he does not have any remorse whatsoever,” prosecutor Janani Iyengar said.

Although McFadden did not impose additional jail time, he nevertheless had harsh words for Griffin and called the Capitol riots “a national embarrassment.”

He told Griffin it was “preposterous” to claim he did not know he was violating the law, and blasted his inflammatory Twitter posts, which he said contradicted Griffin’s claims of contrition.

“Sometimes, sir, you are probably your own worst enemy.”

He also chastised Griffin, saying that as an elected official he swore to uphold the law. “I urge you to consider the oath you’ve taken,” he said.

Griffin’s sentencing comes just two days after the New Mexico Supreme Court ordered Otero County’s Republican-led commission to certify June’s primary election results.

The commission is also facing a criminal referral by Democratic-led secretary of state’s office to the state attorney general. The referrals asks the state to open an investigation into “multiple unlawful actions… that directly implicate criminal violations of the Election Code and the Government Conduct Act.”

During his sentencing hearing, Griffin continued to insist there was fraud in the election telling McFadden an audit had uncovered “major discrepancies.” He described himself as a “victim” of political backlash who had been labeled as “crazy and right-wing and white supremacist.”

Later, in comments outside the courthouse to reporters, he said he would decline to comply with the state court’s order to change his vote and certify the June 7 primary results.

“All we want to do is hand-count the ballots that are right. now resting inside the Dominion machine,” he said.

September 6, 2022: CNN reported: “New Mexico county commissioner and Cowboys for Trump founder removed from elected office for role in US Capitol riot”. It was written by Hannah Rabinowitz, Holmes Lybrand, and Scott Brownstein.

A New Mexico judge on Tuesday removed January 6 rioter and Cowboys for Trump founder Couy Griffin from his elected position as a county commissioner for his role in the US Capitol attack.

The ruling was the result of a lawsuit seeking Griffin’s remove, which alleged that he violated a clause in 14th Amendment of the Constitution by participating in an “insurrection” against the US government. He had been convicted of trespassing earlier this year.

The historic ruling represents the first time an elected official has been removed from office for their participation or support of the US. Capitol riot. It also marks the first time a judge has formally ruled that the events of January 6, 2021, were an “insurrection.”

The disqualification comes after unsuccessful challenges by liberal-leaning groups against prominent Trump supporters in the US House of Representatives and Trump-backed candidates of state offices across the country.

Griffin, one of three commissioners in Otero County, is also barred from holding any state or federal elected position in the future, state Judge Francis Mathew ruled Tuesday.

“The irony of Mr. Griffin’s argument that this court should refrain from applying the law this Court should refrain from applying the law and consider the will of he people in District Two of Otero County who retained him as a county commissioner against a recall effort as he attempts to defend his participation in an insurrection by a mob whose goal, by his own admission, was to set aside the result of a free, fair and lawful election by a majority of the people of the entire country (the will of the people) has not escaped this Court,” Mathew wrote.

Griffin, an ardent conspiracy theorist who refused to verify the state’s primary election results this summer in Otero County, told CNN he has been ordered to clean out his office and attacked the judge for being “tyrannical.”

“I’m shocked. Just shocked,” Griffin said. “I really did not feel like the state was going to move on me in such a way. I don’t know where I go from here.”

In his ruling Tuesday, Mathew wrote that Griffin’s attempts “to sanitize his actions are without merit” and “amounted to nothing more than attempting to put lipstick on a pig.”

Griffin and his organization Cowboys for Trump spent “months normalizing the violence that may be necessary to keep President Trump in office,” and urging supporters to travel to Washington, DC, on January 6, Mathew wrote, including multiple inflammatory public speech in which he likened the Stop the Steal movement to a “war” to keep Trump in office.

In June, a DC federal judge sentenced Griffin to 14 days behind bars with time served and one year of supervised release after he was found guilty of trespassing on Capitol grounds during the riot.

February 13, 2024: NBC News reported: ‘Cowboys for Trump’ founder is hoping a Supreme Court ruling on ballot eligibility could help him, too” It was written by Lawrence Hurley.

Couy Griffin is a fervent supporter of Donald Trump, but he has an addition reason for hoping the Supreme Court rule that the former president can stay on eh ballot in Colorado — the decision could benefit him as well.

Griffin, a founder of “Cowboys for Trump,” was criminally convicted for his participation in the events of Jan. 6 that led to an attack on the U.S. Capitol and was later kicked out of office as a county commissioner in New Mexico as a result.

He has his own appeal pending at the Supreme Court that raises questions similar to Trump’s appeal argued last week.

Griffin was removed from his elected position based on the same theory that Colorado officials cite to prevent Trump from appearing on the ballot: a section of the 14th amendment that says those who “engaged in insurrection” cannot hold office.

Based on oral arguments last week, it appears likely the Supreme Court will rule for Trump in his case. The Supreme Court’s reasoning could then apply in Griffin’s case.

Griffin said in an interview he listened to some of the argument and was heartened by the justices’ questions.

“President Trump is at the very top and I am at the very bottom, but a lot of the things they are trying to go after Trump on they have already been after me on,” he said. “I have been kind of a testing ground for the legal stuff.”

The justices are scheduled to discuss Griffin’s case in private for the first time at their regular private conference on Friday.

A state judge removed Griffin from his position as a commissioner in Otero County, New Mexico, in September 2022 after concluding that his actions on Jan. 6 made him ineligible to serve.

Earlier that year, Griffin was convicted of illegally entering the Capitol grounds, although he was acquitted of engaging in disorderly conduct during chaotic scenes in which Trump supporter attempted to prevent Congress from certifying President Joe Biden’s election win.

Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, enacted in the wake of the Civil War, prevents anyone who previously took an oath to defend the Constitution from holding various government offices. It was passed to prevent former Confederates from returning to government but has rarely been enforced.

In Trump’s case, questions asked by the justices indicated the court could rule that only Congress could enforce Section 3 against a presidential candidate.

Donald Sherman, a lawyer at Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a left-leaning watchdog group that represents plaintiffs in both the Trump and Griffin cases, said Griffin would lose out even if the Supreme Court rules in Trump’s favor.

That is in part because of technical legal issues about how Griffin’s case was litigated, but also because the Trump ruling could just focus on federal offices and not state ones, he said.

In the Trump oral argument, justices “raised questions about states enforcing Section 3 against those seeking national office, but expressed no concern about state enforcement against state officials,” Sherman wrote in an email.

Griffin’s lawyer, Peter Ticktin, said the New Mexico court ruling made no distinction between federal and state offices, meaning Griffin can’t hold any government position.

“He can’t even run for dog-catcher,” he said.

Vikram Amar, a professor at the University of California, Davis School of Law who filed a brief in the Trump case saying that Section 3 does not have to be enforced by Congress, and the ruling could distinguish between the presidency and other offices but that such a distinction would be “fabricated by the court.”

If the court rejects the argument that Section 3 is self-executing, “I suppose you can make up whatever you want,” he added, which means Griffin loses out.

Griffin, who at one point planned to ride a horse to this trial in Washington before abandoning the idea, said the entire process to remove him from office was unfair.

“It’s amazing. We live in a country where the headline is ‘democracy is under attack,” and they use a civil bench trial to remove an elected official,” he said.

Griffin, however, is no eyeing a return to elected office even if he were to win the case. He is hoping Trump wins the presidential election and appoints him to a position in the federal government.

The one potential problem with that plan: Section 3 applies to appointed positions, too.

March 19, 2024: CNN Politics reported: “Supreme Court won’t review ruling that removed New Mexico official from office over January 6, insurrection” It was written by John Fritze and Marshall Cohen.

The Supreme Court declined Monday to hear the appeal of a former New Mexico county commissioner who was removed from office because of his role in the January 6, 2021 insurrection — a case that was similar to the one the high court recently decided involved former President Donald Trump.

Cowboys for Trump founder and convicted Capitol rioter Couy Griffin was removed from office in 2022, marking the first time an elected official was booted from office under the 14th Amendment’s “insurrectionist ban” because of the US Capitol riot.

The Supreme Court’s move means the ruling barring Griffin from office will stand.

In a unanimous decision on March 4, the high court sided with Trump in a similar case. Six Colorado voters attempted to knock the former president off the ballot in that state because his remarks before the attack on the US Capitol in 2021. But the court ruled that states couldn’t do so on their own.

Responsibility for enforcing the ban, the court wrote, “rests with Congress and not the states.” But the ruling explicitly said states are allowed to enforce the so-called insurrectionist ban against “persons holding or attempting to hold state office.”

That’s the process that was followed with Griffin, who was removed by his local county office by a New Mexico state judge.

And further, Griffin, unlike Trump, had already been found guilty of a January 6-related crime when he was disqualified from holding office. He was convicted of trespassing on Capitol grounds after a bench trial in March 2022. He was acquitted of a second misdemeanor charge of disorderly conduct, but the conviction bolstered the challengers’ arguments that he engaged in an insurrection.

A civil trial on the disqualification question was held later that year. A state judge ruled that January 6 was an insurrection and the Griffin violated the oath he took as a commissioner by engaging in that insurrection. Griffin was disqualified under Section 3 and was removed in September 2022.

New Mexico’s top court dismissed Griffin’s appeal on procedural grounds.

A prominent right-wing conspiracy theorist, Griffin was part of the Capitol insurrection mob, though he didn’t enter the building itself.

He returned to national attention in June 2022 by refusing to certify the legitimate results of a primary elections in his county, citing baseless claims of election irregularities, which triggered a standoff with state election officials.

In a recent interview with CNN, Griffin slammed the process the led to his disqualification, and also criticized the similar cases against Trump.

“This whole thing starts on a small scale, with them coming after me, with the specific goal of bringing it up to the big stage with Donald Trump,” Griffin said. “I was the test case.

October 22, 2024: Law & Crime reported: ‘Breaching the restricted area suffices,”: Court shuts down ‘Cowboys for Trump’ founder’s Jan. 6 conviction appeal, rejects argument he didn’t know Pence was there”. It was written by Colin Kalmbacher.

A federal court of appeals on Tuesday denied a prominent Jan. 6 defendant’s effort to overturn his misdemeanor trespass conviction.

In March 2022, Couy Griffin, the founder of “Cowboys for Trump” and a former New Mexico county commissioner, was convicted on one count of entering a restricted area on the Capitol grounds and acquitted on one count of disorderly and disruptive conduct in a restricted building. The bench trial was overseen by Donald Trump’s appointed U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden.

On the day of the riot, Griffin made his way into a restricted area that had been cordoned off and closed to the public in order to protect then-Vice President Mike Pence as he waited to oversee vote tallies.

In determining the defendant’s guilt, the lower court judge said Griffin “certainly knew he shouldn’t be there” and “yet, he remained.”

On appeal, the defendant argued his actions did not satisfy the part of the statute that criminalizes trespassing in non-public places.

Griffin said his actions should be reasonably viewed as innocent because the Capitol grounds are typically open to the public, and earlier rioters had dispensed with various law enforcement barriers and signage indicating the area had been restricted.

That argument did not go over well with the majority.

“Under his reading, a defendant would be entitled to acquittal so long as he waited until a sufficiently strong gust of wind, a soaking downpour — or even a less scrupulous prior intruder — disposed of law enforcement tape, fencing, or signage before he entered a sensitive area in full awareness he was not lawfully authorized to do so,” the opinion reads. “We decline to read the statute to allow a mob to de-restrict an officially restricted area encompassing persons under Secret Service protection.”

The court explains its reasoning at length:

U.S. Capitol grounds qualified on January 6 as a “restricted building or grounds” and were “posted, cordoned off, or otherwise restricted” when Griffin entered and remained there. In anticipation of then-Vice President Pence’s presence at the Capitol to certify the electoral votes on January 6, law enforcement officers had erected barriers around the perimeter of the closed area with layers of snow fencing and bike racks supplementing pre-existing permanent walls to encircle the Capitol grounds.

Signs indicating the area was closed were affixed along the barriers. By the time Griffin entered the restricted area, many of those physical manifestations of its closure had been largely trampled, but that fact did not alter the status of the area as closed to the public.

The defendant also argued that lacked the requisite mental state required to commit the crime because he did not know he was trespassing. A related defense argument on the mental state issue was that the court failed to require the government to prove Griffin knew why trespassing in that particular instance would be a crime.

In what might pass for a rehash of the discussion about what Griffin actually did, the court goes through a lengthy recitation about what the government actually proved during the bench trial.

Again, the majority at length:

The government proved that Griffin saw the rings of fencing and signage encircling the Capitol grounds on January 5, and when he recorded a video with the grounds as his backdrop. And it showed that he recorded a video with the grounds as his backdrop.

And it showed that, the next day, when Griffin scaled the stone wall that partially delineated the grounds, he landed on trampled snow fencing and signs, which the district court observed would suggest to a reasonable person “that perhaps you should not be entering the area.”

The evidence that Griffin knew he was trespassing only mounted as he continued to progress across the grounds. Arriving at the base of the inaugural stage, he announced, “we’re in now,” and joked that he should hide his identity with a face mask. When Griffin quipped that he loved the “smell of napalm in the air,” he showed he knew that law enforcement officers were using teargas as they battled to expel a mob — a clear sign that the area remained restricted.

As for the argument that prosecutors never proved he knew why the ground were restricted, the court concluded: “The government was not requires to prove that Griffen was aware that the Vice President’s presence was the reason the ground remained restricted.”

Public policy reasons undergird the appellate court’s interpretation of the relevant statute at issue in the case.

“We hold that knowingly breaching the restricted area suffices, even without knowing the basis of the restriction — here, the presence of Vice President Pence at the Capitol on January 6,” the opinion by Circuit Judge Nina Pillard reads. “Congress intended to criminalize trespasses endangering Secret Service protectees regardless of the trespasser’s awareness of the basis for Congress’s authority to regulate them. And a contrary interpretation would impair the Secret Service’s ability to protect its charges.”

In a ruling against Griffin, however, the court did not just reject the defense’s argument. They also rejected a mens era – mental state– requirement alltogether.

The majority said applying such a requirement “would pointlessly hinder the Secret Service’s ability to defend national leaders from would-be assassins and encumber the prosecution of persons whose knowing trespasses endanger persons under Secret Service protection.”

In dissent, Circuit Judge Gregory Katsas said the rationale advanced by the majority was actually an argument in favor of retaining a highly specific mental state requirement.

October 22, 2024: CNN Politics reported: “January 6 riot condition of ‘Cowboys for Trump” founder is upheld in precedent-setting case” It as written by Katelyn Polantz.

The federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday upheld the conviction of the Cowboys for Trump fonder who entered the restricted area of the US Capitol on January 6, 2021, saying rioters didn’t have to know the Secret Service was protecting then-Vice President Mike Pence inside when they breached the area.

The case is among a handful that tested the foundational approach the Justice Department took to prosecute hundreds of Capitol rioters, and the decision has been long-awaited since it was argued last December by those handling cases coming through the DC federal court.

It also strengthens federal protection the Secret Service can offer, by defining more clearly the law around trespassing in areas where public officials are being protected.

“The basis of the Secret Service’s authority to prevent access to designated areas for the safety of its protectees … need not be in the mind of the trespasser,” DC Circuit Judge Nina Pillard wrote in the opinion Tuesday.

The unsuccessful challenge to the law was brought by Couy Griffin, a New Mexico local official who organized a group called Cowboys for Trump, who jumped a stone wall outside the Capitol to board the inauguration stage. Griffin was convicted of two misdemeanors, including the trespassing change, and was sentenced to 14 days in jail and a year of supervised release.

“In [Griffin’s] view, the statute also requires proof that he knew why the Capitol grounds were so restricted when he entered or remained there — i.e. that a Secret Service protectee was or would be temporarily visiting the Capitol grounds. We decline to adopt such a rule,” Pillard wrote in a 2-1 opinion. “Griffin’s approach would surely hinder the Secret Service’s capacity to handle the full range of potential threats.”

It’s possible Griffin continues to fight his trespass charge with further appeals, including potentially to the US Supreme Court, which has shown interest in reinterpreting the law around the Capitol riot.

Griffin previously asked the Supreme Court to hear a different legal challenge he brought related to January 6, following his removal from an elected public office. A judge jettisoned Griffin from his role as a New Mexico county commissioner, and the high court declined to hear his case seeking reinstatement.

An attorney for Griffin from the federal public defender service didn’t immediately respond to CNN’s request for comment.

Trump appointee dissents

The three-judge panel had one dissenter, Judge Greg Katsas, a Trump appointee. Judge Judith Rogers, a Clinton appointee, sided with Pillard, an Obama appointee, in the majority opinion.

In his dissent Katsas said he believed prosecutors should have had to prove Griffin knew the seriousness of the protected area where he was trespassing and that Pence could be there, in addition to proving that he knew he was crossing into a prohibited area.

“Needless to say, a trespass that threatens the life or safety of the President or Vice President is substantially more culpable than a simple trespass consisting of nothing more than knowingly entering an area ‘posted, cordoned off, or otherwise restricted,” Katas wrote.

“Trespassers unaware that someone like the President or Vice President is present are much less likely to pose a threat to those officials than are individual who knowingly trespass into an area restricted to protect them,” the judge added.

Katas noted among the 470 trespassing convictions of January 6 rioters that prosecutors have secured, trial court judges in DC split on how much those rioters had to know of Pence’s presence at the Capitol.

September 6, 2022: NBC News reported: “Cowboys for Trump co-founder barred from public office over Jan. 6” It was written by Summer Concepcion.

A New Mexico judge ordered the co-founder of Cowboys for Trump removed from public office Tuesday over his presence at the U.S. Capitol during the Jan. 6 riot.

State District Judge Francis Mathew removed Otereo County Commissioner Cuoy Griffin from his elected position “effective immediately” and banned him from seeking further public office, citing the 14th Amendment’s clause barring those who have take oaths to uphold the Constitution from holding federal or state office if they have engaged “in insurrection or rebellion.”

“Due to his disqualification under Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment, defendant is constitutionally ineligible and barred for life from serving as a ‘Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President’, or from “hold[ing] any office, civil or military, under the United States, or any State,’ including his current office as an Otero County Commissioner,” Matthew wrote.

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington and several New Mexico-based law firms represented a group of state residents in the lawsuit to remove Griffin as county commissioner.

Griffin, who has espoused false claims of mass voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election, was convicted in federal court this year of a misdemeanor for entering the Capitol grounds on Jan. 6, 2021, without going inside. Griffin was sentenced to 14 days and given credit for time served.

Griffin was the second defendant to go to trial in connection with the Capitol attack after his arrest in January 2021, weeks after supporters of then-President Donald Trump stormed the Capitol to protest the results of the 2020 election amid Trump’s refusal to concede.

Griffin, who faced misdemeanor charges, represented himself in a two-day bench trial. He made headlines at the start of the trial this year for ditching his plans to ride a horse to the courthouse. Griffin claimed that he abandoned the plan because h wanted to respect the court and didn’t want to create a “spectacle.” He instead showed up with a truck with “COWBOYS FOR TRUMP” -branded horse trailer attached.

Upon walking into the courthouse in March, Griffin insisted that the metal police barricade he climbed upon on the grounds of the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, was actually a step.

“That was a step,” Griffin claimed. “It was a meta step. I used it as a step … You can call it a barricade. I call it a step.”

October 22, 2024: KSBY Action News 8 reported: “Jan. 6 riot conviction of “Cowboys for Trump” founder upheld in president-setting case.” It was written by Katelyn Polantz.

The federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday upheld the conviction of the Cowboys for Trump founder who entered the restricted area of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, saying rioters didn’t have to know the Secret Service was protecting then-Vice President Mike Pence inside when they breached the area.

The case is among a handful that tested the foundational approach the Justice Department took to prosecute hundreds of Capitol rioters, and the decision has been long-awaited since it was argued last December by those handling cases coming through the D.C. federal court.

It also strengthens federal protection the Secret Service can offer, by defining more clearly the law around trespassing in areas where public officials are being protected.

“The basis of the Secret Service’s authority to prevent access to designated areas for the safety of its protectees … need not be in the mind of a trespasser,” DC Circuit Judge Nina Pillard wrote in the opinion Tuesday.

The unsuccessful challenge to the law was brought by Couy Griffin, a New Mexico local official who organized a group called Cowboys for Trump, who jumped a stone wall outside the Capitol to board the inauguration state. Griffin was convicted of two misdemeanors, including the trespassing charge, and was sentenced to 14 days in jail and a year of supervised release.

“In [Griffin’s] view, the statute also requires proof that he knew why the Capitol grounds were so restricted when he entered or remained there — i.e., that a Secret Service protect was or would be temporarily visiting the Capitol grounds. We decline to adopt such a rule,” Pillard wrote in the 2-1 opinion. “Griffin’s approach would surely hinder the Secret Service’s capacity to handle the full range of potential threats.”

It’s possible Griffin will continue to fight his trespass charge with further appeals, including potentially to the U.S. Supreme Court, which has shown interest in reinterpreting the law around the Capitol riot.

Griffin previously asked the Supreme Court to hear a different legal challenge he brought to Jan. 6, following his removal from an elected public office. A judge jettisoned Griffin from his role as a New Mexico county commissioner, and the high court declined to hear his case seeking reinstatement.

An attorney for Griffin from the federal public defender’s service didn’t immediately respond to CNN’s request for comment.

Trump appointee dissents

The three-judge panel had one deserter, Judge Greg Katsas, a Trump appointee. Judge Judith Rogers, a Clinton appointee, sided with Pillard, an Obama appointee, in the majority opinion.

In his dissent, Katsas said he believed prosecutors should have to prove Griffin knew the seriousness of the protected area where he was trespassing and that Pence could be there, in addition to proving that he knew he was crossing a prohibited area.

“Needless to say, a trespass threatened the life or safety of the President or Vice President is substantially more culpable than a simple trespass considering of nothing more than knowing entering an area ‘posted, cordoned off, or otherwise restricted,” Katsas wrote.

“Trespassers unaware that someone like the President or Vice President is present are much less likely to post a threat to those officials than are individual who knowingly trespass into an area restricted to protect them,” the judge added.

Katsas noted that among the 470 trespassing conviction of January 6 rioters that prosecutors have secured, trial court judges in D.C. split on how much those rioters had to know of Pence’s presence at the Capitol.


Trump Lawsuits 0 comments on Insurrectionists Are Facing Consequences – Part 7

Insurrectionists Are Facing Consequences – Part 7

photo of U.S. Capitol by Caleb Fisher on Unsplash

Those who attacked their own nation’s Capitol failed to consider the consequences of doing so. This is part 6.

On January 6, 2021, a mob of Donald Trump supporters staged an insurrection at the U.S. Capitol building. The Guardian reported that people stormed the chambers of the House and Senate while the Electoral College does were being tallied.


California man testified against Capitol riot companion sentenced to home detention

May 3, 2024: The Associated Press reported: “California man who testified against Capitol riot companion is sentenced to home detention” It was written by Michael Kunzleman.

A California man who organized a “group of fighters” to storm the U.S. Capitol — and later, testified against one of his companions during the Jan. 6, 2021 attack — was sentenced on Friday to six months of home detention.

Russell Taylor had a knife on his chest and was carrying a hatchet in his backpack when he helped the rioters overrun a police line outside the Capitol.

Taylor, 42, of Ladera Ranch, California, pleaded guilty last year to conspiring to obstruct the Jan. 6 joint session of Congress for certifying President Joe Biden’s 2020 electoral victory. He was a key witness for prosecutors in the trial of Alan Hostetter, a former police chief who was also convicted of a conspiracy charge.

Prosecutors recommended a prison term of four years and four months for Taylor, but U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth spared him from incarceration and sentenced him to three years of probation. He also ordered him to preform 100 hours of community service.

Lamberth, who has been one of the toughest punishers of the Jan. 6 riot defendants, said a probation sentence “comes once in a lifetime in my courtroom” and warned Taylor that he will be imprisoned if he violates his probation terms.

“You can be the poster child now for how these cases should be done,” the judge said.

“There’s hope at the end of the tunnel,” the judge said.

Taylor fought back tears as he recalled spending time jailed in solitary confinement after his arrest.

“I thought about why I was there and the mistake I made on January 6th,” he said. “I thought about being charged with a crime by a country that I do love.”

Prosecutors cited Taylor’s cooperation as grounds for leniency but argued that his role in the Jan. 6 attack merited a prison sentence.

“Taylor understood that his decision would not only sever his relationship with former associate but expose him to potential harassment and threats as well,” prosecutor wrote in a court filing.

Taylor and Hostetter served together on the board of the American Phoenix Project. Hostetter founded the group to protest government restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic, but its focus later shifted to conspiracy theories about election fraud.

“After then-President (Donald) Trump lost the 2020 election, Taylor and Hostetter discussed how to respond, and Taylor asked, ‘How do we have a show of force? Motorcade? Rally? Riot?” prosecutors wrote.

Before the riot, Taylor organized a Telegram group that he called: “The California Patriots — DC Brigade” for those “that are traveling to DC for Jan 6th event that are comfortable with violence.” Taylor told members they would use the Telegram channel “to organize a group of fighters.

Taylor flew to Washington while Hostetter drove across the country with weapons that Taylor would carry when he stormed the Capitol.

A day before Trump’s “Stop the Steal” rally near the White House on Jan. 6, Taylor and Hostetter gave speeches with violent rhetoric at a rally outside the U.S. Supreme Court.

“I will see you all tomorrow at the front lines. We are taking our country back!” Hostetter told the crowd.

After attending the rally, Hostetter and Taylor marched to the Capitol and approached a police line on the Lower West Terrace. Taylor cheered on the rioters who broke through the police line, shouting, “Move forward, Americans!”

Taylor then pushed against a police line on a stage set up for Biden’s inauguration. An officer deployed pepper spray in Taylor’s face, briefly causing him to retreat.

Hostetter and Taylor didn’t enter the Capitol but remained on the Upper West Terrace for hours before police cleared the area. Taylor later celebrated on Telegram, posting “I was pushing through traitors all day today. WE STORMED THE CAPITAL!” Freedom was fully demonstrated today!

Taylor was charged with Hostetter and four other defendants — Erik Scott Warner, Felipe Antonio Martinez, Derek Kinnison and Ronald Mele — who authorities have linked to the anti-government Three Percenters militia movement.

Lamberth sentenced Hostetter to over 11 years in prison after convicting him on all four counts, including conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding and entering a restricted area with deadly or dangerous weapon. After a jury separately convicted the four other defendants, Lamberth sentenced them to terms of imprisonment ranging from 21 to 33 months.

Taylor said he thought he was “answering the call of a president that I believed in.”

“I was wrong to follow and listen to many people like Alan, who had their own agendas,” he told the judge.

Defense attorney Dyke Huish said Taylor already has performed 300 hours of community service and took citizenship classes “to remind him of the true value of being an American.”

Taylor’s cooperation with the government created an “unusual conundrum,” his lawyer said.

“This who still support the events of January 6th see him in hostile terms for his admissions and cooperation. He has been treated harshly by some people and had veiled personal threats. At the same time those on the other side of the issue shun him because he went to Washington D.C. in the first place,” Huish wrote.

More than 1,350 people have been charged with federal crimes related to the Capitol riot. Over 850 of them have been sentenced, with roughly two-thirds receiving a term of imprisonment ranging from a few days to 22 years.

December 11, 2024: CBS News reported: “Man who pleaded guilty to Jan. 6 charge asks court if he can go to Trump’s inauguration” It was written by Scott MacFarlane.

A California man who pleaded guilty last year to conspiring to obstruct the Jan. 6, 2021, joint session of Congress to certify President Biden’s 2020 victory has asked the court for permission to travel to Washington, D.C., to attend President-elect Donald Trump’s inauguration on Jan. 20.

Russell Taylor, who was part of a group affiliated with the far-right, anti-government Three Percenters that was accused of plotting and planning to disrupt the electoral count, asked U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth if he can travel with his wife and children to Washington D.C., and Maryland for the inauguration.

Taylor’s lawyer, Dyke Huish, said in a court filing that Taylor was invited to attend the ceremony by retired Rep. Chris Stewart, of Utah. Huish stated that Taylor had completed his home confinement and was in compliance with his probation. He wrote that Taylor “does not pose any risk or concern for this travel request.”

Taylor admitted he had helped organize an effort on Telegram to travel to Washington on Jan. 6, to be “ready and willing to fight.”

A day before Jan. 6, 2021, he addressed a crowd saying, “I will see all tomorrow at the front lines. We are taking our country back!”

On Jan. 6, Taylor wore an armored tactical vest and brought a stun baton with him to the Capitol and was among the initial groups of rioters trying to break through police lines. He recorded a video in which he was seen urging rioters to fight and push forward against police. Later that day, he posted on Telegram, “I was pushing through traitors all day today. WE STORMED THE CAPITOL! Freedom was fully demonstrated today!”

Taylor, who had no prior convictions, flipped and cooperated with the Justice Department, testifying against a lead organizer, Alan Hostetter, a former police chief who was convicted of a conspiracy charge.

Prosecutors recommended a prison term of almost 4.5 years for Taylor, but Lamberth instead sentenced him to three years of probation and 100 hours of community service. Lambert said he believed Taylor had testified truthfully and expressed sincere remorse, and he said Taylor’s cooperation had been “essential,” which earned him the chance to avoid prison time.

Taylor told the judge, “I thought about why I was there and the mistake I made on January 6th. I thought about being charged with a crime by a country that I do love.”

December 11, 2024: “January 6 defendant invite to Trump’s inauguration by former GOP lawmaker” It was written by Ryan J. Reilly and Megan Lebowitz.

A Republican former House member and three current members of Congress from Utah invited a Jan. 6 defendant to President-elect Donald Trump’s inauguration, according to a letter filed by the defendant’s lawyer.

Jan. 6 defendant Russell Taylor organized a group of “fighters” to travel to Washington D.C., on Jan. 6, 2021, in response to Trump’s tweet telling supporters the day “will be wild.” Last year, Taylor pleaded guilty to a count of obstruction of an official proceeding and cooperated with the government against members of the Three Percenters militia group. Taylor, prosecutors wrote, went to the Capitol led a mob that overran a police line while he was “wearing an exposed knife on top of a bullet proof chest plate and carrying bear spray, a hatchet, and other weapons in his backpack.”

Taylor’s lawyer, Dyke E. Huish, filed a motion Wednesday asking U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth to allow Russel to travel to Washington with his wife and children for the inauguration.

The filing, which was first reported by Politico, included a letter from former Rep. Chris Stewart, of Utah, who wrote that “three other current members of the Utah congressional delegation join with me in extending this invitation.”

Huish told NBC News that Taylor had friends in common but didn’t meet Stewart himself until after Taylor was sentenced to probation along with six months of home detention.

“Mr. Taylor has some family friends who knew the congressman,” Huish said. “It’s a really boring story: They’re just friends, and he said “Hey, would you like to come to the inauguration?” and he set off a letter, and I’ve got to ask the judge permission, and here we are.”

Huish said he did not know which three of the four members of the Utah delegation had joined Stewart in inviting Taylor to the inauguration.

Stewart, a strong defender of Trump in Congress, resigned last year, citing his wife’s illness.

Stewart wrote in his letter that Taylor is a “caring father and reveres his family, his faith,” and “is admired by many, and especially those in his community.” He wrote that “Russ’ passion for what is right and good is reflected in his intentions to lift others. I am honored to extend this invitation for him to attend the Inauguration as my guest.”

Steward did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Huish said in his filing that Taylor “has successfully completed his home confinement and is in compliance with his terms and conditions of probation.”

Taylor organized a group of “Patriots that are ready to function as operators of disruption and against Tyranny” ahead of the attack, writing, “I personally want to be on the front steps and be one of the first to breach the doors!” The weapons and tactical gear found on him included “hatchets, a taser, stun batons, bear spray, tactical gloves, a helmet, and a plate carrier vest with bullet proof plates,” according to a memorandum for his sentencing.

On Jan. 6, 2021, after the Capitol attack, Taylor wrote in a message that he “was pushing through traitors all day today.”

“WE STORMED THE CAPITOL! Freedom was fully demonstrated today,” he continued.

Taylor’s filing requesting permission to travel comes just days after Lamberth emphasized the judicial principles of “truth and justice, law and order” at a separate Jan. 6 sentencing. Lamberth had also said jurors who heard Jan. 6-related cases “know how perilously we came to letting the peaceful transfer of power, that great cornerstone of the American republican experiment and perhaps our foremost contribution to posterity, slip away from us.”

Taylor testified on behalf of the government in trials that ultimately led to prison sentences for his co-conspirators. Huish said Lamberth had described his client as “the poster child” for the proper way for Jan. 6 defendants to handle their cases.

“He’s never backed off his belief that there were improprieties in the 2020 election. He’s always supported President-elect Trump But at the same time, he said, “Look, I personally went too far,” Huish said. “Quite honestly, if more people had been like Mr. Taylor, I think there’d be a lot less people in jail and we’d have restored this stuff a lot faster. You don’t have to give up your integrity to say, “I went too far.”

Trump has previously lavished praise on Jan. 6 rioters, a refrain he frequently invoked on the campaign trail. He has described people facing prison time for their roles in the Jan. 6 attack as “hostages” and “patriots.”

He has said he would “most likely” pardon Jan. 6 rioters, saying in a “Meet the Press” interview, that aired Sunday that “those people have suffered long and hard.”

In the interview, Trump said members of Congress who served on the House Jan. 6 committee ‘should go to jail.”

More than 1,570 people have been charged for crimes related to the Jan. 6 attack, according to data released this week by the U.S. attorney’s office for Washington. Of that number, about 590 people were charged related to assaulting or resisting law enforcement or obstructing the officers’ jobs, according to the office. Overall, prosecutors have secured convictions against more than 1,100 defendants, and Judge has sentenced more than 600 rioters to incarceration.

July 13, 2023: The Associated Press reported: “Former police chief who defended himself at trial is convicted of conspiracy in Jan. 6 riot” It was written by Michael Kunzelman.

A former California police chief was convicted on Thursday of joining the riot at the U.S. Capitol with a hatchet in his backpack and plotting to stop Congress from certifying President Joe Biden’s 2020 electoral victory.

A judge in Washington’s federal court heard testimony without a jury before convicting Alan Hostetter, a right-wing activist and vocal critic of COVID-19 restrictions who defended himself at his bench trial with help from a standby attorney.

Hostetter used his closing arguments to spin conspiracy theories about the Jan. 6, 2021, riot. He falsely claimed the 2020 election was stolen from former President Donald Trump, portrayed himself as a victim of FBI corruption and referred to the mob’s attack as a “federal setup” involving “crisis actors wearing costumes.” He downplayed violence at the Capitol, referring to the riot as “basically the equivalent of a three-hour hissy fit.”

U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth told Hostetter that no reasonable person — let alone a veteran police officer — would believe that it was legal to use mob violence to obstruct Congress.

“Belief that your actions are for a greater good does not negate consciousness of wrongdoing,” Lamberth said.

Hostetter — who previously served as police chief in La Habra, California, near Los Angels, — was convicted on all four counts, including conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding and entering a restricted area with deadly or dangerous weapon. The judge scheduled sentencing for Oct 13, and denied a Justice Department request to have Hostetter jailed immediately.

Federal prosecutors said Hostetter has no evidence to support his conspiracy theories but stressed that he was charged with crimes for his actions on Jan. 6 — not his political beliefs. One prosecutor, Jason Manning, said Hostetter advocated for violence and mobilize allies to join him in Washington on Jan. 6 because he “didn’t like the election results.”

“For many Americans, the horror of January 6th came out of nowhere. Not for the defendant,” Manning said.

Hostetter was arrested in June 2021 along with five other men. Their indictment linked four of Hostetter’s co-defendants to the Three Percenters wing of the militia movement. Their name refers to the myth that only 3% of Americans fought against the British in the Revolutionary War.

Hostetter said he doesn’t have any connection to the Three Percenters movement and accused prosecutors of falsely portraying him as “a caricature of some radical terrorist.”

One of Hostetter’s co-defendants, Russell Taylor, pleaded guilty in April to a conspiracy charge. Taylor testified for the government at Hostetter’s trial. A trial for the other four is scheduled for October.

The six men — Hostetter, Taylor, Eric Scott Warner, Felipe Antonia Martinez, Derek Kinnison, and Ronald Mele — were part of a chat group called “The California Patriots – DC Brigade” on Telegram, an encrypted messaging platform, prosecutors said. Taylor posted that he created the group for “fighters” who were expected to bring “weaponry” and “plates” with them to Washington on Jan. 6, according to prosecutors.

All six defendants entered restricted areas of the Capitol grounds during the riot, prosecutors said. Hostetter wasn’t accused of entering the Capitol building.

On Instagram Hostetter posted a photo of himself and Taylor on the building’s Upper West Terrace with rioters in the background. A message under the photo said, “This was the ‘shot heard ’round the world!” … the 2021 version of 1776. That war lasted 8 years. We are just getting warmed up.”

Hostetter began teaching yoga after more than 20 years in law enforcement. In the spring of 2020, he founded a nonprofit called the American Phoenix Project. He used the tax-exempt organization to oppose COVID-19 restrictions and to advocate for violence against political opponents after the 2020 presidential election.

In November 2020, Hostetter drove to California to Washington to attend the “Million MAGA March” supporting Trump. On the way, he posted a video of his nonprofit’s YouTube channel in which he expressed his belief that the election had been stolen from Trump and called for killing “tyrants and traitors.”

In December 2020, Hostetter’s nonprofit hosted a “Stop the Steal” rally in Huntington Beach, California.

“The enemies and traitors of American both foreign and domestic must be held accountable. And they will,” he said at the rally. “There must be long prison terms, while execution is the just punishment for the ringleaders of this group.”

A day before the riot, Taylor gave a speech at a “Virginia for Trump” rally outside the U.S. Supreme Court in which he called for violence to overturn the 2020 presidential election results, prosecutors said.

“We are all free Americans and in these streets, we will fight and we will bleed before we allow our freedom to be taken from us,” Taylor said, according to the indictment.

More than 1,000 people have been charged with federal crimes related to the Capitol riot. Approximately 100 of hem have been convicted after trial decided by judges or juries. More than 600 others have pleaded guilty.


Ex-police chief who spread Jan. 6 conspiracy theories sentenced to 11 years

December 7, 2023: NBC News posted: “Ex-police chief who spread Jan. 6 conspiracy theories is sentenced to 11 years in Capitol riot case.” It was written by Ryan J. Reilly.

A former California police chief who called for the execution of Donald Trump’s political enemies, joined the U.S. Capitol attack and then spread conspiracy theories about Jan 6 was sentenced to more than 11 years in federal prison on Thursday.

Alan Hostetter was found guilty in July on charges of conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, obstruction of an official proceeding, entering or remaining on restricted grounds with a deadly or dangerous weapon and disorderly or disruptive conduct on restricted grounds with a deadly or dangerous weapon. He represented himself at a bench trial before U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth, a Ronald Regan appointed, who sentenced him to 135 months Thursday.

Hostetter, who was the chief of the La Habra, California, Police Department in 2010, was arrested in June 2021.

Like GOP presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy and many far-right members of Congress, Hostetter has spread conspiracy theories about the attack on Jan. 6, 2021. Ramaswamy said, without evidence, during the Republican debate Wednesday night that Jan. 6 “now does look like it was an inside job,” Hostetter said during his trial that he believed “that the entire thing was staged.”

Hostetter, who was found to have carried a hatchet during the attack, brought up Ramaswamy’s debate comments at his sentencing hearing Thursday.

“These conspiracy theories are no longer fringe,” he said, noting Ramaswamy’s comments specifically.

“The open election was stolen. You have presidential candidates saying that openly during the debate,” Hostetter said. “At some point, the truth is going to be coming out.”

Hostetter also noted House Speaker Mike Johnson’s decision to release Jan. 6 video, which has sparked additional unsupported conspiracy theories.

Hostetter also founded a group called the American Phoenix Project, which protested covid restrictions and denied the 2020 election results. He recorded a video after Donald Trump lost the election in which he said that “traitors need to be executed” and promoted Jan. 6 as the final day when patriots could make their stand.”

“Choke that city off, fill it with patriots, and then those people behind the walls of the Senate and House are gonna be listening to just chanting outside those walls.” Hostetter said in a speech ahead of the attack that was cited by prosecutors. “And they’re gonna realize, we have one choice. We either fix this mess and keep America America, or we become traitors, and those five million people outside the walls are gonna drag us out by our hair and tie us to a f—ing lamppost. That’s their option.”

“Some people, at the highest level, need to be made an example of: an execution or two or three,” Hostetter said in a video he recorded in November 2020. “Tyrants and traitors need to be excused as an example so nobody pulls this s— again.”

Federal prosecutors had sought more than 12.5 years in federal prison, sayin Hostetter conspired, collected weapons and traveled to Washington with the plan of using the threat of violence to stop the peaceful transfer of power.

At a hearing Thursday, Assistant U.S. Attorney Anthony Mariano said that Hostetter had made himself a “poster child for Jan. 6 conspiracy theories” and that he spent time “promoting the dangerous lie that Jan. 6 was a false flag operation.”

But as Mariano pointed out, Hostetter had “not a piece of evidence” to support the conspiracy theory.

“If the defendant wants to know what would have stopped Jan. 6, he could start by looking in the mirror,” Mariano said, describing Hostetter’s actions as terroristic, not patriotic.

Hostetter said at the hearing that he believed Jan. 6 was a setup by the CIA, the FBI, and the Department of Homeland Security. He said that he believed crisis actors and federal informants were involved, that the attack was a “false flag event” and that the death of Trump supporter Ashli Babbitt was faked.

“Once Ashli Babbitt psy-ops falls, this whole thing becomes undone,” Hostetter said, adding he believed there were “hundreds, if not possibly thousands,” of government informants in the crowd that day.

Hostetter also said he believes Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes — who is serving 18 years in federal prison — is a government asset.

Hostetter will be required to report to prison next year. After the hearing, Babbitt’s mother, Micki Witthoeft, confronted him in the hallway. Witthoeft, who got a meeting with former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy this year and frequently attends Jan. 6 court hearings, told Hostetter that her daughter was, in fact, dead.

“I assure you she is dead,” she said. “What the f— is it you’re trying to say?”

“Was she cremated?” Hostetter asked.

“You need help,” she replied. “Arrogant s—“

Hostetter’s trial featured testimony from co-defendant Russell Taylor, who pleaded guilty as part of a plea deal with the government. Their four co-defendants — Erik Scott Warner, Felipe Antonio Martinez, Derek Kinnison, and Ronald Mele — were all found guilty of felony obstruction of an official proceeding and other charges after trial last month.

More than 1,200 people have been charged in connection with the Capitol attack, and more than 450 have been sentenced to periods of incarceration.

December 7, 2023: NPR reported: “Former police chief turned yoga teacher sentenced to 11 years over Jan. 6 riot” It was written by Tom Dreisbach, and Barbara Van Woerkom.

A retired California police chief, who led pro-Trump protests and called for “traitors” in government to be “executed as an example,” was sentenced to 135 months — just over 11 years — in prison for his role in the Jan. 6 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol.

After representing himself at his trial earlier this year, Alan Hostetter was convicted of conspiring to obstruct Congress’ certification of Joe Biden’s electoral victory, bringing a hatchet onto Capitol grounds, and disorderly conduct. While Hostetter joined the mob on the steps of the Capitol, he stopped short of entering the building and did not assault police officers during the riot.

“This defendant’s conduct was terrorism,” said Assistant U.S. Attorney Anthony Marino, who argued that Hostetter’s lengthy career in law enforcement meant he should have known better.

“Through his words and deeds on Jan. 6, Alan Hostetter was a terrorist,” Marino said. “Nothing he did was patriotic.”

Hostetter denied wrongdoing and gave a lengthy conspiratorial rant claiming that the Capitol riot was the result of a “false flag” attack engineered by the federal government. “I have full faith and confidence the truth will come out and when it does it will shock people,” Hostetter told the court. He also praised Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy for saying at Wednesday’s GOP primary debate that the Jan. 6 riot “now does look like it was an inside job.”

At one point in his remarks to the court, Hostetter endorsed a baseless fringe theory that the fatal shooting of Ashli Babbitt, who was killed by a police officer while attempting to breach a locked door in the Capitol was “staged”.

“She wasn’t actually killed that day,” Hostetter said. That claim angered Babbitt’s mother, Micki Witthoft, who attended the hearing. Witthoeft confronted Hostetter outside the courtroom, calling him “arrogant” and telling him “you need help.”

The Department of Justice had asked Judge Royce Lamberth to sentence Hostetter to just over 12 years in prison, arguing that his violent anti-government rhetoric, carrying of dangerous weapons, and extensive planning merited a harsh punishment.

Many participants in the Jan. 6, 2021, riot took unusual paths to the storming of the Capitol, but few were as singular as Hostetter’s.

Hostetter served in the U.S. Army in the 1980s and deployed to Germany before going on to work for the Orange County Sheriff’s Department and ultimately becoming police chief of La Habra, Calif. After her retired from that position due to what he said were spinal problems, Hostetter settled in the small beachside community of San Clemente and became a yoga instructor and sound healer. He posted videos of himself playing a gong in front of a sunset, and rhapsodizing about the search for inner peace.

After the COVID-19 pandemic hit in early 2020, Hostetter began leading protests against what he viewed as tyrannical government overreach, and spoke in terms of violent anti-government revolution. He founded a nonprofit called the American Phoenix Project to support his protest efforts, and gained traction in Southern California’s right-wing political scene, standing out with his signature trilby hat and goatee. Hostetter appeared at events with Republican politicians and patented with the law firm of a prominent Republican attorney, Harmeet Dhillon, to challenge California’s COVID-19 policies in court.

Throughout his case, Hostetter has appeared to endorse a wide range of baseless conspiracy theories while arguing that he is a target of a longstanding government plot.

At time, he has referenced the pro-Trump QAnon conspiracy alongside claims about the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, the firing of Tucker Carlson from Fox News and the Freemasons.

After the 2020 election, Hostetter and his group turned their focus to rejecting Biden’s electoral victory.

“President Trump must be inaugurated on January 20th, and he must be allowed to finish this historic job of cleaning out the corruption in the cesspool known as Washington, D.C.,” Hosteter said in a speech in Huntington Beach, Calif. in Dec. 2020. “The enemies and traitors of America, both foreign and domestic, must be held accountable. And they will. There must be long prison terms, while execution is the just punishment for the ringleaders of this coup.”

Prosecutors say that Hostetter then, “spent weeks rallying others, collecting weapons and planning an attack on the U.S. Capitol on they that the peaceful transfer of power was meant to take place.”

Key evidence against Hostetter came from one of his co-defendants, a California man named Russell Taylor. He helped plan protests with Hostetter and joined Hostetter in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 6 while armed with a knife, body armor and a stun baton. Taylor pleaded guilty to a charge of conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, cooperated with prosecutors and testified against his former friend.

Hostetter continued to dispute Taylor’s testimony at his sentencing hearing. In wrapping his remarks, he thanked Judge Lamberth for allowing him to speak at length about his case. “You always have given me the opportunity to flap my gums,” Hostetter told the court.

December 7, 2023: United States Attorney’s Office District of Columbia posted: “Texas Man Sentenced To More than 11 Years in Prison for Conspiracy To Obstruct Congress and Other Charges during Jan. 6 Capitol Breach”

Defendant, a Retired Police Chief and Member of the “DC Brigade,” Conspired to Halt Electoral College Vote

A Texas man, formerly of California, was sentenced today in the District of Columbia after he was convicted on four felonies as a result of his conduct during the breach of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. His actions and the actions of others disrupted a joint session of the U.S. Congress convened to ascertain and count the electoral votes related to the 2020 presidential election.

Alan Hostetter, 59, of Poolville, Texas, formerly of San Clemente, California, was sentenced by U.S. District Judge Royce C. Lamberth to 135 months in prison and 36 months of supervised release. Judge Lamberth found Hostetter guilty of four felonies on July 13, 2023, following a bench trial.

Hostetter was convicted of conspiring to obstruct an official proceeding; obstruction of an official proceeding and aiding and abetting; entering and remaining in a restricted building or grounds with a deadly or dangerous weapon; and disorderly or disruptive conduct in the restricted building or grounds with a deadly or dangerous weapon.

According to the evidence presented at trial, in the days following the 2020 presidential election, Hostetter, a retired police chief, coordinated with his co-conspirators to obstruct and interfere with the joint session of Congress at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, convened in order to certify the electoral college vote.

Prior to the events of January 6th, Hostetter gave several speeches espousing his views on the 2020 presidential election and calling for the execution of his perceived political enemies. He pronounced to a crowd of supporters, “There must — absolutely must — be a reckoning. There must be justice. President Trump must be inaugurated on January 20th, and he must be allowed to finish his historic job of cleaning out the corruption in the cesspool known as Washington, D.C. The enemies and traitors of America, both foreign and domestic, but be held accountable. And they will. There must be long prison terms, while execution is the just punishment for the ringleaders of this coup.”

In another such speech in December 2020, Hostetter told a crowd of supporters that what he intended to accomplish on Jan. 6, 2021, when Congress was in session, stating, “Choke that city off, fill it with patriots, and then those people behind the walls of the Senate and House are going to be listening to us chanting outside those walls.” He added that he wanted member of Congress to know that “those five million people outside the walls are going to drag us out by our hair and tie us to a f— lamp post.”

On Jan. 1, 2021, a co-conspirator of Hostetter’s created a Telegram chat called “The California Patriots-DC Brigade,” which Hostetter, along with more than 30 others, joined and used to identify themselves, communicate and coordinate with each other.

Hostetter drove to Washington D.C., for the January 6th protest, choosing not to fly so that he could load his car with weapons. Hostetter brought tactical gear, a helmet, hatchets, knives, stun batons, pepper spray, and other gear for himself and others. On the morning of Jan. 6th. Hostetter met up with other members of the “DC Brigade” and walked to the Ellipse for the “Stop the Steal” rally.

Following the conclusion of the events at the Ellipse, Hostetter and others began to walk toward the Capitol building, where he made his way up the stairs of the Capitol, through scaffolding and onto the Inaugural state. As he came out from the scaffolding, Hostetter carried a bullhorn and looked down over the West Plaza, where rioters were battling with the police line they had passed earlier.

From his highly visible perch, and which his bullhorn directed to the crowd and his American flag waving above the chaotic scene, Hostetter encouraged the rioters below, who had been overrun by the police. At approximately 2:30 p.m., Hostetter joined the rioters on the Lower West Terrace of the Capitol who were pushing through a line of law enforcement officers trying to hold them back. Hostetter and a co-conspirator then pushed through the law enforcement line, moved through restricted areas of the grounds, and climbed into scaffolding covering a northwest set of stairs leading to the Inaugural stage.

Hostetter finally arrived at the Upper West Terrace. Here, he stated in a recorded video, “The people have taken back their house. I don’t think I’ve ever seen such a beautiful sight in my whole life. We’ve been sitting here, quietly for years, watching this corruption unfold. Hundreds of thousands of patriots showed up today to take back their government.” Hostetter remained on the Upper West Terrace for hours. While there, he carried his bullhorn and used it to encourage the crowd. Hostetter finally left the area after being forced out by police.

Hostetter later posted a picture of himself taken from the Upper West Terrace to an Instagram account that he controlled, writing, “This was the shot heard round the world! … 2021 version of 1776. That war lasted 8 years. We are just getting started.”

Hostetter was arrested on June 2021, in California by the FBI.

On November 7, 2023, four of Hostetter’s co-defendants — Erik Warner, Felipe Antonio “Tony” Martinez, Derek Kinnison, and Ronald Mele — were convicted by a jury of, among other offenses, conspiring to obstruct an official proceeding. Hostetter’s co-defendant, Russel Taylor, previously pleaded guilty to conspiring to obstruct an official proceeding. These defendants are awaiting sentencing.

This case was prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia and the Department of Justice National Security Division’s Counterterrorism Section. Valuable assistance was provided by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California.

This case was investigated by the FBI’s Los Angeles Field Office, as well as the Metropolitan Police Department and U.S. Capitol Police, with significant assistances provided by the FBI’s Washington Field Office.

In the 35 months since Jan. 6, 2021, more than 1,230 individuals have been charged in nearly 50 states for crimes related to the breach of the U.S. Capitol, including more than 440 individuals charged with assaulting or impeding law enforcement, a felony. The investigation remains ongoing.

December 8, 2023: CNN Politics reported: “Former police chief sentenced to 11 years for involvement in January 6, Capitol attack”

A former California police chief who brought a hatchet to the Capitol on January 6, 2021, and gave prior speeches calling for the execution of his perceived political enemies, was sentenced to 11 years in prison Thursday.

Alan Hostetter, 59, was sentenced to 135 months — a little over 11 years — Thursday by U.S. District Judge Royce C. Lamberth, for his involvement in the Capitol riot.

In July, Hostetter was found guilty of conspiring to obstruct an official proceeding, obstruction of an official proceeding, entering and remaining in a restricted building or grounds with a deadly or dangerous weapon, and disorderly or disruptive conduct in a restricted building or grounds with a deadly or dangerous weapon.

Prior to the Capitol riots, a pro-Trump rally a day before the Capitol riot spewing violent rhetoric in speeches in DC on January 5. The next day, Hostetter brought tactical gear, a helmet, hatchets, knives, stun batons, pepper spray and other gear to the Capitol, according to the Department of Justice.

Upon arrival, he met up with other members of a group known as the “DC Brigade,” before joining the “Stop the Steal” rally. He later made his way to the Capitol building, where he joined other rioters pushing through law enforcement.

Hostetter was arrested on June 10, 2021, in California by the FBI.

Four of his co-defendants were convicted in November of conspiring to obstruct an official proceeding and a fifth co-defendant, Russell Taylor, previously pleaded guilty to conspiring to obstruct an official proceeding, according to the release.


November 7, 2023: United States Attorney’s Office – District of Columbia posted: “Texas Man Sentenced to More than 11 Years in Prison for Conspiracy To Obstruct Congress and Other Charges During Jan. 6, Capitol Breach”

GOVERMENT’S SENTENCING MEMORANDUM

The United States of America, by and through its attorney, the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia, respectfully submits this sentencing memorandum in connection with the above-captioned matter. For the reasons set forth herein, the government requests that this Court sentence Kevin Danial Loftus (“Loftus”) to thirty (30) days’ incarceration, three (3) years’ probation, and sixty (60) hours of community service, and order him to pay restitution in the amount of $500, as he agreed to do in the guilty plea agreement.

I. Introduction

The defendant, Kevin Daniel Loftus (“Loftus”), participated in the January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol — a violent attack that forced an interruption of the certification of the 2020 Electoral College vote count threatened the peaceful transfer of power after the 2020 Presidential election, injured more than one hundred police officers, and resulted in more than one million dollars of property damage.

Loftus pleaded guilty to one count of 40 U.S.C. 5104(e)(2)(G): Parading, Demonstrating, or Picketing in the Capitol Building. As explained herein, a sentence of thirty (30) days’ incarceration is appropriate in this case because:

(1) Loftus came to Washington D.C., from Wisconsin on or about January 4 to attend the “Stop the Steal rally;

(2) on January 6, Loftus attended the “Stop the Steal” rally and then marched to the U.S. Capitol;

(3) after arriving at the U.S. Capitol, Loftus illegally and without permission walked inside the U.S. Capitol where he took several photos of himself and others inside the U.S. Capitol;

(4) on January 7, Loftus wrote on his Facebook account that he was wanted by the FBI, and he identified himself as one of the individuals pictured in an FBI release of suspects wanted in this investigation;

(5) also on that date, Loftus wrote on his Facebook account, “One of the 700” referencing individuals inside the U.S. Capitol. Loftus also wrote, “That is a right folks some of us are in it to win it;” and

(6) on January 9, 2021, during an interview of Loftus conducted by the FBI in Eau Claire, Wisconsin, he admitted to walking inside the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021.

Loftus also was an active-duty soldier in the United States Army for six years, and his participation in the January 6 attack on the Capitol was at odds with his prior commitment to protect and defend the United States and the Constitution.

Even if he did not personally engage in violence or property destruction during the riot, before entering the Capitol on January 6, Loftus celebrate the violence of that day. Loftus posted videos to his Facebook account of the attack on the U.S. Capitol and exclaimed that he and others were “in it to win it,” presumably referring to the efforts of many of the January 6 rioters, including himself, to disrupt the Congressional certification of the 2020 Electoral College vote.

The Court must also consider that Loftus’ conduct on January 6, like the conduct of scores of other defendants, took place in the context of a large and violent riot that relied on numbers to overwhelm police, breach the Capitol, and disrupt the proceedings. But for his actions alongside so many others the riot likely would have failed to delay the certification vote.

(“A mob isn’t a mob without the numbers. The people who were committing those violent acts did so because they had the safety of numbers.”) (statement by Judge Chutkan). Here, Loftus’ participation in a riot that actually succeeded in halting the Congressional certification of the Electoral College vote, his celebration and endorsement of the violence on that day, and his lack of remorse renders a sentence of thirty (30) days’ incarceration, three (3) years’ probation, and sixty (60) hours of community service appropriate.

II. Factual and Procedural Background

The January 6, 2021 Attack on the Capitol

To avoid exposition, the government refers to the general summary of the attack on the U.S. Capitol. (Statement of Offense), at 1-3. As this court knows, a riot cannot occur without rioters, and each rioter’s actions — from the most mundane to the most violent — contributed, directly and indirectly, to the violence and destruction of that day. With that backdrop we turn to the defendant’s conduct and behavior on January 6.

Kevin Daniel Loftus’ Role in the January 6, 2021 Attack on the Capitol

Loftus came to Washington, D.C., from Wisconsin on or about January 4 to attend the “Stop the Steal” rally. On January 6, Loftus attended the “Stop the Steal” rally and then marched to the U.S. Capitol. Subsequently, after arriving at the U.S. Capitol, Loftus illegally and without permission walked inside the U.S. Capitol. As outlined in the following series of photographs, Loftus (circled in red below) can be seen unlawfully entering the U.S. Capitol and exiting after spending approximately four minutes and 50 seconds inside.

In addition, Loftus took several photo of himself and others inside the U.S. Capitol. On or about January 7, Loftus bragged on his Facebook account that he was wanted by the FBI, and he identified himself as one of the individuals pictured in an FBI release of suspects wanted in the investigation. In addition, on or about January 7, Loftus also wrote, “The is right folks some of us are in it to win it.”

Loftus’ FBI Interview

On or about January 8, 2021, during an interview of Loftus conducted by the FBI in Eau Claire, Wisconsin, Loftus admitted, inter alia, that he climbed up on a scaffolding at the U.S. Capitol for a good view and to take pictures and he walked inside the U.S. Capitol on what he thought was the top floor of the U.S. Capitol where Loftus took several photos and he later posted items on social media. Loftus also stated that he did not touch or hurt anyone.

The Charges and Plea Agreement

On January 11, 2021, Kevin Daniel Loftus was charged by complaint with violating 18 U.S.C. 1752(a)(1) and (2) and 40 U.S.C 5104(e)(2)(A) and (G). On January 12, 2021, he was arrested at his home in Wisconsin. On February 4, 2021, Loftus was charged by four-count Information with violating 18. U.S.C. 1752(a)(1) and (2) and 40 U.S.C. 5104(e)(2)(D) and (G). On October 19, 2021, Loftus pleaded guilty to Count four of the Information, charging him with a violation of 40 U.S.C 5104(e)(2)(D), Disorderly Conduct in the Capitol Building. By plea agreement, Loftus agreed to pay $500 in restitution to the Department of the Treasury.

III. Statutory Penalties

Loftus now faces a sentencing on a single count of 40 U.S.C. 5104(e)(2)(D). As noted by the plea agreement and the U.S. Probation Office, Loftus faces up to six months of imprisonment and a fine of $5,000. Loftus must also pay restitution under the terms of his plea agreement. As this offense is a Class B Misdemeanor, the Sentencing Guidelines do not apply to it.

IV. Sentencing Factors Under 18 U.S.C. 3553(a)

In this misdemeanor case, sentencing is guided by 18 U.S.C. 3553(a), which identifies the factors a court must consider in formulating the sentence. Some of those factors include: the nature and circumstances of the offense, 3553(a)(1); the history and characteristics of the defendant, the need for the sentence to reflect the seriousness of the offense and promote respect for the law 3553(a)(2)(A); the need for the sentence to afford adequate deterrence, 3553(a)(2)(B); and the need to avoid unwarranted sentence disparities among defendants with similar records who have been found guilty of similar conduct. 3553(a)(6). In this case, as describe below, the Section 3553(a) factors weigh in favor of thirty (30) days’ incarceration, three (3) years’ probation, and sixty (60) hours of community service.

A. The Nature and Circumstances on the Offense

The attack on the U.S. Capitol, on January 6, 2021, is a criminal offense unparalleled in American history. It represented a grave threat to our democratic norms. It was the one of the only times in our history when the building was literally occupied by hostile participants. The attack defies comparison to other events.

While each defendant should be sentenced based on their individual conduct, this Court should note that each person who entered the Capitol on January 6 without authorization did so under the most extreme of circumstances. As they entered the Capitol, they would — at a minimum — have crossed through numerous barriers and barricades and heard the throes of a mob. Depending on the timing and location of their approach, they also may have observed extensive fighting with police officers and smelled chemical irritants in the air. No rioter was a mere tourist that day.

Additionally, while looking at Loftus’s individual conduct, the Court must assess such conduct on a spectrum. This Court, in determining a fair and just sentence on this spectrum, should look to a number of critical factors, to include: (1) whether, when, how the defendant entered the Capitol building; (2) whether the defendant encouraged violence; (3) whether the defendant encouraged property destruction; (4) the defendant’s reaction to acts of violence or destruction; (5) whether during or after the riot, the defendant destroyed evidence; (6) the length of the defendant’s time inside of the building, and exactly where the defendant traveled; (7) the defendant’s statements in person or on social media; (8) whether the defendant cooperated with, or ignored commands from police officers; and (9) whether the defendant demonstrated sincere remorse or contrition. While these factors are not exhaustive nor dispositive, they help to place each defendant on a spectrum as to his fair and just punishment.

To be clear, had Loftus personally engaged in violence or destruction, he would be facing additional charges and/or penalties associated with that conduct. The absences of violent or destructive acts on the part of Loftus is therefore not a mitigating factor in misdemeanor cases, nor does it meaningfully distinguish Loftus from most other misdemeanor defendants.

Loftus’s lack of violence and property destruction explains why he was charged only with, and permitted to plead guilty to, a misdemeanor rather than felony.

More broadly, Loftus’ statements on social media during and after the attack demonstrate a total lack of remorse for his criminal conduct on January 6. Loftus bragged that he was wanted by the FBI, and he identified himself as one of the individuals pictured in an FBI release of suspects wanted in the investigation. Loftus also wrote that he was “One of 700” individuals unlawfully inside the U.S. Capitol, and that, like the others, he was “in it to win it.:

Accordingly, the nature and the circumstances of this offense establish the clear need for a sentence of thirty (30) days’ incarceration, three (3) years’ probation, and sixty (60) hours of community service.

Defendants Conduct While on This Court’s Release Status

One of the most important factors in distinguishing a possible sentence of home detention and that of incarceration is Loftus’s conduct while on release in this very case. As set forth below, on or about August 13, 2021, Loftus — under the alias “Zoso” sent individuals (whose screen names and posts are redacted herein) a series of messages on a social media game application site. In those messages, Loftus boasted that he “already” possessed various firearms, and so was not worried that he would be prevented from buying any more as a condition of his sentence.

In addition, Loftus made several statements regarding this case and celebrated that he was now “famous” and a “hero” for his illegal actions on January 6, 2021. Loftus also stated that he gained that fame by “standing up for all Americans” because he “broke the law,” and that he would file lawsuits against unidentified persons after the criminal case was over.

B. Loftus’ History and Characteristics

Loftus has a disturbing 25-year history of failing to obey the law. Loftus has four convictions of DUI, one for reckless driving, and another conviction for theft, spread out over fifteen years.

Loftus served six years in the United States Army. As Judge Nichols observed, this is a double-edged sword. On one hand, Loftus is to be commended for his military service to this country, particularly sine he served two tours of duty overseas. On the other hand, his participation in a violent attack on the U.S. Capitol and his belief that his conduct on January 6 was an act of patriotism that made him a “local hero” is the antithesis of patriotism and heroism that characterizes the vast majority of this country’s military veterans.

C. The Need for the Sentence Imposed to Reflect the Seriousness of the Offense and Promote Respect for the Law

The attack on the U.S. Capitol building and grounds was an attack on the rule of law. “The violence and destruction of property at the U.S. Capitol on January 6 showed a blatant and appalling disregard for our institutions of government and the orderly administration of the democratic process.”

As with the nature of the offense, this factor supports a sentence of incarceration, as it will in most cases, including misdemeanor cases, arising out of the January 6 riot. (“As to probation, I don’t think anyone should start off in these cases with any presumption of probation. I think the presumption should be that these offenses were an attack on our democracy and that jail time is usually — should be expected”) (statement of Judge Hogan).

D. The Need for the Sentence to Afford Adequate Deterrence

Deterrence encompasses two goals; general deterrence, or the need to deter crime generally, and specific deterrence, or the need to protect the public from further crimes by this defendant. 18 U.S.C. 3553(a)(2)(B-C).

General Deterrence

The demands of general deterrence weigh in favor of incarceration, as they will for nearly every case arising out of the violent riot at the Capitol. Indeed, general deterrence may be the most compelling reason to impose a sentence of incarceration. The violence at the Capitol on January 6 was intended to interfere, and did interfere, with one of the most important democratic processes we have; the peaceful transfer of power to a newly elected President.

As noted by Judge Moss during sentencing:

[D]emocracy requires the cooperation of the governed. When a mob is preparing to attack the Capitol to prevent our elected officials from both parties from performing their constitutional and statutory duty, democracy is in trouble. The damage that [the defendant] and others caused that day goes way beyond the several-hour delay in the certification. It is a damage that will persist in this country for decades.

Indeed, the attack on the Capitol means “that it will be harder today than it was seven months ago for the United States and our diplomats to convince other nations to pursue democracy. It means that it will be harder for all of us to convince our children and our grandchildren that democracy stands as the immutable foundation of this nation.

The gravity of the offenses demands deterrence. This was not a protest. (“I don’t think that any plausible argument can be made defending what happened in the Capitol on January 6th as the exercise of First Amendment rights.”) (statement of Judge Moss). And it is important to convey to future potential rioters — especially those who intend to improperly influence the democratic process — that their actions will have consequences. There is possibility no greater factor that this Court must consider.

The Need to Avoid Unwarranted Sentencing Disparities

As the Court is aware, the government has charged over 700 individuals for their roles in this one-of-a-kind assault on the Capitol, ranging from unlawful entry misdemeanors, such as in this case, to assault police officers, to conspiracy to corruptly interfere with Congress. Each offender must be sentenced based on their individual circumstances, but with the backdrop of the January 6 riot in mind.

Moreover, each offender’s case will exist on a spectrum that ranges from meriting a probationary sentence to crime necessitating years of imprisonment. The misdemeanor defendants will generally fall on the lower end of that spectrum, but misdemeanor breaches of the Capitol on January 6, 2021, were not minor crimes. A probationary sentence should not become default.

The government and the sentencing courts have already begun to make meaningful distinctions between offenders. Those who engaged in felonious conduct are generally more dangerous, and thus, treated more severely in terms of their conduct and subsequent punishment.

Those who trespassed, but engaged in aggravating factors, merit serious consideration of institutional incarceration. Those who trespassed, but engaged in less serious aggravating favors, deserve a sentence more in line with minor incarceration or home detention.

For one thing, although all the other defendants discussed below participated in the Capitol breach on January 6, 2021, many salient differences — such as how a defendant entered the Capitol, how long he remained inside, the nature of any statements he made (on social media or otherwise), whether he destroyed evidence of his participation breach, etc. — help explain the differing recommendations and sentences.

And as that discussion illustrates, avoiding unwarranted disparities requires the courts to consider not only a defendant’s “records” and “conduct” but other relevant sentencing criteria, such as a defendant’s expression of remorse or cooperation with law enforcement…

…In any event, the goal of minimizing unwarranted sentencing disparities in 3553(a)(6) is “only one of several factors that must be weighted and balanced,” and the degree of weight is “firmly committed to the discretion of the sentencing judge.

The 3553(a) factors that this Court assesses are “open-ended,” with the result that “different district courts may have distinct sentencing philosophies and may emphasize and weight the individual 3553(a) factors differently; and every sentencing decision involves its own set of facts and circumstances regarding the offense and the offender.”

“[D]ifferent district courts can and will sentence differently — differently from the Sentencing Guidelines range, differently from the sentencing of an appellate court might have imposed, and differently from how other courts might have sentenced that defendant.”

Simply stated, the government (and this Court) should not ignore Loftus’ bombastic rhetoric, if no hubris, during the pendency of this case. As discussed supra, Loftus flaunted the severity of these crimes, and showcased his unwillingness or inability to take this process seriously. Rather, Loftus was fond of his newfound “fame”, and considered himself a “hero”, a startling take on the events of January 6. This all suggests that while this Court should and must be focused on rehabilitation, punishment is an appropriate goal at sentencing too.

V. Conclusion

Sentencing requires the Court to carefully balance the 3553(a) factors. As explained herein, some of those factor support a sentence of incarceration and some support a more lenient sentence. Balancing these factors, the government recommends that this Court sentence Kevin Daniel Loftus to thirty (30) days’ incarceration, three (3) years’ probation, and sixty (60) hours of community service. Such a sentence protects the community, promotes respect for the law, and deters future crime by imposing restrictions on his liberty as a consequence of his behavior, while recognizing his early acceptance of responsibility.

November 8, 2023: The Associated Press reported: “4 California men linked to the Three Percenters militia convicted of conspiracy in Jan. 6 case”

Four California men linked to the “Three Percenters” militia movement have been convicted charges including conspiracy and obstruction for their roles in the Jan. 6, 2021 riot at the U.S. Capitol.

Erik Scott Warner, 48, of Menifee,; Felipe Antonio Martinez, 50, of Lake Elsinore; Derek Kinnison, 42, of Lake Elsinore; and Ronald Mele, 54, of Temecula, were found guilty on Tuesday after a trial in Washington’s federal court, according to prosecutors.

They were convicted of conspiracy and obstruction of an official proceeding — the joint session of Congress in which lawmakers met to certify President Joe Biden as the winner of the 2020 election.

Attorneys for Martinez and Warner declined to comment, and emails seeking comment were sent to an attorney for Mele.

Kinison’s lawyer, Nicolai Cocis, said he is disappointed with the verdict and they are considering all available legal options.

“Mr. Kinnison is a patriotic citizen who wanted to show his support for President Trump, who he believed was the rightful winner of the 2020 election. He regrets his involvement in the events of January 6,” Cocis said in an email.

Prosecutors say the men were part of the Three Percenters militia in Southern California. The Three Percenters militia movement refers to the myth that only 3% of Americans fought in the Revolutionary War against the British.

They were charged in 2021 alongside Alan Hostetter, a former California police chief, right-wing activist and vocal critic of COVID-19 restrictions, who was convicted in July in a separate trial.

The four men joined a telegram chat with Hostetter and Taylor called “The California Patriots — DC Brigade” to coordinate plans for coming to Washington. Taylor posted that he created the group for “fighters” who were expected to bring “weaponry” and body armor with them to Washington on Jan. 6, according to prosecutors.

Warner, Martinez, Kinnison and Mele drove cross country together days before the riot. On Jan. 6, Warner entered the Capitol through a broken window. Meanwhile, Martinez, wearing a tactical vest, and Kinnison, who was wearing a gas mask, joined rioters on the Capitol’s Upper West Terrace, according to the indictment. Mele, who was also wearing a tactical vest, proclaimed “Storm the Capitol!” in a “selfie” style video on the stairs of the building, prosecutors say.

Warner and Kinnison, who were accused of deleting the “DC Brigade” chat from their phones after the riot, were also convicted of tampering with documents or proceedings.

Nearly 1,200 people have been charged with Capitol riot-related federal crimes. Over 800 of them have pleaded guilty or been convicted by a jury or judge after a trial. Approximately 700 of them have been sentenced, with roughly two-thirds receiving terms of imprisonment ranging from three days to 22 years.

December 13, 2024: The Associated Press reported: “Capitol rioter who tried to join the Russian army is sentenced to prison for probation violation.” It was written by Michael Kunzelman.

A Dallas man who tried to fly overseas to join the Russian military and fight against Ukraine was sentenced on Friday to six months in prison for violating the terms of his probation for storming the U.S. Capitol four years ago.

Kevin Loftus, a 56-year-old veteran of the U.S. Army, was stopped from boarding an Oct. 28 flight from Dallas to Tbilisi, Georgia, by way of Istanbul, Turkey, when Turkish Airlines identified a “security flag” associated with him, according to federal prosecutors.

Loftus didn’t have the court’s permission to secure a 90-day visa to travel to Russia, where he intended to apply for temporary residency. Loftus said he used the Telegram messaging platform to communicate with a man who would connect him with the Russian Territorial Defense Unit, a volunteer military corps.

“Loftus said he had already sent the man approximately $1200 to purchase equipment for Russian soldiers,” prosecutors wrote. “Loftus said his intent was to fight for Russian and against Ukraine.”

Loftus declined to address the court before U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich sentenced him for the probation violation. The judge said Loftus has repeatedly violated court orders.

“He doesn’t think these rules should apply to him,” Friedrich said. “He wants to be above the law.”

Defense attorney Benjamin Schiffelbein said Loftus wanted to enlist in the Russian military because he “felt bad” for Russian soldiers and wanted to help them.

“He had no idea whether they could make use of him,” the lawyer said.

Loftus, a six-year Army veteran, intended to permanently relocate to another country, according to prosecutors.

“And his planned travel was for the express purpose of joining a foreign army to take up arms against one of this country’s allies and in opposition to this country’s foreign policy,” they wrote.

In January 2021, Loftus traveled from Wisconsin to Washington, D.C., to attend then-President Donald Trump’s “Stop the Steal” rally near the White House. After joining the mob of Trump supporter at the Capitol, he entered the building and took photographs. He spent approximately five minutes inside the Capitol.

Loftus was arrested at his Wisconsin home several days after the riot. He pleaded guilty in October 2021 to a misdemeanor count of parading, demonstrating, or picketing in a Capitol building.

After his arrest, Loftus posted comments about his case on social media, referring to himself as “famous” and a “hero” for taking part in the Jan. 6 attack.

“Loftus also stated that he gained that fame by ‘standing up for all Americans’ because he ‘broke the law,’ and he would file lawsuits against unidentified persons after the criminal case was over,” prosecutors wrote.

Prosecutors recommended 30 days of imprisonment for Loftus, but Friedrich initially sentenced him to three years of probation.

For his probation violation, prosecutors requested a six-month prison sentence. They noted the Loftus, while on probation, also was arrested in December 2023 and charged with driving while intoxicated in Richardson, Texas. Loftus was required to attend a substance abuse program, but he avoided jail time for that violation.

Over 1,500 people have been charged with Capitol riot-related crimes. More than 1,000 of them have been convicted and sentenced, with roughly two-thirds receiving a term of imprisonment ranging from a few days to 22 years.

Trump has repeatedly vowed to pardon Capitol rioters, but the district court judges in Washington, D.C., typically have refused to postpone sentencing, plea hearings and trials until after the president-elect returns to the White House.


Tennessee Man Pleads Guilty to Assaulting Law Enforcement During Jan. 6 Capitol Breach

December 17, 2024: United States Attorney’s Office District of Columbia posted: “Tennessee Man Pleads Guilty to Assaulting Law Enforcement During the Jan. 6 Capitol Breach”.

A Tennessee man pleaded guilty today to assaulting law enforcement officers during the Jan. 6, 2021, breach of the U.S. Capitol. His alleged actions and the actions of others disrupted a joint session of the U.S. Congress convened to ascertain and count the electoral votes related to the 2020 presidential election.

Nicholas Waldon Smotherman, 41, of Mt. Juliet, Tennessee, pleaded guilty in U.S. District Court to the felony offense of assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers. The offense carries a maximum penalty of eight years in prison. A sentencing date is set for April 2025.

According to court documents, Smotherman was identified among a crowd of rioters on Jan. 6, 2021, amassed on the Upper West Plaza of the U.S. Capitol grounds. At approximately 2:28 p.m., a Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) officer’s body-worn camera captured Smotherman wearing body armor — specifically, a green MSA Paraclete Tactical Vest — standing in front of the bike racks and a police line on the southwest side of the Upper West Plaza.

Here, a group of rioters had begun pulling on the back racks. Smotherman was seen on body-worn camera next to the group, appearing to advance toward at an MPD officer. Police then commanded the rioters to move back. Instead, the rioters pulled the bike rack barricades to the ground, and Smotherman moved forward towards the police line. Smotherman then approached an MPD officer and pushed the officer with both hands.

The officer then attempted to push Smotherman back using a baton, but Smotherman stood upright and yelled, “Hit me with it again.” when the officer again attempted to push Smotherman back, Smotherman grabbed the officer’s baton and attempted to pull it away. As Smotherman acted, he yelled “I’ll f– take this” and “Come out here b –“. The officer managed to prevent Smotherman from taking the baton while another officer deployed pepper spray, and Smotherman retreated.

Soon after this, rioters overran the police line on the Upper West Plaza, and officers retreated to the Lower West Terrace. A large crowd of rioters then gathered in and around the entrance to the Lower west Terrace Door, referred to as the “Tunnel,” the site of some of the most violent attacks against law enforcement on January 6th. Smotherman was later identified in and around the Tunnel.

The FBI arrested Smotherman on August 2, 2024, in Hermitage, Tennessee.

This case was prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia and the Department of Justice National Security Division’s Counterterrorism Section. Valuable assistance was provided by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Tennessee.

The matter was investigated by the FBI’s Nashville and Washington Field Offices. Valuable assistance was provided by the U.S. Capitol Police and the Metropolitan Police Department. Smotherman was indemnified as Assault on Federal Officer (AFO) #364/

In the 47 months since Jan. 6, 2021, more than 1,572 individuals have been charged in nearly all 50 states for crimes rated to the breach of the U.S Capitol, including more than 590 individuals charged with assaulting or impeding law enforcement, a felony. The investigation remains ongoing.

December 18, 2024: The Tennessean reported: “Middle Tennessee man pleads guilty to assaulting a law enforcement officer, more in 2021 US Capital attack” It was written by Craig Shoup.

A Tennessee man pleaded guilty Tuesday to assaulting a law enforcement officer during the Jan. 6, 2021 breach of the U.S. Capitol.

Nicholas Waldon Smotherman, 41, of Mt. Juliet, pleaded guilty to multiple felonies, during the Jan. 6, 2021 breach of the U.S. Capitol.

Smotherman is scheduled to be sentenced on April 23.

“His alleged actions and the actions of others disrupted a joint session of the U.S. Congress convened to ascertain and count the electoral votes related to the 2020 presidential election,” a spokesperson with the United States District of Columbia said in a release.

Court documents show Smotherman was identified among a crowd of rioters on Jan. 6, 2021, who were amassed on the Upper West Plaza of the U.S. Capitol grounds.

The attorney’s office said the group of rioters began pulling on bike racks. Smotherman was seen on body-worn cameras next to the group appearing to advance toward police officers. When police commanded the rioters to move back, they pulled the bike rack barricade to the ground. Smotherman moved forward to the police line and then approached police and pushed an officer with both hands, prosecutors said.

The officer then attempted to push Smotherman back using a baton, but Smotherman stood upright and yelled, “Hit me with it again.” When the officer attempted to push Smotherman back, Smotherman grabbed the officer’s baton and tried to pull it away. As Smotherman acted, he yelled “I’ll f– take this” and “Come out her b—“. The officer managed to prevent Smotherman from taking the baton while another officer deployed pepper spray, and Smotherman retreated, the attorney’s office said.

After rioters overran the police line in the Upper West Plazas, a large crowd gathered around the entrance of the Lower West Terrace door, where some of the most violent attacks took place against law enforcement. Smotherman was later identified in and around the area.

The federal Bureau of Investigation arrested Smotherman on Aug. 2, 2024. in Hermitage.

He was among more than 1,572 people who have been arrested in connection with the riots on Jan. 6, 2021.

December 19, 2024: Yahoo! News reported: “Mt. Juliet man pleads guilty to assaulting authorities during Jan. 6. Capitol insurrection” It was written by Colleen Guerry.

A Mt. Juliet man pleaded guilty Tuesday to assaulting law enforcement during the breach of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) said 41-year-old Nicholas Waldon Smotherman pleaded guilty on Tuesday, Dec. 17, in U.S. District Court to felony assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers, which carries a penalty of up to eight years in prison. His sentencing date is set for April 23, 2025.

According to court documents, Smotherman was identified among a crowd of rioters on Jan. 6, 2021, on the Upper West Plaza of the U.S. Capitol grounds. Shortly before 2:30 p.m., a Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) officer’s body-worn camera captured Smotherman wearing body armor as he stood in front of the bike racks and a police line on the southwest side if the plaza.

The DOJ said Smotherman could be seen on the bodycam footage next to a group on the bike racks, appearing to advance toward an MPD officer. Police commanded the rioters to move back, but they pulled the bike rack barricades to the ground. Meanwhile, Smotherman moved forward the police line, approached an MPD officer, and pushed the officer with both hands.

Officials said the officer attempted to push Smotherman back using a baton, but Smotherman stood upright and yelled, “Hit me with it again.” When the officer tried again, Smotherman grabbed the officer’s baton and attempted to pull it away while yelling “I’ll f— take this” and “Come out her b—“. The officer prevented Smotherman from taking the baton while another officer deployed pepper spray, which made Smotherman retreat.

Soon after, rioters overran the police on the Upper West Plaza, so officers retreated to the Lower West Terrace, the DOJ said. Then, a large crowd of rioters gathered in and around the entrance to the Lower West Terrace door, which officials referred to as the ‘Tunnel,” calling it “the site of some of the most violent attacks against law enforcement” on Jan. 6, 2021. Smotherman was identified in and around the Tunnel.

According to officials, this case was prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia and the DOJ National Security Division’s Counterterrorism Section, with valuable assistance from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Tennessee. The FBI’s Nashville and Washington field offices investigated the matter, receiving help from the U.S. Capitol Police and the MPD.

“In the 47 months since Jan. 6, 2021, more than 1,572 individuals have been charged in nearly all 50 states for crimes related to the breach of the U.S. Capitol, including more than 590 individuals charged with assaulting or impeding law enforcement, a felony,” the DOJ said in a statement, adding the investigation remains ongoing.


Trump Lawsuits 0 comments on Insurrectionists Are Facing Consequences – Part 6

Insurrectionists Are Facing Consequences – Part 6

woman with handcuffs on by niu niu on Unsplash

Those who attacked their own nation’s Capitol failed to consider the consequences of doing so. This is part 5.

On January 6, 2021, a mob of Donald Trump supporters staged an insurrection at the U.S. Capitol building. The Guardian reported that people stormed the chambers of the House and Senate while the Electoral College votes were being tallied.


January 1, 2021: PhillyMag reported: “This South Jersey Woman Helped Lead the Charge Up the Capitol Steps” It was written by Victor Fiorillo.

Given the sheer number of people who turned up for the Capitol riot on January 6th and Washington D.C.’s proximity to Philadelphia, it was only a matter of time before folks from our area were identified in the scads of photos and videos of the day.

First, there was retired Delco firefighter Robert Sanford. Then came former Pennsylvania Academy of Fine Arts Student Andrew Wrigley. And now, we’ve learned that South Jersey activist Stephanie Hazelton (a.k.a. Ayla Wolf) was at the Capitol on that fateful day as well.

If her face seems familiar to you, it’s probably because we first told you about Hazelton back in May, when she was charged with violating one of New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy’s COVID shutdown orders by organizing and gathering outside Atilis Gym on Bellmawr. That’s the South Jersey gym that refused to close its doors to members amid the pandemic — and that has since refused to close its doors to members amid the pandemic — and that has since raised more than $450,000 (!!!) on GoFundMe for its legal defense.

According to videos and social media posts, Hazelton was in Washington, D.C., for the Capitol attack. In one since-deleted Facebook video, Hazelton showed herself in Washington that day. In another post, Hazelton wrote about details of the chartered bus trip from South Jersey to the capital. And two people on Facebook posed about her after the Capitol siege, writing that she had sustained injuries during the insurrection. These posts have since been deleted as well.

Hazelton also pops up in a lengthy video from the Capitol the appears to have been recorded by a far right outlet Just Another Channel and originally published on its Parler page, which has since been removed. The video still appears on YouTube, and Hazelton can be seen helping to lead the charge up the steps of the Capitol, the archway entrance just feet behind her.

In this one segment of the nearly 90-minute video, some Capitol attackers are walking away from the building, apparently suffering from the effects of tear gas, while others thrust forward toward the archway.

“We need more people!” shouts an unknown man. That’ when Hazelton chimes in “Men,” she says, her pink iPhone in her left hand. “We need more men!” She uses her right hand to wave people — well, people with penises — up the steps to join the charge. “Let’s go!” she orders them.

“We need more men,” says Hazelton, who didn’t respond to multiple comments for this story and deleted her Facebook account after we contacted her there. “Keep going. Keep pushing. Men! We need men. Not women.”

A feminist she is not.

In another segment, Hazelton appears to say that she has been inside the Capitol and intends to return to its hallowed halls.

“I gotta go back in,” she tells a man who was offering her water for her irritated eyes.

It’s unclear if Hazelton was ever actually inside the building. What’s also unclear is whether any law enforcement agencies is in pursuit of or even interested in her. (The FBI didn’t respond to a request for information.

The FBI is reportedly investigating some 140,000 images from the day.

October 14, 2022: United States Attorney’s Office District of Columbia posted a press release titled: “New Jersey Woman Pleads Guilty To Felony Charges For Actions During Jan. 6 Capitol Breach”

Defendant Encouraged Mob in Confrontations With Officers

A New Jersey woman pleaded guilty today to a felony charge for her actions during the breach of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Her actions and the actions of others disrupted a joint session of the U.S. Congress convened to ascertain and count the electoral votes related to the 2020 presidential election.

Stephanie Hazelton, 50, of Medford, New Jersey, pleaded guilty in the District of Columbia to interfering with law enforcement officers during a civil disorder and aiding and abetting.

According to court documents, on Jan. 6, 2021, Hazelton illegally entered the Capitol grounds and joined in multiple confrontations with law enforcement officers. At approximately 2:45 p.m., she approached the west front of the Capitol building and joined a mob there. As she approached, she made various statements encouraging the crowd, including, “Let’s go! Move forward! They cannot stop is all,” and, “This is the battle. This is it. This is the battle.”

Hazelton then approached the Lower West Terrace, which was packed with rioters pushing forward against law enforcement officers who were attempting to prevent the mob from moving through a tunnel and into the Capitol building. From outside the tunnel, she turned towards rioters, and waved them up, encouraging more to move into the area. She moved to the front of the mob, which was pushing against the officers. As others in the crowd assaulted officers, Hazelton remained in the area, yelling, among other things, “We need more men! We need more men! Keep going!”

Hazelton was arrested on Jan. 22, 2021. She is to be sentenced on Feb. 1. 2023. She faces a statutory maximum of five years in prison and potential financial penalties. A federal district court judge will determine any sentence after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia and the Justice Department’s National Security Division are prosecuting the case, with valuable assistance by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of New Jersey.

The case is being investigated by the FBI’s Newark Field Office. Valuable assistance was provided by the FBI’s Washington Field Office, the U.S. Capitol Police, and the Metropolitan Police Department.

In the 21 months, since Jan. 6, 2021, more than 880 individuals have been arrested in nearly all 50 states for crimes related to the breach of the U.S. Capitol, including over 270 individuals charged with assaulting or impeding law enforcement. The investigation remains ongoing.

October 14, 2022: Law & Crime posted “New Jersey Woman Who Shouted ‘We Need Men, Not Women!” as Trump Supporters Attacked Cops on Jan. 6 Pleads Guilty to a Felony” It was written by Matt Naham.

A 50-year-old anti-vaxxer and mom from South Jersey pleaded guilty to a felony Friday for her role in the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.

Stephanie Hazelton, a Medford resident also known as Ayla Wolf, was arrested on Jan. 22, 2021 and indicted on Nov. 10, 2021 for several charges, but she ultimately pleaded guilty to one felony for interfering with cops during a civil disorder and adding and abetting.

According to the factual stipulation in Hazelton’s plea agreement, the government’s statement of offense in her case is fair and accurate.

That statement of offense says Hazelton urged the pro-Donald Trump mob to “move forward” even as police officers attempted to repel it.

“They’re tear gassing everybody” and “They’re pepper spraying us,” she admitted shouted. “Let’s go! Move forward! They cannot stop us all!”

“We’re storming the Capitol right now!” she added, referring to the moment as “the battle.”

“Hazelton then approached the Lower West Terrace, which was packed with rioters pushing forward against law enforcement officers who were attempting to prevent the mob from moving through a tunnel and into the Capitol building,” the DOJ said in a press release about Hazleton’s actions that afternoon. “From outside the tunnel, she turned towards rioters, and waved them up, encouraging more to move into the area. She moved to the front of the mob, which was pushing against the officers.”

As that assault near the tunnel unfolded, Hazelton showed that more men were needed.

“We need more men! We need more men! Keep going! Keep pushing, men! We need men, not women!” she yelled “We need more helmets! More helmets!”

The day after Jan. 6, Hazelton texted that the “first shot has been fired of the revolution.”

Hazleton’s sentencing is set for Feb. 1, 2023.

The plea agreement shows that there is still some disagreement between prosecutors and the defense on one point: whether a three-point enhancement should apply.

“Your client understands that the Government maintains that, pursuant to U.S.S.G 2A2.4(b)(1)(A), a three-point enhancement applies because the offense involved physical contact,” the agreement said. “Your client agrees to the facts as stated in the Statement of Offense, but reserves the right to challenge the application of U.S.S.G. 2A1(b)(1)(A) solely on the grounds that her offense did not involve physical contact.”

The government laid out what the difference in estimated sentencing guidelines will be of the offense level ends up being an 8 or an 11 [emphasis theirs]

Based on the Estimated Offense Level and the Estimated Criminal History Category set forth above, your client’s offense level is 11, your client’s estimated Sentencing Guidelines range is 8 months to 14 months (the “Estimate Guidelines Range”). If your client’s offense is level 8, your client’s estimated Sentencing Guidelines range is 0 months to 6 months (the “Estimated Guidelines Range”).

In addition, the parties agree that, pursuant to U.S.S.G 5E1.2, should the Court impose a fine, at Guidelines level 11, the estimated applicable fine range is $4,000 to $40,000 and at the Guidelines level 8, the estimated applicable fine range is $2,000 to $20,000. Your client reserves the right to task the Court to impose any applicable fine.

May 31, 2023: Courier Post posted: “Medford woman known as Ayla Wolf to soon hear fate for ‘commander’ role in Capitol riot” It was written by Jim Walsh.

A Medford woman who took part in the Capitol riot left the disturbance with a finger broken by a police officer’s baton, court filings say.

Now, 51-year-old Stephanie Hazelton could face another painful consequence of her actions at the January 2021 insurrection.

A federal prosector wants a judge to sentence Hazelton to 11 months in prison, along with a $10,000 fine.

In a court filing, the prosecutor asserts Hazelton acted “like a commander on the battlefield,” shouting for “more men” and “more helmets” as she urged others to push past police officers guarding the Capitol.

But Hazelton’s attorney argues against prison in a rival sentencing memorandum.

That filing acknowledges Hazelton “shouted words of encouragement to rioters,” but adds she “deeply regrets her conduct and apologizes to the law enforcement offices who struggled in that chaotic scene.”

Stephanie Hazelton seeks lighter sentence for Capitol riot

Hazelton should be sentenced to no more than three months of home detention, two years on probation, and a “significant” fine, said defense attorney Nicholas D. Smith of New York City.

Smith’s filing says Hazelton survived a difficult childhood, including life in a religious commune with no plumbing, electricity, heat or phones.

She now dedicates “virtually all of her time” to two home-schooled sons, ages 11 and 12, with special needs that require the mother’s constant attention, the filing says.

The prosecution’s filing by Assistant U.S. Attorney Christopher Amore acknowledges the family’s challenges.

“But, sadly, crime carries consequences,” writes Assistant U.S. Attorney Christopher Amore.

He observes Hazelton’s “family circumstances also did not stop of prevent her involvement in the riot in the first place.”

Hazelton, also known as Alya Wolf, became more politically active during the pandemic and attended “medical freedom” rallies in New Jersey, according to letters of support that accompany her memorandum.

She recorded her approach to the Capitol with her cellphone, at one pointy saying, “This is the battle. This is it. This is the battle.”

The prosecution says Hazelton repeatedly went into a Capitol entranceway tunnel where rioters were assaulting police officers in a bid to overturn the election of President Joe Biden.

At one point, Amore’s filing says, Hazelton stood at the front of a mob that used strobe lights to hamper officers’ vision and struck at them with poles and batons.

It contends Hazelton should get the prison term because her presence in the entranceway “contributed to the massive number of rioters who pushed against and assaulted … officers for nearly two hours…”

But her attorney notes Hazelton never entered the Capitol itself, did not make physical contact with officers and did not destroy any property. He also says no direct link connects Hazelton’s words to a specific assault on any officer.

The defense filing says a police officer struck Hazelton with a baton while she was crouching with her hands over her head outside the entranceway.

It says an injury to Hazelton’s finger required reconstructive surgery.

Capitol rioters used strobe lights, batons and poles

The prosecution notes Hazleton wore tactical gloves while accompanying members of the New Jersey Sons of Liberty on the day of the riot. Others in the group wore tactical globes and vests, and carried riot shields.

One day later, the filing says, Hazelton wrote, “The first shot has been fired of the revolution.”

But Hazelton later tried to conceal her actions, saying, “I never came close to going in and I never saw any violence from the people,” according to the prosecution filing.

Hazelton, who was arrested 16 days after the riot, pleaded guilty in October 2022 to a charge of civil disorder and aiding and abetting.

The prosecution also wants Hazelton to pay $2,000 in restitution for damage caused by rioters and to spend 36 months on supervised release.

October 31, 2022: Courier Post posted: “Medford Woman allegedly described the Capitol riot as ‘first shot … of the revolution”. It was written by Jim Walsh.

A Medford woman allegedly urged rioters to storm the U.S. Capitol has admitted guilt to a charge arising from the Jan. 6 insurrection.

Stephane Hazelton said, “This is the battle” as she approached the Capitol during the violent incident in 2021, a court record alleges.

She texted the next day, “The first shot has been fired of the revolution,” according to an account agreed to by both sides of the case.

Hazelton, 50, pleaded guilty on Oct. 14 to a charge of civil disorder and aiding and abetting.

Hazelton, also known as Ayla Wolf, could face a possible prison term of eight to 14 months in prison under a sentencing guideline that would find her offense involved “physical contact.”

She is expected to challenge that guideline before the sentencing judge. If the challenge succeeds, a remaining guideline would recommend a lesser penalty of up to six months in prison, with the possibility of no time in custody, the plea agreement says.

Her attorney, Nicholas Smith of New York City, could not be reached for comment.

June 2, 2023: The Philadelphia Inquirer posted: “Prominent South Jersey anti-vax advocate sentenced to jail for directing rioters in Capitol attack” It was written by Jeremy Roebuck.

A prominent right-wing and anti-vaccine activist from South Jersey will serve 10 days behind bars for her role in some of the most brutal fighting during the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

Federal prosecutors likened Stephanie Hazelton, 51, of Medford — who also goes by Ayla Wolf — to “a commander on the battlefield” as she marshaled rioters toward the tunnel entrance to the Capitol’s west side.

“This is the battle,” she shouted in videos of the melee later posted online. “Let’s go! Move forward! They cannot stop us all!”

That clash for control over the entrance of the Lower West Terrace lasted over two hours, during which rioter repeatedly assaulted, threatened, pushed and beat police trying to keep them at bay.

“Hazelton went to Washington dressed for violence,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Christopher D. Amore said in court filings last week. “She came for revolution and participated in an assault on democracy the resulted in death, injury and destruction.”

Hazelton’s sentence makes her the latest New Jersey resident sentenced to incarceration for playing a role in the unprecedented riot, which interrupted the Congressional certification of President Joe Biden’s victory, caused more than $2.8 million in damage and left hundreds of officers injured.

But the punishment — handed down Thursday by U.S. District Judge John D. Bates at a hearing in Washington — could have been far worse. Prosecutors urged the judge to send Hazelton to prison for 11 months, at the top end of the suggested federal sentencing guidelines for the lone count of civil disorder to which she pleaded guilty last year.

But Bates — crediting Hazelton’s remote and the fact that she did not enter the Capitol or assault officers herself — ordered her incarcerated for a fraction of that time.

Hazelton’s lawyer, Nicholas D. Smith, described a short sentence as a just outcome for his client, whom he described as a stay-at-home mother who as raise on a religious commune outside of Trenton with no plumbing or electricity.

“She deeply regrets her conduct and apologizes to the law enforcement officers who struggled in that chaotic scene,” the lawyer wrote.

Hazelton — the founder of New Jersey for Medical Freedom, the state chapter of an anti-vaccine network — rose to prominence organizing demonstrations against proposed legislation in the Garden State, including a bill that would have required school children to get the flu shot.

In 2020, she led members of the group who draped signs over New Jersey highway overpasses that read: “COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers are exempt from liability.” And as for the public face for “Reopen New Jersey,” she led rallies that spring that made national headlines.

She was among the protesters who gathered outside Atilis Gym, the Bellmawr facility that defied Gov. Phil Murphy’s shutdown orders and drew attention for her particularly violent rhetoric about fighting a “war for freedom.”

“This war is just as important as our founding fathers,” she said to a crowd at the time. “We are the militia. We are the founding fathers. We are America.”

Prosecutors said Thursday that Hazelton adopted a similarly militaristic tone in the run-up to the Jan 6 attack.

Weeks after the election, she fraudulently boasted on Facebook that she had new from a “friend on the inside” that then-President Donald Trump had won “but the Deep State froze the election and they’re desperately trying to stuff ballots.”

Days before she traveled to Washington to protest the congressional certification of the 2020 vote, she posted again.

“There are police [that] are not on our side, especially in DC,” she wrote “A lot of them wish they were marching with [Black Lives Matter] in that city and hate us. We have to watch our backs.”

Video that later surfaced on social media showed her marching toward the Capitol with members of the New Jersey Sons of Liberty, donning tactical gloves and a black scarf bearing the organization’s skull logo.

She filmed their approach as they reached police lines shouting “I don’t care about their tear gas!”

During the two-hour battle for control of the Capitol’s lower west entrance, prosecutors say Hazelton could be seen in videos entering and exiting the fray again and again as rioters clashed with officers, beating them with poles and sticks and grabbing their police shields.

When she realized the crowd still wasn’t breaching the police lines, she called for reinforcements.

“We need more men,” she shouted while waiving rioter toward the entrance, according to the video of the fracas. “Keep pushing! Men! We need men! Not women!”

In court Thursday, Hazelton claimed she was acting in self-defense after one of the officers hit her with a nightstick and crushed her finger — an injury that later required reconstructive surgery.

She pleaded with Bates to spare her a prison term, given her role as the primary caretaker for her homeschooled 11- and 12-year-old sons while their father is frequently away on business trips.

Prosecutors, however, scoffed at that suggestion.

“Crimes carry consequences,” they said. “That fact cannot be a carte blanche to escape the consequences of criminal conduct … Moreover, her family circumstances did not stop or prevent her involvement in the riot in the first place.”

In addition to her jail term, Hazelton was ordered to serve two years’ probation upon her release and pay $2,000 in restitution.


January 8, 2021: United States District Court For The District of Columbia – Holding a Criminal Term. – Grand Jury Sworn in on January 8, 2021

COUNT ONE: On or about January 6, 2021, from about 4:10 p.m. to about 4:13 p.m., within the District of Columbia, EDWARD JACOB LANG committed and attempted to commit an act to obstruct, impede, and interfere with a law enforcement officer lawfully engaged in the lawful performance of his/her duties incident to and during the commission of a civil disorder, and the civil disorder obstructed, delayed, and adversely affected the conduct and performance of a federally protected function.

(Civil Disorder, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 231(a)(3))

COUNT TWO: On or about January 6, 2021, from about 4:10 p.m. to about 4:13 p.m., within the District of Columbia, EDWARD JACOB LANG did forcibly assault, resist, oppose, impede, intimidate, and interfere with, an officer of and employee of the Untied States, of any branch of the United States Government (including any member of the uniformed services), and any person assisting such an officer and employee, while such a person was engaged in and on account of the performance of official duties.

(Assaulting, Resisting, or Impeding Certain Officers, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 111(a)(1))

COUNT THREE: On or about January 6, 2021, from about 4:44 p.m. to about 4:46 p.m., within the District of Columbia, EDWARD JACOB LANG committed and attempted to commit an act to obstruct, impede, and interfere with a law enforcement officer lawfully engaged in the lawful performance of his/her official duties incident to and during the commission of a civil disorder, and the civil disorder obstructed, delayed, and adversely affected the conduct and performance of of a federally protected function.

(Civil Disorder, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 231(a)(3))

COUNT FOUR: On or about January 6, 2021, from about 4:44 p.m., to about 4:46 p.m., within the District of Columbia, EDWARD JACOB LANG, using a deadly or dangerous weapon, that is, a shield, did forcibly assault, resist, oppose, impede, intimidate and interfere with, an officer and employee of the Untied States, and any branch of the United States Government (including any member of the uniformed services), and any person assisting such an officer and employee, while such officer or employee was engaged in or on account of the performance of official duties.

(Assaulting, Resisting, or Impeding Certain Officers Using a Dangerous Weapon, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 111(a)(1) and (b))

COUNT FIVE: On or about January 6, 2021, from about 4:54 p.m., to about 4:57 p.m., within the District of Columbia EDWARD JACOB LANG committed and attempted to commit an act to obstruct, impede, and interfere with a law enforcement officer lawfully engaged in the lawful performance of his/her official duties incident to and during the commission of a civil disorder, and the civil disorder obstructed, delayed, and adversely affected the conduct and performance of a federally protected function.

(Civil Disorder, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 231(a)(3))

COUNT SIX: On or about January 6, 2021, from about 4:54 p.m., to about 4:57 p.m., within the District of Columbia, EDWARD JACOB LANG, using a deadly or dangerous weapon, that is, a bat, did forcibly assault, resist, oppose, impede, intimidate, and interfere with, an officer and employee of the United States, and of any branch of the United States Government (including any member of the uniformed services), and any person assisting such an officer and employee, while such officer was engaged in or on account of the performance of official duties.

(Assaulting, Resisting, or Impeding Certain Officers Using a Dangerous Weapon, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 111(a)(1)and(b))

COUNT SEVEN: On or about January 6, 2021, within the District of Columbia and elsewhere, EDWARD JACOB LANG, attempted to, and did, corruptly obstruct, influence and impede an official proceeding, that is, a proceeding before Congress, by entering and remaining in the United States Capitol without authority and committing an act of civil disorder and engaging in disorderly and disruptive conduct and destroying federal property.

(Obstruction of an Official Proceeding and Aiding and Abetting, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1512(c)(2)and 2)

COUNT EIGHT: On or about January 6, 2021, in the District of Columbia, EDWARD JACOB LANG did knowingly, and with intent to impede and disrupt conduct of Government business and official functions, engage in disorderly and disruptive conduct in and within such proximity to, a restricted building and grounds, that is, any posted, cordoned-off, or otherwise restricted area within the United States Capitol and its grounds, where the Vice President and Vice President-elect were temporarily visiting, when and so that such conduct did in fact impede and disrupt the orderly conduct of Government business and official functions and, during and in relation to the offense, did use and carry a deadly and dangerous weapon, that is, a bat and shield.

(Disorderly and Disruptive Conduct in a Restricted Building or Grounds, with a Deadly or Dangerous Weapon, in violation of title 18, United States Code, Section 1752(a)(2) and (b)(1)(A))

COUNT NINE: On or about January 6, 2021, in the District of Columbia, EDWARD JACOB LANG did knowingly, engage in any act of physical violence against any person and property in a restricted building and grounds, that is, posted, cordoned-off, or otherwise restricted area within the United States Capitol and its grounds, where the Vice President and Vice President-elect were temporarily visiting and, during and in relation to the offense, did use and carry a deadly and dangerous weapon, that is, a bat and shield.

(Engaging in Physical Violence in a Restricted Building or Grounds, with a Deadly or Dangerous weapon, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1752(a)(4)and (b)(1)(A))

COUNT TEN: On or about January 6, 2021, in the District of Columbia, EDWARD JACOB LANG willfully and knowingly engaged in disorderly and disruptive conduct in any of the Capitol Building with the intent to impede, disrupt, and disturb the orderly conduct of a session of Congress and either House of Congress, and the orderly conduct in that building of a hearing before or any deliberation of, a committee of Congress or either House of Congress.

(Disorderly Conduct in a Capitol Building, in violation of Title 40, United States Code, Section 5104(e)(2)(D))

COUNT ELEVEN: On or about January 6, 2021, in the District of Columbia, EDWARD JACOB LANG willfully and knowingly engaged in an act of physical violence within the United States Capitol Grounds and any of the Capitol Building.

(Act of Physical Violence in the Capitol Grounds or Building, in violation of Title 40, United States Code, Section 5104(e)(2)(F))

September 20, 2021: Courthouse News Service posted: “Rioter who hit police with baseball bat loses bid for jail release” It was written by Samantha Hawkins.

Despite the man’s claims of abuse in jail and other issues, a federal judge refused Monday to order the release of a 26-year-old who fought police for over two hours during the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol.

According to video evidence, some of which the upstate New York filmed himself, Edward Jacob Lang hit officers with an aluminum baseball bat and protective shields, and kicked an officer that was on the ground.

Lang has been charged with 13 counts, including several felonies, but his attorney’s say the defendant was a source of help that day to people who were being trampled of beaten by police officers. One individual even credits Lang for saving his life. “There was no intention to actually harm. it was more warning signs, more trying to separate two crowds, more adrenaline,” said Steven Alan Metcalf, Lang’s attorney. “This is about him jumping into a chaotic situation and doing what he can.”

At a hearing Monday in Washington, Lang told U.S. District Judge Carl J. Nichols that he was locked in his cell for 23 Horus a day during the first few months following his arrest. Lang says he has been physically and mentally abused by guards during the ongoing solitary confinement. He says his rations have been cut in half, he hasn’t been able to exercise his right to worship, and he hasn’t been able to shave, get a haircut, or even use nail clippers.

“I am currently locked in my cell for 18 and a half hours a day with sensory deprivation,” Lang said. “I’m deprive of so many things that I wouldn’t even be in the right mindset to help even if I were able to.”

In addition to jail conditions, Lang and his attorneys argue that it’s extremely difficult to communicate with each other. When his attorney’s visit, Lang talks to them through plexiglass, and everyone on Lang’s side can hear what he says. Lang also refused to get the vaccinate against the novel coronavirus, meaning he would need to quarantine for two weeks if he wanted to meet with his attorneys in a confidential setting face-to-face.

“Each time discovery is disclosed to us, they’ll be a delay in getting it to him,” Metcalf told Nichols.

Metcalf said that he has tried to send Lang two letters and an email containing discovery that were returned to him without reaching Lang. He argues the Lang needs to be released from jail to review dozens of hours of video evidence.

“The video was the first minute I’ve seen myself in 244 days,” Lang told Nichols, referencing a video of himself that was shown in his Monday court hearing. “I haven’t seen anything. It’s horrifying to me because I want to tell my side of the story.”

Nichols noted, however, that Lang’s defense attorneys haven’t even tried to use the jail’s laptops — which have long wait times and limited access. With this in mine, the judge said he isn’t prepared to modify Lang’s confinement conditions.

“How am I supposed to decide if the current policy is unworkable for you if you haven’t tried under the policy?” Nichols asked.

Nichols also said he would be willing to review a motion to modify Lang’s confinement conditions if they find the jail’s laptop policy to be unworkable. Until then, Lang will remain behind bars.

January 13, 2022: Times Union reported “Capitol riot defendant from Newburgh denied appeal for his release” It was written by Cloey Callahan.

Edward Jacob Lang will remain in jail after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia on Wednesday upheld a lower court judge’s decision to order Lang’s continued detention. The 26-year-old, who is originally from Sullivan County, was arrested in Neewbugh for his participation in the insurrection at the U.S. Capitol building on Jan. 6 last year, a riot that led to five deaths, the assault of some 140 police officers, and $1.5 million worth of damage to the Capitol.

The Appellate Court upheld the Sept. 20 decision by Judge Carl J. Nichols, writing: “The evidence proffered by the government shows that, over the course of two and a half hours on January 6, 2021, appellant repeatedly pushed, punched, and kicked at police officers defending the Lower West Terrace entrance to the Capitol building. He also slammed a door against one officer’s head and struck other officers first with a stolen riot shield and later with a metal baseball bat.”

The Appellate Court referenced another Jan. 6 case, United States vs Munchel, in their ruling: “As we explained in Munchel, ‘those who actually assaulted police officers … are in a different category of dangerousness than those who cheered on the violence or entered the Capitol after others cleared the way.”

Lang is awaiting trial after he was indicted on multiple felony charges in connection to the Capitol riot. He is accused of fighting for almost two and a half hours with besieged officers defending a Capitol entrance against the rioters. Photos of Lang in court paper show him swinging an aluminum baseball bat at police while wearing a gas mask and holding a police riot shield that he commandeered.

In August, Lang’s attorneys argued in a 27-page brief that Lang should be released from the Washington, D.C., jail because he poses no public danger or flight risk and has been unable to meet privately with them to prepare his defense. They also claimed the jail staff has unfairly put him in solitary confinement for long periods and abused him.

“Lang’s physical abuse includes being dragged, shoved, denied regular shower access, and getting an entire can of mace in his face, while standing inside of (his) cell with photos and a bible in his hand,” attorneys Martin Tankless and Steven Metcalf wrote.

Prosecutors argued to keep Lang in custody, citing the “overwhelmingly strong” evidence against him, the violence they say he committed and instigated, and his threats on social media after the riot to resort to guns next time.

Near the end of a court conference held by phone and video in the summer, Lang made an emotional plea to the judge about what he said were his “inhumane” jail conditions, saying “I have been stripped of all human dignity.”

Lang is the only suspect still being held in jail at the Hudson Valley residents charged with taking pat in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot. He is awaiting trial.

December 17, 2023: RiverReporter.com posted: “The Supreme Court agrees to hear case challenging obstruction charge”. It was written by Pamala Chergotis.

Edward (Jacob) Lang’s case took a positive tern last week when the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear a case brought by one of his January 6, co-defendants.

Lang, a former Narrowburg resident and Honesdale High School student, was arrested soon after the attack on the Capitol in 2021, when he lived in Newburgh, NY. He has been in prison ever since. His X (formerly Twitter) profile reads: “Jake Lang Jan 6 Political Prisoner for 1040 days without a trial.”

He is accused of wielding deadly weapons against Capitol police officers, including a bat and a shield. He is also charged with obstruction of an official proceeding, a charge that he and two other defendants — Garret Miller and Joseph Fischer — have challenged.

The Supreme Court on December 13 agreed to hear the case brought by Fischer to dismiss the obstruction charge. The court’s decision, expected by the end of June, will affect not only the three men but former President Trump and hundreds of other January 6 defendants who all face the same charge. The crime carries a maximum of 20 year in prison.

The defendants say the U.S. Justice Department is wrongly charging them under a statute created after the Enron scandal of the early 2000s. The energy company’s accounting firm was charged with obstruction for destroying millions of documents just as the Securities and Exchange Commission was beginning to investigate. The defendants say the statute, part of the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act, is not broad enough to apply to their cases.

The defendants were charged with obstruction for interrupting the joint session of Congress where lawmakers were certifying Electoral College votes.

The FBI made their case with numerous photos and videos posted by Lang and others who were at the Capitol that day. “In the video,” said one FBI agent’s affidavit, said “Lang swung, thrusted, and/or jabbed the bat at law enforcement officers multiple times. In doing so, LANG struck at least the shields the officers held in front of them. As the video progresses, others in the crowd assist in the attack, with some throwing items and one individual spraying the officers with a fire extinguisher.”

Last month, Lang reflected on his time behind bars. He posted on X, “This is my 3rd Thanksgiving away from my family in the basement of Washington DC Jail Gulag — in solitary confinement…

“Look for Christ at your Thanksgiving table this year, and know I am right there with him; me and all the Jan 6ers — pass the gravy! Enjoy & rejoice in your freedom — it isn’t free.

July 16, 2023: Just The News reported: “Jan 6 defendant appeals to Supreme Court in case that could upend hundreds of riot charges”

Jan. 6 defendant Edward Jacob Lang is asking the Supreme Court to hear his challenge against one of the 11 charges he was indicted on — obstruction of an official proceeding — in a case that could upend legal proceedings against hundreds of other defendants indicted on charges related to the Jan. 6, 2021, U.S. Capitol riot.

The obstruction charge could be levied against “anyone who attends at a public demonstration gone awry,” attorneys for Lang wrote in an appeal to the Supreme Court last week. The proceeding for which the charge was brought refers to the event where Congress certifies the Electoral College votes to confirm the president.

Lang had filed a motion to dismiss the obstruction charge, which carries a 20-year-sentence, before his trial, and the D.C. District court granted this motion. However, an appeals court reversed the lower court’s decision and a motion for rehearing was denied.

Lang’s attorney Norman Pattis told Newsweek that he thinks the Supreme Court could upend the cases of “hundreds of defendants.”

“The government misses and abuse of the federal penal code in the [January 6] case is shocking,” Pattis also said. His client expects to hear this fall whether the Supreme Court will take up the case.

Lang ha been incarcerated for more than 900 days without a trial. he told The Epoch Time that he thinks his appeal could impact the Justice Department’s separate effort to potentially charge former President Donald Trump with obstruction.

“I think the timing of this filing is astronomical,” Lang said. “Donald Trump is the political frontrunner for the Republican Party, and while the other bogus charges might easily go away through a plea deal, the obstruction of Congress charge carries prison time. This would land him in serious hot water with a conviction.”

January 16, 2024: Sullivan County Democrat posted: “Three Years Later”

Exactly three years later, January 6 defendant Edward (Jacob) Lang is still awaiting a trial for over a dozen charges related to his involvement in the assault on the Capitol building in 2021. After multiple pushbacks, his trial date is set for September 9.

This data would set his time awaiting a trial at 3 years and nine months.

Lang, 26, is a longtime resident of Narrowsburg and Honesdale High School graduate, and was arrested in Newburgh, where he was currently living, just 10 days after the raid.

He is the son of Sullivan County businessman, Ned Lang, owner of Lang EnvroVentures in Narrowsburg.

His trial date was moved twice last year. At first, it was switched to May, and then later shifted to October. However, his trial was put on hold once more due to a pending Supreme Court appeal that eyed the possibility of the elimination of one of his 13 federal charges.

One of those charges is that of obstruction of an official proceeding. However, this charge faces a possibility of being dismissed by the Supreme Court as their decision anticipated by June could affect Lang, as well as nearly 300 other January Sixer defendants and former President Donald Trump.

The crime can see the defendant serve a maximum of 20 years in prison, if convicted.

In addition to the obstruction charge, he has been accused of fighting with police for about two hours with his fists, feet, a baseball bat and a shield. Social media saw his presence on the day, with multiple instances of Lang posting photos of himself along with words such as “give me liberty or give me death.”

According to an Associated Press review of court records, at least 152 people have been convicted at trial or pleaded guilty to obstructing an official proceeding and at least 108 of them have been sentenced. Lang’s time spent in jail for January-6-related charges ranks as one of the lengthiest. However, some who were facing similar charges have since been fully acquitted.

In reports, the defendant noted his actions taken in opposition to Capitol Police were a a means of responding to the violence perpetrated by law enforcement.

Lang, arrested on January 16, 2002, has now been behind bars exactly 1,095 days.

May 8, 2024: Lohud posted: “Rally planned at Brooklyn prison for NY man held since 2021 on Jan. 6 cop-assault charges” It was written by Chris McKenna.

Supporters of Capitol riot defendant Jake Lang plan to rally outside a Brooklyn prison on Wednesday to protest his being held there in solitary confinement and his nearly 40 months behind bars while awaiting trial.

The 28-year-old New Yorker faces serious charges for allegedly battling police for more than two hours in the midst of a pro-Trump mob at the U.S. Capitol, including his beating officers with a baseball bat. He has been held primarily in the Washington, D.C., jail since his arrest in January 2021, but he has been moved to other facilities a dozen times and says he was placed in the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn around March 1.

The noon rally for the Sullivan County native will be led by his father, Ned Lang of Narrowsburg, and it could be an unusual urban spectacle. At least one horseback rider is expected to take part: Couy Griffin, founder of “Cowboys for Trump” and a former county commissioner from New Mexico who served two weeks in jail for his own Jan. 6 conviction on a trespassing charge.

The younger Lang — referent in court papers by his full name, Edward Jacob Lang — told the USA Today Network in a phone call from prison on Tuesday that he had been kept in solitary confinement since April 9 and leaves his cell only for an hour a day on certain days. He said he has no books, no access to the outside world — other than the phone line for attorney calls that he was using — and leads a “purgatory, sensory-deprivation-like existence.”

Lang, who has given a flood if interviews and conducted his own podcast and other media ventures while locked up, claimed the prison was punishing him for calling a protest during a TV interview with right-wing commentator Lou Dobbs. He said he’s awaiting a disciplinary hearing on a charge of “criminal phone abuse.”

“Basically, they’re trying to stifle my First Amendment,” he told the USA Today Network- New York.

When asked about those claims, a spokesperson for the Federal Bureau of Prisons said e couldn’t comment on how particular inmates are being held, but denied any are kept in solitary confinement. He said some are placed in “restrictive housing,” where they are “continuously monitored and reviewed to ensure that continued placement is necessary, including being seen by Medical and Mental Health employees daily.”

“We make every effort to ensure the physical safety and health of the individuals confined to our facilities through a controlled environment that is secure and humane,” spokesman Scott Taylor said.

Lang originally was set to stand trial in January 2023, which was then proposed for October of that year. But his trial is now on hold until this September — at his own behest — to await a Supreme Court ruling on his bid to dismiss one of the 11 charges against him: obstructing an official proceeding. That and a similar challenge brought by another Jan. 6 defendant were argued before the court last month and could be decided by the end of his term in June.

The judge hearing Lang’s case has refused to release him on bail before his trial, citing violent threats that Lang allegedly made after the riot among a litany of reasons to keep him in jail. Lang’s attorney has renewed the request to release him and took a fresh approach in April by filing a writ of habeas corpus as well.

Prosecutors continue to oppose Lang’s release and suggest that he shares blame for his prolonged pretrial detention. In a recent court filing, they pointed out that he insisted on postponing his trial when it was set for last October because of the pending Supreme Court case.

Lang, in Tuesday’s interview, suggested his continued confinement was a “human rights issue” that both Democrats and Republicans should abhor. Only religious conviction has helped him endure his current conditions in the Brooklyn prison, he said.

“Faith has been a shield for me,” he said.


A one-man army of hate

June 21, 2023: A federal judge sentenced a California man who drove a stun gun into the base of former DC Police Officer Mike Fanone’s neck during the Jan. 6 riot to more than 12 years in prison on Wednesday, calling hime one of the “most serious offenders” from that day.

Daniel Rodriguez, 39, of Panorama City, California, pleaded guilty in February to four felony counts of conspiracy, obstruction of an official proceeding, tampering with documents and inflicting bodily injury on an offers with a dangerous weapon.

On Wednesday, he appeared before U.S. District Judge Amy B. Jackson for sentencing. Prosecutors asked for 14 years in prison — arguing he brought a group of people to D.C., with weapons on Jan. 6 for what he expected to be a violent conflict. Rodriguez’s public defenders asked for a much lower sentence of six years in prison. Jackson quickly made clear that request wouldn’t hold water.

“Your messages were all blood, war, weapons, hanging,” Jackson said. “You never even anticipated a peaceful gathering.”

Jackson previously sentence two other men in connection with the brutal assault on Fanone, during which he lost consciousness and suffered a heart attack. Albuquerque Cosper Head, the Tennessee construction worker who grabbed Fanone in the Lower West Terrace Tunnel and dragged him into the mob, was sentenced to more than seven years in prison.

A month later, Kyle Young, an Iowa man who helped restrain Fanone during the assault — and also handed Rodriguez the stun gun he used on Fanone — also received more than seven years in prison.

On Wednesday, Jackson ordered Rodriguez, who repeatedly drove the stun gun into Fanone’s neck while others were holding him down — leaving permeant scars — to serve 151 months, or approximately 12.5 years, in prison. She also ordered him to pay $96,937 in restitution to the DC Police Department to cover Fanone’s hospital bills and medical leave.

“[Rodriguez] was a one-man army of hate, attacking police officers and destroying property,” Jackson said.

Rodriguez gave a lengthy statement before his sentencing Wednesday. He spoke in great detail about his childhood growing up in L.A. and his single mother’s struggle to provide for him, but expressed little if any remorse for his actions on Jan. 6. He mentioned Fanone only once.

“I hope Officer Fanone will be OK one day,” he said. “It sounds like he’s still in a great deal of pain.”

Rodriguez spent more time talking about the community of fellow supporters of former President Donald Trump he met at rallies before and after the 2020 election, and what he expected to find in D.C.

“By the time of Jan 6 I had been to so many protests and rallies I really thought a civil war was coming,” Rodriguez said. “I thought President Trump was going to stay in power and his supporters were going to protect D.C.”

Rodriguez showed little reaction to the lengthy sentence he received — one of the longest handed down yet in a Capitol riot case. Afterwards he smiled and hugged his attorneys and, while being led out of the courtroom by U.S. Marshals, yelled emphatically, “Trump won!”

Fanone, who spoke at the hearing and urged the Justice Department to prosecute Trump for his role in the riot, told reporters outside the courtroom he wasn’t surprised to hear little remorse from Rodriguez.

“I think this is becoming the rule, rather than the exception, of defendant feigning responsibility or acceptance,” he said. “These are zealots.”

He said the sentencing, the third time he’s had to give a victim impact statement in connection with his assault, had little impact on how he feels about Jan. 6.

“I’m still holding out hope that I’ll be reliving a victim impact statement at the conclusion of Donald Trump’s trial,” Fanone said.

‘Not Just a Follower’

After former President Donald Trump’s loss in the 2020 election, prosecutors said Rodriguez began planning for “revolution” in a Telegram group chat he administered titled “PATRIOTS MAGA Gang.” The group included Rodriguez’s co-defendant Edward Badalian who was convicted in a bench trial in April of felony counts of conspiracy and obstruction of an official proceeding. Rodriguez used the chat, prosecutors said, to urge others to prepare for violence to keep Trump in power.

“The reason for this violent rhetoric and extensive planning was clear: Rodriguez believed the 2020 Presidential election had been stolen, and those responsible should be in prison or dead,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Kimberly Paschall wrote in her sentencing memo. “And this mistaken belief gave him the authority, in his mind, to plan an assault on anyone who stood in his way.”

Paschall said Rodriguez’s commitment to the cause was clear in hundreds of messages he wrote in the group, including one on Dec. 14, 2020 — the day the electors meet in all 50 states and cast their votes for president.

“We won’t allow criminals to run this country anymore,” Rodriguez wrote. “1776 Forever! If it’s the last thing some of us ever do.”

In another message, Rodriguez wrote, “Congress can hang. Please let us get these people dear God.”

Rodriguez ultimately traveled to D.C. on Jan. 6 with a group of people he had encouraged to bring weapons — including knives, bear spray, and ax handles. He then made his way to the front lines on the west side of the Capitol where rioters were attacking badly outnumbered police. At the Lower West Terrace Tunnel, Rodriguez showed a long wooden pole at the police line. It was there when Young handed Rodriguez the stun gun and showed him how to use it. A short time later, Rodriguez used the stun gun on Fanone.

“With his electroshock weapon in hand, Rodriguez reached his arm towards the side of Officer Fanone’s neck, landing the device on the side of Officer Fanone’s neck, below the left ear of Officer Fanone’s helmet,” Paschall wrote. “Officer Fanone screamed in pain, and pulled his face away from Rodriguez briefly. Despite Officer Fanone’s efforts to get away, Rodriguez struck again, placing the electroshock weapon on the back of Officer Fanone’s neck, below the ‘M’ of the ‘MPDC’ logo on his helmet. The electrical spark of the weapon rang out … and Officer Fanone screamed again.”

Fanone, who testified before the January 6th Committee that he believed he was going to die during the assault, spoke during Young’s sentencing hearing in September about the assault’s lingering effects on him.

“The assault on me … cost me my career,” Fanone said. “It cause me my faith in law enforcement and many of the institutions I spent two decades of my life serving.”

After the assault on Fanone, and while still in the grounds of the Capitol, Rodriguez wrote to his Telegram group and bragged about what he’d done.

“I did so much f***ing s***rn and got away tell you later,” he wrote, adding “Tazzzzed the f*** out of the blue.”

In their sentencing memo, Rodriguez’s attorney said he had been preyed on by the former president’s “incendiary lies.” Like the rioters, they said, Rodriguez — who grew up without a father, — ‘deeply respected and idolized Trump.”

“He saw the former president as the father he wished he had,” “Rodriguez’s attorneys wrote.

Rodriguez’s attorneys, assistant federal public defenders Rebecca A. Levy, Margaret W. Ambrose, and Katherine Tanaka said Rodriguez found meaning and community in Trump’s MAGA movement that he hadn’t before had in his life. Rodriguez, in fact, “trusted Trump blindly” and admired him so much that he referred to him as “dad” in his social media chats.

“Dad’s big day,” Rodriguez wrote in one message about Jan. 6. “Gotta get ready to save America.”

Rodriguez’s attorneys also quoted Fannie, who wrote in his book, “Hold the Line,” that Rodriguez was “so desperate for a sense of belonging that he became an easy mark for a cult.”

Despite Rodriguez’s attorneys depiction of him, and even Fanone’s own description, on Wednesday, Judge Jackson pushed back against the idea that Rodriguez was somehow “compelled” by Trump’s words. She said he’d made his decisions willingly.

“As you read these messages, you can’t escape this conclusion that Mr. Rodriguez is not just a follower,” she said.

Rodriguez’s 12.5-year sentence places him among the most serious offenders to date from Jan. 6….

June 21, 2023: The Associated Press reported: “Capitol rioter who shocked police officer with stun gun is sentenced to 12 years in prison”

A California man who drove a stun gun into a police officer’s neck during the most violent clashes of the U.S. Capitol riot was sentenced on Wednesday to more than 12 years in prison.

Daniel “D.J.” Rodriguez yelled, “Trump won!” as he was led out of the courtroom where U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson sentenced him to 12 years and seven months behind bars for his role in the Jan. 6 2021 attack. Only two other Jan. 6 defendants have received longer prison terms so far after hundreds of sentencings for Capitol riot cases.

The judge said Rodriguez, 40, was “a one-man army of hate, attacking police and destroying property” at the Capitol.

“You showed up in (Washington) D.C. spoiling for a fight,” Jackson said. “You can’t blame what you did once you got there on anyone but yourself.”

Metropolitan Police Officer Michael Fanone’s body camera captured him screaming out in pain after Rodriguez shocked him with a stun gun while he was surrounded by a mob.

Another rioter had dragged Fanone into the crowd outside a tunnel on the Capitol’s Lower West Terrace, where a line of police officers were guarding an entrance to the building. Other rioters began beating Fanone, who lost consciousness and suffered a heart attack after Rodriguez pressed the stun gun against his neck and repeatedly shocked him.

Fanone addressed the judge before she imposed the sentence. The former officer described how the Jan. 6 attack prematurely ended his law-enforcement career and turned him into a target for Donald Trump supporters who cling to the lie that Democrats stole the 2020 election from the Republican incumbent.

Fanone left the courtroom in the middle of Rodriguez’s statement to the judge. He didn’t miss an apology from Rodriguez, who had been jailed for more than two years and will get credit for that time already served.

“I’m hopeful that Michael Fanone will be okay some day,” Rodriguez said. “It sounds like he’s in a great deal of pain.”

Fanone left the courtroom because he didn’t care to hear his assailant’ “rambling, incoherent” statement.

“Nothing he could have said to me today would have made any difference whatsoever,” he said.

Prosecutors recommended a 14-year prison sentence for Rodriguez, who pleaded guilty in February to charges including assaulting Fanone. They also sought a fine of nearly $100,000 to offset the cost of Fanone’s medical bills and medical leave.

Fanone’s injuries ultimately ended his career in law enforcement. He has written a book about his Jan. 6 experience and testified in front of a House committee that investigated the insurrection, which disrupted the joint session of Congress for certifying President Joe Biden’s 2020 electoral victory.

“Rodriguez’s criminal conduct on January 6 was the epitome of disrespect for the law; he battled with law enforcement at the U.S. Capitol for hours, nearly costing one officer his life, in order to stop the official proceeding happening inside,” prosecutors wrote in a court filing.

Rodriguez pleaded guilty to four felony charges, including conspiracy and assaulting a law enforcement officer with a deadly or dangerous weapon. He entered the guilty plea about two weeks before his trial was schedule to start in Washington, D.C.

On Jan. 6, Rodriguez attended then-President Donald Trump’s “Stop the Steal” rally before joining the mob of rioters who attacked police in the Lower West Terrace tunnel.

“Rodriguez made his way to the front of the line of rioters battling the officers, yelling into his bullhorn at the beleaguered line,” prosecutors wrote.

Rodriguez deployed a fire extinguisher at police officers in the tunnel and shoved a wooden pole at the police line before another rioter, Kyle Young, handed him what appeared to be a stun gun, according to prosecutors.

Fanone was at the front of the police line when the rioter, Albuquerque Cosper Head, wrapped his arm around the officers neck and dragged him out onto the terrace steps, then restrained Fanone while other rioters attacked him. Rodriguez shocked Fanone’s neck with the stun gun, below the left ear of his police helmet.

Fanone managed to retreat and collapsed behind the police line before he was taken to hospital.

“Once inside, when officers were able to revive him after 2 minutes and 21 seconds, the first thing Officer Fanone asked was “did we take that back that door?” prosecutors wrote.

Rodriguez entered the building and smashed a window with a wooden pole before leaving the Capitol grounds.

Young was also sentenced to more than seven years in prison for his role in the officer’s assault. Young grabbed Fanone by the wrist while others yelled, “Kill him!” and “Get his gun!”

During an interview with FBI agents after his March 2021 arrest, Rodriguez said had believed that he was doing the “right thing” on Jan. 6 and that he had been prepared to die to “save the country.” He cried as he spoke to the agents, saying he was “stupid” and ashamed of his actions.

In the days leading up to Jan. 6, Rodriguez spewed violent rhetoric in a Telegram group chat called “PATRIOTS 45 MAGA Gang.”

“There will be blood. Welcome to the revolution,” Rodriguez wrote a day before the riot.

Rodriguez’s attorneys said he idolized Trump, seeing the former president “as the father he wished he had.”

“Mr. Rodriguez trusted Trump blindly and admired Trump so much that he referred to him as ‘dad’ in his social media chats leading up to Jan. 6th, defense attorneys wrote, seeking a prison sentence of five years and five months for their client.

The same judge who sentenced Rodriguez also convicted a co-defendant, Edward Badalian, of three riot-related charges and acquitted him of a fourth after a trial without a jury. Jackson is scheduled to sentence Badalian on July 21.

More than 1,000 people have been charged with federal crimes related to the Jan.6 riot. Over 700 of them have pleaded guilty or been convicted after trials. And approximately 550 of them have been sentenced, with over half receiving terms of imprisonment ranging from seven days to 18 years.


Rioter who dragged Officer Fanone into mob sentenced to 7.5 years in prison

October 27, 2022: WUSA9 reported: The Tennessee man who dragged former DC Police Officer Michael Fanone into the mob on Jan. 6 was sentenced Thursday to more than seven years in prison for initiating one of the most violent assaults on law enforcement that day.

Albuquerque Copper Head, a construction worker from Johnson City, Tennessee, pleaded guilty in May to one felony count of assaulting police. Head was one of a number of men charged in the connection with the brutal assault on Fanone — among them his co-defendant Kyle Young, who pleaded guilty ti the same count and was sentenced last month to seven years in prison.

In a sentencing memo filed Wednesday, the Justice Department asked for Head to serve 96 months in prison, which is the maximum allowed by statute. Prosecutors said a longer sentence for Head was unwarranted because of his lengthy criminal history, which includes 45 prior arrests and multiple conviction for domestic violence, and his role in initiating the assault on Fanone. Head also claimed to police after his arrest that he had been trapped in the Lower West Terrace Tunnel by the crowd.

“This claim is flatly contradicted by video evidence depicting his willful and persistent participation in some of the most barbaric violence on January 6,” assistant U.S. attorneys Cara Gardner and Kimberly Paschall wrote in their memo.

According to the memo, Head joined in the mob’s assault on police in the tunnel and used a stolen riot shield to strike toward officers. When he lost control of the shield and rioters were pushed out of the tunnel, Head wrapped his arm around the neck of Fanone — who was on the front line — and yelled “I’ve got on!” as he dragged him into the mob.

“Head continued to restrain Officer Fanone while another rioter applied a taser to the base of the officer’s skull. Head only let go when Officer Fanone reacted with enough force to free himself from Head’s grip,” prosecutors wrote. “Although Head was separated from Officer Fanone in the moments that followed, Head would have been able to hear the sound of the taser being activated again, Officer Fanone’s screams of agony, and the yells from another rioter to “Kill him with his own gun!”

Head forced his way back through the crowd as a group of rioters began to surround the officer to protect him from his attackers. Undeterred, Head reached toward Officer Fanone repeatedly, grabbing the officer and trying to regain control until one of Fanone’s protectors forcibly pushed Head away.”

At the sentencing hearing Thursday, U.S. District Judge Amy B. Jackson acknowledged Head’s acceptance of responsibility in the case and the letters she received from his fiancée and sister about how his family, including his young children, have suffered in his absence. She also gave him credit for achieving sobriety seven years ago. But, she rejected the defense’s characterization that Head and Fanone had gotten “entangled” and attorney Nicholas Wallace’s argument that Head wasn’t responsible for the continued attacks on Fanone after he escaped his restraint.

“He was your prey,” Jackson told Head. “He was your trophy.”

Jackson, who also sentenced Head’s co-defendant Young, as one of the most serious cases on her docket and said he was “instrumental” in one of the most violent assaults on police on Jan. 6. She also said there remained an ongoing need to deter others from engaging in the same kind of political violence as Head.

“People need to understand they can’t do this or anything like this again,” she said. “They can’t force their will on the American people when they’ve already spoken at the ballot box. That’s the opposite of democracy That’s tyranny.”

Jackson ordered Head to serve 90 months in prison (7.5 years) to be followed by 36 months of supervised release. He will receive credit for the approximately 18 months he’s spent in pretrial detention since his arrest. Head will also have pay $2,000 in restitution to the Architect of the Capitol and an additional amount of restitution to Fanone to be decided at a later date.

Jackson agreed to recommend Head be placed at the federal correctional facility in Butner, North Carolina, so he can be closer to his family in Tennessee. Wallace also asked for Head to be recommended for the Bureau of Prison’s RDAP (Residential Drug Abuse Program), course, although as a convicted violent offender he would not be eligible for a sentence reduction upon completion.

Head’s sentence is one of the longest to date in a Capitol riot case, second only to former NYPD officer Thomas Webster, who was ordered to serve 10 years in prison for assaulting a DC Police officer on Jan. 6.

October 27, 2022: Law & Crime reported: ‘He was your Prey’: Judge deals 7.5-Year Sentence to U.S. Capitol Rioter Who Delivered Officer Michael Fanone by his Neck to a Violent Mob.”

A U.S. Capitol rioter who dragged Metropolitan Police Officer Michael Fanone to a violent horde after pretending to help him will spend the next 7.5 years behind bars, a federal judge ruled on Thursday.

“He was your prey,” declared U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson before she pronounced the sentence. “He was your trophy.”

Tennessee resident Albuquererque Cosper Head was one of the defendants charged on a three-person indictment relating to Fanone’s brutal assault, but as noted by the judge, Head served as the catalyst for the attack. Rioters beat, Tasered and robbed Fanone of his radio and his badge. In his congressional testimony, Fanone recounted hearing one shout “Kill him with his own gun!” and trying to quell the mob by shouting “I have kids.”

As recounted by Jackson, Head’s violence on Jan. 6 did not start with Fanone, and he engaged in “hand-to-hand combat” with a line of officers protecting the doors at the Capitol tunnel — a melee described as a “brutal, two-hour Medieval battle.” Throngs of rioters tried to break into the building by attempting push through an “under-manned, exhausted, ad hoc police line,” the judge noted.

Video showed Head using a police shield as a weapon and trying to jockey to the front of the line.

After reaching Fanone, Head could be heard boasting, “Hey, I’ve got one” and was quoting telling him “Hey, I’m going to try to help you out here. You hear me?”

Fanone was heard responding: “Thank you,” seemingly unaware of the group attack that awaited him.

In a 21-page sentencing memo, Head’s attorney, Nicholas Wallace described his client’s interactions with Fanone as getting “entangled” with the officer. The judge bristled at the euphemism.

“C’mon,” Jackson scoffed, comparing entanglement to what happens to the leashes of two dogs. “You cannot minimize what happened by using less objectionable verbs.”

The defense sentencing memo emphasized the entire interaction lasted some 35 seconds, but Jackson countered that the life-changing events for Fanone counted more than the ticks of a clock. Not all of the Jan. 6th rioters were bloodthirsty, but some were, the judge noted.

She added that Head, at that moment, was not drawing distinctions.

Inside the court, and weeping at the pronouncement of the verdict, was Head’s fiancée. She and other loved ones of the defendant poured in letters to the court emphasizing Head’s overcoming addictions — to alcohol, Oxycontin and methamphetamine. Now the father of two daughters, Head became clean after a string of mostly minor offenses and a felony that predated the Jan. 6 attack. As even his defense counsel acknowledged, those crimes added up. Prosecutors counted roughy 45 prior arrests, but his family attested to Head’s seeming transformation — that is, before the attack on the Capitol.

Speaking of his letters of support, the judge noted: “They are raw. They are honest. They are true.”

She quoted a passage from the fiancée’s as saying: “It’s the women who will suffer,” noting the difficulties of raising children with the father in jail.

Yet Jackson countered that she could not overlook the suffering felt by the family of Head’s victim, whom she noted was ironically attacked under a “Blue Lives Matter” flag.

“He was protecting the very essence of democracy,” Jackson said. “He was protecting America.”

Fanone, watching the proceedings in the courtroom, sat at wide attention during the judges address. He spoke in court of his own reflections of that day before the sentence was delivered. He then left the courtroom without comment, putting on dark sunglasses and taking no questions from reporters. He is now a CNN on-air contributor.

October 17, 2022: CNN Politics reported: “Man who pulled officer Fanone into mob during US Capitol attack sentenced to over 7 years”

The man who pulled former Washington, D.C. Metropolitan Police officer Michael Fanone into the crowd of violent rioters on January 6, 2021, yelling “I got one!” was sentenced Thursday to 90 months behind bars.

In the lower west terrace tunnel, a small entryway into the Capitol, the mob found police with chemical spray, poles, bats and officers’ own batons and shields against the line of police — including Fanone – protecting the building and those inside.

It was during this battle that a man named Alburqueque Head pulled Fanone away from his fellow officers, wrapping his arm around Fanone’s neck, tearing him into the crowd, according to court documents, which consumed Fanone and beat him unconscious.

“These were some of the darkest acts on one of (our) darkest days,” district Judge Amy Berman Jackson said before handing down the sentence Thursday.

“He was your prey, he was your trophy,” she said of Fanone, adding later that the officer “was protecting American” that day.

Head, of Kingsport, Tennessee, pleaded guilty in May to assaulting a police officer and has been detained since April 2021.

During the hearing, prosecutors played video from Fanone’s body-worn camera on January 6, which showed Head initially tell Fanone, “I’m going to get you out of here.”

“Thank you,” Fanone replied.

Fanone testified during the sentencing that at first he believed Head was trying to help him. Seconds later, however, Head yelled “I got on!” to the mob.

Fanone testified he felt Head “choke me and drag me out into the vicious crowd,” holding onto Fanone as another rioter tased him. The officer suffered a heart attack as rioters beat him and tased him in his neck repeatedly, Fanone said.

“Show Mr. Head the same mercy he showed me on January 6,’ Fanone told the judge Thursday. “None.”

The footage also showed Fanone’s first words when he regained consciousness as officers carried him inside the Capitol. “We took the door back?” he asked fellow officers.

Fanone is now a CNN contributor.

Head chose not to speak during Thursday’s hearing.

“Head appears before this Honorable Court as a 43-year-old seeking redemption and mercy,” his defense attorney, Nicholas Wallace, wrote in a sentencing memorandum, noting that his father had passed away while he was in prison and his mother is in “declining health.”

Head’s attorney also blamed his clients length rap sheet on a former addition to opioids and other drugs, saying that his crimes came to a “screeching halt” after he became sober several years ago.

Head’s fiancé and mother of his two daughters was at the sentencing Thursday and wrote a letter to the judge on Head’s behalf, which Jackson called “raw” and “true.”

Jackson, reading from the letter, noted, “it’s the women who will suffer.”

Fanone told CNN’s Anderson Cooper on “Anderson Cooper 360” Thursday that he thought the punishment was appropriate and that Jackson was “thoughtful in her sentencing,” but aded that the long sentences handed to some convicted January 6 defendants may be “inspiring” some Americans to “fight harder and be more violent.”

Asked if he believed the long sentences have “a deterrent effect on potential or future attacks, Fanone said, “I would traditionally say yes, but these are not traditional crimes. These are politically inspired attacks on law enforcement and on our democracy.”

“Unfortunately, you still have individuals, a former president, many of his allies, that continue to expose the same lies that motivated these attacks,” Fanone added. “So while I think that [long sentences] may prevent many Americans from participating in something similar to January 6, I think it’s also inspiring many Americans to fight harder and to be more violent.”


Trump Lawsuits 0 comments on Insurrectionists Are Facing Consequences – Part 5

Insurrectionists Are Facing Consequences – Part 5

A wooden gavel rests on a marble desk next to a round circle by Tingey Law firm on Unsplash

Those who attacked their own nation’s Capitol failed to consider the consequences of doing so. This is part 5.

On January 6, 2021, a mob of Donald Trump supporters staged an insurrection at the U.S. Capitol building. The Guardian reported that people stormed the chambers of the House and Senate while the Electoral College votes were being tallied.


January 13, 2022: Department of Justice U.S. Department of Affairs – U.S. Department of Justice posted a press release titled: “Leader of Oath Keepers and 10 Other Individuals Indicted In Federal Court for Seditious Conspiracy and Other Offenses Related to U.S. Capitol Breach.”

Eight Others Facing Charges In Two Related Cases

A federal grand jury in the District of Columbia returned an indictment yesterday, which was unsealed today, charging 11 defendants with seditious conspiracy and other charges for crimes related to the breach of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, which disturbed a joint session of the U.S. Congress that was in the process of ascertaining and counting the electoral votes related to the presidential election.

According to court documents, Elmer Stewart Rhodes III, 56, of Granbury, Texas, who is the founder and leader of the Oath Keepers; and Edward Vallejo, 63, of Phoenix, Arizona, are being charged for the first time in connection with events leading up to and including Jan. 6. Rhodes was arrested this morning in Little Elm, Texas, and Vallejo was arrested this morning in Phoenix.

In addition to Rhodes and Vallejo, those named in the indictment include nine previously charged defendants: Thomas Caldwell, 67, of Berryville, Virginia; Joseph Hackett, 51, of Sarasota, Florida; Kenneth Harrelson, 41, of Titusville, Florida; Joshua James, 34, of Arab, Alabama; Kelly Meggs, 52, of Dunnellon, Florida; Roberto Minuta, 37, of Prosper, Texas; David Moerschel, 44, of Punta Gorda, Florida; Brian Ulrich, 44, of Guyton Georgia an Jessica Watkins, 39, of Woodstock, Ohio.

In addition to earlier charges filed against them, they now face additional counts for seditious conspiracy and other offenses.

Eight other individuals affiliated with the Oath Keepers, all previously charged in the investigation, remain as defendants in two related cases. The superseding indictment has now effectively been split into three parts: the 11-defendant seditious conspiracy case, a seven-defendant original case, and a third case against one of the previously charged defendants.

In one of the related cases, the original superseding indictment, charges remain pending against James Beeks, 49, of Orlando, Florida; Donovan Crowl, 51, of Cable, Ohio; William Issacs, 22, of Kissimmee, Florida; Connie Meggs, 60, of Dunnellon, Florida; and Laura Steele, 53, of Thomasville, North Carolina. The other case charges Jonathan Walden, 57, of Birmingham, Alabama.

The three indictments collectively charge all 19 defendants with corruptly obstructing an official proceeding. Eighteen of the 19 defendants — the exception is Walden — are charged with seditious conspiracy. Some of the defendants are also facing other related charges.

As alleged in the indictments, the Oath Keepers are a large body but loosely organized collection of individuals, some of whom are associated with militias. Though the Oath Keepers will accept anyone as members, they explicitly focus on recruiting current and former military, law enforcement, and first-responder personnel. Members and affiliates of the Oath Keepers were among the individuals and groups who forcibly entered the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

The seditious conspiracy indictment alleges that, following the Nov. 3, 2020, presidential election, Rhodes conspired with his co-defendants and others to oppose by force the execution of the laws governing the transfer of presidential power by Jan. 20, 2021.

Beginning in late December 2020, via encrypted and private communications applications, Rhodes and various co-conspirators coordinated and planned to travel to Washington, D.C., on or around Jan. 6, 2021, the date of the certification of the electoral college vote, the indictment alleges. Rhodes and several co-conspirators made plans to bring weapons to the area to support the operation. The co-conspirators then traveled across the country to Washington. D.C., metropolitan area in early January 2021.

According to the seditious conspiracy indictment, the defendants conspired through a variety of manners and means, including: organizing into teams that were prepared and willing to use force and to transport firearms and ammunition into Washington D.C.; recruiting members and affiliates to participate in the conspiracy; organizing trainings to teach and learn paramilitary combat tactics; bringing and contributing paramilitary gear, weapons and supplies — including knives, batons, camouflaged combat uniforms, tactical vests with plates, helmets, eye protection and radio equipment — to the Capitol grounds; breaching and attempting to take control of the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021; continuing to plot, after Jan. 6, 2021, to oppose by force the lawful transfer of presidential power, and using websites, social media, text messaging and encrypted messaging applications to communicate with co-conspirators and others.

On Jan. 6, 2021, a large crowd began to gather outside the Capitol perimeter as the Joint Session of Congress got underway at 1 p.m. Crowd members eventually forced their way through, up and over U.S. Capitol Police barricades and advanced to the building’s exterior façade. 

Shortly after 2 p.m., crowd members forced entry into the Capitol by breaking windows, ramming open doors, and assaulting Capitol police and other law enforcement officers. At about this time, according to the indictment, Rhodes entered the restricted area of the Capitol grounds and directed his followers to meet him at the Capitol.

At approximately 2:30 p.m., as detailed in the indictment, Hackett, Harrelson, Meggs, Moerschel and Watkins, and other Oath Keepers and affiliates — many wearing paramilitary clothing and patches with the Oath Keepers name, logo, and insignia — marched in a “stack” formation up the east steps of the Capitol, joined a mob, and made their way into the Capitol.

Later, another group of Oath Keepers and associates, including James, Minuta, and Ulrich, formed a second “stack” and breached the Capitol grounds, marching from the west side to the east side of the Capitol building and up the east stairs and into the building.

While certain Oath Keepers members and affiliates breached the Capitol grounds and building, others remained stationed just outside of the city in quick reaction force (QRF) teams. According to the indictment, the QRF teams were prepared to rapidly transport firearms and other weapons into Washington, D.C., in support of operations aimed at using force to stop the lawful transfer of presidential power. The indictment alleges that the teams were coordinated, in part, by Caldwell and Vallejo.

The charge of conspiracy carries a statutory maximum penalty of 20 years in prison. A federal district court judge will determine any sentence after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.

The case is being prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia and the Department of Justice National Security Division’s Counterterrorism Section. Valuable assistance was provided by U.S. Attorney’s Offices in the Northern District of Texas and the District of Arizona.

The case is being investigated by the FBI’s Washington Field Office with valuable assistance provided by the FBI’s Dallas and Phoenix Field Offices. These charts are the result of significant cooperation between agents and staff across numerous FBI Field Offices, including those in Florida, North Carolina, Ohio, Texas, Arizona, Alabama, and Georgia, among other locations.

In the one year since Jan. 6, more than 725 individuals have been arrested in nearly all 50 states for crimes related to the breach of the U.S. Capitol, including over 225 individuals charged with assaulting or impeding law enforcement. The investigation remains on going.

January 23, 2023: Office of Public Affairs U.S. Department of Justice posted a press release: “Four Oath Keepers Found Guilty of Seditious Conspiracy Related to U.S. Capitol Breach”

Defendants Also Convicted of Related Felony Charges

Four members of the Oath Keepers were found guilty today by a jury in the District of Columbia of seditious conspiracy and other charges for crimes related to the breach of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Their actions and the actions of others disrupted a joint session of the U.S. Congress that was in the process of ascertaining and counting the electoral votes related to the presidential election.

According to the evidence at trial, in the months leading up to January 6, these defendants and their co-conspirators plotted to oppose by force the lawful transfer of presidential power., including by amassing an armed “quick reaction force” on the outskirts of the District of Columbia.

The defendants, Roberto Minuta, 38, of Prosper Texas; Joseph Hackett, 52, of Sarasota Florida; David Moerschel, 45, of Punta Gorda, Florida; and Edward Vallejo, 64, of Phoenix, Arizona, — were leaders and associates of the Oath Keepers organization.

In addition to the seditious conspiracy count, all four were found guilty of conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, obstruction of an official proceeding, and conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, and conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, and conspiracy to prevent Members of Congress from discharging their official duties. Hackett was also found guilty of destruction of evidence.

“Today, the Justice Department secured the conviction of four members of the Oath Keepers for their criminal conduct surrounding the Jan. 6. 2021 attack on the Capitol,” said U.S. Attorney General Merrick B. Garland. “A jury found all four defendants guilty of seditious conspiracy, as well as conspiracies to obstruct the certification of the electoral college vote and to prevent members of Congress from discharging their duties. I am grateful to the prosecutors, agents, and staff for their excellent work on this case.”

“Today’s verdict is an important step in our continued efforts to hold criminally accountable those involved in the breach of the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021,” said FBI Director Christopher Wray. “We will continue to investigate those who sought to undermine the workings of American democracy and we will work closely with federal prosecutors to ensure justice is served.”

“For the second time in recent months, a jury has found that a group of Americans entered into a seditious conspiracy against the United States,” said U.S. Attorney Matthew M. Graves for the District of Columbia. “The goal of this conspiracy was to prevent the execution of our laws that govern the peaceful transfer of power — striking at the very heart of our democracy. We are grateful to the thoughtful, deliberative work of this jury who gave weeks of their lives to carefully consider and deliver justice in this case and in doing so reaffirmed our democratic principles.”

Today’s verdict follows the November 29, 2022, seditious conspiracy conviction of Elmer Steward Rhodes III and Kelly Meggs — two leaders of the Oath Keepers. Jessica Watkins, Kenneth Harrelson and Thomas Caldwell were also convicted of related felony charges in that first trial. All nine defendants were indicted as part of the same conspiracy on Jan. 12, 2022.

Seditious conspiracy, conspiracy to obstruct Congress, obstruction of Congress, and destruction of evidence all carry a statutory maximum sentence of 20 years in prison. All charges cary potential financial penalties. The court will determine any sentence after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors. U.S. District Court Judge Amir Mehta will schedule sentencing hearings at a later date.

According to the government’s evidence, following the Nov. 3, 2020, presidential election, the defendants conspired together and with others to oppose by force the execution of the laws governing the transfer of presidential power by Jan. 20, 2021.

Beginning in late December 2020, via encrypted and private communications applications, the defendants and various co-conspirators coordinated and planned to travel to Washington, D.C., on or around Jan. 6, 2021, the date of the certification pf tej electoral college vote.

The defendants made plans to bring weapons to the area to support the operation. The co-conspirators then traveled across the country to the Washington, D.C., metropolitan area in early January 2021, with paramilitary gear and supplies including firearms, tactical vests with plates, helmets, and radio equipment.

The defendants conspired through a variety of manners and means, including: organizing into teams that were prepared and willing to use force and to transport firearms and ammunition into Washington, D.C.; recruiting members and affiliates to participate in the conspiracy, organizing training to teach and learn paramilitary combat tactics; bringing and contributing paramilitary gear, weapons, and supplies — including knives, camouflaged combat uniforms, tactical vests with plates, helmets, eye protection, and radio equipment — to the Capitol grounds; breaching and attempting to take control of the Capitol grounds and building on Jan. 6, 2021; continuing to plot, after Jan 6, 2021, to oppose by force the lawful transfer of presidential power; and using websites, social media, text messaging and encrypted messaging application to communicate with co-conspirator and others.

The case is being prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia and the Department of Justice’s National Security Division and Criminal Division. Valuable assistance was provided by numerous U.S. Attorney’s Office across the country.

The case is being investigated by the FBI’s Washington Field Office, as well as the Metropolitan Police Department, with significant assistance provided by the FBI’s New York, Dallas, Tampa and Phoenix Field Offices. Valuable assistance was provided by the U.S. Capitol Police and the U.S. Secret Service.

In the 24 months since Jan. 6. 2021, more than 950 individuals have been arrested in nearly all 50 states for crimes related to the breach of the U.S. Capitol, including 284 individuals charged with assaulting or impeding law enforcement. The investigation remains ongoing.


June 28, 2024: NPR reported “Supreme Court says prosecutors improperly charged some Jan. 6 defendants” It was written by Nina Totenberg.

The U.S. Supreme Court limited which defendants accused of taking part in the Jan. 6. Capitol riot can be charged by federal prosecutors for obstructing Congress. The court’s decision also places at least a cloud of doubt about two of the four felony counts in the election subversion indictment of President Trump.

In an opinion by Chief Justice John Roberts, the court ruled that the government must establish “that the defendant impaired the availability or integrity for use in an official proceeding of records, documents, objects, or other things used in a official proceeding.”

Prosecutors used a key criminal statute to prosecute more than 350 of the most violent participants in the riot.

The stature had two parts. The first part makes is a crime to corruptly alter or Destry documents and records related to an official proceeding. The second part makes it a crime to otherwise obstruct or impede an official proceeding — in this case, the congressional counting of electoral college ballots.

Roberts said the statute was limited to documents and evidence destruction, and that the word otherwise was not meant to broaden the meaning of the law into a catchall provision.

Writing for the court majority, Robert said the statute was limited to documents and evidence destruction, and that the word otherwise was not meant otherwise broaden the meaning of the law as a catchall provision.

In a concurring opinion, liberal justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote: Despite “the shocking circumstances involved in this case,” the “Court’s task is to determine what conduct is proscribe by the criminal statue that has been involved as the base for the obstruction charge at issue here.”

Justices Amy Coney Barrett joined Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan in dissent.

Justice Barrett — a Trump appointee — joined wrote that the provision in question “is a very broad provision, and admittedly, events like January 6th were not its target. (Who could blame Congress for that failure of imagination?) But statutes often go further than the problem that inspired them, and under the rules of statutory interpretation, we stick to the text anyway. The Court, abandoning that approach, does textual backflips to find some way — any way — to narrow” it.

The case was brought by Joseph Fischer, a former police officer in a township near Harrisburg, Pa., who joined the mob on Jan. 6th, even recording a four-minute cell phone video in which he is heard yelling, “charge,” and is seen in a scrum with police officers.

According to prosecutors, Fischer, in text messages, also threatened violence prior to Jan. 6, including sending a text in which he wrote, “take Democratic Congress to the gallows … can’t vote if they can’t breathe lol.” And when the FBI came to arrest him later, he shouted profanities at the agents and at his own police chief, and he sought to conceal the phone he had used to record events at the Capitol.

The Justice Department maintained that it limited the use of the statute at issue in the case by requiring proof that Fischer and other similarly charged defendants had specifically intended to disrupt the counting of the electoral college ballots and by focusing on elements like a defendant’s preparation for violence, and bringing tactical gear or paramilitary equipment to the Capitol.

At an oral argument Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar told the justices that prosecutors have brought charges against some 1400 defendants in connection with the riot, but that only 350 of those had been charged under the obstruction statute because of the need to move intent to disrupt the counting of the ballots.

Defendant Fischer’s lawyer, Jeffrey Green, maintained that the reason the government chose to use the statute at all was that it has a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison. Even though nobody has actually gotten such a stiff penalty, he said, for prosecutors it is “a really big cudgel” to use in plea bargaining with defendants.

Friday’s decision has already had consequences. Pending the outcome of Friday’s case, some judges previously allowed a small number of convicted defendants to be released from prison early. Now, a larger number will have to be repentances, retried, or just released.

But while Friday’s decision might intuitively be seen as a devastating blow to prosectors, a deep dive into the data concludes the effects will be “minimal.” NYU law professor Ryan Goodman is the lead author of the study, published by “Just Security,” which relied on NPR’s detailed data base of Jan 6 Capitol riot cases.

Goodman notes that Trump is different from the Capitol rioters because the obstruction charges against him involve efforts to interfere with the electoral college certificate arriving at the desk to be counted on Jan. 6th, and the use of false elector certificates — all of which would seem to fall under the tampering-with-evidence provision of the obstruction statute.

As for the Jan. 6 rioters, the study found that of the 1417 people charged so far in connection with the Jan. 6 invasion, only 346, or 24 per cent, were charged under the obstruction statute. Of that 346, 128 defendants were convicted by a jury of obstruction and another crime, most often another felony, which would still stand.

A different cohort of 48 people pleaded guilty to the obstruction charge, which now goes away. But hovering over all of this pleas is the fact that the plea agreement uniformly included an important caveat: In the event that the conviction were to be “vacated for any reason,” the government reserved the right to prosecute for other alleged crimes that prosecutors had either agreed not to prosecute or agreed to dismiss at sentencing.

Finally the study, found that until Friday, 71 people were still awaiting trial on the obstruction charge, but more than half are also charged with another felony. While those felonies may not have penalties a severe as the obstruction charge, if the defendants are found guilty of those other crimes, the sentencing judge is permitted to consider the conduct charged in the obstruction case in determine the length of the sentence.

The study’s authors, in addition to professor Goodman, are Georgetown law professor Mary McCord, a long-time federal prosecutor who held a variety of top Justice Department jobs, including chief of the criminal division and acting assistant attorney general for national security; and NYU law professor Andrew Weissmann, also a long-time Justice Department prosecutor, who served as chief of the fraud section, counsel for the FBI, and lead prosecutor in the Muller investigation of then President Trump.

Of course Donald Trump, if re-elected, could pardon all the Jan. 6 defendants. He has not committed to doing that yet, though he often refers to Jan. 6 offenders as “hostages” and “patriots.” In his first term he pardoned friends and political allies who were a lot more prominent, including former campaign chiefs Paul Manafort, convicted on corruption charges, and Stephen Bannon, indicted on fraud charges for a build-the-wall fundraising scheme in which he allegedly pocked $1 million.

In addition Trump pardoned his close friend and advisor Roger Stone, indicted on charges of witness tampering, obstruction, and lying to Congress about what he and then-candidate Trump knew about Russian efforts to discredit Hillary Clinton in terms of 2016 presidential campaign; he pardoned former New York Police Commissioner Bernard Kerik, who pleaded guilty to tax fraud and lying to White House officials; He pardoned Charles Kushner, the father of Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner; the elder Kushner pleaded guilty to 18 criminal counts of tax evasion, witness tampering, and making illegal campaign contributions; and Trump also pardoned his former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn, who twice pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI and then withdrew his guilty pleas.

June 28, 2024: The Associated Press reported: “Supreme Court makes it harder to charge Capitol riot defendants with obstruction, charge Trump faces” It was written by Mark Sherman.

The Supreme Court on Friday limited a federal obstruction law that has been used to change hundreds of Capitol riot defenders as well as former President Trump.

The justices ruled 6-3 that the charge of obstructing an official proceeding, enacted in 2002 in response to the financial scandal that brought down Enron Corp., must include proof that defendants tried to tamper with or destroy documents. Only some of the people who violently attacked the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, fall into that category.

The overwhelming majority of the approximately 1,000 people who have been convicted of or pleaded guilty to Capitol riot-related federal crimes were not charged with obstruction and will not be affected by the outcome.

Still, the decision is likely to be used as fodder for clam by Trump and his Republican allies that the Justice Department has treated the Capitol riot defendants unfairly.

It is unclear how the court’s decision will affect the case against Trump in Washington, which includes charges other than obstruction. Special counsel Jack Smith has said the charges faced by the former president would not be affected.

Trump’s case is on hold while the Supreme Court considers a separate case in which Trump is claiming immunity from prosecution. A decision is expected on Monday.

Under the ruling issued Friday, dozens of defendants could seek new sentences, ask to withdraw guilty pleas, or have charges dropped. Most defendants convicted of obstruction were also convicted of another felony so their sentence may not be significantly impacted — if at all.

The high court returned the case of former Pennsylvania police office Joseph Fischer to a lower court to determine if Fischer could be charged with obstruction. Fischer has been indicted for his role in disrupting Congress’ certification of Democrat Joe Biden’s 2020 presidential election victory over Trump.

Fischer is among about 350 people who have been charged with obstruction. Some pleaded guilty to — or were convicted of — lesser charges.

Republicans, who have cast the Jan. 6 defendants as victims of political persecution, are certain to seize on the ruling to argue the rioters have been unfairly prosecuted by the Justice Department. Trump has embraced Jan. 6 defendants on the campaign trail, and floated pardons for the rioters if he wins in November.

Trump, speaking at a rally in Chesapeake, Virginia, described the decision as a “great thing.”

“Free the J6 hostages now,” he said. “They should free them now for what they’ve gone through. They;e been waiting for this decision for a long time. They’ve been waiting for a long time. And that was a great answer. That is a great thing for people that have been so horribly treated.”

It’s also likely to slow down cases in a court already clogged with Jan. 6 defendants as judges are forced to grapple with how to apply the ruling.

“It’s going to be a big mess,” said Randall Eliason, a professor at George Washington University Law School and former federal prosecutor in Washington.

Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the court’s opinion, joined by conservative Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Clarance Thomas, and by liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, a former federal defender who also wrote a separate opinion.

Reading the obstruction statue broadly “would also criminalize a broad swath of prosaic conduct, exposing activists and lobbyists to decades in prison,” Roberts wrote.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett dissented, along with Justices Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor.

Barrett, one of the three justices appointed by Trump, wrote that the law clearly encompasses the events of Jan. 6. “The riot forced Congress to suspend the proceeding, delaying it for several hours,” she wrote.

She said her colleagues in the majority did “textual backflips to find some way — any way – to narrow the reach” of the obstruction law.

Roberts, Jackson, and Barrett made strikingly different word choices in their opinions. While Roberts described the attack as a “breach of the Capitol,” Barrett described the events as a riot and the participants as rioters. Jackson wrote that “an angry mob stormed the United States Capitol.”

Attorney General Merrick Garland said he was disappointed with the decision, which he said “limits an important federal statute,” Still, Garland said the cases against the “vast majority” of people charged in the attack won’t be affected.

“January 6 was an unprecedented attack on the cornerstone of our system of government — the peaceful transfer of power from one administration to the next,” he said. “We will continue to use all available tools to hold accountable those criminally responsible for the January 6 attack on our democracy.”

Roughly 170 Capitol Insurrection defendants have been convicted of obstructing or conspiring to obstruct the Jan. 6 joint session of Congress, including the leaders of two far-right extremist groups, the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers. A number of defendants have had their sentencings delayed until after the justice rule on the matter.

Some rioter have even won early release from prison while the appeal was pending over concerns that they might end up serving longer than they should have if the Supreme Court ruled against the Justice Department.

They include Kevin Seefried, a Delaware man who threatened a Black police officer with a pole attached to a Confederate battle flag as he stormed the Capitol. Seefried was sentences last year to three years behind bars, but a judge recently ordered that he be released one year into his prison term while awaiting the Supreme Courts ruling.

Seventeen of the 18 trial judges who have weighted in have allowed the charge to stand. Among them, U.S. District Judge Dabney Frederich, a Trump appointee, wrote that “statutes often reach beyond the principal evil that animated them.”

But U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols, another Trump appointed, dismissed the charge against Fischer and two other defendants, writing that prosecutors went too far. A divided panel of the federal appeals court in Washington reinstate d the charge before the Supreme Court agreed to take up the case.

Alito and Thomas rejected calls that they step aside from the Jan. 6 case because of questions raised about their impartiality.

The U.S. attorney’s office in Washington, which has handled Jan. 6 prosecutions, said on one who has been convicted of or charged with obstruction will be completely cleared because of the ruing. Every defendant also has another felony or misdemeanor charges, or both, prosecutors said.

For around 50 people who were convicted, obstruction was the only felony count, prosecutors said. Of those roughly two dozen who are still serving their sentence are most likely to be affected by the ruling.

More than 1,400 people have been charged with Capitol riot-related federal crimes.


February 4, 2021: HuffPost posted “Feds Drop The Hammer On The Capitol Insurrectionists” It was written by Ryan J. Reilly.

The insurrectionists who stormed the U.S. Capitol last month largely escaped arrest after overwhelming an underprepared police force. When the feds eventually tracked some of them down — starting with those who openly bragged about their conduct on social media — most initially faced low-level misdemeanor charges.

But now, after prosecutors presented their cases to a federal jury, many insurrectionists have been charged with much more serious offenses: felonies that come with the potential of significant time in federal prison.

In addition to criminal complaints, the government has secured federal grand jury indictments against a number of defendants, including conspiracy cases against defendants who allegedly worked together during the attack on the Capitol. A number of U.S. Capitol attack defendants have been indicted on serious charges — nearly a dozen on Wednesday alone.

As the indictments come back, it appears as though felony charge are going to be the norm for many defendants. Their online bragging, disclosures during FBI interviews and searches of their property after arrests are giving prosecutors what they need to secure felony indictments.

One common charge is obstruction of an official proceeding and aiding and abetting, in violation of Section 1512(c) of the U.S. Code. While 1512 is better known for its witness-tampering provisions, part of the law outlaws corruptly obstructing, influencing or impeding an official proceeding. The official proceeding in question here is the certification of the Electoral College votes on Jan. 6.

Take the case of the “selfie cops” who used to be employed as law enforcement officers in Virginia. Jacob Fracker and Thomas Robertson were originally only facing two counts. But a federal grand jury indicted them on four counts on Friday, including a felony charge of obstructing a federal proceeding and aiding and abetting others in impeding a proceeding before Congress “by entering and remaining in the United State’s Capitol without authority and participating in disruptive behavior.”

Jenny Cudd, a florist from Texas, bragged on social media about how rioters broke down House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s (D-Calif.) office door and “charged the Capitol.” Cudd said she was proud of her actions. This week — amid a raging coronavirus pandemic that has killed hundreds of thousands of Americans — she requested permission to take a vacation to Mexico. Because she was only facing misdemeanor charges, a court might have granted such a motion.

But a federal grand jury indicted Cudd on five charges on Wednesday, including the obstruction an official proceeding charge. Now that she’s been indicted on a felony, that Mexico vacation is less likely.

Gina Bisignano, a California woman who stormed the Capitol wearing a Louis Vitton sweater and was caught on video egging on the crowd with a bullhorn, was indicted on seven counts, including the obstructing an official proceeding charge. Grand jurors also added a civil disorder charge against Bisignano under a rarely used law first passed in the 1960s that the Trump administration more recently deployed during protests over the killing of George Floyd.

Patrick McCaughey III, caught on video battling police officers struggling to keep the pro-Trump mob from storming the Capitol, was indicted on nine counts, including a charge of assaulting, resisting or impeding an officer with a deadly or dangerous weapon.

Richard Barnett, photographed with his feet up on a desk in Nancy Pelosi’s office and bragging about stealing property from her office, was indicted on seven counts, including the felony obstruction of an official proceeding charge.

Stephanie Hazelton, the South Jersey right-wing activist known as “Ayla Wolf,” was indicted on six counts, including felonies for civil disorder and obstruction of an official proceeding.

Edward Jacob Lang was indicted on 11 counts, including felonies for civil disorder, assaulting officers and obstruction of an official proceeding.

Melony Steel-Smith, who bragged that she “stormed the castle” on Facebook and posted images from inside Pelosi’s office, was indicted on five counts, including the felony count of obstructing an official proceeding.

Josiah Colt, an Idaho man who rappelled into the chamber of the Senate — which the incorrectly believed was the House chamber — was indicted on four counts, including the felony obstruction of an official proceeding charge.

The FBI recently launched an upgraded portal featuring images of 200 suspects wanted in connection with the Capitol attack, and the agency is continuing to bring new cases. Ins several Capitol cases, prosecutors have filed “information” against a defendant, which typically indicates that a defendant waived their right to an indictment and plans to seek a plea deal, but may also just mean that prosecutors do not intend to seek any felony charges.

Samuel Camarago, who bragged online that he “got some memorabilia, did it myself” with an image of a piece of metal he apparently stole during the Capitol siege, was pretty confident with how things went when he gave the FBI an interview after the Capitol insurrection.

“Just finished speaking to an FBI agent, I believed I’ve been cleared,” Camargo wrote on Facebook.

Court records posted Thursday indicated that Caramargo was indicted.


April 14, 2023: The Associated Press reported: “Capitol rioter who crushed officer with shield gets 7 years” It was written by Michael Kunzelman.

A man who used a stolen riot shield to crush a police officer in a doorframe during the U.S. Capitol insurrection was sentenced on Friday to more than seven years in prison for his role in one of the most violent episodes of the Jan. 6 attack.

Federal prosecutors had recommended a prison sentence of 15 years and eight months for Patrick McCaughey III, which would have been the longest sentence for a Capitol riot case by more than five years.

U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden sentenced McCaughey to seven years and six months in prison followed by two years of supervised release. The judge described McCaughey, 25, as a “poster child of all that was dangerous and appalling about” the Jan. 6, 2021 riot.

“Your actions are some of the most egregious crimes that were committed on that dark day,” the judge told McCaughey.

McCaughey of Ridgefield, Connecticut, expressed shame for joining the mob of then-President Donald Trump’s supporters who “violated” the Capitol.

“I am sorry that I conducted myself less like a citizen and more like an animal that day,” he said.

McCaughey’s 90-month sentence matches the second longest prison sentence so far for a Capitol riot defendant. It’s the same length as the sentence that another judge handed down to Albuquerque Cosper Head, a Tennessee man who dragged Metropolitan Police Department Officer Michael Fanone into a crowd of rioters.

April 14, 2023: Law & Crime posted: “Man who used stolen riot shield to crush police officer in Capital doorway on Jan. 6. gets years behind bars”

One of the men accused in the brutal attack of a Washington, D.C. police officer who was seen being crushed by the riotous mob at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6 has been sentenced to years behind bars.

Patrick E. McCaughey III, 25, of Ridgefield, Connecticut, was sentenced to 90 months in prison for nine offenses, the Justice Department announced in a press release Friday.

“McCaughey was convicted of seven felony charges: three counts of aiding or abetting or assaulting, resisting, or impeding law enforcement officers, including one involving a dangerous weapon; one count of obstruction of an official proceeding; one count of disorderly and disruptive conduct in a restricted building or grounds with a deadly or dangerous weapon, and one count of engaging in physical violence in a restricted building or grounds with a deadly or dangerous weapon,” the press release said.

He was also convicted of two disorderly conduct misdemeanors.

According to prosecutors, McCaughey and his co-defendants, Tristan Chandler Stevens and David Mehaffie had traveled from there homes to Washington D.C., to support then-President Donald Trump, who had spent months falsely stating that the 2020 presidential election was tainted by fraud. As Congress had begun to certify Joe Biden’s electoral win, pro-Trump rioters broke into the Capitol building, forcing lawmakers to either flee the building or shelter in place for hours.

McCaughey, Stevens, and Mehaffie “ultimately broke through the police line after approximately 2:30 p.m., when the line on the West Front failed under siege of the advancing mob,” the DOJ said. They scaled the scaffolding and staircase on the southwest part of the Capitol and converged at the tunnel on the Lower West Terrace, guarded by U.S. Capitol Police Officers and officers from the Metropolitan Police Department.

“Between 2:41 p.m. and 3:19 p.m., the three defendants attempted to break into the building by directing other rioters, participating in heave-hos against the police line, using riot shields stolen from the Capitol Police, and assaulting three specific officers,” The DOJ said.

“Mehaffie hung from an archway and shouted directions from above, and McCaughey and Stevens were key players in the melee below. McCaughey grabbed a riot shield and used it as a weapon.”

Specifically, McCaughey used that stolen riot shield as a weapon against MPD Officer Daniel Hodges, whose struggle against rioters crushing him in a door has become one of the most memorable images to emerge from the riot.

“McCaughey made his way to the front of the mob, where he came face to face with MPD Officer Daniel Hodges,” the government said in its sentencing memorandum. “McCaughey used his riot shield to crush Officer Hodges into the metal doorframe, while yelling at the officer to ‘go home.”

Hodges had testified at trial that he was worried he would lose consciousness. At one point, rioters had ripped Hodges’ gas mask from his face and stole his baton, using it to strike his head.

McCaughey, Stevens, and Mehaffie were convicted in September 2022 after a bench trial before U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden, a Trump appointee and the first judge to issue acquittals for misdemeanors in the Jan. 6 prosecutions. Stevens and Mehaffie are awaiting sentencing.

McCaughey’s sentence is about half the 15 years requested by prosecutors. He had argues for a sentence of one year. McFadden ordered him to serve three years of supervised release and pay $2,000 in restitution toward the estimated $2.9 million in damage and loss to the Capitol resulting from the riot.

At the sentencing hearing, McFadden told McCaughey that he believed he had lied on the stand, according to a report from local CBS affiliate WUSA9.

“Your actions on Jan 6, and in particular your attack on Officer Hodges, made you a poser child for all that was dangerous and appalling about that day,” McFadden reportedly said.

McCaughey was convicted of three separate counts of assaulting, resisting or impeding police, including an enhanced felony charge for using a deadly or dangerous weapon. He was the only defendant not already in pre-trial detention who McFadden “stepped back” — or ordered immediately into custody — following his conviction.

While delivering his verdict, McFadden described in detail the harrowing moment when McCaughey used a riot shield and the force of the mob behind him to pin Hodges in a doorframe while he screamed for help.

McFatten had allowed McCaughey to stay out of custody before sentencing but reportedly ordered him to be reprimanded immediately.

April 14, 2023: WUSA9 reported: ‘Selfless’ Connecticut man who crushed officer in doorframe sentenced to 7.5 years in prison.”

A Connecticut man who crushed a D.C. police officer in a doorframe on Jan. 6, was sentenced Friday to more than seven years in prison — one of the longest sentences to date in a Capitol riot case.

Patrick McCaughey III, who was convicted in a September bench trial of seven felonies and two misdemeanors, was ordered to serve 90 months in prison, to be followed by two years of supervised release, by U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden. McCaughey had faces a recommended sentencing guideline of 151-188 months in prison and prosecutors asked him to receive 15 years behind bars. His attorney, Dennis Boyle, requested a significant downward variance to just one year in prison.

McFadden, a former police officer and 2017 nominee of former President Donald Trump, and already sentenced a number of McCaughey’s co-defendants — and he told McCaughey he viewed him as the most serious offender yet.

Last month, McFadden ordered Geoffrey Sills of Mechanicsville, Virginia, to serve four years in prison for robbing and beating an officer with his own baton. Two weeks earlier, he sentenced Tristan Chandler Stevens, who went to trial with McCaughey, to five years in prison for assaulting former U.S. Capitol Police Sgt. Aquilino Gonell with a riot shield. David Mehaffie, an Ohio man who was convicted of two felony counts but found not to have engaged in or aided the assault on police was sentenced by McFadden to 14 months in prison.

McCaughey was convicted of three separate counts of assaulting, resisting or impeding police, including an enhanced felony charge for using a deadly or dangerous weapon. He was the only defendant not already in pre-trial detention who McFadden “stepped back” or ordered immediately into custody — following his conviction.

While delivering his verdict, McFadden described in detail the harrowing moment when McCaughey used a riot shield and the force of the mob behind him to pin DC Police Officer Daniel Hodges in a doorframe while he screamed for help.

“Officer Hodges’ gut wrenching cries of pain shocked Mr. McCaughey into action,” Judge McFadden said, adding a short time later, “I note that even after he saw Officer Hodges injured, he carried on to battle Officer [Henry] Foulds.”

On Friday, McFadden said he believed McCaughey had lied on the stand and rejected his efforts to downplay his role in the riot.

Hodges testified at trial that he feared he would lose consciousness from the pressure against him and would become a liability for his fellow officers who were attempting to repel the violent mob. In their memo, prosecutors highlighted how McCaughey pinned Hodges for two minutes while he screamed for help.

“In this case, the restraint applied to the victim was neither fleeting nor accidental,” they wrote. “It was concerted, forceful and intended to harm law enforcement generally for defending the tunnel and its entrance.”

McCaughey’s memo struck a decidedly different tone. Over 25 pages, his attorney, Boyle, repeatedly described his 25-year-old client’s “selfless” nature and role as a “pillar in his community” — the affluent Connective town of Ridgefield. McCaughey blamed his father, described variously as a “fervent Trump supporter” and “radical,” for his presence in D.C. His aunt is quoted as remembering him as an “especially kind and thoughtful child.”

Despite claiming he has “fully admitted his role in the riot, McCaughey’s memo only briefly touched upon his actual conduct that day. Hodges’ name only appeared twice in McCaughey’s memo — both times in a footnote arguing his injuries couldn’t be attributed to McCaughey.

In a paragraph beginning on page 22 of 25, McCaughey said his actions were “limited to pushing officers with a riot shield” and were “only impactful due to the force of the protestors who proceeded to push Mr. McCaughey into the line of officers.”

Hodges himself spoke briefly Friday. He laments the loss of the 50 police officers he said he understood had left his department citing Jan. 6, and described McCaughey as the “vanguard of the assault” on the Capitol.

“Of all of the weapons utilized that day, the most offensive one was the mob,” Hodges said.

McCaughey also spoke — striking a different tone than his sentencing memo. In a quiet monotone, he told McFadden he’d acted like a “thug” on Jan. 6 and apologize to the “exhausted, beaten” officers he’d assaulted as part of an “unrelenting mob.” He also apologized to his mother, who was in the courtroom to hear his sentence.

“I’m sorry mother for the anguish I’ve caused and the disappointment I’ve become,” he said. “None of this is your fault.”

McFadden agreed to recommend McCaughey be placed at the low-security prison in Danbury, Connecticut, near where his family is located.

April 14, 2023: The Department of Justice posted “Connecticut Man Sentenced for Felony and Misdemeanor Charges Related To Capitol Breach.”

Defendant Was Among Those Who Joined In Assaults on Officers At Lower West Terrace

A Connecticut man was sentenced today in the District of Columbia on felony and misdemeanor offenses for his actions during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol breach. His actions and the actions of others disrupted a joint session of the U.S. Congress convened to ascertain and count the electoral votes related to the presidential election.

Patrick E, McCaughey III, 25, of Ridgefield, Connecticut, was sentenced to 90 months in prison for nine offenses. He was found guilty following the bench trial, on September 13, 2022, along with co-defendants Tristan Chandler Stevens, 26, of Pensacola Florida, and David Mehaffie, 63, of Kettering, Ohio, who are awaiting sentencing.

McCaughey was convicted of seven felony charges: three counts of aiding or abetting or assaulting, resisting or impeding law enforcement officers, including one involving a dangerous weapon; one count of obstruction of an official proceeding; one count of interfering with a law enforcement officer during a civil disorder; one count of disorderly and disruptive conduct in a restricted building or grounds with a deadly or dangerous weapon. The two misdemeanor charges include: disorderly conduct in a Capitol Building and committing an act of violence in the Capitol Building or grounds.

In addition to the prison term, U.S. District Judge Trevor N. McFadden ordered 36 months of supervised release and restitution of $2,000.

According to the government’s evidence, on Jan. 6, 2021, McCaughey, Stephens, and Mehaffie all traveled to Washington, D.C., from their respective homes. Each illegally made his way on to the restricted grounds of the U.S. Capitol. McCaughey and Stevens taunted officers at the West Front, and Mehaffie yelled at nearby rioters who were hesitating to illegally cross the other perimeter, “If we can’t fight over this wall, we can’t win the battle!”

The three defendants ultimately broke through the police line after approximately 2:30 p.m., when the line on the West Front failed under the siege of the advancing mob. Each of the defendants scaled the Southwest scaffolding and staircase, to converge together at the tunnel created by the inaugural platform structure on the Lower West Terrace of the Capitol Building.

At the Lower West Terrace, officers of the U.S. Capitol Police and Metropolitan Police Department guarded the entrance to the door to the Capitol from the mob — including McCaughey, Stevens and Mehaffie — for several hours.

Between 2:41 p.m., and 3:19 p.m., the three defendants attempted to break into the building by directing other rioters, participating in heave-hos against the police line, using riot shields stolen from Captiol Police, and assaulting three specific officers. Mehaffe hung from an archway and shouted direction from above, and McCaughey and Stevens were key players in the melee below. McCaughey grabbed a riot shield and used it as a weapon. Even after officers finally cleared the tunnel area, the three defendants illegally remained on Capitol grounds.

McCaughey was arrested on Jan. 9, 2021, in South Salem, New York.

The case is being prosecuted by the U.S. Attorneys Officer for the District of Columbia. Valuable assistance was provided by the Department of Justice National Security Division’s Counterterrorism Section and the U.S. Attorney’s Offices for the District of Connecticut.

The case is being investigated by the FBI’s New Haven, Albany, and Washington D.C. Field Officers. Valuable assistance was provided by the U.S. Capitol Police and the Metropolitan Police Department. The FBI’s Washington Field Office identified McCaughey as #62, Stevens as #64, and Mehaffie as #86 on its seeking information photos.

In the 27 months since Jan. 6, 2021, more than 1,000 individuals have been arrested in nearly all 50 states for crimes related to the breach of the U.S. Capitol, including more than 320 individuals charged with assaulting or impeding law enforcement. The investigation remains ongoing.


April 11, 2023: WUSA9 reported “Capitol rioter who dressed like Jack Skellington sentenced to 6 years in prison for assaulting police. It was written by Jordan Fischer.

A Nevada man who attacked multiple police officers while dressed as a character from “The Nightmare Before Christmas” was sentenced to six years in prison on Tuesday on two felony counts.

Josiah Kenyon, 35, of Winnemucca, Nevada, was ordered to serve 72 months in prison and pay $43,315 in restitution by U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols. Kenyon pleaded guilty in September to two felony counts of assaulting police with a dangerous weapon, including one count with an enhancement for causing bodily injury.

According to a statement of facts in Kenyon’s plea agreement, he first attended former President Trump’s “Stop the Steal” rally on Jan. 6 before joining a crowd of thousands of people that marched to the U.S. Capitol Building.

There — while dressed as Jack Skellington from “The Nightmare Before Christmas” — Kenyon used his fist and a flagpole to damage a window and also repeatedly assaulted officer inside the Lower West Terrace Tunnel by throwing multiple objects, including a large plastic pylon, and then attacking them with a table leg with a protruding nail.

“At approximately 5:01:24 JOSIAH KENYON begins striking officers with what appears to be a table leg,” prosecutors wrote in Kenyon’s statement of facts. “He strikes MPD Officer K.H. in the leg after Officer K.H. falls to the ground. Officer K.H. suffered bodily injury in the form of pain and swelling to his right ankle. JOSHUA KENYON then hits MPD Officer C.L. in the head with the chair leg. Officer C.L. is wearing a helmet and as he is truck, a part of the table leg becomes momentarily lodged in the opening between the top of the officer’s face shield and the helmet.”

Prosecutors asked Nichols to sentence Kenyon to 88 months in prison, or more than seven years behind bars. Kenyon’s attorney, assistant federal public defender Ubong Akpan, asked for a lower sentence of four years. In her memo, she highlighted the unfortunate circumstances of his life – including the long period of time he lived on the streets beginning as a teenager. She also argued by late 2020 he had been “continually bombarded with conspiracy theories” and was propelled to action against what he saw as a corrupt government.

“For Josiah, the corruption he believed he had witnessed, along with the impact it had on dashing his hopes for his family, propelled him to action,” Akpan wrote.

Perhaps most dramatically, Akpan argued by Jan. 6 Kenyon had given up on his life.

“He admitted to trying to raise the violence level, but in the end, he was emotional when talking to the police and stated that his ultimate goal was to get shot, believing that he had failed his family and that they would be better off without him,” she wrote.

On Tuesday, Nichols ordered Kenyon to serve 72 months in prison, to be followed by three years of supervised release. Kenyon was also ordered to pay more than $43,000 in restitution to one of the officers he attacked.

More than 1,000 people have now been charged in connection with the Capitol riot, including more than 330 people who have been charged with assaulting, resisting, or impeding police. Of those, more than 100 are accused of using a deadly or dangerous weapon of or causing serious bodily injury.

April 11, 2023: United States Attorney’s Office District of Columbia posted: “Nevada Man Sentenced for Assaulting Officers During Jan. 6 Capitol Breach”

Defendant Threw Objects at Officers, Using Makeshift Weapons, And Damaged Exterior window

A Nevada man was sentenced today for assaulting law enforcement officers with a dangerous weapon during the breach of the U.S. Capitol on Jan 6, 2021. His actions and the actions of others disrupted a joint session of the U.S. Congress that was in the process of ascertaining and counting the electoral votes related to the presidential election.

Josiah Kenyon, 35, of Winnemucca, Nevada, was sentenced to 72 months in prison, 36 months of supervised release, and was ordered to pay $43,315.25 in restitution. Kenyon pleaded guilty to two felonies — assaulting a law enforcement officer with a dangerous weapon and assaulting a law enforcement officer with a dangerous weapon resulting in bodily injury — on September 14, 2022, before U.S. District Court Judge Carl J. Nichols, in the District of Columbia.

According to the court documents, Kenyon was illegally in the Capitol Building from approximately 2:43 p.m. until 3:18 p.m., near a Senate Wing door and the Crypt. Kenyon was wearing a “Jack Skellington” costume, based on a character from the movie “The Nightmare Before Christmas.” While outside the Capitol Building, he and others damaged an exterior window, causing more than $40,000 in damage. Kenyon first attempted to break the window with a closed fist, and then used a flagpole to hit the window.

Between approximately 4:54 p.m. and 5:04 p.m., Kenyon was outside in the Lower West Terrace area. While there, he used a variety of objects to assault officers in the tunnel leading to the Capitol. He threw a large plastic pylon towards officers, striking one officer’s riot shield. He also struck offices with what appeared to be a table leg. He hit one officer in the leg, causing the officer to fall to the ground; the office suffered pain and swelling to his right ankle. He then hit another officer in the head, with the table leg momentarily lodged between that officer’s helmet and face shield.

Kenyon was arrested on Dec. 1, 2021, in Reno, Nevada.

This case was prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia and the Department of Justice National Security Division’s Counterterrorism Section. Valuable assistance was provide by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Nevada.

The case was investigated by the FBI Las Vegas Field Office — Reno Resident Agency, and the FBI’s Washington Field Office, which identified Kenyon as #94 in its seeking information photos. Valuable assistance was provided by the FBI Los Angeles Field Office – West Covina Resident Agency, the Washoe County Sheriff’s Office, Reno, Nevada, the Metropolitan Police Department, the Metro Transit Police Department, and the U.S. Capitol Police.

In the 27 months since Jan. 6, 2021, more than 1,000 individuals have been arrested in nearly all 50 states for crimes related to the reach of the U.S. Capitol, including more than 320 individuals charged with assaulting or impeding law enforcement. Thursday investigation is ongoing.

April 11, 2023: Reno Gazette Journal posted: “Winnemucca man sentenced for assaulting officers during the Jan. 6 Capitol insurrection”

A Winnemucca man was sentenced six years in prison Tuesday for his role in the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.

Josiah Kenyon, 35, threw objects at officers, used makeshift weapons and damaged exterior windows during the Capitol breach, according to the U.S. District Attorney’s Office.

According to court documents, he was dressed in a Jack Skellington costume from the movie “The Nightmare Before Christmas” when he and hundreds of others disrupted a joint session of Congress as it counted electoral votes related to the presidential election.

Kenyon illegally entered the Capitol around 3 p.m. near a Senate wing door and was inside for nearly half an hour.

Prior to entering the building, he and a group of others broke a window — Kenyon first attempted to break it with his fist, then used a flagpole to hit the window.

Kenyon used a variety of objects to assault officers while outside the building. He threw a plastic pylon at officers, striking one officer’s riot shield. He also hit officers with what appeared to be a table leg, striking one in the leg and another in the head. The officer hit in the leg fell to the ground and had swelling in his right ankle; when Kenyon struck the officer in the head, the table leg lodged between the officer’s helmet and face shield.

Kenyon was arrested on Dec. 1, 2021 in Reno.


January 13, 2021: The Associated Press posted: “West Texas flower shop owner charged in Capitol riot” It was written by Jamie Stengle.

A West Texas flower shop owner who posted a video on Facebook bragging about House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s office being broken into during the U.S. Capitol riot last week, was arrested Wednesday, federal officials said.

The FBI arrested Jenny Cudd and another Midland resident, Eliel Rosa, in connection with the Jan. 6 insurrection, said Daryl Fields, spokesman for the U.S. Attorney’s Office in San Antonio.

The Midland Reporter-Telegram reports that Cudd and Rosa appeared Wednesday afternoon before U.S. Magistrate Judge Ronald Griffin in Midland. Each is charged with entering a restricted building and disorderly conducts, both misdemeanors. The court set personal recognizance bonds for them.

In the Facebook video, Cudd says, “we did break down … Nancy Pelosi’s office door.”

But Cudd, a former Midland mayoral candidate, said in a video message to the AP that she didn’t personally go into Pelosi’s office or see people break down the door, and that when she said “we” she meant all of the people who were at the Capitol. She said she didn’t do anything violent or destroy any property.

Her attorney, Don Flanary, said the charges reflect that.

“She basically just been charged with being there,” he said.

“We’re pretty confident that the cameras will show she was only in the public portions of the Capitol,” Flanary said.

After the riot at the Capitol, Cudd’s Midland shop, Becky’s Flowers, was flooded with dozens of one-star reviews in which she was called a traitor and domestic terrorist, along with photos of her inside the Capitol.

“I walked through an open door into the Capitol along with several hundred other people,” Cudd said.

The newspaper reports that Cudd has been active in protests in the Midland area against restrictions because of the coronavirus, including mask mandates and business closures.

It was not immediately clear if Rosa had an attorney and a home phone number could not immediately be found for him.

A mob of President Donald Trump’s supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol building last week following a rally the president held. Prosecutors have filed dozens of cases so far for a variety of offenses ranging from assaulting police officers, to entering restricted areas of the U.S. Capitol, stealing federal property and threatening lawmakers.

January 13, 2021: MRT reported: “Jenny Cudd faces two charges”

Midland’s Jenny Cudd and Eliel Rosa both face two misdemeanor charges related to their participation in the U.S. Capitol riots on Jan. 6.

The charges, as stated in federal court on Wednesday, are entering and remaining on restricted grounds (a class A misdemeanor) and disorderly conduct (a class B misdemeanor). The FBI arrested Cudd and Rosa Wednesday, according to a statement from the U.S. Attorney’s Office.

The initial appearance in federal court took place Wednesday afternoon before U.S. Magistrate Judge Ronald Griffin.

The Court set a personal recognizance (or PR) bond for the two. Currently, there are no restrictions although the federal government can set restrictions if they want. Cudd was represented by Don Flanery. She also will be represented by Marina Medrin when in Washington D.C.

Cudd’s next appearance in court is set for Jan. 21 in D.C. She faces up to one year in prison if found guilty of the class A misdemeanor and up to six months in prison if found guilty of the class B misdemeanor.

October 13, 2021: CNN Politics posted: “Texas florist becomes 100th US Capitol rioter to plead guilty. It was written by Marshall Cohen and Hannah Rabinowitz.

A Texas florist became the 100th person to plead guilty in connection with the January 6 insurrection, a landmark moment more than nine months after the deadly attack on the U.S. Capitol.

Jenny Cudd, 37, pleaded guilty Wednesday to entering a restricted building, namely the Capitol. Cudd could face up to one year in jail, through the federal guidelines call for zero to six months. Capitol rioters with similar cases have received probation or a few weeks behind bars.

The facts of her case are routine, but she went viral in February after she asked a judge to attend a four-day work retreat near Cancun, Mexico. District Judge Trevor McFadden approved her request, citing the fact that prosecutors didn’t have any opposition.

Federal prosecutors say Cudd is unrepentant, citing a Facebook video in which she said, “F— yes, I am proud of my actions, I f–ing charged the Capitol today with patriots today. Hell, yes, I am proud of my actions,” according to court records, and a local news interview in which she said: “I would absolutely do it again.”

The Justice Department has used comments like these to push for harsher sentences, and some judges have cited rioters’ defiance in sending them to jail. Sentencing is set for March 11.

In the nine months since January 6, the Justice Department has charged at least 635 people and has secured 100 guilty pleas, according to CNN’s tally. Most of the guilty pleas involve nonviolent rioters like Cudd. But a handful of more serious defendants have also pleaded guilty, including people with ties to far-right extremists groups and people who assaulted the police.

Seventeen people have been sentenced so far, with punishments ranging from probation to eight months in prison. Three of the four defendants sentenced this week have received jail time.

Cudd’s co-defendant, Brazilian national Eliel Rosa, pleaded guilty to a similar charge in July and was sentenced to one year probation. Cudd and Rosa both live in Midland, Texas.

January 14, 2021: Law & Crime posted: “Woman Who Proudly Admitted to Storming Nancy Pelosi’s Office is Charged in D.C. Insurrection.”

A Texas woman who admitted on camera to storming the office of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has been charged for her part in the D.C. insurrection. Federal prosecutors are going after both Jenny Louise Cudd and co-defendant Eliel Rosa.

In an affidavit, the Federal Bureau of Investigation cited Facebook video in which Cudd said she was present for and participated in events at the Capitol Building.

“I was here today on January 6th when the new revolution started at the Capitol,” she said, according to the FBI.

Supporters of President Donald Trump raided the Capitol Building on January 6, after POTUS continued to claim that he actually won the presidential election and that it was being stolen from him. Insurrectionists paused proceedings but did not stop Congress from certifying results for President-Elect Joe Biden.

People notably broke into Pelosi’s office. Perhaps it’s no surprise since she is oft a target of Trump’s bully pulpit. In any case, Cudd placed herself at the speaker’s office.

“We did break down the Nancy Pelosi’s office door and somebody stole her gavel and took a picture sitting in the chair flipping off the camera,” she said in the FBI’s account of her video.

Rosa was identified through a picture he posted to Facebook of him and Cudd, according to authorities. The feds said they interviewed him in Midland, Texas (where Cudd once ran for mayor), and he admitted that he and she both entered the Capitol Building on January 6.

From the FBI:

Cudd has denied wrongdoing.

“I personally didn’t break anything,” she told The Odessa American in a Jan 7. report. “I didn’t break down any doors. I didn’t do anything violent. No one that I saw had any weapons of any sort.”

She insisted she did not break the law but she and Rosa are being charged with entering the Capitol Building and engaging in disruptive behavior to impede government business. From the FBI:

Your affiant submits there is also a probably cause to believe that Jenny Louis Cudd and Eliel Rosa violated 40 U.S.C. 5104(e), which makes it a crime to willfully and knowingly (D) utter loud, threatening, or abusive language, or engage in disorderly or disruptive conduct, at any place in the Grounds or in any of the Capitol Buildings with the intent to impede, disrupt, or disturb the orderly conduct of a session of Congress or either House of Congress, or the orderly conduct in that building of a hearing before, or any deliberations of, a committee of Congress or either House of Congress; (E) obstruct or impede passage through or within, the Grounds or any of the Capitol Buildings; and (G) parade, demonstrate, or picket any of the Capitol Buildings.

Cudd attorney Don Flanary told the Midland Reporter-Telegram in a Wednesday report that his client will plead not guilty.

The Department of Justice posted: STATEMENT OF FACTS

NOTE: It is not clear exactly when this information was posted.

Your affiant is a Special Agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and have been so employe since January 2004. As a Special Agent with the FBI, I am authorized by law or by a Government agency to engage in or supervise the prevention, detention, investigation or prosecution of a violation of Federal criminal laws.

The U.S. Capitol is secured 24 hours a day by U.S. Capitol Police. Restrictions around the U.S. Capitol include permanent and temporary security barriers and posts manned by U.S. Capitol Police. Restrictions around the U.S. Capitol include permanent and temporary security barriers and posts manned by U.S. Capitol Police.

Only authorized people with appropriate identification are allowed access inside the U.S. Capitol. On January 6, 2021, the exterior plaza of the U.S. Capitol was also closed to members of the public. I am assisting in the investigation and prosecution of events which occurred at the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021.

The U.S. Capitol, which is located at First Street, SE, in Washington, D.C., is secured 24 hours a day by U.S. Capitol Police. Restrictions around the U.S. Capitol include permanent and temporary security barriers and posts manned by U.S. Capitol Police. Only authorized people with appropriate identification are allowed access inside the U.S. Capitol.

On January 6, 2021, the exterior plaza of the U.S. Capitol was closed to members of the public.

On January 6, 2021, a joint session of the United States Congress convened at the United States Capitol, which is located at First Street, SE, in Washington, D.C. During the joint session, elected members of the United States House of Representatives and the United States Senate were meeting in separate chambers of the United States Capitol to certify the vote count of the Electoral College of the 2020 Presidential Election, which had taken place on November 3, 2020.

The joint session began approximately 1:00 p.m. Shortly thereafter, by approximately 1:30 p.m., the House and Senate adjourned to separate chambers to resolve a particular objection. Vice President Mike Pence was present and presiding, first in the joint session, and then in the Senate chamber.

As the proceedings continued in both the House and the Senate, and with Vice President Mike Pence present and presiding over the Senate, a large crowd gathered outside the U.S. Capitol. As noted above, temporary and permanent barricades were in place around the exterior of the U.S. Capitol building and the proceedings underway inside.

At approximately 2:00 p.m., certain individuals in the crowd forced their way through, up, and over the barricades, and officers of the U.S. Capitol Police, and the crowd advanced to the exterior facade of the building. The crowd was not lawfully authorized to enter or remain in the building, and, prior to entering the building, no members of the crows submitted to security screenings or weapons checks by U.S. Capitol Police Officers or other authorized security officials.

At such time, the certification proceedings, still underway and the exterior doors and windows of the U.S. Capitol were locked or otherwise secure. Members of the U.S. Capitol Police attempted to maintain order and keep the crowd from entering the Capitol; however, shortly after 2:00 p.m, individuals in the crowd forced entry into the U.S. Capitol, including by breaking windows and by assaulting members of the U.S. Capitol Police, as others in the crowd encouraged and assisted those acts.

Shortly thereafter, at approximately 2:20 p.m., members of the United States House of Representatives and United States Senate, including the President of the Senate, Vice President Mike Pence, were instructed to — and did — evacuate the chambers. Accordingly, all proceedings of the United States of the United States Congress, including the joint session, were effectively suspended until shortly after 8:00 p.m. the same day.

In light of the dangerous circumstances caused by the unlawful entry to the U.S. Capitol, including the danger posed by the individuals who had entered the U.S. Capitol without any security screening or weapons check, Congressional proceedings could not resume unilaterally after every unauthorized occupant left the U.S. Capitol, and the building had been confirmed secured.

The proceedings resumed at approximately 8:00 pm after the building had been secured. Vice President Pence remained in the United States Capitol from the time he was evacuated from the Senate Chamber until the session resumed.

During national news coverage of the aforementioned events, video footage which appeared to be captured on mobile devices of persons present on the scene depicted evidence of violations of local and federal law, including scores of individuals inside the U.S. Capitol building without authority to be here.

Based on information I have reviewed, I estimate that between approximately 2:36 p.m, and 2:45 p.m., Jenny Louise Cudd, also known as Jenny Haning Cudd on social media platforms, and Eliel Rosa entered the United States Capitol and have observed the following involving Jenny Louise Cudd and Eliel Rosa:

At approximately 2:35 p.m., Jenny Louise Cudd and Eliel Rosa, enter the U.S. Capitol via Upper West Terrace Door.

At approximately 2:36 p.m., Jenny Louise Cudd and Eliel Rosa, are observed inside the Rotunda of the U.S. Capitol from the west side doorway that leads to the Rotunda. They are observed remaining inside the Rotunda until approximately 2:39 p.m. They are further observed taking pictures of the Rotunda and the surrounding area.

At approximately 2:39 p.m., Jenny Louise Cudd and Eliel Rosa are observed walking the Statuary Hall area of the U.S. Capitol.

At approximately 2:40, p.m., Jenny Louise Cudd and Eliel Rosa are observed walking the Statuary Hall Connector and moves off camera at approximately 2:42 p.m.

At approximately 2:43 p.m., Jenny Louise Cudd and Eliel Rosa are observed departing from a large crowd inside the U.S. Capitol in front of the Main Door of the House Chamber and walks east toward the staircase.

Jenny Louise Cudd and Eliel Rosa are subsequently observed walking past the staircase and is further observed walking past the Upper House Door, going toward the other entrance to the House Chamber.

Jenny Louise Cudd and Eliel Rosa are observed at approximately 2:54 p.m. at the Upper House Door and further observed departing the U.S. Capitol.

Kenny Cudd and Eliel Rosa were photographed inside the Capitol Building. Jenny Louise Cudd is the female wearing the tan hat in the front of Figure 1 below. Eliel Rosa is behind Cudd and to her left wearing a red hat.

Afterwards, Jenny Louise Cudd streamed a live video, via Facebook, which is a social media platform. From a screenshot of the video (in Figure 2 below), Jenny Louise Cudd appears to be wearing the same clothing she wore while inside the Capitol as depicted in Figure 1 above. Eliel Rosa posted a photo of himself and Jenny Louise Cudd on his Facebook page.

Facebook video that she was at the Willard Hotel, located on 1401 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington D.C. 2004. During the course of the video she made the following comments to confirm the location and date of the video recording.

“I am sitting in front of the Willard Hotel, as I always do when I am in DC protesting,” and “I was here today on January 6th when the new revolution started at the Capitol.”

In addition, your affiant viewed a photograph of an individual matching the clothing of Jenny Cudd taken inside the Rotunda of the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021. The photograph included the individual matching the description of Jenny Cudd, who was also in the presence of other individuals who unlawfully entered the U.S. Capitol. The video was posted on a Facebook account with the name Jenny Haning Cudd.

During the course of the Facebook video, Jenny Cudd made the following statements indicating her admission of entering the U.S. Capitol. “We were on the south lawn listening to the President and before the speech was over we started to head up to the Capitol.” Your affiant has identified this was the location of a speech given by U.S. President Donald Trump on January 6th in Washington, D.C.

Jenny Cudd further stated, “we just pushed, pushed, and pushed, and yelled go and yelled charge. We just pushed and pushed and we got it.” Your affiant has identified this was a reference to the large crowd of individuals who forced their way inside the U.S. Capitol.

Jenny Cudd stated on video “… and we got in. We got to the top of the Capitol and there was a door open and we went inside.” Jenny Cudd also stated in the video, the following indicating her presence inside the U.S. Capitol, “We did break down the Nancy Pelosi’s office door and somebody stole her gavel and took a picture in he chair flipping off the camera.”

Later in the video recording, she further stated her presence inside the U.S. Capitol. “They had to evacuate it before we charged the Capitol.” Jenny Cudd is referring to members of Congress and the U.S. Senate evacuating the House Chambers and the Senate Floor prior to the forced entry of demonstrators. Jenny Cudd also stated the following during the video, “I stood outside of the Capitol and I will send photos of that too.” In addition, she added the following recorded statement, … fuck yes, I am proud of my actions, I fucking charged the Capitol today with patriots today. Hell, yes, I am proud of my actions.”

On January 8, 2021, Jenny Louise Cudd participated in an interview with a local news station in which she describes her actions on January 6, 2021, in Washington D.C., to include her admission of entering the U.S. Capitol on the same date.

Specifically, Jenny Louise Cudd states during her interview, she stated the following, “we walked up the steps and walked inside an open door (referring to the U.S. Capitol).” Jenny Louise Cudd further stated, “we the Patriots did storm the U.S. Capitol.” She added in reference to entering the U.S. Capitol, “Yes I would absolutely do it again.”

On January 8, 2021, Eliel Rosa was interviewed by the FBI in Midland, Texas. During the interview, Eliel Rosa admitted that he and Jenny Louise Cudd had entered the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021.

Based on the foregoing, your affiant submits that there is a probably cause to believe that Jenny Louise Cudd and Eliel Rosa violated 18 U.S.C. 1752(a)(1) and (2), which makes it a crime to (1) knowingly enter or remain in any restricted building or grounds without lawful authority to do; and

(2) knowingly, and with intent to impede or disrupts the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions; engage in disorderly or disruptive conduct, or within such proximity to, any restricted building or grounds when, or so that, such conduct, in fact, impedes or disrupts the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions; or attempts or conspires to do so.

For purposes of Section 1752 of Title 18, a “restricted building” includes a posted, cordoned off, or otherwise restricted area of a building or grounds where the President or other person protected by the Secret Service, including the Vice President, is or will be temporarily visiting; or any building or grounds so restricted in conjunction with an event designated as a special event of national significance.

Your affiant submits there is also probably cause to believe that Jenny Louise Cudd and Eliel Rosa violated 40 U.S.C. 5104(e), which make it a crime to willfully and knowingly (D) utter loud, threatening, or abusive language, or engage in disorderly or disruptive conduct, at any place in the Grounds or in any of the Capitol Buildings with intent to impede, disrupt, or disturb the orderly conduct of a session of Congress or either House of Congress, or the orderly conduct in that building of a hearing before, or any deliberations of, a committee of Congress or either House of Congress; (E) obstruct, or impede passage through or within, the Capitol Grounds of any of the Capitol Buildings; and (G) parade, demonstrate, or picket in any of the Capitol Buildings.