2020 Presidential Campaign 0 comments on Insurrectionists Are Facing Consequences:

Insurrectionists Are Facing Consequences:

red fire extinguisher on a green wall by Pitor Chrobot on Unsplash

Those who attacked their own nation’s capitol failed to consider the consequences for doing so.

On January 6, 2021, a mob of Donald Trump supporters staged an insurrection at the U.S. Capitol building.

The Guardian reported that people stormed the chambers of the House and Senate while the Electoral College votes were being tallied.

Their actions did not change the outcome of the tally. Representatives and Senators returned to their work later that night to certify Joe Biden’s victory over Donald Trump in the 2020 election.

Many of the insurrectionists quickly found themselves facing consequences for heir actions. Some now face legal charges, and others lost their jobs.


The Guy who Threw a Fire Extinguisher At Police Officers

January 14, 2021: The Wall Street Journal posted “Man Who Allegedly Threw Fire Extinguisher at Police Arrested on Federal Charges.” It was written by Aruna Viswanata and Erin Ailworth.

A retired firefighter from Pennsylvania was arrested Thursday morning for allegedly throwing a fire extinguisher that hit three police officers at the pro-Trump riot at the U.S. Capitol as captured on video, U.S. officials said.

Robert Sanford of Chester, Pa, faces three federal felony charges including assaulting a police officer after he was allegedly identified as the person who lobbed a fire extinguisher on the west side of the Capitol, at around 2:30 pm, as the mob crashed past a thin line of Capitol police officers and stormed toward the building on Jan. 6.

In an affidavit filed in connection with Mr. Sandford’s arrest, an FBI agent described the mob as “insurrectionists.” “The video was shot from an elevated position and showed an area of the Capitol that with a large group of police officers surrounded on at least three sides by a group of insurrectionists,” the statement of facts said. It also described the object hitting all three officers in the head, including one that was not wearing a helmet.

Around the same time, a radio dispatch captured by OpenMHZ, a platform that records radio chatter from law enforcement and life-safety services agencies, relayed an emergency code: “There is a 10-33 at the Capitol building. It has been breached.” The 10-33 code signifies an emergency in which an officer needs assistance.

The extinguisher that Mr. Sandford allegedly threw is separate from the one that killed Officer Brian Sicknick, who was also struck in the head with a fire extinguisher during the unrest and died from his wounds, officials said.

One of the officers who was hit, William Young, was evaluated at a hospital and cleared to return to duty, the charging document said. A friend of Mr. Sanford’s tipped off the FBI to his involvement, the document said adding that he was around 55-years old and had recently retired from the Chester Fire Department.

The tipster relayed to the FBI in an interview that Mr. Sanford had told his friend that he had traveled to Washington D.C., wit ha group of of people on a bus, that the group had gone to the White House and listened to President Trump’s speech “and then had followed the President’s instructions and gone to the Capitol,” the statement said.

Law enforcement officers on Capitol grounds were targeted by the crowd with a variety of makeshift weapons, including extinguishers and flags.

Dispatched captured by OpenMHZ caught several instances of officers injure in the melee.

“Multiple officers injured at the Capitol, west side,” one dispatch says around 1:20 p.m. Another at about 2:05 p.m. relays: “Saying that they have an officer down, hit in the head.”

The charges against Mr. Sanford, who couldn’t immediately be reached for comment, come as prosecutors have filed dozens of cases against the most visible participants in the riot, many of whose efforts were widely broadcast on social media. Neighbors and others who recognized the participants have also provided the Federal Bureau of Investigation with tips about their identities, according to court documents.

Mr. Sanford faces charges of using a deadly weapon in a restricted area, which carries a potential 10 year prison term, disorderly conduct on Capitol grounds, and obstruction law enforcement.

January 14, 2021: The Associated Press reported: “Charges: Ex-firefighter threw extinguisher at Capitol Police” It was written by Michael Rubinkam and Claudia Lauer.

A retired Pennsylvania firefighter was arrested on Thursday on federal charges that he threw a fire extinguisher that hit three Capitol Police officers during the violent siege on the Capitol last week.

Robert Sanford, 55, who retired last year from the Chester Fire Department, outside Philadelphia, turned himself in to the FBI to face charges that include assault of a police officer, disorderly conduct on Capitol grounds, civil disorder and unlawfully entering the Capitol.

Sanford, a supporter of President Donald Trump, got “caught up in the mob mentality,” his lawyer, Enrique Latosion, told The Associated Press.

The charges against Sanford are not related to the widely publicized attack on Officer Brian Sicknick, who also was assaulted with a fire extinguisher during the siege and who later died.

Sanford was held in Pennsylania’s Lehigh County jail, where he had an initial court appearance by video Thursday and was denied bail.

Latoison argued to the judge that Sanford should be released on bail, citing his long service as a firefighter, his strong family ties and his lack of a criminal record. Sanford, a married father of three, did not go to Washington with weapons or the intent of rioting, and does not belong to any extremist groups, Latoison argued.

A federal prosecutor asserted in court — apparently in error — that a search of Sandford’s house Thursday turned up a T-shirt associated with the Proud Boys, a far-right group. Latoison told AP afterwards that an inventory of the search listed no such T-shirt, and said Sanford vigorously denied owning one. The prosecutor later acknowledged she had misspoken, blaming a miscommunication among FBI agents, Latoison said in a follow-up interview late Thursday.

“That’s a big mistake, and I’m not happy about it,” Latoison said. “I thought he was coming home until she came back with that.”

Noting the seriousness of the charges, the judge ordered Sanford to be held without bail, saying he presented a danger to the community.

Authorities said the case will be prosecuted in Washington.

The FBI asked the public this week to help identify a man seen in video stills who picked up a fire extinguisher and threw it at police outside the Capitol on Jan. 6. According to the charging documents, the extinguisher bounced off the heads of three officers, two of whom wore helmets.

Sanford, 55, traveled by bus with other people to the Capitol, according to documents. He told a friend when he returned home that he had been on the grounds for 10 minutes before leaving but did not mention throwing anything at officers authorities said.

The friend saw the photos released by federal authorities and contacted police.

Latoison told AP that Sanford had attended Trump’s rally near the White House, in which the president told his supporters to walk to the Capitol and to “fight like hell” against the election results.

Without acknowledging Sandford’s guilt, Latoison said Sanford marched to the Capitol after Trump’s speech “and things go heated and he unfortunately got caught up.”

“People who seemingly are good people who have good intentions get themselves in a group, and then do something stupid they wouldn’t otherwise do,” he said.

“I’m not defending what happened,” Latoison added.

Sanford joined the Chester Fire Department in 1994 and retired nearly a year ago, according to city officials. He had an unblemished record, a city spokesperson said.

Mayor Thaddeus Kirkland called last week’s riot an act of domestic terrorism and said that if any city employee, current or former, took part in it, “then we hope our legal system will work according to its purpose and bring them to justice.”

April 11, 2023: The Hill reported: “Man who threw fire extinguisher at officers on Jan. 6 sentenced 52 months in prison” It was written by Lauren Sforza.

A Pennsylvania man who threw a fire extinguisher at police officers during the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol was sentenced Tuesday to more than four years in prison.

Robert Sanford, 57, was sentenced to 52 months behind bars, followed by 36 month of supervised release. He pleaded guilty in September to assaulting officers with a dangerous weapon during the Jan. 6 insurrection.

According to the Justice Department, Sanford — who is a retired firefighter — was on Capitol grounds that day as part of a group on the Lower West Terrace, where he threw a fire extinguisher at a group of Capitol Police officers and struck three of them in the head. He also threw a traffic cone aimed at the officers and yelled that they were “traitors,” according to the department.

Sanford was arrested on Jan. 14, 2021, just a little over a week after the attacks on the Capitol, after he turned himself in to authorities.

Federal prosecutors initially wanted a prison sentence of up to 71 months — almost five years — for Sanford.

Prosecutors said in the sentencing memo that one of the officer sustained swelling and a bump on their head after being hit with the fire extinguisher, while another got a medical examination from a hospital but did not report further injuries.

Sanford’s attorney, Andrew Stewart, argued in his memo that the retired firefighter should only be sentenced to 12 months and one day in prison followed by 12 months of at-home confinement, which would then be followed by a three-year term of supervised release. He also argued that the victims hit by the fire extinguisher did not sustain “significant” enough injuries to warrant a sentencing enhancement for causing bodily injury.

Stewart also noted that Sanford has been working with an individual who specializes in “cult deprograming” to help him understand why his beliefs led him to the actions he took on Jan. 6. He also claims that his client is “deeply sorry” for his actions in the memo, which was filed earlier this month.

“During this process, Mr. Sanford was confronted with facts about the “stolen election” conspiracy theory among others and how psychological manipulation is used to indoctrinate the followers of a conspiracy,” Stewart wrote in the memo. “Mr. Sanford learned how mental health problems, wither diagnosed or not, cause isolation which, when paired with a belief in a conspiracy, gradually cause more isolation.”

ABC News reported: With former President Donald Trump’s second impeachment trial starting today, Senate Democrats are focused in trying to tie a direct line between Trump’s rhetoric and the deadly attack on the U.S. Capitol by his supporters.

An ABC News investigation into the nearly 200 accused rioters facing federal charges for their alleged involvement at the Capitol — based on court filings, military records, interviews, and available news reports — found that at least fifteen individuals who stormed the building have since said that they acted based on Trump’s encouragement, including some of those accused of the most violent and serious crimes.

“I believed I was following the instructions of former President Trump,” said Garrett Miller in a statement released through his lawyer. “I also left Washington and started back to Texas immediately after President Trump asked us to go home.”

Miller, who admitted to entering the Capitol in his statement, also threatened to “assassinate” Democrat Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez that same day, which he apologized for.

“While I never intended to harm Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez nor harm any members of the Capitol police force, I recognize that my social media posts were completely inappropriate,” said Miller, who is facing five charges, including making threats, violent entry and disorderly conduct on Capitol grounds. “They were made at a time when Donald Trump had me believing that an American election was stolen. I want to publicly apologize to Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez and the Capitol police offices.”

Robert Bauer told FBI Agents in an interview that he “marched to the U.S. Capitol because President Trump said to do so,” according to court records. Bauer pleaded not guilty to the charges against him, according to local reports. His lawyer declined to comment when reached by ABC News.

At least one rioter said he is willing to testify during the impeachment trial about how Trump’s words resonated with him, according to his lawyer.

“He heard the words of the president. He believed them. He genuinely believed him,” Jacob Chansley’s lawyer, Al Watkins, told ABC News in an interview. “He thought the president was walking with him.”

During his speech at the “Stop the Steal” rally on the National Mall before the riot, Trump had urged his supporters to “walk down to the Capitol” alongside him to protest the certification of the election. “You’ll never take back our country with weakness,” Trump declared. “You have to show strength, and you have to be strong.”

Chansley pleaded not guilty to the charges against him, which include violent entry in a Capitol building and obstruction of an official proceeding.

In their 80-page impeachment brief, Democrats describe the Jan. 6 speech, in which Trump urged supporters to “fight like hell,” as “a militaristic demand that they must fight to stop what was occurring in the Capitol at that very moment.”

Trump’s lawyers have defended his comments at the rally as ones that “fall squarely within the protections of the First Amendment.”

“Mr. Trump, having been elected nationally, was elected to be the voice for his national constituency,” his lawyers wrote in a brief last week.

Among the rioters who now say they took Trump’s words to heart are those accused of perpetrating some of the most violent crimes that day. They include an alleged member of the Proud Boys — which the FBI has characterized as a “nationalist organization whose members sometimes engage in acts of violence” — who was charged with conspiracy to “obstruct, influence, impede, and interfere with law enforcement officers engaged in their official duties.” Also among them is Emanuel Jackson, who allegedly attacked a police officer with a baseball bat.

“The nature of the circumstances of this offense must be viewed through the lens of an event inspired by the President of the United States,” said Jackson’s lawyer of his client’s alleged attack on an officer. He did not respond to ABC News’ request for comment.

Robert Sanford, a Pennsylvania man who is accused of throwing a fire extinguisher at an officer, told investigators he had “followed the President’s instructions and gone to the Capitol,” according to his court records. He pleaded not guilty to the charges against him, according to local reports.

The lawyer for Riley June Williams, who prosecutors allege stole the Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi’s laptop, said in an interview the CNN that her client had taken Trump’s “bait.”

Through social media posts and testimony included in affidavits and other court filings, FBI agents have highlighted how dozens of others facing charges saw Trump’s pleas for his supporters to convene in Washington ahead of the Electoral College vote count as a clarion call that they should be prepared for violence.

On Sunday, a journalist posted a video of what appears to be a rioter reading out the president’s tweets through a megaphone at the Capitol. “Mike Pence didn’t have the courage to do what should have been done to protect our country and our constitution,” a man yells out to a crowd, reading Trump’s tweet from earlier in the day off his phone.

Investigators in recent weeks have signaled that they’re focused on determining to what extent certain participants coordinated the assault on the Capitol, with prosecutors securing multiple grand jury indictments for conspiracy against members of the Proud Boys as well as the far-right Oath Keepers militia.

Last week, federal prosecutors in separate court filings detailed several instances in which six members of the Proud Boys allegedly worked in tandem among scores of rioter overtaking the Capitol.

A self-described “Sergeant at Arms” of the Proud Boys’ Seattle chapter, Ethan Nordean, was arrested last week, with prosecutors pointing to social media posts that they said indicated an “intent to organize a group that intended to engage in conflict” at the Capitol.

“For example, around Dec. 7, 2020, Nordeen posted a message asking for donations of ‘protective gear’ and ‘communications equipment,” the Justice Department said, adding that on Jan. 4, Nordean posted a video on social media which he captioned, “Let them remember the day they decided to make war with us.”

In an FBI affidavit, investigators also highlight a moment captured on video outside the Capitol in which Noreen is seen having a “brief exchange” with a man allegedly connected to the extremist Three Percenters militia group, Robert Gieswein. Moments later, say investigators, Gieswein was allegedly pat of one of the first group of rioters to breach the Capitol building through a broken window.

Prior to former charging him, the FBI had identified Noreen in an affidavit filed in connection with charges brought last month against on of the leaders of the Proud Boys, Joseph Biggs, in which prosecutors noted that both men were seen in videos leading a large crowd of other Proud Boys members toward the Capitol leading up to the riot.

A separate indictment against Proud Boys members Dominic Pezzola and William Pepe accused the two men of conspiring together to obstruct law enforcement seeking to protect the Capitol. Investigators say both men were part of a group that assaulted law enforcement and removed metal barricades on the Capitol grounds, with Pezzola ripping away a police officer’s riot shield that he later allegedly used to break through a window in the front of the Capitol.

“The boss of the country said, “People of the country, come on down, let people know what you think,” Pezzola’s lawyer, Michael Scibetta, said in an interview with Reuters. “The logical thinking was ‘He invited us down.” Scibetta did not respond to ABC News’ request for comment.

Neither Pepe nor Biggs have entered pleas or have attorneys listed in their cases yet.

The most significant conspiracy charges leveled by the Justice Department to date, however, have been in their indictments against Thomas Caldwell, Donovan Crowl, and Jessica Watkins, who investigators say are affiliated with the anti-government Oath Keepers.

Prosecutors allege that the three mounted an “operation” leading up to Jan. 6 in order to interfere with the counting of the Electoral College vote, which involved “recruiting as large a following as possible” to travel to D.C. and forcibly storm the Capitol.

“Evidence uncovered in the course of the investigation demonstrates that not only did CALDWELL, CROWL, WATKINS, and others conspire to forcibly storm the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021 — the communicated with one another in advance of the incursion and planned their attack,” the indictment said.

In an interview with The New Yorker, Crowl admitted to being inside the Capitol, saying he was there to “do security” for “VIPs”. Watkins, in a separate interview with a local Ohio outlet, said the riot was “the most beautiful thing I ever saw until we started hearing glass smash.”

Prosecutors say messages they obtained showed that prior to their arrival in Washington, Caldwell sent a text recommending that the group say at a nearby hotel that “would allow us to hunt at night.”

Even more alarming were alleged exchanges flagged by prosecutors that took place during the attack itself.

Investigators say they obtained an audio recording of Watkins and other unidentified Oath Keepers speaking on a Zello channel called “Stop The Steal J6,” where Watkins is heard saying “We have a good group. We have about 30-40 of us. We are sticking together and sticking to the plan.”

Separately, Caldwell received a series of Facebook messages during the attack, including one in which an unidentified individual said, “All members are in the tunnels under the capital seal them in. Turn on gas.”

After Caldwell posted a message saying “Inside,” he received several other messages, including one saying, “Tom all legislators are down in the Tunnels 3floors down,” and directions such has “Go through the back house chamber doors facing N left down hallway down steps,” according to the Department of Justice affidavits.

The indictments against both the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys members made repeated references to “persons known and unknown,” suggesting that prosecutors are likely to bring more charges as they advance their investigations in the coming weeks and months — with department officials saying act much more serious charges of “seditious conspiracy” are likely to be leveled against certain rioters “very soon.”


The Former Occupational Therapist Woman

January 25, 2021: WTOL 11 updated their article: “Former Cleveland schools charged for alleged role in riot at U.S. Capitol.” It was written by Dave “Dino” DeNatale, Phil Trexler and Will Ujek.

A former occupational therapist for the Cleveland Metropolitan School District has been charged for her role in the riots and breach at the U.S. Capitol in Washington D.C. last week.

According to documents filed in United States District Court, 49-year-old Christine Priola faces charges of knowingly entering or remaining in a restricted building, violent entry and disorderly conduct on Capitol grounds, and unlawful activities on Capitol grounds.

Priola was freed on a $20,000 personal bond following her initial court appearance Thursday afternoon via Zoom in U.S. District Court in Cleveland. She was ordered to be placed on electronic monitoring in her home and is not permitted to travel. 

She only uttered “Yes, your honor” during the 20 minute hearing. She faces up to two years in prison, if convicted. Two federal public defenders were assigned to Priola, who quit her job a day after the riots.

Priola was arrested by FBI agents at her house on Thursday morning. She is currently in the custody of U.S. Marshalls and is scheduled to appear for a hearing in front of the U.S. Federal Magistrate William Baughman on Thursday afternoon.

Last Friday, 3News cameras spotted authorities from the FBI, U.S. Marshalls Service, and Willoughby Police Department taking several file boxes and a large plastic bag of unknown materials from Priola’s Lake County house. Officials also searched the home’s garage and vehicles before leaving the scene around 12:30 a.m. Saturday.

Priola resigned from her position with the CMSD last Thursday. In her resignation letter, she cited her desire to switch career paths to focus on exposing human trafficking and pedophilia and not wanting to take a COVID-19 vaccine in order to return to in-person school. The letter came only after social media users linked her to photos take of a violent mob loyal to President Donald Trump that stormed the U.S. Capitol and forced lawmakers into hiding in an attempt to overturn the presidential election.

Priola filed her resignation, which includes conspiratorial beliefs, Thursday, to the Human Resources Department for the Cleveland Metropolitan School District. Occupational therapists generally work with special needs students.

In her letter, Priola also said she did not support paying union dues that she claims are used to “fund people and groups that support the killing of unborn children.”

“Questions raised today about a former CMSD employee’s alleged involvement in the riots at the U.S. Capitol this week have also raised questions about the District’s position on such behaviors,” district spokesperson Rosann Canfora said in an email Friday.

“Whole CMSD deeply believes in the right of any individual to peacefully protest, as many did on the Capitol plaza on Wednesday afternoon, the District deeply condemns the actions of those involved in the riots inside the Capitol and on the Capitol ground. The right of peaceful protest, as protected by the first amendment, is a foundation of our democracy. The forcible takeover and willful destruction of our government is not.”

The union released a statement from Cleveland Teacher’s Union President Shari Obrenski.

The Cleveland Teachers Union strongly condemns the violent attack on our democratic institutions that occurred this week. Rioters who broke the law should be held fully accountable. Our national affiliate has called for the immediate removal of President Trump for instigating this assault on our country.

“We are aware of reports of Cleveland teachers who engaged in rioting in the Capitol. We take these allegations very seriously, and if true, they must be held accountable.

“While we support the right to peaceful protest, what happened inside the Capitol on Wednesday was not a protest, it was an insurrection. It is the exact opposite of what we teach our students. Anyone who participated must bear the very serious consequences of their actions.”

An Affidavit In Support of a Criminal Complaint was written by David Kasulones, a Deputy United State Marshal with the United States Marshals Service, Cleveland, Ohio. The Criminal Complaint was sworn by telephone after submission of electronic means to Honorable G. Michael Harvey, United States Magistrate Judge.

AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT

I, David Kasaulones, a Deputy United States Marshal with the United States Marshals Service, Cleveland Ohio, being duly sworn, depose and state as follows.

AGENT BACKGROUND

I am an investigative or law enforcement officer of the United States within the meaning of 18 U.S.C 2510(7); that is, an officer of the United States who is empowered by law to conduct investigations of, and to make arrests for, the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. 2516. I have been trained in advanced investigative techniques and have satisfied all requirements defined by the Federal Criminal Investigator Classification established by the U.S. Office of Personnel Management.

I am a Deputy Marshal with the United States Marshal Service (USMS), Department of Justice (DOJ) and as such, am an investigative or law enforcement officer of the United States within the meaning of Rule 41(a)(2)(C) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. I am engaged in the enforcement of criminal laws and is within the category authorized by the Attorney General to request and execute search warrants pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C. 3052 and 3107; and DOJ Regulations set forth at Title 28 C.F.R. 0.85 and 60.2(a).

I have been a Deputy U.S. Marshal since June 1994 and attained a Bachelor of Science Degree from Cleveland State University in Cleveland, Ohio. I have successfully completed training at the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center to include: USMS Basic Deputy U.S. Marshal Training, Federal Criminal Investigator Training, Advanced Deputy U.S. Marshal Training, and USMS Supervisory and Leadership Training. I also successfully attended the training at the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in Quantico, Virginia for the Basic Joint Terrorism Task Force Program. As such I am assigned as a Task Force Officer (TFO) with the FBI’s Counterterrorism Division in Cleveland, Ohio. I have conducted numerous federal criminal investigations and assisted in numerous prosecutions.

Over the course of my employment as a Deputy U.S. Marshal, I have conducted and participated in multiple criminal investigations that have resulted in arrests for criminal offenses. These crimes resulted in subsequent convictions in Federal Courts.

PURPOSE OF AFFIDAVIT

This affidavit is being submitted for the limited purpose of establishing probable cause to believe that CHRISTINE PRIOLA has violated Title 18 U.S.C. 1752, Restricted Buildings or Grounds; Title 40 U.S.C. 5401(e)(2)(A) and (D), Unlawful Activities on Capitol Grounds; Disorderly Conduct; and Title 40 U.S.C. 5104(f), Unlawful Activities on Capitol Grounds, Parades, Assemblages and Displays of Flags, as set forth below.

A. Title 18 U.S.C. 1752(a)(2): Restricted Building or Grounds; Whoever knowingly, and with intent to impede or disrupt the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions, engages in disorderly or disruptive conduct in, or within such proximity, any restricted building or grounds when, or so that, such conduct, in fact, impedes or disrupts the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions;

B. Title 40 U.S.C. 5104(e)(2): Unlawful Activities on Capitol Grounds; An individual or group of individuals may not willfully and knowingly (A) enter or remain on the floor of either House of Congress or in any cloakroom or lobby adjacent to that floor, in the Rayburn Room of the House of Representatives, or in the Marble Room of the Senate, unless authorized to do so pursuant to rules adopted, or an authorization give, by that House; or (D) utter loud, threatening, or abusive language, or engage in disorderly or disruptive conduct, at any place in the Grounds or in any of the Capitol Buildings with the intent to impede, disrupt, or disturb the orderly conduct of a session of Congress or either House of Congress, or the orderly conduct in the building of a hearing before, or any deliberations of, a committee of Congress or either House of Congress; and

C. Title 40 U.S.C. 5104(1)(2): Unlawful Activities on Capitol Grounds: A person may not display in the Grounds a flag, banner, or device deigned or adapted to bring into public notice a party, organization or movement.

The statements contained in this affidavit are based in part on: information provided by FBI Special Agents, Task Force Officers and FBI Analysts, written reports about this and other investigation that I have received, directly or indirectly, from other law enforcement agents, information gathered from the results of physical surveillance conducted by law enforcement agents, reporting by eye witnesses, independent investigation and analysis by FBI agents/analysts and computer forensic professionals, and my expertise, training and background as a Deputy U.S. Marshal. Because this affidavit is being submitted for the limited purpose of securing a criminal complaint, I have not included each and every fact known to me concerning the investigation. Instead, I have set forth only the facts that I believe or necessary to establish the necessary foundation for the requested complaint.

JURISDICTION

This Court has jurisdiction to issue the requested warrant because it is a “court of competent jurisdiction” as defined by 18 U.S.C. 2711. 18 U.S.C. 2703(a), (b)(1)(A), and (c)(1)(A). Specifically, the Court is “a district court of the United States … that- has jurisdiction over the offense being investigated.” 18. U.S.C. 2711(3)(A)(i). As discussed more fully below the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia is investigating this case, which, among other things, involve possible violations of violated 18 U.S.C. 1752, Restricted Buildings or Grounds; Title 40 U.S.C. 5104(e)(2)(A)and(D), Unlawful Activities on Capitol Grounds, Parades, Assemblages and Display of Flags. The conduct at issue includes an overt act in the District of Columbia, in the form of entering into Congress on January 6, 2021, as part of the mob that disrupted the proceedings of Congress, engaged in property damage and theft, and caused physical injury.

BASIS FOR PROBABLE CAUSE

The U.S. Capitol, which is located at First Street, SE, in Washington, D.C., is secured 24 hours a day by U.S. Capitol Police. Restrictions around the U.S. Capitol include permanent and temporary security barriers and posts manned by U.S. Capitol Police. Only authorized people with appropriate identification are allowed inside the U.S. Capitol.

On January 6, 2021, the exterior plaza of the U.S. Capitol was closed to members of the public.

On January 6, 2021, a joint session of the United States Congress convened at the United States Capitol, which is located at First Street, SE, in Washington, D.C. Specifically, elected members of the United States House of Representatives and the United States Senate were meeting in separate chambers of the Capitol to certify the vote count of the Electoral College of the 2020 Presidential Election, which had taken place on November 3, 2020. The joint session began approximately 1:00 p.m. Vice President Mike Pence, was present and presiding in the Senate chamber.

With the joint session underway and with Vice President Pence presiding, a large crowd gathered outside the U.S. Capitol. Temporary and permanent barricades surround the exterior of the U.S. Capitol building, and U.S. Capitol Police were present and attempting to keep the crowd away from the Capitol building and the proceedings underway inside.

At approximately 2:00 p.m., certain individuals in the crowd forced their way through, up, and over the barricades and officers of the U.S. Capitol Police, and the crowd advanced to the exterior facade of the building. At such time, the joint sessions was still underway and the exterior doors and windows of the U.S. Capitol were locked or otherwise secured.

Members of the U.S. Congress attempted to maintain order and keep the crows from entering the Capitol; however, at approximately 2:15 p.m., individuals in the crowd forced entry into the U.S. Capitol, including by breaking windows. Shortly thereafter, members of the United States House of Representatives and United States Senate, including the President of the Senate, Vice President Pence, were instructed to — and did – evacuate the chambers. Accordingly, the joint session of the United States Congress was effectively suspended until approximately 8:00 p.m.

During national news coverage of the aforementioned events, video footage, which appeared to be captured on mobile devices of persons present on the scene depicted evidence of scores of individuals inside the U.S. Capitol building, without authority to be there, in violation of federal laws.

United States Capitol Police (“Capitol Police”) learned that individuals entered the restricted floor area of the Senate chambers and took photographs of the evacuation of the Senate chambers that were required based on the unauthorized entrance. Upon making entry, individuals were observed carrying signs, flags, banners, and other items not authorized to be carried in the Senate chambers. The individuals gaining unauthorized access to the Senate chambers were also observed using smart cellular telephones and other electronic recording and storage devices to record, photograph, and broadcast their actions over social media.

These photos and electronic images were circulated on numerous news media platforms, some of which showed an individual holding a sign reading, in part, “The Children Cry Out for Justice.” and pointing a smart cellular telephone device at an individual occupying the seat of the Vice President of the United States. The female appears to be holding the digital media device in a manner consistent with taking photographs of videos, both of which are capable of being digitally stored and disseminated. The female was wearing a red winter coat and distinctive pants that appeared to have the name “Trump” and other words written on the leg.

On or about January 8, 2021, via a Twitter post, the Cleveland Division of the FBI received an anonymous tip that Christine PRIOLA was the female depicted in the photographs described above. In the Twitter post photograph, PRIOLA is seen standing inside the U.S. Senate Chambers holding up a sign under one arm and mobile (smart) phone. She is wearing a red coat and distinctive pants. The Twitter post also identified PRIOLA as being employed with the Cleveland Metropolitan School District (CMSD).

Also on or about January 8, 2021, I identified PRIOLA as Christine Marie PRIOLA of Willoughby, Ohio, by comparing photographs from the Ohio Law Enforcement Gateway with photographs from January 6, 2021. I received verification from the CMSD that PRIOLA resigned from her position with the CSMD in a letter dated January 7, 2021.

Based on the information described above, a search of PRIOLA’s house was authorized on January 8, 2021 by a judicial officers in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. On January 8, 2021, law enforcement agents executed a search warrant at PRIOLA’s residence and recovered a laptop computer; two desktop computers, several thumb drives, and an Apple iPhone. I am further informed that agents recovered clothing, a sign and other materials with the photographs of PRIOLA taken on January 2021.

During the search, PRIOLA directed agents to the kitchen where she gave them the above-identified iPhone and confirmed it was hers. Subsequent forensic examination confirmed that the T-Mobile account associated with the iPhone was registered in PRIOLA’s name.

During a subsequent search of PRIOLA’s Apple iPhone on or about January 12, 2021, agents were unable to recover data for photos, videos, chats, or messages from approximately January 4 through January 7, 2021. Agents were also unable to recover device location data for January 6, 2021, from 5:40AM to 4:17PM. This data indicated that the device was utilizing a WiFi system located at GPS coordinates (38.892002, – 77.006646). According to Google Maps, these coordinates correspond to a location just northeast of the U.S. Capitol building.

Based on my training and experience, and my knowledge of the facts uncovered in this investigation to date. I believe that at no time on or before January 6, 2021, was PRIOLA granted permission or authorized by rule to enter or remain on the floor of either House of Congress, nor did she, at any time, have authorization to assemble, display flags, or parade on the Grounds or in the Capitol Building.

CONCLUSION

Based on the above factual allegations, I submit that probably cause exists to believe that CHRISTINE PRIOLA, has violated Title 18 U.S.C. 1752, Restricted Buildings or Grounds, Title 40 U.S.C. 5104(e)(2)(A) and (D), Unlawful Activities on Capitol Grounds; Disorderly Conduct; and Title 40 5104(f), Unlawful Activities on Capitol Grounds, Parades, Assemblages and Display of Flags.

July 26, 2022: United States Attorney’s Office District of Columbia posted a press release: “Ohio Woman Pleads Guilty to Felony Charge for Actions in Jan. 6 Capitol Breach”

Defendant Illegally Entered Senate Chamber

An Ohio woman pleaded guilty today to a felony charge for her actions during the breach of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Her actions and the actions of others disrupted a joint session of the U.S. Congress convened to ascertain and count the electoral votes related to the presidential election.

Christine Priola, 50, of Willoughby, Ohio, pleaded guilty in the District of Columbia to obstruction of an official proceeding. According to court documents, on Jan. 6, 2021, Priola made her way to the U.S. Capitol grounds, carrying a sign expressing her views. Once on the grounds, she illegally entered the restricted area on the east side of the Capitol Building.

Priola joined the front lines of the riot, climbed the steps, and entered the Capitol Building through the East Rotunda Doors. She went inside soon after the first rioters overcame law enforcement officers guarding the entrance. She moved to the Senate chamber and entered the restricted floor area. While in the chamber, she carried the sign. She was in the Senate chamber for about 10 minutes. All told, she was inside the Capitol Building for approximately 30 minutes.

Sometime between Jan. 6 and Jan. 12, 2021, Priola deleted her cellphone data for photos, videos, chats, and messages from approximately Jan. 4 through 7, 2021. At the time of the riots, she was employed with the Cleveland Metropolitan School District. She resigned in a letter dated Jan. 7, 2021.

Priola was arrested in Ohio on Jan. 14, 2021. She is to be sentenced on October 28, 2022. She faces a statutory maximum of 20 years in prison and potential financial penalties. A federal district court judge will determine any sentence after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.

The FBI’s Cleveland Field Office investigated the case, with valuable assistance from the U.S. Marshals’ Service for the Northern District of Ohio, the FBI’s Washington Field Office, the U.S. Capitol Police, and the Metropolitan Police Department.

In the 18 months since January 6, 2021, more than 850 individuals have been arrested in nearly 50 states for crimes related to the breach of the U.S. Capitol, including over 260 individuals charged with assaulting or impeding law enforcement. The investigation remains ongoing.


The Confederate Flag Carrying Guy

February 9, 2023: NBC News posted: “Man Who Carried a Confederate Flag In the Capitol On Jan. 6 is Sentenced to 3 years” It was written by Daniel Barnes.

A Delaware man who carried a Confederate flag through the U.S. Capitol during the Jan. 6 riot was sentenced to three years in prison on Thursday.

Kevin Seefried, 53, was convicted on five charges stemming from his participation in the riot, including obstruction of an official proceeding — the joint session of Congress that was working to certify the Electoral College vote that day.

The government had sought a 70-month sentence for Seefried, while his lawyers asked for one year in prison.

U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden, a Trump-appointed judge who oversaw the trial, told Seefried it was “shocking” and “outrageous” that he brought a Confederate flag into the Capitol. He also criticized Seefried for using a flag to jab a Black U.S. Capitol Police officer during the confrontation in the building.

“I hope you realize how offenses if is,” McFadden said.

An emotional Seefried addressed the court before being sentenced and apologized, saying that he made a terrible mistake and his family has suffered for it.

“I thought that standing there and using my voice was protected under freedom of speech, but I know I crossed the line,” he said. “I never wanted to send a message of hate.”

Photographs of Seefried walking through the Capitol with his Confederate flag quickly became some of the most well-known images from the Jan. 6 assault. Seefried brought the flag “as a symbol of protest, but had not considered the logic of those who see the flag as a symbol of American racism,” his lawyers wrote in their sentencing memorandum filed last week.

“Now that photos of him with the flag have become iconic symbols of the horror of January 6, Mr. Seefried completely understands the harm he caused,” the wrote, adding that Seefried is aware that the community and even history, may view him as a racist.”

Seefried was the first rioter in the building to interact with U.S. Capitol Police Officer Eugene Goodman, who led Seefried and other rioters away from the entrance to the Senate chamber, prosecutors said. Goodman had ordered Seefried to leave the building. In response, Seefried asked Goodman where the members of Congress were and “jabbed the base of the flagpole at him,” prosecutors said.

“You can shoot me man, but we’re coming in,” Seefried told Goodman, according to prosecutors.

Seefried attended the riot with his son, Hunter, 24, who was charged alongside him and was already sentenced in October to two years in prison. During Hunter’s sentencing, his lawyer blamed the elder Seefried for allegedly pressuring his son to Storme the Capitol. Kevin Seefried was granted permission by a judge to travel to Washington to attend his son’s sentencing but was not seen in the courtroom during the October hearing.

More than 900 people have been arrested in connection with Jan. 6 so far, resulting in nearly 500 guilty pleas and dozens of significant prison sentences. The investigation is ongoing.

February 9, 2023: CNN Politics posed: “Man who used Confederate flags against Capitol Police officer on January 6, sentenced to 3 years in prison” It was written by Holmes Lybrand.

A Delaware man who carried a large Confederate flag inside the US Capitol during the January 6, 2021 riot and was part of the mob that chased a US Capitol Police officer has been sentenced to three years in prison.

DC District Judge Trevor McFadden found Kevin Seefried guilty in June of each of the five charges he faced, including obstructing an official proceeding, disorderly conduct in a Capitol building and entering and remaining in a restricted area.

During the bench trial before McFadden, USCP Officer Eugene Goodman testified that Seefried had jabbed the base of the flag pole toward him multiple times to try and push him away. Seefried, Goodman said, eventually moved back to rejoin the mob after the officer didn’t move.

According to Goodman, Seefried “was saying things like F**k you, I’m not leaving, where are the members at, where are they counting the votes.”

Seefried recalled in an interview with that FBI that he told Goodman “You can shoot me, man, but we’re coming in,” according to prosecutors.

Before handing down his sentence, McFadden said it was “outrageous” and “egregious” that Seefried brought the Confederal flag to the Capitol that day and “used it to jab at an African American officer.”

“You participate in a national embarrassment,” the judge said.

Goodman, who has been hailed for his actions on January 6, eventually led the group of rioters away from the Senate chamber and up a flight of stairs to a line of additional offices.

In comments to the court Thursday, Seefried apologized to the officers protecting the Capitol that day and said he was “deeply sorry for my part in January 6.”

“I never wanted to send a message of hate,” Seefried said.

Seefried’s son, Hunter, who was with his father in the Capitol that day, was convicted of several charges he faces and sentenced in October to serve two years in prison.

Eugene Ohm, Kevin Seefried’s attorney, said during the trial that his client wasn’t aware the Electoral College votes were being certified that day and therefore couldn’t have tried to intentionally obstruct the congressional proceeding.

February 9, 2023: The BBC reported: “Capitol rioter who jabbed Confederate flag at black cop jailed”

A rioter who grabbed a Confederate flag at a black policeman while storming the U.S. Capitol two years ago has been sentenced to three years in prison.

Kevin Seefried, 53, was convicted in June of obstruction Congress and unlawful parading.

Images of him bearing the banner of the slaveholding South during the US Civil War in the seat of American democracy ricocheted around the world.

A judge in Washington DC called Seefried’s actions “outrageous.”

Seefried thrust the base of the flagpole at US Capitol Police Officer Eugene Goodman, who is black, several times without making contact, prosecutors said.

During Thursday’s sentencing, Judge Trevor McFadden noted this incident and said: “I hope you realize how deeply offenses, how troubling it is.”

Mr. Goodman has previously recalled that Seefried told him: “You can shoot me, man, but we’re coming in.”

Prosecutors said Seefried was the 12th rioter to enter the Capitol that day, coming in through a broken window, and that he remained inside for 25 minutes.

The drywall mechanic from Laurel, Delaware, told the court he regretted his actions and had “crossed the line” during the raid on the Capitol on January 2021.

“My intention was to use my voice,” he told the judge. “I never wanted to send a message of hate.”

Judge McFadden found Seefried guilty of other charges, including entering a restricted building and disorderly conduct.

The three-year sentence is shorter than the nearly six years that was sought by prosecutors.

Seefried’s son, Hunter, was also at the Capitol during the riot. He was convicted of obstruction and sentenced to two years in prison last year.

Both had traveled to Washington DC to attend a rally hosted on the day of the riot by then-President Donald Trump, who riled up supporters with unfounded claims that Joe Biden stole the election of November 2020.

More than 940 people have been charged with federal crimes related to the breach on the U.S. Capitol. and nearly 500 have pleaded guilty so far.

February 9, 2021: CBS News reported: “Kevin Seefried, Jan. 6 rioter who carried a Confederate flag through the Capitol, sentenced to 3 years in prison.” It was written by Robert Legare, and Scott McFarlane.

The pro-Trump rioter who marched through the halls of Congress while wielding a Confederate flag on Jan. 6, 2021, was sentenced on to 36 months behind bars on Thursday, more than two years after photos of him became some of the most widely recognized images of the attack on the Capitol.

Kevin Seegfried, 53, was convicted in June 2022 after a bench trial before Judge Trevor McFadden of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, who found him of multiple charges, including obstruction Congress, entering a restricted building, disorderly conduct and unlawful parading. His son, Hunter, was also convicted on the obstruction charge, but acquitted on other counts. Hunter was sentenced two years in prison last year.

McFaden handed down the elder Seefried’s three-year sentence in court on Thursday, calling his conduct “outrageous” and “especially shocking.” Seefried, who must also serve one year on probation upon his release, told the judge he “crossed the line” and regretted his actions.

The sentence was shorter than the 70 months, or nearly six years, that prosecutors had sought.

The Seefried’s traveled to Washington, D.C., to attend then-President Donald Trump’s “Stop the Steal” rally near the White House on Jan. 6. Prosecutors say they were among the first protestors to then breach the Capitol and enter through a broken window, remaining inside for 25 minutes. Kevin Seefried was photographed a short time later with the Confederate flag. According to court documents, he said he brought the flag from his home in Delaware, where it usually hands outside.

Handing down his sentence, McFadden noted that Seefried confronted U.S. Capitol Police Officer Eugene Goodman, a Black man, near the Senate chamber and jabbed his flagpole at him.

“Sir, I hope you realize how deeply offensive, how troubling it is,” McFadden said.

Speaking in court and becoming emotional, Seefried said he was “deeply sorry” for his actions.

“I had no idea that any of this would ever happen,” he said. “My intention was to use my voice … I never wanted to send a message of hate.”

Defense attorney Eugene Ohm emphasized that his client turned himself in voluntarily and exposed no violent rhetoric on social media, in contrast to some Jan. 6 defendants. “As soon as he figured out what he had done, he acted remorseful,” Ohm said, despite the fact that Seefried fought the charges at trial.

Goodman, who testified during the trial last year, said he was inside the Capitol Rotunda during the attack when a group that included Seefried yelled “Where the member at?” They threatened Goodman taunting, “What are you going to do, shoot us?”

Goodman has since been recognized for leading the mob away from the Senate chambers and toward an area of the building where there was a larger law enforcement presence. The officer described Seefried as angry and ‘The complete opposite of pleasant.”

In court documents filed ahead of sentencing, prosecutors urged the court to impose a stiff sentence, arguing that Seefried “stood resolute with the rioters, who demanded to know the location of the United Stats senators and representatives who gathered to certify the votes of the Electoral College.”

“During their confrontation, Seefried thrust the butt of his flagpole at Officer Goodman,” prosecutors wrote. “That flagpole was not only a weapon capable of causing serious injury; a Confederate Battle lag was affixed to it and it was brandished by a man standing at the front of a volatile, growing mob towards a solitary, Black police officer.”

Seefried’s public defenders wrote their client expressed “immediate and unwavering” remorse for his actions during the Capitol breach, explaining he brought the Confederate flag to the protest and not to express any form of racism.

“He is ashamed, mindful that the community and even history may view him as a racist. And he knows that he must be punished for his role in the events of that infamous day,” the defense team argued in court documents ahead of Thursday’s hearing.

Despite knowing he was entering the Capitol that day, Seefried’s attorneys wrote that the defendant — a construction worker — did not intend to obstruct Congress’ work, but to make his view known at the behest of the former president.

“Crowds around the Seefrieds were shouting that the President was going to meet them at the Capitol,” the defense attorneys argued in court papers, highlighting that the fact that Trump told his supporters he was going to march to the Capitol with them. “The fallout for heeding Mr. Trump’s call has been devastating: Mr. Seefried’s wife has left him, he is headed to prison and he will be destitute when he is released. Worst of all, his beloved son is in prison.”

“He cannot help but be afraid to ever trust a politician again,” his lawyers wrote.

October 24, 2022: NBC Washington posted: “Man who Stormed Capitol With Dad Gets 2 Years in Prison”

A Delaware man who stormed the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, with his Confederate flag-toting father was sentenced on Monday to two years behind bars.

Hunter Seefried, 24, was convicted alongside his father of felony and misdemeanor charges by U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden in June. Hunter and Kevin Seefried opted for a bench trial, which is decided by a judge, rather than have their case be heard by a jury.

The father and son traveled to Washington from their home in Laurel, Delaware, to hear Trump’s speech at the “Stop the Steal” rally on Jan. 6. They were among the first rioters to approach the building near the Senate Wing Door, according to prosecutors.

After watching other rioters use a police shield and a wooden plank to break a window, Hunter Seefried used a gloved fist to clear a large shard of glass in one of the broken windowpanes, prosecutors said. The judge found the two other rioters had destroyed the window before Seefried cleared the piece of glass.

Widely published photographs showed Kevin Seefried carrying a Confederate battle flag inside the Capitol after he and Hunter, then 22, entered the building through a broken window.

An attorney for Hunter Seefried had asked for probation and home detention instead of prison time. He said in court paper that his client only when to the Capitol that day because his father pushed him to join. And he noted that the son never hurt or threatened anyone at the Capitol.

“Hunter is a decent, hardworking and caring young man, who was misled and got caught up in the unfortunate events of January 6, 2021.” attorney Edson Bostic said in an email. “He is very remorseful and wished he could relive and change his behavior that day.”


Man Sentenced to 20 Years For Attacking Police in Jan. 6 Riot At the U.S. Capitol

August 5, 2024: Law & Crime reported: “Jan. 6 defendant who climbed rioters ‘like human scaffolding’ to stomp on heads of police deserves harsh sentence: Feds”

Federal prosecutors have urged a judge to sentence “one of the most violent rioters” at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, David Nicholas Dempsey, to 21 years in prison, highlighting a recent sentencing memorandum that Dempsey clawed his way through the mob by climbing atop his fellow rioters and using them “like human scaffolding” in order to thrust himself to the mouth of a crowded tunnel where he used his hands, feet, flagpoles, crutches, pepper spray, pieces of broken furniture and “anything else he could get his hands on” as weapons.

“Dempsey’s violence reached such extremes that, at one point, he attacked a fellow rioter who was trying to disarm him,” prosecutors wrote in a 46-page sentencing memorandum entered Aug. 2 in federal court in Washington, D.C.”

Dempsey was arrested in California in August 2021 and an indictment was unveiled against him in September 2021. He was charged with felony obstruction of an official proceeding, felony assaulting, resisting or impeding certain offers using a dangerous weapon, felony obstruction of law enforcement during civil disorder, felony entering or remaining, disorderly and disruptive conduct and engaging in physical violence in a restricted building or grounds with a deadly weapon, misdemeanor disorderly conduct in a Capitol building or grounds and act of physical violence in the Capitol grounds or building.

He struck a plea deal with prosecutors in January and pleaded guilty to two assault with a dangerous weapon charges.

Court records show that on Jan. 6, Dempsey doused police with a torrent of pepper spray including one officer who, just moments before, had his face mask compromised by a different rioter. Dempsey attacked another police officer ferociously with a metal crutch. He cracked that officer’s protective shield and gas mask, forcing the officer to “collapse in a daze, his ears ringing.”

The blow by Dempsey also cut the officer’s head and caused a concussion.

Dempsey swung “pole-like weapons more than 20 times,” and sprayed chemical agents on at least three distinct occasions. He hurled objects at police at least 10 times and was seen “stomping on the heads of police officers as he perched above them some five times. He attempted to seal a riot shield and police baton while that the Lower West Tunnel and he did it all while screaming treats and insults, prosecutors say.

He had arrived in Washington, D.C, on Jan. 5 and records show he flew from California to Michigan, met two people in Detroit and they drove the rest of the way. His driving companions were not charged but prosecutors said one of them assisted Dempsey with getting an incriminating video temporarily removed from YouTube. That person did not enter the Capitol nor assault police, according to prosecutors.

He donned a BulletSafe tactical vest, helmet, camouflage-style pants, a long sleeve shirt, sunglasses and an American flag gaiter around his neck, mouth and nose.

Remarkably, before he set out on his one-man melee, prosecutors told the federal judge who will sentence Dempsey that they found video of him giving an interview in front of a wooden makeshift gallows erected on Capitol grounds. The structure bore a sign that said, “This is Art” and it hung from a noose.

In a transcript of that interview shared with the court, Dempsey seethed:

This isn’t just art. This is necessary […] No, we don’t need to waste taxpayer dollars on these worthless cretins who are treasonous to our country. We need to decriminalize help and marijuana, turn all that s — into rope when where does with it, and then string all of these f —‘ worthless bastards up from the top of those [pointing to the gallows], these treelines, the rafters, the rooftops, the statues. I don’t care where they go.

String ’em up and string ’em up high. And let everybody know that this is what happens when you are a treasonous piece of s– who doesn’t belong in this f— ‘ country and has this f—‘ country’s worst objective at heart. So, I’m 100% with it.

I say we should have been doing this a long f—‘ time ago. Them worthless f—‘s holes Jerry Nadler, f—‘ Pelosi, uh Clapper, Comey, f—‘ all those pieces of garbage, you know, Obama, all of these dues. Clinton, f— all these pieces of s—. That’s what they need [pointing to the gallows]. They don’t need a jail cell. they need to hang from these motherf—–while everybody videotapes it and f—” spreads it on YouTube, Bitchute, or whatever f— ‘other social media there is.

And they need to get the point across, the time for peace talk is over. All that’s s— about being complacent, f— all that s—. For four years, five years really, they’ve been f—–g demonizing us, belittling us, hurting us, killing us, f—- doing everything they can to stop what this is [referring to the rally for former President Trump] and people are sick of the s— . You know, and uh, hopefully one day soon, we really have someone hanging from one of these mothersf—- [pointing to the gallows] just line they do in them other countries.”

Dempsey joined a large crowd that formed at the back of the tunnel around 4 p.m. and “climbed atop the shoulders, arms, and backs of other rioters to get to the front of the line,” the sentencing memo said.

Once there, he threw a short pole-like object at police, hitting one officer as he taunted him. He grabbed a police riot shield and attempted to throw it. Then, moments later, he hurled a flagpole at officers who were crammed into the tunnel. Footage showed Dempsey grabbing an officer’s baton and trying to yank it away. He also grasped framing at the side and top of the tunnel to steady himself above the officer’s heads before he began “stomping on the officers at the front line.”

After minutes of stomping on their heads and shields, he took a long pole and started prodding officers with it, prosecutors say.

As one fellow rioter tried to take the long pole from Dempsey, prosecutors say he “stomped” in that rioter too.

He proceeded to unleash bursts of pepper spray into the tunnel and, at one point, chucked a bottle containing a “unknown milky substance” at police which splashed onto a closed circuit security camera.

“That obscured the recording of the events in the tunnel, and hampered the government’s investigation of the events at the tunnel,” prosecutors wrote on Aug 2.

For more than a half hour, Dempsey beat police and waived rioters forward. He told officers they were “pedophile supporting oath breakers” and screamed at them to “come out here.”

He retreated just once to rinse pepper spray from his eyes and face before he returned with a new gator on. Then he hurled broken pieces of furniture into the tunnel.

Prosecutors urged a stiff sentence in light of these actions and Dempsey’s criminal history.

The former construction worker and fast food employee pleaded no contest to second-degree burglary in 2009, in Los Angeles and was sentenced to 16 months. In 2012, he pleaded no contest to conspiracy and grand theft in Burbank and, in 2014, pleaded no contest to burglary charges again. In 2017 he plead no contest after he broke into a Van Nuys cellphone store, stole property and then fled. When the police stopped Dempsey in 2017, prosecutors say he pretended to cooperate before fleeing in his car at speeds of over 100 mph.

More burglary charges and no contest or nolo contenders please followed in 2020 and 2021 including one solo contender plea to assault with a caustic chemical in Los Angeles. In 2019 when a peaceful protest against then-President Donald Trump had formed at the Santa Monica Pier, Dempsey used bear spray on anti-Trump protesters at short range. Prosecutors said he also punched a demonstrator and hit him over the head with a skateboard. At another political protest in 2020, he sprayed an individual with pepper spray while holding them to the ground. Dempsey also hit that person with a metal bat.

Federal prosecutors are seeking a sentence of 210 to 262 months, and they note that many of Dempsey’s prior convictions were set aside under a change to California’s penal code that restores the rights of convicted felons. On Friday, prosecutors say the U.S. Probation Office recommended a revised downward sentence as a result.

But “without having seen Dempsey’s filings on these petitions in California, the government is left to guess exactly how such relief was sought, let alone granted, when Dempsey had been charged with the commission of offenses in this case August 25, 2021,” the government wrote.

Dempsey appears to have “scurried off to a California state court in an attempt to undo his atrocious criminal history because he is faced with the impending consequences of his actions on January 6,” they said.

Dempsey has not filed his proposing sentencing memorandum yet but it should be imminent. Dempsey asked for an extension on Aug. 1 to complete it by Monday and that request was granted by presiding U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth, an appointee of former President Ronald Reagan.

August 8, 2024: ‘Political violence personified:” Jan. 6 defendant gets 20 years for string of vicious attacks on Police” Politico reported.

A California man who cracked the face shield of one police officer, unloaded pepper spray on others and bludgeoned countless officers with poles, boards and even is feet was sentenced to 20 years in prison Friday, the longest sentence handed down to any participant in the violence at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

Prosecutors called David Dempsey ‘political violence personified,” and U.S. District Judge Royce Lambert agreed, saying that even on a day that “will be seared into our nation’s memory as a bloodbath,” Dempsey’s conduct was “exceptionally egregious.”

One of the more than 1,400 people charged with crimes related to the Jan. 6 attack — a violent assault by supporters of President Donald Trump seeking to prevent the transfer of power to President Joe Biden — only former Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio has been sentenced to a lengthier prison term: 22 years. But Tarrio was not present at the Capitol that day. Rather, a jury convicted him of orchestrating a plan for his Proud Boys allies to breach the Capitol and help the larger mob overwhelm police.

Dempsey’s sentence outstrips even the one handed down to Oath Keepers leader Stewart Rhodes, who was sentenced to 18 years in prison last year for similarly orchestrating a plan to violently imped the transfer of power.

Not only did Dempsey, who pleased guilty to assault, persist in his violence for hours on Jan. 6, but he also came to the Capitol with a massive rap sheet that included other instances of political violence. Throughout the riot, Dempsey placed himself at the center of the most violent episodes, particularly in the Capitol’s Lower West Terrace tunnel, the site of the most extreme violence that day. There he climbed atop other rioters to research the police line and welded wooden poles and other objects to attempt to injure them.

Several of the officers who defend the Capitol that day sat at the front of the courtroom observing the proceedings, watching silently as prosecutors recounted Dempseys intense assaults. One officer who bore the brunt of Dempsey’s attack, Sgt. Jason Mastony, describe the moment that Dempsey bashed his head with a crutch, cracking his face shield and causing a gash.

“I collapse and caught myself agains the wall as my ears rang,” Mastony said in a written statement to the court.

Prosecutors pressed Lamberth to impose a steep sentence in part because Jan. 6 was not an aberration for Dempsey. He has repeatedly gotten violent during protest and has used chemical spray to disable counterprotestors. Prosecutors played a video of Dempsey using a skateboard to assault a protester at previous rallies, with some moments of violence prompting gaps in Lamberth’s courtroom.

When it was his turn to address the judge, Dempsey described a life of destitution and abuse as the source of his violence.

“Life has been a rollercoaster of highs and lows,” Dempsey said, reading from a letter.

He described negative interactions with police as fueling some of his anger, and he apologized to the officers he attacked, saying he had been consumed by emotion. He insisted he didn’t come to Washington that day “hellbent on violence,” or to overturn an election.

Dempsey’s sentence landed with a particular impact on his family, who were present in the courtroom, including his 7-year-old daughter. After the sentencing, the young girl pranced in the hallways while her mother cried. A family member said the girl had just celebrated her birthday Thursday and isn’t “able to understand what’s going on.”

Only a handful of other Jan. 6 rioters without ties to extremist groups have faced sentences of 10 or more years. They include Peter Schwartz, who had a similarly long rap sheet and received a 14-year sentence; Daniel “D.J.” Rodriguez, who drove a taser into the neck of D.C. police officer Michael Fanone; and Thomas Webster, a retired NYPD officer who attempted to gouge the eyes of a D.C. police officer during a particularly vicious brawl.

August 9, 2024: A California man with a history of political violence was sentenced on Friday to 20 years in prison for repeatedly attacking police with flagpoles and other makeshift weapons during the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol, NPR reported.

David Nicholas Dempsey’s sentence is among the longest among hundreds of Capitol riot prosecutions. Prosecutors described him as one of the most violent members of the mob of Donald Trump supporter that attacked the Capitol as lawmakers met to certify Joe Biden’s 2020 presidential election victory.

Dempsey, who is from Van Nuys, stomped on police officers’ heads. He swung poles at officers defending a tunnel, struck an officer in the head with a metal crutch and attacked police with pepper spray and broken pieces of furniture, prosecutors said.

He climbed atop other rioters, using them like “human scaffolding” to reach officers guarding a tunnel entrance. He injured at least two police officers, prosecutors said.

“Your conduct on January 6th was exceptionally egregious,” U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth told Dempsey. “You did not get carried away in the moment.”

Dempsey pleaded guilty in January to two counts of assaulting police officers with a dangerous weapon.

Only former Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio has received a longer sentence in the Jan. 6 attack. Tarrio was sentenced to 22 years for orchestrating a plot to stop the peaceful transfer of power from Trump to Joe Biden after the 2020 presidential election.

Dempsey called his conduct “reprehensible” and apologized to the police officer whom he assaulted.

“You were performing your duties, and I responded with hostility and violence,” he said before learning his sentence.

Justice Department prosecutors recommended a prison sentence of 21 years and 10 months for Dempsey, a former construction worker and fast-food restaurant employee. Dempsey’s violence was so extreme that he attacked a fellow rioter who was trying to disarm him, prosecutors wrote.

Defense attorney Amy Collins, who sought a sentence of 6 years and six months, described the government’s sentencing recommendation as “ridiculous.”

“It makes him a statistic,” she said. “It doesn’t consider the person he is, how much he has grown.”

Dempsey was wearing a tactical vest, a helmet, and an American flag gaiter covering his face when he attacked the police at a tunnel leading to the Lower West Terrace doors. He shot pepper spray at Metropolitan Police Department Phuson Nguyen just as another rioter yanked the officer’s gas mask, prosecutors wrote.

“The searing spray burned Detective Nyugen’s lungs, throat, eyes, and face and left him gasping for breath, fearing he might lose consciousness and be overwhelmed by the mob,” they wrote.

“I collapsed and caught myself against the wall as my ears rang. I was able to stand again and hold the line for a few more minutes until another assault by rioters pushed the police line back away from the threshold of the tunnel,”

Dempsey has been jailed since his arrest in August 2021.

Dempsey had a history of political violence

His criminal record in California includes convictions for burglary, theft and assault. The assault conviction stemmed from an October 2918, gathering near the Santa Monica Pier, where Dempsey attacked people peacefully demonstrating against then-President Trump, prosecutors said.

“The peaceful protest turned violent as Dempsey took a canister of bear spray from his pants and dispersed it at close range against several protestors,” they wrote, noting that Dempsey was sentenced to 200 days of jail time.

Dempsey engaged in at least three other acts of “vicious political violence” that didn’t led to criminal charges “for various reasons,” according to prosecutors. They said Dempsey struck a counter-protester over the head with a skateboard at a June 2019 rally in Los Angeles, used the same skateboard to assault someone at an August 2020 protest in Tujunga, California, and attacked a protester with pepper spray and a metal bat during a August 2020 protest in Beverly Hills, California.

More than 1,400 people have been charged with Jan. 6-related federal crimes. Over 900 of them have been convicted and sentenced, with roughly two-thirds reviewing terms of imprisonment ranging from a few days to the 22 years that Tarrio received.

August 9, 2024: United States Attorney’s Office District of Columbia posted: “California Man Sentenced for Assaulting Law Enforcement with a Dangerous Weapon During Jan. 6 Capitol Breach”

A California man was sentenced to prison today after previously pleading guilty to assaulting law enforcement with a dangerous weapon during the Jan. 6 2021, breach of the U.S. Capitol. His actions and the actions of others disrupted a joint session of the U.S. Congress convened to ascertain and count the electoral votes related to the 2020 presidential election.

David Dempsey, 37, of Santa Ana, California, was sentenced to 240 months in prison, 36 months of supervised release, and ordered to pay $2,000 in restitution by U.S. District Judge Royce C. Lamberth. Dempsey previously pleaded guilty to two felony counts of assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers with a deadly or dangerous weapon on Jan. 4, 2024.

According to court documents, Dempsey traveled to Washington, D.C., with others from his home in California and, on the morning of Jan. 6, 2021, attended the “Stop the Steal” rally at the Ellipse. Dempsey was later interviewed standing near a wooden structure representing a hanging gallows, which was fitted with a noose and a sign stating, “This is Art.” Dempsey wore a black helmet, vest, sunglasses, and an American flag gaiter covering his neck, mouth, and nose.

During the interview, Dempsey was asked what he thought of this “work of art” (the gallows), to which he replied, in part: “This isn’t just art. This is necessary” and “Them worthless f—s–holes like f — Jerry Nadler, f — Pelosi, uh Clapper, Comey, f– all those pieces of garbage, you know Obama, all these dudes, Clinton — all these pieces of s –. That’s what they need. They don’t need a jail cell. They need to hang from these m — f– while everybody videotapes it and f— spreads it on YouTube, B — Tube or whatever social f– social media there is.”

Later, Dempsey walked with others towards the U.S. Capitol building and made his way to the Lower West Terrace Tunnel, the site of some of the most violent attacks against law enforcement on January 6th. Here, Dempsey joined the crowd, pushing into a line of police officers defending the Tunnel.

At about 3:36 p.m., Dempsey climbed atop other rioters’ shoulders, arms and backs to get to the front line. Upon reading the front, Dempsey threw a short pole-like object into the Tunnel, striking a police officer. Dempsey shouted, “F — you b — ass cops.” Dempsey then grabbed onto a police riot shield and continued to yell insults at police.

At approximately 3:57 p.m., Dempsey attempted to throw a flagpole at officers in the Tunnel, but his throw was inadvertently blocked by a police riot shield held by another rioter. He then grabbed onto an officer’s baton and attempted to pull it away. At about 3:59 p.m., Dempsey, using the Tunnel’s wooden frame as support, kicked the shields of law enforcement officers four times.

At about 4:01 p.m., Dempsey took a long pole from the crowd and swung it at officers in the Tunnel, striking their shields. He then used his foot push away a crowd member attempting to take the pole away from him. Court Documents say that a short while later, at about 4:07 p.m., Dempsey sprayed two separate bursts of pepper spray into the line of officers.

For the next several minutes, Dempsey continued his assault on officers in the Tunnel including by throwing water bottles at police, spraying pepper spray at officers, swinging a metal crutch, which struck police; swinging an aluminum people, which also struck police; through a folded-up metal pole; and swinging and throwing a long wooden pole, which struck police.

At about 4:42 p.m., Dempsey retreated from the crowd to rinse paper spray from his eyes and face. He then returned to the front line and swung a flagpole at the line of officers, striking an officer’s riot shield. Finally, at 5:03 p.m., Dempsey threw two objects at officers in the Tunnel.

The FBI arrested Dempsey on Aug. 26, 2021, in California.


Actor Jay Johnston of ‘Bob’s Burgers’ and other comedies pleads guilty in Jan. 6 case.

July 9, 2024: Actor Jay Johnson, known for his roles in Arrested Development, Bob’s Burgers and other TV and film comedies, has pleaded guilty to a felony charge over his role in the Jan. 6, 2021, breach of the U.S. Capitol by a pro-Trump mob. NPR reported.

Johnston, 55, was arrested in June of last year, charged with a felony count of interfering with law enforcement officers during civil disorder and several misdemeanors. He pleaded guilty on Monday to the felony civil disorder charge before U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols — who is scheduled to sentence Johnston on Oct. 7.

On eyewitness video, Johnson, who stands well over 6 feet, initially seen filming protestors confronting police at a barricade as Congress met to consider electoral votes from the presidential election that resulted in former President Donald Trump’s loss.

As the protest escalated into an assault on the Capitol and lawmakers were forced to evacuate their chambers, the FBI said in an affidavit, Johnston joined a mass of people in a tunnel leading inside the building, where he used a stolen U.S. Capitol police riot shield to help shove police officer backward toward a door.

“This was the site of some of the most violent attacks against law enforcement that day,” the Justice Department said as it announced the guilty plea.

In the weeks after Jan. 6, authorities knew Johnston only as individual 247-AFO, a tall man in a black jacket wearing a camouflage neck gaiter — which he sometimes lifted above his nose, in an apparent attempt to conceal his identity. After the FBI published images of the person and asked the public to help identify him, the actor’s lawyer contacted the FBI National Threat Operations Center. Johnston was arrested in June 2023, after surrendering himself at the FBI Los Angeles field office.

Investigators said at least two other pieces of evidence helped link Johnston to the crime: he booked a three-night trip to Washington, D.C., returning to Los Angles on Jan. 7; and he texted a friend about his experience.

“The news has presented it as an attack. It actually wasn’t. Thought it kind of turned into that. It was a mess. Got maced and tear gassed and I found it quite untasted,” Johnston wrote in that text, which the FBI said it acquired from “three current or former associates” of the actor.

In his acting career, Johnson was a regular on the 1990’s HBO comedy Mr. Show with Bob and David and appeared in Anchorman to The Sarah Silverman Program and Men in Black II. But after his actions against police in 2021, the long-running Bob’s Burgers show cut ties with Johnston. Last fall, another actor replaced him as the voice of Italian restaurant owner Jimmy Pesto Sr. according to the Collider website.

The Justice Department said it has now filed charges against more than 1,450 people in dozens of states for their role in the deadly attack on the Capitol. Of that number, more than 880 have pleaded guilty and only three have been acquitted of all charges.

October 29, 2024: NPR posted: “Former ‘Bob’s Burgers’ actor sentenced to 1 year in prison for role in Capitol riot.”

An actor known for his roles in the television comedies Bob’s Burgers and Arrested Development was sentenced on Monday to one year in prison for his part in a mob’s attack on the U.S. Capitol nearly four years ago.

Jay Johnston, 56, of Los Angeles, joined other rioters in a “heave ho” push against police officers guarding a tunnel entrance to the Capitol during the Jan. 6 riot. Johnston also cracked jokes and interacted with other rioters as he used a cellphone to record the violence around him, prosecutors said.

Johnston expressed regret that he “made it more difficult for the police to do their job” on Jan. 6. He said he would never have guessed that a riot would erupt that day.

“That was because of my own ignorance, I believe,” he told U.S. District Judge Curt Nichols. “If I had been more political, I could have seen that coming, perhaps.”

The judge, who sentenced Johnston to one year and one day of imprisonment, allowed him to remain free after the hearing and report to prison at a date to be determined. Nichols said he recognizes that Johnston will miss out on caring for his 13-year-old autistic daughter while he is behind bars.

“But his conduct on January 6th was quite problematic. Reprehensible, really,” the judge said.

Johnston pleaded guilty in July to interfering with police officers during a civil disorder, a felony punishable by a maximum prison sentence of five years.

Prosecutors recommended an 18-month prison sentence for Johnston. Their sentencing memo includes a photograph of a smiling Johnston dressed as Jacob Chansley, the spear-carrying Capitol Rioter known as the “QAnon Shaman,” at a Halloween party roughly two years after the siege.

“He thinks his participation in one of the most serious crimes against our democracy is a joke,” prosecutors wrote.

Johnston played pizzeria owner Jimmy Pesto Sr. in Bob’s Burgers, a police officer in Arrested Development, and a street-brawling newsman in the movie Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgundy. Johnston also appeared on Mr. Show with Bob and David, an HBO sketch comedy series that starred Bob Odenkirk and David Cross.

Johnston, a Chicago native, moved to Los Angeles in 1993 to pursue an acting career. After the riot, Johnston was fired by the creator of Bob’s Burgers, lost a role in a move based on the show and has “essentially been blacklisted” in Hollywood, said defense attorney Stanley Woodward.

“Instead, Mr. Johnston has worked as a handyman for the last two years — an obvious far cry from his actual expertise and livelihood in film and television,” Woodword wrote.

Woodward accused the government of exaggerating Johnston’s riot participation “because he is an acclaimed Hollywood actor.”

Johnston attended then-President Donald Trump’s “Stop the Steal” rally near the White House on Jan. 6 before he marched to the Capitol. He used a metal bike rack to scale a stone wall to reach the Capitol’s West Plaza before making his way to the mouth of a tunnel entrance that police were guarding on the Lower West Terrace.

“When he was under the archway, he turned and waved to other rioters, beckoning them to join him in fighting the police,” prosecutors wrote.

Entering the tunnel, Johnston helped other rioters flush chemical irritants out of their eyes. Another rioter gave him a stolen police shield, which he handed up closer to the police line. Johnston the joined other rioters in a “heave ho” push against police in the tunnel, a collective effort that crushed an officer against a doorframe, prosecutors said.

Johnston recorded himself cracking a joke as rioters pushed an orange ladder toward police in the tunnel saying, “We’re going to get those light bulbs fixed!”

A day after the riot, in a text message to an acquaintance, Johnston acknowledged being in the Capitol on Jan. 6.

“The news has presented it as an attack. It actually wasn’t. Thought it kind of turned into that. It was a mess, Johnston wrote.

FBI agents seized Johnston’s cellphone when they searched his California home in June 2021.

More than 1,500 people have been charged with Capitol riot-related federal crimes. Over 1,000 rioters have been convicted and sentenced. Roughly 650 of them received prison time ranging from a few days to 22 years.

November 5, 2023: Collider posted: ‘Bob’s Burgers’ Finds Replacement for Disgraced Jimmy Pesto Voice Actor”

Bob Belcher’s nemesis, Jimmy Pesto, has returned to Bob’s Burgers – but without his now discarded initial voice actor, Eric Bauza has replaced Jay Johnston as the voice of the unscrupulous Italian restauranteur. ComicBook.com reports that Bauza appeared as Pesto on “Bully-ieve It or Not,” the fifth episode of the animated sitcom’s fourteenth season. Pesto had not appeared since season 11’s “Bridge Over Troubled Rudy,” which aired in 2021, shortly before Johnston’s legal troubles began.

Johnston, a veteran of Mr. Show and Arrested Development, was one of the participants in the January 6, 2021 Capitol riot, in which supporters of Donald Trump’s false claims that he’d done the 2020 Presidential election stormed the US Capitol, causing death and destruction. Johnston was subsequently fired from the show, and was formerly charged with a number of offenses relating to the riot earlier this year.

This is the second time this year that Bauza had replaced a fired voice actor. He also took over from the disgraced Justin Roiland as the voice of Chris the Red Goobler on this season of Solar Opposites, as well.

  • Eric Bauza has replaced Jay Johnston as the voice of Jimmy Pesto in Bob’s Burgers due to Johnston’s involvement in the Capitol riot.
  • This is not the first time Bauza has replaced a fired voice actor, as he also took over from Justin Roiland in Solar Opposites.
  • Outside of his role in Bob’s Burgers, Bauza has voiced iconic characters such as Bugs Bunny, Daffy Duck, and Luke Skywalker in various animated productions.
Trump Lawsuits 0 comments on Insurrectionists Are Facing Consequences — Part 10

Insurrectionists Are Facing Consequences — Part 10

Image by maz-Alph from Pixabay

Those who attacked their own nation’s Capitol failed to consider the consequences of doing so. This is part 10.

On January 6, 2021, a mob of Donald Trump supporters staged an insurrection at the U.S. Capitol building. The Guardian reported that people stormed the chambers of the House and Senate while the Electoral College votes were being tallied.


January 5, 2021: NBC News reported: “Trump leans harder on Pence to flip election results, even though he lacks that power” It was written by Shannon Pettypiece, Monica Alba, Alex Moe, and Kristen Welker

President Donald Trump turned up the pressure Tuesday to enlist Vice President Mike Pence in a futile effort to reverse the presidential election and keep them in office for four more years.

With a president who has excelled at remaining the focus of Washington, Pence has largely played the role of quiet support character, never publicly rebuking his boss and sticking to his script with unwavering consistency.

But Trump’s effort to keep from being evicted from the White House on Jan. 20 has pushed Pence into the limelight and left him in a position that a person close to Trump said he is “dreading.”

Pence has a constitutional role in officially making President-elect Joe Biden the commander-in-chief. On Wednesday, he will be responsible for overseeing Congress’s count of the Electoral College votes submitted by the states. A group of Republican lawmakers have announced that they plan to object, although they are unlikely to succeed in throwing out the Biden votes.

But Trump wants Pence, who will oversee the vote count, to simply reject the votes for Biden, a power he doesn’t have under the Constitution and federal law. Trump tweeted falsely Monday that “the Vice President has the power to reject fraudulently chosen electors.” And during a rally Monday in Georgia, he told supporters, “I hope Mike Pence comes through for us.”

No vice president has that power. The position’s role in the electoral count process is essentially limited by the Constitution and federal law to simply opening the slates of electors from each state and reading them.

Pence and Trump had lunch together Tuesday, two administration officials said. The New York Times reported that Pence told Trump during their meeting that he did not believe he had the power to block congressional certification. Pence’s office didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment, but Trump’s campaign later put out a statement refuting the Times’ account and making false claims about what Pence can do in his role over the proceedings.

Maintaining order

Those close to Pence say they don’t expect any surprises.

Pence intends to act as a moderator, fulfilling his duties as president of the Senate, the sources said. They don’t expect him to take any actions to influence the outcome aside from letting members who raise objections carry out debates over the results as outlined in the rule. Pence thinks it is his job to follow the Constitution and the law, a person close to him said.

Pence has been “diligent about how he’s approached tomorrow,” a source said. He’s been “studious,” according to the official close to Pence, reviewing the federal Electoral Count Act, reading legal opinions, meeting with his chief of staff and his general counsel and speaking to experts on the subject matter.

“Vice President Pence shares the concerns of millions of Americans about voter fraud and irregularities in the last election,” Pence’s chief of staff, Marc Short, said in a statement over the weekend. “The vice president welcomes the efforts of members of the House and Senate to use the authority they have under the law to raise objections and bring forward evidence before the Congress and the American people on January 6th.”

In recent days, Pence has met with the Senate parliamentarian to go over the process and logistics, Short said. Pence scrapped a trip that had been in the planning stages to travel to Europe and the Middle East immediately after the congressional certification, people familiar with the discussions said.

Trump met with Pence in the Oval Office on Monday evening shortly before he left for his Georgia rally, where he called on Pence to overturn the results. Pence was back a the White House on Tuesday afternoon, with a Covid-19 task force meeting as the only activity on his schedule.

If Pence follows precedent and the rules laid out by Congress, his role will amount to reading the results once they are finalized, and “maintaining order” — a bit of jargon that generally means keeping the chamber quiet.

While more than a dozen Republican senators have said they will question the results in swing states won by Biden and dozens of House members plan to challenge the results, there aren’t enough votes in either chamber to overturn the outcome.

Still Trump’s allies have pushed for Pence to use his position to focus lawmakers to accept Trump’s votes instead of Biden electors.

A lawyer for an alternative slate of delegates said Tuesday that a letter would be sent Tuesday signed by 75 lawyers representing alternative slates of electors — none of which have been certified by any state governments — urging Pence to delay the vote count to give the states more time to resolve any disputes.

But legal experts said any such move would violate the Electoral Count Act, which says Congress must count the votes on Jan. 6. Pence has no authority to change the date.

The National Archives, which is responsible by law for receiving all of the certified results from states, received alternative slates from Republicans in five states — Arizona, Georgia, New Mexico, Nevada and Pennsylvania. But the archives considered them as being “submitted by private individuals.”

The federal Electoral Count Act prohibits the archives from forwarding the alternative slates to Congress, because it can pass along only slates certified by the states.

The archives provided the information in response to a Freedom of Information Act request submitted by NBC News.

Pence’s office declined to comment about whether it has reviewed alternative slates of electors from any contested states, nor would it comment about what it plans to do with them.

‘Whatever reputation he has’

Pence has his own political future to consider.

As a potential 2024 presidential candidate, Pence doesn’t want to be in his current position, those close to him say.

If Pence breaks with Trump, he risks alienating Trump’s supporters. If he tries in any way to block the results, he could alienate independents and moderate Republicans who disagree with Trump’s behavior.

“He’s hoping he can get through it without incurring wrath from Trump and keeping intact whatever reputation he has,” a person close to Trump said Monday.

A person close to Pence said that while he and his advisors understand that there will be political implication to whatever he does, they see it as a no-win situation and haven’t been trying to find a way to use it to score political points.

Pence is doing everything possible to “appear as loyal as ever” without “destroying his future,” said a person familiar with his discussions.

While the vote count is being readied, Trump will be holding a campaign-style rally outside the White House intended to stop the vote certification with false claims of widespread election fraud.

January 5, 2021: NBC News posted: “Fact check: No, Pence can’t overturn the election results” It was written by Jane C. Timm.

President Donald Trump claimed Tuesday that Vice President Mike Pence could single-handedly reject certain electors during Congress’ Electoral College certification process, turning up the pressure on him to help overturn the results of the election.

“The Vice President has the power to reject fraudulently chosen electors,” Trump tweeted.

This is false.

Pence, in his role as president of the Senate, is scheduled to preside over Congress’ certification of the results Wednesday, as detailed by the 12th Amendment. But he can’t intervene in the process.

The law governing the certification process, the Electoral Count Act of 1887, specifically limits the power of the president of the Senate precisely because a president of the Senate had intervened in the count previously. In 1857, after James Buchanan’s win, the Senate president overruled an objection against Wisconsin electors who had been delayed in their certification process by a snowstorm in 1856.

“One of the points of the Electoral Count Act is to constrain the vice president given this earlier episode and make it clear he’s a presider, not a decider,” said former Federal Election Commission Commission Chairman Trevor Potter, president of the Campaign Legal Center.

The Electoral Count Act, Potter said, offers a detailed playbook for how Congress counting is supposed to go, and it specifically limits the vice president to ceremonial duties.

“It says the vice president shall preside and he shall ensure that the certification and votes from the states are opened and read out,” Potter said.

Trump and his supporters have spent months trying to cast doubt on and overturn the results of the election. Biden, who won the Electoral College vote by 306-232, will be sworn in as 46th president on Jan. 20.

Trump’s campaign and supporters have filed dozens of suits, only to be swatted down for lack of evidence or standing.

A federal district court in Washington recently ruled against a last-ditch effort suit by Trump supporters against Pence, Congress and the Electoral College that sought to stop the certification of Biden’s win.

The plaintiffs’ theory “lies somewhere between a willful mistreating of the Constitution and fantasy,” a judge ruled Monday, denying the motion.

Trump has also rallied Republican members to object to the certification in Congress even though the effort is certainly doomed to fail — both chambers must agree to toss out a state’s slate of electors, and Democrats control the House.

Potter said that if Pence did try to disregard the law and intervene, he’d have to argue that the Electoral College Act was unconstitutional in some way.

“Which any historian would tell you is nuts,” Peter said. “No one ever intended the vice president to be the kingmaker.”

January 5, 2021: NBC News posted: “Ossoff declares victory in Senate race that’s still too close to call” It was written by Rebecca Shabad.

Ossoff declared victory in a live video statement at 8 a.m. ET Wednesday against his race against Republican David Perdue whose Senate term expired over the weekend and who ran for reelection.

NBC News projects that the race is too close to call. With 98 percent of the vote in, Ossoff leads by 0.4 percentage point.

“It is with humility that I thank the people of Georgia, for electing me to serve you in the United States Senate, thank you for the confidence and trust that you have placed in me,” Ossoff said.

“I am honored by your support, by your confidence by your trust, and I will look forward to serving you in the United States Senate with integrity and humility, without honor and getting things done for the people of Georgia,” he added.

A number of streets have been blocked off throughout the nation’s capitol, and D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser has called in the National guard as a precaution.

January 5, 2021: NBC News posted: “Trump to address D.C. rally where 30,000 people are expected” It was written by Rebecca Shabad and Monica Alba

Ahead of the counting of the Electoral votes on Capitol Hill, Trump plans to address a “Save America Rally” in downtown Washington at 11 a.m. ET.

A National Park Service spokesman told NBC News that organizers expect as many as 30,000 people at the event near the White House. The permit originally was submitted for a crowd size of 10,000, but the group had tripled its estimate based on responses and people already in the D.C. area as of Tuesday, according to the official.

“It’s going to be a big couple of days, but this is literally going to be his last gasp,” the Trump ally said of Wednesday’s proceedings, which could drag into Thursday. “There’s not anything he can latch not to after this.

January 5, 2021: NBC News posted: “DC Police make several arrests ahead of major pro-Trump protest” It was written by Allan Smith.

Several people were arrested in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday in connection to protests ahead of Congress’ certification of the Electoral College votes on Wednesday.

Washington D.C. Metropolitan Police said six arrests were made as of 9 p.m. ET, including some involving multiple charges. Those charges includes a handful that were weapons-related, including carrying firearms without a license, possession of unregistered ammunition and possession of an unregistered firearm. Protesters were also charged with assaulting a police officer and simple assault.

Tuesday’s rallies in support of President Donald Trump, who refuses to accept his November electoral loss to President-elect Biden, featured an array of conservative speakers and drew in throngs of Trump supporters who traveled to the nation’s capital ahead of Wednesday’s proceedings.

Though the formal events ended earlier Tuesday, protesters remained out in the street well into the night, with videos on social media showing some clashing with the police.

The main draw will take place Wednesday morning ahead of the congressional gathering, where the president himself will address a protest outside the White House dubbed “March for Trump/Save America” rally. Thousands are expected to attend that event, which was organized by the pro-Trump Women for American First.

The president has made a slew of unsuccessful efforts to overturn his loss both through lawsuits and attempts to convict state legislators to ignore their vote in their states and appoint pro-Trump electors. As his final Hail Mary, the president has sought to rev his supporters up over the Jan. 6 certification, claiming that it presents the opportunity for Congress to overturn the election. With Democrats in control of the House and dozens of GOP senators opposing the effort, that plot is doomed to fail as well.

The president has also turned up the heat on Vice President Mike Pence, who will preside over the ceremony, claiming he can intervene in the count. But the ceremonial role does not provide Pence with such powers.

Still, Trump’s most ardent supporters heeded his call. In anticipation of possible violence, Washington D.C., Mayor Muriel Bowser mobilized the National Guard and increased police presence.

January 6, 2021: NBC News reported: ‘Do it Mike’: Trump encourages Pence to overturn election — which he can’t do” It was written by Rebecca Shabad.

Trump tweeted Wednesday morning to urge Pence to try to overturn Biden’s victory in the 2020 presidential election when he counts the Electoral College votes in Congress later that day.

Pence, however, has no power to do that. Biden will become president on Jan. 20.

“All Mike Pence has to do is send them back to the States, AND WE WIN. Do it Mike, this is a time for extreme courage,” he tweeted. Again, Pence can’t do that.

January 5, 2021: NBC News reported: “Congress is set to count the Trump-Biden Electoral College votes. Here’s the lowdown.” It was written by Dareh Gregorian.

It’s the final step leading to the inauguration the next president of the United States, but the Electoral College vote count in Congress on Wednesday is expected to be a much longer — and more contentious – affair than normal.

Verifying the vote count is constitutionally required, but it has become largely procedural — electors officially cast their votes on Dec. 14, and Joe Biden defeated President Donald Trump by 306-232, a result Trump referred to as a “landslide” when he won with the same numbers in 2016. Unlike Trump then, Biden also won the popular vote, garnering 7 million more votes than Trump.

Some Republican lawmakers plan to use the congressional vote count to object to Biden’s wins in numerous swing states in a Hail Mary-type bid to keep Trump in the White House. The objections are expected to fail, but they could turn the typically short ceremony into an hours- or even days-long event.

Here’s what to expect.

What’s supposed to happen?

Under federal law, Jan. 6 is the date Electoral Collage votes determining the next president are counted in a joint session of Congress beginning at 1 p.m. ET.

The process over the president of the Senate — in this case, Vice President Mike Pence.

The vice president opens the states’ sealed certificate in alphabetical order and hands them to one of four “tellers” — a Republican and a Democrat from each chamber of Congress who review the certificates and announce the states’ votes.

The process continues uninterrupted until all the votes are announced and counted — unless there’s a recognized objection.

Which objections are recognized?

For an objection to a state’s vote to be considered, it has to be a written document signed by at least one member of the House and one from the Senate.

An objection to a state’s entire slate of electors has been raised only once, since the Electoral Count Act was enacted in 1887. That’s expected to happen again Wednesday — a dozen Republican House members have said they plan to object to votes from swing states won by Biden, and Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., announced last week that he planned to join at least some of the challenges.

On Saturday, 11 more GOP senators said they would vote to sustain objections in six swing states unless there’s a 10-day audit to review vote that have already been certified after canvasses, audits and/or recounts. There’s been no movement toward such an audit.

What happens then?

If there’s a recognized objection to a state’s vote, the vote counting is halted while both chambers go their separate ways and have up to two hours of debate on it. They then vote on whether to sustain the objection and dismiss the state’s votes.

For a state’s vote to be dismissed — something that hasn’t happened since the Electoral Count Act was passed over 130 years ago — majority of both houses have to vote to sustain the objection. If one chamber votes to toss the state’s votes and the other doesn’t, the objection is dismissed.

After the objection is voted on, the joint congressional session reconvenes and continues with the count. If there’s another formal objection to a different state’s vote, the process is repeated.

In 2005, an objection to Ohios electors and the vote on the objection took almost three hours. If Trump allies do challenge the vote in all six states targeted this time — Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin — the vote count could easily go into Thursday.

Why are the objections likely to fail?

The Democrats have majority control of the House, and they are expected to be unified against an objection to any state’s vote. While that alone would be enough to defeat a formal objection, the Senate isn’t likely to vote in favor of an objection, either.

Republicans have a slim majority in the Senate, and a number of GOP senators have spoken out against throwing out any state’s votes.

“I think the thing they’ve got to remember it is not just going anywhere. I mean the Senate, it would go down like a shot dog,” Sen. John Thune, R.S.D., told reporters last month.

Further dampening the momentum is that there’s been no evidence of any widespread fraud, despite wild claims by Trump and his allies that he actually won the swing states that Biden won because the election was “rigged” by vote-switching machines, dead voters, phony ballots, and improper rule changes. Election officials have conducted recounts and audits in many of the states Trump complained about, and federal and state officials and federal and state courts have found no evidence of any widespread fraud; they have repeatedly debunked Trump allies’ claims, conjectures and flawed legal theories.

A handful of fraud cases have been uncovered in key states — in Pennsylvania, three Republicans have been charged with illegally voting for Trump — but nothing large-scale that comes close to Biden’s margin of victory in those states.

What’s happened before?

Hawley and the Republican senators who plan to uphold the objections say they’re following Democrats’ precedent, but the scope of what they’re doing is wholly unprecedented.

The only time a senator has joined with a House member to object to a state’s entire slate of electors was in 2005, when Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., and Rep Stephanie Tubbs Jones – D-Ohio, objected to Ohio’s votes, charging that there had been voter suppression because of long lines and missing voting machines in minority areas. The move, which theoretically could have changed the outcome of the election, wasn’t supported by the defeated Democratic nominee John Kerry, and it failed in the Senate by a vote of 74-1 and in the House by a vote of 267-31.

In 2001, over a dozen House members tried to object to the vote in Florida, which Vice President Al Gore lost to George W. Bush by a razor-thin margin after a Supreme Court ruling decided the election. Gore, acting as the president of the Senate, ruled their objections out of order and concluded the ceremony by saying, “May God bless our new president and new vice president, and may God bless the United States of America.”

During the certification of 2016 election results, several House Democrats tried to object to the votes in a numerical of states, but they were ruled out of order by Biden, then the vice president, who noted that no senators had joined in their objections.

What if objections are sustained?

Even though it’s highly unlikely that any state’s vote will be rejected, some Trump allies hope that multiple states’ electors will be tossed out, bringing Biden below the 270 electoral vote threshold to win. If all six challenges were to succeed, Biden would lose 79 electoral votes. If Biden’s total were to go below 270, it could be up to the House to select the next president.

Under the 12th Amendment to the Constitution, each state congressional delegation gets one vote — and while Democrats make up a majority of House members, the GOP controls the majority of state delegations, which would open the door to Trump’s being “elected.”

Trump is pushing for this unrealistic scenario, as well — he has called for his supporters to gather in Washington on Wednesday to show their support, and in an extraordinary phone call Saturday he asked Georgia’s Secretary of State to “find” him the number of votes he’d need to win the state, even though its vote has already been verified.

What else could Republicans try?

Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas, sued in late December arguing essentially that Pence has the power to pick which states’ votes and electors are counted. The Justice Department replied to the suit on Pence’s behalf, arguing that Gohmert should sue Congress, not the vice president. Lawyers for the House contended that the suit should be thrown out for a number of reasons, calling it a “belated and disruptive effort to impose a novel legal rule.”

Gohmert’s suit was dismissed Friday, and his appeal was tossed out Saturday.

Trump is still calling on Pence to take action, even though the Constitution only defines his role as opening the certificate while the Electoral Count Act says he additionally presides over the proceedings and announces the final tally.

“I hope Mike Pence comes through for us, I have to tell you,” Trump said at a rally in Georgia on Monday night. “I hope that our great vice president comes through for us. He’s a great guy. Of course, if he doesn’t come through, I won’t like him quite as much.”

On Tuesday morning, Trump went further, claiming incorrectly that Pence has the ability to pick and choose electors, tweeting, “The Vice President has the power to reject fraudulently chosen electors.”

Will this end Trump’s challenges?

No. While the verification of the count would put the final nail in the coffin for Trump’s legal challenges, he has legal actions still technically pending, and he has given no indication that he would drop them or concede. Whenever his fraud allegations have been debunked, he and his allies come up with new ones, and to date none have been found to have any merit.

Biden, meanwhile, will be sworn in as the 46th president on Jan. 20.

January 5, 2021: NBC News posted: “Fact check: Trump falsely suggests improper ‘voter dump’ as count continues in Georgia” It was written by Jane C. Timm.

While the nation waited for the results in Georgia’s Senate runoff elections, President Donald Trump on Tuesday wrongly suggested that the normal process of counting votes was a sign of fraud.

“Looks like they are setting up a big ‘voter dump’ against the Republican candidates. Waiting to see how many votes they need?” he tweeted.

His tweet came as state election officials announced that a large number of early, in person vote would soon be reported in Dekalb County, which includes part of Atlanta, hours after polls had closed. Those votes were expected to break heavily for the Democratic candidates, and did so, according to the county results reported after 11 p.m. ET.

“Just happened to have found another 4000 ballots from Fulton County. Here we go!” he added later.

Trump has repeatedly ignored the facts when it comes to regular election process, falsely claiming that he was denied a second term in part because of surprise spikes in votes for President-elect Joe Biden, and officials in multiple states from both political parties have sought to counter this misinformation. Election results are always reported in batches, and large cities can sometimes take longer to count and report.

After polls closed Tuesday, election officials like Gabriel Sterling, the voting system implementation manager, gave regular updates on outstanding ballots and urged patience.

“It’s as easy as this: counting election results doesn’t scale perfectly proportionately. Big counties have more ballots, and often take longer,” said Justin Levitt, an election law expert and professor at Loyola Law School who worked at the Department of Justice during the Obama administration on voting issues.

In a text, Levitt added that waiting on results was entirely predictable after the nail-biter race in November. “There’s NOTHING weird about waiting for election results are close.”

Trump has repeatedly and falsely claimed that Democratic cities, particularly those with large shares of Black voters, have orchestrated election-stealing voter fraud, and his attorneys have advanced broad conspiracy theories involving foreign communists. There isn’t a shred of evidence of this claims, and lawsuits alleging such baseless theories have been thrown out of court after court.

With the races still too close to call, Trump amplified suggestions of impropriety from allies on Twitter.

“Why are they stopping the vote count in Democrat Chatham County, Georgia? This sounds familiar!” Kayleigh McEnnany, the White House press secretary, tweeted from her personal account, earning a retweet from the president.

Sterling tweeted an explanation.

“Chatham County didn’t just stop. They completed the counting of everything they have in. That includes Election Day, Advanced & all of the absentees they had in. The last left will be the absentee by mail that came in today” he said.

Tomi Lauren, a conservative commentator, earned retweets from the president when she told Democrats were “scrounging up votes from mystical places again,” and later posted “I wonder when the water main is gonna burst in Georgia…”

The reference to a water main break is part of another debunked conspiracy theory advanced by the president. There as no water main break and surveillance footage shows there were no planted ballots, a Trump has repeatedly alleged.

Both races were neck-and-neck as of 12:55 a.m. Wednesday, through Democrat Raphael Warnock leads Republican Sen. Kelly Loeffeler, according to NBC News.

The other race is tighter, with former Republican Sen. David Perdue outperforming Loeffler against Democrat Jon Ossoff.

Biden, speaking in Delaware on Wednesday afternoon, described the events at the Capitol that disrupted the vote count as “chaos” that “borders on sedition.”

January 6, 2021: NBC News posted: “Warnock celebrates Senate victory: Georgia voters ‘heard a very clear contrast’ It was written by Rebecca Shabad.

Democrat Raphael Warnock celebrated his victory Wednesday morning in his special Senate runoff election against Georgia Republican Sen. Kelly Loeffler.

“I can’t tell you how honored I am that the people of my home state where I was born and raised and educated at Morehouse College have decided to send me to the United States Senate to represent their concerns at this defining moment in American history [at] a time when people are suffering in so many ways,” Warnock said in an interview on NBC’s “TODAY” show.

Warnock said that the people of Georgia heard a “very clear contrast” in the race.

Addressing the country’s divisiveness, Warnock, a reverend, said that he has experience bringing people together across racial and religious lines on a range of issues such as voting rights and criminal justice reform.

Warnock noted that people have been waiting for economic relief for months, and Congress was unable to pass $2,000 direct checks in the latest aid package.

January 6, 2021: NBC News posted: “Sen. James Lankford says he plans to object to at least Arizona’s electoral vote count” It was written by Rebecca Shabad.

Sen. James Lankford, R-Okla., told reporters Wednesday that he plans to object to the counting of Arizona’s electoral votes for Biden when Congress counts them starting at 1. p.m, ET.

Reporters on Capitol Hill asked if he had decided which states he planned to object to, and Lankford said, “I have, yeah. We’ll start with Arizona. So we’ll let that go from there.”

Lankford, who faces re-election in 2022, said there’s a possibility he might object to more states as well.

GOP Sens. Ted Cruz of Texas, Mike Braun of Indiana and Tommy Tuberville of Alabama also plan to object to at least Arizona.

“We are not a cult. We’re not like, OK, there’s one person who leads our party,” Senator Bill Cassidy of Louisiana said on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” “If we have a sitting president, she or he will be the leader of our party.”

Senator Tom Cotton of Arkansas, appearing on CBS’s “Face the Nation,” made almost identical remarks. “When any party is out of power, as Republicans are now, we don’t have a single leader,” Mr. Cotton said, suggesting Mr. DeSantis, Gov. Brian Kemp of Georgia, Gov. Glen Youngkin of Virginia, Senator Tim Scott of South Carolina and himself as other leaders.

The sentiment was not universal. On “Fox News Sunday,” Representative Jim Banks of Indiana argues that Mr. Trump should stay at the helm of the party, saying, “Remember, when he was on the ballot in 2016 and 2020, we won a lot more seats than when he wasn’t on the ballot in 2018 and 2022.” (That is not quite true — Republicans are on track to win more total House seats this year in 2020 — but their 2020 candidates did flip more Democratic-held seats and did better in relation to pre-election expectations.)

But the shifting ground was clear.

Gov. Chris Sununu of New Hampshire, who has often distanced himself from Mr. Trump but also endorsed his state’s Trump-aligned House and Senate candidates, argued before the election that voters would prioritize the economy over threats to democracy. On Sunday, he acknowledged that they appeared not to have done so.

“I don’t think anyone likes the policies out of D.C.,” Mr. Sununu said on ABC’s “This Week.” “No one likes paying six bucks for a gallon of heating oil, especially with winter coming. But what I think people said was, look, we can work on these policies later, but as Americans, we’ve got to fix extremism right now.”

Larry Hogan, the departing governor of Maryland and an outspoken anti-Trump Republican, hinted on CNN’s “State of the Union” that he might run for the Republican presidential nomination in 2024, and suggested that he saw this as less quixotic than before the midterms.

“I have been saying since 2020 that we have to get back to a party that appeals to more people, that can win in tough places like I’ve done in Maryland, and I think that lane is much wider now than it was a week ago,” he said.

Here’s what else happened on the Sunday shows.

Democrats took a victory lap.

Though control of the House remains up in the air, with Republicans favored to take a slim majority, Democrats expressed jubilance — at holding the Senate, at winning many state-level races and at still having a chance, if a small one, to hold the House.

Democratic candidates “rejected calls from Washington about, oh, your message should change,” Speaker Nancy Pelosi said on ABC. “No, our message was clear: people over politics, lower costs, bigger paychecks, safer communities, and they knew the value of a woman’s right to choose. They knew how important it was to protect our democracy.”

Several Democratic officials were asked bout President Biden’s low approval ratings about polls showing that voters trusted Republicans more on the economy, crime and immigration, even if they ultimately chose Democrats based on democracy, abortion, and opposition to Trumpism.

“Do you have a concern that Democrats can’t win if they’re running against ‘normal’ Republicans?” Chuck Todd, the host of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” asked Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts.

“No, I do not have such a concern,” Ms. Warren said. “Donald Trump, with his preening and his selection of truly awful candidates, didn’t do his party any favors, but this victory belongs to Joe Biden. It belongs to Joe Biden and the Democrats who got out there and fought for working people.”

“The things we did were important and popular,” she added, pointing to components of the Inflation Reduction Act like a cap on insulin prices for some Americans and a minimum tax for large corporations.

Anita Dunn, an advisor to Mr. Biden, made a similar argument, saying on NBC, “As the president traveled the country and I had the opportunity to travel with him in that final week, you didn’t go to a congressional district or state where the Democrats weren’t running on some aspect of the president’s agenda.”

And Gov. Gretchen Whitman of Michigan — who won re-election by a double-digit margin, and will have an allied legislature after Democrats flipped both chambers — said she did not believe abortion was separate from economic concerns.

“I know a lot of folks kind of wanted to say, ‘Should we talk about the economy or abortion?” she said on CNN. “But the fact of the matter is, the ability to decide when and whether to have a child is the biggest economic decision a woman will make make over the course of her lifetime, and that’s why we kept that front and center too.”

Republicans were divided on what comes next

Beyond Mr. Trump and the 2024 presidential campaign, Republicans face the more immediate question of what to do with their narrow House majority if they secure one — or how to proceed if they fall short.

Mr. Cassidy, the Louisiana senator, said on NBC that he wanted the next Congress to focus on concrete policies, including bipartisan legislation; he praised the bipartisan infrastructure bill and an earlier measure against surprise medical bills.

“If we have results that show, these are our ides — now, of the left frustrates our efforts, well, that will be part of what we will discuss, but we just have to make that case,” he said, pointing to Gov. Mike DeWine of Ohio, who won re-election, as an example of someone who had enacted “polices that make people in Ohio’s lives better, and he had an incredible victory. We can go around the country and see that.”

Mr. Cotton said similarly on CBS, “We need to focus on serious, substantive accomplishments and issues like crime, like our wide-open border, like addressing runaway inflation.”

Mr. Banks, the Indiana congressman, when in a different direction.

At first, he emphasized passing legislation “that addresses the issues that the American people care about — bringing down inflation and gas prices, the border, the drug crisis, in America and the national security issues that keep Americans safe.” But then his tone changed.

January 6, 2021: NBC News posted: “How the Biden Team is Framing Georgia — and the road ahead.” It was written by Mike Memoli.

As President-elect Joe Biden plans to speak about the economy today, he’ll point to the Georgia results as yet another clear mandate from the American people to act on the key climate challenge facing the country — Covid-19, the economy, climate and racial justice.

A Biden advisor cast the result as further evidence that Biden’s core argument in the campaign was validated by voters, both in the primary that he was the best Democrat to expand the playing field with a broad coalition anchored in African Americans and suburban voters, and in the general election that the country wants to see both parties work together.

The advisor noted Biden’s closing pitch in Atlanta on Monday was the same as the two Democratic candidates’: a vote for Democrats was a vote for $2,000 stimulus check and other urgently needed relief for the American people.

That argument stood in clear contrast to what Republican have been doing since the general election: “chasing President Trump down a losing rabbit hole of election fraud in an effort to overturn the will of the people,” the advisor said.

Another Biden adviser summed it up this way: “Democrats were focused on Jan. 5 and Republicans were focused on Jan. 6.”

As some Democrats now want to see Biden push the envelope and use even narrow Democratic majorities to advance their agenda, the first Biden adviser stressed that the president-elect, even with the victories, “is just as committed to working across the aisle” now as he was before.

“You still need to build consensus, work across the aisle, govern for everyone. And that is what he’ll do.” the advisor said.

January 6, 2021: NBC News posted: “Trump allies hope Wednesday’s drama will be his last stand — but no one knows what’s next” It was written by Carol E. Lee, Kristen Welker, Kelly O’Donnell, and Monica Alba.

President Donald Trump’s allies are hoping Wednesday marks his last stand in a weeklong effort to challenge the November election results, with multiple people close to Trump privately acknowledging that his options will be exhausted once Congress tabulates the Electoral College votes.

“It’s hard to see anything behind tomorrow,” a senior administration official said Tuesday, adding that already everyone, including Trump, views efforts by dozens of Republicans in Congress to stop or delay the tabulation as “uphill.”

Yet people close to Trump also say he still may not relent after this final step in the election process, given that his determination to overturn the results has only intensified despite its having failed multiple times — including state certifications and the Electoral College meeting last month — and scores of legal defeats.

“It’s going to get worse before it gets better,” one of Trump’s allies said. “He’s lost re-election. So for somebody who has no sense of shame, there’s no downside to him letting all the crazy out.”

There’s not a serious discussion of somehow using the military to block the inauguration of President-elect Joe Biden on Jan. 20, officials said. But some of Trump’s allies have pushed the idea, and people close to him said that can’t rule out that he’ll entertain Hail Mary options to hold on to power as the end of his presidency approaches.

“He won’t stop,” a Republican with ties to the White House said, suggesting Trump will continue to press his grievances beyond Wednesday’s process in Congress. “He’s embarrassed.”

The Trump ally described him as “increasingly desperate.” And another person close to Trump said his behavior in recent days, particularly in pressing Georgia’s Secretary of State to find votes for him, “shows in his own words that there isn’t a path to victory in these election challenges.”

Already, people close to Trump said he has taken his election fraud claims much further than they thought he would.

After the election, they believed that over the next days and weeks he would get closer to accepting the results, even though he was never expected to concede. But instead, he got further away from accepting his loss, started to grasp at outlandish theories and iced out allies who weren’t completely on board, they said.

Trump is expected to speak at a rally in Washington on Wednesday to fan support for his efforts. But his aides and allies said there is no clear plan for how he’ll proceed during his final two weeks in office. The only thing they said they were certain is that Trump will leave the White House by Jan. 20, when Biden takes office.

What happens before then, they said, is unclear — although Trump does plan to issue a string of pardons.

The few Trump re-election campaign staffers who are left view Wednesday’s proceedings on Capitol Hill as an ending point and a form of closure to 2020 cycle, despite Trump’s continued denial. They expected him never to admit he lost the race, a fact he previewed at a Georgia rally Monday: “No, no, I don’t concede.”

Trump isn’t expected to attend Biden’s inauguration, and he has discussed holding a campaign-style rally instead, as NBC News has previously reported. Trump has also considered announcing a 2024 presidential bid on or before Jan. 20, but some of his allies are pressing him not to officially announce his candidacy until after 2022.

There is no infrastructure to formally launch a 2024 campaign in the coming weeks, as was once discussed immediately after the November election. Some allies expect Trump to spend the next two years dangling the prospect of another White House bid before making a final decision.

Either way, the senior administration official said, “the president is not going away.”

Some of Trump’s allies question whether he will actually mount a 2024 candidacy and see his discussions about it as aimed more at staying relevant. They also question whether Trump would have the “emotional discipline,” as one of them put it, to cede the spotlight entirely to Biden on Jan. 20.

White House officials said they view Wednesday’s congressional proceedings as a “fight for the process” and the “integrity” of the electoral system. And they underscore that Trump firmly believes the Nov. 3 election was unconstitutional, though he has been unable to prove that, despite two months of allegation which even some of his closest allies dispute.

After saying that, even with a small majority, “we have an opportunity over the next two years to be the last line of defense to block the Biden agenda,” Mr. Banks said he wanted Republicans to conduct investigations of the Biden administration’s withdrawal from Afghanistan, its pandemic policies and the origins of Covid. He said he disagreed with Senator Mitt Romney, Republican of Utah, that voters would punish Republicans in 2024 if they focused on investigations rather than legislating.

January 6, 2021: NBC News reported: “Trump allies hope Wednesday drama will be his last stand — but no one knows what’s next.” It was written by Carol E. Lee, Kristen Welker, Kelly O’Donnell and Monica Alba.

President Donald Trump’s allies are hoping Wednesday marks his last stand in a weeklong effort to challenge the November election results, with multiple people close to Trump privately acknowledging that his options will be exhausted once Congress tabulates the Electoral College votes.

“It’s hard to see anything beyond tomorrow,” a senior administration official said Tuesday, adding that already everyone, including Trump, views efforts by dozens of Republicans in Congress to stop or delay the tabulation as “uphill.”

Yet people close to Trump also say he still may not relent after this final step in the election process, given that his determination to overturn the results has only intensified despite his having failed multiple times — including state certifications and the Electoral College meeting last month — and scores of legal defeats.

“It’s going to get worse before it gets better,” one of Trump’s allies said. “He’s lost re-election. So for somebody who has no sense of shame, there’s no downside to him letting all the crazy out.”

There’s not a serious discussion of somehow using the military to block the inauguration of President-elect Joe Biden on Jan. 20, officials said. But some of Trump’s allies have pushed the idea, and people close to him said they can’t rule out that he’ll entertain Hail Mary options to hold on to power as the end of his presidency approaches.

“He won’t stop,” a Republican with ties to the White House said, suggesting Trump will continue to press his grievances beyond Wednesday’s process in Congress. “He’s embarrassed.”

The Trump ally described him as “increasingly desperate.” And another person close to Trump said his behavior in recent days, particularly in pressing Georgia’s Secretary of State to find votes for him, “shows in his own words that there isn’t a path to victory in these election challenges.”

Already, people close to Trump said he has taken his election fraud claims much further than they thought he would.

After the election, they believed that over the following days and weeks he would get closer to accepting the results, even though he never expected to concede. But instead, he got further away from accepting his loss, started to grasp at outlandish theories and iced out allies who weren’t completely on board, they said.

Trump is expected to speak at a rally in Washington on Wednesday to fan support for his efforts. But his aides and allies said there is no clear plan for how he’ll proceed during his final two weeks in office. The only thing they said they were certain of is that Trump will leave the White House by Jan. 20, when Biden takes office.

What happens before then, they said, is unclear — although Trump does plan to issue a string of pardons.

The few Trump re-election campaign staffers who are left view Wednesday’s proceedings on Capitol Hill as an ending point and a form of closure to the 2020 cycle, despite Trump’s continued denial. They expect him to never admit he lost the race, a fact he previewed at a Georgia rally Monday, “No, no, I don’t concede.”

Trump isn’t expected to attend Biden’s inauguration, and he has discussed holding a campaign-style rally instead, as NBC News has previously reported. Trump has also considered announcing a 2024 presidential bid on or before Jan. 20, but some of his allies are pressing him to not officially announce his candidacy until after 2022.

There is no infrastructure to formally launch a 2024 campaign in the coming weeks, as was once discussed immediately after the November election. Some allies expect Trump to spend the next two years dangling the prospect of another White House bid before making a final decision.

Either way, the senior administration official said, “the president is not going away.”

Some of Trump’s allies question whether he will actually mount a 2024 candidacy and see his discussions about it as aimed more at staying relevant. They also question whether Trump would have the “emotional discipline,” as one of them put it, to cede the spotlight entirely to Biden on Jan. 20.

White House officials said they view Wednesday’s congressional proceedings as a “fight for the process” and the “integrity” of the electoral system. And they underscore that Trump firmly believes the Nov. 3 election was unconstitutional, though he has been unable to prove that, despite two months of allegations which even some of his closest allies dispute.

“It’s going to be a big couple of days, but this is literally going to be his last gasp,” the Trump ally said of Wednesday’s proceedings, which could drag into Thursday. “There’s not anything he can latch on to after this.”

January 6, 2021: NBC News posted: “Pelosi declares victory in both Ga. Senate races, pushes for Voting Rights Act” It was written by Adam Edelman and Alex Moe.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Wednesday declared victory in the two Georgia Senate runoff races, praising “the courageous leadership of Georgians” and crediting it with providing “a Democratic Senate working hand-in-hand with our Democratic House majority and President-elect Joe Biden and Vice President-elect Kamala Harris.”

Democrat Raphael Warnock defeated Kelly Loeffler Tuesday, NBC News has projected, while Democrat Jon Ossoff is leading Republican David Perdue by a razor-thin margin in the remaining critical runoff election in Georgia that will determine control of the Senate and potentially the fate of Joe Biden’s presidency. NBC News has labeled the race too close to call.

“Reverend Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossify ran and won on the values of advancing equality and opportunity for working people across the state and the nation,” Pelosi said in a statement, adding that, “a unified Democratic Party will advance extraordinary progress For The People.”

“We will pursue a science and values-based plan to crush the virus and deliver relief to struggling families, safeguard the right to quality affordable health care and launch a plan to Build Back Better powered by fair economic growth,” she said.

On a weekly call with House Democrats Wednesday morning, Pelosi also told her colleagues that she has already spoken to Sen. Chuck Schumer, D. N.Y., who, if Ossoff wins, will become the Senate majority leader, and that Democrats must pass the Voting Rights Act, which would allow federal oversight of jurisdictions that pass laws suppressing the vote in communities of color, sources told NBC News.

That the answer is yes might seem obvious: Though Republicans like Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida are drawing increasing attention, no one in the past six years has come close to matching Mr. Trump’s prominence and influence within the party. But as Republicans sought to explain their unexpectedly weak election performance in interviews on Sunday, the morning after Democrats clinched control of the Senate, some of them denied it.

January 13, 2021: The Wall Street Journal posted: “Trump Urges Supporters Not To Break Law Or Use Violence in Washington D.C.” It was written by Gordon Lubold.

“I talked about how I intend to represent them,” he said, “And my opponent was focused on how she would represent her own interests. And I think the folks heard that loud and clear.”

The White House released a video Tweet Wednesday evening in which President Trump implored his supporters not to break the law or use violence next week in Washington, D.C. or across the country as concerns mount that protests could become bloody.

“I want to be very clear,” he said in the video. “I unequivocally condemn the violence that we saw last week. Violence and vandalism have absolutely no place in our country, and no place in our movement,” he said.

Mr. Trump has sent mixed signals since last week’s violent protests at the U.S Capitol and he has been criticized by both critics and supporters for his apparent indifference.

Republicans and Democrats alike have said he incited the deadly storming of the Capitol last week, but Mr. Trump said as recently as yesterday that his remarks before the protest turned violent Jan. 6 were “totally appropriate.”

But allies have encouraged him to speak out more forcefully.

“No true supporter of mine could ever endorse political violence, no true supporter of mine could ever disrespect law enforcement,” he said in the video. “If you do any of this things, you are not supporting our movement, you are attacking it, and you are attacking our country, and we can not tolerate it.”

His latest remarks come after Mr. Trump was impeached Wednesday, the second time, by the House of Representatives.

Law enforcement officials have said that more than a dozen groups supporting Mr. Trump have directed their followers to come to Washington and to beset state capitals in all 50 states next week.

In Washington alone, as many as 20,000 National soldiers, many of whom will be armed, are expected to support thousands of law enforcement personnel around Washington for the inauguration of President-elect Joe Biden.

Since Mr. Trump’s Twitter account was suspended last week, the White House tweeted the video on a separate government account. Mr. Trump also used the video released Wednesday to criticize social media companies.

“The effort to censure, cancel, and blacklist our fellow citizens are wrong and they are dangerous,” he said. “What is needed now is for us to listen to one another, not to silence one another.”

Mr. Trump didn’t mention his impeachment.

January 13, 2021: The Wall Street Journal posted: “Trump Urges No Violence or Lawbreaking” It was written by Rebecca Ballhaus

President Trump on Wednesday called for American to engage in “NO violence, NO lawbreaking and NO vandalism of any kind,” as law enforcement officials prepare for the possibility of more rioting around Inauguration Day.

In a statement released by the White House, Mr. Trump called for Americans to “help ease tensions and calm tempers” and said violence and vandalism was “not what I stand for, and it is not what American stands for.”

Mr. Trump also sent the statement to supporters via a text message from his campaign.

The deployment of National Guard personnel to Washington ahead of next week’s inauguration is expected to reach at least 20,000, military officials said Wednesday, more than three times the original size of the planned contingent.

Advisers have urged the president to try to calm tensions in his final week in office, as the House holds a vote to impeach him for inciting last week’s violent riot at the U.S. Capitol. On Tuesday, Mr. Trump also urged his supporters not to engage in violence but accepted no responsibility for the Capitol riot.

January 13, 2021: The Wall Street Journal posted: “Criminal Charges Proliferate Against Members of Pro-Trump Capitol Mob” It was written by Aruna Viswanatha and Sadie Gurman.

Several members of the pro-Trump mob that stormed the U.S Capitol last week have reported their own involvement to law enforcement this week, officials said Wednesday, as prosecutors race to charge dozens of the most visible participants in the attack and continue to dig into what kind of planning went into it.

Lawyers for several of the rioters have called law enforcement to disclose information about their clients’ participation in the breach in an effort to avoid more serious criminal charges and potentially negotiate plea deals, law-enforcement officials said.

In dozens of cases filed since the deadly riot, prosecutors have targeted some of the most visible participants whose efforts were broadcast widely on social media. They announced the arrest Wednesday of a Virginia man who as photographed on the scene wearing a sweatshirt bearing the words Camp Auschwitz. Among others arrested was a man from Idaho who was identified from photos showing him hanging by one hand from the Senate balcony.

January 13, 2021: The Wall Street Journal posted: “Posters on Far-Right Site Discuss National Guard as Threat to Further D.C. Protests” It was written by Ian Talley.

Some supporters of violent action against a Biden presidency appear to have been deterred by the prospect of 20,000 members of the National Guard being deployed in Washington, with some expressing fears that protest planned there for Sunday could amount to a federal law-enforcement dragnet.

“I would NOT go to these events,” a poster going by the pseudonym “Tusco” said on Tuesday on the site thedonald.win, where some participants said they planned to storm the Capitol ahead of the Jan. 6 attack. “They do NOT have verified sponsors, and will likely be non-peaceful. It’s likely a trap to bait conservatives.”

“We need 3 brigades in DC to secure our inauguration,” posted a person using the pseudonym “EyesintheHills” said on the same site Monday. “That’s more soldiers in DC than we have in Afghanistan. Let that sink in.”

Others appeared undeterred, including some who had posed plans for armed violence in D.C. ahead of last week’s assault on the Capitol. In a discussion on thedonald.win about whether Trump supporters should be prepared to use violence on Sunday. “Maga_Centurion” said: “I am. 1776 will commence. F— the government. F— the FBI. F- Commies. F—the CCP. Kill anyone who infringes on your rights.

Some posters on that site discussed targeting House Speaker Nancy Pelosi in particular. “I’d off that f—ing bitch in a heartbeat,” Metalhead_Gamer said on the same site Monday.

“We need digital warriors to research her whereabouts. Hard information,” said a post under the handle “Morrowlane” Tuesday in a thread about Ms. Pelosi that included speculation about her death.

January 13, 2021: The Hill reported: “Pelosi: Trump is a ‘clear and present danger’ It was written by Cristina Marcos.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) on Wednesday called President Trump a “clear and present danger” to America as he made an impassioned appeal to lawmakers to support impeaching him for inciting the violent mob attack on the Capitol one week ago.

Pelosi kicked off House floor debate on the article of impeachment stating that Trump incited insurrection against the U.S. government with one of the most impassioned speeches of her career.

Pelosi said that impeachment would “ensue that the republic will be safe from this man who was so resolutely determined to tear down the things that we hold dear and that hold us together.”

“Those insurrectionists were not patriots. They were not part of a political base to be catered to and managed. They were domestic terrorists. And justice must prevail,” Pelosi said.

The House will vote on impeaching Trump later on Wednesday. At least five Republicans are expected to vote to impeach the president, including Rep. Liz Cheney, (Wyo.), the third-ranking House GOP lawmaker.

Pelosi pleaded with Democrats and Republicans to “search your souls” to answer questions about Trump’s behavior.

“Is the president’s war on democracy in keeping with the Constitution? Were his words and insurrectionary mob a high crime and misdemeanor? Do we not have a duty to our oath to do all we constitutionally can to protect our nation and our democracy from the appetites and ambitions of a man who has self-evidently demonstrate that he is a vital threat to liberty, to self-government, and the rule of law?”

“Our country is divided. We all know that,” Pelosi continued. “But I know this as well. That we here in the House have a sacred obligation to stand for truth. To stand up for the Constitution, to stand as guardians of the republic.”

She quoted from a speech that the late President John F. Kennedy was set to deliver on Nov. 22, 1963 in Dallas, in which he planned to say: “We in this country, in this generation, are — by destiny rather than choice — the watchmen on the walls of the world freedom. We ask, therefore, that we may be worthy of our power and responsibility.”

Kennedy was assassinated before he could deliver those words in that planned speech.

“But they resonate more even now, in our time in this place. Let us be worthy of our power and responsibility,” Pelosi said.

“My fellow members, my fellow Americans: We cannot escape history,” Pelosi said.

Wednesday marks the second set of impeachment proceedings that Pelosi has presided over in the last 13 months.

The House passed two articles of impeachment in December 2019 accusing Trump of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress related to his efforts to pressure the Ukrainian government to open an investigation into Biden, while the Senate voted last February mostly along party lines to acquit him. Trump will be the first president in the U.S. to be impeached twice.

January 13, 2021: The Wall Street Journal posted: “New York Transportation Employee Charged in Capitol Riot” It was written by Corinne Ramey.

A New York area transportation employee was charged Wednesday for what federal prosecutors said was his role in the pro-Trump riot that swept the U.S. Capitol last week.

William Pepe was charged with one count of knowingly entering or remaining in any restricted building or grounds without lawful authority, prosecutors said. Mr. Pepe, 31 years old, was arrested on Tuesday around 1 p.m. in White Plains, N.Y. He appeared virtually Wednesday in federal court in White Plains.

A spokesperson for Mr. Pepe’s employer, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, said Mr. Pepe was suspended last week. “Participation in the riot which resulted in deadly violence at the Capitol last week was abhorrent to the values of the MTA and New Yorkers, and those who attacked that symbol of American democracy disqualified themselves from working for the People of New York,” the spokesman said.

Mr. Pepe wasn’t required to enter a plea. A lawyer temporarily representing Mr. Pepe didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Magistrate Judge Judith McCarthy set a $10,000 bond. She said Mr. Pepe is required to surrender his shotgun and knife and isn’t permitted to travel to Washington D.C. except for court proceedings.

Mr. Pepe used sick leave on the day of the riot at the Capitol, according to court documents.

January 14, 2021: The Wall Street Journal posted: “Man Charged With Beating Police Officer With American Flag During Capitol Attack.” It was written by Aruna Viswanatha.

An Arkansas man caught on video beating a police officer with an American flag at the Capitol riot was charged on Thursday with obstructing a law enforcement officer, as federal authorities escalated their efforts Thursday to target some of the more brazen violent conduct from last week’s attack.

A man identified in court documents as Peter Stager allegedly partook in the riot and assaulted an officer from the Washington, D.C., police department. The officer was guarding an entrance of the U.S. Capitol after 4 p.m., when members of the mob grabbed him, dragged him down a set of stairs, forced him into a prone position and proceeded to forcibly and repeatedly strike him, according to the affidavit of FBI special agent Jason Coe. The document identified the Washington police officer only as B.M., saying it was anonymizing victims and witnesses.

A confidential informant notified the FBI on Tuesday that they recognized Mr. Stager from videos posted online in social media, and another video in which Mr. Stager allegedly said: “Everybody in there is a treasonous traitor. Death is the only remedy for what’s in the building.”

Another associate spoke to Mr. Stager about his involvement, and relayed that information to the FBI, according to the document, which was approved by U.S. Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui.

That associate told the FBI that Mr. Stager had relayed that he believed the person he was striking was associated with the left-wing antifa movement, but the photos show the officer laying on the ground with the words METROPOLITAN POLICE across his back, the document said.

Mr. Stager had told his associate he planned to turn himself in to law enforcement for his actions, the document said. Mr. Stager couldn’t be reached immediately for comment.

January 14, 2021: The Wall Street Journal posted: “New York Man Known For Covid-19 Protests Is Charged in Capitol Riot”

A Western New York man with a history of local protests over Covid-19 business closures was charged in connection with his role in the riot last week in Washington, D.C.

Peter Harding, 47 years old, of Cheektowaga, N.Y.m was arrested by federal agents and has been held in at the Niagara County Jail. according to county jail records. He appeared by video Thursday afternoon before a federal magistrate judge on Buffalo, N.Y., but didn’t enter a plea.

Like the dozens of others arrested on charges related to last week’s riot, which led to the deaths of five people, Mr. Harding was charged by federal prosecutors in Washington. According to the complaint unsealed Thursday, Mr. Harding faces one count of knowingly entering and remaining on restricted grounds and one count of disorderly conduct.

Mr. Harding’s lawyers told the magistrate judge Thursday that Mr. Harding had called the FBI himself and argued he didn’t pose a threat to the community. “There is no evidence that he did anything violent,” one of the lawyers, Jeremy D. Schwartz said before his client’s hearing.

During Thursday’s hearing, Assistant U.S. Attorney Charles Kruly pointed to a video posted online on Jan. 7 in which Mr. Harding says he recorded the events at the Capitol and said: “We learned how strong we are.. If we can take the Capitol building, there is nothing we can’t accomplish — county government, city government, town government, state government.” The video was also cited in a sworn statement filed by an FBI agent on Jan. 11 as part of the criminal complaint.

Mr. Harding’s arrest came a day after the FBI posted a picture of him on its Twitter page on Tuesday, seeking information about his identity. Local media and others on social media quickly identified him. On Wednesday, FBI agents showed up at Mr. Harding’s home. He was arrested later in the day at a friend’s house, a federal prosecutor said Thursday.

The FBI statement for Mr. Harding includes images from videos showing Mr. Harding holding a lighter under a pile of trashed news equipment outside the Capitol. Mr, Harding told a local news network last week: “Nothing burned. It was metal. It was far from any structure.

Mr. Harding at first told Buffalo-area reporters last week that he hadn’t entered the building. He later apologized and clarified that he had been there as a “peacekeeper.”

Mr. Harding has been a fixture on local news programs over the past year, as he has participated in several protest against Covid-19 business shutdowns and mask mandates. In June, he was arrested for third-degree criminal trespass after he allegedly refused to wear a mask inside a Cheektowaga liquor store and became confrontational. His lawyer, Mr. Schwartz, said that case was still pending and that his client maintains he hadn’t done anything wrong.

January 14, 2021: The Wall Street Journal posted: “Extremists in Capitol Riot Had Histories of Violent Rhetoric and Threats.” It was written by Dan Frosch, Rachael Levy, and Zusha Elinson.

Numerous extremists and private militia groups discussed online and in their emails their plans to attend or support the Jan. 6 pro-Trump rally in Washington that ended in the riot at the Capitol.

Their public plans and calls for followers to attend the rally should have been enough to put federal law enforcement on high alert, current and former government officials said.

Instead, federal law-enforcement officials have said they failed to fully appreciate the potential for violence last Wednesday. Senior FBI officials have said agents were concerned that some people planning to attend the protest posed potential threats, and the agents attempted to dissuade them from traveling to Washington. But the officials said they had no intelligence or a wider, coordinated plot.

“It was no different than Charlottesville,” a Department of Homeland Security official said, referring to the 2017 white supremacist rally in Virginia that left one woman dead and dozens injured. “Why couldn’t leadership see this coming? … We were caught with our pants down.”…

January 14, 2021: The Wall Street Journal posted “Man Who Allegedly Threw Fire Extinguisher At Police Arrested On Federal Charges” It was written by Aruna Viswanatha and Erin Ailworth.

A retired firefighter from Pennsylvania was arrested Thursday morning for allegedly throwing a fire extinguisher that hit three police officers at the pro-Trump riot at the U.S. Capitol as captured on video, U.S. officials said.

Robert Sanford of Chester, Pa., faces three federal felony charges including assaulting a police officer after he was allegedly identified as the person who lobbed a fire extinguisher on the west side of the Capitol, at around 2:30 pm, as the mob crashed past a thin line of Capitol police officers and stormed towards the building on Jan. 6.

In an affidavit filed in connection with Mr. Sanford’s arrest, an FBI special agent described the mob as “insurrectionists”. “The video was shot from an elevated position and showed an area of the Capitol with a large group of police officers surrounded on at least three sides by a group of insurrectionists,” the statement of facts said. It also described the object hitting all three officers in the head, including one who was not wearing a helmet.

Around the same time, a radio dispatch captured by OpenMHZ, a platform that records radio chatter from law enforcement and life–safety services agencies, relayed an emergency code: “There is a 10-33 at the Capitol building. It has been breached.” The 10-33 code signifies an emergency in which an officer needs assistance.

The extinguisher that Mr. Sanford allegedly threw is separate from the one that killed Officer Brian Sicknick, who was also stuck in the head with a fire extinguisher during the unrest and died from his wounds, official said.

One of the offices who was hit, William Young, was evaluated at a hospital and cleared to return to duty, the charging document said. A friend of Mr. Sanford’s tipped off the FBI to his involvement, the document said, adding that he was around 55-years old and recently retired from the Chester Fire Department.

The tipster relayed to the FBI in an interview that Mr. Sanford had told his friend that he had traveled to Washington, D.C., with a group of people on a bus, that the group had gone to the White House and listened to President Trump’s speech, “and then had followed the President’s instructions and gone to the Capitol,” the statement said.

Law-enforcement officers on Capitol grounds were targeted by the crowd with a variety of makeshift weapons, including extinguishers and flags.

Dispatches captured by OpenMHZ caught several instances of officers injured in the melee.

“Multiple officers injured at the Capitol, west side,” one dispatch says around 1:20 p.m. Another at about 2:05 p.m. relays “Saying that they have an officer down, hit in the head.”

The charges against Mr. Sanford, who couldn’t immediately be reached for comment, come as prosecutors have filed dozens of cases against the most visible participants in the riot, many of whose efforts were widely broadcast on social media. Neighbors and others who recognized the participants have also provided the Federal Bureau of Investigation with tips about their identities, according to court documents.

Mr. Sanford faces charges of using a deadly weapon in a restricted area, which carries a potential 10 year prison term, disorderly conduct on Capitol grounds, and obstructing law enforcement.

January 14, 2021: The Wall Street Journal posted “Sedition Laws Give Prosecutors Powerful Tool for Pro-Trump Capitol Riot” It was written by Jacob Gershman.

Over almost 160 years, U.S. sedition laws have been used sparingly, including against a Christian militia group, Puerto Rican militants and Islamic jihadists who conspired to blow up New York landmarks.

Now, federal prosecutors say they plan to bring seditious conspiracy charges in their rapidly developing probe into the pro-Trump mob that stormed the Capitol last week. The charge is a powerful tool for prosecutors, signaling their intent to treat last week’s siege as a grave assault on national security.

Federal prosecutors have filed charges against at least two dozen members of the mob — including the sone of a Brooklyn judge and a military veteran who brought plastic zip-tie restraints with him to the Capitol — on charges ranging from gun crimes to assault and theft. A team of senior national-security and public corruption prosecutors is handling the most serious offenders, federal officials said.

“Their only marching orders from me are to build sedition and conspiracy charges related to the most heinous acts that occurred in the Capitol.” Michael Sherwin, the acting U.S. attorney in Washington, said Tuesday.

January 14, 2021: The Wall Street Journal posted: “Republican Voters Stick by Trump as Some Lawmakers Seek Distance” It was written by Joshua Jamerson.

Republican elected officials who have criticized President Trump following a mob attack on the Capitol are trying to navigate distancing themselves from the commander in chief as some GOP voters say they don’t want a clean break.

In this GOP-leaning suburb of Charleston, represented by freshman Republican Rep. Nancy Mace, some of the party’s voters said they will still back Mr. Trump. They condemned the mob in Washington last week but — unlike Ms. Mace — said the president wasn’t responsible for the actions of those supporters.

“Right now, Republican across the board are weak,” said Gary Simmons, a Republican. He said he opposed the violence on Jan. 6, but he thought Mr. Trump was right to challenge the November election results. He said he had expected more Republicans would object to certifying Mr. Biden’s win.

“I’d ditch ’em in a heartbeat,” he said of Republicans who try to distance themselves from the outgoing president.

Ms. Mace, who unseated Democrat Joe Cunningham in November, didn’t object to certifying Mr. Biden’s victory and has said she holds the president accountable for the riot. The freshman lawmaker voted against impeaching Mr. Trump Wednesday.

She also made a point of calling the mob that rampaged the Capitol in an effort to prevent Congress from ratifying President-elect Joe Biden’s Electoral College victory “domestic terrorists.”

“Every accomplishment that Republicans and President Trump have had over the past four years was entire wiped out on Wednesday,” Ms. Mace said in an interview, referring to the day of the riot. “We have to rebuild.” But she acknowledged that his supporters have been a powerful political force.

“In seeing the events that transpired… it’s clear that people, some people, have been brainwashed,” she said, pointing to Mr. Trump’s supporters believing his claims the election was stolen. “And I’m grappling with: How do we carefully and honestly pull these people out of it and bring them back to reality? And it’s something that I am very thoughtful of.”

January 6, 2021: NBC News reported: “Sens. Tillis, Young, to oppose GOP colleagues’ electoral count objections.” It was written by Rebecca Shabad.

GOP Sens. Thom Tillis, and Todd Young, said Wednesday that they oppose the planned effort by members of their party to object to the counting of states’ electoral votes by Congress on Wednesday.

“The framers of our Constitution made it clear that the power to verify elections is reserved to the states, not Congress. Refusing to certify state election results has no viable path to success, and most importantly, it lends legitimacy to the left’s state policy objectives of completely federalizing elections and eliminating the Electoral College,” said Tillis, who won re-election in November after a close race in North Carolina, said in a statement. “Congress should not overstep its Constitutional authority by overturning the results of states and the will of American voters, especially absent legitimate requests from states for Congress to intervene.”

“Oversight is a primary function of the Congress, and for the last two years there has been no oversight of the Biden agenda and the Biden administration,” he said. “That has to be a focal point of every single committee in the Congress.”

Both he and Young of Indiana warned that the GOP objections would set a dangerous precedent.

“For Congress to supplant the will of a state’s certified electors for its own would be unconstitutional and set a dangerous precedent, damaging the integrity of and future respect for the Electorate College. This is not an empty warning,” Young said in a statement.

January 6, 2021: NBC News posted: “Defying Trump, Pence says he won’t overturn the 2020 election” It was written by Rebecca Shabad.

Vice President Mike Pence said in a letter released to Congress just before it started counting the electoral votes handing Joe Biden the presidency that he won’t try to overturn the 2020 presidential election, which President Trump had been demanding he do.

“I do not believe that the founders of our country intended to invest the vice president with unilateral authority to decide which electoral voters should be counted during the Joint session of Congress, and no vice president in American history has ever asserted such authority,” he wrote in a three-page letter released by his office.

“Instead, vice presidents presiding over joint sessions has uniformly follow the Electoral Count Act, conducing the proceedings in an orderly manner even where the count resulted in the defeat of their party or their own candidacy,” he added.

January 6, 2021: NBC News posted: “GOP registered first objection after joint session of Congress gets underway” It was written by Rebecca Shabad and Alex Moe.

The joint session of Congress got underway at 1 p.m. ET as Pence and lawmakers read the number of electoral votes that were awarded to Biden and Trump from each state.

Both members of the House and Senate began in the House chamber with Pence and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., at the top of the dais.

Rep. Paul Gosar, R-Ariz., along with 60 of his Republican colleagues quickly objected to the elector votes that were awarded to Biden by the state of Arizona. He was joined by at least Sen. Ted Cruz, who stood and applauded, in signing the first objection to the Arizona electors.

The joint session then retired. There will now be up to two hours of debate in both the House and the Senate, because a House member and a Senator submitted a written opinion.

January 6, 2021: NBC News posted: “Police evacuate area near Capitol as pro-trump protesters storm barricades” It was written by Rebecca Shabad.

The U.S. Capitol Police said they were evacuating areas near the Capitol as pro-Trump protesters attempted to storm barricades set up outside the perimeter of the complex and law enforcement were seen trying to push them back.

The Library of Congress, located directly across the street from the main Capitol building, was evacuated and people were told to remain calm and move in a safe manner to the exits.

Hundreds of protesters, some carrying large Trump flags, were seen on the East Front of the Capitol trying to move past security.

January 6, 2021: NBC News posted: “Fact Check: No evidence for claims Arizona’s results were marred by fraud”. It was written by Jane C. Timm.

Rep. Paul Gosar, R-Ariz., joined by Sen Ted Cruz, R-Texas, objected to Arizona’s election results on Wednesday, kicking off up to two hours of debate in both chambers over a claim that those results were “not regularly given.”

Gosar has alleged on Twitter that 200,000 voters were changed in he state, contributing to Biden’s win. There is no evidence of this.

Arizona counties completed hand count audits of the vast majority of the ballots in the state. The audits found either a handful of discrepancies or no discrepancies. Several lawsuits in the state alleged fraud and were dismissed or withdrawn.

January 6, 2021: NBC News posted: “Obama congratulates Warnock: Democrats ‘should feel good today” It was written by Randi Richardson.

Former President Barack Obama congratulated Democrat Raphael Warnock Wednesday for his election victory in a statement posted to his Twitter.

“Georgia’s first Black senator will make the chamber more reflective of our country as a whole and open the door for a Congress that can forgo gridlock for gridlock’s sake to focus instead on the many crises facing our nation — pandemic relief for struggling families, voting rights, protecting our planet, and more,” Obama said.

“Democrats in Georgia and across the country should feel good today,” he added.

January 6, 2021: President Obama posted: “My friend John Lewis is surely smiling down on his beloved Georgia this morning, as people across the state carried forward the baton that he and so many others passed down to them.”

STATEMENT ON GEORGIA SENATE RUNOFF ELECTIONS

My friend John Lewis is surely smiling down on his beloved Georgia this morning, as people across the state carried forward the baton that he and so many others passed down to them.

“I took an oath under God, under God!” Young said. “Do we still take that seriously in this country?”

I want to congratulate Reverend Raphael Warnock on his election as Georgia’s next U.S. Senator — and while we’re still waiting on final results in the other runoff, it’s clear that last night’s showing, alongside President-Elect Biden’s November victory in Georgia, is a testament to the power of the tireless and often unheralded work of grassroots organizing and the resilient, visionary leadership of Stacey Abrams. Georgia’s first Black senator will make the chamber more reflective of our country as a whole and open the door for a Congress that can forego gridlock for gridlock’s sake to focus instead on the many crises facing our nation — pandemic relief for struggling families, voting rights, protecting our planet, and more.

Democrats in Georgia and across the country should feel good today. But the past four years show us that even outside of election season — and outside of races that garner national attention — we’ve got to remain engaged in civic life. From police reforms to gerrymandering decisions, many levels of real and lasting process are found at the state and local levels, and further advancements depend on us vigilantly honoring the precious, sometimes fragile gift of the American experiment. In recent years, our institutions, our democracy, and truth itself have been greatly tested by those who’ve chosen to prioritize personal gain or political ambition over our democratic principles. And even a good election will not eliminate these threats.

Yet we should also remember that in two weeks, we will inaugurate a new president. He will have a chance to work with a new Senate and House on the business of the American people. If we want to protect the gains we’ve made, achieve more progress in the years to come, and reinforce the foundations of self-governance on which our country rests, there’s no better path to follow than the one forged by the determined, organized, and confidently hopeful people of Georgia.

January 6, 2021: NBC News reported: “4 dead, Congress evacuated, National Guard activated after pro-Trump rioters storm Capitol” It was written by Allan Smith, Ginger Gibson, Daniel Arkin, and Dartunooro Clark.

The U.S. Capitol descended into chaos and violence Wednesday as hundreds of pro-Trump rioters swarmed the building, leaving four people dead and forcing the Senate to evacuate and Vice President Mike Pence to be ushered to safety.

The frenzied scene after rioters broke through barricades forced Congress to evacuate parts of the building and abruptly pause a ceremonial event affirming that President-elect Joe Biden won the November election. In one dramatic moment, police officers drew guns as rioters tried to break into the House Chamber.

Pence, who was presiding over the joint session of Congress, could be seen rushing out of the Senate chamber amid the sounds of throngs of President Trump’s supporters who surrounded the Capitol. Pence and Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, the Senate pro team, were taken to a secure location, a senator told NBC News.

A woman was fatally shot by U.S. Capitol Police and three other people died in “medical emergencies.” Washington Police Chief Robert Contee said.

The doors of the Senate were closed and locked, and senators were told to stay away from the area. The doors to the House were barricaded, and some lawmakers were seen praying. Washington Mayor Muriel Bowser ordered a 12-hour curfew in the city that began Wednesday evening.

Twitter and other social media channels were flooded with images of protestors skirmishing with police officers, and there were multiple reports of rioting inside the Capitol as some rioters broke windows, battered down doors and postured in the Senate chamber.

Improvised explosive devices were found on the Capitol grounds, several law enforcement officials said. Officers were in the process of destroying the devices, and it was not clear whether they were functional. At least one was made of a small section of galvanized pipe.

The woman who was fatally shot by Capitol Police was Ashli Babbitt, 35, of San Diego, family members old NBC San Diego.

Her brother-in-law, Justin Jackson, said in a statement to the station: “Ashli was both loyal and as well as extremely passionate about what she believed in. She loved this country and felt honored to have served in our Armed Forces. Please keep her family in your thoughts and respect their privacy during this time.”

Five weapons were recovered from the complex, and three arrests were made, D.C. police said. None of the people were residents of the District of Columbia. There were 12 arrests in the two days leading up to Wednesday.

Images from the clashed were rife with disturbing hate symbols: a photo of a noose that had been hung on the west side of the Capitol, protestors waving Confederate flags or using white power gestures.

Trump directed to the National Guard to head to the Capitol, he said in a tweet, and U.S. Capitol Police requested additional support. The FBI was deployed, and the U.S. Marshals Services assisted, too.

As Bowser’s 12-hour curfew went into effect, most of the protesters dispersed, but pro-Trump demonstrators were seen in videos on social media roaming the city’s streets amid a heavy police presence.

Washington police announced several arrests to the protests and about 50 curfew-violation arrests as of 10:30 p.m. The police department said that most of the arrestees were from out of state and that it was processing additional arrests.

Bowser said the city is working with federal law enforcement agencies to identify and prosecute people who stormed the chambers of Congress.

All four living former presidents decried the rioting.

Former President George W. Bush condemned the violence in a statement and also indirectly criticized Trump and his supporters.

“It is a sickening and heartbreaking sight. This is how election results are disputed in a banana republic — not our democratic republic,” he said. “I am appalled by the reckless behavior of some political leaders since the election and by lack of respect shown today for our institutions, our traditions, and our law enforcement.”

Bush said the passions of protestors were “inflamed by falsehoods and false hopes.”

Former President Barack Obama excoriated Trump in a statement and denounced the violence, calling it a “moment of great dishonor and shame for our nation.”

“Right now, Republican leaders have a choice made clear in the desecrated chambers of democracy. They can continue down this road and keep stoking the raging fires,” Obama said. “Or they can choose reality and take the first steps toward extinguishing the flames. They can choose America.”

Former President Jimmy Cater said in a statement, “This is a national tragedy and is not who were are as a nation,” while Bill Clinton tweeted, “The match was lit by Donald Trump and his most ardent enablers, including many in Congress, to overturn the results of an election lost.”

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif, confirming on Fox News that shots had been fired inside the Capitol, called the mayhem “un-American” and said: “We can disagree, but we should not take it to this level, … You do not do what is happening right now. People are being hurt. This is unacceptable.”

Biden called on Trump to go on national television to “fulfill his oath and defend the Constitution and demand an end to this siege.”

“It’s not protest. It’s insurrection,” he said. “The words of a president matter, no matter how good or bad it is.”

The top Democrats in Congress echoed Biden’s message: “We are calling on President Trump to demand that all protestors leave the U.S. Capitol and Capitol Grounds immediately,” Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said in a joint statement.

Pelosi, in another statement Wednesday, called the violence “a shameful assault” on democracy and vowed that both chambers would finish certifying Biden’s win under heightened protection.

Congress reconvened late Wednesday evening, with member of both parties sharply rebuking the violence and vandalism of the chamber. Pence called it “a dark day in the history of the United States Capitol.”

“To those who wreaked havoc in our Capitol today: You did not win. Violence never wins. Freedom wins. And this is still the people’s house,” he said.

Former Attorney General William Barr, who was with Trump last summer as National Guard members sprayed tear gas to disperse peaceful protestors so the president could hold a Bible for a photo opportunity, admonished the rioters.

“The violence at the Capitol Building is outrageous and despicable. Federal agencies should move immediately to disburse it,” he said.

Dan Eberhart, a prominent donor to Trump and the Republican Party, also sharply criticized the protests and the president.

“If President Trump wants to have any kind of political future within the Republican Party, he needs to condemn the violence at the Capitol and stop claiming the election was stolen,” Eberhart told NBC News. “President Trump had his day in court. It’ time to concede defeat and think about his political future.”

He added, “The description of the Capitol is not going to be forgotten. He cost Sen. [Mitch] McConnell his leadership position, and now he’s s—–g all over the Capitol.”

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo condemned the violence in a series of tweets and called for arrests and prosecution.

“Let us swiftly bring justice to the criminals who engaged in this rioting,” he said in the tweet.

McConnell, R-Ky., the Senate majority leader, rebuked the rioters — without noting the source of the violence — and called them “thugs.”

“Criminal behavior will never dominate the United States,” he said. He did not identify its source, nor did he call on his members to drop their objections to the count. “This institution is resilient. Our democratic republic is strong. The American people deserve nothing less.”

Schumer, who is poised to succeed McConnell as majority leader, sharply criticized the protests but squarely placed the blame on Trump in a fiery speech before Biden’s win was certified.

“Make no mistake. Make no mistakes, my friends. Today’s events did not happen spontaneously,” he said. “This mob was, in good part, President Trump’s doing — incited by his words, his lies. This violence, in good part, his responsibility, his everlasting shame.”

Schumer also called for rioters to be “prosecuted to the full extent of the law — hopefully by this administration. If not, certainly by the next.”

Trump, who earlier Wednesday called on his supporter to march to the Capitol and even suggested that he might join them before he ultimately returned to the White House, addressed the chaos and the unrest in a series of tweets that Twitter eventually flagged for spreading false election claims and posing “a risk of violence.”

He asked people to go home but did not condemn the violence.

The chaos erupted after Trump spoke to a large crowd in front of the White House. He angrily vowed never to concede to Biden and baselessly asserted that the election results were fraudulent.

“We will never give up. We will never concede when there is theft involved,” Trump told supporters, some of whom chanted “USA!” or waved anti-Biden banners. He later falsely claimed that Biden would be an “illegitimate” president.

In the White House after violent clashes in and around the Capitol, chief of staff Mark Meadows, press secretary Kayleigh McEnany and senior advisers Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner were among those meeting with the president, a person familiar with the matter said.

Some aides appear shaken by the events, which aired on televisions in the West Wing.

“There’s been some hard days and some challenging days,” a person familiar with meetings said. “I would say that this one’s the toughest.”

Stephanie Grisham, Melania Trump’s chief of staff and a former White House press secretary, submitted her resignation Wednesday.

Twitter also, for the first time, locked Trump’s account after it flagged and removed several of his tweets for “repeated and severe violations” of the company’s civic integrity policy. The company threatened permanent suspension if the tweets were not deleted. Facebook also blocked Trump’s access to his account for 24 hours.

Trump had tweeted several messages, some of which were removed for “contributing to the risk of ongoing violence.”

Trump’s groundless claims of voter fraud have been widely debunked, and his legal team’s efforts to challenge the election results in court have been rejected by a succession of judges. Trump had claimed that Wednesday’s joint session of Congress was a chance to overturn the election, even though state electors had already certified the results and the event inside the Capitol was ceremonial.

Trump had put pressure on Pence to intervene in the count. In his lengthy and digressive remarks, Trump called on Pence to “do the right thing,” even though Pence’s ceremonial role did not give him with power to intervene. Pence sent a letter to Congress before the ceremony saying he would not be doing what Trump had hoped.

Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., tweeted that she was drawing up articles of impeachment against Trump.

“We can’t allow him to remain in office, it’s a matter of preserving our Republic and we need to fulfill our oath,” she tweeted.

Trump was impeached by the House in late 2019 and acquitted by the Senate in early 2020.

Jason Bjorklund, who flew to the capital from Sioux Falls, South Dakota, said he did not know what to expect when Congress convened.

“I just felt compelled to be here, because it seems like our republic is slipping away from us,” Bjorklund said. He added, baselessly that there were “mountains of evidence of fraud” and detailed conspiracy theories about voting machines using software made by Dominion Voting Systems.

When asked to account for the judges who have rejected the Trump legal’s team attempts to challenge the results, Bjorklund said: “I think we’ve got corruption from the top to the bottom.”

Before Trump’s speech, it appeared that some senators were being approached by Trump supporters near the Capitol, including an apparently exaggerated Sen. Todd Young, R-Ind., who said he would not vote against affirming Biden’s victory because he was bound to follow the law.

Theresa Riley and her husband, Bill, came to the nation’s capital from Michigan — a key Midwest state that fell into the Democratic column in November — to participate in the protests because they believe Biden’s triumph was fraudulent.

“We don’t believe they’re honest, true voters,” Theresa Riley said as Celine Dion’s theme song from the movie “Titanic” played on a speaker system in the background. “There’s a lot of cheating going on, and I think everybody knows that, including Democrats.”

Bill Riley said that even without “doing too much research,” it was clear that “something’s up” with the November election results.

“The only thing I can say is, however many people are here, this isn’t going to go away.” he said. “If you thought 2020 was weird, 2021 is going to be ‘hold my beer,” if you ask me.

January 6, 2021: NBC News posted: “In strongest words yet, McConnell rejects effort by Trump, GOP to overturn the election” It was written by Rebecca Shabad.

In his strongest words yet, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., dismissed Trump’s baseless claims that the 2020 presidential election was stolen from him and made clear that he will not approve the objections raised by his GOP colleagues over the counting of electoral votes from key battleground states.

“Our Democracy would enter a death spiral” if election were overturned, McConnell said on the Senate floor.

“Mr. Trump claims the election was stolen,” he said. “The assertions ranged from specific local allegations to constitutional arguments to sweeping conspiracy theories. I supported the president’s right to use the legal system. Dozens of lawsuits received hearings in courtrooms all across our country. But over and over, the court rejected these claims, including all-start judges” nominated by Trump himself.

McConnell spoke on the floor as the chamber began two hours of debate on a motion to object to the certification of Arizona’s electoral votes, which were awarded to Biden in November. The majority leader used his remarks to reprimand members of his own party who are challenging the official results of the election.

“We cannot simply declare ourselves a national board of elections on steroids. Voters, courts, and the states have all spoken. If we overrule them, It would damage our republic forever. This election actually was not unusually close,” McConnell said.

“It would be unfair and wrong to disenfranchise American votes and overrule the courts and the states on this extraordinary thin basis,” he said. “And I will not pretend such a vote would be a harmless protest gesture while relying on others to do the right thing. I will vote to reject the people’s decision and defend our system of government as we know it.”

January 6, 2021: NBC News posted: “McConnell’s calls for ‘shared commitment to the truth’ after not acknowledging Biden’s win for weeks” It was written by Jane C. Timm.

Senate Majority Leader Sen. Mitch McConnell gave a powerful speech on the floor demanding that members return to “a shared commitment to the truth” that keeps American democracy in working order.

“Self-government, my colleagues, requires a shared commitment to the truth and a shared respect to the ground-rules of our system. We cannot keep drifting apart into two separate tribes, with two different sets of facts and separate realities,” he said.

It’s a remarkable statement, but it doesn’t come in a vacuum and ignores how McConnell has operated as a legislative leader while working with the nation’s most mendacious president in U.S. history.

In fact, McConnell has often kept mum while the president made repeated and sweeping false claims. Just this fall, Trump spent six weeks claiming victory in the 2020 election before McConnell congratulated Joe Biden on his presidential victory on Dec. 15.

January 6, 2021: Elaine Luria posted on Twitter (now X): “I just had to evacuate my office because of a pipe bomb reported outside. Supporters of the President are trying to force their way into the Capitol and I can hear what sounds like multiple gunshots . (1/2)

I don’t recognize our country today and the members of Congress who have supported this anarchy and do not deserve to represent their fellow Americans (2/2).

January 6, 2021: NBC News posted: “Trump continues his attacks as protesters storm the Capitol” It was written by Jane C. Timm.

President Donald Trump continued to escalate his attacks and allegations of voter fraud, even as protesters have breached the locked-down Capitol amid security concerns.

“Mike Pence didn’t have the courage to do what should have been done to protect our Country and Constitution, giving States a chance to certify a corrected set of facts, not the fraudulent or inaccurate ones which they were asked to previously certify. USA demands the truth!” Trump says.

Trump’s claims are false. Vice President Mike Pence legally has no power in this process.

Pence was rushed from the Senate chamber earlier today amid growing security concerns.

January 6, 2021: NBC News reported: “Pro-Trump protesters breach Capitol, Pence whisked away” It was written by Rebecca Shabad.

The House and Senate suddenly recessed Wednesday afternoon around 2:15 p.m. ET as pro-Trump protests escalated.

Vice President Mike Pence was ushered quickly out of the Senate chamber as it recessed and the debate between senators had to stop mid-speech. A member of the Senate told NBC News that Pence and Sen. Charles Grassley, the president pro-tempore, have been taken to a secure location.

This came as pro-Trump demonstrators breached the barricades and crowded on the Capitol steps, which is normally only accessible to lawmakers. People jumped the barricades surrounding the Capitol and police began running down hallways inside, telling people to get away from the windows.

A police officer on the third floor began shouting that protesters had gotten inside the building and that people should take shelter.

All visitors and staff must go through metal detectors every time they enter any part of the Capitol complex, including nearby House and Senate office buildings. While the entrances that the protestors were crowding near have metal detectors inside, it’s easier to circumvent them as it’s normally only entrances for lawmakers.

Senators were locked inside their chamber on the second floor of the Capitol building and protesters wearing Trump “Make America Great Again” hats and carrying flags were seen gathering outside the chamber doors. Senate chaplain Barry Black ran down the hallway, away from the Senate chambers, to his office.

“Immediately seek shelter in the closest office,” an announcement over a loudspeaker said across the Capitol, which told people to lock doors as well, amid the security threat. “Remain quiet and await further directions.”

Rep. Brendan Boyle, D-Pa., told MSNBC that he’s “never experienced anything like this.”

January 6, 2021: NBC News posted: “Pelosi, Washington Mayor call for National Guard help” A post on Twitter by Garrett Haake said:

Two sources familiar tell me that @SpeakerPelosi & @MayorBowser have asked for the national guard to come to Capitol Hill to clear rioters. One of those sources says DOD has not yet approved change-of-mission for the DC. Guard.

January 6: 2021: Mayor Muriel Bowser posted on Twitter:

“Today, Mayor Muriel Bowser ordered a citywide curfew for the District of Columbia from 6:00 p.m. Wednesday, January 6, until 6:00 a.m. on Thursday, January 7.

During the hours of the curfew, no person, other than persons designated by the Mayor, shall walk, bike, run, loiter, stand or motor by car or other mode of transport upon any street, ally, park, or other public space within the District.

The curfew imposed by the Mayor’s Order shall not apply to essential workers, including working media with their outlet-issued credentials, when engaged in essential functions, including travel to and from their essential work.”

January 6, 2021: NBC News posted: “Georgia election official: ‘This is an insurrection.’ It was written by Jane C. Timm.

Gabriel Sterling, an election official in Georgia who has spent weeks condemning the false attacks on the validity of the U.S. election as dangerous and inflammatory, called the chaotic mob of pro-Trump supporters who breached the U.S. Capitol an “insurrection.”

Gabriel Sterling posted on Twitter: Anyone elected to the House of Senate who is challenging the results of the Presidential election in Congress are part of this attempted coup inspired by the President and they should resign. This is an insurrection…

He laid the blame squarely on the president’s shoulders: “I said several weeks ago that the words and actions of the President were going to get someone shot, hurt, or killed. Shots were just fired in the U.S. Capitol. Let that link in for a moment.”

One person was shot this afternoon inside the U.S. Capitol building by a member of law enforcement, several law enforcement official said. No other details are know, including what law enforcement officer fired the shot, or the circumstances of the shooting or the nature of the persons injuries.

January 6, 2021: NBC News posted: “Pelosi, VP-elect Harris both safe, official say” It was written by Rebecca Shabad and Mike Memoli.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., is “safe,” a spokesperson for her told NBC News. The aide would not comment on her whereabouts.

She had previously been inside the House chamber.

Vice President-elect Kamala Harris, who was on the Capitol grounds today, is also “safe,”a transition officials told NBC News. But they will not comment further.

January 6, 2021: NBC News reported: “1 person shot inside Capitol, law enforcement officials confirm” It was written by Pete Williams, Tom Winter, and Doha Madani

One person was shot and several others were injured amid the frenzy at the Capitol, law enforcement officials confirmed to NBC News Wednesday.

Police did not know details regarding the circumstances of the shooting, who fired the shot, or the nature of the person’s injuries. That person is in critical condition, according to D.C. Fore and EMS.

A woman was seen on video being treated for an unknown injury as paramedics moved her on a stretcher out of the Capitol Wednesday. The building remains on lockdown.

Five people have been transported to the hospital, including one officer, according o the city’s emergency medical services.

January 6, 2021: NBC News posted: “Aide says White House staffers ‘disgusted and disappointed’ by Trump’s behavior” It was written by Shannon Pettypiece.

Most White House aides didn’t go into work on Wednesday because of road closures and protests. One staffer, who has been at the White House of all four years and worked on the re-election, said they are completely “disgusted and disappointed” by President Trump’s behavior in these final days.

“Never did anyone think it would turn out like this,” said the White House aide. “The blame for this lies squarely with the President. And whatever support he has among members has vanished. As wild as it sounds, he could be impeached in the final days.”

The aide believes Trump has lost support for the objection of vote certification in the House because of Wednesday’s unrest.

“I don’t know for a fact, no one does, because many are sheltering in place, but I would certainly anticipate that,” the staffer said.

January 7, 2021: NBC News posted: “After escalating attacks, Trump urges ‘peaceful’ protest” It was written by Jane C. Timm.

There is a screenshot where @realDonaldTrump posted: “Please support our Capitol Police and Law Enforcement. They are truly on the side of our Country. Stay peaceful!”

The tweet does not acknowledge that Trump has incited the protest by advancing baseless conspiracy theories about the results of the election.

January 7, 2021: NBC News posted: “Trump’s online base sours on Pence”. It was written by Ben Collins

As some supporters of Trump stormed the Capitol, members of the president’s largest internet communities immediately turned on Vice President Mike Pence, as it became clear that he would not overturn the results of the 2020 election.

Supporters in “watch party” threads on some extremist websites pushed elaborate, QAnon-style conspiracy theories about Pence, claiming that he was part of an elaborate plot by Satanists to take over the world. Others simply expressed feelings of betrayal, and encouraged others to storm the Capitol.

Pro-Trump online forums had planned online for days to storm the Capitol if the election was not overturned in favor of Donald Trump.

January 7, 2021: NBC News reported: ‘It was predictable’: Extremism experts point to signs well ahead of riots” It was written by Brandy Zadrozny.

As pro-Trump protestors stormed the U.S. Capitol, online extremism researchers expressed frustration and disappointment with the inevitability of the movements they’ve tracked online coming to fruition in real life.

“It would be shocking if they hadn’t been saying for years they were going to do this,” said Megan Squire, a computer science professor at Elon University who tracks nationalists and other extremist groups online. “And the role of the online platforms in fomenting this entire debacle can not be overstated. They consistently ignored advice from experts to remove the loudest voices pushing the most deranged conspiracy theories and violent rhetoric. They chose time and time again to look the other way.”

Similar breaches by Trump supports occurred in several different states recently including Oregon and Michigan, noted Joan Donovan, research director of the Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy at the Harvard Kennedy School.

“Tactics are contagious and spread quickly,” Donovan said. “It was predictable.”

Donavan said the strong QAnon presence in the riots were also to be expected.

“For years, they believed they were the digital soldiers led by General Flynn,” Donavan said. “For weeks, Flynn, Powell, and Wood were priming people for actions. When all legal options were exhausted, it became proof of their beliefs”

January 12, 2021: The Wall Street Journal reported: “YouTube Suspends President Trump’s Account” It was written by Georgia Wells.

Youtube suspended President Trump’s channel on Tuesday night, joining a growing list of companies that are ejecting him from their platforms.

The Alphabet Inc. video-sharing service said it was locking Mr. Trump’s channel for at least seven days after the company removed videos that it said violated its policies against content it believes could incite violence.

YouTube’s move follows similar decisions from Facebook Inc. and Twitter Inc. On Thursday, Facebook suspended Mr. Trump’s account indefinitely and on Friday, Twitter locked Mr. Trump’s personal account.

January 12, 2021: The Wall Street Journal posted: “Airbnb Cancels Reservations in Washington Area for Inaugural”

Airbnb said Wednesday that it will cancel reservations in the Washington, D.C., area during the inauguration week, citing guidance from federal and local authorities over concerns about fresh violence following the Capitol riot last week.

Airbnb said guests whose reservations are canceled will be refunded in full, and the company will also reimburse hosts in full.

Airbnb also said that after a check of Airbnb users it has “identified numerous individuals who are either associated with known hate groups or otherwise involved in the criminal activity at the Capitol Building” and has banned them from Airbnb.

The governors of Maryland and Virginia recently issued a joint statement with D.C., mayor asking people to stay away from the inauguration on Jan. 20.

January 12, 2021: NBC News posted: “GOP lawmakers call on Trump to take action, call off the violence at the Capitol” It was written by Rebecca Shabad.

Multiple Republicans are calling on Trump to step in and call for an end to the violence that pro-Trump supporters engaged in at the Capitol on Wednesday.

“Mr. President, @realDonaldTrump the men & women of law enforcement are under assault. It is critical you help restore order by sending resources to assist the police and ask those doing this to stand down,” tweeted Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla.

Rep. Mike Gallagher, R-Wis., tweeted, “We are witnessing absolute banana republic crap in the United States Capitol right now. @realDonaldTrump, you need to call this off.”

“I am appalled at what is occurring in the U.S. Capitol right now. President Trump needs to call for an end to this violence and permit Congress to facilitate a peaceful transition of power,” tweeted Rep. Mike Turner, R-Ohio.

A number of other Republicans condemned the violence on Twitter, but did not call on the president to take action. Democrats, meanwhile, accused Trump of inciting it.

The tweets came after Trump called on protestors at a rally in downtown D.C. to march to the Capitol. Well after the violence and chaos erupted at the Capitol, Trump tweeted, “I am asking for everyone at the U.S. Capitol to remain peaceful. No violence! Remember, WE are the Party of Law & Order — respect the Law and our great men and women in Blue. Thank you!

January 13, 2021: NBC News reported: “Federal officials with ATF uniforms are clearing the Capitol” It was written by Ginger Gibson.

Federal law enforcement officers are moving through the U.S. Capitol clearing out protestors.

Reporters barricaded in a workspace in the Captiol greeted the officers — who had uniforms from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms — as a sign that the building may soon be safe.

A security system inside the Capitol alerted everyone to shelter in space. Police have continue to say that those inside are the safest waiting where they are.

“Thank you for what your doing,” the reporters who remained locked inside said.

January 13, 2021: NBC News reported: “Improvised explosive device found at Capitol” It was written by Pete Williams.

At least one improvised explosive device was found on the Capitol grounds, several law enforcement officials told NBC News.

The explosive device was found outside a building, the officials said.

“Along with our law enforcement partners, FBI Washington Field Office responded to report of suspicious devices. The investigation is ongoing,” a spokesperson said.

January 13 2021: NBC News posted: “Lawmakers sheltering in place cheer news that National Guard troops are on the way” It was written by Rebecca Shabad.

Members of both parties who were locked down in a secure location at the Capitol cheered when House Democratic Caucus Chairman Hakeem Jeffries of New York and House Republican Conference Chairwoman Liz Cheney of Wyoming announced that the National Guard was on its way, a House member in the room said.

“We will return to the floor and do our job,” the member said.

Democratic Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam announced that he is sending members of the Virginia National Guard, along with 200 Virginia state troopers, to the Capitol.

GOP Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan also announced that he was sending troopers to assist D.C. and Capitol police.

January 13, 2021: The Wall Street Journal posted: “Biden Says He Hopes Senate Can Balance Impeachment Duties With Nation’s Business” It was written by Alex Leary.

President-elect Joe Biden did not take a clear stand on the House impeachment of President Trump but did ask the Senate to balance a potential trial with getting his nominations approved and moving an agenda that includes tackling the pandemic.

“Today, the members of the House of Representatives exercised the power granted to them under our Constitution and voted to impeach and hold the president accountable.” Mr. Biden wrote in a statement Wednesday night. “It was a bipartisan vote cast by members who followed the Constitution and their conscience. The process continues to the Senate.”

He continued: “This nation also remains in the grip of a deadly virus and a reeling economy. I hope that the Senate leadership will find a way to deal with their Constitutional responsibilities on impeachment while also working on the other urgent business of this nation.”

Mr. Biden has so far declined to endorse his party’s calls for impeachment, though he again denounced last week’s mob assault on the Capitol. “This criminal attack was planned and coordinated,” his statement read. “It was carried out by political extremists and domestic terrorists, who were incited to this violence by President Trump.”

Addressing the problems facing the country, he said: “I have often said that there is nothing we can’t do, if we do it together. And it has never been more critical for us to stand together as a nation than right now.”

January 13, 2021: NBC News posted: ‘It’s not protest. It’s insurrection’: Biden condemns violent storming of the Capitol. It was written by Lauren Egan.

President-elect Joe Biden forcefully condemned the pro-Trump mob inciting violence and causing chaos Wednesday on Capitol Hill.

“The words of a president matter, no matter how good or bad it is,” Biden said, before calling on President Donald Trump to give a televised address and demand “an end to this siege” by his supporters.

“It’s not protest. It’s insurrection,” Biden said.

January 5, 2025: Politico reported: “Donald Trump is about to get the Jan. 6 that he denied Biden” It was written by Kyle Cheney.

The transfer of power to Donald Trump is shaping up to be, well, peaceful.

No mobs are assembling to disrupt Congress’ Jan. 6 counting of electoral votes. No Democratic leaders are questioning the results of the election or concocting elaborate theories to thwart the outcome. The greatest risk of obstruction seems likely to come from a storm system threatening to dump a few inches of snow on the region overnight.

If all goes well as expected, by late Monday afternoon, Trump’s victor will be certified in a ceremony overseen by his vanquished rival, Vice President Kamala Harris, who will preside over the proceedings in her capacity as the president of the Senate. Harris has been clear she will administer a straightforward transfer of power. In doing so, she’ll follow in the footsteps of all vice presidents before her — including Mike Pence, who resisted Trump’s pressure to refuse to count electors from states Trump lost in 2020.

House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries drew Republican applause when he acknowledged Trump’s win Friday during a speech on the House floor.

“It’s OK,” Jeffries said in a moment of gallows humor directed at his GOP colleagues. “There are no election deniers on our side of the aisle.”

It’s the utter antithesis of the carnage unleashed four years ago, under clear blue skies, by thousands of Trump supporters, goaded by lies about a stolen election. Hundreds of them bludgeoned police offers guarding the Capitol as the mob fought to stop Congress from counting the electoral votes that would make Joe Biden president.

The attack spawned the largest-ever federal criminal probe, led to a grave criminal case against Trump, spawned a failed legal effort to remove him from the ballot, and defined the political climate of the last two election cycles. Democrats declared Trump a threat to democracy and the president-elect wielded the cases to rally his base and claim political persecution.

The meeting of the House and Senate this time, by contrast, is expected to be almost jarringly routine. Harris will convene the joint session at 1 p.m. Lawmakers of both parties will announce the certified electors from each state, and Harris will affirm they have been counted.

Though members have an opportunity to object to any electors for potential legal or constitutional defects, no Democrats have signaled they will do so, a many have disclaimed such an effort. Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), who lodged a token objection to Trump’s electors in 2017, said he would not repeat the move this time — and said Democrats would prioritize “standing by the constitutional order.”

Monday’s joint session is also the first governed by a 2022 law designed to prevent efforts to corrupt the transfer of power and limit the ability of lawmakers to mount challenges to the results. That law lowers the already slim odds of any objections that could hamper the proceedings.

Still, the general atmosphere of calm in Washington belies a deep, simmering tension between those who watched the nation’s democratic institutions buckle on Jan. 6, 2021, and those who hope to whitewash it — especially as Trump attempts to rewrite the history of the attack on the Capitol and prepares to pardon many of it perpetrators. The Justice Department has charged more than 1,500 people for their involvement in the attack, and more than 1,200 have pleaded guilty or been convicted.

Judges in the federal district court in Washington are marking the four-year anniversary of the attack by advancing more cases to trial and sentencing, leaning into their work despite the pressure to pause cases to await Trump’s clemency decisions.

U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth — an outspoken defender of the court’s work on Jan. 6 cases — has timed the sentencing of one prominent defendant to coincide with Congress’ joint session. U.S. District Judge Tayna Chutkan, who was once slated to preside over Trump’s criminal trial for charges related to his effort to subvert the 2020 election, is holding a hearing to prepare for a Jan. 6 trial next week. And U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta has scheduled a hearing in a lawsuit brought by members of Congress and Capitol Police officers against Trump over his role in stoking the violence four years ago.

Across the city, advocates for Jan. 6 defendants are planning a press conference to push Trump for sweeping pardons, even for those convicted of the most extreme violence against police. It’s a flex of the unlikely political clout that the defendants have built over the last four years as Trump linked his own battle against the justice system to theirs.

Others are planning a walk for Ashli Babbitt, the Jan. 6 rioter who was shot and killed by a Capitol Police officer as she attempted to breach a room adjacent to the House Chamber.

Republican leaders in Congress have no plans to mark the anniversary of the attack and House leaders have spent recent days instead vowing to investigate the Jan. 6 select committee that probed Trump’s role in the attack two years ago. Speaker Mike Johnson and top lieutenants asked out when Biden award the panel’s leaders — Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) and former GOP representative Liz Cheney — with prestigious Presidential Citizens medals. Trump, too, used the occasion to attack Cheney, a longtime political nemesis, and float her potential prosecution.

Amid it all are the Capitol Police, D.C. cops and Secret Service agents preparing to protect the Capitol on Monday and at Trump’s inaugurations two weeks later. Hundreds of them were at the Capitol four years earlier facing down the mob, wondering if they would get to go home that night.

Dozens have testified in trials of the Jan. 6 defendants who once opposed them, while describing under oath the chaos and fear they experienced — and often still live with.

“You ask these officers, ‘Do you have confidence today?’ said Capitol Police Chief Thomas Manger at a Friday press conference. “I was at a roll call at 7 o’clock this morning and I was talking to officers. I asked for a show of hands. “How many of you were here four years ago?’ About half of them raised their hand. The others have came here knowing exactly what they were getting into. And they’re here because they want to be, and if you ask most of them they were here because of Jan. 6. These are the officers that want to be on the front lines of what is happening here.”

“I call on this mob to pull back and allow the work of democracy to go forward,” Biden said, adding that “the words of a president matter.”

January 14, 2021: The Wall Street Journal reported: “Pence Says Americans Deserve Safe Biden Inauguration as FBI Warns of ‘Potential Armed Protests’ It was written by Nancy A. Youssef.

Vice President Mike Pence said Thursday that the American people “deserve” a smooth transfer of power, in remarks to leaders of some of the agencies in charge of security for the Jan. 20 inauguration in Washington.

“We are going to ensure that we have a safe inauguration, that President-elect Joe Biden, Vice President-elect Kamala Harris are sworn in as the president and vice president of the United States in a manner that is consistent with our history, with our traditions, in a way the gives honor to the American people and to the United States,” Mr. Pence said at a security briefing at the Federal Emergency Management Agency.

At the same meeting, leaders from other agencies involved in the security through Wednesday provided some details about their plans.

Gen. Daniel Hokanson, Chief of the National Guard Bureau, said there are currently 7,000 National Guardsmen in Washington and that figure would eventually reach 21,000.

Federal Bureau of Investigation Director Chris Wray warned of “potential armed protests” leading up to the inauguration, based in part, he said, on “an extensive amount of concerning online chatter.”

Mr. Wray also said that his agency had identified over 200 suspects from the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.

“We know who you are,” Mr. Wray said. “And FBI agents are coming to find you.”

January 14, 2021: NBC News reported: “Georgia Secretary of State Raffensperger evacuated from state Capitol Building” It was written by Phil McCauseland.

Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger was escorted out of the state Capitol building Wednesday in Atlanta, his office confirmed. About 150 protesters gathered outside the building, which remained largely empty.

The Legislature is not in session, and much of legislators’ work is being done from home because of the pandemic.

Raffensberger spoke with President Donald Trump on Saturday, during which Trump pressed him to “find 11,780 votes” to overturn the results of the presidential election in the state. Raffensperger said Monday that he never thought it appropriate to speak to Trump about the results.

January 14, 2021: NBC News reported: “Trump tells mob at Capitol ‘we love you’ but ‘go home’. It was written by Doha Madani.

President Donald Trump issued a short video to his Twitter account Wednesday urging his supporters to “go home” after a mob bypassed police to enter the Capitol building.

Trump continued to falsely assert that he won the presidential election by a “landslide” but told his supporters that they must leave. He also reiterated his baseless allegation that the election was “stolen.”

He then told his supporters that they are “very special” and that he loved them.

“It was a landslide election, everyone knows it … but you have to go home now,” Trump said. “We have to have peace, we have to have law and order, and we have to respect our great people in law and order. We don’t want anyone hurt.”

Trump spoke to a large crowd of his supporters in front of the White House earlier Wednesday before the beginning of a joint session of Congress to count Electoral College votes, where he encouraged his followers to go to the Capitol. Trump also suggested that he would go himself.

Twitter added a flag to Trump’s tweet saying that it cannot be retweeted, liked, or replied to “due to a risk of violence.”

The video was posted just moments after President-elect Joe Biden urged Trump to “step up” and called for chaos unfolding at the Capitol an “insurrection.”

January 14, 2021: NBC News reported: “Twitter limits engagement on Trump tweets; YouTube, Facebook remove video. It was written by Ben Collins.

Twitter took the extraordinary step Wednesday of prohibiting one of President Donald Trump’s tweets from being retweeted or replied to after he posted a video pushing conspiracy theories about election fraud while some of his supporters took over the U.S. Capitol.

The tweet included a video in which Trump reiterated evidence-free claims that the election was “stolen” but also called for his supporters to “go home now.”

Twitter turned off retweets and replies to the tweet.

“In regard to the ongoing situation in Washington, D.C., we are working proactively to protect the heath of the public conversation occurring on the service and will take action on any content that violates the Twitter Rules,” Twitter’s Safety team said in a statement.

“Threats of and calls to violence are against the Twitter Rules, and we are enforcing our policies accordingly,” the safety team said. “In addition, we have been significantly restricting engagement with Tweets labeled under our Civic Integrity Police due to the risk of violence. This means these labeled Tweets will not be able to be replied to, Retweeted, or liked.”

The same video was removed from YouTube early Wednesday night. The company said in a statement that the video violated “policies regarding content that alleges widespread fraud or errors changed the outcome.” Facebook also took it down.

The video was tweeted at 4:17 p.m., about three hours after Trump told his supporters to march on the Capitol. The Capitol building was eventually evacuated after protesters stormed the building, some taking pictures from the dais and Senate offices.

January 14, 2021: NBC News reported: “Demonstrators who stormed U.S. Capitol face potential federal charges” It was written by Ari Melber and Diana Marinaccio.

Demonstrators who stormed the U.S. Capitol amid pro-Trump protests could face a potential legal exposure to federal crimes. Here is an explainer of possible charges.

Trespassing: A federal petty misdemeanor that applies to persons who enter or remain in any building they are not licensed to enter.

Entering a restricted government building: This misdemeanor applies to anyone who knowingly enters a restricted government building or engages in disorderly conduct near a restricted government building that impedes government business.

Entering a restricted government building with a weapon or causing injury: This is a felony that applies to persons who violate the above misdemeanor and do so either with a firearm or deadly weapon or with further action that results in serious bodily harm.

Physical damage to government property: A misdemeanor if someone damages government property up to $1,000 and a felony for over $1,000.

Misdemeanors carry fines and up to a year in prison. The felony counts listed carry maximum prison terms of 10 years.

January 14, 2021: NBC News reported: “Sen. Jeff Merkley says staffers saved Electoral College ballots from being ‘burned by the mob” It was written by Rebecca Shabad.

Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., tweeted Wednesday evening that Electoral College ballots were rescued from the Senate floor before protestors were able to get to them.

“If our capable floor staff hadn’t grabbed them, they would have been burned by the mob,” he tweeted.

January 14, 2021: NBC News reported: “GOP-allied business groups joins calls for Pence to consider invoking 25th Amendment” It was written by Ben Kamisar.

The head of the National Association of Manufacturers has called on Vice President Mike Pence to consider removing President Donald Trump from officer for inciting the rioting seen inside the Capitol on Wednesday.

Jay Timmons, the association’s president and CEO, blasted the “armed violent protestors who support the baseless claim by outgoing president Trump that he somehow won an election that he overwhelmingly lost.”

Timmons is a former high-level Republican congressional aide who led the National Republican Senatorial Committee in 2004.

“Throughout this whole disgusting episode, Trump has been cheered on by members of his own party, adding fuel to the distrust that has enflamed violent anger. This is not law and order. This is chaos. It is mob rule. It is dangerous. This is sedition and should be treated as such,” Timmons said in a statement released by the association.

“The outgoing president incited violence in an attempt to retain power, and any elected leader defending him is violating their oath to the Constitution and rejecting democracy in favor of anarchy. Anyone indulging conspiracy theories to raise campaign dollars is complicit. Vice President Pence, who was evacuated from the Capitol, should seriously consider working with the Cabinet to invoke the 25th Amendment to preserve democracy.”

Under the 25th Amendment, the vice president and a majority of the Cabinet can declare that the president is “unable to discharge his powers and the duties of his officers,” which would lead to the vice president replacing him. This scenario is unlikely.

The association represents the manufacturing sector’s interests in Washington, billing itself as the largest manufacturing association. Some of the group’s leaders also have close ties to the GOP, having previously worked for Republican members or causes.

Trump Lawsuits 0 comments on Insurrectionists Are Facing Consequences – Part 9

Insurrectionists Are Facing Consequences – Part 9

photo of the US Capitol by Cole Miller on Unsplash

Those who attacked their own nation’s Capitol failed to consider the consequences of doing so. This is part 6.

On January 6, 2021, a mob of Donald Trump supporters staged an insurrection at the U.S. Capitol building. The Guardian reported that people stormed the chambers of the House and Senate while the Electoral College does were being tallied.


Former Texas Police Officer

December 10, 2021: Houston Public Media reported: “Former HPD officer sentenced to 45 days in jail for his role in the U.S. Capitol insurrection.” It was written by Lucio Vasquez.

A former Houston police officer on Friday was sentenced to 45 days in jail for his involvement in the U.S. Capitol insurrection.

Eighteen-year HPD veteran and Richmond resident Tam Dinh Pham Pham was arrested on January 20 and initially charged with knowingly entering or remaining in any restricted building or grounds without lawful authority, and violent entry and disorderly conduct on Capitol grounds.

On Sept 20, Pham entered an agreement, pleading guilty to parading, demonstrating, or picketing in a Capitol Building.

In an affidavit filed with the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, Pham was accused of entering the Capitol building during the Jan. 6 riot after attending President Donald Trump’s rally in the morning.

Investigators say Pham admitted to climbing over fallen-over fences and passed through barricades as he made his way inside. Pham told investigators that he stayed inside the building for about 10 to 15 minutes before exiting, according to court records.

Police say Pham initially denied entering the Capitol building, but backtracked after photos and videos of what appeared to show Pham inside the building were found in his phone’s “recently deleted” photo album.

December 10, 2021: WUSA9 posted: “Despite ‘inspiring’ immigrant story, former Houston Police officer gets 45 days in jail for Capitol riot.” It was written by Eric Flack, Jordan Fischer, and Stephanie Wilson.

In what appeared to be to be a very close call for a federal judge, former Houston Police Officer Tam Dihn Phan was sentenced to 45 days in prison for his conviction on a misdemeanor charge from the January 6 Capitol riot.

“You added an air of legitimacy to what happens that day because you are a police officer,” U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelley told Pham.

Pham told WUSA “no comment” as he walked out of the federal courthouse after his sentencing Friday. He will have to self-surrender in his home state of Texas to serve his prison time.

A request from Pham’s attorney, Nicole Hochglaube, to have Pham spend 45 days in home incarceration instead of prison was denied by Kelley. Hochglaube said they respect the judge’s sentence.

“I think the judges have an important responsibility to weigh the sentencing issues, which the judge did,” Hochglaube said. “Mr. Pham is looking forward to serving his sentence and getting it behind him.”

Pham is seen in photos and videos spending about 20 minutes inside the Capitol during the Capitol riot. Questioned a week later by the FBI, Pham initially lied about being inside the Capitol building. Investigators checked his phone and found pictures taken inside the Capitol in the “deleted photos” folder of his device.

Pham, an 18-year veteran patrol officer with Houston Police, resigned his position shortly after that FBI interview — just two year shy of qualifying for a pension. In court, Hochglaube told the judge the Vietnamese man moved to the U.S. penniless in 1991 and loved the country that helped him to build a life and a career.

Pham broke down in tears as he addressed Kelly before sentencing.

“The day I was on the news my sister in Vietnam called and said the whole village watched me. I lost my reputation and my career and brought shame on my family especially my children,” Pham said. “The U.S. has given me so many opportunities. I’m so sorry for what I did.”

Kelley told Pham he strongly considered giving him probation, noting that, overall, he played a minor role in the riot and lost his job and pension as a consequence. But Kelly was bothered by Pham’s seeming unwillingness to take full responsibility for his actions.

Pham repeatedly told the court he “stupidly followed people in the Capitol.”

Kelley said as a police officer, Pham knew he was breaking the law.

“Your immigrant story is inspiring. I have no doubt you love this country,” Kelley said. “But you violated your sworn duties to uphold the Constitution and you added an air of legitimacy to what happened that day because you are a police officer.”

Pham will have to pay $500 in restitution and a $1,000 fine in addition to his prison sentence.”

January 19, 2021: KHOU-11 posted: A federal judge set bond Thursday at $50,000 for the former Houston police officer accused of taking part in the deadly U.S. Capitol riot.

The judge also ordered Tam Dihn Pham to surrender his U.S. and Vietnam passports and to not have any communication with law enforcement and anyone who is a victim or witness in the case.

Pham turned himself in on Wednesday, according to his attorney.

Pham is charged with violent entry and disorderly conduct on Capitol grounds and unlawfully entering a restricted building. He’s expected to be released after appearing before a federal magistrate.

According to a federal warrant, Pham initially denied he was part of the pro-Trump mob the stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6. But FBI agents say he confessed when they found deleted cell phone photos of him inside the building.

Attorney Nicole DeBorde said Pham is cooperating and “feels a great deal of shame for what happened” and believes President Joe Biden won the election, unlike other rioters.

“He went to see the last speech that President (Donald) Trump was giving and then ultimately ended up getting swept up in the crowd that moved from the speech down the mall to the Capitol,” DeBorde said.

Deborde said Pham wants to disassociate himself from what took place.

“I want to make it clear that Mr. Pham is a very devout Buddhist and is a very peaceful man,” she said.

In a statement, Houston Police Chief Art Acevedo said Pham’s record while serving on HPD will be scrutinized.

“We are also auditing arrests made by this former officer to ensure there are no irregularities, to include the review of his body worn camera footage related to his arrests,” the statement said. “While our community and members of our department are understandably upset about this breach of trust, all should be heartened by our swift, decisive, and transparent action.”

The investigation into Pham’s actions at the Capitol began after Acevedo received a tip.

During an interview at his Richmond home, Pham told FBI agents he went to Washington D.C. on a “business trip” with his wife and a friend. He said he went to the Trump rally to “see history.”

He admitted he followed the crowd to the Capitol, climbing over downed fences and going around barricades, according to the document.

While inside the building, Pham said “he looked at historical art” and took photos and videos.

FBI agents say he gave them permission to digitally copy those photos and videos.

One photo shows Pham standing next to a statue and under a Trump flag with an expletive. Others show him with the Capitol Rotunda in the background.

“The metadata associated with each of these photographs indicate that they were created on January 6, 2021 between 2:50 and 2:55 p.m., the document states.

Five people died during the riot, including a Capitol police officer.

Pham was placed on administrative leave last week and later resigned.

Attorney Nicole DeBorde’s full statement:

“DeBorde says Pham has been fully cooperative, speaking with agents, and is expected to go before a magistrate in federal court IN HOUSTON soon (she didn’t know day or time) but will ultimately face charges in federal court in D.C. DeBorde says Pham is a quiet man, has a strong Buddhist faith, and feels a great deal of shame for what happened, as well as sad and ‘wishes he hadn’t been there.” DeBorde also says Pham believes Joe Biden won the election, and wishes him well. DeBorde also notes the charges Pham faces are-despite the extraordinary circumstances- are basically federal misdemeanors.

January 19, 2021: The Texas Tribune reported: “Federal officials charge former Houston Police officer for participating in U.S. Capitol riot” It was written by Duncan Agnew.

Federal agents have charged the former Houston police officer who allegedly joined a violent mob that invaded the U.S. Capitol with knowingly entered a restricted government building and engaging in disruptive and disorderly conduct, according to media reports Tuesday. An affidavit written by FBI Special Agent Amie C. Stemen named the previously unidentified officer as Tam Dinh Pham.

In a press conference last week, Houston Police Chief Art Acevedo sad he had notified federal authorities about Pham’s presence at the Capitol riot after seeing Facebook photos linking Pham to the pro-Trump supporters. Pham then agreed to meet with FBI agents at his home in Richmond on Jan. 12.

According to the affidavit published by media organizations, Pham told the agents that he had traveled to D.C. from Houston on Jan. 5 for his wife’s business trip. He initially denied entering the Capitol, but admitted to attending the Trump rally earlier in the day.

However, federal officers found photos of Pham standing in the Capitol rotunda in the deleted photos section of his phone. One agent warned Pham about making any false statements, and Pham agreed to cooperate for the rest of the investigation.

Pham also denied being a member of any far-right social media groups that had advertised the Jan. 6 rally, saying that he learned about the gathering on Facebook and attended because he wanted to “see history,” court documents show. After the president’s speech to the crowd that morning, he followed others to the Capitol, eventually climbing over toppled fences and barricades along the way. The photographs on Pham’s phone place him in the rotunda between 2:50 and 2:55 p.m. Eastern Time on Jan. 6.

Pham told FBI agents that he spent about 15 minutes inside the Capitol where “he looked at historical art on the walls and took photographs and videos inside.”

Acevedo announced last Thursday that Pham had resigned pending the federal investigation.

Since last week, political news site The Appeal has been tracking law enforcement officers who participated in the pro-trump riot that left five people dead. As of Tuesday, the site has identified over 30 offers from departments around the country who joined the mob at the Capitol.

The Washington Post also reported that ahead of President-elect Joe Biden’s inauguration on Wednesday, federal authorities are currently in the process of screening troops from the National Guard for any connections for extremist groups, a choice that Gov. Greg Abbott quickly decried on Twitter.

“This is the most offensive thing I’ve ever heard,” Abbott tweeted. “No one should ever question the loyalty or professionalism of the Texas National Guard. I authorized more than 1,000 to go to D.C. I’ll never do it again if they are disrespected like this.”

As part of this security screening process, officials have removed 12 members of the National Guard from helping secure Biden’s inauguration, the Associated Press reported Tuesday. All 12 troops either had links to far-right extremist groups, or had posted violent or extreme views on online platforms. It’s not know what units the 12 members served in.

June 23, 2023: WUSA9 posted: “Rioter among first to enter US Capitol sentenced to 45 years in prison.” It was written by Jordan Fischer and Stephanie Wilson.

In what appeared to be a very close call for a federal judge, former Houston Police Officer Tam Dion Pham was sentenced to 45 days in prison Friday for his conviction on a misdemeanor charge from the January 6, Capitol riot.

“You added an air of legitimacy to what happened that day because you are a police officer,” U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelley told Pham.

Pham told WUSA9 “no comment” as he walked out the federal courthouse after his sentencing Friday. He will have to self-surrender in his home state of Texas to serve his prison time.

A request from Pham’s attorney, Nicole Hochglaube, to have Pham spend 45 days in home incarceration instead of prison was denied by Kelley. Houchglaube said they resect the judge’s sentence.

“I think the judges have an important responsibility to weigh the sentencing issues, which this incarceration instead of prison was denied by Kelley. Hochglaube, to have Pham spend 45 days in home incarceration instead of prison was denied by Kelley. Hochglaube said they respect the judge’s sentence.

“I think the judges have an important responsibility to weigh the sentencing issues, which this judge did not,” Hochglaube said. “Mr. Pham is looking forward to serving his sentence and getting it behind him.”

Pham is seen in photos and videos spending about 20 minutes inside the Capitol during the Capitol riot. Questioned a week later by the FBI, Pham initially lied about being inside the Capitol building/ Investigators checked his phone and found pictures taken inside the Capitol in the “deleted photos” folder of his device.

Pham, an 18-year veteran patrol officer with the Houston Police, resigned his position shortly after that FBI interview — just two years shy of qualifying for a pension. In court, Hochglaube told the judge the Vietnamese man moved to the U.S. penniless in 1991 and loved the country that helped him build a life and a career.

Pham broke down in tears as he addressed Kelley before sentencing.

Pham repeatedly told the court he “stupidly followed people in the Captol.”

Kelley said as a police officer, Pham knew he was breaking the law.

“Your immigrant story is inspiring. I have no doubt you love this country,” Kelley said. “But you violated your sworn duties to uphold the Constitution and you added an air of legitimacy to what happened that day because you are a police officer.”

Pham will have to pay $500 in restitution and a $1,000 fine in addition to his prison sentence.


Colorado Man Asked Judge To Distance Himself From Other Insurrectionists

December 9, 2021: WUSA9 posted: “Alleged Insurrection from Colorado wants out of jail to get away from other accused insurrectionists” It was written by Erin Powell.

A Coloradan accused of violence during the insurrection at the U.S. Capitol has asked to be released from jail to distance himself from other accused insurrectionists.

Robert Gieswein, of Woodland Park, petitioned the court in the week before Thanksgiving asking for reconsideration of his status before trial. Court documents say Gieswein and others arrested after the events on Jan. 6 are “vulnerable to radicalization” by remaining together.

…”Mr. Gieswein, a very young man who came to the District alone, is now trapped in a highly charged environment that could potentially exert undue influence on his thinking, and may eventually create pressure on him to conform, or to allow others’ political narratives to drive his thinking and decision-making,” his lawyers said.

In a handwritten letter to the judge, Gieswein himself said the would like to be released to live with his godparents to help his family financially and separate himself from the environment.

“That fact is that January 6 was one crazy day with many elements, and I will never put myself into a situation like that again,” he wrote. “… to spend every day in here like Groundhog’s Day … It is natural in this environment for the conversation always to turn to January 6, and for us to look to each other for strength.

Geiswein is accused of attacking police and spraying them with a chemical during the attempted coup that happened as Congress was set to certify the results of the presidential election He’s accused of being one of the first rioters to enter the capitol, dressed in military gear and carrying a baseball bat.

In court documents, Gieswein’s attorneys also raised a concern about a prison incident in which inmates allegedly got sick after guards use an irritant spray to subdue another inmate.

A hearing to consider his request hasn’t been scheduled yet.

June 23, 2023: United States Attorney’s Office District of Columbia posted: Colorado Man Sentenced For Assault On Law Enforcement

Defendant Assaulted Numerous Officers with an Aerosol Irritant

A Colorado man was sentenced to prison today for assaulting law enforcement officers during the breach of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. His actions and the action of others disrupted a joint session the U.S. Congress convened to ascertain and count the electoral votes retailed to the 2020 presidential election.

Robert Gieswein, 26, of Woodland Park, Colorado, was sentenced to 48 months in prison for two counts of assaulting, resisting, or impeding officers. In addition to the prison term, U.S. District Court Judge Trevor N. McFadden ordered 36 months of supervised release.

According to court documents, on Jan. 6, 2021, Gieswein encountered a small group of Proud Boys in downtown Washington, D.C. Gieswein was dressed in a camouflage paramilitary kit, and he was carrying a baseball bat. These individuals invited Gieswin to stay with them throughout the day.

At some point, one of the Proud Boys members gave Gieswein a piece of orange duct tape on his helmet for the purpose of identifying him as a “friendly.” Gieswein walked with the small group of Proud Boys to the area surrounding the Washington Monument, where he encountered a large group of individuals who identified as Proud Boys members, as well as others.

Shortly after 10 a.m., Gieswein marched with the group of Proud Boys from the Washington Monument to the Capitol. After marching with the Proud Boys for nearly three hours, Gieswein arrived at the Peace Monument shortly before 1:00 p.m. A large mob, including the defendant, rushed into the restricted area with other rioters in, among other things, pushing on a barricade held by police that they were using to set a line between themselves and the rioters.

Gieswein was stopped by a man with a microphone and asked how he was doing. In response, Gieswein stated, among other things, that “this” was “crazy,” and that he “would die for this.” Asked what the solution was to “this right here,” Gieswein stated, to “execute these fascists.” Moments prior to making the statement, the defendant threw a water bottle at a line of police officers.

Shortly before 2:00 p.m., the crowd pushed up the stairs under the Inauguration scaffolding that led from the west plaza to the upper west terrace, and Gieswein joined in this push. At the top of the stairs, the defendant sprayed an aerosol irritant at three members of the U.S. Capitol Police, who were attempting to prevent the crowd from further advancing toward the Capitol building.

At approximately 2:34 p.m., the defendant sprayed his aerosol substance at a group of officers who were in the processor arresting another rioter. At least one officer was hit by the spray and experienced a bodily injury. In response, officers attempted to arrest Gieswein, and a scuffle ensued. Gieswein attempted to push at least one officer.

Inside the Rotunda, shortly after 3:00 p.m., Gieswein participated with other rioters in pushing against a group of police officers who were trying to prevent rioters from advancing up a hallway that led to the House Speaker’s office. Gieswein and others were unable to break through the line of officers and were pushed back into the Rotunda. Shortly thereafter, the defendant exited the Capitol.

This case was prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia and the Department of Justice National Security Division’s Counterterrorism Section. Valuable assistance was provided by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Colorado.

This case was investigated by the FBI Denver Field Office and the FBI’s Washington Field Office, which identified Gieswein as #10 in its seeking information photos. Valuable assistance was provided by the Metropolitan Police Department and the U.S. Capitol Police.

In the 20 months since Jan. 6, 2021, more than 1,000 individuals have been arrested in nearly all 50 states for crimes related to the breach of the U.S. Capitol, including nearly 350 individuals charged with assaulting or impeding law enforcement. The investigation remains ongoing.

April 20, 2022: Law & Crime posted: “Judge Warns Lawyer for Man Accused of Assaulting Police on Jan. 6: Your Client’s ‘Mouthing Off” Won’t End Well.” It was written by Marisa Sarnoff.

After a Colorado man accused of assaulting law enforcement on Jan. 6 indignantly disrupted his pretrial proceedings about his “First Amendment right” to speak on his own behalf, a federal judge informed his attorney that his client’s protections do not extend to ranting out of turn in a courtroom.

Accused police assailant Robert Gieswein “will be back in a loci in a second if he keeps mouthing off,” Senior U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan warned.

Already jailed pending trial, Gieswein faces multiple felony charges, including assaulting police officers, civil disorder, and obstruction of an official proceeding. Decked out in military-style gear including a helmet, goggles, and a tactical vest, Geiswein allegedly entered the Capitol through a broken window.

He allegedly sprayed law enforcement with a chemical spray and brandished a baseball bat as he and other supporters of Donald Trump overran police and swarmed the Capitol building a Congress was certifying Joe Biden’s win in the 2020 presidential election.

“Everyone in a Democratic Country Is Impacted by Terrorists Storming The Capitol”

According to Gieswein’s lawyer, Ann Mason Rigby, residents in the District of Columbia feel “victimized” and “targeted” by what happened on Jan. 6, and they are more invested in the outcome of Gieswein’s trial because “they know that the next Jan. 6” would also likely take place in the capital. Rigby made that point in seeking a change of venue for her client’s trial.

“Hundreds would say this was an attack on democracy, period, whether you live in D.C. or whether you live in Colorado or whether you live in Hawaii,” Sullivan said, explaining the government’s position. “So pursuant to your theory everyone in the country would be precluded from presiding over this case. There wouldn’t be a fair locale.”

“That is the government’s theory”, Rigbly agreed.

“It’s not far-fetched, Sullivan replied, adding: “Where in the continental U.S. or Hawaii can Mr. Gieswein get a fair trial, if not in D.C.?”

“In a city where a jury will not be made up of people who were directly impacted by Jan. 6,” Rigby started to reply.

“But the theory is that everyone in a democratic country is impacted by terrorists storming the Capitol,” interrupted Sullivan, a Bill Clinton appointee. “That is the government’s theory. The argument is this was the worst assault on democracy since the War of 1812.”

At this point, as Sullivan and Rigby were talking over each other, Gieswein jumped into the exchange.

“Your honor, I object to all of those comments there,” Geiswein replied.

After Sullivan said Gieswein “mouthing off” would land him behind bars, Gieswein reminded the judge that he was already incarcerated. Sullivan urged Rigby to talk to her client and cautioned Gieswein once again against speaking out in court.

“You have an excellent lawyer speaking for you,” Sullivan said.

“You’ve Got to Get a Hold of Yourself”

The judge softened his tone somewhat later in the hearing, telling Gieswein that he could end up hurting his own case.

“Trust me, Mr. Gieswein, if the case remains here — and I’m inclined to let it remain here — it’s going to be fair,” Sullivan said. “You’re going to have to get a hold of ourself. I don’t want any outburst during trial. I don’t want you to prejudice yourself before a jury that’s been selected.”

“I just feel I would like to speak in my case,” Gieswein replied. “I’m the defendant, I have a right to speak.”

“As smart as you are, you are not a lawyer, and you have these two brilliant lawyers representing you,” Sullivan said, referring to Rigby and Elizabeth Ann Mullin, who both work for the office of the federal public defender. “I have a job too, to save you from yourself,” Sullivan added.

“You’re not going to prejudice me,” the judge told the defendant. “You start exhibiting this conduct in front of a jury and you know, it’s not good. It’s not good for your presentation … Let your attorneys work for you. They’re brilliant. They’re hard working. They file motions for you at 10 or II:00 at night. That’s their job.”

Gieswein’s trial is set to start on October 24, having been continued from its original February date.

The defendant’s outburst aside, Sullivan said he was not included to grant the motion on Wednesday, suggesting instead that he would have an expanded void dire process to ensure that a fair jury was selected. He also wanted to give prosecutors the chance to respond to survey data filed by the defense in support of its argument that D.C. jurors would be prejudiced against Gieswein.

The rest of Wednesday’s hearing did not generally go in the direction Gieswein had perhaps hoped, as Sullivan denied three of his motions: a motion to dismiss two of the assault counts against him, a motion to dismiss the indictment on the grounds that his right to a speedy trial has been violated, and a motion to reconsider detention.

Geiswein was arrested in January of 2021 and has been in custody since then.

Sullivan disagreed with the arguments from Geiswein’s lawyers that the indictment against him failed to specify facts and details to meet the elements of the offense. He also noted that several other judges overseeing Jan. 6 cases denied motions to dismiss on similar grounds.

Sullivan said that while Gieswein had presented new information regarding his detention — specifically, information about poor conditions in the D.C. jail where he is housed — the judge did not find that those circumstances had a material effect on whether Gieswein would pose a danger to the community if released.

Regarding the speedy trial motion, Sullivan found that the pace of Gieswein’s case was not due to purposeful delay, or bad faith, and therefore that his right to a speedy trial was not being violated.

Toward the end of the hearing, prosecutors noted that the government had offered Gieswein a plea deal that would allow him to drop all but of the assault charges against him. Geiswein rejected that offer.

June 23, 2023: WUSA9 posted: “Rioter among first to enter US Capitol sentenced to 4 years in prison” It was written by Jordan Fischer.

A Colorado man linked to the Three Percenters movement was sentenced on Friday to four years in prison for assaulting police and entering the U.S. Capitol among the first group of rioters on Jan. 6, 2021.

Robert Gieswein, 26, of Divide, Colorado, appeared before U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden to be sentenced on Friday on two counts of assaulting a federal officer. As part of a plea agreement in March, prosecutor agreed to dismiss other charges of obstruction of an official proceeding, aiding and abetting destruction of federal property and entering and remaining in a restricted building with a dangerous weapon.

According to a statement of facts read in court, Gieswein — who prosecutors have linked to an anti-government Three Percenters movement — met up with a group of Proud Boys at the Washington Monument on Jan. 6, 2021, and then marched to the Capitol – where he assaulted police with chemical irritant multiple times before becoming one of the first rioters to enter the building through a broken window. Geiswein was clad in paramilitary gear and carrying a baseball bat at the time.

Once inside, Gieswein assaulted several more officers, including one who was attempting to arrest another rioter. Police tried to place Gieswein in custody but he managed to escape their grasp.

Photo from inside the Ohio Clock Corridor just outside the Senate Chamber show Gieswein standing next to Proud Boy Dominic Pezolla, who was convicted of multiple felony charges earlier this year, and just behind Douglas Jensen, an Iowa QAnon believer who was sentenced to five years in prison last year on multiple felony counts.

Prosecutors asked U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden to sentence Gieswein to five years in prison — approximately the same sentence McFadden had ordered for another defendant, Robert Morss of Pennsylvania, who was also convicted of assaulting police. McFadden said he thought the cases were comparable, but that Morss, a former U.S. Army Ranger, had exacerbating factor like wearing heavy body armor that did not apply to Geiswein.

McFadden instead sentenced Gieswein to 48 months, or four years, in prison. Gieswein will receive full credit for the approximately 29 months he’s already served in pre-trial detention since his arrest.

Before delivering his sentence, McFadden said he found it “disturbing” that Gieswein had headed straight to the Capitol on Jan. 6 without even attending former President Donald Trump’s speech. He said Geiswein’s conduct was among the most “violent, egregious and serious” of that day.

“I think in many ways your case is an exemplar of the dangers of a mob mentality,” McFadden said.

To date, more than 1,000 people have been sentenced in connection with the Jan. 6 assault on the Capitol. Of those, nearly 350 have been charged with assaulting, resisting or impending police, including approximately 109 who are accused of using a deadly or dangerous weapon or causing serious bodily injury.

June 23, 2023: 9News posted: “Colorado insurrectionist sentenced” It was written by Nate Lynn.

A Colorado man who assaulted law enforcement officers during the breach of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, was sentenced Friday to four years in prison.

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) said 26-year old Robert Gieswein of Woodland Park was also sentenced to three years of supervised release as well as restitution of $2,000 to the Architect of the Capitol after pleading guilty in March to two counts of assaulting, resisting or impeding officers.

According to court documents, Gieswein drove from Woodland Park to Washington. He was seen at public events in D.C. on Jan. 5, court documents say. In an interview on Jan. 5, Gieswein said he intended to keep President Donald Trump in power.

On the morning of Jan. 6, Gieswein met up with a group of Proud Boys members in downtown Washington, documents say, and marched from the Washington Monument to the Capitol.

While he was in the West Plaza, Gieswein was stopped by someone with a microphone and asked how he was doing. Geiswein stated, among other things, that “this” was “crazy,’ and that he “would die for this,” court documents say. When he was asked what the solution was to “this right here,” Gieswein stated to “execute these fascists,” court documents state.

Gieswein was part of a group of people who pushed their way up the Capitol steps and met a line of police officers who were trying to keep people out of the Capitol, documents say. He then sprayed the officers with an aerosol irritant, according to court documents.

Gieswein was one of the first rioters to reach the Capitol and enter the building, according to the DOJ.

Documents say Gieswein sprayed the aerosol irritant at three more officers before accessing the Rotunda.

After police blocked Gieswein and others from accessing then-Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi’s office, Gieswein left the Capitol building. He then drove back to Colorado, according to court documents.

He was indicted later that month after turning himself in to authorities in Teller County.

The DOJ said more than 1,000 people from nearly all 50 states have been arrested for crimes released to the insurrection, including nearly 350 people charged with assaulting or impeding law enforcement.

June 23, 2023: The Colorado Sun posted: “Woodland Park man sentenced to 4 years in prison for assaulting U.S. Capitol police officer during Jan 6. riot”. It was written by Olivia Prentzel.

A Woodland Park man, who pleaded guilty to assaulting a Capitol police officer during the Jan. 6 riots, was sentenced Friday to four years in prison.

Robert Gieswein, 26, will be required to serve the three years of supervised release after his prison sentence and pay $2,000 in restitution, according to federal court documents.

Gieswein is the latest Coloradan to be sentenced for his involvement in the 2021 Capitol breach. More than a dozen people from Colorado were charged with crimes in the Jan. 6 attacks.

Last month, a leader of the Oath Keepers, a far-right extremist group, was sentenced to 18 years in prison. The sentence for Stewart Rhodes was the longest so far in the federal investigation.

Gieswein faced four criminal charges, including assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers using a dangerous weapon. He was accused of encouraging other rioters to break into the Capitol through a broken window, intimidating and assaulting Capitol police officers with a baseball bat and spraying aerosol from a black canister toward officers. Investigators say he was part of the Three Percenters, an extremist far-right militia group.

In March, Gieswein pleaded guilty to two counts of assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers. Each assault charge carries a statutory maximum sentence of eight years in prison, in addition to financial penalties, according to the U.S. District Attorney’s Office.

A judge sentenced him to four years of prison and three years of supervised release for each count, which he can serve concurrently, according to court documents.

Prosecutors say Gieswein allegedly borrowed a baseball bat from another rioter after he heard people in the crowd talking about potential violent counterprotestors planning to attack Donald Trump supporters, such as himself. He said he wore a protective, military-style vest because he knew rallies for the former president could become violent.

“Admittedly caught up in the emotions and energy of the moment and falling prey to mob mentality, Robert stopped thinking rationally and accepted a can of pepper spray by an unknown protestor,” court documents stated. “Then, acting completely contrary to the character he displayed throughout his entire life up until this moment, Robert joined the large mob, and took aggressive actions toward some members of the police.”

Gieswein turned himself in at the Teller County jail Jan. 18, 2021, and has been in jail since.

In a memorandum filed by U.S. District Court last week, Giewswein’s attorneys wrote that he “lives with great regret for his actions and has accepted full responsibility for the crimes he committed on January 6, 2021.

In a handwritten letter, Gieswein said he had not planned to go to the Capitol or break the law on Jan. 6 after traveling from Woodland Park to D.C. to attend a rally for Trump.

“I was very emotional and I was not behaving appropriately,” he wrote. “It was not my intention to hurt the police. I was mad and wanted them out of the way.”

His attorney’s asked the judge to consider a time-served sentence followed by a period of supervised release.

The request was accompanied by letters from Gieswein’s mother and three friends, one of whom called him “one of the most empathic people I’ve ever met.”

“I made mistakes and I cannot explain why. I can say I am sorry and I am paying for it, Gieswein wrote to the judge. “I am so ready to get back to my mom and sister to care for them.”

June 27, 2023: Denver 7.com posted: “Colorado man sentenced for assaulting police during Jan. 6 attack on U.S Capitol. It was written by Stephanie Butzer.

A man from Woodland Park was sentenced to prison on Friday for his actions during the breach of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

U.S. District Court Judge Trevor N. McFadden sentenced Robert Gieswein, 26, to 48 months in prison for two counts of assaulting, resisting or impeding officers, plus 36 months of supervised release and $2,000 in restitution to the Architect of the Capitol, according to the U.S. Department of Justice.

Based on court documents, on Jan. 6, 2021, Gieswein was walking in downtown Washington, D.C. dressed in a camouflage paramilitary kit and carrying a baseball bat. He was approached by a small group of Proud Boys who invited him to stay with them for the day. One of them gave Gieswein a piece of orange duct tape to put on his helmet to signify that he was “a friendly,” according to the U.S. Department of Justice.

Gieswein walked with the Proud Boys to the Washington Monument, where a larger group of Proud Boys stood.

After 10 a.m., he marched with the group to the U.S. Capitol.

After nearly three hours of marching around the building, Gieswein arrived at the Peace Monument around 1 p.m. A large mob, including Gieswein, rushed the restricted area of the Capitol grounds and ultimately to the West Plaza. There, he and other rioters pushed on a police barricade, according to the U.S. Department of Justice.

“While in the West Plaza, Gieswein was stopped by a man with a microphone and asked how he was doing,” the U.S. Department of Justice said. “In response, Gieswein stated, among other things, that ‘this’ was ‘crazy,’ and that he ‘would die for this.’ Asked what the solution was to his ‘this right here,’ Gieswein stated, to “excuse these fascists,” according to the Department of Justice.

Shortly before 2 p.m., the crowd — including Gieswein — pushed up the stairs that led to the Upper West Terrace. At the top of the stairs, he sprayed an aerosol irritant at three members of the U.S. Capitol Police.

Gieswein continued to move with the crowd toward the Capitol building and encountered another line of officers trying to stop the group. Gieswein again sprayed his aerosol canister at the officers, according to the U.S. Department of Justice.

He was one of the first rioters to reach the façade of the building and saw the window next to the Senate Wing Door get breached around 2:13 p.m. He entered through that window. Around 2:29 p.m., he sprayed the aerosol at another group of officers.

He did this again at 2:34 p.m., as officers were arresting another rioter, according to the U.S. Department of Justice. They tried to arrest him and he attempted to punch one of the officers. He then broke free of the officers.

At 3 p.m., he, along with other rioters, pushed against a group of officers who were trying to prevent the rioters from moving up toward Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s office. The group was pushed back into the Rotunda.

At this point, Gieswein left the Capitol.

He was indicted in late January 2021. He was ordered to stay in jail the same week.

He was sentenced on Friday.

This case was prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia and the Department of Justice National Security Division’s Counterterrorism Section.

Since the Jan. 6 attack, more than 1,000 people have been arrested in almost every state for crimes related to the breach of the U.S. Capitol. Of those, 350 have been charged with assaulting or impeding law enforcement.

Gieswein is one of several Coloradans charged in connections with the Jan. 6 riot, and several others either traveled there from Colorado or were arrested in Colorado to face federal charges…


June 16, 2023: WUSA9 posted: “Judge Orders Former Oath Keepers, Latinos for Trump attorney restored to competency before trial”

A federal judge said Friday he would order former OathKeepers general counsel Kellye SoRelle restored to competency a week after the government and defense evaluators found she was not fit to stand trial.

SoRelle, an attorney and former Republican candidate for the Texas House of Representatives, was scheduled to begin trial next month with two members of the Oath Keepers militia. A federal grand jury indicted her in September on felony charges of conspiracy and obstruction for allegedly instructing members of the Oath Keeper, led by her then-boyfriend Stewart Rhodes, to destroy evidence after the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. SoRelle, who served also served as counsel for Latinos for Trump, was on Capitol grounds on Jan. 6, with Rhodes but did not enter the building.

Last week, both SoRelle’s attorney Horatio Aldredge and a Justice Department attorney informed U.S. District Judge Amit P. Mehta that separate evaluator hired by both parties had come to the conclusion SoRelle was not competent to stand trial. A report documenting the government’s evaluator’s findings was submitted to the court under seal this week. The specific nature of the findings was not disclosed.

On Friday, Metha said he would accept results from the evaluators and order SoRelle restored to competency. Both Aldredge and Assistant U.S. Attorney Kathryn Rakozcy agreed their reading of the federal statute governing competency to stand trial — 18 U.S. Code 4241 — required SoRelle’s treatment to occur in an in-patient setting.

Although competency restoration typically occurs while in the custody of the Bureau of Prisons, Metha, who has allowed SoRelle to remain out on personal recognizance since her arrest, was reluctant to order SoRelle detained.

He suggested parties explore other hospitalization options like St. Elizabeths Hospital in D.C. — although he questioned whether a non-D.C. resident would be able to receive treatment there. Aldredge said she was aware of a possible option in San Antonio, approximately an hour-and-a-half from SoRelle’s home in Texas. Within the Bureau of Prisons, the process normally takes up to four months to complete.

Metha ordered the parties to return for a status hearing in 60 days, and said he would change SoRelle’s conditions of release to require her to seek outpatient mental health treatment until a bed can be located for her at an in-patient facility.

SoRelle attended the telephonic hearing Friday via Zoom from what appeared to be the interior of a car, but did not speak during the proceeding.

Metha’s order means SoRelle will not appear alongside co-defendants Donavan Crowl and James Beeks at the trial scheduled to begin July 10. Both men face seven counts ranging from entering a restricted building to conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding for their alleged roles in the Capitol riot.

To date, at least 21 members of the Oath Keepers militia have been convicted at trial or pleaded guilty to charges in connection with Jan. 6. Eight, including the militia’s finder Stewart Rhodes, have been convicted of seditious conspiracy. Only one, Michael “Whip” Green — the militias operations leader on Jan. 6 — has not been convicted of at least one felony count. Rhodes was sentenced last month to 18 years in prison.

August 21, 2024:The Associated Press reported: “Attorney for far-right Oath Keepers Extremist group pleads guilty Capitol riot charges” It was written by Michael Kunzelman.

An attorney who represented the far-right Oath Keepers pleaded guilty on Wednesday to charges stemming from a mob’s Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol, including members of the extremist group.

Kellye SoRelle, who was general counsel for the antigovernment group and a close associate of its founder, is scheduled to be sentenced on Jan. 17 by U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta in Washington, D.C.

SoRelle, 45, of Granbury Texas, answered routine questions by the judge as he pleaded guilty to two charges: a felony court of obstructing justice and a misdemeanor count of entering and remaining in a restricted building or grounds. The felony carries a maximum prison sentence of 20 years, but her estimated sentencing guidelines recommend a maximum of 16 months behind bars.

SoRelle was arrested in Junction, Texas, in September 2022. Here case remained suspended for months amid questions about her mental health.

More than a year ago, medical experts concluded that SoRelle was mentally incompetent to stand trial. In November 2023, she reported to a federal Bureau of Prisons facility for treatment. Last month, Mehta ruled that SoRelle had recovered to an extent that she could understand the nature of her charges and could assist in her defense.

Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes is serving a 18-year prison sentence for orchestrating a plot to keep Donald Trump in the White House after the 2020 presidential election. After Rhodes’ arrest, SoRelle told media outlets she was acting as the president of the Oath Keepers in his absence.

SoRelle, a former Texas prosecutor, was photographed with Rhodes outside the Capitol on Jan. 6. As the riot erupted, she posted a chase message for the Oath Keepers that said, “We are acting like the founding fathers — can’t stand down. Per Stewart, and I concur.”

“Although SoRelle did not personally enter the Capitol Building on January 6, she understood the role those inside and outside the building, like herself, played in delaying the certification proceeding that had been taking place inside the Capitol,” a court filing accompanying he guilty plea.

The night before the riot, she joined Rhodes in meeting with other extremists group members in an underground garage in Washington, D.C The meeting also included former Proud Boys national leader Enrique Tarrio, who is serving a 22-year prison sentence for his role in a separate plot to stop the peaceful transfer of power from Trump to Joe Biden after the election.

During the trial for Rhodes and other Oath Keepers charged with seditious conspiracy, jurors heard testimony that SoRelle had a romantic relationship with Rhodes.

SoRelle pleaded guilty to obstructing justice for encouraging others to destroy electronic evidence of their participation in the plot. Two days after the riot, Rhodes and SoRelle both sent messages from her cellphone encouraging Oath Keepers to delete any incriminating evidence.

She was indicted on other charges, including conspiring with Rhodes and other Oath Keepers to obstruct Congress from certifying the Electoral College vote. But she did not plead guilty to the conspiracy charge.

August 21, 2024: United States Attorney’s Office District of Columbia posted: “Texas Woman Pleads Guilty to Felony and Misdemeanor Charges for Actions During Jan. 6 Capitol Breach”

WASHINGTON – A Texas woman pleaded guilty to felony and misdemeanor charges related to her conduct during the Jan. 6, 2021 breach of the U.S. Capitol. Her actions and the actions of others disrupted a joint session of the U.S. Congress convened to ascertain and count the electoral votes related to the 2020 presidential election.

Kellye SoRelle, 45, of Grandbury, Texas, pleaded guilty to a felony charge of obstruction of Justice — tampering with documents and a misdemeanor charge of entering and remaining in a restricted building or grounds before U.S. District Judge Amit P. Mehta will sentence SoRelle on Jan. 17, 2025.

According to court documents, SoRelle was an affiliate of the Oath Keepers and the Oath Keepers’ founder and leader, Elmer Stewart Rhodes, and is an attorney who has previously worked as a prosecutor in Texas. In the days following the 2020 U.S. presidential election, members of the Oath Keepers, a far-right militia group, led by Stewart Rhodes began discussing the necessity of opposing the transition of power from President Donald J. Trump to President-Elect Joseph R. Biden, Jr. This opposition extended to advocating for the use of force if necessary.

On Nov. 5, 2020, Rhodes sent a message to an encrypted group chat titled “Leadership intel sharing secured,” which included other key figures in the Oath Keepers organization, such as Kellye SoRelle. In his message, Rhodes emphatically declared, “We MUST refuse to accept Biden as a legitimate winner,” and further escalated the rhetoric by stating, “We aren’t getting through this without a civil war. Too late for that. Prepare your mind, body, spirit.”

While some members of the Oath Keepers distanced themselves from the group due to the increasingly violent and radical tone, like Kellye SoRelle, continued to collaborate closely with Rhodes. SoRelle, a Texas-based attorney who had become increasingly involved with the Oath Keepers, worked with Rhodes on various projects aimed at opposing the election results.

On Jan. 3, 2021, SoRelle traveled with Rhodes from Texas to Washington D.C., where they planned to be part of the Oath Keeper’s operation on January 6. During the journey, Rhodes purchased or picked up over $20,000 worth of firearms-related equipment. By morning of January 6, SoRelle and Rhodes were in the vicinity of the U.S. Capitol, ready to take part in the days events.

As the riot at the Capitol began to unfold, SoRelle messaged the “Leadership intel sharing secured” group at around 1:31 p.m., declaring, “We are acting like the founding fathers — can’t stand down. Per Stewart, and I concur.” Rhodes, for his part, directed his Oath Keeper followers to the Capitol, leading to at least 20 member of the group breaching the building. At approximately 2:12 p.m., SoRelle, Rhodes, and another Oath Keeper affiliate entered the restricted areas of the Capitol grounds. Video footage captured the group passing barriers that had been set up by law enforcement to protect the Capitol.

As she entered the restricted area, SoRelle live-streamed a video to Facebook, expressing her support for the actions of the rioters and urging others not to be afraid. She described the scene as one of the “coolest damn things” she had ever witnessed and framed the riot as a necessary step to prevent the United States from descending into communism and tyranny. SoRelle continued to document the riot over Facebook live-stream as she moved around the Capitol building with Rhodes and the other Oath Keeper affiliate. The group eventually made their way to the Upper West Terrace of the Capitol, where they watched as rioters continued to stream into the building.

As they stood on the terrace, another Oath Keeper affiliate remarked that the people inside the Capitol “gotta be shitting their pants right now.” SoRelle laughed and agreed, while Rhodes responded with the Latin phrase “Sic temper tyrannis,” which means “Thus unto tyrants,” a phrase famously shouted by John Wilkes Booth after he assassinated President Abraham Lincoln.

After the events at the Capitol, SoRelle joined Rhodes and other Oath Keepers for a celebratory dinner. During the dinner, the group received word that law enforcement was either arresting or searching for individuals involved in the Capitol attack. SoRelle, and the others then left the restaurant, returned to their hotel, packed their belongings, and regrouped at a nearby gas station.

At the gas station, Rhodes turned off his cell phone and handed it to SoRelle, fearing it might be tracked by law enforcement. He then left with another Oath Keeper affiliates to delete any evidence of their involvement in the January 6, events. In a Signal group chat named DC Op: Jan. 6 21,” SoRelle wrote, “Please delete any information you’ve posted regarding the DC op and your involvement. This thread will be deleted when possible.” She also relayed instructions from Rhodes to “clean up all your chats.”

SoRelle further directed: “YOU ALL NEED TO DELETE ANY OF YOUR COMMENTS ABOUT WHO DID WHAT,” explaining that only the comment authors could delete their posts. Oath Keeper members and affiliates complied, deleting messages, photographs, and videos from their devices that could serve as evidence of their participation in the Capitol attack.

The FBI arrested SoRelle on Sept. 1, 2022, in Junction, Texas.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia and the Department of Justice National Security Division’s Counterterrorism Section are prosecuting this case. The U.S. Attorney’s Offices for the Western and Eastern Districts of Texas provided valuable assistance.

This case is being investigated by the FBI’s Dallas and Washington Field Offices. Valuable assistance was provided by the U.S. Capitol Police and the Metropolitan Police Department.

In the 43 months since Jan. 6, 2021, more than 1,488 individuals have been charged in nearly all 50 states for crimes related to the breach of the U.S. Capitol, including nearly 50 individuals charged with assaulting or impeding law enforcement, a felony. The investigation remains ongoing.


Bedford County Man Charged With Assaulting Officer during breach of U.S. Capitol

August 18, 2021: WKRN.com reported: A Bedford County man has been arrested after federal investigators said he assaulted law enforcement during the breach at the U.S. Capitol earlier this year.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office said Ronald Colton McAbee, a 27-year-old man from Unionville, was arrested Tuesday on federal charges, including assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers inflicting bodily injury.

McAbee has also been charged with entering and remaining in a restricted building or grounds with deadly or dangerous weapon in connection with the riots in Washington D.C. on Jan. 6.

He made his initial appearance Tuesday in the Middle District of Tennessee.

No additional information was immediately released about McAbee’s arrest and the allegations against him.

Federal investigators said McAbee is one of more than 570 people arrested for crimes related to the breach of the U.S. Capitol.

February 29, 2024: WKRN reported: A man who was employed as a Middle Tennessee sheriff’s deputy when he assaulted police officers protecting the U.S. Capitol from a mob of Donald Trump supporters was sentenced on Thursday to nearly six years in prison.

Ronald Colton McAbee wore a bulletproof vest with two patches — one that said “SHERIFF” and another bering an insignia for the Three Percenters militia movement — when he stormed the Capitol on Jan. 5, 2021.

During a melee on the Capitol’s Lower West Terrace, McAbee dragged away an officer from a police line and punched another officer who tried to stop him.

McAbee said he never intended to “strike fear or be part of the chaos” on Jan.6, 2021. Neither officer assaulted by McAbee attended his sentencing.

“I wish they were here so I can tell them I’m sorry,” McAbee said before U.S. District Judge Rudolph Contreras sentenced him to five years and 10 months behind bars.

“I take attacks on law enforcement very, very, seriously, as I suspect you did before that day,” the judge told McAbee.

McAbe will get credit for the two years and seven months that he already has served in jail since his arrest.

Prosecutors recommended sentencing McAbee to 12 years and seven months in prison. Only six Jan. 6 riot defendants have received a longer prison sentence than that.

McAbee expressed condolences to the families of rioters and police officers who died on Jan. 6, 2021, and the days that followed. He performed CPR on Rosanne Boyland, a Georgia woman in the mob who died during the riot.

“I’m sorry for all the families that lost someone,” McAbee said.

However, the judge noted that McAbee appeared to be proud of his violent “exploits” on Jan. 6, 2021. A day after the riot, McAbee smiled and held a newspaper with the headline “INSURRECTION” as he posed for a photograph with a friend, prosecutors said.

McAbee was on medical leave from Williamson County Sheriff’s Office in Tennessee when he and a friend drove to Washington, D.C., and attended then-President Donald Trump’s “Stop the Steal” rally near the White House on Jan. 6, 2021.

McAbee wore brass knuckle gloves and a shirt bearing a Three Percenters emblem and slogans. Three Percenters refers to the myth that only 3% of Americans fought in the Revolutionary War against the British.

After watching rioters clash with police outside the Capitol, McAbee joined the fray near a tunnel leading to an entrance on the Lower West Terrace. Metropolitan Police Department Officer Andrew Wayte was on his back on the ground when McAbee grabbed one of his legs and dragged him away from his fellow officers.

“When other officers attempted to assist their fallen colleagues, McAbee interfered wit their efforts, cursing a theme and striking one of them,” prosecutors wrote in a court filing.

McAbee then lifted the officer up by his torso, causing him to cry out in pain before they sled together down a set of steps. He pinned the officer down for more than 25 seconds as other rioters attacked him and fired pepper spray at his face.

Defense attorney Benjamin Schiffelbein said McAbee was trying to alert police when he “briefly moved” Wayte and pointed at Boyland’s body.

“Mr. McAbee placed himself in an impossible situation: stand and watch as a woman lay dying in front of officers who did not notice her, or try to help her,” Schiffelbein wrote in a court filing.

A medical examiner’s office later determined that Boyland died from acute amphetamine intoxication.

After his attacks on police, McAbee “sought camaraderie and favor” from other officers still fighting off the mob.

“Can I get in?” he asked, tapping the “sheriff” path on his vest. “I can’t go back that way, man.”

Two men charged with McAbee were also convicted pf assailants Tom Wayte, whose injuries prevented him from returning for work for months. Justin Jersey, was sentenced to four years and three months in prison. The other, Clayton Ray Mullins, was sentenced to two years and six months of imprisonment.

McAbee previously served as a deputy for Cherokee County Sheriff’s Office in Georgia before leaving in November 2020 to join the Sheriff’s Office in Tennessee. McAbee worked for the Williamson County Sheriff’s office until March 23, 2021, according to prosecutors.

More than 1,300 people have been charged with Capitol-riot related federal crimes. Over 800 of them have been sentenced with roughly two thirds receiving terms of imprisonment ranging from a few days to 22 years.


Man Arrested After Sale of Metals to a Scrapyard

June 12, 2023: WUSA9 posted: “Metal sale leads to arrest of Indiana man on Capitol riot charges”. It was written by Jordan Fischer.

An Indiana man now charged with misdemeanors for his alleged role in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot was identified in part thanks to his sale of metals to a scrapyard.

William Lance Wilkerson was arrested last week in Mitchell, Indiana, on four misdemeanor counts for allegedly unlawfully entering the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6.

According to charging documents unsealed in federal court in D.C. on Monday, Wilkerson can be seen in surveillance footage entering the building through the Senate Wing doors at approximately 3:24 p.m., — a little more than half an hour after the second breach of that entrance. Investigators say Wilkerson then made his way to the Crypt before leaving the building approximately five minutes later.

While inside, Wilkerson was captured both on surveillance video and, as shown by images included in he charging documents, a live video being broadcast by right-wing streamer Tim “Baked Alaska” Gionet, that has helped investigators to identify numerous defendants. Gionet was sentenced in January to 60 days in prison after pleading guilty to a misdemeanor count of parading, demonstrating, or picketing in a Capitol building.

Although Wilkerson is visible in Gionet’s stream, it was surveillance video taken at a scrapyard in Bloomington, Indiana, that resulted in his arrest. Under Indiana law, valuable metal dealers must verify a driver’s license when receiving scrap metals. According to the charging document, Wilkerson visited JB Salvage Inc. at least four times — including at least one time in December 2020 in which he wore the same green jacket he was wearing on Jan. 6. Wilkerson was then identified to the FBI by an acquaintance of several years.

Investigators also found Willerson’s Facebook account, where he had posed photos of himself at the Capitol on Jan. 6 along with comments indicating his presence. In one post on Jan 7., 2021, Wilkerson wrote, “Real patriots did infiltrate the capitol. I watched it happen. The media is all lies unless they were there.”

As of Monday afternoon, an initial appearance in Wilkerson’s case has not been set.

More than 1,000 defendants haven been charged in connection with the Capitol riot. Of those, more than 580 have either pleaded guilty or been convicted at trial, including more than 430 defendants who have pleaded guilty to misdemeanor charges.

June 14, 2023: FOX59 posted: “Facebook posts, scrap metal sale leads to Indiana man’s arrest for his role in Jan. 6 Capitol riots”

An Indiana man was arrested last week in Lawrence County for allegedly participating in the US Capitol riots after federal agents found him selling scrap metal.

William Lance Wilkerson, a 39-year-old Bedford man, was arrested by federal agents on Thursday, June 8, in Mitchell after an FBI investigation revealed he was likely at the US Capitol in Washington, D.C., when over 2,000 stormed the building on Jan. 6, 2021.

The FBI investigation into the Lawrence County resident began just two days after the Jan. 6 storming when on Jan. 8, 2021, agents learned of posts on Wilkerson’s Facebook page that indicated he participated.

The Facebook profile, which had the name “Wm Lance Wilkerson” had posed several photos in Washington D.C. on Jan. 6, the FBI said. One of them was a selfie at the Washington Monument with the caption “I made it here showing my colors.”

Also on Jan. 6, the FBI said that Wilkerson made another post that read: “Standing up for your rights is also being part of the mass. I did my part today!”

The next day, on Jan. 7, 2021, the FBI said Wilkerson made another Facebook post directly discussing the Capitol riots. That post, provided by the US Justice Department, can be seen below:

“Real patriots did infiltrate the capitol. I watched it happen. The media is all lies unless they were there.”

Other incriminating posts from Wilkerson’s alleged Facebook account that the FBI cited were images saying that “Americans Are Pissed” and the “The Declaration of Independence Says We Have the Right to Overthrow the Government.” The FBI said Wilkerson followed up the post by saying: “IF THAT’S THE CASE, I GUESS NOBODY BROKE THE LAW (rubbing chin emoji).”

A review of CCTV security footage from the Capitol and social media posts also showed a man alleged to be Wilkerson multiple times inside and outside of the federal building.

After searching a US database, FBI agents said they identified the owner of the account as a “William Lance Wilkerson” that resided at a home address in Bedford. When comparing the recovered footage from the Capitol with Wilkerson’s driver’s license photo, the FBI said they were a match.

Further research on Wilkerson showed that he previously visited a salvage yard in Bloomington. When reviewing the security footage from the salvage yard, agents found video of Wilkerson selling scrap metal in what appears to be the same jacket he wore to the US Capitol.

In addition to this evidence, the FBI said that the driver’s license was scanned when the man above sold the scrap metal matched Wilkerson’s. Furthermore, agents said several witnesses who knew Wilkerson said that he had “expressed an intent” to join a rally in Washington, D.C.

This years-long investigation into Wilkerson led the FBI filing the following charges against him:

  • Knowingly entering a restricted building without lawful authority
  • Disorderly or disruptive conduct in a restricted building
  • Disorderly conduct in a Capitol building
  • Parade, demonstrate or picket in any of the Capitol buildings

Wilkerson was taken into custody by federal agents on June 8, 2023, at a residence in Mitchell, one day after a US Magistrate Judge in the nation’s capitol signed a warrant for his arrest.

November 20, 2023: Indiana Public Media reported: “Bedford man gets probation for role in Jan. 6 insurrection at U.S. Capitol” It was written by Patrick Beane

A Bedford man was sentenced to 24 months of probation and ordered to pay $510 in restitution and fees Monday for his role in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol.

William Lance Wilkerson, 38, was arrested in June and pled guilty in July to parading, demonstrating, or picketing in a Capitol building, a violation of Title 40, Section 5104(e)(2)(g) of the U.S. code.

According to unsealed charging documents, Wilkerson was spotted in surveillance footage entering the Capitol through the Senate Wing doors at approximately 3:24 p.m. He then made his way to the Crypt (a large circular room below the rotunda) before leaving the building five minutes later.

Although Wilkerson was visible in a video stream of the attack, he wasn’t identified until late last year when he was seen in surveillance footage selling scrap metal at JB Salvage in Bloomington.

In one of four visits to the site, Wilkerson was wearing the same green jacket he was wearing on Jan. 6.

According to the FBI, Wilkerson posted several photos in Washington D.C., on Jan. 6 on his Facebook page. One of them was a selfie at the Washington Monument with the caption, “I made it here showing my colors.” In another post on Jan 7, he wrote. “Real patriots did infiltrate the capitol. I watched it happen. The media is all lies unless they were there.”

He was initially charged with four counts, but three were dropped in the plea agreement. Wilkerson agreed to 30 days incarceration in that deal, but on Monday, that was reduced to two years of probation, with conditions.

December 16, 2024: IndyStar reported: “These are the Indiana residents charged in Jan. 6 riot who could be pardoned by Trump” It was written by Sarah Nelson.

President-elect Donald Trump has promised to pardon rioters accused in the Jan. 6, 2021 attack at the U.S. Capitol on his first day in office.

If he follows through, the move will affect at least 28 Hoosiers.

That’s how many Indiana residents have been charged in the massive investigation into the riot at the U.S Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, which has resulted in more than 1,000 arrests nationwide. Among the Indiana arrestees, 21 have been sentenced. Trump’s promise has already resonated with eat least one of them, a Bloomington man who’s publicly voiced that he’s banking on Trump pardoning him for his crimes and didn’t show up to serve his time.

“I’m going to look at everything. We’re going to look at individual cases,” Trump pledged in his “Meet the Press” interview.

It remains unclear who Trump may pardon, such as whether potential pardons will be awarded to those charged with violent crimes.

William Lance WilkersonFrom: Bedford

Charging documents show Wilkerson’s Facebook comments, security camera images from the Capitol and cellphone records led to his arrest in the Jan. 6 riot.

Closed-circuit television footage captured six photographs of him inside the building wearing an olive-green jacket.

He was sentenced in November 2023 to two years of probation after pleading guilty to parading, demonstrating or picketing in a Capitol building.


Patriot, Indiana, Woman Arrested In Capitol Riot

March 15, 2022: WISHTV.Com posted: “Patriot, Indiana woman arrested in Capitol riot” It was posted by Brady Gibson and Ashley Fowler.

Federal authorities have arrested a Patriot, Indiana, woman for her alleged role in the Capitol riot on January 6, 2021.

The FBI says Nancy Barron, 46, surrendered to federal agents this morning on four charges related to the siege at the Capitol, which happened while lawmakers were attempting to certify the 2020 presidential election results.

Federal investigations say Barron contacted them on her own Jan. 7, 2021, to say she had been inside the Capitol.

The FBI says it found multiple photos and videos of Barron inside and outside the building.

In one selfie video that lasts several minutes, agents say Barron can be seen walking through the Capitol and approaching the House Chamber doors.

At another point in the view, Barron is seen walking up a set of stairs asking, “Where is the F****** Pelosi?” and “Is this Pelosi’s stuff down here?”

At another point in the video, Barron is seen walking up a set of stairs yelling, “F*** Nancy Pelosi and f*** Chuck Schumer!”

An FBI Agent claims Barron lied during her official interview, claiming she was pushed into the building and that she tried to find an exit as soon as she was inside.

Barron is accused of the following:

  • Entering and remaining in a restricted building or grounds
  • Disorderly and disruptive conduct in a restricted building or grounds
  • Disorderly conduct in a Capitol Building
  • Parading, demonstrating, or picketing in a Capitol building

Federal prosecutors did not indicate that Barron had participated in any violence while inside.

May 2024: IndyStar reported: a federal judge sentenced Barron to three years on probation after a jury found her guilty of her charges in the Jan. 6 attack.

Investigators said Barron turned herself in after telling police she had entered the Capitol that day. She was then handed her numerous nonviolent charges, including entering and remaining in a restricted building or rounds, disorderly and disruptive conduct in a restricted building or grounds, disorderly conduct in a Capitol building and parading, demonstrating or picketing in a Capitol building.

August 29, 2023: WISHTV.COM posted: “Jury convicts Patriot, Indiana woman in January 6 Trial” It was written by Brady Gibson.

A federal jury has convicted a Patriot, Indiana, woman for her role in the January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol.

The jury found Nancy Barron guilty on all charges in the verdict returned Monday.

Federal authorities arrested Barron in March 2022 on four charges, including disorderly or disrupted conduct in a Capitol building, entering or remaining in a restricted building, and parading demonstrating or picketing inside a Capitol building.

Investigators said Barron contacted them Jan. 7, 2021, one day after the mob stormed the Capitol and disrupted the certification of the 2020 presidential election results. Barron admitted being inside the Capitol.

The FBI said it found multiple photos of Barron inside and outside the building.

In one video, she can be heard yelling “Go in” several times followed by “Charge” as rioters were trying breach the doors of the East Rotunda.

Another video on Facebook showed Barron smiling as she said “Made it in.”

At another point, Barron is seen in a video walking up a set of stairs yelling, “F… Nancy Pelosi and f…Schumer!”B

Barron was not charged with participating in any violent acts that day.

The judge in the case rejected Barron’s motions for a mistrial and for a directed verdict of acquittal.

Patriot is an Ohio River town of 200 residents that’s about an hours drive southwest of Cincinnati.


Indiana man arrested for assaulting Law Enforcement During January 6 riot

August 25, 2023: WISHTV reported: Federal agents arrested an Indiana man for assaulting police during the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot.

Curtis Tate, 32, of Jeffersonville, is also facing charges for civil disorder and destruction of government property.

Video shows Tate in restricted areas of the U.S. Capitol and using a metal baton to hit officers. It also shows him breaking a window, and throwing a speaker box, a broken table lamp, and a shoe at officers.

Police arrested Tate in North Carolina. That’s where he will make his first court appearance.

NEWS RELEASE: An Indiana man has been arrested on felony and misdemeanor charges, including assaulting law enforcement, related to his actions during the breach of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6 2021. His actions and the actions of others disrupted a joint session of the U.S. Congress convened to ascertain and count the electoral votes related to the 2020 presidential election.

“Curtis Logan Tate, 32, of Jeffersonville, Indiana, is charged in a criminal complaint filed in the District of Columbia with civil disorder, assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers using a deadly or dangerous weapon, and destruction of government property. In addition to the felonies, Tate is charged with several misdemeanor offenses, including entering or remaining in any restricted building or grounds, disorderly and disruptive conduct in a restricted building or grounds, engaging in physical violence in a restricted building or grounds, disorderly conduct in the Capitol grounds or buildings, and engaging in an act of physical violence in the grounds or any of the Capitol buildings.

“According to court documents, on Jan. 6, 2021, Tate attended a rally in Washington, D.C., and afterward made his way toward the U.S. Capitol building. A review of open-source video, body-work camera footage, and closed-circuit video showed Tate present at various locations in Washington, D.C., and in the restricted area of the U.S. Capitol grounds, including in the Lower West Terrace tunnel.

“At approximately 2:05 p.m., Tate is seen in body-worn camera videos from Metropolitan Police Department Officers (MPD) near the Lower West Terrace as he used a metal baton to strike an MPD officer in the hand. In response, an MPD officer sprayed Tate with pepper spray and can be heard warning another that Tate was wielding a baton. Tate later uploaded a video to a social media site depicting himself near Lower West Terrace holding a metal baton, which appears to be the same baton used to strike the MPD officer, with the caption: “POST 1ST MACING.’ During the video, Tate yelled “We’re tearing this motherfucker down!”

At approximately 2:43 p.m., Tate was outside the entrance to the Lower West Terrace tunnel. He arrived minutes after the area was first breached and entered the tunnel closely behind the initial group of rioters. Tate is later seen on Capitol CCTV footage inside the tunnel holding his cell phone above his head, consistent with using the phone to record video. At about 2:57 p.m., Tate is how inside the tunnel brandishing the metal baton above his head and charging towards the line of police officers protecting the entrance to the Capitol building. Tate then repeatedly struck a U.S. Capitol Police (USCP) officer in the helmet with the metal baton. In response, a USCP officer pepper sprayed Tate, and he retreated.

“Later, at about 4:28, p.m., Tate is seen on publicly available video through a black speaker box and breaking a window located to the left of the tunnel entrance. Tate then threw a black speaker box and shoe struck MPD officers. Shortly after the above assaults, Tate is shown in publicly available receiving a broken table leg with a protruding screw through a broken window in the Capitol building. The window was the same window damaged by Tate earlier with the speaker box and now completely broke as a result of damage caused by Tate and others.

“Tate is shown in multiple publicly available videos and photographs taken by a photojournalist, navigating through the crowd and carrying the broken table leg toward the entrance to the tunnel. At approximately 4:34 p.m., Tate is shown in publicly available video throwing the broken table leg at police officers who were protecting the tunnel entrance.

“Later, at approximately 4:38 p.m., Tate is shown in publicly available assisting others carry a piece of lumber toward the entrance to the tunnel, and, at abut 5:01 p.m., Tate is shown in multiple publicly available videos throwing a floor lamp at police officers at near the tunnel.”

“Tate later gave an interview to a media outlet, in which he stated, ‘I would never hurt an officer. I come from a military background. I’m very respectful of our military and police… I know I didn’t hurt anybody… I’m not speaking her bold as brass, because you never know what can happen… but I’ve never, ever once hurt, or put my hands on an officer… I never did it. So, I’m not going to live the rest of my life in fear.’

“This case is being prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia and the Department of Justice National Security Division’s Counterterrorism Section. Valuable assistance was provided by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Indiana, as well as the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of North Carolina.

“The case is being investigated by the FBI’s Indianapolis and Washington Field Officers, which identified Tate as BOLO (Be on the Lookout) #119 on its seeking information photos. Valuable assistance provided by FBI Charlotte, U.S. Capitol Police, and the Metropolitan Police Department.

“In the 31 months since Jan. 6, 2021, more than 1,106 individuals haven arrested in nearly 50 states for crimes related to the breach of the U.S. Capitol, including more than 350 individuals charged with assaulting or impeding law enforcement.

August 15, 2023: United States Attorney’s Office District of Columbia posted a press release titled: “Indiana Man Arrested for Assaulting Law Enforcement During Jan. 6 Capitol Breach”

Defendant Assaulted Police on West Terrace and in Tunnel with Baton and Thrown Object

An Indiana man has been arrested on felony and misdemeanor charges, including assaulting law enforcement, related to his actions during the breach of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6 2021. His actions and the actions of others disrupted a joint session of the U.S. Congress convened to ascertain and count the electoral votes related to the 2020 presidential election.

Curtis Logan Tate, 32, of Jeffersonville, Indiana, is charged in a criminal complaint filed in the District of Columbia with civil disorder, assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers using a deadly or dangerous weapon, and destruction of government property. In addition to the felonies, Tate is charged with several misdemeanor offenses, including entering or remaining in any restricted building or grounds, disorderly and disruptive conduct in a restricted building grounds, engaging in physical violence in a restricted building or grounds, engaging in physical violence in a restricted building or grounds, disorderly conduct in the Capitol grounds or buildings, and engaging in a fact of physical violence in the grounds or any of the Capitol buildings.

Tate was arrested on Aug. 24, 2023, by the FBI in Wilmington, North Carolina, and will make his initial appearance in the Eastern District of North Carolina.

According to court documents, on Jan. 6, 2021, Tate attended a rally in Washington, D.C., and afterward made his way toward the U.S. Capitol building. A review of open-source video, body-worn camera footage, and closed-circuit video shows Tate at various locations in Washington, D.C., and in the restricted area of the U.S Capitol grounds, including in the Lower West Terrace tunnel.

At approximately 2:05 p.m., Tate is seen in body-warn camera videos from Metropolitan Police Department Officers (MPD) near the Lower West Terrace as he used a metal baton to strike an MPD officer in the hand. In response, an MPD officer sprayed Tate with pepper spray and can be heard warning another officer that Tate was wielding a baton. Tate later uploaded a video to a social media site depicting himself near the Lower West Terrace holding a metal baton, which appears to be the same baton used to strike the MPD officer, with the caption: “POST 1ST MACING.” During the video, Tate yelled, “We’re tearing this motherfucker down!”

At approximately 2:43 p.m., Tate was outside the entrance to the Lower West Terrace tunnel. He arrived minutes after the area was first breached and entered the tunnel closely behind the initial group of rioters. Tate is later seen on Capitol CCTV footage inside the tunnel holding his cell phone above this head, consistent with using the phone to record video. At about 2:57 p.m., Tate is shown inside the tunnel brandishing the metal baton above his head and charging towards the line of police officers protecting the entrance to the Capitol building. Tate then repeatedly struck a U.S. Capitol Police (USCP) officer in the helmet with the metal baton. In response, a USCP officer pepper sprayed Tate, and he retreated.

Later, at about 4:28 p.m., Tate is seen on publicly available video throwing a black speaker box and breaking a window locked to the left of the tunnel entrance. Tate then threw a black speaker box and a shoe at police officers protecting the entrance to the tunnel. The speaker box and shoe structure MPD officers. Shortly after the above assaults, Tate is shown in publicly available video receiving a broken table leg with a protruding screw through a broken window in the Capitol building. The window was the same window damaged by Tate earlier with the speaker box and now was completely broken as a result of damage caused by Tate and others.

Tate is shown in multiple publicly available videos and photographs taken by a photojournalist, navigating through the crowd and carrying the broken table leg toward the entrance to the tunnel. At approximately 4:34 p.m., Tate is shown in publicly available video throwing the broken table leg at police officers who were protecting the tunnel.

Later, at approximately 4:38 p.m., Tate is shown in publicly available video assisting others carry a piece of lumber toward the entrance to the tunnel, and, about 5:01 p.m., Tate is shown in multiple publicity available videos throwing a floor lamp at police officers near the tunnel.

Tate later gave an interview to a media outlet, in which he states, “I would never hurt an officer. I come from a military background. I’m very respectful of our military and police… I know I didn’t hurt anybody … I’m not speaking here bold as brass, because you never know what can happen…but I’ve never, ever once hurt, or put my hands on an officer… I never did it. So, I’m not going to live the rest of my life in fear.”

This case is being prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia and the Department of Justice National Security Division’s Counterterrorism Section. Valuable assistance was provided by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Indiana, as well as the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of North Carolina.

This case is being investigated by the FBI’s Indianapolis and Washington Field Offices, which identified Tate as BOLO (Be on the Lookout) #119 on its seeking information photos. Valuable assistance provided by FBI Charlotte, U.S. Capitol Police, and the Metropolitan Police Department.

In the 31 months since Jan. 6, 2021, more than 1,106 individuals have been arrested in nearly all 50 states for crimes related to the breach of the U.S. Capitol, including more than then 350 individuals charged with assaulting or impeding law enforcement.


Behymer and Moss

March 16, 2023: WISHTV.com reported: “Indiana Couple arrested for actions during Jan. 6 Capitol Breach” It was written by Jay Adkins and Richard Essex.

An Indiana couple were arrested today on felony and misdemeanor charges for their action during the U.S. Capitol breach on Jan. 6, 2021.

Arthur Rehyer and Jessica Rehyer, both 38, of Brownsburg, Indiana, were arrested Wednesday morning after being charged with civil disorder, a felony, and related misdemeanor offenses.

According to documents filed in federal court by the U.S. district attorney for the District of Columbia, the Reyhers were among the first group of rioters to enter the tunnel of the Capitol building on Jan. 6, 2021.

As the couple entered the tunnel the first time around 2:46 p.m., Arthur Reheyr held both of his hands in the air as he and other rioters yelled “our house!” while assisting other rioters in attempting to push past the officers in the tunnel.

Around 2:50 p.m., the Reyhers and other rioters started coordinated pushes against the officers, the documents say. At 2:52 p.m., the Reyhers exited the tunnel as the officers progressed forward against the rioters.

Investigators say that, once outside, Arthur Reyher was part of another attempt to push police out of the tunnel. He was heard on video yelling to another rioter, “Don’t hit ’em. Keep your hands up and push.”

According to court documents, at 3:01 p.m., 11 minutes after the Rehyers were first spotted on camera, they are again spotted attempting to re-enter the tunnel. This time, they and other rioters exit the tunnel after being sprayed with a chemical irritant.

At 3:04 p.m., the Rehyers returned to the tunnel and pushed the way to the front of the rioters. The Reyhers and rioters once again pushed their body weight in unison against the officers. Rioters used police riot shields and police riot batons to combat the officer.

A chemical irritant was sprayed inside the tunnel at 3:05 p.m., and the Reyhers covered their faces and exited the tunnel for a second time but stayed near the tunnel’s archway.

At 3:08 p.m., video footage captured Arthur Reyher yelling, “push!’ and patting rioters on the back as they entered the tunnel.

A rioter came out of the tunnel and yelled, “we are almost through!” while Arthur Reyher exclaimed “push!” and “our house!” Another rioter turned to the Reyhers and said, “hey, guys, are you going in or not?”

Rioters passed riot shields to the front of the tunnel and yelled “shield wall!” to make a shield wall and assault officers.

One officer in the scrim screamed in pain as the weight of the rioters’ pushes pinned him between a shield and a door.

At 3:17 p.m., the Reyhers exited the tunnel and again helped rioters push against the officer line. The pushing continued until officers successfully pushed the rioters from the tunnel.

Rehyers were released without bond and told to report to the U.S. Probation Office.

In January 2021, the FBI received anonymous tips from witnesses that the Reyhers were involved in the breach. Law enforcement interviewed Arthur Reyher, who confessed that he and Jessica Reyher were at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Rehyer says he believed President Donald Trump lost the election due to voter fraud.

Witnesses positively identified the Rehyers from images taken during the Jan. 6 breach.

In the 26 months since the Jan. 6 breach, more than 999 people have been arrested in nearly all 50 states for crimes related to the breach, with 320 of those people charged with assaulting or impeding law enforcement.

October 3, 2024: The Republic reported: “Two Bartholomew County residents plead guilty in Jan. 6 case” It was written by Andy East.

Two Bartholomew County men have pleaded guilty to assaulting enforcement officers during the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol, bringing the total number of local residents who have pleaded guilty to participating in the failed insurrection to three.

James Link Behymer of Hope and Donald Lee Moss of Elizabethtown pleaded guilty to one count of assaulting, resisting or impeding an officer during the U.S. Capitol attack, according to filings in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C.

The offense carries a maximum sentence of eight years in prison, a $250,000 fine and up to three years of supervised release, according to court records.

U.S. District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan — who also is presiding over the criminal case against former President Donald Trump over his alleged efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election — scheduled a sentencing hearing for Feb. 13.

Behymer and Moss were realized on personal recognizance following a change-of-plea hearing on Thursday.

The guilty pleas come about two months after the two local residents signed plea agreements with federal prosecutors in which they agreed to plead guilty to one of several criminal charges. Behymer had originally been charged with six criminal offenses, while Moss had been charged with seven criminal offenses.

In the agreement, Behymer and Moss acknowledged being part of a group of “angry and violent” pro-Trump rioters who surrounded and assaulted DC police as part of an effort to halt the certification of President Joe Biden’s victory in the 2020 election.

They also agreed to allow law enforcement officials to review their social media accounts and posts in an around Jan. 6, 2021, and interview them regarding the events in and around the U.S. Capitol attack prior to sentencing.

Based on the two men not having any prior felony convictions and that “the parties agree that (they) used violence or credible threats of violence in connection with the offense.” federal prosecutors calculated their sentencing guidelines to be 24 to 30 months in prison and a $10,000 to 95,000 fine, according to court records.

Federal prosecutors allege that Behymer and Moss were part of a group of “angry and violent rioters” who descended upon and assaulted D.C. Metropolitan police officers near the lower west terrace of the U.S. Capitol who were attempting to keep them from breaching the building on Jan. 6, 2021.

Federal authorities said in the complaint they were able to identify the two Bartholomew Count men through cellphone records — including a cellphone number with an 812 area code that connected to a cell site that provided service inside the U.S. Capitol during the insurrection — as well as a witness described as a “longtime associate of Moss and Behymer” who identified the two defendants after being shown still images.

Federal prosecutors also included images the claim are of the two men that were taken from officers’ body cameras and third-party footage.

The complaint alleges that Moss and Behymer shoved officer’s arms away from them as the group of rioters “surged toward the surrounded MPD officers and began violently assaulting the officers.” The complain further alleges that Behymer struck an officer in the wrist and later attempted to pry a baton out of an an officer’s hand while stating, “Now I’m being soft, but I do want this pole.”

Moss, who at one point shouted, “This is our (expletive) house” while pointing at the Capitol, allegedly struck an officer’s arm and baton and forcefully pushed another police officer from behind during the attack, the complaint states.

The two Bartholomew County men made their way through the crowd and entered the U.S. Capitol and entered the Crypt, a vaulted space located underneath the Capitol Rotunda. They later exited through the Capitol Rotunda. They later exited the Capitol but reentered after rioters broke through a barricade set up by Capitol police at the Senate Wing doors.

After reentering, they returned to the Crypt and moved a sign that had been placed on a statue outside the Crypt’s entrance and put it on another statue before taking pictures of it, according to the complaint. On one side, the sign included the initials of the Chinese Communist Party with a circle and red line through it, while “America First” and “Never give up, never surrender” were written on the other side.

When the two men left the area, Moss took the sign with him and was allegedly captured in video footage carrying the sign inside the Capitol, as well as outside the building.

October 4, 2024: United States Attorney’s Office posted: “Indiana Men Plead Guilty to Assaulting Law Enforcement During Jan. 6 Capitol Breach”

Two men from Indiana pleaded guilty on Oct. 3, 2024, to assaulting law enforcement during the Jan. 6, 2021, breach of the U.S. Capitol. Their actions and the actions of others disrupted a joint session of the U.S. Congress convened to ascertain and count the electoral votes related to the 2020 presidential election.

Donald Lee Moss, 62, of Elizabethtown, Indiana, and James Link Behymer, 61, of Hope, Indiana, each pleaded guilty to one count of assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers before U.S. District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan. The two men will be sentenced on Feb. 13, 2025.

According to court documents, at about 2:00 p.m., on Jan. 6, 2021, in Washington D.C., a group of Metropolitan Police (MPD) officers, wearing riot gear, walked toward the Lower West Terrace of the U.S. Capitol building as angry and violent rioters descended on, and surrounded, the officers and began shouting obscenities and curses at them.

The surrounded officers repeatedly issued commands to “move back.” They also began to move rioters away from their positions with their hands and batons. At approximately 2:01 p.m., Behymer approached the MPD officers with his friend, Donald Lee Moss. An MPD officer then extended his hand toward Behymer and said, “Sir, step back for your own safety.” Other officers directed Behymer and Moss to move back, but they did not. Behymer raised his right arm with a closed fist and repeatedly shouted: “USA! USA! USA!” At the same time, Moss points toward the U.S. Capitol building and shouted, “This is our f— house!”

At 2:01 p.m., an MPD officer extended their hand, attempting to keep Behymer back. Behymer then swung his fist down, striking the officer’s wrist. A few seconds later, the MPD officer placed their right hand on Behymer to keep him back; however, Behymer swung his left fist downward and struck the officer’s arm a second time while Moss forcibly shoved the officer’s hand off Behymer.

Behymer continued to shout, “USA! USA! USA!” and Moss told the officer to “Get your f— hand off him!” as the mob constricted the officers movements and pushed into them. Some members of the mob threw objects, including a traffic cone, at the officers. Admist the chaos, rioters screamed: “F — You! F–Nazis!,” “Go back to the Gestapo training camp!” “You’re the traitors! and “You wanna take us all on?!” Shortly after striking the officer’s arm, Moss leaned in and forcefully pushed another MPD officer from behind.

At approximately 2:02 p.m., Behymer was at the front of the rioters physically pressed into the officers. A rioter shouted at police: “Y’all surrounded.” Behymer then grabbed an officers hand and baton while the officer attempted to keep Behymer away. At approximately 2:03 p.m., Behymer re-engaged with police — again grabbing an officer’s baton.

Ten minutes after assaulting and opposing officers on the Lower West Terrace, at approximately 2:13 p.m., Behymer and Moss entered the U.S. Capitol building through the Senate Wing doors. At approximately 2:21 p.m., Moss stood at a shattered window and waived other rioters towards the Capitol building, encouraging them to enter the building. The two men then made their way towards the Crypt and the hallway linking toward the Senate Wing Doors. At about 2:31 p.m., Moss carried a chair across the Crypt lobby and placed it directly in the path of the retractable ceiling door to prevent the door from closing.

Moss and Behymer exited the Capitol at approximately 2:41 and 2:43 p.m., respectively. At about 2:48 p.m., rioters broke through a barricade set up by Capitol Police at the Senate Wing doors. Roughly two minutes later, Behymer and Moss re-entered the Capitol again via the Senate Wing doors and walked toward the Crypt before exiting at 3:44 p.m.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia and the Department of Justice National Security Division’ Counterterrorism Section are prosecuting this case. The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Indiana provided valuable assistance.

The FBI’s Indianapolis and Washington Field Offices are investigating this case. Moss was listed as BOLO (Be on the Lookout) #401 on the FBI’s website. Valuable assistance was provided by the U.S. Capitol Police and the Metropolitan Police Department.

In the 44 months since January 6, 2021, more than 1,504 individuals have been charged in nearly 50 states for crimes related to the breach of the U.S. Capitol, including more than 560 individuals charged with assaulting or impeding law enforcement, a felony. The investigation remains ongoing.

October 2024: Behymer and his alleged accomplice, Donald Moss, pleaded guilty to assaulting law enforcement officers during the Capitol breach.

According to an arrest complaint, the pair are accused of physically confronting police officers on the Lower West Terrace of the U.S. Capitol building as law enforcement ordered the mob to “move back.”

Behymer is seen on body camera footage grabbing an officers’s baton and pushing other law enforcement official’s hands away.

Behymer and Moss each pleaded guilty to assaulting, resisting, or impeding an officer.

They are scheduled to be sentenced in February 2025.


Trump Lawsuits 0 comments on Insurrectionists Are Facing Consequences – Part 8

Insurrectionists Are Facing Consequences – Part 8

photo of U.S. Capitol by Louis Velasquez on Unsplash

Those who attacked their own nation’s Capitol failed to consider the consequences of doing so. This is part 6.

On January 6, 2021, a mob of Donald Trump supporters staged an insurrection at the U.S. Capitol building. The Guardian reported that people stormed the chambers of the House and Senate while the Electoral College does were being tallied.


Guy Wesley Reffitt of Texas

March 8, 2022: NPR reported: “In the first Jan. 6 trial, a jury found Capitol riot defendant Guy Reffit guilty” It was written by Tom Driesbach.

A little more than a year after a group of pro-Trump rioters overwhelmed police, stormed the Capitol and temporarily halted the country’s peaceful transfer of power, a jury has unanimously returned a verdict in the first trial stemming from he events on Jan. 6, 2021:

Guilty on all counts.

The defendant, 49-year-old Guy Wesley Reffitt of Texas, was found guilty of these five criminal charges: transporting a firearm in furtherance of a civil disorder; obstruction of an official proceeding; entering or remaining in a restricted area of grounds with a firearm; obstructing officers doing a civil disorder; and obstruction of justice — hindering communication through force or threat of physical force.

It took two days to seat a jury made up of Washington, D.C., residents. Many potential jurors said they lived or worked near the Capitol building — the scene of multiple crimes in this case — or even knew Capitol Police officers who were injured that day, which complicated jury selection.

Judge Dabney Friedrich sought jurors who could keep an “open mind,” despite anything they had heard before. The jury ultimately included employees of NASA and the Department of Defense, as well as a public school maintenance supervisor.

After opening statements, four days of often emotional testimony and closing arguments in a courthouse located on a short walk away from the Capitol, that jury took under four hours to reach its verdict.

Many of the 700-plus defendants charged in connection with the Capitol riot have been closely watching the outcome of his trial as they weight how to approach their own cases. It is widely believed that this guilty verdict will give prosecutors additional leverage in plea negations with other defendants.

When the verdict was read aloud, Reffitt showed little emotion.

At one point during the proceedings, he turned to his wife, Nicole Reffitt, who was sitting in the courtroom. They locked eyes, put their hands on their chests and nodded at one another.

Nicole Reffitt spoke to reporters outside the courthouse soon after. She encouraged other Jan. 6 defendants, whom she referred to as “1/6ers,” not to plead guilty.

“Guy was used as an example to make all the 1/6ers take a plea.” she said. “Do not take a plea, 1/6ers. Do not.”

She said that her husband would appeal the ruling and that “this fight has just begun.”

Prosecutors accused Reffitt of traveling to Washington, D.C., with a fellow member of a far-right militia organization called the Texas Three Percenters.

Testimony and evidence showed that Reffit brought an AR-15 rifle and a pistol with him on the trip. He took that pistol with him to the Capitol grounds on Jan. 6, along with zip-tie-style flex cuffs, a helmet and body armor.

A demonstrators approached the building, Reffitt started ascending a stairwell in front of the Capitol guarded by a handful of police officers. Those officers testified that Reffitt told them, “You can’t stop us all. Let us in. Don’t be a traitor.” Officers shot at Reffitt with pepper balls and plastic less-lethal rounds and ultimately stopped him with pepper spray. As Reffitt sat in the stairwell, trying to wash the spray from his eyes, video showed him waving rioters forward.

Reffitt did not enter the building himself or make physical contact with any police officers. But Assistant U.S. Attorney Risa Berkower described Reffitt as the “tip of the mob’s spear” who gave rioters the window of opportunity to ultimately overwhelm the police line and take over the Capitol building.

When Reffitt returned home to Texas, he bragged in text messages and on recorded Zoom meetings about leading the charge on Jan. 6. His the-18-year-old son, Jackson Reffitt, had liberal political views and was troubled by what his father had done, so he began secretly recording his father.

Within days, Guy Reffitt became paranoid about being arrested. Jackson Reffitt testified at the trial that his father told him and his younger teenage sister, “If you turn me in, you’re a traitor. And traitor’s get shot.” Jackson Reffitt turned over the recordings he made of his father to the FBI. Five days alter, agents arrested Guy Reffitt.

At trial, prosecutors presented what they referred to as a “mountain of evidence.” That evidence included text messages; extensive video, including some recorded by Reffitt’s helmet-mounted camera on Jan. 6; a recorded Zoom meeting between Reffitt and members of his militia; and the audio recordings made by Jackson Reffitt.

Prosecutors backed up that evidence with testimony from Capitol Police officers who tried to stop Reffitt’s approach on the building; Rocky Hardie, a former member of the Texas Three Perceners who accompanied Reffitt on the trip to Washington and who was granted immunity for his testimony; and the defendant’s son, Jackson Reffitt.

The testimony of son against father made for the most dramatic and emotional day of testimony. Jackson Reffitt described the guilt and discomfort he felt about informing on his dad and how he felt “terrified” when his father told him that “traitors get shot.” Jackson Reffitt had been largely estranged from his family seen turning his father in to the FBI. At the beginning of his son’s testimony, Guy Reffitt began sobbing in the courtroom.

Inspector Monique Moore of the Capitol Police also became emotional when describing the panicked calls for help on the radio from police battling the rioters.

Reffitt’s criminal defense attorney, William Welch, called no witnesses, and his cross-examination of the government’s witnesses were generally brief. His open statement lasted just three minutes.

Welch described the government’s prosecution as a “rush to judgement” based on hyperbolic claims from Reffitt that should not be taken seriously. “Guy does brag, he exaggerates and he rants,” said Welch. The defense flatly denied that Reffitt had a gun with him on Jan. 6. Prosecutors contradicted that claim with an image of Reffitt on the Capitol steps with a holster holding a shiny object, multiple recorded statements by Reffitt saying he had his handgun on him and testimony from Reffitt saying he had his handgun on him and testimony from Reffitt’s fellow militia member.

At other times, Welch said the prosecution’s video evidence could be a “deepfake” — falsified computer-generated footage — or be otherwise manipulated. Welch presented no evidence to support that claim.

He also pressed Jackson Reffitt on Guy Reffitt’s drinking and use of Xanax, suggesting that Guy Reffitt may have been under the influence when he made the statements heard on recordings. Welch raised the possibility that Jackson Reffitt turned his father in for fame and fortune and asked about the many media interviews Jackson Reffitt has given and the money he has raised on the crowdfunding site GoFundMe. Jackson Reffitt flatly denied Welch’s insinuation during his testimony.

In his brief closing argument, Welch again insisted that Guy Reffitt was unarmed and urged the jury to convict Reffitt on a single leaser charge of entering and remaining in a restricted area — a misdemeanor.

The jury appeared to reject all of Welsh’s arguments and sided with the Department of Justice.

In a statement, the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, Matthew M. Graves, said the jury “held Guy Reffitt accountable for his actions on Jan. 6, 2021, finding him guilty of five felony charges. I would like to thank the jury for upholding the rule of law and for its diligent service in this case.”

The FBI’s Washington Field Office said in a statement: “Rather than take responsibility for his actions at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, Mr. Reffitt opted to put his family through a painful trial. Today’s guilty verdict in the first jury trial of a Jan. 6 defendant should serve as a reminder for others who committed crimes at the Capitol that day that these are serious charges and the FBI and our law enforcement partners will do what it takes to hold them accountable.”

Reffitt’s sentencing hearing is set for June 8.

August 1, 2022: Office of Public Affairs U.S. Department of Justice posted: “Texas Man Sentenced to 87 Months in Prison for Actions Related to Capitol Breach.

Defendant Carried Loaded Gun Onto Capitol Grounds, Led Charge Against Law Enforcement, Later Sought to Obstruct Justice

A Texas man was sentenced today to 87 months in prison on civil disorder, obstruction of justice, and other charges for his actions before, during, and after the breach of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. His and others’ actions disrupted a joint session of the U.S. Congress convened to ascertain and count the electoral votes related to the presidential election.

Guy Wesley Reffitt, 49, of Wylie, Texas, was the first to stand among hundreds of defendants charged in connection with the Jan. 6, 2021 breach of the Capitol. He was found guilty by a jury in the District of Columbia on March 8, 2022, of five charges, including two counts of civil disorder and one count each of obstruction of an official proceeding, entering and remaining in a restricted building or grounds with a firearm, and obstruction of justice.

“Guy Reffitt came to the Capitol on Jan. 6 armed and determined to instigate violence,” said Matthew M. Graves, U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia. “In his own words, his goal was to take the Capitol “before the day is over.” He and others contributed to the many assaults on law enforcement officers that day, putting countless more people — including legislators — at risk. The jury’s verdict and today’s sentence hold him accountable for his violent, unconscionable conduct.”

“Today’s sentence reflects the seriousness of the crimes committed by Mr. Reffitt, and underscores the wanton disregard he had for one of the pillars of our democracy — the peaceful transition of power,” said Assistant Director in Charge of Steven M. D’Antuono of he FBI Washington Field Office. “The FBI and our law enforcement partners continue to be steadfast in our commitment to ensure that all individuals who committed crimes on January 6 are held to account for their actions.”

According to the government’s evidence, Reffitt was a member of the Texas Three Percenters, a military organization. He sent messages recruiting others in the group to join him in traveling to Washington D.C. on Jan. 6, 2021. Among other things, he told the group, “we will strike the match in D.C. on the 6th.” Another militia member joined Reffitt, and the two left Texas on Jan. 5 for a trip of more than 1,000 miles in Reffitt’s car. Both men brought along handguns and AR-style rifles.

On the morning of Jan. 6, both men went to a rally on the Ellipse before heading to the Capitol. They were wearing body armor and carrying handguns, flexi-cuffs, and radios for communication. Reffitt also had a megaphone as well as a helmet with a camera mounted on the top for recording purposes. His mission, according to the evidence, was to stop Congress from acting. He was especially targeting Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell. He told members of his militia group and those gathered around him at the Ellipse that he planned to physically drag Speaker Pelosi out of the Capitol Building by her ankles.

Reffitt repeatedly made statements recorded by his helmet camera while at the Ellipse on Jan. 6, including one in which he declared, “We’re taking the Capitol before the day is over.”

By approximately 1:50 p.m, Reffitt was at the front of a pack that charged the U.S. Capitol Police officers at the terrace on the west side of the Capitol building. He climbed a banister, led the mob up staircases outside the Capitol building, and kept advancing on the officers holding the police line, even as he was struck repeatedly by the officers’ less than lethal projectiles and O.C. spray.

As he kept moving, Reffitt urged others to keep moving forward, too. He eventually made it up the stairs to outside the Senate wing of the Capitol, as others breached the building, but he did not personally go inside. While narrating a video he recorded that day, he stated, “I said I wasn’t leaving till I got in there. I didn’t make it in there. But I started the fire.”

Reffitt later boasted about his actions in conversations with his traveling companion as well as in messages and a meeting with other militia members. On Jan. 9, 2021, for instance, he wrote, “We took the Capitol of the United States of America and we will do it again.”

But his mood quickly changed. On Jan. 10, 2021, after learning that the Texas Three Percenters’ leader had been questioned by Texas law enforcement agents, Reffitt sent messages to several other group members, urging them to “Start purge of all previous conversations. NOW.” Heeding his own advice, he deleted from his iPhone a Telegram message thread between himself and the militia leader in which he disclosed his plans to be armed while attacking the Capitol.

Reffitt also told his family what he had done and threatened his teenage children to prevent them from reporting him to law enforcement.

Reffitt was arrested on Jan, 16, 2021, and he has been detained ever since. In a search of his home, FBI agents located the AR-15 style rifle and Smith & Wesson .40-caliber pistol that Reffitt had brought into Washington. They also located an illegal firearm suppressor, cans of bear spray, flexi-cuffs, and other items.

Following his prison term, he will be placed on three years of supervised release. He also must pay $2,000 in restitution.

The case was prosecuted by the US. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia. Valuable assistance was provided by the Department of Justice National Security Division’s Counterterrorism Section and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern and Northern Districts of Texas.

The case was investigated by the FBI’s Washington Field Office, the Frisco Resident Agency of the FBI’s Dallas Field Office, and the Austin Resident Agency of the FBI’s San Antonio Office. Valuable assistance was provided by the U.S. Capitol Police.

In the 18 months since January 6, 2021, more than 850 individuals have been arrested in nearly all 50 states for crimes related to the breach of the U.S. Capitol, including over 260 individuals charged with assaulting or impeding law enforcement. The investigation remains ongoing.

August 1, 2022: BBC reported: Guy Reffitt: Capitol rioter turned in by son gets 87 months in prison”. It was written by Sam Cabral & Tara McKelvey.

A Texas Man who joined the US Capitol riot armed with a holster pistol and threatened his son to keep quiet about his role has been sentenced to more than seven years in prison.

Guy Reffitt, 49, was found guilty in March on five felony counts, including obstruction of an official proceeding and interfering with police in a riot.

His sentence is the longest imposed on any of the US Capitol rioters.

Nearly 900 people have been charged in the 6 January 2021 raid on Congress.

Reffitt did not actually enter the Capitol with the horde of Trump supporters who breached the complex as lawmakers met to certify Joe Biden’s win in the November 2020 presidential election.

He retreated after an officer pepper sprayed him in the face, but video evidence showed Reffitt egging on the crowd and leading other rioters up a set of stairs outside the building.

Multiple videos Reffitt took on and after 6 January, in which he discussed planning and bragged about participating in the riot, were used in evidence against him.

Issuing a prison sentence of 87 months on Monday, US District Judge Dabney Friedrich said Reffitt’s actions and statements were “frightening claims that border on delusional.”

An oil-field worker and recruits for the far-right Three Percenters militia, Refit is said to have driven from Texas to Washington, D.C., and led fellow Three Percenters up the main staircase to the Capitol building.

According to court papers, he had told fellow members of the militia that he had planned to drag US House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi out of the Capitol building by her ankles, “with her head hitting every step on the way down.”

Reffitt was reported to the FBI by his son, Jackson, 18 at the time, who told investigators his father had threatened him.

“He said ‘if you turn me in, you’re a traitor,” the younger Reffitt said at his father’s trial earlier this year. “And traitors get shot.”

The sentence Judge Friedrich handed down was slightly below what is recommended by federal guidelines. She also declined to apply a domestic terrorism enhancement — the first requested in a US Capitol riot case.

The Texan wore an orange prison jumpsuit at the Washington DC courthouse and listened carefully as the judge credited supportive statements from Reffitt’s family for the lower sentence.

Analysts say Reffit’s sentence shows that government prosecutors may have a harder time than expected in securing the length of custodial terms they believe US Capitol rioters deserve.

Prosecutor had sought a 15-year prison term, arguing Reffitt was “in a class all by himself” among Capitol riot defendants, and other rioters were “looking to him as their leader.”

But defense lawyers had argued the attack would have happened with or without him and noted he had no criminal history.

Having declined to testify at trial, Reffitt apologized in a brief statement before his sentencing, saying he had “an issue with just rambling an saying stupid [expletive]”.

His family, including his wife, sat in the court’s third row, and his daughter Peyton spoke on his behalf.

“He says a lot of things he doesn’t mean. His mental health is an issue,” she said, visibly emotional.

She added: “My father’s name wasn’t on the flags everyone was carrying that day.

“It was another man’s name,” she added in an apparent reference to former US President Donald Trump.

His wife, Nicole Reffitt told reporters the trial show that “corrupt, evil politicians her in this city” are trying to undermine US civil liberties.

“This isn’t just about Guy Wesley Reffitt. This isn’t about just January 6th. This is about our liberties being stomped on,” she argued.

December 6, 2024: The Associated Press posted: “The first rioter tried on Jan. 6 charges gets reduced prison sentence after Supreme Court decision” It was written by Michael Kunzelman.

A Texas man who was the first rioter to go on trial for the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol was resentenced on Friday to nearly seven years in prison after he delivered an angry, profane rant to the judge who agreed to modestly reduce his original sentence.

Guy Reffitt benefited from a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that led to the dismissal of his conviction on an obstruction charge. His new sentence — six years and eight months — is seven months lower than his original sentence.

Reffit repeatedly shook his head and appeared to be agitated as he listened to U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich and a prosecutor describe his role in the mob’s attack on the Capitol. He told the judge that he was “in my feelings” and upset about the “lies and craziness” that he perceived.

“I was not here to take over no government,” Reffitt said. “I love this country.”

“No one has a problem with your feelings,” the judge said. “It’s the actions you took with your feelings.”

Reffitt stormed the Capitol with a holstered handgun on his waste. He also was carrying zip-tie handcuffs and wearing body armor and a helmet equipped with a video camera when he advanced on police officers outside the building. He retreated after an officer pepper sprayed him in the face, but he waved on other rioters who ultimately breached the building.

Prosecutors said Reffitt told fellow members of the Texas Three Percenters militia group that he planed to drag House Speaker Nancy Pelosi out of the Capitol building by her ankles, “with her head hitting every step in the way down.”

“His objective was to overtake Congress, physically and with violence,” said Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Nestler.

“In his own words,” Nestler added, “Congress was the demon and he was going to cut the head off the demon.”

Reffitt is one of several Jan. 6 defendants to be resentenced after a Supreme Court ruling in June limited the government’s use of a federal obstruction law. The high court ruled 6-3 that a charge of obstructing an official proceeding must include proof that a defendant tried to tamer with or destroy documents — a distinction that applies to few Jan. 6 criminal cases.

A jury convicted Reffitt of four other counts, including a charge that he threatened his two teenage children after returning to their home on Wylie, Texas, after the riot. Reffitt’s son Jackson, then 19, testified that his father told him and his younger sister, then 16, that they would be traitors if they reported him to authorities and warned them that “traitors get shot.”

Reffitt’s two daughters spoke favorably of their father during his resentencing. They descried him as a caring father who doesn’t pose a danger to anybody.

Prosecutors said Reffitt’s recent communications from jail indicate that he “views his imprisonment as an injustice and as part of a greater cause, and that he maintains pride in his actions on January 6 and his involvement in the community of those who he believes have been wrongly prosecuted for their crimes on that day.”

More than 1,500 people have been charged with Capitol riot-related crimes. About 1,000 of them have pleaded guilty. Roughly 250 others have been convicted by a judge or jury after a trial.


The ‘Cowboys for Trump’ Guy

March 18, 2024: NBC News reported: “Supreme Court turns away ‘Cowboys for Trump’ co-founder ousted from office over Jan. 6” It was written by Lawrence Hurley.

The legal argument that worked for President Donald Trump failed to deliver for one of his supporters Monday as the Supreme Court turned away a New Mexico man who was kicked out of local office over his role in the events of Jan. 6.

Couy Griffin, a founder of Cowboys for Trump, was criminally convicted over his role in the Jan. 6 riot and lost his job as a county commissioner as a result.

The lawsuit brought against him by New Mexico residents cited the same constitutional provision that Trump successfully argued in a separate case and could not be used to throw him off the ballot in Colorado.

Both cases concerned Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which says that those who previously took an oath to the Constitution while holding a government position but later “engaged in insurrection” cannot hold office.

Griffin had been hoping that a victory for Trump could help him, as well.

But when the Supreme Court ruled for Trump in that case March 4, it made it clear that the ruling applied only to those running for federal office.

“We conclude that states may disqualify persons holding or attempting to hold state office. But states have no power under the Constitution to enforce Section 3 with respect to federal offices, especially the presidency,” the court said.

As a result, Griffin’s case was effectively resolved. The court rejected his appeal Monday without comment.

“Very disappointed. I don’t even know what to say,” Griffin said on X. “But I thank you for your prayers and for standing with me through this.”

The lawsuit seeking to throw Griffin out of office was brought by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, the group that filed the Trump ballot lawsuit.

The Supreme Court’s actions in the two cases make it clear that “it is up to the states to fulfill their duty to Section 3 to remove from office anyone who broke their oath by participating in the Jan. 6 insurrection,” Noah Bookbinder, the group’s president, said in a statement Monday.

A state judge removed Griffin from his position as a commissioner in Otero County, New Mexico, in September 2022 after concluding that his actions on Jan. 6, 2021, made him ineligible to serve.

Earlier that year, Griffin was convicted of illegally entering the Capitol grounds, although he was acquitted of engaging in disorderly conduct during chaotic scenes in which Trump supporters attempted to prevent Congress from certifying Joe Biden’s election win.

Section 3, enacted after the Civil War, prevents anyone who previously took an oath to defend the Constitution from holding various government offices. It was passed to prevent former Confederates from returning to government but has rarely been enforced.

March 22, 2022: NPR reported: ‘Cowboys for Trump’ leader is given a mixed verdict in his Jan. 6, Captol riot trial” It was written by Allison Molenkamp.

A federal judge found a New Mexico elected official and founder of “Cowboys for Trump” guilty on one count and not guilty on another in the second trial relating to the Jan. 6, 2021, U.S. Capitol insurrection.

Couy Griffin, a county commissioner in Otero County, N.M., was charged with two counts: entering a restricted area and engaging in disorderly conduct. Griffin was found guilty of entering the restricted area and acquitted of the disorderly conduct charge.

Prosecutors alleged Griffin climbed over an outer wall and then went up a temporary staircase to an outside deck at the Capitol. Judge Trevor McFadden, presiding over what was the firs bench trial related to the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, said evidence showed Griffin crossing three walls and that Griffin would have seen fencing in the area.

“All of this would suggest to a normal person that perhaps you should not be entering the area,” said McFadden, who was appointed to the U.S. District Court of the District of Columbia in 2017 by then-President Donald Trump.

Unlike many charged in the insurrection, Griffin, who waived his right to a trial by jury, was not accused of entering the Capitol building itself or of assaulting any law enforcement officers.

In addressing the disorderly conduct charge, McFadden pointed to a montage of other video footage from Jan. 6, including conduct he seemed to see as more disruptive than Griffin’s.

“The defendant is never seen engaging in the kind of property destruction or physical violence seen in the government’s montage,” McFadden said.

The mixed verdict represents a partial victory for the government, which succeeded in establishing that the Capitol grounds were an area protected by the Secret Service on the day of the riot.

Since Griffin’s actions and statements on Jan. 6 were well-documented, the government’s case against him hinged mostly on legal definitions: what were the bounds of the restricted area, what authority set it, and did Griffin’s conduct reach the bar of “disorderly.”

The prosecution, led by Senior Assistant U.S. Attorney Janani lyengar, argued that Struck’s videos showed Griffin knew what he was doing wrong.

“We don’t have to rely on inferences, we have the defendant’s own statements that he knew this area was restricted, and he entered anyway,” Iyengar said in a closing statement, referring to comments Griffin made after the riot about the area around the Capitol being roped off on Jan. 6.

The government also argued the any reasonable person would have understood the Capitol grounds and inauguration state were off limits to the public.

Iyengar also pointed to testimony from a Secret Service witness saying the continued presence of unauthorized individuals within the restricted area forced then-Vice President Mike Pence to remain evacuated throughout the riot.

The trial marked the first time the government has acknowledged Pence, and his family’s location during the Capitol riot: an underground loading dock near the Capitol Visitor Center. The government has sought repeatedly to shield this information from the public, due to security concerns.

Judge McFadden, however said that Griffin had the right to probe this evidence in open court. Pence’s location was the key to proving Griffin violated the law regarding restricted areas.

The Justice Department has charged many defendants under the same statute as Griffin, which depends on an area being restricted due to the presence of a Secret Service protectee.

If Judge McFadden had ruled that the restricted area no longer included the Capitol because Pence went underground, that ruling could have caused ripple effects in the hundreds of other Jan. 6 cases.

Defense attorney Nicholas Smith argued the area around the Capitol was restricted by the U.S. Capitol Police, not by the Secret Service, and therefore not governed by the particular statute Griffin was charged under.

Smith also argued that Griffen did not know he’d entered a restricted are at all, pointing to a lack of “Do Not Enter” signs in the specific area of the boundary Griffin crossed.

The prosecution argued that the restricted area of the Capitol grounds was well-marked, including with bike racks and signs from the U.S. Capitol police.

Inspector John Erickson of the Capitol Police also testified that law enforcement used flashing and chemical irritants to clear the lower west terrace of the Capitol during the riot, suggesting the area was clearly off limits.

On the charge of disorderly conduct, the prosecution pointed to Griffin’s loud speeches, including one in which he said, “we’re not going anywhere, we aren’t taking no for an answer. We’re not gonna get our election stolen from us from China. This is an American that’s had enough right here.”

The defense tried to turn the disorderly conduct charge into a first amendment free speech question. Smith pointed to the steps and lawn of the Capitol as a public forum, where Griffin has a “constitutional right” to make speeches as seen in the videos.

As long as Griffin did not incite violence, Smith argued, Griffin’s speech was protected. Smith pointed to witness testimony from Struck saying when Griffin led a prayer the crowd was calmed, some even kneeling.

McFadden repeatedly drew a distinction between the lawn of the Capitol and the inaugural stage itself on the question of the Capitol grounds as a public forum. He also noted that while some members in the crowd knelt in response to the prayer, others chanted “Pray for Trump.”

Griffin did not testify in the trial, but sat at the defense table. He arrived the first day in a black cowboy hat and black western-style jacket.

Griffin has drawn media attention before. Shortly after Jan. 6, he said in a Facebook video that “we could have a Second Amendment rally on those same steps that we had that rally yesterday. You know, and if we do, then It’s gonna be a sad day because there’s gonna be blood running out of that building.”

After the trial, Griffin told reporters, “I wear January 6 as a badge of honor.”

Griffen is scheduled to be sentenced in June of this year.

He is only the second person to go to trial in connection with the Jan. 6 attack. The first trial resulted in a unanimous guilty verdict on all five felony charges, after the jury deliberated for just two hours.

According to an NPR database tracking the charges related to Jan. 6, nearly 800 people have been charged with crimes stemming from the Capitol riot, and more than 230 have pleaded guilty to one or more charges.

June 17, 2022: CBS News reported: “New Mexico county commissioner and Cowboys for Trump founder Couy Griffin sentenced for Jan. 6 conviction” It was written by Robert Legare and Scott MacFarlane.

The founder of the “Cowboys for Trump” organization and commissioner of Otero County, New Mexico, Couy Griffin, was sentenced Friday to 14 days in jail, a $3,000 fine, 60 hours of community service and a year of supervised release on Friday after being convicted of entering restricted U.S. Capitol grounds on Jan. 6, 2021.

Griffin, who has been in jail for 20 days, will revive credit for time served and will not have to serve additional time.

Griffin was found guilty in March of the misdemeanor, which carries a maximum sentence of one year in prison. A federal judge acquitted him of another misdemeanor charge of disorderly conduct in a bench trial during which the judge, not a jury, renders the verdict.

Judge Trevor McFadden ruled the Griffin was guilty of the charge the arose from his illegal entry of U.S. Capitol grounds in the vicinity of then-Vice President Mike Pence, who was in the Capitol building for the counting of the Electoral College votes and remained in the Capitol complex during the riot.

Prosecutors had said Griffin should get 90 days in prison with credit for the 20 days he has already served, contending that despite statements to the contrary, Griffin has shown a lack of remorse for his actions. Referring the split ruling one conviction and one acquittal rendered by McFadden, prosecutors noted the Griffin tweeted in the weeks after his trial and criticized the judge.

“The 1 I lost will appeal. We SHOULD have won a grand slam on both counts,” Griffin tweeted. “McFaddens PRE written response was pathetic! I wonder who wrote it??”

During the sentencing, McFadden said that Griffin not entering the Capitol “puts the case on a lower misdemeanor level,” but said there is a “grave tension” between his comments in the courtroom and his tweets.”

“Sometimes you are your own worst enemy here,” said McFadden.

McFadden also said he should uphold his oath to the Constitution, noting his responsibility as an elected official. “You are encouraging the breaking of our laws. I have to take that seriously,” McFadden said.

Griffin maintains his mistaken belief that the 2020 election was fraudulent, but McFadden said he was not being sentenced for his voting fraud beliefs.

Griffin’s sentencing in Washington, D.C., took place on the same day as New Mexico’s deadline to certify its election results, and currently, Otero County is refusing to certify, citing unspecified concerns about Dominion voting machines used in the June 7 primary.

The commissioners have not identified any problems with the voting machines, but allies of former President Trump made disproven conspiracy-laden accusations against the reliability of the machines after the 2020 election.

The Democratic secretary of state and the state Supreme Court have ordered Otero County’s commission to certify its results, and there is an emergency meeting of the commission on Friday evening, although it is not clear whether Griffin, who told CNN he would vote against certifying, will be back in New Mexico for the meeting.

Griffin, who arrived in court wearing his signature cowboy hat, took the stand saying, “I am sorry for the violence that day” and that he “disagreed” with it.

“My actions on January 6 was a result of my faith,” said Griffin, who has earlier said he went to pray over the crowd. “I live a life devoted to the Lord.”

Griffin said after the sentencing he believes he is honoring his oath of office by advocating for the hand counting of votes counted by Dominion machines.

“It could be a baseless claim, but you can’t prove anything is baseless until you look deeper into it,” he said Friday afternoon.

Griffin was not accused of any act of physical violence or entering the Capitol building on Jan. 6, 2021, but of being present on restricted Capitol grounds cordoned of by law enforcement and closed to the public ahead of the election certification. He asked the judge to sentence him to no more than two months’ probation, which his lawyer argued was the averse term for such an offense.

“To the extent his presence there contributed to the distress of outnumbered law enforcement officer, he offers them his sincere apology,” the defense wrote in a rehearing filing, later adding, “No evidence, in any case, indicated that Griffin’s purpose in being in the area was driven by [Pence’s] presence specifically” at the Capitol.

“Though he is of limited means, Griffin would seize an opportunity to offer assistance to injured officers and to contribute to the repair of physical damage to the Capitol. Griffin vows to never again enter a restricted area, at the Capitol or anywhere else,” the filing said.

Prosecutors, however, argued Griffin was part of the mob that “succeeded in halting the Congressional certification,” accord to a recent court filing.

“Griffin remained on the Capitol grounds for over two hours while rioters engaged in acts of violence and property damage on the Capitol grounds,” the memo read.

Prosecutors also allege he has used his legal fight as a way to raise monty, asking for contributions to an online funding page.

Jail time, the government argued, was the only way to deter Griffin from acting in such a way again, a claim is legal team countered, saying, “the same Griffin has experienced is itself a guarantee of deterrence.”

He was arrested in the weeks following the attack and held in pretrial detention before his legal team successfully one his court-ordered release. Griffin claimed he was innocent and argued he was unaware that Pence was still anywhere in the Capitol area. He did not testify in his own defense.

June 17, 2022: Reuters reported: “Cowboys for Trump founder sentenced to 14 days for breaching Capitol grounds” It was written by Sarah N. Lynch.

A Republican member of a governing commission in New Mexico who founded a group called “Cowboys for Trump” was sentenced on Friday to 14 days in jail over his role in breaching the U.S. Capitol grounds during the Jan. 6, 2021 riot.

But the man, Couy Griffin, will get credit for the 20 days he already served in pretrial detention, and will not be required to report to prison, the judge said. He was also ordered to pay a $3,000 fine and serve 60 days of community service.

Griffin is one of three members of the Republican-led Otero County commission that is refusing to certify June’s primary election results, citing unfounded conspiracy theories about voting machines.

Griffin was convicted in a bench trial in March of a misdemeanor count of entering and remaining on restricted grounds on Jan. 6, 2021.

Unlike many of the more than 840 defendants in the Capitol riot cases, Griffin did not physically enter the building itself.

He was acquitted of a second misdemeanor of disorderly conduct.

At his sentencing hearing in Washington on Friday, Griffin told U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden that his Christian faith prompted him to enter the Capitol grounds that day, and he swore he “could be struck dead right now,” when he said he truly did not know he was on restricted grounds.

“My actions on Jan. 6 were the result of my faith,” he said. “I received that message to go pray with people.”

Prosecutors in the case had sought a sentence of 90 days in jail, with credit for 20 days served.

They cited Twitter posts Griffin wrote, including one in which he blasted McFadden’s ruling to convict him in the case, calling it “prewritten” and “pathetic” “I wonder who wrote it?” the tweet asked.

“All of that goes to show he does not have any remorse whatsoever,” prosecutor Janani Iyengar said.

Although McFadden did not impose additional jail time, he nevertheless had harsh words for Griffin and called the Capitol riots “a national embarrassment.”

He told Griffin it was “preposterous” to claim he did not know he was violating the law, and blasted his inflammatory Twitter posts, which he said contradicted Griffin’s claims of contrition.

“Sometimes, sir, you are probably your own worst enemy.”

He also chastised Griffin, saying that as an elected official he swore to uphold the law. “I urge you to consider the oath you’ve taken,” he said.

Griffin’s sentencing comes just two days after the New Mexico Supreme Court ordered Otero County’s Republican-led commission to certify June’s primary election results.

The commission is also facing a criminal referral by Democratic-led secretary of state’s office to the state attorney general. The referrals asks the state to open an investigation into “multiple unlawful actions… that directly implicate criminal violations of the Election Code and the Government Conduct Act.”

During his sentencing hearing, Griffin continued to insist there was fraud in the election telling McFadden an audit had uncovered “major discrepancies.” He described himself as a “victim” of political backlash who had been labeled as “crazy and right-wing and white supremacist.”

Later, in comments outside the courthouse to reporters, he said he would decline to comply with the state court’s order to change his vote and certify the June 7 primary results.

“All we want to do is hand-count the ballots that are right. now resting inside the Dominion machine,” he said.

September 6, 2022: CNN reported: “New Mexico county commissioner and Cowboys for Trump founder removed from elected office for role in US Capitol riot”. It was written by Hannah Rabinowitz, Holmes Lybrand, and Scott Brownstein.

A New Mexico judge on Tuesday removed January 6 rioter and Cowboys for Trump founder Couy Griffin from his elected position as a county commissioner for his role in the US Capitol attack.

The ruling was the result of a lawsuit seeking Griffin’s remove, which alleged that he violated a clause in 14th Amendment of the Constitution by participating in an “insurrection” against the US government. He had been convicted of trespassing earlier this year.

The historic ruling represents the first time an elected official has been removed from office for their participation or support of the US. Capitol riot. It also marks the first time a judge has formally ruled that the events of January 6, 2021, were an “insurrection.”

The disqualification comes after unsuccessful challenges by liberal-leaning groups against prominent Trump supporters in the US House of Representatives and Trump-backed candidates of state offices across the country.

Griffin, one of three commissioners in Otero County, is also barred from holding any state or federal elected position in the future, state Judge Francis Mathew ruled Tuesday.

“The irony of Mr. Griffin’s argument that this court should refrain from applying the law this Court should refrain from applying the law and consider the will of he people in District Two of Otero County who retained him as a county commissioner against a recall effort as he attempts to defend his participation in an insurrection by a mob whose goal, by his own admission, was to set aside the result of a free, fair and lawful election by a majority of the people of the entire country (the will of the people) has not escaped this Court,” Mathew wrote.

Griffin, an ardent conspiracy theorist who refused to verify the state’s primary election results this summer in Otero County, told CNN he has been ordered to clean out his office and attacked the judge for being “tyrannical.”

“I’m shocked. Just shocked,” Griffin said. “I really did not feel like the state was going to move on me in such a way. I don’t know where I go from here.”

In his ruling Tuesday, Mathew wrote that Griffin’s attempts “to sanitize his actions are without merit” and “amounted to nothing more than attempting to put lipstick on a pig.”

Griffin and his organization Cowboys for Trump spent “months normalizing the violence that may be necessary to keep President Trump in office,” and urging supporters to travel to Washington, DC, on January 6, Mathew wrote, including multiple inflammatory public speech in which he likened the Stop the Steal movement to a “war” to keep Trump in office.

In June, a DC federal judge sentenced Griffin to 14 days behind bars with time served and one year of supervised release after he was found guilty of trespassing on Capitol grounds during the riot.

February 13, 2024: NBC News reported: ‘Cowboys for Trump’ founder is hoping a Supreme Court ruling on ballot eligibility could help him, too” It was written by Lawrence Hurley.

Couy Griffin is a fervent supporter of Donald Trump, but he has an addition reason for hoping the Supreme Court rule that the former president can stay on eh ballot in Colorado — the decision could benefit him as well.

Griffin, a founder of “Cowboys for Trump,” was criminally convicted for his participation in the events of Jan. 6 that led to an attack on the U.S. Capitol and was later kicked out of office as a county commissioner in New Mexico as a result.

He has his own appeal pending at the Supreme Court that raises questions similar to Trump’s appeal argued last week.

Griffin was removed from his elected position based on the same theory that Colorado officials cite to prevent Trump from appearing on the ballot: a section of the 14th amendment that says those who “engaged in insurrection” cannot hold office.

Based on oral arguments last week, it appears likely the Supreme Court will rule for Trump in his case. The Supreme Court’s reasoning could then apply in Griffin’s case.

Griffin said in an interview he listened to some of the argument and was heartened by the justices’ questions.

“President Trump is at the very top and I am at the very bottom, but a lot of the things they are trying to go after Trump on they have already been after me on,” he said. “I have been kind of a testing ground for the legal stuff.”

The justices are scheduled to discuss Griffin’s case in private for the first time at their regular private conference on Friday.

A state judge removed Griffin from his position as a commissioner in Otero County, New Mexico, in September 2022 after concluding that his actions on Jan. 6 made him ineligible to serve.

Earlier that year, Griffin was convicted of illegally entering the Capitol grounds, although he was acquitted of engaging in disorderly conduct during chaotic scenes in which Trump supporter attempted to prevent Congress from certifying President Joe Biden’s election win.

Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, enacted in the wake of the Civil War, prevents anyone who previously took an oath to defend the Constitution from holding various government offices. It was passed to prevent former Confederates from returning to government but has rarely been enforced.

In Trump’s case, questions asked by the justices indicated the court could rule that only Congress could enforce Section 3 against a presidential candidate.

Donald Sherman, a lawyer at Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a left-leaning watchdog group that represents plaintiffs in both the Trump and Griffin cases, said Griffin would lose out even if the Supreme Court rules in Trump’s favor.

That is in part because of technical legal issues about how Griffin’s case was litigated, but also because the Trump ruling could just focus on federal offices and not state ones, he said.

In the Trump oral argument, justices “raised questions about states enforcing Section 3 against those seeking national office, but expressed no concern about state enforcement against state officials,” Sherman wrote in an email.

Griffin’s lawyer, Peter Ticktin, said the New Mexico court ruling made no distinction between federal and state offices, meaning Griffin can’t hold any government position.

“He can’t even run for dog-catcher,” he said.

Vikram Amar, a professor at the University of California, Davis School of Law who filed a brief in the Trump case saying that Section 3 does not have to be enforced by Congress, and the ruling could distinguish between the presidency and other offices but that such a distinction would be “fabricated by the court.”

If the court rejects the argument that Section 3 is self-executing, “I suppose you can make up whatever you want,” he added, which means Griffin loses out.

Griffin, who at one point planned to ride a horse to this trial in Washington before abandoning the idea, said the entire process to remove him from office was unfair.

“It’s amazing. We live in a country where the headline is ‘democracy is under attack,” and they use a civil bench trial to remove an elected official,” he said.

Griffin, however, is no eyeing a return to elected office even if he were to win the case. He is hoping Trump wins the presidential election and appoints him to a position in the federal government.

The one potential problem with that plan: Section 3 applies to appointed positions, too.

March 19, 2024: CNN Politics reported: “Supreme Court won’t review ruling that removed New Mexico official from office over January 6, insurrection” It was written by John Fritze and Marshall Cohen.

The Supreme Court declined Monday to hear the appeal of a former New Mexico county commissioner who was removed from office because of his role in the January 6, 2021 insurrection — a case that was similar to the one the high court recently decided involved former President Donald Trump.

Cowboys for Trump founder and convicted Capitol rioter Couy Griffin was removed from office in 2022, marking the first time an elected official was booted from office under the 14th Amendment’s “insurrectionist ban” because of the US Capitol riot.

The Supreme Court’s move means the ruling barring Griffin from office will stand.

In a unanimous decision on March 4, the high court sided with Trump in a similar case. Six Colorado voters attempted to knock the former president off the ballot in that state because his remarks before the attack on the US Capitol in 2021. But the court ruled that states couldn’t do so on their own.

Responsibility for enforcing the ban, the court wrote, “rests with Congress and not the states.” But the ruling explicitly said states are allowed to enforce the so-called insurrectionist ban against “persons holding or attempting to hold state office.”

That’s the process that was followed with Griffin, who was removed by his local county office by a New Mexico state judge.

And further, Griffin, unlike Trump, had already been found guilty of a January 6-related crime when he was disqualified from holding office. He was convicted of trespassing on Capitol grounds after a bench trial in March 2022. He was acquitted of a second misdemeanor charge of disorderly conduct, but the conviction bolstered the challengers’ arguments that he engaged in an insurrection.

A civil trial on the disqualification question was held later that year. A state judge ruled that January 6 was an insurrection and the Griffin violated the oath he took as a commissioner by engaging in that insurrection. Griffin was disqualified under Section 3 and was removed in September 2022.

New Mexico’s top court dismissed Griffin’s appeal on procedural grounds.

A prominent right-wing conspiracy theorist, Griffin was part of the Capitol insurrection mob, though he didn’t enter the building itself.

He returned to national attention in June 2022 by refusing to certify the legitimate results of a primary elections in his county, citing baseless claims of election irregularities, which triggered a standoff with state election officials.

In a recent interview with CNN, Griffin slammed the process the led to his disqualification, and also criticized the similar cases against Trump.

“This whole thing starts on a small scale, with them coming after me, with the specific goal of bringing it up to the big stage with Donald Trump,” Griffin said. “I was the test case.

October 22, 2024: Law & Crime reported: ‘Breaching the restricted area suffices,”: Court shuts down ‘Cowboys for Trump’ founder’s Jan. 6 conviction appeal, rejects argument he didn’t know Pence was there”. It was written by Colin Kalmbacher.

A federal court of appeals on Tuesday denied a prominent Jan. 6 defendant’s effort to overturn his misdemeanor trespass conviction.

In March 2022, Couy Griffin, the founder of “Cowboys for Trump” and a former New Mexico county commissioner, was convicted on one count of entering a restricted area on the Capitol grounds and acquitted on one count of disorderly and disruptive conduct in a restricted building. The bench trial was overseen by Donald Trump’s appointed U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden.

On the day of the riot, Griffin made his way into a restricted area that had been cordoned off and closed to the public in order to protect then-Vice President Mike Pence as he waited to oversee vote tallies.

In determining the defendant’s guilt, the lower court judge said Griffin “certainly knew he shouldn’t be there” and “yet, he remained.”

On appeal, the defendant argued his actions did not satisfy the part of the statute that criminalizes trespassing in non-public places.

Griffin said his actions should be reasonably viewed as innocent because the Capitol grounds are typically open to the public, and earlier rioters had dispensed with various law enforcement barriers and signage indicating the area had been restricted.

That argument did not go over well with the majority.

“Under his reading, a defendant would be entitled to acquittal so long as he waited until a sufficiently strong gust of wind, a soaking downpour — or even a less scrupulous prior intruder — disposed of law enforcement tape, fencing, or signage before he entered a sensitive area in full awareness he was not lawfully authorized to do so,” the opinion reads. “We decline to read the statute to allow a mob to de-restrict an officially restricted area encompassing persons under Secret Service protection.”

The court explains its reasoning at length:

U.S. Capitol grounds qualified on January 6 as a “restricted building or grounds” and were “posted, cordoned off, or otherwise restricted” when Griffin entered and remained there. In anticipation of then-Vice President Pence’s presence at the Capitol to certify the electoral votes on January 6, law enforcement officers had erected barriers around the perimeter of the closed area with layers of snow fencing and bike racks supplementing pre-existing permanent walls to encircle the Capitol grounds.

Signs indicating the area was closed were affixed along the barriers. By the time Griffin entered the restricted area, many of those physical manifestations of its closure had been largely trampled, but that fact did not alter the status of the area as closed to the public.

The defendant also argued that lacked the requisite mental state required to commit the crime because he did not know he was trespassing. A related defense argument on the mental state issue was that the court failed to require the government to prove Griffin knew why trespassing in that particular instance would be a crime.

In what might pass for a rehash of the discussion about what Griffin actually did, the court goes through a lengthy recitation about what the government actually proved during the bench trial.

Again, the majority at length:

The government proved that Griffin saw the rings of fencing and signage encircling the Capitol grounds on January 5, and when he recorded a video with the grounds as his backdrop. And it showed that he recorded a video with the grounds as his backdrop.

And it showed that, the next day, when Griffin scaled the stone wall that partially delineated the grounds, he landed on trampled snow fencing and signs, which the district court observed would suggest to a reasonable person “that perhaps you should not be entering the area.”

The evidence that Griffin knew he was trespassing only mounted as he continued to progress across the grounds. Arriving at the base of the inaugural stage, he announced, “we’re in now,” and joked that he should hide his identity with a face mask. When Griffin quipped that he loved the “smell of napalm in the air,” he showed he knew that law enforcement officers were using teargas as they battled to expel a mob — a clear sign that the area remained restricted.

As for the argument that prosecutors never proved he knew why the ground were restricted, the court concluded: “The government was not requires to prove that Griffen was aware that the Vice President’s presence was the reason the ground remained restricted.”

Public policy reasons undergird the appellate court’s interpretation of the relevant statute at issue in the case.

“We hold that knowingly breaching the restricted area suffices, even without knowing the basis of the restriction — here, the presence of Vice President Pence at the Capitol on January 6,” the opinion by Circuit Judge Nina Pillard reads. “Congress intended to criminalize trespasses endangering Secret Service protectees regardless of the trespasser’s awareness of the basis for Congress’s authority to regulate them. And a contrary interpretation would impair the Secret Service’s ability to protect its charges.”

In a ruling against Griffin, however, the court did not just reject the defense’s argument. They also rejected a mens era – mental state– requirement alltogether.

The majority said applying such a requirement “would pointlessly hinder the Secret Service’s ability to defend national leaders from would-be assassins and encumber the prosecution of persons whose knowing trespasses endanger persons under Secret Service protection.”

In dissent, Circuit Judge Gregory Katsas said the rationale advanced by the majority was actually an argument in favor of retaining a highly specific mental state requirement.

October 22, 2024: CNN Politics reported: “January 6 riot condition of ‘Cowboys for Trump” founder is upheld in precedent-setting case” It as written by Katelyn Polantz.

The federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday upheld the conviction of the Cowboys for Trump fonder who entered the restricted area of the US Capitol on January 6, 2021, saying rioters didn’t have to know the Secret Service was protecting then-Vice President Mike Pence inside when they breached the area.

The case is among a handful that tested the foundational approach the Justice Department took to prosecute hundreds of Capitol rioters, and the decision has been long-awaited since it was argued last December by those handling cases coming through the DC federal court.

It also strengthens federal protection the Secret Service can offer, by defining more clearly the law around trespassing in areas where public officials are being protected.

“The basis of the Secret Service’s authority to prevent access to designated areas for the safety of its protectees … need not be in the mind of the trespasser,” DC Circuit Judge Nina Pillard wrote in the opinion Tuesday.

The unsuccessful challenge to the law was brought by Couy Griffin, a New Mexico local official who organized a group called Cowboys for Trump, who jumped a stone wall outside the Capitol to board the inauguration stage. Griffin was convicted of two misdemeanors, including the trespassing change, and was sentenced to 14 days in jail and a year of supervised release.

“In [Griffin’s] view, the statute also requires proof that he knew why the Capitol grounds were so restricted when he entered or remained there — i.e. that a Secret Service protectee was or would be temporarily visiting the Capitol grounds. We decline to adopt such a rule,” Pillard wrote in a 2-1 opinion. “Griffin’s approach would surely hinder the Secret Service’s capacity to handle the full range of potential threats.”

It’s possible Griffin continues to fight his trespass charge with further appeals, including potentially to the US Supreme Court, which has shown interest in reinterpreting the law around the Capitol riot.

Griffin previously asked the Supreme Court to hear a different legal challenge he brought related to January 6, following his removal from an elected public office. A judge jettisoned Griffin from his role as a New Mexico county commissioner, and the high court declined to hear his case seeking reinstatement.

An attorney for Griffin from the federal public defender service didn’t immediately respond to CNN’s request for comment.

Trump appointee dissents

The three-judge panel had one dissenter, Judge Greg Katsas, a Trump appointee. Judge Judith Rogers, a Clinton appointee, sided with Pillard, an Obama appointee, in the majority opinion.

In his dissent Katsas said he believed prosecutors should have had to prove Griffin knew the seriousness of the protected area where he was trespassing and that Pence could be there, in addition to proving that he knew he was crossing into a prohibited area.

“Needless to say, a trespass that threatens the life or safety of the President or Vice President is substantially more culpable than a simple trespass consisting of nothing more than knowingly entering an area ‘posted, cordoned off, or otherwise restricted,” Katas wrote.

“Trespassers unaware that someone like the President or Vice President is present are much less likely to pose a threat to those officials than are individual who knowingly trespass into an area restricted to protect them,” the judge added.

Katas noted among the 470 trespassing convictions of January 6 rioters that prosecutors have secured, trial court judges in DC split on how much those rioters had to know of Pence’s presence at the Capitol.

September 6, 2022: NBC News reported: “Cowboys for Trump co-founder barred from public office over Jan. 6” It was written by Summer Concepcion.

A New Mexico judge ordered the co-founder of Cowboys for Trump removed from public office Tuesday over his presence at the U.S. Capitol during the Jan. 6 riot.

State District Judge Francis Mathew removed Otereo County Commissioner Cuoy Griffin from his elected position “effective immediately” and banned him from seeking further public office, citing the 14th Amendment’s clause barring those who have take oaths to uphold the Constitution from holding federal or state office if they have engaged “in insurrection or rebellion.”

“Due to his disqualification under Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment, defendant is constitutionally ineligible and barred for life from serving as a ‘Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President’, or from “hold[ing] any office, civil or military, under the United States, or any State,’ including his current office as an Otero County Commissioner,” Matthew wrote.

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington and several New Mexico-based law firms represented a group of state residents in the lawsuit to remove Griffin as county commissioner.

Griffin, who has espoused false claims of mass voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election, was convicted in federal court this year of a misdemeanor for entering the Capitol grounds on Jan. 6, 2021, without going inside. Griffin was sentenced to 14 days and given credit for time served.

Griffin was the second defendant to go to trial in connection with the Capitol attack after his arrest in January 2021, weeks after supporters of then-President Donald Trump stormed the Capitol to protest the results of the 2020 election amid Trump’s refusal to concede.

Griffin, who faced misdemeanor charges, represented himself in a two-day bench trial. He made headlines at the start of the trial this year for ditching his plans to ride a horse to the courthouse. Griffin claimed that he abandoned the plan because h wanted to respect the court and didn’t want to create a “spectacle.” He instead showed up with a truck with “COWBOYS FOR TRUMP” -branded horse trailer attached.

Upon walking into the courthouse in March, Griffin insisted that the metal police barricade he climbed upon on the grounds of the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, was actually a step.

“That was a step,” Griffin claimed. “It was a meta step. I used it as a step … You can call it a barricade. I call it a step.”

October 22, 2024: KSBY Action News 8 reported: “Jan. 6 riot conviction of “Cowboys for Trump” founder upheld in president-setting case.” It was written by Katelyn Polantz.

The federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday upheld the conviction of the Cowboys for Trump founder who entered the restricted area of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, saying rioters didn’t have to know the Secret Service was protecting then-Vice President Mike Pence inside when they breached the area.

The case is among a handful that tested the foundational approach the Justice Department took to prosecute hundreds of Capitol rioters, and the decision has been long-awaited since it was argued last December by those handling cases coming through the D.C. federal court.

It also strengthens federal protection the Secret Service can offer, by defining more clearly the law around trespassing in areas where public officials are being protected.

“The basis of the Secret Service’s authority to prevent access to designated areas for the safety of its protectees … need not be in the mind of a trespasser,” DC Circuit Judge Nina Pillard wrote in the opinion Tuesday.

The unsuccessful challenge to the law was brought by Couy Griffin, a New Mexico local official who organized a group called Cowboys for Trump, who jumped a stone wall outside the Capitol to board the inauguration state. Griffin was convicted of two misdemeanors, including the trespassing charge, and was sentenced to 14 days in jail and a year of supervised release.

“In [Griffin’s] view, the statute also requires proof that he knew why the Capitol grounds were so restricted when he entered or remained there — i.e., that a Secret Service protect was or would be temporarily visiting the Capitol grounds. We decline to adopt such a rule,” Pillard wrote in the 2-1 opinion. “Griffin’s approach would surely hinder the Secret Service’s capacity to handle the full range of potential threats.”

It’s possible Griffin will continue to fight his trespass charge with further appeals, including potentially to the U.S. Supreme Court, which has shown interest in reinterpreting the law around the Capitol riot.

Griffin previously asked the Supreme Court to hear a different legal challenge he brought to Jan. 6, following his removal from an elected public office. A judge jettisoned Griffin from his role as a New Mexico county commissioner, and the high court declined to hear his case seeking reinstatement.

An attorney for Griffin from the federal public defender’s service didn’t immediately respond to CNN’s request for comment.

Trump appointee dissents

The three-judge panel had one deserter, Judge Greg Katsas, a Trump appointee. Judge Judith Rogers, a Clinton appointee, sided with Pillard, an Obama appointee, in the majority opinion.

In his dissent, Katsas said he believed prosecutors should have to prove Griffin knew the seriousness of the protected area where he was trespassing and that Pence could be there, in addition to proving that he knew he was crossing a prohibited area.

“Needless to say, a trespass threatened the life or safety of the President or Vice President is substantially more culpable than a simple trespass considering of nothing more than knowing entering an area ‘posted, cordoned off, or otherwise restricted,” Katsas wrote.

“Trespassers unaware that someone like the President or Vice President is present are much less likely to post a threat to those officials than are individual who knowingly trespass into an area restricted to protect them,” the judge added.

Katsas noted that among the 470 trespassing conviction of January 6 rioters that prosecutors have secured, trial court judges in D.C. split on how much those rioters had to know of Pence’s presence at the Capitol.


Trump Lawsuits 0 comments on Insurrectionists Are Facing Consequences – Part 7

Insurrectionists Are Facing Consequences – Part 7

photo of U.S. Capitol by Caleb Fisher on Unsplash

Those who attacked their own nation’s Capitol failed to consider the consequences of doing so. This is part 6.

On January 6, 2021, a mob of Donald Trump supporters staged an insurrection at the U.S. Capitol building. The Guardian reported that people stormed the chambers of the House and Senate while the Electoral College does were being tallied.


California man testified against Capitol riot companion sentenced to home detention

May 3, 2024: The Associated Press reported: “California man who testified against Capitol riot companion is sentenced to home detention” It was written by Michael Kunzleman.

A California man who organized a “group of fighters” to storm the U.S. Capitol — and later, testified against one of his companions during the Jan. 6, 2021 attack — was sentenced on Friday to six months of home detention.

Russell Taylor had a knife on his chest and was carrying a hatchet in his backpack when he helped the rioters overrun a police line outside the Capitol.

Taylor, 42, of Ladera Ranch, California, pleaded guilty last year to conspiring to obstruct the Jan. 6 joint session of Congress for certifying President Joe Biden’s 2020 electoral victory. He was a key witness for prosecutors in the trial of Alan Hostetter, a former police chief who was also convicted of a conspiracy charge.

Prosecutors recommended a prison term of four years and four months for Taylor, but U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth spared him from incarceration and sentenced him to three years of probation. He also ordered him to preform 100 hours of community service.

Lamberth, who has been one of the toughest punishers of the Jan. 6 riot defendants, said a probation sentence “comes once in a lifetime in my courtroom” and warned Taylor that he will be imprisoned if he violates his probation terms.

“You can be the poster child now for how these cases should be done,” the judge said.

“There’s hope at the end of the tunnel,” the judge said.

Taylor fought back tears as he recalled spending time jailed in solitary confinement after his arrest.

“I thought about why I was there and the mistake I made on January 6th,” he said. “I thought about being charged with a crime by a country that I do love.”

Prosecutors cited Taylor’s cooperation as grounds for leniency but argued that his role in the Jan. 6 attack merited a prison sentence.

“Taylor understood that his decision would not only sever his relationship with former associate but expose him to potential harassment and threats as well,” prosecutor wrote in a court filing.

Taylor and Hostetter served together on the board of the American Phoenix Project. Hostetter founded the group to protest government restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic, but its focus later shifted to conspiracy theories about election fraud.

“After then-President (Donald) Trump lost the 2020 election, Taylor and Hostetter discussed how to respond, and Taylor asked, ‘How do we have a show of force? Motorcade? Rally? Riot?” prosecutors wrote.

Before the riot, Taylor organized a Telegram group that he called: “The California Patriots — DC Brigade” for those “that are traveling to DC for Jan 6th event that are comfortable with violence.” Taylor told members they would use the Telegram channel “to organize a group of fighters.

Taylor flew to Washington while Hostetter drove across the country with weapons that Taylor would carry when he stormed the Capitol.

A day before Trump’s “Stop the Steal” rally near the White House on Jan. 6, Taylor and Hostetter gave speeches with violent rhetoric at a rally outside the U.S. Supreme Court.

“I will see you all tomorrow at the front lines. We are taking our country back!” Hostetter told the crowd.

After attending the rally, Hostetter and Taylor marched to the Capitol and approached a police line on the Lower West Terrace. Taylor cheered on the rioters who broke through the police line, shouting, “Move forward, Americans!”

Taylor then pushed against a police line on a stage set up for Biden’s inauguration. An officer deployed pepper spray in Taylor’s face, briefly causing him to retreat.

Hostetter and Taylor didn’t enter the Capitol but remained on the Upper West Terrace for hours before police cleared the area. Taylor later celebrated on Telegram, posting “I was pushing through traitors all day today. WE STORMED THE CAPITAL!” Freedom was fully demonstrated today!

Taylor was charged with Hostetter and four other defendants — Erik Scott Warner, Felipe Antonio Martinez, Derek Kinnison and Ronald Mele — who authorities have linked to the anti-government Three Percenters militia movement.

Lamberth sentenced Hostetter to over 11 years in prison after convicting him on all four counts, including conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding and entering a restricted area with deadly or dangerous weapon. After a jury separately convicted the four other defendants, Lamberth sentenced them to terms of imprisonment ranging from 21 to 33 months.

Taylor said he thought he was “answering the call of a president that I believed in.”

“I was wrong to follow and listen to many people like Alan, who had their own agendas,” he told the judge.

Defense attorney Dyke Huish said Taylor already has performed 300 hours of community service and took citizenship classes “to remind him of the true value of being an American.”

Taylor’s cooperation with the government created an “unusual conundrum,” his lawyer said.

“This who still support the events of January 6th see him in hostile terms for his admissions and cooperation. He has been treated harshly by some people and had veiled personal threats. At the same time those on the other side of the issue shun him because he went to Washington D.C. in the first place,” Huish wrote.

More than 1,350 people have been charged with federal crimes related to the Capitol riot. Over 850 of them have been sentenced, with roughly two-thirds receiving a term of imprisonment ranging from a few days to 22 years.

December 11, 2024: CBS News reported: “Man who pleaded guilty to Jan. 6 charge asks court if he can go to Trump’s inauguration” It was written by Scott MacFarlane.

A California man who pleaded guilty last year to conspiring to obstruct the Jan. 6, 2021, joint session of Congress to certify President Biden’s 2020 victory has asked the court for permission to travel to Washington, D.C., to attend President-elect Donald Trump’s inauguration on Jan. 20.

Russell Taylor, who was part of a group affiliated with the far-right, anti-government Three Percenters that was accused of plotting and planning to disrupt the electoral count, asked U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth if he can travel with his wife and children to Washington D.C., and Maryland for the inauguration.

Taylor’s lawyer, Dyke Huish, said in a court filing that Taylor was invited to attend the ceremony by retired Rep. Chris Stewart, of Utah. Huish stated that Taylor had completed his home confinement and was in compliance with his probation. He wrote that Taylor “does not pose any risk or concern for this travel request.”

Taylor admitted he had helped organize an effort on Telegram to travel to Washington on Jan. 6, to be “ready and willing to fight.”

A day before Jan. 6, 2021, he addressed a crowd saying, “I will see all tomorrow at the front lines. We are taking our country back!”

On Jan. 6, Taylor wore an armored tactical vest and brought a stun baton with him to the Capitol and was among the initial groups of rioters trying to break through police lines. He recorded a video in which he was seen urging rioters to fight and push forward against police. Later that day, he posted on Telegram, “I was pushing through traitors all day today. WE STORMED THE CAPITOL! Freedom was fully demonstrated today!”

Taylor, who had no prior convictions, flipped and cooperated with the Justice Department, testifying against a lead organizer, Alan Hostetter, a former police chief who was convicted of a conspiracy charge.

Prosecutors recommended a prison term of almost 4.5 years for Taylor, but Lamberth instead sentenced him to three years of probation and 100 hours of community service. Lambert said he believed Taylor had testified truthfully and expressed sincere remorse, and he said Taylor’s cooperation had been “essential,” which earned him the chance to avoid prison time.

Taylor told the judge, “I thought about why I was there and the mistake I made on January 6th. I thought about being charged with a crime by a country that I do love.”

December 11, 2024: “January 6 defendant invite to Trump’s inauguration by former GOP lawmaker” It was written by Ryan J. Reilly and Megan Lebowitz.

A Republican former House member and three current members of Congress from Utah invited a Jan. 6 defendant to President-elect Donald Trump’s inauguration, according to a letter filed by the defendant’s lawyer.

Jan. 6 defendant Russell Taylor organized a group of “fighters” to travel to Washington D.C., on Jan. 6, 2021, in response to Trump’s tweet telling supporters the day “will be wild.” Last year, Taylor pleaded guilty to a count of obstruction of an official proceeding and cooperated with the government against members of the Three Percenters militia group. Taylor, prosecutors wrote, went to the Capitol led a mob that overran a police line while he was “wearing an exposed knife on top of a bullet proof chest plate and carrying bear spray, a hatchet, and other weapons in his backpack.”

Taylor’s lawyer, Dyke E. Huish, filed a motion Wednesday asking U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth to allow Russel to travel to Washington with his wife and children for the inauguration.

The filing, which was first reported by Politico, included a letter from former Rep. Chris Stewart, of Utah, who wrote that “three other current members of the Utah congressional delegation join with me in extending this invitation.”

Huish told NBC News that Taylor had friends in common but didn’t meet Stewart himself until after Taylor was sentenced to probation along with six months of home detention.

“Mr. Taylor has some family friends who knew the congressman,” Huish said. “It’s a really boring story: They’re just friends, and he said “Hey, would you like to come to the inauguration?” and he set off a letter, and I’ve got to ask the judge permission, and here we are.”

Huish said he did not know which three of the four members of the Utah delegation had joined Stewart in inviting Taylor to the inauguration.

Stewart, a strong defender of Trump in Congress, resigned last year, citing his wife’s illness.

Stewart wrote in his letter that Taylor is a “caring father and reveres his family, his faith,” and “is admired by many, and especially those in his community.” He wrote that “Russ’ passion for what is right and good is reflected in his intentions to lift others. I am honored to extend this invitation for him to attend the Inauguration as my guest.”

Steward did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Huish said in his filing that Taylor “has successfully completed his home confinement and is in compliance with his terms and conditions of probation.”

Taylor organized a group of “Patriots that are ready to function as operators of disruption and against Tyranny” ahead of the attack, writing, “I personally want to be on the front steps and be one of the first to breach the doors!” The weapons and tactical gear found on him included “hatchets, a taser, stun batons, bear spray, tactical gloves, a helmet, and a plate carrier vest with bullet proof plates,” according to a memorandum for his sentencing.

On Jan. 6, 2021, after the Capitol attack, Taylor wrote in a message that he “was pushing through traitors all day today.”

“WE STORMED THE CAPITOL! Freedom was fully demonstrated today,” he continued.

Taylor’s filing requesting permission to travel comes just days after Lamberth emphasized the judicial principles of “truth and justice, law and order” at a separate Jan. 6 sentencing. Lamberth had also said jurors who heard Jan. 6-related cases “know how perilously we came to letting the peaceful transfer of power, that great cornerstone of the American republican experiment and perhaps our foremost contribution to posterity, slip away from us.”

Taylor testified on behalf of the government in trials that ultimately led to prison sentences for his co-conspirators. Huish said Lamberth had described his client as “the poster child” for the proper way for Jan. 6 defendants to handle their cases.

“He’s never backed off his belief that there were improprieties in the 2020 election. He’s always supported President-elect Trump But at the same time, he said, “Look, I personally went too far,” Huish said. “Quite honestly, if more people had been like Mr. Taylor, I think there’d be a lot less people in jail and we’d have restored this stuff a lot faster. You don’t have to give up your integrity to say, “I went too far.”

Trump has previously lavished praise on Jan. 6 rioters, a refrain he frequently invoked on the campaign trail. He has described people facing prison time for their roles in the Jan. 6 attack as “hostages” and “patriots.”

He has said he would “most likely” pardon Jan. 6 rioters, saying in a “Meet the Press” interview, that aired Sunday that “those people have suffered long and hard.”

In the interview, Trump said members of Congress who served on the House Jan. 6 committee ‘should go to jail.”

More than 1,570 people have been charged for crimes related to the Jan. 6 attack, according to data released this week by the U.S. attorney’s office for Washington. Of that number, about 590 people were charged related to assaulting or resisting law enforcement or obstructing the officers’ jobs, according to the office. Overall, prosecutors have secured convictions against more than 1,100 defendants, and Judge has sentenced more than 600 rioters to incarceration.

July 13, 2023: The Associated Press reported: “Former police chief who defended himself at trial is convicted of conspiracy in Jan. 6 riot” It was written by Michael Kunzelman.

A former California police chief was convicted on Thursday of joining the riot at the U.S. Capitol with a hatchet in his backpack and plotting to stop Congress from certifying President Joe Biden’s 2020 electoral victory.

A judge in Washington’s federal court heard testimony without a jury before convicting Alan Hostetter, a right-wing activist and vocal critic of COVID-19 restrictions who defended himself at his bench trial with help from a standby attorney.

Hostetter used his closing arguments to spin conspiracy theories about the Jan. 6, 2021, riot. He falsely claimed the 2020 election was stolen from former President Donald Trump, portrayed himself as a victim of FBI corruption and referred to the mob’s attack as a “federal setup” involving “crisis actors wearing costumes.” He downplayed violence at the Capitol, referring to the riot as “basically the equivalent of a three-hour hissy fit.”

U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth told Hostetter that no reasonable person — let alone a veteran police officer — would believe that it was legal to use mob violence to obstruct Congress.

“Belief that your actions are for a greater good does not negate consciousness of wrongdoing,” Lamberth said.

Hostetter — who previously served as police chief in La Habra, California, near Los Angels, — was convicted on all four counts, including conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding and entering a restricted area with deadly or dangerous weapon. The judge scheduled sentencing for Oct 13, and denied a Justice Department request to have Hostetter jailed immediately.

Federal prosecutors said Hostetter has no evidence to support his conspiracy theories but stressed that he was charged with crimes for his actions on Jan. 6 — not his political beliefs. One prosecutor, Jason Manning, said Hostetter advocated for violence and mobilize allies to join him in Washington on Jan. 6 because he “didn’t like the election results.”

“For many Americans, the horror of January 6th came out of nowhere. Not for the defendant,” Manning said.

Hostetter was arrested in June 2021 along with five other men. Their indictment linked four of Hostetter’s co-defendants to the Three Percenters wing of the militia movement. Their name refers to the myth that only 3% of Americans fought against the British in the Revolutionary War.

Hostetter said he doesn’t have any connection to the Three Percenters movement and accused prosecutors of falsely portraying him as “a caricature of some radical terrorist.”

One of Hostetter’s co-defendants, Russell Taylor, pleaded guilty in April to a conspiracy charge. Taylor testified for the government at Hostetter’s trial. A trial for the other four is scheduled for October.

The six men — Hostetter, Taylor, Eric Scott Warner, Felipe Antonia Martinez, Derek Kinnison, and Ronald Mele — were part of a chat group called “The California Patriots – DC Brigade” on Telegram, an encrypted messaging platform, prosecutors said. Taylor posted that he created the group for “fighters” who were expected to bring “weaponry” and “plates” with them to Washington on Jan. 6, according to prosecutors.

All six defendants entered restricted areas of the Capitol grounds during the riot, prosecutors said. Hostetter wasn’t accused of entering the Capitol building.

On Instagram Hostetter posted a photo of himself and Taylor on the building’s Upper West Terrace with rioters in the background. A message under the photo said, “This was the ‘shot heard ’round the world!” … the 2021 version of 1776. That war lasted 8 years. We are just getting warmed up.”

Hostetter began teaching yoga after more than 20 years in law enforcement. In the spring of 2020, he founded a nonprofit called the American Phoenix Project. He used the tax-exempt organization to oppose COVID-19 restrictions and to advocate for violence against political opponents after the 2020 presidential election.

In November 2020, Hostetter drove to California to Washington to attend the “Million MAGA March” supporting Trump. On the way, he posted a video of his nonprofit’s YouTube channel in which he expressed his belief that the election had been stolen from Trump and called for killing “tyrants and traitors.”

In December 2020, Hostetter’s nonprofit hosted a “Stop the Steal” rally in Huntington Beach, California.

“The enemies and traitors of American both foreign and domestic must be held accountable. And they will,” he said at the rally. “There must be long prison terms, while execution is the just punishment for the ringleaders of this group.”

A day before the riot, Taylor gave a speech at a “Virginia for Trump” rally outside the U.S. Supreme Court in which he called for violence to overturn the 2020 presidential election results, prosecutors said.

“We are all free Americans and in these streets, we will fight and we will bleed before we allow our freedom to be taken from us,” Taylor said, according to the indictment.

More than 1,000 people have been charged with federal crimes related to the Capitol riot. Approximately 100 of hem have been convicted after trial decided by judges or juries. More than 600 others have pleaded guilty.


Ex-police chief who spread Jan. 6 conspiracy theories sentenced to 11 years

December 7, 2023: NBC News posted: “Ex-police chief who spread Jan. 6 conspiracy theories is sentenced to 11 years in Capitol riot case.” It was written by Ryan J. Reilly.

A former California police chief who called for the execution of Donald Trump’s political enemies, joined the U.S. Capitol attack and then spread conspiracy theories about Jan 6 was sentenced to more than 11 years in federal prison on Thursday.

Alan Hostetter was found guilty in July on charges of conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, obstruction of an official proceeding, entering or remaining on restricted grounds with a deadly or dangerous weapon and disorderly or disruptive conduct on restricted grounds with a deadly or dangerous weapon. He represented himself at a bench trial before U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth, a Ronald Regan appointed, who sentenced him to 135 months Thursday.

Hostetter, who was the chief of the La Habra, California, Police Department in 2010, was arrested in June 2021.

Like GOP presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy and many far-right members of Congress, Hostetter has spread conspiracy theories about the attack on Jan. 6, 2021. Ramaswamy said, without evidence, during the Republican debate Wednesday night that Jan. 6 “now does look like it was an inside job,” Hostetter said during his trial that he believed “that the entire thing was staged.”

Hostetter, who was found to have carried a hatchet during the attack, brought up Ramaswamy’s debate comments at his sentencing hearing Thursday.

“These conspiracy theories are no longer fringe,” he said, noting Ramaswamy’s comments specifically.

“The open election was stolen. You have presidential candidates saying that openly during the debate,” Hostetter said. “At some point, the truth is going to be coming out.”

Hostetter also noted House Speaker Mike Johnson’s decision to release Jan. 6 video, which has sparked additional unsupported conspiracy theories.

Hostetter also founded a group called the American Phoenix Project, which protested covid restrictions and denied the 2020 election results. He recorded a video after Donald Trump lost the election in which he said that “traitors need to be executed” and promoted Jan. 6 as the final day when patriots could make their stand.”

“Choke that city off, fill it with patriots, and then those people behind the walls of the Senate and House are gonna be listening to just chanting outside those walls.” Hostetter said in a speech ahead of the attack that was cited by prosecutors. “And they’re gonna realize, we have one choice. We either fix this mess and keep America America, or we become traitors, and those five million people outside the walls are gonna drag us out by our hair and tie us to a f—ing lamppost. That’s their option.”

“Some people, at the highest level, need to be made an example of: an execution or two or three,” Hostetter said in a video he recorded in November 2020. “Tyrants and traitors need to be excused as an example so nobody pulls this s— again.”

Federal prosecutors had sought more than 12.5 years in federal prison, sayin Hostetter conspired, collected weapons and traveled to Washington with the plan of using the threat of violence to stop the peaceful transfer of power.

At a hearing Thursday, Assistant U.S. Attorney Anthony Mariano said that Hostetter had made himself a “poster child for Jan. 6 conspiracy theories” and that he spent time “promoting the dangerous lie that Jan. 6 was a false flag operation.”

But as Mariano pointed out, Hostetter had “not a piece of evidence” to support the conspiracy theory.

“If the defendant wants to know what would have stopped Jan. 6, he could start by looking in the mirror,” Mariano said, describing Hostetter’s actions as terroristic, not patriotic.

Hostetter said at the hearing that he believed Jan. 6 was a setup by the CIA, the FBI, and the Department of Homeland Security. He said that he believed crisis actors and federal informants were involved, that the attack was a “false flag event” and that the death of Trump supporter Ashli Babbitt was faked.

“Once Ashli Babbitt psy-ops falls, this whole thing becomes undone,” Hostetter said, adding he believed there were “hundreds, if not possibly thousands,” of government informants in the crowd that day.

Hostetter also said he believes Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes — who is serving 18 years in federal prison — is a government asset.

Hostetter will be required to report to prison next year. After the hearing, Babbitt’s mother, Micki Witthoeft, confronted him in the hallway. Witthoeft, who got a meeting with former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy this year and frequently attends Jan. 6 court hearings, told Hostetter that her daughter was, in fact, dead.

“I assure you she is dead,” she said. “What the f— is it you’re trying to say?”

“Was she cremated?” Hostetter asked.

“You need help,” she replied. “Arrogant s—“

Hostetter’s trial featured testimony from co-defendant Russell Taylor, who pleaded guilty as part of a plea deal with the government. Their four co-defendants — Erik Scott Warner, Felipe Antonio Martinez, Derek Kinnison, and Ronald Mele — were all found guilty of felony obstruction of an official proceeding and other charges after trial last month.

More than 1,200 people have been charged in connection with the Capitol attack, and more than 450 have been sentenced to periods of incarceration.

December 7, 2023: NPR reported: “Former police chief turned yoga teacher sentenced to 11 years over Jan. 6 riot” It was written by Tom Dreisbach, and Barbara Van Woerkom.

A retired California police chief, who led pro-Trump protests and called for “traitors” in government to be “executed as an example,” was sentenced to 135 months — just over 11 years — in prison for his role in the Jan. 6 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol.

After representing himself at his trial earlier this year, Alan Hostetter was convicted of conspiring to obstruct Congress’ certification of Joe Biden’s electoral victory, bringing a hatchet onto Capitol grounds, and disorderly conduct. While Hostetter joined the mob on the steps of the Capitol, he stopped short of entering the building and did not assault police officers during the riot.

“This defendant’s conduct was terrorism,” said Assistant U.S. Attorney Anthony Marino, who argued that Hostetter’s lengthy career in law enforcement meant he should have known better.

“Through his words and deeds on Jan. 6, Alan Hostetter was a terrorist,” Marino said. “Nothing he did was patriotic.”

Hostetter denied wrongdoing and gave a lengthy conspiratorial rant claiming that the Capitol riot was the result of a “false flag” attack engineered by the federal government. “I have full faith and confidence the truth will come out and when it does it will shock people,” Hostetter told the court. He also praised Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy for saying at Wednesday’s GOP primary debate that the Jan. 6 riot “now does look like it was an inside job.”

At one point in his remarks to the court, Hostetter endorsed a baseless fringe theory that the fatal shooting of Ashli Babbitt, who was killed by a police officer while attempting to breach a locked door in the Capitol was “staged”.

“She wasn’t actually killed that day,” Hostetter said. That claim angered Babbitt’s mother, Micki Witthoft, who attended the hearing. Witthoeft confronted Hostetter outside the courtroom, calling him “arrogant” and telling him “you need help.”

The Department of Justice had asked Judge Royce Lamberth to sentence Hostetter to just over 12 years in prison, arguing that his violent anti-government rhetoric, carrying of dangerous weapons, and extensive planning merited a harsh punishment.

Many participants in the Jan. 6, 2021, riot took unusual paths to the storming of the Capitol, but few were as singular as Hostetter’s.

Hostetter served in the U.S. Army in the 1980s and deployed to Germany before going on to work for the Orange County Sheriff’s Department and ultimately becoming police chief of La Habra, Calif. After her retired from that position due to what he said were spinal problems, Hostetter settled in the small beachside community of San Clemente and became a yoga instructor and sound healer. He posted videos of himself playing a gong in front of a sunset, and rhapsodizing about the search for inner peace.

After the COVID-19 pandemic hit in early 2020, Hostetter began leading protests against what he viewed as tyrannical government overreach, and spoke in terms of violent anti-government revolution. He founded a nonprofit called the American Phoenix Project to support his protest efforts, and gained traction in Southern California’s right-wing political scene, standing out with his signature trilby hat and goatee. Hostetter appeared at events with Republican politicians and patented with the law firm of a prominent Republican attorney, Harmeet Dhillon, to challenge California’s COVID-19 policies in court.

Throughout his case, Hostetter has appeared to endorse a wide range of baseless conspiracy theories while arguing that he is a target of a longstanding government plot.

At time, he has referenced the pro-Trump QAnon conspiracy alongside claims about the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, the firing of Tucker Carlson from Fox News and the Freemasons.

After the 2020 election, Hostetter and his group turned their focus to rejecting Biden’s electoral victory.

“President Trump must be inaugurated on January 20th, and he must be allowed to finish this historic job of cleaning out the corruption in the cesspool known as Washington, D.C.,” Hosteter said in a speech in Huntington Beach, Calif. in Dec. 2020. “The enemies and traitors of America, both foreign and domestic, must be held accountable. And they will. There must be long prison terms, while execution is the just punishment for the ringleaders of this coup.”

Prosecutors say that Hostetter then, “spent weeks rallying others, collecting weapons and planning an attack on the U.S. Capitol on they that the peaceful transfer of power was meant to take place.”

Key evidence against Hostetter came from one of his co-defendants, a California man named Russell Taylor. He helped plan protests with Hostetter and joined Hostetter in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 6 while armed with a knife, body armor and a stun baton. Taylor pleaded guilty to a charge of conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, cooperated with prosecutors and testified against his former friend.

Hostetter continued to dispute Taylor’s testimony at his sentencing hearing. In wrapping his remarks, he thanked Judge Lamberth for allowing him to speak at length about his case. “You always have given me the opportunity to flap my gums,” Hostetter told the court.

December 7, 2023: United States Attorney’s Office District of Columbia posted: “Texas Man Sentenced To More than 11 Years in Prison for Conspiracy To Obstruct Congress and Other Charges during Jan. 6 Capitol Breach”

Defendant, a Retired Police Chief and Member of the “DC Brigade,” Conspired to Halt Electoral College Vote

A Texas man, formerly of California, was sentenced today in the District of Columbia after he was convicted on four felonies as a result of his conduct during the breach of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. His actions and the actions of others disrupted a joint session of the U.S. Congress convened to ascertain and count the electoral votes related to the 2020 presidential election.

Alan Hostetter, 59, of Poolville, Texas, formerly of San Clemente, California, was sentenced by U.S. District Judge Royce C. Lamberth to 135 months in prison and 36 months of supervised release. Judge Lamberth found Hostetter guilty of four felonies on July 13, 2023, following a bench trial.

Hostetter was convicted of conspiring to obstruct an official proceeding; obstruction of an official proceeding and aiding and abetting; entering and remaining in a restricted building or grounds with a deadly or dangerous weapon; and disorderly or disruptive conduct in the restricted building or grounds with a deadly or dangerous weapon.

According to the evidence presented at trial, in the days following the 2020 presidential election, Hostetter, a retired police chief, coordinated with his co-conspirators to obstruct and interfere with the joint session of Congress at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, convened in order to certify the electoral college vote.

Prior to the events of January 6th, Hostetter gave several speeches espousing his views on the 2020 presidential election and calling for the execution of his perceived political enemies. He pronounced to a crowd of supporters, “There must — absolutely must — be a reckoning. There must be justice. President Trump must be inaugurated on January 20th, and he must be allowed to finish his historic job of cleaning out the corruption in the cesspool known as Washington, D.C. The enemies and traitors of America, both foreign and domestic, but be held accountable. And they will. There must be long prison terms, while execution is the just punishment for the ringleaders of this coup.”

In another such speech in December 2020, Hostetter told a crowd of supporters that what he intended to accomplish on Jan. 6, 2021, when Congress was in session, stating, “Choke that city off, fill it with patriots, and then those people behind the walls of the Senate and House are going to be listening to us chanting outside those walls.” He added that he wanted member of Congress to know that “those five million people outside the walls are going to drag us out by our hair and tie us to a f— lamp post.”

On Jan. 1, 2021, a co-conspirator of Hostetter’s created a Telegram chat called “The California Patriots-DC Brigade,” which Hostetter, along with more than 30 others, joined and used to identify themselves, communicate and coordinate with each other.

Hostetter drove to Washington D.C., for the January 6th protest, choosing not to fly so that he could load his car with weapons. Hostetter brought tactical gear, a helmet, hatchets, knives, stun batons, pepper spray, and other gear for himself and others. On the morning of Jan. 6th. Hostetter met up with other members of the “DC Brigade” and walked to the Ellipse for the “Stop the Steal” rally.

Following the conclusion of the events at the Ellipse, Hostetter and others began to walk toward the Capitol building, where he made his way up the stairs of the Capitol, through scaffolding and onto the Inaugural state. As he came out from the scaffolding, Hostetter carried a bullhorn and looked down over the West Plaza, where rioters were battling with the police line they had passed earlier.

From his highly visible perch, and which his bullhorn directed to the crowd and his American flag waving above the chaotic scene, Hostetter encouraged the rioters below, who had been overrun by the police. At approximately 2:30 p.m., Hostetter joined the rioters on the Lower West Terrace of the Capitol who were pushing through a line of law enforcement officers trying to hold them back. Hostetter and a co-conspirator then pushed through the law enforcement line, moved through restricted areas of the grounds, and climbed into scaffolding covering a northwest set of stairs leading to the Inaugural stage.

Hostetter finally arrived at the Upper West Terrace. Here, he stated in a recorded video, “The people have taken back their house. I don’t think I’ve ever seen such a beautiful sight in my whole life. We’ve been sitting here, quietly for years, watching this corruption unfold. Hundreds of thousands of patriots showed up today to take back their government.” Hostetter remained on the Upper West Terrace for hours. While there, he carried his bullhorn and used it to encourage the crowd. Hostetter finally left the area after being forced out by police.

Hostetter later posted a picture of himself taken from the Upper West Terrace to an Instagram account that he controlled, writing, “This was the shot heard round the world! … 2021 version of 1776. That war lasted 8 years. We are just getting started.”

Hostetter was arrested on June 2021, in California by the FBI.

On November 7, 2023, four of Hostetter’s co-defendants — Erik Warner, Felipe Antonio “Tony” Martinez, Derek Kinnison, and Ronald Mele — were convicted by a jury of, among other offenses, conspiring to obstruct an official proceeding. Hostetter’s co-defendant, Russel Taylor, previously pleaded guilty to conspiring to obstruct an official proceeding. These defendants are awaiting sentencing.

This case was prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia and the Department of Justice National Security Division’s Counterterrorism Section. Valuable assistance was provided by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California.

This case was investigated by the FBI’s Los Angeles Field Office, as well as the Metropolitan Police Department and U.S. Capitol Police, with significant assistances provided by the FBI’s Washington Field Office.

In the 35 months since Jan. 6, 2021, more than 1,230 individuals have been charged in nearly 50 states for crimes related to the breach of the U.S. Capitol, including more than 440 individuals charged with assaulting or impeding law enforcement, a felony. The investigation remains ongoing.

December 8, 2023: CNN Politics reported: “Former police chief sentenced to 11 years for involvement in January 6, Capitol attack”

A former California police chief who brought a hatchet to the Capitol on January 6, 2021, and gave prior speeches calling for the execution of his perceived political enemies, was sentenced to 11 years in prison Thursday.

Alan Hostetter, 59, was sentenced to 135 months — a little over 11 years — Thursday by U.S. District Judge Royce C. Lamberth, for his involvement in the Capitol riot.

In July, Hostetter was found guilty of conspiring to obstruct an official proceeding, obstruction of an official proceeding, entering and remaining in a restricted building or grounds with a deadly or dangerous weapon, and disorderly or disruptive conduct in a restricted building or grounds with a deadly or dangerous weapon.

Prior to the Capitol riots, a pro-Trump rally a day before the Capitol riot spewing violent rhetoric in speeches in DC on January 5. The next day, Hostetter brought tactical gear, a helmet, hatchets, knives, stun batons, pepper spray and other gear to the Capitol, according to the Department of Justice.

Upon arrival, he met up with other members of a group known as the “DC Brigade,” before joining the “Stop the Steal” rally. He later made his way to the Capitol building, where he joined other rioters pushing through law enforcement.

Hostetter was arrested on June 10, 2021, in California by the FBI.

Four of his co-defendants were convicted in November of conspiring to obstruct an official proceeding and a fifth co-defendant, Russell Taylor, previously pleaded guilty to conspiring to obstruct an official proceeding, according to the release.


November 7, 2023: United States Attorney’s Office – District of Columbia posted: “Texas Man Sentenced to More than 11 Years in Prison for Conspiracy To Obstruct Congress and Other Charges During Jan. 6, Capitol Breach”

GOVERMENT’S SENTENCING MEMORANDUM

The United States of America, by and through its attorney, the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia, respectfully submits this sentencing memorandum in connection with the above-captioned matter. For the reasons set forth herein, the government requests that this Court sentence Kevin Danial Loftus (“Loftus”) to thirty (30) days’ incarceration, three (3) years’ probation, and sixty (60) hours of community service, and order him to pay restitution in the amount of $500, as he agreed to do in the guilty plea agreement.

I. Introduction

The defendant, Kevin Daniel Loftus (“Loftus”), participated in the January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol — a violent attack that forced an interruption of the certification of the 2020 Electoral College vote count threatened the peaceful transfer of power after the 2020 Presidential election, injured more than one hundred police officers, and resulted in more than one million dollars of property damage.

Loftus pleaded guilty to one count of 40 U.S.C. 5104(e)(2)(G): Parading, Demonstrating, or Picketing in the Capitol Building. As explained herein, a sentence of thirty (30) days’ incarceration is appropriate in this case because:

(1) Loftus came to Washington D.C., from Wisconsin on or about January 4 to attend the “Stop the Steal rally;

(2) on January 6, Loftus attended the “Stop the Steal” rally and then marched to the U.S. Capitol;

(3) after arriving at the U.S. Capitol, Loftus illegally and without permission walked inside the U.S. Capitol where he took several photos of himself and others inside the U.S. Capitol;

(4) on January 7, Loftus wrote on his Facebook account that he was wanted by the FBI, and he identified himself as one of the individuals pictured in an FBI release of suspects wanted in this investigation;

(5) also on that date, Loftus wrote on his Facebook account, “One of the 700” referencing individuals inside the U.S. Capitol. Loftus also wrote, “That is a right folks some of us are in it to win it;” and

(6) on January 9, 2021, during an interview of Loftus conducted by the FBI in Eau Claire, Wisconsin, he admitted to walking inside the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021.

Loftus also was an active-duty soldier in the United States Army for six years, and his participation in the January 6 attack on the Capitol was at odds with his prior commitment to protect and defend the United States and the Constitution.

Even if he did not personally engage in violence or property destruction during the riot, before entering the Capitol on January 6, Loftus celebrate the violence of that day. Loftus posted videos to his Facebook account of the attack on the U.S. Capitol and exclaimed that he and others were “in it to win it,” presumably referring to the efforts of many of the January 6 rioters, including himself, to disrupt the Congressional certification of the 2020 Electoral College vote.

The Court must also consider that Loftus’ conduct on January 6, like the conduct of scores of other defendants, took place in the context of a large and violent riot that relied on numbers to overwhelm police, breach the Capitol, and disrupt the proceedings. But for his actions alongside so many others the riot likely would have failed to delay the certification vote.

(“A mob isn’t a mob without the numbers. The people who were committing those violent acts did so because they had the safety of numbers.”) (statement by Judge Chutkan). Here, Loftus’ participation in a riot that actually succeeded in halting the Congressional certification of the Electoral College vote, his celebration and endorsement of the violence on that day, and his lack of remorse renders a sentence of thirty (30) days’ incarceration, three (3) years’ probation, and sixty (60) hours of community service appropriate.

II. Factual and Procedural Background

The January 6, 2021 Attack on the Capitol

To avoid exposition, the government refers to the general summary of the attack on the U.S. Capitol. (Statement of Offense), at 1-3. As this court knows, a riot cannot occur without rioters, and each rioter’s actions — from the most mundane to the most violent — contributed, directly and indirectly, to the violence and destruction of that day. With that backdrop we turn to the defendant’s conduct and behavior on January 6.

Kevin Daniel Loftus’ Role in the January 6, 2021 Attack on the Capitol

Loftus came to Washington, D.C., from Wisconsin on or about January 4 to attend the “Stop the Steal” rally. On January 6, Loftus attended the “Stop the Steal” rally and then marched to the U.S. Capitol. Subsequently, after arriving at the U.S. Capitol, Loftus illegally and without permission walked inside the U.S. Capitol. As outlined in the following series of photographs, Loftus (circled in red below) can be seen unlawfully entering the U.S. Capitol and exiting after spending approximately four minutes and 50 seconds inside.

In addition, Loftus took several photo of himself and others inside the U.S. Capitol. On or about January 7, Loftus bragged on his Facebook account that he was wanted by the FBI, and he identified himself as one of the individuals pictured in an FBI release of suspects wanted in the investigation. In addition, on or about January 7, Loftus also wrote, “The is right folks some of us are in it to win it.”

Loftus’ FBI Interview

On or about January 8, 2021, during an interview of Loftus conducted by the FBI in Eau Claire, Wisconsin, Loftus admitted, inter alia, that he climbed up on a scaffolding at the U.S. Capitol for a good view and to take pictures and he walked inside the U.S. Capitol on what he thought was the top floor of the U.S. Capitol where Loftus took several photos and he later posted items on social media. Loftus also stated that he did not touch or hurt anyone.

The Charges and Plea Agreement

On January 11, 2021, Kevin Daniel Loftus was charged by complaint with violating 18 U.S.C. 1752(a)(1) and (2) and 40 U.S.C 5104(e)(2)(A) and (G). On January 12, 2021, he was arrested at his home in Wisconsin. On February 4, 2021, Loftus was charged by four-count Information with violating 18. U.S.C. 1752(a)(1) and (2) and 40 U.S.C. 5104(e)(2)(D) and (G). On October 19, 2021, Loftus pleaded guilty to Count four of the Information, charging him with a violation of 40 U.S.C 5104(e)(2)(D), Disorderly Conduct in the Capitol Building. By plea agreement, Loftus agreed to pay $500 in restitution to the Department of the Treasury.

III. Statutory Penalties

Loftus now faces a sentencing on a single count of 40 U.S.C. 5104(e)(2)(D). As noted by the plea agreement and the U.S. Probation Office, Loftus faces up to six months of imprisonment and a fine of $5,000. Loftus must also pay restitution under the terms of his plea agreement. As this offense is a Class B Misdemeanor, the Sentencing Guidelines do not apply to it.

IV. Sentencing Factors Under 18 U.S.C. 3553(a)

In this misdemeanor case, sentencing is guided by 18 U.S.C. 3553(a), which identifies the factors a court must consider in formulating the sentence. Some of those factors include: the nature and circumstances of the offense, 3553(a)(1); the history and characteristics of the defendant, the need for the sentence to reflect the seriousness of the offense and promote respect for the law 3553(a)(2)(A); the need for the sentence to afford adequate deterrence, 3553(a)(2)(B); and the need to avoid unwarranted sentence disparities among defendants with similar records who have been found guilty of similar conduct. 3553(a)(6). In this case, as describe below, the Section 3553(a) factors weigh in favor of thirty (30) days’ incarceration, three (3) years’ probation, and sixty (60) hours of community service.

A. The Nature and Circumstances on the Offense

The attack on the U.S. Capitol, on January 6, 2021, is a criminal offense unparalleled in American history. It represented a grave threat to our democratic norms. It was the one of the only times in our history when the building was literally occupied by hostile participants. The attack defies comparison to other events.

While each defendant should be sentenced based on their individual conduct, this Court should note that each person who entered the Capitol on January 6 without authorization did so under the most extreme of circumstances. As they entered the Capitol, they would — at a minimum — have crossed through numerous barriers and barricades and heard the throes of a mob. Depending on the timing and location of their approach, they also may have observed extensive fighting with police officers and smelled chemical irritants in the air. No rioter was a mere tourist that day.

Additionally, while looking at Loftus’s individual conduct, the Court must assess such conduct on a spectrum. This Court, in determining a fair and just sentence on this spectrum, should look to a number of critical factors, to include: (1) whether, when, how the defendant entered the Capitol building; (2) whether the defendant encouraged violence; (3) whether the defendant encouraged property destruction; (4) the defendant’s reaction to acts of violence or destruction; (5) whether during or after the riot, the defendant destroyed evidence; (6) the length of the defendant’s time inside of the building, and exactly where the defendant traveled; (7) the defendant’s statements in person or on social media; (8) whether the defendant cooperated with, or ignored commands from police officers; and (9) whether the defendant demonstrated sincere remorse or contrition. While these factors are not exhaustive nor dispositive, they help to place each defendant on a spectrum as to his fair and just punishment.

To be clear, had Loftus personally engaged in violence or destruction, he would be facing additional charges and/or penalties associated with that conduct. The absences of violent or destructive acts on the part of Loftus is therefore not a mitigating factor in misdemeanor cases, nor does it meaningfully distinguish Loftus from most other misdemeanor defendants.

Loftus’s lack of violence and property destruction explains why he was charged only with, and permitted to plead guilty to, a misdemeanor rather than felony.

More broadly, Loftus’ statements on social media during and after the attack demonstrate a total lack of remorse for his criminal conduct on January 6. Loftus bragged that he was wanted by the FBI, and he identified himself as one of the individuals pictured in an FBI release of suspects wanted in the investigation. Loftus also wrote that he was “One of 700” individuals unlawfully inside the U.S. Capitol, and that, like the others, he was “in it to win it.:

Accordingly, the nature and the circumstances of this offense establish the clear need for a sentence of thirty (30) days’ incarceration, three (3) years’ probation, and sixty (60) hours of community service.

Defendants Conduct While on This Court’s Release Status

One of the most important factors in distinguishing a possible sentence of home detention and that of incarceration is Loftus’s conduct while on release in this very case. As set forth below, on or about August 13, 2021, Loftus — under the alias “Zoso” sent individuals (whose screen names and posts are redacted herein) a series of messages on a social media game application site. In those messages, Loftus boasted that he “already” possessed various firearms, and so was not worried that he would be prevented from buying any more as a condition of his sentence.

In addition, Loftus made several statements regarding this case and celebrated that he was now “famous” and a “hero” for his illegal actions on January 6, 2021. Loftus also stated that he gained that fame by “standing up for all Americans” because he “broke the law,” and that he would file lawsuits against unidentified persons after the criminal case was over.

B. Loftus’ History and Characteristics

Loftus has a disturbing 25-year history of failing to obey the law. Loftus has four convictions of DUI, one for reckless driving, and another conviction for theft, spread out over fifteen years.

Loftus served six years in the United States Army. As Judge Nichols observed, this is a double-edged sword. On one hand, Loftus is to be commended for his military service to this country, particularly sine he served two tours of duty overseas. On the other hand, his participation in a violent attack on the U.S. Capitol and his belief that his conduct on January 6 was an act of patriotism that made him a “local hero” is the antithesis of patriotism and heroism that characterizes the vast majority of this country’s military veterans.

C. The Need for the Sentence Imposed to Reflect the Seriousness of the Offense and Promote Respect for the Law

The attack on the U.S. Capitol building and grounds was an attack on the rule of law. “The violence and destruction of property at the U.S. Capitol on January 6 showed a blatant and appalling disregard for our institutions of government and the orderly administration of the democratic process.”

As with the nature of the offense, this factor supports a sentence of incarceration, as it will in most cases, including misdemeanor cases, arising out of the January 6 riot. (“As to probation, I don’t think anyone should start off in these cases with any presumption of probation. I think the presumption should be that these offenses were an attack on our democracy and that jail time is usually — should be expected”) (statement of Judge Hogan).

D. The Need for the Sentence to Afford Adequate Deterrence

Deterrence encompasses two goals; general deterrence, or the need to deter crime generally, and specific deterrence, or the need to protect the public from further crimes by this defendant. 18 U.S.C. 3553(a)(2)(B-C).

General Deterrence

The demands of general deterrence weigh in favor of incarceration, as they will for nearly every case arising out of the violent riot at the Capitol. Indeed, general deterrence may be the most compelling reason to impose a sentence of incarceration. The violence at the Capitol on January 6 was intended to interfere, and did interfere, with one of the most important democratic processes we have; the peaceful transfer of power to a newly elected President.

As noted by Judge Moss during sentencing:

[D]emocracy requires the cooperation of the governed. When a mob is preparing to attack the Capitol to prevent our elected officials from both parties from performing their constitutional and statutory duty, democracy is in trouble. The damage that [the defendant] and others caused that day goes way beyond the several-hour delay in the certification. It is a damage that will persist in this country for decades.

Indeed, the attack on the Capitol means “that it will be harder today than it was seven months ago for the United States and our diplomats to convince other nations to pursue democracy. It means that it will be harder for all of us to convince our children and our grandchildren that democracy stands as the immutable foundation of this nation.

The gravity of the offenses demands deterrence. This was not a protest. (“I don’t think that any plausible argument can be made defending what happened in the Capitol on January 6th as the exercise of First Amendment rights.”) (statement of Judge Moss). And it is important to convey to future potential rioters — especially those who intend to improperly influence the democratic process — that their actions will have consequences. There is possibility no greater factor that this Court must consider.

The Need to Avoid Unwarranted Sentencing Disparities

As the Court is aware, the government has charged over 700 individuals for their roles in this one-of-a-kind assault on the Capitol, ranging from unlawful entry misdemeanors, such as in this case, to assault police officers, to conspiracy to corruptly interfere with Congress. Each offender must be sentenced based on their individual circumstances, but with the backdrop of the January 6 riot in mind.

Moreover, each offender’s case will exist on a spectrum that ranges from meriting a probationary sentence to crime necessitating years of imprisonment. The misdemeanor defendants will generally fall on the lower end of that spectrum, but misdemeanor breaches of the Capitol on January 6, 2021, were not minor crimes. A probationary sentence should not become default.

The government and the sentencing courts have already begun to make meaningful distinctions between offenders. Those who engaged in felonious conduct are generally more dangerous, and thus, treated more severely in terms of their conduct and subsequent punishment.

Those who trespassed, but engaged in aggravating factors, merit serious consideration of institutional incarceration. Those who trespassed, but engaged in less serious aggravating favors, deserve a sentence more in line with minor incarceration or home detention.

For one thing, although all the other defendants discussed below participated in the Capitol breach on January 6, 2021, many salient differences — such as how a defendant entered the Capitol, how long he remained inside, the nature of any statements he made (on social media or otherwise), whether he destroyed evidence of his participation breach, etc. — help explain the differing recommendations and sentences.

And as that discussion illustrates, avoiding unwarranted disparities requires the courts to consider not only a defendant’s “records” and “conduct” but other relevant sentencing criteria, such as a defendant’s expression of remorse or cooperation with law enforcement…

…In any event, the goal of minimizing unwarranted sentencing disparities in 3553(a)(6) is “only one of several factors that must be weighted and balanced,” and the degree of weight is “firmly committed to the discretion of the sentencing judge.

The 3553(a) factors that this Court assesses are “open-ended,” with the result that “different district courts may have distinct sentencing philosophies and may emphasize and weight the individual 3553(a) factors differently; and every sentencing decision involves its own set of facts and circumstances regarding the offense and the offender.”

“[D]ifferent district courts can and will sentence differently — differently from the Sentencing Guidelines range, differently from the sentencing of an appellate court might have imposed, and differently from how other courts might have sentenced that defendant.”

Simply stated, the government (and this Court) should not ignore Loftus’ bombastic rhetoric, if no hubris, during the pendency of this case. As discussed supra, Loftus flaunted the severity of these crimes, and showcased his unwillingness or inability to take this process seriously. Rather, Loftus was fond of his newfound “fame”, and considered himself a “hero”, a startling take on the events of January 6. This all suggests that while this Court should and must be focused on rehabilitation, punishment is an appropriate goal at sentencing too.

V. Conclusion

Sentencing requires the Court to carefully balance the 3553(a) factors. As explained herein, some of those factor support a sentence of incarceration and some support a more lenient sentence. Balancing these factors, the government recommends that this Court sentence Kevin Daniel Loftus to thirty (30) days’ incarceration, three (3) years’ probation, and sixty (60) hours of community service. Such a sentence protects the community, promotes respect for the law, and deters future crime by imposing restrictions on his liberty as a consequence of his behavior, while recognizing his early acceptance of responsibility.

November 8, 2023: The Associated Press reported: “4 California men linked to the Three Percenters militia convicted of conspiracy in Jan. 6 case”

Four California men linked to the “Three Percenters” militia movement have been convicted charges including conspiracy and obstruction for their roles in the Jan. 6, 2021 riot at the U.S. Capitol.

Erik Scott Warner, 48, of Menifee,; Felipe Antonio Martinez, 50, of Lake Elsinore; Derek Kinnison, 42, of Lake Elsinore; and Ronald Mele, 54, of Temecula, were found guilty on Tuesday after a trial in Washington’s federal court, according to prosecutors.

They were convicted of conspiracy and obstruction of an official proceeding — the joint session of Congress in which lawmakers met to certify President Joe Biden as the winner of the 2020 election.

Attorneys for Martinez and Warner declined to comment, and emails seeking comment were sent to an attorney for Mele.

Kinison’s lawyer, Nicolai Cocis, said he is disappointed with the verdict and they are considering all available legal options.

“Mr. Kinnison is a patriotic citizen who wanted to show his support for President Trump, who he believed was the rightful winner of the 2020 election. He regrets his involvement in the events of January 6,” Cocis said in an email.

Prosecutors say the men were part of the Three Percenters militia in Southern California. The Three Percenters militia movement refers to the myth that only 3% of Americans fought in the Revolutionary War against the British.

They were charged in 2021 alongside Alan Hostetter, a former California police chief, right-wing activist and vocal critic of COVID-19 restrictions, who was convicted in July in a separate trial.

The four men joined a telegram chat with Hostetter and Taylor called “The California Patriots — DC Brigade” to coordinate plans for coming to Washington. Taylor posted that he created the group for “fighters” who were expected to bring “weaponry” and body armor with them to Washington on Jan. 6, according to prosecutors.

Warner, Martinez, Kinnison and Mele drove cross country together days before the riot. On Jan. 6, Warner entered the Capitol through a broken window. Meanwhile, Martinez, wearing a tactical vest, and Kinnison, who was wearing a gas mask, joined rioters on the Capitol’s Upper West Terrace, according to the indictment. Mele, who was also wearing a tactical vest, proclaimed “Storm the Capitol!” in a “selfie” style video on the stairs of the building, prosecutors say.

Warner and Kinnison, who were accused of deleting the “DC Brigade” chat from their phones after the riot, were also convicted of tampering with documents or proceedings.

Nearly 1,200 people have been charged with Capitol riot-related federal crimes. Over 800 of them have pleaded guilty or been convicted by a jury or judge after a trial. Approximately 700 of them have been sentenced, with roughly two-thirds receiving terms of imprisonment ranging from three days to 22 years.

December 13, 2024: The Associated Press reported: “Capitol rioter who tried to join the Russian army is sentenced to prison for probation violation.” It was written by Michael Kunzelman.

A Dallas man who tried to fly overseas to join the Russian military and fight against Ukraine was sentenced on Friday to six months in prison for violating the terms of his probation for storming the U.S. Capitol four years ago.

Kevin Loftus, a 56-year-old veteran of the U.S. Army, was stopped from boarding an Oct. 28 flight from Dallas to Tbilisi, Georgia, by way of Istanbul, Turkey, when Turkish Airlines identified a “security flag” associated with him, according to federal prosecutors.

Loftus didn’t have the court’s permission to secure a 90-day visa to travel to Russia, where he intended to apply for temporary residency. Loftus said he used the Telegram messaging platform to communicate with a man who would connect him with the Russian Territorial Defense Unit, a volunteer military corps.

“Loftus said he had already sent the man approximately $1200 to purchase equipment for Russian soldiers,” prosecutors wrote. “Loftus said his intent was to fight for Russian and against Ukraine.”

Loftus declined to address the court before U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich sentenced him for the probation violation. The judge said Loftus has repeatedly violated court orders.

“He doesn’t think these rules should apply to him,” Friedrich said. “He wants to be above the law.”

Defense attorney Benjamin Schiffelbein said Loftus wanted to enlist in the Russian military because he “felt bad” for Russian soldiers and wanted to help them.

“He had no idea whether they could make use of him,” the lawyer said.

Loftus, a six-year Army veteran, intended to permanently relocate to another country, according to prosecutors.

“And his planned travel was for the express purpose of joining a foreign army to take up arms against one of this country’s allies and in opposition to this country’s foreign policy,” they wrote.

In January 2021, Loftus traveled from Wisconsin to Washington, D.C., to attend then-President Donald Trump’s “Stop the Steal” rally near the White House. After joining the mob of Trump supporter at the Capitol, he entered the building and took photographs. He spent approximately five minutes inside the Capitol.

Loftus was arrested at his Wisconsin home several days after the riot. He pleaded guilty in October 2021 to a misdemeanor count of parading, demonstrating, or picketing in a Capitol building.

After his arrest, Loftus posted comments about his case on social media, referring to himself as “famous” and a “hero” for taking part in the Jan. 6 attack.

“Loftus also stated that he gained that fame by ‘standing up for all Americans’ because he ‘broke the law,’ and he would file lawsuits against unidentified persons after the criminal case was over,” prosecutors wrote.

Prosecutors recommended 30 days of imprisonment for Loftus, but Friedrich initially sentenced him to three years of probation.

For his probation violation, prosecutors requested a six-month prison sentence. They noted the Loftus, while on probation, also was arrested in December 2023 and charged with driving while intoxicated in Richardson, Texas. Loftus was required to attend a substance abuse program, but he avoided jail time for that violation.

Over 1,500 people have been charged with Capitol riot-related crimes. More than 1,000 of them have been convicted and sentenced, with roughly two-thirds receiving a term of imprisonment ranging from a few days to 22 years.

Trump has repeatedly vowed to pardon Capitol rioters, but the district court judges in Washington, D.C., typically have refused to postpone sentencing, plea hearings and trials until after the president-elect returns to the White House.


Tennessee Man Pleads Guilty to Assaulting Law Enforcement During Jan. 6 Capitol Breach

December 17, 2024: United States Attorney’s Office District of Columbia posted: “Tennessee Man Pleads Guilty to Assaulting Law Enforcement During the Jan. 6 Capitol Breach”.

A Tennessee man pleaded guilty today to assaulting law enforcement officers during the Jan. 6, 2021, breach of the U.S. Capitol. His alleged actions and the actions of others disrupted a joint session of the U.S. Congress convened to ascertain and count the electoral votes related to the 2020 presidential election.

Nicholas Waldon Smotherman, 41, of Mt. Juliet, Tennessee, pleaded guilty in U.S. District Court to the felony offense of assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers. The offense carries a maximum penalty of eight years in prison. A sentencing date is set for April 2025.

According to court documents, Smotherman was identified among a crowd of rioters on Jan. 6, 2021, amassed on the Upper West Plaza of the U.S. Capitol grounds. At approximately 2:28 p.m., a Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) officer’s body-worn camera captured Smotherman wearing body armor — specifically, a green MSA Paraclete Tactical Vest — standing in front of the bike racks and a police line on the southwest side of the Upper West Plaza.

Here, a group of rioters had begun pulling on the back racks. Smotherman was seen on body-worn camera next to the group, appearing to advance toward at an MPD officer. Police then commanded the rioters to move back. Instead, the rioters pulled the bike rack barricades to the ground, and Smotherman moved forward towards the police line. Smotherman then approached an MPD officer and pushed the officer with both hands.

The officer then attempted to push Smotherman back using a baton, but Smotherman stood upright and yelled, “Hit me with it again.” when the officer again attempted to push Smotherman back, Smotherman grabbed the officer’s baton and attempted to pull it away. As Smotherman acted, he yelled “I’ll f– take this” and “Come out here b –“. The officer managed to prevent Smotherman from taking the baton while another officer deployed pepper spray, and Smotherman retreated.

Soon after this, rioters overran the police line on the Upper West Plaza, and officers retreated to the Lower West Terrace. A large crowd of rioters then gathered in and around the entrance to the Lower west Terrace Door, referred to as the “Tunnel,” the site of some of the most violent attacks against law enforcement on January 6th. Smotherman was later identified in and around the Tunnel.

The FBI arrested Smotherman on August 2, 2024, in Hermitage, Tennessee.

This case was prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia and the Department of Justice National Security Division’s Counterterrorism Section. Valuable assistance was provided by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Tennessee.

The matter was investigated by the FBI’s Nashville and Washington Field Offices. Valuable assistance was provided by the U.S. Capitol Police and the Metropolitan Police Department. Smotherman was indemnified as Assault on Federal Officer (AFO) #364/

In the 47 months since Jan. 6, 2021, more than 1,572 individuals have been charged in nearly all 50 states for crimes rated to the breach of the U.S Capitol, including more than 590 individuals charged with assaulting or impeding law enforcement, a felony. The investigation remains ongoing.

December 18, 2024: The Tennessean reported: “Middle Tennessee man pleads guilty to assaulting a law enforcement officer, more in 2021 US Capital attack” It was written by Craig Shoup.

A Tennessee man pleaded guilty Tuesday to assaulting a law enforcement officer during the Jan. 6, 2021 breach of the U.S. Capitol.

Nicholas Waldon Smotherman, 41, of Mt. Juliet, pleaded guilty to multiple felonies, during the Jan. 6, 2021 breach of the U.S. Capitol.

Smotherman is scheduled to be sentenced on April 23.

“His alleged actions and the actions of others disrupted a joint session of the U.S. Congress convened to ascertain and count the electoral votes related to the 2020 presidential election,” a spokesperson with the United States District of Columbia said in a release.

Court documents show Smotherman was identified among a crowd of rioters on Jan. 6, 2021, who were amassed on the Upper West Plaza of the U.S. Capitol grounds.

The attorney’s office said the group of rioters began pulling on bike racks. Smotherman was seen on body-worn cameras next to the group appearing to advance toward police officers. When police commanded the rioters to move back, they pulled the bike rack barricade to the ground. Smotherman moved forward to the police line and then approached police and pushed an officer with both hands, prosecutors said.

The officer then attempted to push Smotherman back using a baton, but Smotherman stood upright and yelled, “Hit me with it again.” When the officer attempted to push Smotherman back, Smotherman grabbed the officer’s baton and tried to pull it away. As Smotherman acted, he yelled “I’ll f– take this” and “Come out her b—“. The officer managed to prevent Smotherman from taking the baton while another officer deployed pepper spray, and Smotherman retreated, the attorney’s office said.

After rioters overran the police line in the Upper West Plazas, a large crowd gathered around the entrance of the Lower West Terrace door, where some of the most violent attacks took place against law enforcement. Smotherman was later identified in and around the area.

The federal Bureau of Investigation arrested Smotherman on Aug. 2, 2024. in Hermitage.

He was among more than 1,572 people who have been arrested in connection with the riots on Jan. 6, 2021.

December 19, 2024: Yahoo! News reported: “Mt. Juliet man pleads guilty to assaulting authorities during Jan. 6. Capitol insurrection” It was written by Colleen Guerry.

A Mt. Juliet man pleaded guilty Tuesday to assaulting law enforcement during the breach of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) said 41-year-old Nicholas Waldon Smotherman pleaded guilty on Tuesday, Dec. 17, in U.S. District Court to felony assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers, which carries a penalty of up to eight years in prison. His sentencing date is set for April 23, 2025.

According to court documents, Smotherman was identified among a crowd of rioters on Jan. 6, 2021, on the Upper West Plaza of the U.S. Capitol grounds. Shortly before 2:30 p.m., a Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) officer’s body-worn camera captured Smotherman wearing body armor as he stood in front of the bike racks and a police line on the southwest side if the plaza.

The DOJ said Smotherman could be seen on the bodycam footage next to a group on the bike racks, appearing to advance toward an MPD officer. Police commanded the rioters to move back, but they pulled the bike rack barricades to the ground. Meanwhile, Smotherman moved forward the police line, approached an MPD officer, and pushed the officer with both hands.

Officials said the officer attempted to push Smotherman back using a baton, but Smotherman stood upright and yelled, “Hit me with it again.” When the officer tried again, Smotherman grabbed the officer’s baton and attempted to pull it away while yelling “I’ll f— take this” and “Come out her b—“. The officer prevented Smotherman from taking the baton while another officer deployed pepper spray, which made Smotherman retreat.

Soon after, rioters overran the police on the Upper West Plaza, so officers retreated to the Lower West Terrace, the DOJ said. Then, a large crowd of rioters gathered in and around the entrance to the Lower West Terrace door, which officials referred to as the ‘Tunnel,” calling it “the site of some of the most violent attacks against law enforcement” on Jan. 6, 2021. Smotherman was identified in and around the Tunnel.

According to officials, this case was prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia and the DOJ National Security Division’s Counterterrorism Section, with valuable assistance from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Tennessee. The FBI’s Nashville and Washington field offices investigated the matter, receiving help from the U.S. Capitol Police and the MPD.

“In the 47 months since Jan. 6, 2021, more than 1,572 individuals have been charged in nearly all 50 states for crimes related to the breach of the U.S. Capitol, including more than 590 individuals charged with assaulting or impeding law enforcement, a felony,” the DOJ said in a statement, adding the investigation remains ongoing.


October 3, 2024: The Republic reported: “Two Bartholomew County residents plead guilty in Jan. 6 case”

Two Bartholomew County men have pleaded guilty to assaulting law enforcement officers during the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol, bringing the total number of local residents who have pleaded guilty to participating in the failed insurrection to three.

James Link Behymer of Hope and Donald Lee Moss of Elizabethtown pleaded guilty on Thursday to one count of assaulting, resisting or impeding an officer during the U.S. Capitol attack, according to filings in the U.S. District Court in Washington D.C.

The offense carries a maximum sentence of eight years in prison, a $250,000 fine and up to three years of supervised release, according to court records.

U.S. District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan — who also is presiding over the criminal case against former President Donald Trump over his alleged efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election — scheduled a sentencing hearing for Feb. 13.

Behymer and Moss were released on personal recognizance, following a change-of-plea hearing on Thursday.

The guilty pleas come about two months after the two local residents signed plea agreements with federal prosecutors in which they agreed to plead guilty to one of several criminal charges. Behymer had originally been charged with six criminal offenses, while Moss had been charged with seven criminal offenses.

In the agreement, Behymer and Moss acknowledged being part of a “angry and violent” pro-trump rioters who surrounded and assaulted DC police a part of an effort to halt the certification of President Joe Biden’s victory in the 2020 election.

They also agreed to allow law enforcement officials to review their social media accounts and posts in an around Jan. 6, 2021, and interview them regarding the events in and around the U.S. Capitol attack prior to sentencing.

Based on the two men not having any prior felony convictions and that “the parties agree that (they) used violence or credible threats of violence in connection with the offense,” federal prosecutors calculated their sentencing guidelines to be 24 to 30 months in prison and a $10,000 to $95,000 fine, according to court records.

Federal prosecutors allege that Behymer and Moss were part of a group of “angry and violent rioters” who descended upon and assaulted D.C. Metropolitan police officers near the lower west terrace of the U.S. Capitol who were attempting to keep them from breeching the building on Jan. 6, 2021.

Federal authorities said in the complain that they were able to identify the two Bartholomew County men through cellphone records — including cellphone number with an 812 area code that connected to a cell site that provided service inside the U.S. Capitol during the insurrection — as ell as a witness described as a “longtime associate of Moss and Behymer” who identified the two defendants after being shown still images.

Federal prosecutors also included images they claim are the two men that were taken from officer’s body cameras and third-party footage.

The complaint alleges that Moss and Behymer shoved officers’ arms away from them as the group of rioters “surged toward the surrounded MPD officers and began violently assaulting the officers.” The complaint further alleges that Behymer struck an officer in the wrist and later attempted to pry a baton out of an officer’s hand while stating, “Now I’m being soft, but I do want this pole.”

Moss, who at one point shouted “This is our (explicative) house” while pointing at the Capitol, allegedly struck an officer’s arm and baton and forcefully pushed another police officer from behind during the attack, the complaint states.

The two Bartholomew County men made their way through the crowd and entered the U.S. Capitol and entered the Crypt, a valued space located underneath the Capitol Rotunda. They later exited the Capitol but reentered after rioters broke through a barricade set up by Capitol police at the Senate Wing doors.

After reentering, the returned to the Crypt an moved a sign that had been placed on a statue outside the Crypt’s entrance and put it on another statue before taking pictures of it, according to the complaint. One one side, the sign included the initials of the Chinese Communist Party with a circle and red line through it, while “America First” and “Never give up, never surrender”, were written on the other side.

When the two men left the area, Moss took the sign with him and was allegedly captured in video footage carrying the sign inside the U.S. Capitol, as well as outside the building.

In April 2021, former Columbus resident and former heavy metal musician Jon Shaffer pleaded guilty to storming the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, armed with bear spray.

Trump Lawsuits 0 comments on Insurrectionists Are Facing Consequences

Insurrectionists Are Facing Consequences

A drawing of a jail cell with bars by maz-Alph on Pixabay

Image by maz-Alph from Pixabay

Those who attacked their own nation’s capitol failed to consider the consequences for doing so.

On January 6, 2021, a mob of Donald Trump supporters staged an insurrection at the U.S. Capitol building. The Guardian reported that people stormed the chambers of the House and Senate while the Electoral College votes were being tallied.


Their actions did not change the outcome of the tally. Representatives and Senators returned to their work later that night to certify Joe Biden’s victory over Donald Trump in the 2020 election.

Many of the insurrectionists quickly found themselves facing consequences for their actions. Some now faced legal charges, and others lost their jobs.


The Company ID Badge Guy

January 9, 2021: CNN reported Navistar Direct Marketing provided them with the following statement:

Navistar Direct Marketing was made aware that a man wearing a Navistar company badge was seen inside the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021 during the security breach. After review of the photographic evidence the employee in question has been terminated for cause.

While we support all employee’s right to a peaceful, lawful exercise of free speech, any employee demonstrating dangerous conduct that endangers the health and safety of others will no longer have an employment opportunity with Navistar Direct Marketing.

The name of the man was not revealed by Navistar Direct Marketing. That said, several news websites have posted photos of the man inside the capitol wearing a lanyard that has his company name on it.

January 11, 2021: an FBI Special Agent wrote a Statement of Facts for U.S. Magistrate Judge Robin M. Mariweather.

Your affiant, [redacted], is a Special Agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Among my duties, I have been tasked with investigating criminal activity in and around the U.S. Capitol grounds that occurred on January 6, 2021. As a Special Agent, I am authorized by law or by a Government agency to engage in or supervise the prevention, detention, investigation, or prosecution of a violation of Federal criminal laws.

The U.S. Capitol is secured 24 hours a day by U.S. Capitol Police. Restrictions around the U.S. Capitol include permanent and temporary security barriers and posts manned by U.S. Capitol Police. Only authorized people with appropriate identification are allowed access inside the U.S. Capitol. On January 6, 2021, the exterior plaza of the U.S. Capitol was also closed to members of the public.

On January 6, 2021, a joint session of the United States Congress convened at the United States Capitol, which is located at First Street, SE, in Washington, D.C. During the joint session, elected members of the United States House of Representatives and the United States Senate were meeting in separate chambers of the United States Capitol to certify the vote count of the Electoral College of the 2020 Presidential Election, which had taken place on November 3, 2020. The joint session began at approximately 1:00 p.m. Vice President Mike Pence was present and presiding in the Senate Chamber.

With the joint session underway and with Vice President Mike Pence presiding, a large crowd gathered outside the U.S. Capitol. Temporary and permanent barricades surround the exterior of the U.S. Captiol building, and U.S. Capitol Police were present and attempting to keep the crowd away from the Capitol building and the proceedings underway inside. At approximately 2:00 p.m., certain individuals in the crowd forced their way through, up, and over the barricades and officers of the U.S. Capitol Police, and the crowd advanced to the exterior facade of the building. At such time, the joint session was still underway and the exterior doors and windows of the U.S. Capitol were locked or otherwise secured.

Members of the U.S. Capitol Police attempted to maintain order and keep the crowd from entering the Capitol; however, shortly after 2:00 p.m., individuals in the crowed forced entry into the U.S. Capitol, including bybreaking windows. Shortly thereafter, at approximately 2:20 p.m. members of the United States House of Representatives and United States Senate, including the President of the Senate, Vice President Mike Pence, were instructed to – and did – evacuate the chambers. Accordingly, the joint session of the United States Congress was effectively suspended until shortly after 8:00 p.m. Vice President Pence remained in the United States Capitol from the time he was evacuated from the Senate Chamber until the sessions resumed.

During national news coverage of the aforementioned events, video footage which appeared to be captured on mobile devices of persons present on the scene depicted evidence of violations of local and federal law, including scores of individuals inside the U.S. Capitol building without any authority to be there.

Media coverage of the events showed one of the rioters who entered the Capitol building dressed in a red hat that appeared to have the word “Trump” on it, carrying a large red flag reading “Trump is My President,” and wearing an apparent badge from the individual’s place of employment.

The individual appears to be a Caucasian male with a beard. The screenshots below of photographs posted on media sites show this individual in the halls of Congress. In the first image below, the individual is on the far right.

Several media outlets subsequently identified this individual as Nicholas RODEAN. In addition, on January 7, 2021, the FBI received screenshot images from the Facebook account of a restaurant located in Frederick, Maryland suggesting that “Nicholas Rodean” was a “former weekend employee” at the restaurant who “lives in downtown Frederick” and participated in the violent, civil unrest and rioting at the U.S. Capitol Building in Washington D.C. on January 6, 2021.

The poster to the account identified RODEAN as the individual in the front of the third photograph reproduced above. Another employee who formerly worked with RODEAN also identified him, on social media, as the individual in the second photograph identified above.

Finally, a news outlet reported that a business in Frederick, Maryland had terminated RODEAN after becoming aware of the images of the individual pictured above. The news outlet reported that RODEAN had been wearing that business’ badge. A badge can be clearly seen in the above photographs. News articles also showed a posting from the business’s Facebook account confirming the termination.

Your affiant has confirmed these identifications of RODEAN. First, the photographs of RODEAN in the U.S. Capitol display unique attire and a clear view of the individual’s face. Your affiant has viewed pictures posted to the LinkedIn account for Nicholas Rodean, which still lists him as working for the resturant with the Facebook account. The person in the photograph appears to be the same individual in the pictures at the U.S. Capitol. Further, RODEAN has also been identified by law enforcement through open source data bases, including Maryland DMV driver’s license records, as the person depicted inside the Capitol on January 6, 2021.

Finally, on January 8, 2021, an attorney who stated that he represented RODEAN called in to the Washington Field Office of the FBI, to voluntarily speak with law enforcement. Your affient spoke on the phone with the attorney, who confirmed that RODEAN would like to turn himself in to law enforcement. Your affiant informed the attorney that he would contact the attorney again once charges had been brought against RODEAN.

Based on the foregoing, your affiant submits that there is probable cause to believe that Nicholas RODEAN violated 18 U.S.C. § 1752(a)(1) and (2), which makes it a crime to (1) knowingly enter or remain in any restricted building or grounds without lawful authority to do; (2) knowingly, and with intent to impede or disrupt the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions, engage in disorderly or disruptive conduct in, or within such proximity to, any restricted building or grounds when, or so that, such conduct, in fact, impedes or disrupts the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions; or attempts or conspires to do so.

For purposes of Section 1752 of Title 18, a “restricted building” includes a posted, cordoned off, or otherwise restricted area of a building or grounds where the President or other person protected by the Secret Service, including the Vice President, is or will be temporarily visiting; or any building or grounds so restricted in conjunction with an event designated as a special event of national significance. Your affiant submits there is also probable cause to believe that Nicholas Rodean violated 40 U.S.C. § 5104(e)(2)(G), which makes it a crime to willfully and knowingly parade, demonstrate, or picket in any of the Capitol Buildings.

March 19, 2021: A Grand Jury indicted Nicholas Rodean with the following:

The Grand Jury charges that:

COUNT ONE: On or about January 2021, within the District of Columbia and elsewhere, NICHOLAS RODEAN attempted to, and did, corruptly obstruct, influence, and impede an official proceeding, that is, a proceeding before Congress, by entering and remaining in the United States Capitol without authority and engaging in disorderly and disruptive conduct and destroying federal property.

(Obstruction of an Official Proceeding and Aiding and Abetting, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1512(c)(2) and 2)

COUNT TWO: On or about January 6, 2021, within the District of Columbia, NICHOLAS RODEAN did willfully injure and commit depredation against property of the United States, and of any department and agency thereof, and any property which has been and is being manufactured and constructed for the United States, and any department or agency thereof, that is a window, causing damage in an amount more than $1000.

(Destruction of Government Property, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1361).

COUNT THREE: On or about January 6, 2021, in the District of Columbia, NICHOLAS RODEAN did unlawfully and knowingly enter and remain in a restricted building and grounds, that is, any posted, cordoned-off, and otherwise restricted area within the United States Capitol and its grounds, where the Vice President and Vice President-elect were temporarily visiting, without lawful authority to do so.

(Entering and Remaining in a Restricted Building or Grounds, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1752(a)(1))

COUNT FOUR: On or about January 6, 2021, in the District of Columbia, NICHOLAS RODEAN did knowingly, and with intent to impede and disrupt the orderly of Government business and official functions, engage in disorderly and disruptive conduct in and within such proximity to, a restricted building and ground, that is, any posted, cordoned-off, and otherwise restricted area within the United States Capitol and its grounds, where the Vice President and Vice President-elect were temporarily visiting, when and so that such conduct did in fact impede and disrupt the orderly conduct of Government business and official functions.

(Disorderly and Disruptive Conduct in a Restricted Building or Grounds, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1752(a)(2))

COUNT FIVE: On or about January 6, 2021, in the District of Columbia, NICHOLAS RODEAN did knowingly, engage in any act of physical violence against any person and property in a restricted building and grounds, that is, any posted, cordoned-off, and otherwise restricted area within the United States Capitol and its grounds, where the Vice President and Vice President-elect were temporarily visiting.

(Engaging in Physical Violence in a Restricted Building or Grounds, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1752(a)(4))

COUNT SIX: On or about January 6, 2021, in the District of Columbia, NICHOLAS RODEAN willfully and knowingly engaged in disorderly and disruptive conduct in any of the Captiol Buildings with the intent to impede, disrupt, and disturb the orderly conduct of a session of Congress and either House of Congress, and the orderly conduct in that building of a hearing before or any deliberation of a committee of Congress or either House of Congress.

(Disorderly Conduct in a Capitol Building, in violation of Title 40, United States Code, Section 5104(e)(2)(D))

COUNT SEVEN: On or about January 6, 2021, in the District of Columbia, NICHOLAS RODEAN willfully and knowingly engaged in an act of physical violence within the United States Capitol Grounds and any of the Capitol Buildings.

(Act of Physical Violence in the Capitol Grounds of Buildings, in violation of Title 40, United States Code, Section 5104(e)(2)(F))

COUNT EIGHT: On or about January 6, 2021, in the District of Columbia, NICHOLAS RODEAN willfully and knowingly paraded, demonstrated and picketed in any United States Capitol Building.

(Parading, Demonstrating, or Picketing in a Capitol Building, in violation of Title 40, United States Code, Section 5104(e)(2)(G))

July 12, 2022: “Maryland Man Among First To Breach U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6 Convicted of a Felony and Several Misdemeanors” It was written by Adam Klasfeld.

A Maryland man who counted himself among the first Donald Trump supporters to storm the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6 was convicted on Tuesday of a felony and six misdemeanors.

Nicholas Rodean, a 28-year-old from Fredrick, broke windowpanes next to the Senate door, leading to his felony charge of destruction of government property, prosecutors say.

Arrested on Jan. 13, 2021, Rodean wore his allegiance to the former president on his red cap and branded “TRUMP” and holding a flag “TRUMP IS MY PRESIDENT.” He was seen in court papers brandishing that banner on a staircase inside the building.

Rodean also had a badge from his workplace hanging from his neck, the FBI noted in its statement of facts.

U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden, a Trump appointee, found Rodean guilty of destroying government property and six other charges during a bench trial.

The misdemeanor counts were entering and remaining in a restricted building or grounds, disorderly and disruptive conduct in a Capitol Building, engaging in physical violence in a restricted building or grounds, disorderly conduct in a Capitol Building, committing an act of physical violence in the Capitol grounds of a Capitol Building, and parading, demonstrating, or picketing in a Capitol Building.

McFadden had previously handed federal prosecutors their only defeat to date on the Jan. 6 docket, quitting New Mexico man Matthew Martin of four misdemeanor charges against him. Martin, who reportedly called Jan. 6 a “magical day,” had “reasonably believed” that he was allowed him inside the building, the Trump appointee found.

In Rodean’s case, McFadden would grant no similar break.

Prosecutors say that Rodean climbed through the empty frame of a window glass that he had broken around 2:13 p.m. Eastern Time, becoming the 15th rioter to illegally enter the building.

“Once inside the building, Rodean joined a small crowd of rioters in pursuing a Capitol Police officer up two flights of stairs to the second floor,” the Department of Justice wrote in a press release. “He proceeded to a long hallway, known as the Ohio Clock corridor, outside the floor of the Senate Chamber, where he remained for more than 30 minutes.

At one point a Capitol Police officer noticed a small round object, appearing to be a small cannonball, in Rodean’s hand. He and another officer convinced Rodean to put away the object. Rodean then took out a hatchet, which the officers also convinced him to put away. After posing for a photo while waiving his flag, Rodean was one of the last rioters to leave the Ohio Clock corridor. He exited the building at about 2:55 p.m.”

Judge McFadden scheduled Rodean’s sentencing for Oct. 21, 2022. The felony count carries a maximum 10-year sentence and the misdemeanors add up to a possible 4.5 years of additional time.

His conviction was announced less than an hour before the House Select Committee to Investigate that Jan. 6 Attack on the U.S. Capitol is expected to hold its next public hearing, focusing on Trump’s ties to extremist groups like the Oath Keepers, Proud Boys, and the QAnon movement.


The Guy Wearing Fur Pelts And Carrying A Walking Stick

You may have seen photos on Twitter of a man wearing round glasses, fur pelts, and carrying a wooden walking stick who was inside the capitol. There is a photo of him sitting on a leather bench while holding a Capitol Police riot shield and wearing a Capitol Police officer’s bullet proof vest.

January 11, 2021, a Criminal Complaint warrant was filed by a Special Agent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The complaint was addressed to U.S. Magistrate Judge Zia M. Faruqui. The complaint includes a photo of Aaron Mostofsky that was posted on New York Post.

January 6, 2021, your affiant, Michael Attard was on duty and performing my official duties as a Special Agent. Specifically, I am assigned to the Counter-terrorism squad tasked with investigating criminal activity in and around the Capitol grounds. As a Special Agent, I am authorized by law or by a Government agency to engage in or supervise the prevention, detention, investigation or prosecution of a violation of Federal criminal laws.

The U.S. Capitol is secured 24 hours a day by U.S. Capitol Police. Restrictions around the U.S. Capitol include permanent and temporary security barriers and posts manned by the U.S. Capitol Police. Only authorized people with appropriate identification are allowed access inside the U.S. Capitol. On January 6, 2021, the exterior plaza of the U.S. Capitol was also closed to members of the public.

January 6, 2021, a joint session of the United States Congress convened at the United States Capitol, which is located at First Street, SE, in Washington D.C. During the joint session, elected members of the United States House of Representatives and the United States Senate were meeting in separate chambers of the United States Capitol to certify the vote count of the Electoral College of the 2020 Presidential Election, which had taken place on November 3rd, 2020.

The joint session began at approximately 1:00 p.m. Vice President Mike Pence was present and presiding in the Senate Chamber.

With the joint session underway and with Vice President Mike Pence presiding, a large crowd gathered outside the U.S. Capitol building, and U.S. Capitol Police were present and attempting to keep the crowd away from the Capitol building and the proceedings underway inside.

At approximately 2:00 p.m., certain individuals in the crowd forced their way through, up, and over the barricades and officers of the U.S. Capitol Police, and the crows advanced to the exterior façade of the building. At such time, the joint session was still underway and the exterior doors and windows of the Capitol were locked or otherwise secured.

Members of the U.S. Capitol Police attempted to maintain order and keep the crowd from entering the Capitol; however, shortly after 2:00 p.m., individuals in the crowd forced entry into the U.S. Capitol, including by breaking windows.

Shortly thereafter, at approximately 2:20 p.m. members of the United States House of Representatives and the United States Senate, including the President of the Senate, Vice President Mike Pence, were instructed to — and did — evacuate the chambers. Accordingly, the joint session of the United States Congress was effectively suspended until shortly after 8:00 p.m. Vice President Pence remained in the United States Capitol from the time he was evacuated from the Senate Chamber until the sessions resumed.

During national news coverage of the aforementioned events, video footage which appeared to be captured on mobile devices of persons present on the scene depicted evidence of violations of local and federal law, including scores of individuals inside the U.S. Capitol building without authority to be there.

On January 6, 2021, the subject who identified himself to a New York Post reporter in an interview was profiled in a New York Post article titled, “NYC man says he stormed the US Capitol to fight stolen election.” In the video interview, “Aaron” explained his actions by stating: “the election was stolen,” “we were cheated,” and “I don’t think 75 million people voted for Trump. I think it was close to 85 million.”

“Aaron” continued to tell the interviewer that he traveled from Brooklyn, NY. The New York Post video interview was conducted inside the Capitol Building, during which “Aaron” is observed carrying what appears to be a US Capitol Police riot shield containing the US Capitol Police logo, as well as wearing a US Capitol Police officer’s bullet proof vest labeled “Police”. An image captured from the video interview is provided below.

In the video interview “Aaron” states that he took a police riot shield that he found on floor. “Aaron” then motioned to the police vest on his chest, in what appears to be him indicating that he also found that item on the floor and took it into his possession. He also states that he found a hat on the ground but he returned that item to a police officer because that might be someone’s personal item.

The police riot shield and police vest are items of value belonging to the United States, specifically the US Capitol Police. The police vest is comprised of a carrier, body plates within the vest, and side ballistics, with a total value of $1,905.00. The riot shield is valued at $256.65.

January 7, 2021, your affiant located a second article from the New York Post titled, “NYC man who breached the US Capitol is son of a prominent Brooklyn judge,” The article identified “Aaron” as Aaron Mostofsky. In a search of a New York State Department of Motor Vehicle images, associated with Aaron Mostofsky revealed a photograph that matched the description of the individual interviewed within the U.S. Capitol known was “Aaron.”

January 7, 2021, an FBI review of social media accounts belonging to Aaron Mostofsky identified an Instagram account “aaron_mostofsky_official” which contained videos taken both inside and outside the US Capitol taken by a male believed to be Mostofsky. One video posted on January 6, 2021, which appears to show Mostofsky on a bus, and appears to be a self-taken video, was labeled “DC bound stopthesteal”.

January 8, 2021, a search warrant was issued by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York related to the Instagram account “aaron_mostofsky_official.” The user of the account was confirmed as Aaron Mostofsky. Review of these records show additional posts regarding he Mostofsky presence in the U.S. Capitol Building.

January 7, 2021, your affiant located a second article from the New York Post titled, “NYC man who breached the US Capitol is son of a prominent Brooklyn judge,” The article identified “Aaron” as Aaron Mostofsky. In a search of a New York State Department of Motor Vehicle images, associated with Aaron Mostofsky revealed a photograph that matched the description of the individual interviewed within the U.S. Capitol known was “Aaron.”

January 7, 2021, an FBI review of social media accounts belonging to Aaron Mostofsky identified an Instagram account “aaron_mostofsky_official” which contained videos taken both inside and outside the US Capitol taken by a male believed to be Mostofsky. One video posted on January 6, 2021, which appears to show Mostofsky on a bus, and appears to be a self-taken video, was labeled “DC bound stopthesteal”.

January 8, 2021, a search warrant was issued by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York related to the Instagram account “aaron_mostofsky_official.” The user of the account was confirmed as Aaron Mostofsky. Review of these records show additional posts regarding he Mostofsky presence in the U.S. Capitol Building.

In a separate post made by Mostofsky at approximately 6:09 AM on January 6, 2020, he indicates that he is … “on this bus going to DC.” Furthermore, when trying to coordinate meeting up with a friend within the group on January 6, 2020, Mostofsky’s message states: If we find each other look for a guy looking like a caveman.” He later states, in a likely reference to the presidential election: “Even a caveman knows it was stolen.”

Based on the foregoing, your affiant submits there is a probable cause to believe that Aaron Mosto violated 18 U.S.C. § 641, which makes it a crime for a person to embezzle, steal, purloin, or knowingly convert to his use of another, or without authority, sell, convey, or dispose of any record, voucher, money, or thing of value of the United States or any department or agency thereof; or receive, conceal, or retain the same with intent to convert it to his use or gain, knowing it to have been embezzled, stolen, purloined or converted.

As the value of the thing taken is greater than $1,000, there is probable cause to believe that Aaron Mostofsky has committed a felony offense.

Also, your affiant submit that there is probably cause to believe that Aaron Mostofsky, violated 18 U.S.C. § 1752(a)(1) and (2), which makes it a crime to (1) knowingly enter or remain in any restricted building or grounds without lawful authority to do so; (2) knowingly, and with intent to impede or disrupt the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions, engage in disorderly or disruptive conduct in, or within such proximity to, any restricted building or grounds when, or so that, such conduct, in fact, impedes or disrupts the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions;

For purposes of Section 1752 of Title 18, a “restricted building” includes a posted, cordoned off, or otherwise restricted area of a building or grounds where the President or other person protected by Secret Service, including the Vice President, is or will be temporarily visiting; or any building or grounds so restricted in conjunction with an event designated as a special event of national significance.

Finally, your affiant submits there is also probable cause to believe that Aaron Mostofsky violated 40 U.S.C. § 5104(e)(2)(D) & (G), which makes it a crime to willfully and knowingly (D) utter loud, threatening, or abusive language, or engage in disorderly or disruptive conduct, at any place in the Grounds or in any of the Capitol Buildings with the intent to impede, disrupt, or disturb the orderly conduct of a session of Congress or either House of Congress, or the orderly conduct in that building of a hearing before, or any deliberations of, a committee of Congress or either House of Congress; and (G) parade, demonstrate, or picket in any of the Capitol Buildings.

January 12, 2021: Son of Brooklyn judge charged in federal court for role in Capitol riot. (Politico)

The son of a Brooklyn judge was arrested and hit with federal criminal charges for his participation in the pro-Trump siege of the U.S. Capitol last week.

Aaron Mostofsky appeared virtually in Brooklyn federal court Tuesday on a felony charge of theft of federal property, and charges of illegally entering a restricted government building and disorderly conduct disrupting a session of Congress.

Mostofsky is the son of Brooklyn Supreme Court Judge Shlomo Mostofsky, a leader in the city’s conservative Orthodox community. He is seen in photos inside the Capitol dressed in fur pelts, wearing a Capitol Police officers’s bullet proof vest and holding a Capitol Police riot shield.

He was released on $100,000 bond after agreeing not to attend any political gatherings or visit any state Capitol — and not to leave New York City unless court officials approve. He will stay at his brother’s home in Brooklyn.

Mostofsky is accused of “taking part in what was a mob attack and a rampage on the U.S. Capitol,” said assistant U.S. Attorney Josh Hafetz. “Given the events of last week, the government is deeply troubled by the conduct of the defendant.”

The defendant’s attorney, Jeffrey Schwartz, said he will steer clear of politics.

“The evidence will show that he was not part of the mob and he was not rampaging,” Schwartz said.

“But he understands the gravity of what he’s being charged with. He understands how the whole thing in Washington got totally out of hand,” he added. “His only interest now is to address these charges and to hopefully get a resolution that’s just.”

A criminal complaint cites an interview Mostofsky did with the New York Post from inside the Capitol, claiming that “the election was stolen” and “we were cheated.”

The complaint estimates that the bullet proof vest he took was worth $1,905, while the riot shield is valued at $256.65 — making Mostofsky liable for a felony for stealing federal government property worth more than $1,000.

The complaint also charges he posted photos and videos from inside the Capitol on his Instagram account. When another user sent him a message saying “Your famous,” he wrote back “IK [I know] unfortunately.” He also wrote of his presence in the Capitol, “But it was like I’m here now how did I get there.”

January 12, 2021: ABC News reported: “Fur-pelted man photographed with Capitol police shield facing 4 federal charges.” It was written by Aaron Katersky and Celia Darrough.

The man who was photographed Wednesday in the Capitol wearing fur pelts and a bulletproof police vest while holding a Capitol Police riot shield was arrested Tuesday and later released on bond in connection with the Capitol riot led by pro-Trump supporters.

The FBI arrested Aaron Mostofsky, sone of a prominent New York Judge, at his brother’s home in Brooklyn on Tuesday morning.

The FBI arrested Aaron Mostofsky at his brother’s home in Brooklyn. Hours later, he appeared in a Brooklyn federal court where prosecutors called his alleged actions “a mob attack and a rampage through the U.S. Capitol.”

Mostofsky, 34, is facing four charges, including felony theft of government property, knowingly entering a restricted building without lawful authority, engaging in disorderly conduct on Capitol grounds with intent to impede government business, and unlawful entry and disorderly conduct, according to a criminal complaint filed Monday.

At the Tuesday court hearing, Assistant U.S. Attorney Josh Hafetz said there is video of Mostofsky “inside the Capitol with a police officer’s riot shield and appearing to wear a police officer’s bulletproof vest, neither of which he had the right to.”

“We have concerns about Mr. Mostofsky,” Hafetz added.

Mostofsky’s attorney, Jeffery Schwartz, told the court he believes the evidence will show his client was not part of the mob.

“He was not rampaging. He got caught up in it,” Schwartz said. “He understands how the whole thing in Washington got totally out of hand.”

Judge Sanket Bulsara agreed to release Mostofky on a $100,000 bond, with restrictions that require him to stay in the New York City area and prevent him from having any contact with any co-defendants or co-conspirators, participating in political gatherings or entering any state capitols.

Regarding the ban on state capitols, Havetz noted there is a “potential for such gatherings. It is important for Mr. Mostofky not to engage in the behavior he engaged in yesterday.”

“The police riot shield and police vest are items of value belonging to the United States, specifically the US Capitol Police,” the complaint read, noting that the vest is valued at $1,905 and the shield at $256.65.

The complaint cited the Post interview which appeared to have been conducted inside the Capitol building. During the interview, the complaint pointed out, Mostofsky explained his actions by stating he believed the election was stolen, adding, “We were cheated. I don’t think 75 million people voted for Trump — I think it was close to 85 million.”

According to the complaint, Mostofsky indicated in the Post interview that he found the bulletproof vest and the shield on the floor.

Mostofsky’s father, Shlomo Mostofsky, is a Kings County Supreme Court judge.

A spokesman for the judge said the elder Mostofsky had “no knowledge” of what happened in Washington D.C. The judge declined to comment on his son’s arrest.

A search warrant for Mostofsky’s Instagram account was executed, and records of conversations show Mostofsky confirming the fur-pelted man is him, according to the complaint. A Facebook search also showed that in November 2018, Mostofsky wrote, “Since the republicans lost the house I have the following questions 1 when and where are we protesting/rioting…” the complaint stated.

Many arrests have been made since Wednesday’s riots, including the man photographed in House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s office with his feet on her desk, the man photographed carrying Pelosi’s lectern and the man wearing a horned fur hat, as well as a state lawmaker from West Virginia.

Mostofsky faces a maximum of 10 years in prison if convicted of the top charge, 18 USC 641, theft of government property.

“While we all respect each other’s ability to peacefully exercise their First Amendment rights, acts in violation of federal law will not be tolerated.” William F. Sweeney Jr., assistant director in charge of the FBI’s New York field office, said in a statement. “For those in this area considering participating in future activity similar to Mr. Mostofsky’s alleged behavior, let me be clear: The FBI will find you, arrest you, and do our part to ensure you face the full force of the federal criminal justice system.”

Five people died during the violent siege on the Capitol, including a Capitol Police officer who died from injuries sustained during the attack.


The “QAnon Shaman”

There were plenty of news sites posting photos of the guy who had been referred to as the “QAnon Shaman”. Some of the photos showed him wearing a fur hat that had animal tails and horns attached to it, brown pants, and no short. He had large tattoos on his torso. His face was painted in red, white, and blue.

January 6, 2021, AZ Central posted “Longtime Arizona QAnon supporter in horned helmet joins storming of U.S. Capitol”. It was written by Richard Ruelas.

Among the supporters of President Donald Trump who mobbed their way into the U.S. Capitol on Tuesday, one – unmistakable in his fur, horned hat, and painted face, was Jake Angeli, a QAnon supporter who has been a fixture at Arizona right-wing political rallies over the past year.

Angeli was seen in photographs from Washington, D.C., amid protesters who turned violent and stormed the building, causing both chambers to suspend their intended action of the day: certifying the results of the presidential election for former vice president Joe Biden.

At one point, Angeli was seen on the dais of the U.S. Senate. He posed for a photo flexing his right arm; his left was holding a spear from which he hung a U.S. flag.

Since at least 2019, Angeli has held forth outside the Arizona Capitol shouting about various conspiracy theories, most related to the wide-ranging beliefs espoused by QAnon.

Angeli, in a 2020 interview with The Arizona Republic, said that he wears the fur bonnet, paints his face and walks around shirtless with ragged pants as a way to attract attention.

Then, he said, he is able to speak to people about his beliefs about QAnon and other truths he says remain hidden.

The QAnon school of thought supposes that a high-level government agent with Q-level security clearance has been unspooling cryptic clues about secret investigations inside Washington, D.C. Some of those investigations involve politicians running a child sex trafficking ring.

In February 2020, Angeli worked the crowd outside a rally in Phoenix for Trump.

He held up a tattered sign that said, “Q sent me,” and asked the crowd is they knew of the conspiracy. Several met him with affirmative nod.

“The snowball has been rolling and it’s only getting bigger,” Angeli said at the time. “We’re the mainstream now.”

Reached on his cellphone Wednesday evening, Angeli refused an interview with The Republic.

He did speak with a correspondent from The Globe and Mail of Toronto, according to a Tweet from that reporter, saying that the police had stopped trying to block him and other Trump supporters and let them into the Capitol. After some time, according to the Tweet, Angeli said police politely asked him to leave.

Angeli was a fixture at rallies to re-open Arizona businesses shuttered by the government as a measure to prevent the spread of COVID-19. He has also been at rallies contesting the Arizona election results.

Besides the government corruption espoused by QAnon, Angeli believes that leaders have conspired to keep blockbuster scientific discoveries from the public in order to maintain the system as it is.

Angeli said that he discovered much of what he found through his own research on the Internet. That research — which included “Behold a Pale Horse” by the Arizona author William Copper — involved shadowy groups, including the Illuminati, Trilateral Commission and Bilderberg group, that control the world.

“At a certain point, it all clicked in a way,” he said. “Oh my God. I see now the reality of what’s going on.”

The Q movement, he said, validated his beliefs he had held as far back as 2016.

January 8, 2021: A Special Agent with the United States Capitol Police wrote a Statement of Facts for U.S. Magistrate Judge G. Michael Harvey.

On January 6, 2021, your affiant, [Redacted], was on duty and performing my official duties as a Special Agent with the United States Capitol Police. Specifically, I am assigned to the Criminal Investigations Section, tasked with investigating criminal activity in and around the Capitol grounds. As a Special Agent with the United States Capitol Police, I am authorized by law, or by a Government agency to engage in or supervise the prevention, detention, investigation, or prosecution of a violation of Federal criminal laws.

The U.S. Capitol is secured 24 hours a day by U.S. Capitol Police. Restrictions around the U.S. Capitol include permanent and temporary security barriers and posts manned by U.S. Capitol Police. Only authorized people with appropriate identification are allowed access inside the U.S. Capitol. On January 6, 2021, the exterior plaza of the U.S. Capitol was also closed to members of the public.

With the joint session underway and with Vice President Mike Pence presiding, a large crowd gathered outside the U.S. Capitol. Temporary and permanent barricades surround the exterior of the U.S. Capitol building, and U.S. Capitol Police were present and attempting to keep the crowd away from the Capitol building and the proceedings underway inside.

At approximately 2:00 p.m., certain individuals in the crowd forced their way through, up, and over the barricades and officers of the U.S. Capitol Police, and the crowd advanced to the exterior facade of the building. At such time, the joint session was still underway and the exterior doors and windows of the U.S. Capitol were locked or otherwise secured.

Members of the U.S. Capitol Police attempted to maintain order and keep the crowd from entering the Capitol; however, shortly after 2:00 p.m., individuals in the crowd forced entry into the U.S. Capitol; however, shortly after 2:00 p.m., individuals in the crowd forced entry into the U.S. Capitol, including by breaking windows.

Shortly thereafter, at approximately 2:20 p.m., members of the United States House of Representatives and the United States Senate, including the President of the Senate, Vice President Mike Pence, were instructed to – and did – evacuate the chambers. Accordingly, the joint session of the United States Congress was effectively suspended until shortly after 8:00 p.m. Vice President Pence remained in the United States Capitol from the time he was evacuated from the Senate Chamber until the sessions resumed.

Media coverage of these events showed one of the rioters who entered the Capitol building dressed in horns, a bearskin headdress, red, white, and blue face paint, shirtless, and tan pants. This individual carried a spear, approximately 6 feet in length, with an American flag tied just below the blade. The screenshots below of photographs posted on Twitter show this individual in the halls of Congress and standing on the dais inside the Senate chamber.

Several media outlets subsequently identified this individual as Jacob Anthony CHANSLEY, a.k.a. Jake Angeli. Your affiant has confirmed this identification of CHANSLEY. First, the photographs of CHANSLEY in the U.S. Capitol display unique attire and extensive tattoos covering his arms and the left side of his torso. Your affiant has viewed pictures posted to the Facebook account for Jake Angeli on December 13, 2020, in which CHANSLEY bears these same distinctive attire and tattoos.

In addition, CHANSLEY has a YouTube channel under the name Jacob Chansley, on which a video posted of CHANSLEY from 2019 shows CHANSLEY with sleeve tattoos on the lower half of his arms consistent with the sleeve tattoos CHANSLEY displays in photographs taken in the Capitol on January 6, 2021. Finally, CHANSLEY has also been identified by law enforcement through open source data bases, including his Arizona DMV driver’s license photo, as the person depicted inside the Capitol and on the Senate dais on January 6, 2021.

In addition, on January 7, 2021, CHANSLEY called in to the Washington Field Office of the FBI, to voluntarily speak with law enforcement. Your affiant and an FBI agent spoke on the phone with CHANSLEY, who confirmed that he was the male in the face paint and headdress in the Vice President’s chair in the Senate. CHANSLEY stated that he came as a part of a group effort, with other “patriots” from Arizona, at the request of the President that all “patriots” come to D.C. on January 6, 2021.

Based on the foregoing, your affiant submits there is probable cause to believe that CHANSLEY violated 18 U.S.C. § 1752(a)(1) and (2), which makes it a crime to (1) knowingly, and with intent to impede or disrupt the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions, engage in disorderly conduct in, or within such proximity to, any restricted building or grounds when, or so that, such conduct, in fact, impedes or disrupts the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions; or attempts or conspires to do so.

For purposes of Section 1752 of Title 18, a “restricted building” includes a posted, cordoned off, or otherwise restricted area of a building or grounds where the President or other person protected by the Secret Service, including the Vice President, is or will be temporarily visiting; or any building or grounds so restricted in conjunction with an event designated as a special event of national significance.

Your affiant submits there is also probable cause to believe that CHANSLEY violated 40 U.S.C. § 5104(e)(2)(A) and (G), which makes it a crime to willfully and knowingly (A) enter or remain on the floor of either House of Congress or in any cloakroom or lobby adjacent to that floor, in the Rayburn Room of the House of Representatives, or in the Marble Room of the Senate, unless authorized to do so pursuant to rules adopted, or an authorization given, by that House; and (G) parade, demonstrate, or picket in any of the Capitol Buildings.

January 7, 2021: POLITIFACT reported: “There’s no proof antifa stormed the Capitol. The rumor spread quickly anyway”

In a violent scene like no other in American history, a sprawling crowd of President Donald Trump’s supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol and halted congressional proceedings, wearing and waving Trump-branded paraphernalia and flags as they sought to overturn the election.

Lawmakers were evacuated as the rioters overwhelmed Capitol Police and bashed through the building’s doors and windows. One woman was fatally shot, and at least three others died.

The march to the Capitol was weeks in the making. Trump urged his supporters to come to Washington. Plans indicating the potential for violence were drawn up in the open on social media forums and pro-Trump websites.

“Storm the Capitol,” one user on TheDonald, a site for Trump supporters, wrote on Jan. 2, after another asked what would happen if Congress refused to flip the election in Trump’s favor.

Despite all of the groundwork and documentary evidence, social media users and allies of the president floated an alternative explanation for the insurrection.

The siege was not the fault of Trump supporters, they said. Instead, it was led by Antifa, a broad left-wing coalition of anti-fascists activities.

There’s no evidence that’s the case, and specific individuals who were rumored to be antifa activists don’t actually support the movement. One man identified as an “antifa thug,” for example, was a known supporter of the baseless Qanon conspiracy theory who also backs Trump.

There’s also no evidence that the mob was a “false flag” attack led by antifa activists aiming to make Trump supporters look bad or push a liberal agenda, as some people suggested.

Still, the false narrative traveled between message boards, social media, and some of the loudest conservative voices in media and politics. It reached the House floor when Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., suggested the Capitol’s breach was led by the activists in disguise.

“There is no evidence of antifa involvement, and he notion that they would pretend to be far-right militants in this context makes absolutely no sense,” said Mark Bray, a historian and part-time lecturer at Rutgers University who wrote a book about antifa.

How the rumors spread

Mentions of “antifa” and “false-flag” started to take off on 4chan, an anonymous online forum, around noon on Jan. 6, according to data from the Social Media Analysis Toolkit.

A little after 1 p.m. EST, when rioters pushed past barricades at the Capitol, posts in pro-Trump Facebook groups claimed antifa activists were to blame. They cited a Breitbart live stream that showed rioters brandishing Trump paraphernalia. Some speculated that antifa was involved.

“I do not believe that the group of people who ‘broke through security’ at the Capitol were actually Trump supporters,” said Kevin McCollough, a radio personality, in one of he earliest posts PolitiFact identified. “There have been multiple reports that antifa was planning on infiltrating the crowds.”

The antifa narrative soon gained traction on Parler, a social media platform popular with conservatives, and on Twitter. An NBC News analysis identified thousands of tweets posted on Jan. 6 that alleged that antifa activists were “posing” as Trump supporters.

Lin Wood, an attorney who has filed lawsuits seeking to overturn the presidential election, said on Parler that he had “indisputable photographic evidence” of antifa involvement. Twitter suspended his account for claiming the Capitol breach was “staged.”

Former Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin warned of “fake DC ‘patriots” used a PLANTS.” Other Republican politicians promoted similar rumors about antifa, including Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, Rep. Paul Gosar of Arizona, and Rep. Mo Brooks of Alabama.

“Rumor: ANTIFA facists in backwards MAGA hats,” Brooks tweeted at 2:20 p.m. EST.

“This has all the hallmarks of Antifa provocation, ” Gosar wrote at 5:04 p.m. EST.

The rumors grew more prominent on TV news networks that evening.

“We did have some advanced warning that there might be some antifa element masquerading as Trump supporters in advance of the attack on the Capitol,” Brooks told Fox News host Lou Dobbs, repeating the rumor he shared on Twitter.

Similar speculation came during other Fox News programs hosted by Tucker Carlson, Sean Hannity and others. Fellow host Laura Ingraham said the rioters “were likely not all Trump supporters.” Newsman aired similar claims.

Those broadcasts came before Congress reconvened to count the electoral votes and confirm Joe Biden’s victory The next morning, radio show host Rush Limbaugh drove the false narrative home to millions of listeners.

“Republicans do not join protest mobs, they do not loot, and they don’t riot to the grand disappointment of many people,” Limbaugh said. “But a tiny minority of these protesters, and undoubtedly including some antifa Democrat-sponsored instigators, did decide to go to the Capitol to protest.”

No evidence antifa was behind the riot

There’s no way to identify everyone who participated, and the investigations by law enforcement agencies, including the FBI are underway. But no one claiming that antifa activists stormed the Capitol has provided legitimate proof.

The evidence that Trump supported participated, however, is indisputable.

Video and photographs from the scene show people wearing and waving Trump-branded hats, T-shirts and flags. Some rioters celebrated their participation or live-screamed the events, including a West Virginia GOP lawmaker.

Trump’s supporters had planned a Washington rally for weeks. Trump tweeted his invitation and welcomed their presence. Speaking to the large crowd of supporters hours before the violence erupted, he urged a march to Congress and suggested he would join. He did not.

The U.S. Capitol Police chief and the acting attorney general released statements saying they are investigating the events, and neither statement mentioned antifa. Acting Homeland Security Secretary Chad Wolf said, “We now see some supporters of the President using violence as a means to achieve political ends. This is unacceptable.”

On Jan. 7, FBI assistant director Steven D’Antuono said in a press briefing that the agency has “no indication” that antifa played a role in the riot.

Several social media posts claimed that specific people were really with antifa, using photos and screenshots. But these cases were disproven by PolitiFact and other fact-checkers.

One man is actually a known Qanon supporter, who backs Trump and is referred to as the “Q Shaman” He wears face paint and a signature horned fur cap, and he had been photographed at other pro-Trump events before he was seen at the Capitol.

Another man accused of being Antifa-aligned was identified by reporters who track extremism as a Neo-Nazi, not an antifa activist.

Several social media posts claimed that specific people were really with antifa, using photos and screenshots. But these cases were disproven by PolitiFact and other fact-checkers.

Paxton shared the rumor that “at least 1 ‘bus load’ of antifa thugs infiltrated peaceful Trump demonstrators.” The rumor appeared to originate with a commentator who cited an anonymous former FBI agent and no other evidence.

A history of blaming antifa

Fact-checkers are accustomed to fact-checking claims about “antifa” that don’t check out.

Antfia activists are predominately made up of communists, socialists, and anarchists who seek to reject white supremacy without help of police. Sometimes its activists use violence. Experts have said the bulk of antifa organizing is nonviolent.

Scrutiny of antifa picked up after groups counter-protested white nationalists in August 2017, during the “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville, Va. After a car plowed into protestors and killed a woman, a false news website claimed, falsely, that an antifa activist was behind the wheel.

Later that year, antifa was wrongly blamed online for several attacks, such as the Las Vegas massacre. More recent claims have blamed antifa for wildfires and violent protests.

When nationwide protests against police brutality turned violent over the summer, Trump blamed antifa for looting businesses and picking fights with police.

Government intelligence reports, media reports, and experts have offered no evidence that antifa played any significant role in violent protests against police brutality.

Later that year, antifa was wrongly blamed online for several attacks, such as the Las Vegas massacre. More recent claims have blamed antifa for wildfires and violent protests.

When nationwide protests against police brutality turned violent over the summer, Trump blamed antifa for looting businesses and picking fights with police.

Government intelligence reports, media reports, and experts have offered no evidence that antifa played any significant role in violent protests against police brutality.

January 8, 2021: The United States District Court for the District of Columbia swore in a Grand Jury. The Indictment was filed on January 11, 2021.

INDICTMENT

The Grand Jury Charges that:

COUNT ONE: On or about January 6, 2021, within the District of Columbia, JACOB ANTHONY CHANSLEY, also known as “Jacob Angeli,” committed and attempted to commit an act to obstruct, impede, and interfere with a law enforcement officer lawfully engaged in the lawful performance of his official duties incident to and during the commission of a civil disorder, and the civil disorder obstructed, delayed, or adversely affected the conduct and performance of a federally protected function.

(Civil Disorder, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 231(a)(3))

COUNT TWO: On or about January 6, 2021, within the District of Columbia, JACOB ANTHONY CHANSLEY, also known as “Jacob Angeli,” attempted to and did corruptly obstruct, influence an official proceeding, that is, a proceeding before Congress by committing an act of civil disorder, and threatening Congressional officials, and unlawfully remaining in a restricted building without lawful authority, and engaging in disorderly and disruptive conduct.

(Obstruction of an Official Proceeding, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1512(c)(2))

COUNT THREE: On or about January 6, 2021, in the District of Columbia, JACOB ANTHONY CHANSLEY, also known as “Jacob Angeli,” did unlawfully and knowingly enter and remain in the United States Capitol, a restricted building, without lawful authority to do so.

(Entering and Remaining in a Restricted Building, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1752(a)(1))

COUNT FOUR: On or about January 6, 2021, in the District of Columbia, JACOB ANTHONY CHANSLEY, also known as “Jacob Angeli,” did knowingly, and with intent to impede and disrupt the orderly conduct of Government business and official functions, engages in disorderly and disruptive conduct in and within such proximity to, the United States Capitol, a restricted building, when and so that such conduct did in fact impede the orderly conduct of Government business and official functions, by forcing his way inside the United States Capitol and traversing the United States Capitol Grounds in an effort to prevent the Electoral College votes from being certified.

(Disorderly and Disruptive Conduct in a Restricted Building, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1752(a)(2))

COUNT FIVE: On or about January 6, 2021, in the District of Columbia, JACOB ANTHONY CHANSLEY, also known as “Jacob Angeli,” willfully and knowingly entered or remained on the floor of a House of Congress or in any cloakroom or lobby adjacent to that floor, without authorization to do so.

(Violent Entry and Disorderly Conduct in a Capitol Building, in violation of Title 40. United States Code, Section 5104(e)(2)(A))

COUNT SIX: On or about January 6, 2021, in the District of Columbia, JACOB ANTHONY CHANSLEY, also known as “Jacob Angeli,” willfully and knowingly paraded, demonstrated and picketed in a Capitol Building.

(Parading, Demonstrating, or Picketing in a Capitol Building, in violation of Title 40, United States Code, Section 5104(e)(2)(G)).

January 9, 2021: The U.S. Department of Justice “Three Men Charged in Connection with Events at U.S. Capitol On Wednesday, Jan. 6, 2021”

Three men were charged today in federal court in the District of Columbia in connection with the riots at the U.S. Capitol on Wednesday, Jan. 6, 2021.

Jacob Anthony Chansley, a.k.a. Jake Angeli, of Arizona, was charged with knowingly entering or remaining in any restricted building or grounds without lawful authority, and with violent entry and disorderly conduct on Capitol grounds. Chansley was taken into custody today.

It is alleged that Chansley was identified as the man seen in media coverage who entered the Capitol building dressed in horns, a bearskin headdress, red, white and blue face paint, shirtless, and tan pants. This individual carried a spear, approximately 6 feet in length, with an American flag tied just below the blade..

January 9, 2021: Newsweek posted “Jake Angeli, Shirtless Horned-Hat Rioter, Tells FBI He Joined The Capitol Riot ‘at the request of the President”.

The shirtless rioter who was pictured storming the U.S. Capitol in an outfit of horns and fur has told the FBI that he came to Washington D.C. on Wednesday “at the request of the President.”

Jake Angeli, 32, of Arizona, whose real name is Jacob Anthony Chansley, was arrested on Saturday and charged with “knowingly entering or remaining in any restricted building or grounds without lawful authority, and with violent entry and disorderly conduct on the Capitol grounds, according to the Department of Justice.

A Capitol Police arrest affidavit shows that Chansley called into the Washington Field Office for the FBI on January 7, one day after the riots, and “voluntarily” confirmed to officials that he was the “male in face paint and headdress in the Vice President’s chair in the Senate.”

Chansley, who was among the mob that broke into the Capitol as lawmaker met to formally certify President-elect Joe Biden’s 2020 presidential election win, said he “came as part of a group effort, with other ‘patriots’ from Arizona, at the request of the President,” according to the document.

Newsweek reached out to the White House for comment.

Chansley became a prominent figure of the incident after he was pictured inside the chambers shirtless, wearing horns with face paint featuring colors of the American flag, and covered in tattoos. He is now facing federal charges in relation to the incident.

After police secured the building and removed the rioters, several President Donald Trump loyalists began pushing a false narrative claiming that the Capitol had been breached by members of Antifa. “Some of the people who breached the Capitol today were not Trump supporters,” GOP Congressman Matt Gaetz of Florida said on the House floor. “They were masquerading as Trump supporters and in fact were members of the violent terrorist group Antifa.”

Chansley took to Twitter and insisted that he was not part of the Black Lives Matter or Antifa movements. “I’m a Qanon & digital soldier,” he tweeted. “My name is Jake & I marched with the police & fought against BLM & ANTIFA in PHX.”

NOTE: Wikipedia posted: Antifa is a left-wing anti-fascist and anti-racist political movement in the United States. It consists of a highly decentralized array of autonomous groups that use nonviolent direct action, incivility, or violence to achieve their aims. Antifa political activism includes non-violent methods such as poster and flyer campaigns, mutual aid, speeches, protest marches, and community organizing.

Some who identify as antifa also use tactics involving digital activism, doxing, harassment, physical violence, and property damage. Supporters of the movement aim to combat far-right extremists, including neo-Nazis and white supremacists.

Individuals involved in the movement subscribe to a race of left-wing ideologies, and tend to hold anti-authoritarian, anti-capitalist, and anti-state views. A majority of individuals involved are anarchists, communists, and socialists, although some social democrats also participate in the antifa movement.

The name antifa and the logo with two flags representing anarchism and communism are derived from the German antifa movement. Dartmouth College historian Mark Bray, author of Antifa: The Anti-Fascist Handbook, credits Anti-Racist Action (ARA) as the precursor of modern antifa groups in the United States.

January 11, 2021: AP reported: “Arizona man charged in Capitol riot appears in court”

An Arizona man who took part in the insurrection at the U.S. Capitol while sporting face paint, no shirt and a furry hat with horns made his first court appearance Monday.

A judge scheduled a detention hearing Friday for Jake Chansley, who has been jailed on misdemeanor charges since surrendering to authorities over the weekend in Phoenix. He took part in the hearing by phone from a detention facility.

The FBI identified Chansley from images taken during the riot showing his distinctive sleeve tattoos. Chansley was inside the Capitol and on the Senate dais as he carried a U.S. flag on a pole topped with a spear.

He hasn’t yet entered a plea of charges of entering a restricted building without lawful authority, violent entry and disorderly conduct on Capitol Grounds.

His court-appointed attorney, Gerald Williams, told the judge that Chansely has been unable to eat sine he was arrested Saturday. He said his client has a restricted diet, though it was unclear to Williams whether Chansley’s food issues were related to health concerns or religions reasons.

The judge ordered Williams to work with the U.S Marshals Service to address the issue.

Chansley’s mother, Martha Chansley, told reporters outside the courthouse that her son needs an organic diet, The Arizona Republic reported.

“He gets very sick if he doesn’t eat organic food, she said. “He needs to eat.”

Williams didn’t immediately return a call seeking comment from The Associated Press.

Chansley is among at least 90 people who have been arrested on charges stemming from Wednesday’s siege on the Capitol.

It is alleged that Chansley was identified as the man seen in media coverage who entered the Capitol building dressed in horns, a bearskin headdress, red, white and blue face paint, shirtless, and tan pants. This individual carried a spear, approximately 6 feet in length with an American flag tied just below the blade.

His court-appointed attorney, Gerald Williams, told the judge that Chansley has been unable to eat since he was arrested Saturday. He said his client has a restricted diet, though it was unclear to Williams whether Chansley’s food issues were related to health concerns or religious reasons.

The judge ordered Williams to work with the U.S. Marshals Service to address the issue.

Williams didn’t immediately return a call seeking comment from The Associated Press.

Chansley is among at least 90 people who have been arrested on charges stemming from Wednesday’s siege on the Capitol.

An investigator said in court records that Chansley called the FBI in Washington the day after the riot, telling investigators that he came to the nation’s capital “at the request of the president that all ‘patriots’ come to D.C. on January 6, 2021.”

Chansley has long been a fixture at Trump rallies. He also attended a November rally of Trump supporters protesting election results outside of an election office in Phoenix, holding up a sign that read, “HOLD THE LINE PATRIOTS GOD WINS.”

Rioters violently clashed with officers as they forced their way in the Capitol to try to stop Congress from certifying President-elect Joe Biden’s victory.

A police officer who was hit in the head with a fire extinguisher later died, and a woman was fatally shot by an officer as she tried climbing through a broken window of a barricaded doorway inside the Capitol. Three others died in medical emergencies.

January 15, 2021: CNBC “QAnon ‘shaman’ Jacob Chansley held without bail after storming Senate during Capitol riot by Trump supporters” It was written by Dan Mangan.

A self-described QAnon shaman was ordered held without bail Friday by a judge after prosecutors presented evidence he stormed into the Senate and left a menacing note for Vice President Mike Pence during a riot by pro-Trump supporters.

Jacob Chansley, the horn-wearing, spear-wielding, face-paint wearing conspiracy theorist drew widespread attention Jan. 6 for his bizarre appearance among the mob that invaded the Capitol complex.

Before Friday’s detention hearing in U.S. District Court in Phoenix, federal prosecutors in Arizona said there is “strong evidence, including Chansley’s own words and actions at the Capitol, supports that the intent of the Capitol rioters was to capture and assassinate elected officials in the United States government.”

Those prosecutors dropped that claim at the bail hearing, after pushback from the top federal prosecutor in Washington, D.C., whose office lodged the two felonies and four misdemeanors that led to Chansley’s arrest.

Arizona federal prosecutors had also noted that filing that “news reports suggest that the U.S. Capitol siege may just be the beginning of potentially violent actions from President [Donald] Trump’s supporters.”

The filing by the office of Arizona U.S. Attorney Michael Bailey asked a judge on Friday to detain Chansley, one of the most notorious rioters arrested so far, without bail.

They said he has planned to return to Washington for President-elect Joe Biden’s inauguration next week.

“Chansley is a self-proclaimed leader of the QAnon,” a group of conspiracy theorists that believes that many U.S. lawmakers are part of a ring of child molesters and Satan worshipers, filing said. There were other believers in QAnon among the rioters.

“Chansley is an active participant in — and has made himself the most prominent symbol of — a violent insurrection that attempted to overthrow the United States government,” prosecutors wrote. “No [bail] conditions can reasonably assure his appearance [in court] as required, nor ensure the safety of the community.”

But Michael Sherwin, the acting U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, during a press conference later Friday undercut the idea that there is evidence of assassination plots by the rioters.

“Right now, we don’t have direct evidence of kill-capture teams,” said Sherwin, whose office is one that has lodged criminal charges against Chansley and other rioters.

Sherwin said, “there may be a disconnect” between his office and those of federal prosecutors in Arizona and Texas, who have made similar allegations.

Later Friday, at Chansley’s hearing in Phoenix, an assistant U.S. attorney asked the judge to remove the sentence in the bail filing that claimed there was strong evidence of an intent to capture and killed elected officials.

While that statement “may very well be appropriate at a trial of Mr. Chansley and may very well characterize the evidence and his intent that day,” the prosecutor said that for the purpose of the bail hearing, “we do not want to mislead the court by discussing the strength of any sort of specific evidence.”

The bail filing also said that Chansley, who was wearing face paint and a hat with horns on it, raced up to a dais in the Senate “where Vice President Pence had been presiding just minutes before, and began posing” to be photographed by other rioters.

Pence was presiding that day over a joint session of Congress to formally confirm the election of Biden as president.

“Chansley left a note on the Senate Chamber dais, where Vice President Mike Pence had been presiding over the session just minutes before, warning “it’s only a matter of time, justice is coming.”

Prosecutors said that when the FBI questioned Chansley about the meaning of his words, he “went on a lengthy diatribe describing current and past United States political leaders as infiltrators, specifically naming Vice President Mike Pence.”

“He said that he was able to get into the Untied States Senate in D.C. “by the grace of God.” Chansley said that he was glad he sat in the Vice President’s chair because Vice President Pence is a child-trafficking traitor,” the filing said.

While Chansley, who is also known as Jacob Angeli, claimed that he did not mean the note as a threat, “the Government strongly disagrees,” the filing said.

Prosecutors noted that “Chansley also expressed his interest in returning to Washington D.C. for the inauguration, later telling the FBI: ‘I’ll still go, you better believe it.”

“For sure, I’d want to be there, as a protester, as a protester, f— a,” he said, according to the filing.

In an interview last week with the FBI, prosecutors wrote, he twice said “that he had plans after January 9 FBI interview to drive to the Arizona State Capitol.”

“Corroborating his statement, Chansley had his horns, furry coyote tail headdress, face paint, tan pants, six-foot-long spear, and his bullhorn inside the 2003 Hyundai that he parked at the FBI,” the filing said.

The document said Chansley lied to federal pre-trial services investigators after his arrest when he said he never used drugs other than marijuana, which he smokes three times weekly in the past.

“Chansley has described his routine use of psychedelic drugs, including mushrooms and peyote, in recorded interview on his podcasts,” the filing said. “Additionally, a full portrait of Chansley’s apparent mental health issues — which he has publicly-disseminated, and which include strongly-held false mystical beliefs and leadership in a dangerous extremist group, QAnon founded on an imaginary conspiracy theory — were not provides to the PTS officer, and thus not evaluated in the assessment.”

In a video interview outside the Capitol as he and other rioters left the complex, Chansley said that he left the Senate floor and “the cops just walked out with me.”

He also said the mob was leaving because Trump had posted a message online asking them to do so, and that rioters had “won” the day.

“We won by sending a message to the senators and the congressmen, we won by sending a message to Pence, that if they don’t … do as it is their oath to do, that if they don’t uphold the Constitution, then we will remove you, but one way or the other,” Chansley said.

ProPublica reported last month two women warned Capitol Police about Chansley, whom they had seen outside the building “strangely dressed” and “carrying a spear.”

“He was a figure they would come to recognize — Jacob Chansley, the QAnon follower in a Viking outfit who was photographed last week shouting from the dais of the Senate chamber,” ProPublica reported about the women, Melissa Byrne and Chibundu Nnake.

“They alerted the Capitol Police at the time, as the spear seemed to violate the complex’s weapons ban, but officers dismissed their concern, they said,” according to ProPublica.

“One officer told them that Chansley had been stopped earlier in the day, but that police ‘higher ups’ had decided not to do anything about him.”

“We don’t perceive it as a weapon,” Nnake recalled the officer saying of the spear,” the article said.

Byrne tweeted Friday, writing, “I am exceedingly livid that I reported this a—– to the USPS on 12/14 for carrying a weapon on Capitol Grounds and was told “higher ups” okay’d him being there. I am seething. Imagine if he would have been arrested and investigated.”

Sen. Ben Sass, R-Neb, who has been one of Trump’s most vocal critics in his own party, said in a statement on Friday, “Rage-peddlers are going to try to whitewash the attack on the Capitol, saying that a few bad apples got out of control. That’s wrong … These men weren’t drunks who go rowdy — they were terrorists attacking this country’s constitutionally-mandated transfer of power. They failed, but they came dangerously close to starting a bloody constitutional crisis.”

Trump was impeached Wednesday by the House of Representatives for inciting the mob, which stormed the Capitol complex after a rally on the Ellipse, in which he urged supporters to help him undo Biden’s election.

Also Friday, the New York Times reported that the FBI is investigating 37 people in a probe of the killing during the riot of Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknck.

The Times cited an FBI memo sent to the private sector and others.

Four other people died during the riot, including an Air Force veteran who subscribed to QAnono theory who was shot while trying to climb through a broken window in the House of Representatives.

January 29, 2021: CNN Politics reported: “QAnon Shaman’ Jacob Chansley pleads guilty to felony US Capitol riot” It was written by Marshall Cohen.

The so-called “QAnon Shaman’ who stormed the US Capitol in a horned bearskin outfit pleaded guilty Friday to a felony for obstructing the Electoral College proceedings in January 6.

The defendant Jacob Chansley of Arizona, is a well-known figure on the QAnon movement. He went viral after the January 6 attack because of the bizarre outfit he wore while rummaging through the Capitol. He made his way to the Senate dais that was hastily vacated earlier by Vice President Mike Pence — someone Chansley falsely claimed was a “child-trafficking traitor.”

He pleaded guilty Friday during a virtual hearing in DC District Court. The guilty plea was made as part of a deal with prosecutors, and it was accepted by District Judge Royce Lamberth.

The case has seen plenty of twists and turns: Chansley went on a hunger strike in February as part of a successful bid to get organic food in jail. He gave a jailhouse interview in March that was later rebuked by the judge in his case. And his attorney insulted people with disabilities in May, in what he said was a ploy to draw attention to mental health issues in the legal system.

Chansley was originally charged with six federal crimes. He pleaded guilty to one of the most serious charges and could face a maximum of 20 years in prison, though his lack of a criminal record means he’ll likely receive much less. As part of the plea agreement, Chansley agreed to pay $2,000 in restitution for damage to the Capitol. He could also face a fine of up to $250,000.

During the plea hearing, Chansley’s attorney asked yet again for his client to be released before sentencing. The Justice Department opposed this request, and Lamberth said he will issue a decision soon. When he is sentenced, Chansley will get credit for time already served in jail.

Sentencing was scheduled for November 17. As part of the plea deal, prosecutors agreed to seek a punishment between roughly three and four years in prison. This is the same potential prison term that other Capitol rioters who pleaded guilty to a single felony charge are facing.

He has been in jail since his arrest in January, and his attorney argued for his release on a few occasions. But the judge overseeing the case repeatedly ruled that Chansley is too dangerous to set free — making Chansley part of a small group of rioters who aren’t accused of attacking anyone that day, but have been detained before trial because of the potential for future violence.

The case highlighted how some Trump supporters are now facing real-world consequences by believing in fantastical conspiracy theories. Chansley’s support for QAnon inspired his presence at the Capitol on January 6, which landed him in jail for the previous eight months. His lawyer now ays Chansley is “seeking … to step away and distance himself from the Q vortex.”

Mental health has been a major part of Chansley’s criminal case. He underwent a court-ordered psychological evaluation earlier this year, and his lawyer has argued that the government was making his pre-existing mental health conditions worse by keeping him behind bars before trial.

“He is a man with mental health vulnerability who has, for eight months, been in what any doctor is the worst thing you can possibly have done to you if you have a personality disorder, which is be placed in solitary confinement,” defense attorney Al Watkins said during Friday’s hearing.

Chansley answered procedural questions during the hearing and spoke briefly about the mental health evaluation. Lambeth ruled that Chansley was competent to plead guilty.

“I am very appreciative for the court’s willingness to have me in my mental vulnerabilities examined, as well as I hope that your honor certainly didn’t take any offense by anything (that) I told the psychiatrist. I certainly didn’t mean anything personal. I just said I hope you were impartial.” Chansley said, prompting Lambeth to reply that he wasn’t offended by the comment.

Overall, at least 600 people have been arrested, and the Justice Department has secured more than 50 guilty pleas.

February 4, 2021: The Associated Press reported: “Man who wore horns in US Capitol riot moved to Virginia Jail. It was written by Michael Balsamo.

A man who stormed the U.S. Capitol while sporting face paint, no shirt and a furry hat with horns was moved to a jail in Virginia on Thursday after a federal judge ordered authorities to provide him with organic food while he’s in custody.

Jacob Chansley was transferred to the Alexandria Detention Center after is attorney argued that his client had gone nine days without eating because organic food wasn’t served at the jail in Washington. A judge ordered corrections officials to provide the special diet.

Chansley lost 20 pounds since being transferred from Arizona to Washington last week, his attorney, Albert Watkins, told the judge. Chansley, who calls himself the “QAnon Shaman,” considers eating organic food to be part of his “shamanistic belief system and way of life,” the lawyer said.

On Thursday, U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth said the U.S. Marshals Service told the court that the District of Columbia Department of Corrections had asked for Chansley to be moved because they couldn’t honor the court’s order to feed him organic food.

The judge said jail officials in nearby Alexandria could accommodate the special diet.

Chansley was indicted on civil disorder, obstruction, disorderly conduct and other charges for his role in the riot at the Capitol on Jan. 6. He was among a group of hundreds of pro-Trump supporters who charged past outnumbered police officers and stormed the Capitol as Congress was meeting to vote to certify Joe Biden’s electoral win.

The FBI identified Chansley from images taken during the riot that showed his distinctive tattoos. Chansley was inside the Capitol and on the Senate dais as he carried a U.S. flag on a pole topped with a Speer. Authorities said he also wrote a threatening note to then-Vice President Mike Pence.

March 8, 2021: Hon. Royce C. Lamberth, United States District Judge for the District of Columbia released a Memorandum Opinion regarding Jacob Chansley.

After defendant Jacob Anthony Chansley was arrested on charges stemming from his participation in the January 6, 2021 breach of the United States Capitol, a magistrate judge in the District of Arizona ordered him detained pending trial. Defendant now asks this Court to vacate the magistrate judge’s order of detention and release him as he awaits trial. After the government filed its opposition, and defendant replied, the Court held a hearing on defendant’s motion.

Upon consideration for the parties’ filings, the arguments set forth at the hearing, and the underlying record, the Court finds that no condition or combination of conditions of release will reasonably assure defendant’s appearance as required or the safety of others and the community. Accordingly, the Court will DENY defendant’s motion to revoke the magistrate judge’s order of detention.

BACKGROUND

A. Factual Allegations

The government proffers the following evidence in support of its opposition to defendant’s motion for pre-trial release. At approximately 1:00 p.m. on January 6, 2021, a joint session of Congress convened to certify the Electoral College vote count for the 2020 Presidential Election. As elected members of the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives met in separate chambers inside the U.S. Capitol building, a large crowd gathered outside. U.S. Capitol Police Officers, as well as temporary and permanent security barriers, stood between the crowd and the Capitol.

Between 1:00 and 2:00 pm, individuals from the crowd forced their way through the barricades and past Capitol Police officers, advancing to the exterior facade of the Capitol building. As the mob approached the building, the joint session continued inside, with then-Vice President Mike Pence presiding in the Senate Chamber. Despite the efforts of Capitol police officers to prevent the crowd from entering the building, the mob forced its way past the officers and into the Capitol. As the mob broke into the building, Congressional members and Vice President Pence were forced to evacuate.

Defendant was one of the rioters who breached the Capitol building. His actions that day were extensively photographed and recorded. (citing “A Reporter’s Video from Inside the Capitol Siege,” The New Yorker (Jan. 17, 2021). Defendants’s unmistakable outfit included a horned coyote-tail headdress, red, white, and blue face paint; gloves; and no shirt. Defendant carried a six-foot pole with an American flat zip-tied to the shaft and a metal spearhead fixed to the top. He also carried a bullhorn.

As rioters smashed the glass windows of the Capitol building and began climbing inside, defendant entered the building through an adjacent doorway. Once inside, Capitol Police Officer Keith Robishaw attempted to calm the rioters and move people out of the area, but defendant used his bullhorn to encourage the crowd.

Defendant then approached Officer Robishaw and screamed at him that “this was their house” and that “they were there to take the Capitol, and to get Congressional leaders.” When Officer Robishaw and others told the rioters to leave the area from the same way they had entered, most complied. Defendant, however, disobeyed this order and instead began heading up a stairwell toward the Senate Chamber.

Once inside the Senate Chamber, defendant began pounding his spear on the ground and screaming obscenities. Officer Robishaw, now in the Senate Chamber alone with the rioters, asked the defendant to assist them by using his bullhorn to get the rioters out of the Chamber. Instead of cooperating, however, defendant walked up to the Senate dais where Vice President Pence had been preceding minutes before.

Defendant announced that he was going to sit in Vice President Pence’s chair because “Mike Pence is a fucking traitor”. He then asked another rioter to photograph him. While standing at the dais, defendant scrawled a note to Vice President Pence on a piece of paper sitting on the desk, reading, “ITS ONLY A MATTER OF TIME JUSTICE IS COMING!” Defendant then turned to The New Yorker reporter filing inside the Senate Chamber, and repeated his message: “It’s only a matter of time. Justice is coming.”.

After more rioters entered the Chamber, defendant led the crowd in what he described as a “prayer” over his bullhorn. The New Yorker Footage at 8:02. “Thank you for allowing the United States of America to be reborn,” he exclaimed. “Thank you for allowing us to get rid of the communists, the globalists, and the traitors within our government.”

B. Defendant’s Interviews and Arrest

The following day, on January 7, 2021, defendant called the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) Washington field office and asked to speak with law enforcement. Defendant confessed that he was the person photographed standing at Vice President Pence’s seat on the Senate dais, wearing face paint and a horned headdress. He further explained that he entered the Capitol “by the grace of God” and said he was glad he sat in the Vice President’s chair because Vice President Pence is a child-trafficking traitor.

Defendant stated that he did not intend for his note to Vice President Pence to be understood as a threat. But he expressed his interest in returning to Washington, D.C. for the 46th Presidential Inauguration, telling the FBI: “I’ll still go, you better believe it. For sure I’d want to be there, as a protestor, as a protestor, fuckin’ a.”… Later that day, in an interview with NBC News, defendant boasted about his involvement in the events on January 6th, saying “[t]he fact that we had a bunch of traitors in office hunker down, put on their gas masks and retreat into their underground bunker, I consider that a win.”

On January 8, 2021, the government initiated this criminal matter by filing a sealed Complaint in this District. The Complaint charged defendant with knowingly entering or remaining in any restricted building or grounds without lawful authority in violation of 18 U.S.C. 5104(c)(2)(A) and (G). The same day, U.S. Magistrate Judge G. Michael Harvey issued a warrant for defendant’s arrest.

The next day, January 9, 2021, defendant drove to the FBI field office in Phoenix, Arizona to speak with authorities again. At this point, defendant had not yet learned of the warrant for his arrest or the criminal Complaint, as both documents were sealed. During that second interview, defendant twice told law enforcement that he had plans to drive to the Arizona State Capitol. Corroborating those plans, law enforcement found the horned headdress, face paint, six-foot spear, and bullhorn in defendant’s car, which was parked outside the FBI field office. Defendant was then arrested at the Phoenix FBI office.

C. Procedural History

On January 11, 2021, defendant was indicted in this District. ECF No. 3. The Indictment charges defendant with civil disorder in violation of 18 U.S.C. 231(a)(3) and obstructing an official proceeding in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1512(c)(2), both of which are felonies. It also charges defendant with four misdemeanors: entering and remaining in a restricted building, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1752(a)(1), disorderly conduct in a Capitol building in violation of 40 U.S.C. 5104(e)(2)(G).

The same day he was indicted, defendant had an initial appearance before U.S. Magistrate Judge Deborah M. Fine in the District of Arizona. The government sought defendant’s pre-trial detention and, on January 15, 2021, Magistrate Judge Fine held a detention hearing. United States v. Chansley.

After hearing from both sides, the magistrate judge found that no condition or combination of conditions would reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required or the safety of others and the community. Accordingly, she ordered defendant detained pending trial.

In support of the order of detention, Magistrate Judge Fine found:

Despite Mr. Chansley’s voluntary communications with federal investigators, the evidence before the Court confirms Mr. Chansley’s motivations and capabilities to participate in similar unlawful acts while in pretrial release.

Mr. Chansley broke through barricades, unlawfully entered the Capitol Building, disobeyed police orders to leave, refused a police request to quell the crowd using his bullhorn, and instead ran up onto the dais where Vice President Pence had been presiding just minutes before and scrawled a threatening note.

Mr. Chansley’s willingness to very publicly attempt to obstruct the official duties of the United States Congress certifying the vote count of the Electoral College make clear his disregard for the importance of following orders during official proceedings such as the D.C. District Court case now charging him with serious crimes. Further, on Twitter, in late November

After defendant Jacob Anthony Chansley was arrested on charges stemming from his participation in the January 6, 2021 breach of the United States Capitol, a magistrate judge in the District of Arizona ordered him detained pending trial. Defendant now asks this Court to vacate the magistrate judge’s order of detention and release him as he awaits trial. After the government filed its opposition, and the defendant replied, the Court held a hearing

After hearing argument from both sides, the magistrate judge found that no condition of or combination of conditions would reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required or the safety of others and the community. Accordingly, she ordered defendant detained pending trial.

“Despite Mr. Chansley’s voluntary communications with federal investigators, the evidence before the Court confirms Mr. Chansley’s motivations and capabilities to participate in similar unlawful acts while on pretrial release. Mr. Chansley broke through barricades, unlawfully entered the Capitol Building, disobeyed police orders to leave, refused a police request to quell the crowd using his bullhorn, and instead ran up onto the dais where Vice President Pence had been presiding just minutes before and scrawled a threatening note.

Mr. Chansley’s willingness to very publicly attempt to obstruct the official duties of the Unite States Congress certifying the vote count of the Electoral College makes clear his disregard for the importance of following orders during official proceedings such as the D.C. District Court case now charging him with serious crimes.

Further, on Twitter in late November 2020, Mr. Chansley had previously promoted identifying and then hanging those he believes to be traitors within the United States government.

After defendant was transferred to the District of Columbia Central Detention Facility (“D.C. jail”), he submitted an inmate request form for a religious dietary accommodation based on his shamanistic faith. He explained that he eats only organic food because of his faith.

Defendant refused to eat the food given to him while his request was pending, and the D.C. jail eventually denied his request. After one week without food, defendant filed an “emergency motion for sustenance or, in the alternative, for pretrial release.”

The government opposed defendant’s request for pre-trial release but took no position on his request for organic food. After holding a hearing, the Court granted defendant’s motion for a religious dietary accommodation, finding that the D.C. jail’s refusal to accommodate defendants’s sincerely held religious beliefs violated the First Amendment.

Because the defendant withdrew his alternative request for pre-trial release, the Court did not rule on it. The next day, the D.C. jail represented that it was unable to comply with the Court’s Order, so the U.S. Marshal transferred defendant to the Alexandria Detention Facility in Virginia.

Now, one month later, defendant agains seeks pre-trial release. He argues that after Magistrate Judge Fine ordered him detained, “significant developments have occurred and a number of significant acts have come to light, all of which ” now make pre-trial release appropriate.

Those developments, he argues include the fact that President Biden was inaugurated and the fact that the COVID-19 pandemic has made it difficult for defense counsel and defendant to have unmonitored communications. Alternatively, defendant asks to be temporarily released pursuant to 18. USC. 3142(i) for the “compelling” reasons that his faith precludes him from receiving a COVID-19 vaccination and that the pandemic has made it “impossible” for defense counsel and defendant to speak privately.

The government opposes defendant’s request for pre-trial release. It incorporates the arguments raised in his opposition, to defendant’s “emergency motion for sustenance or, in the alternative, for pretrial release,” and it proffers details of the events on January 6th from video captured inside the Capitol and published by The New Yorker.

After defendant replied, the Court held a hearing on defendant’s motion. During the hearing, defense counsel represented that defendant was welcomed into the Capitol by police officers. To refute this claim, the government referenced video footage of defendant that was in the government’s possession but had not yet been disclosed to defendant. Accordingly, at the Court’s direction, the government disclosed the video footage to defendant and the Court.

Also during the hearing, the government referenced an interview given by defendant and defense counsel to 60 Minutes+, which aired on March 4, 2021. The government provides the link to that interview in its Sur-reply. Defendant’s motion is now ripe for consideration.

II LEGAL STANDARDS

A. Pre-Trial Detention Under the Bail Reform Act

The Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. 3141, authorizes the detention of defendants awaiting trial on a federal offense only under certain, limited circumstances. 18 U.S.C. 3141(f). First, the government may seek a defendant’s pre-trial detention if charged offenses fall into any of five enumerated categories. 3141(f)(1). Those categories include:

(A) a crime of violence, a violation of section 1591, or an offense listed in section 2332b(g)(5)(B) for which a maximum term of imprisonment of 10 years or more is prescribed.

(B) an offense for which the maximum sentence is life imprisonment or death,

(C) and offense for which a maximum term of imprisonment of ten years or more is prescribed in the Controlled Substances Act … the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act … or [46 U.S. C 705]

(D) any felony if [the person charged] has been convicted of two or more offenses described in [3143(f)(1)(A)-(C)], or two or more State or local offenses that would have been offenses described in [3124(f)(1)(A)-(C)] if a circumstance giving rise to federal jurisdiction had existed, or a combination of such offenses, or

(E) any felony that is not otherwise a crime of violence that involves a minor victim or that involves the possession or use of a firearm or destructive device … or any other dangerous weapon. 18 U.S.C. 3142(f)(1)(A)-(E).

Second, the government may also seek detention — or the court may sua sponte hold a detention hearing to determine whether pre-trial detention is appropriate — if the case involves “a serious risk” that the defendant will flee or “will attempt to obstruct justice, or threaten, injure, or intimidate, or attempt to threaten, injure, or intimidate a prospective witness or juror.”

If the Bail Reform Act authorizes pre-trial detention, the judicial officer must hold a hearing to determine whether there are conditions of release that would reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and the safety of any other person and the community.

If the judicial officer finds that “no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the appearance of the person as required and the safety of any other person and the community,” the judicial officer shall order the person detained pending trial.

A finding that no condition or combination of conditions would reasonably assure the safety of any other person and the community must be supported by clear and convincing evidence. And a finding that no conditions would reasonably assure the defendant’s appearance is as required must be supported by a preponderance of the evidence.

In two situations, the Bail Reform Act establishes a rebuttable presumption that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the safety of any other person and the community.

First, a rebuttable presumption arises if the judicial officer finds that (a) the person has been convicted of certain listed federal offenses, including a “crime of violence,” or similar state offenses, (b) that offense was committed while the person was on release pending trial for another offense, (c) not more than five years have elapsed since the date of conviction of that offense or the release from imprisonment, whichever is the latter.

A rebuttable presumption also arises if the judicial officer finds probable cause to believe that the person committed any of five categories of enumerated offenses.

If the case does not involve either of those circumstances, there is no rebuttable presumption of detention and the court instead must consider the following factors to determine whether there are conditions that would reasonably assure the defendant’s appearance and the public’s safety:

(1) the nature and circumstances of the offense charged, including whether the offense is a crime of violence, a violation of Section 1591, a Federal crime of terrorism, or involves a minor victim or a controlled substance, firearm, explosive or destructive device.

(2) the weight of the evidence against the person

(3) the history and characteristics of the person, including —

(A) the person’s character, physical and mental condition, family ties, employment, financial resources, length of residence in the community, community ties, past conduct, history relating to drug or alcohol abuse, criminal history, and record concerning appearance at court proceedings.

(B) whether, at the time of the current offense of arrest, the person was on probation, on parole, or on other release pending trial, sentencing, appeal, or completion of the sentence for an offense under Federal, state, or local law; and

(4) the nature and seriousness of the danger to any person or the community that would be posed by the person’s release.

B. Review of a Magistrate Judge’s Order of Detention Under 18 U.S.C. 3145(b)

If a magistrate judge orders a defendant detained, the defendant “may file, with the court having original jurisdiction over the offense, a motion for revocation or amendment of the order.” The motion shall be decided promptly. The court having original jurisdiction of the offense reviews the magistrate judge’s order of detention de novo as to issues of both law and fact.

C. Temporary Release under 18 U.S.C. 3142(i)

In addition to seeking review of a detention order by the court having original jurisdiction of the offense, the Bali Reform Act also allows defendants ordered detained to move for temporary release under 18 U.S.C. 3142(i).

Section 3142 provides that after a judicial officer enters an order of detention, the officer “may by subsequent order, permit the temporary release of the [defendant], in the custody of a United States marshal or another appropriate person, to the extent that the judicial officer determines such release to be necessary for preparation for the person’s defense or for another compelling reason. A defendant moving under 3142(i) bears the burden of showing that he is entailed to relief.

Before the COVID-19 pandemic, few courts had considered what amounts to “another compelling reason” necessitating release, as motions brought under 3142(i) typically sought temporary release for the defendant’s preparation of his defense.

More recently, however, courts have confronted the argument that temporary release under 3142(i) is necessary due to the conditions in detention facilities caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. And while some courts have granted temporary release under 3142(i) when the defendant has serious underlying health condition that exacerbate the risk of severe illness or death from COVID-19, courts recognize that the existence of COVID-19 alone does not present a “compelling reason” necessitating temporary release.

III DISCUSSION

A. The Bail Reform Act Authorizes Defendant’s Pre-Trial Detention

As a threshold matter, the Court must first determine whether the Bail Reform Act allows the government to seek pre-trial detention. The government argues that defendant is subject to pre-trial detention under 3142(f)(1)(E) because he carried a dangerous weapon (a six-foot spear) during the commission of the crimes charged.

In response, defendant argues that he did not carry a “dangerous weapon” into the Capitol because the object he carried was not a six-foot “spear” but rather a “flagpole” with “a spear finial.” The spear finial, he notes is the “traditional Native American design.”

The Court agrees with the government that defendant is subject to pre-trial detention under 3142(f)(1)(E). Section 3142(f)(1)(E) allows the government to seek pre-trial detention in cases involving “any felony that is not otherwise a crime of violence that involves a minor victim or that involves the possession or use of a firearm or destructive device … or any other dangerous weapon.”

Defendant was charged with two felonies: civil disorder in violation of 18 U.S.C. 231(a)(3) and obstruction of an official proceeding in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1752(a)(1). As both parties agree, neither of these felonies is a “crime of violence” as defined by the Bail Reform Act.

The only issue to be decided, then is whether a six-foot pole with a metal spearhead fixed to the top constitutes “any other dangerous weapon.” The Bail Reform Act does not define the term “dangerous weapon,” nor is the Court aware of any case in this Circuit or any other that defines “dangerous weapon” as used in the Bail Reform Act.

The same term is, however, used in functionally analogous contexts elsewhere in Title 18 of the U.S. Code, such as the federal assault statutes: 18 U.S.C. 111 and 113. Section 111(b) criminalizes assault of a federal officer using a “deadly or dangerous weapon.” 18 U.S.C. 111(b) and Section 113(a)(3) punishes assault “with a dangerous weapon” when committed within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the Untied States.

As used in Sections 111 and 113, courts have consistently defined “dangerous weapon” as an object that is either inherently dangerous or is used in a way that is likely to endanger life or inflict great bodily harm. “Inherently dangerous” weapons are those are “obviously dangerous” such as “guns, knives, and the like. Conversely, “objets that have perfectly peaceful purposes may be turned into dangerous weapons” when used in a manner likely to cause bodily harm.

Under this definition, the Court finds that a six-foot pole with a metal spearhead fixed the top is, undoubtedly, a dangerous weapon. Like a knife, it is inherently dangerous. Both objects have a sharpened point designed to inflict harm by piercing or punching. Moreover, a spear can inflict those puncturing and stabbing would at a distance, making it even more effective as an offensive weapon than a knife.

Thus, because defendant’s six-foot spear is inherently dangerous, it does not matter whether defendant actually used it to cause bodily harm while inside the Capitol.

B. The Court Finds, by Clear and Convincing Evidence, that No Condition or Combination of Conditions Will Reasonably Assure the Safety of Other Persons and the Community

The Bail Reform Act does not establish a rebuttable presumption of detention in this case. Accordingly, to determine whether any condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the safety of others and the community, the Court must consider available information concerning four subjects set forth in 18 U.S.C. 3142(g).

Those subjects include the nature and circumstances of the offenses charged, the weight of the evidence against defendant, defendant’s history and characteristics, and the nature and seriousness of the danger to any person in he community that would be posed by defendant’s release…

Defendant’s Statements and Actions on January 6th Show That He Will Not Comply With Court-Ordered Conditions of Release.

Not only do the circumstances of the crimes charged indicate that defendant poses a risk to public safety, but defendant’s actions also show that he will not comply with Court-ordered conditions of release. Defendant’s conduct inside the Capitol building on January 6th demonstrates his willingness to openly and publicly flout orders from law enfacement.

When Officer Robishaw attempted to calm the crowd inside the Capitol building, defendant used his bullhorn to encourage other rioters. And when Office Robishaw asked the rioters leave the building, defendant disobeyed this order and instead headed up a stairwell toward the Senate Chamber.

Once inside the Senate Chamber, defendant refused to cooperate when Officer Robishaw asked to use his bullhorn to get the rioters out of the Chamber. Based on his conduct, the Court has no faith that defendant would comply with conditions of release, such as a curfew or an ankle monitor…

C. The Court Finds, by a Preponderance of the Evidence, that No Condition or Combination of Conditions Will Reasonably Assure Defendant’s Appearance as Required

Next, the Court must determine whether any condition or combination of conditions would reasonably assure defendant’s appearance as required. Again, the Court must consider the circumstances set forth in 3142(g) to make this finding.

Based on the gravity of the conduct leading to the crimes charged, the weight of evidence against defendant, defendant’s ties to the group “QAnon,” and the lack of an appropriate custodian, the Court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that no conditions of release would mitigate the risk of flight…

September 3, 2021: U.S. Department of Justice posted “Arizona Man Pleads Guilty to Felony Charge In Jan. 6 Capitol Breach”.

Jacob Anthony Chansley, a.k.a. Jake Angeli, 34. of Phoenix, Arizona, pleaded guilty today to obstruction of an official proceeding, a felony, for his role in the crimes related to the breach of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, which disrupted a joint session of the U.S. Congress that was in the process of ascertaining and counting the electoral votes related to the presidential election.

Chansley faces a statutory maximum of 20 years in prison, as well as a supervised release. The Honorable Royce C. Lamberth, who accepted the guilty plea, scheduled sentencing for Nov. 17., 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

According to court papers filed today, on the afternoon of Jan. 6, Chansley was among the crowd that passed the police line at the West Front of the U.S. Capitol. He was shirtless, wearing a Viking hat with fur and horns, wearing red, white and blue face paint, and carying an American flag tide to a pole with a sharp object at the tip and a bullhorn.

He and others in the crowd passed police lines and entered the scaffolding erected in advance of the Inauguration on top of the staircase heading up to the Lower West Terrace of the building. They then entered the Upper West Terrace at approximately 2:10 p.m., as the certification proceedins were still under way. Chansley continued into the building through a broken door at approximately 2:14 p.m., one of the first 30 rioters to get inside.

Chansley continued moving, reaching the Galery of the Senate and then the Senate floor. He then scaled the Senate dais, taking the seat that Vice President Mike Pence had occupied an hour earlier.

He proceeded to take pictures of himself on the dais and refused to vacate the seat when asked to do so by law enforcement. Instead, Chansley stated that “Mike Pence is a f—ing traitor” and wrote a note on available paper on the dais, stating “It’s Only A Matter of Time. Justice is Coming!” He further called other rioters up to the dias and led them in an incantation over his bullhorm. He was cleared from the Chamber at approximately 3:09 p.m.

Chansley was arrested Jan. 9 and has been in custody ever since.

The case is being prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia and the Department of Justice National Security Division’s Counterterrorism Section. Valuable assistance was provided by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Arizona. It is being investigated by the FBI’s Washington Field Office with assistance from the U.S. Capitol Police, Metropolitan Police Department (MPD), and the FBI’s Phoenix Field Office.

In the seven months since Jan. 6, more than 570 individuals have been arrested in nearly all 50 states for crimes related to the breach of the U.S. Capitol, including over 170 individuals charged with assaulting or impeding law enforcement. The investigation remains ongoing.

November 17, 2021, USA TODAY posted “Jake Angeli, aka QAnon shaman, sentenced to 41 months in Jan 6 Capitol riot”. It was written by Richard Ruelas.

Jake Angeli, the Phoenix man who joined the riot of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6 with his face painted and his head topped with a fur hat with horns was sentenced on Wednesday to 41 months in prison.

Given the 11 months he has already served since his January arrest, Angeli will serve about 2 1/2 more years in a federal prison. The judge said he expected it would be a minimum security unit.

Before the judge passed the sentence, Angeli addressed the court for about 30 minutes and accepted responsibility for his crime. But said he was not a danger to society.

“I may be guilty of this crime, absolutely,” he said. “But I am in no way, shape or form a dangerous criminal. I’m not a domestic terrorist. I’m not an insurrectionist. I’m a good man who broke the law.”

Angeli said he asked himself how Jesus Christ or Mahatma Gandhi would act and decided that Jesus would respect and understand his captors and that Ghandi would accept responsibility.”

“The hardest part of all of this is, I know I am to blame,” Angeli told the court. “Most people will never have any idea to know what it’s like to look in the mirror and say, you know, you really messed up.

Judge Royce Lamberth told Angeli that he thought he had genuine remorse, but could not justify deviating down from the sentencing guidelines for the felony crime.

“Although you have evolved in your thinking… what you did here was horrific,” the judge told him.

Angeli, 34, was not accused of any violence nor property damage during his time in the U.S. Capitol, but prosecutors said Angeli played a key role by goading on the crowd through shouts blasted from his megaphone.

Angeli also took the dais of the U.S. Senate, which had been hurriedly cleared moments earlier, and left a note for then-Vice President Mike Pence that warned him: “Its only a matter of time. Justice is coming!”

Speaking to Lamberth on Wednesday, Assistant U.S. Attorney Kimberly Paschall said that note was particularly chilling because Angeli was not writing that from his Phoenix home, but while in D.C., while Pence was close by.

Paschall said Angeli’s actions have been descried by himself and others as peaceful. But she showed videos to the court that showed Angeli entering the building and shouting an obscenity in the Senate Chamber.

“This is not peaceful. That is chaos,” she said. “That is not peaceful. That is criminal obstruction.”

Angeli, who was charged under his legal name, Jacob Chansley, had pleaded guilty to a single felony count of obstructing a civil proceeding.

The government had asked that Angeli be sentenced to 51 months. Angelis’s lawyer, Albert Watkins, asked that his client be freed, arguing that the 11 months he has already spent in solitary confinement was punishment enough.

In court on Wednesday, Watkins said the sentencing provided a unique opportunity for the judge to both “mete out justice” and to “bridge this great divide” in the country’s political climate.

Lawyer says Angeli did it for Trump

Watkins has argued that Angeli thought he was acting at the behest of then-President Donald Trump who had requested his supporter show up to D.C. on Jan. 6, the day a joint session of Congress would certify that President Joe Biden defeated Trump in the 2020 general election.

“He was not an organizer,” Watkins wrote of Angeli. “He was not a planner. He was not violent. He was not destructive. He was not a thief.”

Watkins has also, in interviews and in court briefs, discussed the mental deficiencies of his client. He has described Angeli’s life as being filled with abuse and neglect. In his filing, to the court ahead of Angeli’s sentencing, Watkins said Angeli found the supportive community he had long craved among followers of Trump.

Watkins said that Angeli’s mental health has deteriorated in custody, where he has been kept in isolation due to restrictions around the COVID-19 pandemic.

“He suffers from severe anxiety, panic attacks, and a constant feeling of claustrophobia while he is locked along in his cell each day.” Watkins wrote.

In court filings, his attorney said that a military mental health examination for Angeli, who had served in the Navy, found he suffered from a personality disorder, but was deemed he was fit to serve. The Navy did not tell Angeli he had the disorder, which his attorney named as schizotypal personality disorder.

Watkins, in court Wednesday, said that since learning of his diagnosis, Angeli had become a “new man.”

A history of protests, conspiracy theories

Angeli had become a fixture at protests and marches throughout Phoenix area since at least 2019.

He originally painted his face black and white, but switched to red, white and blue during the 2020 election year.

Angeli would parade around shirtless, showing off a chest decorated with elaborate tattoos, each a symbol of his shamanistic beliefs, he said.

He donned a fur helmet with tails that draped his face and was topped with horns.

Angeli also carried a six-foot spear that had a real tip. Though, his attorney said in court filings, that it was not secure property and would fall off it tilted too far.

In interviews with the Republic, Angeli said he intentionally picked his outfit as a way to draw attention to himself and the message he would shout in a booming voice that resonated even without amplification.

He often carried a sign that said “Q Sent Me,” showing his fealty to the QAnon movement.

Angeli had at the ready, a well-rehearsed answer should someone ask who Q was.

“Q is the highest level in the military and the intelligence community,” he would say in a rapid-fire response.

Q was “disseminating above top secret information to patriots in the republic like myself and the people in the Q movement to take back our country from evil globalists and communists,” he would say, not pausing for breath, “who are attempting to monopolize all of the resources and all of the labor in our country and all over the world so they can create a new world order, one world government.”

Angeli self studied as a shaman, giving himself the name Yellowstone Wolf. He offered lessons for $55.55 in topics such as spiritual self defense through his virtual Starseed Academy. It provided what he said was his only, if spotty, income.

Cooperating with the FBI

Angeli drove to Washington, D.C. with others from Phoenix. He has not said who he traveled with, but his attorney said that Angeli had been cooperating with authorities investigating the Capitol insurrection.

He was one of the first people into the U.S. Capitol, prosecutors said, entering through a door that security camera footage showed had been busted open from the inside by rioters who had entered the building through smashed windows.

Prosecutors said that based on an analysis if video footage that Angeli was in the Capitol building for about an hour.

His final stop was the U.S. Senate Chamber.

Angeli gave an interview to NBC News the next day, while traveling back to Arizona, and downplayed hi actions. “I walked through an open door, dude,” he said. Although he said he did feel a sense of accomplishment for making members of Congress run for cover.

Angeli’s image was one of the first distributed by authorities hoping to identify him, with his costume earning him a nickname in the national media: The QAnon shaman. Aware he was being sought, Angeli contacted the FBI and arranged to go to the Phoenix office upon his return of what he thought would be a follow-up interview.

He was arrested when he showed up and has been in custody ever since.

Agents searching his car found the fur hat with horns and spear inside.

Angeli had planned, after the meeting with the FBI, to drive to the Arizona State Capitol and start another one of his signature protests.


The Lectern Guy

January 9, 2021: Department of Justice U.S. Attorney’s Office District of Columbia reported “Three Men Charged in Connection with Events at U.S. Capitol”

Three men were charged today in federal court in the District of Columbia in connection with the riots at the U.S. Capitol on Wednesday, Jan. 6, 2021.

Adam Johnson, 36, of Florida, was charged with one count of knowingly entering or remaining in any restricted building or grounds without lawful authority; one count of theft of government property; and one count of violent entry and disorderly conduct on Capitol grounds. Johnson was arrested yesterday and is currently in custody.

It is alleged that on Jan. 6, 2021, Johnson illegally entered the United States Capitol and removed the Speaker of the House’s lectern from where it had been stored on the House side of the Capitol building. A search of open sources led law enforcement to Johnson, who is allegedly seen in a widely circulated photo inside the Capitol carrying the lectern.

January 11, 2021: The Tampa Bay Times reported “Florida man accused in Capitol lectern theft allowed to go free on bond”

Adam Christian Johnson, the Parrish man who became one of the most prominent symbols of the riots that engulfed the U.S. Capitol last week when he was photographed carrying a lectern from the House of Representatives, was released Monday in Tampa.

Johnson, a 36-year-old father of five boys, appeared in a Tampa federal courtroom Monday afternoon. After the proceeding, Johnson signed a $25,000 signature bond to secure his release. He will not have to pay any money unless he fails to appear in court.

Johnson strolled out of the Sam M. Gibbons U.S. Courthouse shortly before 4 p.m., wearing a white T-shirt, flip-flops, and shorts.

His lawyers said he had received death threats since the Jan 6. riot.

“He’d like to just get home to his family,” said his attorney, David Bigney.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Christopher Tuite ordered that Johnson is to be restricted from traveling outside the Middle District of Florida while the case against him is pending. He can travel to Washington, D.C., only for court appearances.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Patrick Scruggs told the judge that the government could not demonstrate that Johnson poses a risk of fleeing. But he asked that Johnson not be subject to restrictions while on release, including drug testing, the surrender of his passport and a nightly curfew from 9.p.m. to 6 a.m.

“This is a serious case,” Scruggs told the judge. “Everyone involved in the storming of the Capitol lst week needs to be held accountable for their actions, including Mr. Johnson.”

Johnson, flanked by Orlando attorneys Bigney and Dan Eckhart, sat quietly at a defense table, saying little other than to answer standard questions about whether he understood his rights.

His next court date is set for Jan. 19 in the nation’s capital. The inauguration of President-elect Biden is scheduled to occur the following day.

Scruggs expressed concern that Johnson would attend the event, emphasizing that he is to travel only for court purposes.

“I can assure you he is not going to be attending the inauguration,” Eckhart said.

The case against Johnson will be handled in Washington, D.C., but the judge explained that he has the right to have the case transferred to Tampa. Such a transfer, though, would require him to plead guilty, and would only occur with the consent of the U.S. Attorneys.

Speaking with reporters after the hearing, Eckhart acknowledged that the widely-seen image of his client inside the Capitol is problematic for the defense.

“I don’t know how else to explain that, but yeah, that would be a problem,” Eckhart said. “I’m not a magician, and neither is Mr. Bigney. We’ve got a photograph of our client in what appears to be inside the federal building, inside the Capitol, with government property.”

Johnson had been held in the Pinellas County Jail since his arrest Saturday on a federal warrant. He faces three charges: entering or remaining in a restricted building without lawful authority, theft of government property, and violent entry and disorderly conduct on Capitol grounds.

He is one of dozens of people nationwide who have been arrested in the days following the violent insurrection against America’s legislative branch of government.

Drawn to the nation’s capital in protest of the 2020 election results, the mob in support of outgoing President Donald Trump overwhelmed Capitol police, smashed windows, rampaged through hallways and congressional offices, and swarmed the Senate floor. Five people, including a police officer, died in the melee.

Amid the riot, Johnson’s image became iconic. A photograph appeared to show him strolling through the Capitol rotunda flashing a broad smile and waving his left hand as his right arm lugs the lectern, which bears the seal of the Speaker of the House of Representatives. A famous oil painting, “Surrender of General Burgyone,” can be seen behind him, along with an American flag. In the picture, Johnson wears a knitted cap with the name “Trump.”

The lectern was later found undamaged inside the Capitol.

As the image circulated widely on social media, someone who knew him notified the FBI that he was a resident of Manatee County

January 12, 2021: The Hill reported “Man seen carrying Pelosi’s lectern during Capitol riot released on $25K bail. By John Bowden.

The man seen in a now-viral image carrying away Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s (D-Calif.) lectern during Wednesday’s deadly riot at the Capitol was released Monday on $25,000 bail.

An attorney for Johnson addressed reporters at a press conference Monday afternoon and seemingly admitted that his client was the man in the photo carrying stolen property.

“You have a photograph of our client in a building, unauthorized to be there,” said Dan Eckart. “I’m not a magician… So, yeah, we’ve got a photograph of our client, what appears to be inside a federal building, … with U.S. property.”

Here’s Eckhart’s comment on vid: “Johnson was released from federal court in #Tampa today on a $25K bond. He surrendered his passport and submitted to wearing a tether. A prelim hearing is set for Jan 19 in DC, the day before Biden’s inauguration. @10TampaBay pic.twitter.com/4EXZSuknkv

A statement from the U.S. attorney’s office indicated that the widely shared photo showing Johnson carrying Pelosi’s lectern led them to him. He faces charges of stealing government property, violent entry and entering a government building without permission.

According to CBS Atlanta, Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s lectern has a market value of about $1,000. Adam Johnson was charged with one count of knowingly entering or remaining in any restricted building or grounds without lawful authority. He is also charged with one count of theft of government property, which is a felony. He was also charged with one count of violent entry and disorderly conduct on capital grounds.

“It is alleged that on Jan, 6, 2021, Johnson illegally entered the United States Capitol and removed the Speaker of the House’s lectern from where it had been stored on the House side of the Capitol building,” prosecutors said, according to WTSP. “A search of open sources led law enforcement to Johnson, who is allegedly seen in a widely circulated photo inside the Capitol carrying the lectern.”

— Josh Sidorowicz WTSP (@JoshWTSP) January 11, 2021.

Dozens of people have been charted over their alleged involvement in Wednesday’s riot, which left five dead, including one Capitol Police officer. Lawmakers, staffers and reporters were forced to hide in secure areas for hours while mobs ransacked the building and battled with law enforcement.

January 28, 2021: Tampa Bay Times reported: “Florida man accused in Capitol lectern theft allowed to go free on bond” It was written by Dan Sullivan.

Adam Christian Johnson, the Parrish man who became one of the most prominent symbols of the riots that engulfed the U.S. Capitol last week when he was photographed carrying a lectern from the House of Representatives, was released Monday in Tampa.

Johnson, a 36-year-old father of five boys, appeared in a Tampa federal courtroom Monday afternoon. After the preceding, Johnson signed a $25,000 signature bond to secure his release. He will not have to pay any money unless he fails to appear in court.

Johnson strolled out of the Sam. M. Gibbons U.S. Courthouse shortly before 4 p.m., wearing a white T-shirt, flip-flops, and shorts.

His lawyers said he has received death threats since the Jan. 6 riot.

“He’d just like to get home to his family,” said his attorney, David Bigney.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Christopher Tuite ordered that Johnson is to be restricted from traveling outside the Middle District of Florida while the case against him is pending. He can travel to Washington, D.C., only for court appearances.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Patrick Scruggs told the judge that the government could not demonstrate that Johnson poses a risk of fleeing. But he asked that Johnson be subject to restrictions while on release, including drug testing, the surrender of his passport and a nightly curfew from 9 p.m. to 6 a.m.

“This is a serious case,” Scruggs told the judge. “Everyone involved in the storming of the Capitol last week needs to be held accountable for their actions, including Mr. Johnson.”

Johnson, flanked by Orlando attorneys Bigney and Dan Eckhart, sat quietly at a defense table, saying little other than to answer standard questions about whether he understood his rights.

His next court date is set for Jan. 19 in the nation’s capital. The inauguration of President-elect Joe Biden is scheduled to occur the following day.

Scruggs expressed concern that Johnson would attend the event, emphasizing that he is to travel only for court purposes.

“I can assure you he is not going to be attending the inauguration,” Echkart said.

The case against Johnson will be handled in Washington, D.C., but the judge explained that he has the right to have the case transferred to Tampa. Such a transfer, though, would require him to plead guilty, and would only occur with the consent of the U.S. Attorneys.

Speaking with reporters after the hearing, Eckhart acknowledged that the widely-seen image of his client inside the Capitol is problematic for the defense.

“I don’t know how else to explain that, but yeah, that would be a problem,” Eckhart said. “I’m not a magician, and neither is Mr. Bigney. We’ve got a photograph of our client in what appears to be inside the federal building, inside the Capitol, with government property.”

Johnson had been held in the Pinellas County Jail since his arrest Saturday on a federal warrant. He faces three charges: entering or remaining in a restricted building without lawful authority, theft of government property, and violent entry and disorderly conduct on Capitol grounds.

He is one of dozens of people nationwide who have been arrested in the days following the violent insurrection agains America’s legislative branch of government.

Drawn to the nation’s capital in protest of the 2020 election results, the mob in support of outgoing President Donald Trump overwhelmed the Capitol police, smashed windows, rampaged through hallways and congressional offices, and swarmed the Senate floor. Five people, including a police officer, died in the melee.

Amid the riot, Johnson’s image became iconic. A photograph appeared to show him strolling through the Capitol rotunda flashing a broad smile and waving his left hand as his right arm lugs the lectern, which bears the seal of the Speaker of the House of Representatives. A famous oil painting, “Surrender of General Burgoyne,” can be seen behind him, along with an American flag. In the picture, Johnson wears a knitted cap with the name “Trump.”

The lectern was later found undamaged inside the Capitol.

As the image circulated widely on social media, someone who knew him notified the FBI that he was a resident of Manatee County.

November 22, 2021: WTSP reported ‘Lectern guy’ pleads guilty to entering the US Capitol during Jan. 6 insurrection” It was written by Katie Jones.

Adam Johnson, the man seen carrying House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s lectern during the Jan. 6 U.S. Capitol riot has pleaded guilty to entering and remaining in a restricted building or grounds.

Johnson had also been charged with theft of government property and violent entry and disorderly conduct on the Capitol grounds. Both of those charges have been dismissed.

The Capitol rioter was caught smiling and waiving the camera while carrying the lectern inside the Capitol building. The photo, captured by Getty Images photographer Win McNamee, was one of the many that went viral during the insurrection of the Capitol by supporters of former President Donald Trump.

The lectern and a gavel that was reported missing were recovered undamaged, according to The Washington Post, citing a spokesperson for the Committee on House Administration.

Johnson was jailed on Jan. 8 on a federal warrant in Pinellas County following the riot. At the time, one of Johnson’s lawyers told reporters outside the Tampa courthouse there has been “a lot of judgment” against Johnson based on the photograph, including death threats to him and his family.

A second lawyer for Johnson, Dan Eckhart, acknowledged that the photograph of their client may have presented a problem defending him in court.

“I don’t know how else to explain that, but yeah, we have a photograph of our client, who appears to be in a federal building or inside the Capitol with government property, Eckhart said.

Johnson’s sentencing hearing is set for February 25, 2022. He could face up to six months in prison and a fine of up to $9,500.

February 25, 2022: BBC reported “US Capitol riot ‘podium guy’ Adam Johnson gets 75 days in prison”

A Florida resident photographed during the Capitol riots with a podium bearing the Speake of the House seal has been sentenced to 75 days in prison.

Adam Johnson, 37, dubbed “Podium Guy” by social media users in the wake of the riot, was also fined $5,000 (£3,725).

In November, Johnson pleaded guilty to entering and remaining in a restricted building.

In November, Johnson pleaded guilty to entering and remaining in a restricted building.

Judge Reggie Walton questioned how he could be “a good role model” to his five children”, according to NBC News.

He said Johnson made “a mockery” of the day’s events, which he likened to those seen in a “banana republic.”

“We’re on a dangerous slide in America,” the judge warned.

Johnson had travelled to Washington D.C. from Tampa, Florida on 5 January, a day before the riot.

He was photographed carrying he lectern used by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and posing in front of a painting depicting the surrender of British General John Burgoyne in the American Revolutionary War.

According to court documents, he believed the podium “would make a good prop for a picture.”

Johnson also admitted he told other rioters that a nearby bust of George Washington would make for “a great battering ram” if needed.

He is said to have spent about half an hour inside the building.

Johnson later deleted his Facebook account as well as photos and videos from inside the building.

Days after the breach, he was charged with trespassing, disorderly conduct and theft of government property. Some of those charges against him were dropped late last year by prosecutors in exchange for his guilty plea.

The stay-at-home father has said he “deeply regrets his participation” in the Capitol breach.

He told the court on Friday that he had no intent to harm Speaker Pelosi that day.

“If I did find her, I would ask for a selfie with her, if anything,” he said, according to US media.

More than 740 people have been arrested since the attack last year. Most have been charged with misdemeanors but at least 40 have received prison sentences.


The “Baked Alaska” Guy

January 6, 2021, The New York Times posted: “Pro-Trump Mob Livestreamed Its Rampage, and Made Money Doing It”. It was written by Kellen Browing and Taylor Lorenz.

When the white nationalist Tim Gionet stormed the U.S. Capitol with a mob of Trump loyalists on Wednesday, entering congressional offices and putting his feet up on lawmakers’ furniture, he also chatted live with more than 16,000 of his fans.

Using a livestreaming site called Dlive, Mr. Gionet — known by the online alias “Baked Alaska” — broadcast his actions inside the Capitol. Through Dlive, his fans then sent him messages telling him where to go to avoid capture by the police. They also tipped him with “lemons,” a Dlive currency that can be converted into real money, through which Mr. Gionet made more than $2,000 on Wednesday, according to online estimates.

Mr. Gionet operates one of at least nine channels that used Dlive to share real-time footage from the front lines of Wednesday’s rampage. He and hundreds of other members of the far right have turned to the platform after mainstream services removed them. In 2017, Mr. Gionet was kicked off Twitter; last year, he was barred from YouTube…

January 7, 2021: The Department of Justice posted a STATEMENT OF FACTS

Your affiant is a Special Agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and have been so employed since 2019. Prior to being employed with the FBI, your affiant was a Special Agent with the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) from 2016-2019 and a Police Officer with the Kissimmee Police Department (KPD) from 2010-2016.

During that time, I have investigated kidnappings, homicides, bank robberies, Felon in Possession violations, Domestic Terrorism investigations, and threat-to-life violations. I have prepared and assisted in the preparation of court orders and search warrant applications.

Additionally, during the course of these and other investigations, I have conducted or participated in physical and electronic surveillance, assisted in the execution of search and arrest warrants, debriefed informants, interviewed witnesses and suspects, and reviewed other pertinent records.

Through my training, education, and expertise, I have become familiar with the efforts of persons involved in criminal activity to avoid detection by law enforcement. I am assisting in the investigation and prosecution of events which occurred at the United States Capitol on January 6, 2020.

On January 6, 2021, a joint session of the United States Congress convened at the United States Capitol, which is located at First Street, SE, in Washington, D.C. During the joint session, elected members of the United States House of Representative and the United States Senate were meeting in separate chambers of the United States Capitol to certify the vote count of the Electoral College of the 2020 Presidential Election, which had taken place on November 3, 2020.

The joint session began at approximately 1:00 p.m. Shortly thereafter, by approximately 1:30 p.m, the House and Senate adjourned to separate chambers to resolve a particular objection. Vice President Mike Pence was present and presiding, first in the joint session, and then in the Senate Chamber.

With the joint session underway and with Vice President Mike Pence presiding, a large crowd gathered outside the U.S. Capitol. Temporary and permanent barricades surround the exterior of the U.S. Capitol building, and U.S. Capitol Police were present and attempting to keep the crowd away from the Capitol building and the proceedings underway inside.

At approximately 2:00 p.m, certain individuals in the crowd forced their way through, up, and over the barricades and officers of the U.S Capitol Police, and the crowd advanced to the exterior façade of the building.

At such time, the joint session was still underway and the U.S. Capitol Police attempted to maintain order and keep the crowd from entering the Capitol; including by breaking windows. Shortly thereafter, at approximately 2:20 p.m. members of the House of Representatives and United States Senate, — evacuating the chambers. Accordingly, the joint session of the United States Congress was effectively suspended until shortly after 8:00 p.m. Vice President Pence remained in the United States Capitol from the time he was evacuated from the Senate Chamber until the session resumed.

Based on information I have reviewed, I estimate that between 2:00 p.m., and no later than 4:00 p.m., Anthime Joseph Gionet, also known as “Baked Alaska” on social media platforms entered the United States Capitol without authorization to do so. While inside the Capitol Building, the defendant conducted an approximately 27-minute long livestream video on the “DLive” platform, noting that he was “documenting” the event. The video was later captured and posted to YouTube and Twitter, where your affiant viewed it.

At the 7:06 mark on the YouTube video the defendant approaches an exterior window and is offered a hand to exit the Capitol building. The defendant remarks “I’m staying” and remains in the building. At approximately the 9:40 mark in the YouTube video the defendant can be heard remarking “We are in the Capitol Building, 1776 will commence again.” At approximately the 12:40 mark in the YouTube video the defendant can be heard remarking “Unleash the Kraken, let’s go.” The defendant is repeatedly heard encouraging other protestors not to leave.

At the 15:54 mark in the YouTube video the defendant enters an office in the Capitol and interviews others. At approximately the 17:45 mark on the YouTube video the defendant picks up a telephone and acts out a purported phone call with the United States Senate personnel.

In the video, the defendant and the individuals he is with can be seen in the United States Capitol Building and can be heard chanting, “Patriots are in control,” “whose house? Our house,” and “traitors, traitors, traitors….”

At approximately the 18:05 mark in the YouTube video the defendant shouts, “America First is inevitable. Fuck Globalists, let’s go!” At approximately the 21:10 mark in the YouTube video the defendant remarks “Occupy the Capitol let’s go. We ain’t leaving this bitch.” At approximately the 19:00 mark in the YouTube video the defendant enters another office. The defendant sits on a couch and places his feet on a table. The defendant encourages others not to break anything.

At approximately the 25:26 mark in the YouTube video law enforcement officers ask the defendant to move, at which time, he identifies himself to them as a member of the “media,” and asks where he should go. At approximately the 26:35 mark in the YouTube video the defendant audibly accuses law enforcement of shoving him; no shoving can be seen on the video. He remarks to the law enforcement officer, “You’re a fucking oathbreaker you piece of shit,” “fuck you” approximately four times, and, “you broke your oath to the constitution.” The defendant exits the Capitol at approximately the 26:55 mark on the YouTube video.

Based on the foregoing, your affiant submits that there is probable cause to believe that the Anthime Joseph Gionet violated 18 U.S.C. § 1752(a)(1), which makes it a crime to knowingly enter or remain in any restricted building or grounds without lawful authority to do so.

Based on the foregoing, your affiant submits that there is also probable cause to believe that Anthime Joseph Gionet violated 40 U.S.C. § 5104(e)(2), which makes it a crime for an individual or group of individuals to willfully and knowingly (D) utter loud, threatening, or abusive language, or engage in disorderly or disruptive conduct, at any place in the Grounds or in any of the Capitol Buildings with the intent to impede, disrupt, or disturb the orderly conduct of a session of Congress or either House of Congress, or the orderly conduct in that building of a hearing before, or any deliberations of, a committee of Congress or either House of Congress; (E) obstruct, or impede passage through or within, the Grounds or any of the Capitol Buildings; (F) engage in an act of physical violence in the Grounds or any of the Capitol Buildings; or (G) parade, demonstrate, or picket in any of the Capitol Buildings.

The defendant can be heard remarking, “1776 baby,” “I won’t leave guys, don’t worry.” At the 2:52 minute mark in the YouTube video the defendant, who is livestreaming the event from his device, turns the phone around to show his face and is clearly identifiable. The defendant is a known social media personality and is thus recognizable.

January 10, 2023: Far-right influencer known as ‘Baked Alaska’ sentenced over Capitol attack (The Guardian) It was written by Martin Pengelly.

Anthime Gionet, a far-right social media personality known to this followers as Baked Alaska, was sentenced on Tuesday for two months in prison for his participation in the U.S. Capitol attack – participation he live-streamed.

In court in Washington D.C., the US district judge Trevor McFadden told Gionet, 35: “You did everything you could do to publicize your misconduct. You were there encouraging and participating fully in what was going on.”

Gionet did not address the court.

On 6 January, 2021, rioters breached the Capitol in service of Donald Trump’s attempt to overturn the 2020 election via the lie that Joe Biden’s win was the result of electoral fraud.

Gionet broadcast to around 16,000 followers from locations including the office of Jeff Merkley, a Democratic senator from Oregon. Pretending to report a “fraudulent election,” Gionet said; “We need to get our boy, Donald J Trump, into office.”

According to court documents, Gionet also told rioters: “Come in, let’s go, come on in, make yourself at home” and changed “Patriots are in control!” and “Whose house? Our house!”

His attorney Zachary Thornley, argued that Gionet “never crossed the line from being a protestor to a rioter” and was instead “sort of a guerrilla journalist” who was “there to document. That’s what he does.”

Before becoming a star of far-right social media, Gionet worked for website BuzzFeed.

Last July, however, he pleaded guilty to parading, demonstrating or picketing inside a Capitol building.

Gionet has had other brushes with the law. After clashes in Arizona in late 2020, he was sentenced to 30 days in jail for misdemeanor convictions and fined for damaging a Hanukkah display at the state capitol.

For his participation in the Capitol riot, prosecutors recommended 75 days incarceration and three years probation. Judge McFadden, a Trump appointee who took over the case before sentencing, handed down 60 days and two years probations.

Also imposing a $2,000 fine and $500 in restitution, McFadden said that for Gionet, the January riot was the “culmination of a petty crime spree.”

Gionet spoke to reporters outside the court, saying his sentence was a “win” and adding that he planned to use his time in jail to write a book.

“I have grown immense amounts,” he said. “But I still hold firm that I was there because I believe the election was fraudulent, and I believe people should have a right to speak freely as long as they are being peaceful.”

More than 900 people have been charged with federal crimes related to January 6. Nearly 500 have pleaded guilty. More than 350 have been sentenced.

The House select committee which investigated the riot recommended Trump face criminal charges. An investigation by the Department of Justice continues.

January 10, 2023: RollingStone reported ‘Baked Alaska’ Sentenced to 2 Months After Live-streaming Himself Rioting On Jan. 6″ It was written by Nikki McCann Ramirez

Far-right streamer Anthime Gionet, known online as “Baked Alaska,” has been sentenced to 60 days in prison after pleading guilty in July to having unlawfully protested inside the Capitol during the insurrection on Jan. 6., 2021. Gionet livestreamed almost 30 minutes of his participating in the riot, a decision which not only provided law enforcement with significant evidence placing him at the scene, but aided in identifying other protestors.

In addition to his prison sentence, Gionet has also been ordered to pay $2,500 in fines and restitution.

During the Capitol riot, Gionet touted his location to the camera and made comments to viewers in and the crowd, “Occupy the Capitol, let’s go. We ain’t leaving this bitch.” Gionet called a police officer a “fucking oathbreaker” and a “piece of shit.” He was arrested shortly after.

“You livestreamed your criminal content to thousands of followers hoping they would pay you for your actions,” District Judge Trevor McFadden told Gionet in his address to the court during sentencing. “You did everything you could to publicize your misconduct… You were there encouraging and participating fully in what was going on.”

McFadden described Jan. 6 as the “culmination of a petty crime spree” for Gionet, highlighting his criminal history and apparent lack of remorse for his actions. It’s “pretty shocking behavior.”

In May, Gionet came within a hair’s width of botching his best chance to avoid a jury trial — which given the extensive self-documentation of his actions would have likely resulted in a much harsher sentence — by bungling a hearing to enter a plea agreement with the prosecution.

When asked by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan if he was acknowledging his guilt by entering the plea deal, Gionet responded that he “wanted to go to trial, but the prosecutor said if I didn’t go to trial, they’d put a felony on me, so I think this is probably the better route … I believe I am innocent.”

Sullivan initially instructed Gionet to go ahead and “pick a trial date,” explaining that he could not accept the plea agreement if the defendant maintained their innocence and that he could not “force anyone to plead guilty if they’re not guilty.”

Gionet had long attempted to achieve infamy among the far right, transforming a failed attempt at achieving rap stardom into the trollish personality “Baked Alaska.” Throughout the 2016 electoral cycle Gionet was a staunch supporter of then-candidate Donald Trump, regularly appearing at rallies and events promoting his campaign.

The romance between the pro-Trump right and Gionet was short-lived, however, as before Trump’s inauguration, “Alaska” tweeted that the media is “run in majority by Jewish people.” The statements were condemned by factions of the right, and Gionet was pushed further to the fringes.

The charges stemming from his participation in the Capitol riot are only the latest entry in a history of legal troubles for the streamer. On Jan 13, 2021, Gionet was sentence to 30 days in jail after he assaulted a bouncer at an Arizona bar. Gionet skipped out on a pretrial hearing related to the assault in order to travel to D.C. and participate in the riot, leading the judge in the case to revoke his pretrial release and issue a bench warrant for his arrest.

In Nov. 2021, with a conviction already under his belt and a pending trial, Gionet was charged with misdemeanor criminal damage after he allegedly defaced a Hanukkah display while livestreaming. In the stream, Gionet can be heard saying “no more ‘Happy Hanukkah … only ‘Merry Christmas.'”

Gionet was taken into custody following the hearing on Tuesday and will be allowed to remain free until required to report to prison. “I have grown immense amounts,” Gionet told reporters as he left the courthouse. “But I still hold firm that I was there because I believe the election was fraudulent, and I believe people should have a right to speak freely as long as they are being peaceful.”

January 14, 2021: Arizona Central posted: “Warrant issued for arrest of far-right streamer Tim ‘Baked Alaska’ Gionet after he violates release conditions, failed to show in court” It was written by Anne Ryman.

A Scottsdale judge issued a warrant for the arrest Thursday of far-right social media personality Tim “Baked Alaska” Gionet after he said Gionet violated conditions of his release by leaving the state last week to go to Washington, where he apparently livestreamed the U.S. Capitol riot.

Gionet already was facing misdemeanor charges of assault, disorderly conduct and criminal trespass in Scottsdale City Court after police allege he refused to leave a Scottsdale bar and then pepper sprayed an employee. He had been released in that case with the agreement he not leave the state without the court’s permission.

Judge James Blake was not pleased that the 33-year-old Gionet chose to skip his court hearing without explanation, and even Gionet’s attorney, Zach Thornley, was unable to reach his client on the phone during the court hearing.

Blake set bond at $3,000, saying the $25,000 requested by prosecutors was too high.

Scottsdale prosecutors sought to revoke Gionet’s release after he livestreamed last week from Washington, D.C., where he was seen interviewing random people on the street the night before the U.S. Capitol riot. The next day, he livestreamed from inside the historic building as thousands of people overran Capitol Hill land drove lawmakers into hiding.

Scottsdale Assistant City Prosecutor Joshua Austin, in a petition “without written permission from the Court” and for “failing to remain law abiding.” In the filing, Austin asked the court to issue a summons ordering Gionet to appear in court.

Gionet’s attorney objected to having only a few days’ notice of the court hearing. He said the verbal instructions given his client after his arrest made no mention of him not leaving the state. He said his client has no prior criminal history and called the prosecution’s request for $25,000 bond “outrageous.”

Judge Blake said the release documents that Gionet signed after his arrest, however, outlined that he was not allowed to leave the state without court permission.

The 33-year-old, whose full name is Anthime Joseph Gionet, is known for his extreme, over-the-top internet stunts. He showed up without a mask in October inside a Flagstaff business and livestreamed reactions. His antics have increasingly led him to being banned from social media platforms.

Gionet’s livestreaming last week from the nation’s capital brought him a fresh round of publicity, including a critical account in The New York Times by a former co-worker at BuzzFeed, a news and entertainment website. The Times column described it a “the story of a man being rewarded for being a violent white nationalist, and getting the attention and affirmation that he’s apparently desperate for.”

Gionet’s name does not appear among those who have been arrested or indicted on criminal charges so far related to the Capitol riot.

January 16, 2021: BuzzFeed News reported “Far-Right Troll “Baked Alaska” Has Been Arrested Over The Coup Attempt At The Capitol”. It was written by Julia Reinstein.

Far-right internet troll Tim Gionet, better known as Baked Alaska, was arrested for his role in the deadly insurrection at the U.S. Capitol.

Gionet was arrested by the FBI in charges of “knowingly entering or remaining in any restricted building or grounds without lawful authority” and “violent entry and disorderly conduct on Capitol grounds,” a criminal complaint obtained by BuzzFeed News shows.

Gionet (who briefly worked for BuzzFeed years ago) live-streamed the Jan. 6 attack on Congress on DLive, a streaming platform popular with right-wing extremists, and at one point, turned the camera to show his face.

“We are in the Capitol Building, 1776 will commence again,” he said in video, the court documents state.

Despite participating in the coup attempt — including shouting anti-semetic and QAnon dog whistles, and encouraging others to remain in the building — he at one point identified himself as a member of the media to responding police officers and asked them where he should go. He then accused one of the officers of shoving him, through “no shoving can be seen in the video,” the records state.

On Thursday, a Scottsdale judge issued a warrant for his arrest due to Gionet allegedly violating the terms of his release by leaving the state to go to the Capitol riot, according to AZ Central.

“You’re a fucking oathbreaker you piece of shit,” Gionet then said to an officer.

Court documents also state that Gionet said on camera, “Occupy the Capitol lets’s go. We ain’t leaving this bitch.”

His livestream may be the reason many of the Capitol rioters have been and will be discovered by law enforcement, Vice reported. The FBI is using Gionet’s video to help identify the people who were there and has asked the public to assist in tracking them down.

Thanks to a feature on DLive where viewers can “tip” streamers, Gionet could have earned more than $2,000 from the Capitol riot livestream, according to New York Times.

However, DLive has since suspended Gionet’s account, along with several other accounts, and said the platform would be “freezing their earnings and abilities to cash out,” and that “donation[s] and paid subscriptions will be refunded,”

“While we strongly advocate for the empowerment of our content creators, we also have zero tolerance towards any forms of violence and illegal activities,” the company said.

This is not the first time Gionet has been deplatformed from. In 2017, he was permanently banned from Twitter for violating its hateful conduct policy, and he was banned from YouTube in October 2020 for harassing store workers for wearing masks.

He has also been banned from Uber, GoFundMe, Patreon, and PayPal.

Gionet was previously arrested in December for pepper-spraying a bouncer after he got kicked out of a Scottsdale, Arizona bar and refused to leave, the Phoenix New Times reported. He was charged with assault, disorderly conduct, and criminal trespassing for the incident, which he also livestreamed.

On Thursday, a Scottsdale judge issued a warrant for his arrest due to Gionet allegedly violating the terms of his release by leaving the state to go to the Capitol riot, according to AZ Central.

A lawyer representing Gionet in the Scottsdale case did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

January 16, 2021, The Associated Press reported “Far-right personality ‘Baked Alaska’ arrested in riot probe”

Far-right wing media personality Tim Gionet, who calls himself “Baked Alaska,” has been arrested by the FBI for his involvement in the riot at the U.S. Capitol, a law enforcement official told The Associated Press.

Gionet was arrested by federal agents in Houston on Saturday, according to the official, who was not authorized to discuss the matter before the public release of a criminal complaint and spoke on condition of anonymity.

Thousands of supporters of President Donald Trump stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6 as Congress was meeting to vote to affirm President-elect Joe Biden’s electoral win. Five people died in the mayhem.

Gionet faces charges of violent and disorderly conduct on Capitol grounds and knowingly entering a restricted building without lawful authority, according to the Department of Justice.

Court documents don’t list an attorney for Gionet, or say where he is being held. The jail in Harris County, which includes Houston, didn’t immediately reply to phone messages seeking further information.

FBI Special Agent Nicole Miller said in an affidavit filed in the case that Gionet streamed live for about 27 minutes from inside the Capitol and could be heard encouraging other protestors not to leave, cursing and saying “I’m staying,” “1776 baby,” and “I won’t leave, guys, don’t worry.”

She wrote that Gionet entered various offices and when told by law enforcement officers to move, identified himself as a member of the media. Miller wrote that Gionet then asked officer where to go before cursing a law officer while allegedly the officer shoved him, then leaving the building.

Gionet also posted video that showed Trump supporters in “Make American Great Again” and “God Bless Trump” hats milling around inside the Capitol and taking selfies with officers who calmly asked them to leave the premises. The Trump supporters talked among themselves, laughed, and told the officers and each other, “This is only the beginning.”

Law enforcement official across the country have been working to located and arrest suspects who committed federal crimes. So far, they have brought nearly 100 cases in federal court and the District of Columbia Superior Court.

In a 2017 interview with “Business Insider,” Gionet said he was given the nickname “Baked Alaska” because he is from Alaska and that he smoked marijuana at the time.

June 4, 2021: Arizona Republic posted: “Federal judge will allow far-right streamer Tim ‘Baked Alaska’ Gionet to continue livestreaming videos but calls conduct ‘dangerous’. It was written by Anne Ryman.

A federal judge will allow Tim Gionet, the social media personality known as “Baked Alaska,” to continue livestreaming videos as he awaits his trial on federal charges but called recent videos posted on YouTube “inane” and his behavior in them “concerning” and “dangerous.”

United States Magistrate Judge G. Michael Harvey on Friday ordered additional release conditions after prosecutors said the 33-year-old live-streamed recently had three interactions with Valley law enforcement over six days. Harvey ordered him to report any contact he has with law enforcement to the court and prohibited Gionet from having firearms or weapons.

Federal prosecutors have also sought to have Gionet confined to home detention and banned him from posting videos to social media.

A May 26 video on YouTube shows Gionet filming with two friends while riding in a car. He accuses one of attacking him and almost causing the car to crash on the freeway. The video is titled “Baked Alaska calls cops on his best friend (Part 1).”

He tells the Mesa police officers who arrive that his friend assaulted him and slapped him in the face. He debates whether to press charges but decides in the end he’d rather go home.

A second YouTube video, titled, “Baked Alaska calls cops on his best friend (Part 2),” show Gionet driving the two friends home. The friend, accused of assaulting him in the first video, demands he stop filming or he warns, “this is going to get ugly.” Gionet calls the police again and another set of officers arrive.

Prosecutors cited testimony videos as evidence that the federal court should impose stricter release conditions on the 33-year-old Arizona resident, who property records say lives in Queen Creek. They say the footage appears to show Gionet also threatening his friend, which would violate his release conditions.

Harvey, the federal judge, said Friday that Gionet did not violate his release conditions but came close to committing a crime. He called his conduct in the videos “concerning.”

Gionet was essentially baiting his friend, which led the friend to assault Gionet while they were inside a moving car, Harvey said.

“You knew what you were doing, putting the camera in his face,” Harvey said. “That’s dangerous conduct.”

Gionet’s attorney, Zachary Thornley, argued that a probation officer “grossly mischaracterized Mr. Gionet’s actions” in the May 26 videos and that he did not violate release conditions.

Thornley called the request from the probation department for stricter release conditions “asinine.”

He said the video was streamed to bring in revenue as Gionet has done through his long-established career.

“Like mainstream media, creating content is how he makes a living. Often what is streamed is scripted and much like comedy, the creative content cannot be take as real to life in every instance, Thornley wrote in his response to the court.

During Friday’s hearing in federal court, Thornley reiterated Gionet was the one who called police, that his conduct in the videos was not illegal.

“I really don’t know why we’re all here today,” he told the judge in closing.

Harvey responded, “We’ll, we’re all here today because your client recorded it and put it on YouTube.”

Gionet remains out of custody while he faces federal charges alleging he knowingly entered a restricted building without lawful authority and violent entry and disorderly conduct on U.S. Capitol grounds on Jan. 6. More than 400 people face charges related to the riot, which happened as Congress started to count Electoral College votes for the presidential election.

Thousands of supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol building that day, sending lawmakers scrambling for safety. Vice President Mike Pence had to be moved to a secure location.

The federal complaint against Gionet alleges he entered the U.S. Capitol between 2 and 4 p.m. on Jan. 6 and live-streamed video for 27 minutes on the DLive platform. He said he was documenting the event. The video was later posted on YouTube and Twitter, where the FBI viewed it.

The federal complaint alleges Gionet is repeatedly heard encouraging people not to leave. The video shows him entering a congressional office, sitting on a couch and placing his feet on a table.

At one point in the video, the complaint says he curses repeatedly at law enforcement, calling one officer an “oath breaker.”

Gionet’s attorney has argued in court records that Gionet was acting as a member of the press when he entered the U.S. Capitol, and he filmed.

“He did not arrive in Washington DC with an agenda other than to film what was taking place,” Thornley, his attorney, wrote in a response to the court in March.

He said video footage will shown that Gionet did not engage in violence and repeatedly told others not to break or vandalize anything. He said Gionet left the building when he was told to go.

Gionet started out as a rapper and was later a commentator for BuzzFeed, a news and entertainment website, before branching out to become a social-media personality known for live-streaming edgy, aggressive videos.

Originally from Alaska, he explained to Business Insider in 2017 that his catch nickname came about as a way to brand himself. He was working in the entertainment industry, and his boss called him “Alaska.”

“So I came up with ‘Baked Alaska’ because at the time I was a stoner. So I was like the baked kid from Alaska. And it’s also got a double meaning because it’s also a dessert.”

Gionet’s attorney said in court records his client was raised in a Christian family and attended a private Christian school. Until recently, he’s avoided scraps with law enforcement.

Besides the recent federal charges, Gionet has a pending case in Scottsdale City Court. He is accused of pepper spraying a Scottsdale bartender in the face in December and faces misdemeanor charges of assault, criminal trespassing and disorderly conduct. He said he acted in self-defense.

Prosecutors during Friday’s hearing also said Gionet has been banned from a Starbucks in Arizona for one year after he allegedly entered the business and played an offensive song. They did not give out the store’s location.

Gionet tells Mesa police in one of the May 26 videos that he is involved in a pending trial. The police officer asks what jurisdiction.

“D.C. The Capitol thing. Did you see that? I was there,” he says. “So I’m fighting that in court.”

January 19, 2023: Anchorage Daily News reported: “Far-Right web personality ‘Baked Alaska” gets 60 days in jail for role in Capitol riot.

A far-right Internet personality who streamed live video while he stormed the U.S. Capitol was sentenced on Tuesday to two months of imprisonment for joining the mob’s attack on the building.

Anthime Gionet, known as “Baked Alaska” to his social media followers, declined to address the court before U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden sentenced him to 60 days behind bars followed by two years of probation. Gionet had faced a maximum six months of imprisonment.

Gionet incriminated himself and other rioters with the video that he streamed to a live audience of roughly 16,000 followers. The 27-minute video showed him encouraging rioters to stay in the Capitol.

“You did everything you could to publicize your misconduct,” the judge told Gionet. “You were there encouraging and participating fully in what was going on.”

Despite his guilty plea, Gionet said he didn’t think he was breaking the law on Jan. 6 and doesn’t regret being there.

“I have grown immense amounts,” he said outside the courthouse. “But I still hold firm that I was there because I believe the election was fraudulent, and I believe people should have a right to speak freely as long as they are being peaceful.”

Inside an office for Democratic Sen. Jeff Merkley, Gionet filmed himself picking up a telephone and pretending to report “a fraudulent election,” parroting former President Trump’s baseless claim that the 2020 election was stolen from him.

“We need to get our boy, Donald J. Trump, into office,” Gionet aded.

Genet joined others in chanting “Patriots are in control!” and “Whose house? Our house!” Before leaving, he profanely called a Capitol police officer an “oathbreaker.”

Gionet, 35, pleaded guilty in July to a misdemeanor count of parading, demonstrating, or picketing inside a Capitol building.

Prosecutors recommended sentencing Gionet to 75 days of incarceration, three years’ probation and 60 hours of community service.

Gionet worked at BuzzFeed before he used social media video to become an influential figure in far-right political circles. He was scheduled to speak at the white nationalist “Unite the Right” rally in 2017 before it erupted in violence on the streets of Charlottesville, Virginia.

U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan originally was scheduled to sentence Gionet. Sullivan withdrew from Gionet’s case and several others for reasons that aren’t specified in court filings, although he took “senior status” and retired from full-time duty nearly two years ago.

Gionet celebrated online when his case was reassigned to McFadden, a Trump nominee. On a live stream, Gionet praised McFadden as “a very awesome judge who is a pro-trump judge and one of the judges that let one of the guys off innocent in his trial.”

McFadden acquitted a New Mexico man, Matthew Martin, of riot-related charges in April 2022 after hearing trial testimony without a jury. Martin is the only Jan. 6 defendant who has been acquitted of all charges after a trial.

More than 900 people have been charged with federal crimes related to Jan. 6. Nearly 500 of them have pleaded guilty, mostly to misdemeanor offenses, and over 350 of them have been sentenced.

Federal authorities have used Gionet’s video to prosecute other rioters, including three men from New York City. Antonio Ferrigno, Francis Conner and Anton Lunyk pleaded guilty last year and were sentenced to home confinement. Gionet’s livestream shows them in Merkley’s office.

Defense attorney Zachary Thornley argued in a court filing that Gionet “never crossed the line from being a protester to a rioter.” Thornley described his client as “sort of a guerrellia journalist.”

“He was there to document. That’s what he does,” the lawyer told the judge.

Mainstream internet platforms, including Twitter, suspended Gionet’s accounts before Jan. 6. At the Capitol, he was live-streaming video using a fringe service called Live. He told authorities that viewers paid him $2,000 for his livestreams on Jan. 5 and Jan. 6.

Under Elon Musk’s ownership, Twitter has reinstated accounts belonging to Gionet and other far-right figures.

Gionet, who grew up in Anchorage, was arrested in Houston less than two weeks after the riot and jailed for five days. He moved from Arizona to Florida after his release.

McFadden also ordered Gionet to pay a $2,000 fine and $500 in restitution. The judge said the Jan. 6 riot was the “culmination of a pretty crime spree” by Gionet.

Gionet was sentenced to 30 days in jail for misdemeanor convictions stemming from a December 2020 encounter in which authorities say he shot pepper spray at an employee at a bar in Scottsdale, Arizona. Gionet was also convicted of criminal damage charge and fined $300 for damaging a Hanukkah display in December 2020 outside the Arizona Capitol.

McFadden noted that Gionet recorded his crimes to drum up social media followers and money.

“That is a very disturbing vocation, sir,” the judge told him.

“Without him going to prison, he won’t stop what he’s going,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Anthony Franks said.

Gionet initially balked at pleading guilty to the Jan. 6 charge during an earlier hearing. Sullivan refused to accept a guilty plea by Gionet in May after he professed his innocence at the start of what was scheduled to be a plea agreement hearing.

Before Gionet pleaded guilty in July, Thornley told Sullivan that a protester was outside Gionet’s Florida home and recording the virtual hearing over the telephone, a violation of court rules.

“Protesting what? the judge asked.

“I guess him as a person,” the defense lawyer replied.