photo of palm trees in front of a colorful sunset by Viviana Rishe on Unsplash

October 2, 2020: California has been working on a way to provide reparations for African Americans. This effort began in 2020, when Governor Gavin Newsom signed legislation giving special consideration to Black Americans. The legislation, which was authored by former Assemblymember Shirley Weber, called for the creation of a task force that would study and develop reparations proposals for African Americans. This is a first-in-the-nation attempt at providing reparations.

Merriam-Webster dictionary provides few definitions of reparations. The most relevant one is: the act of making amends, offering expiation, or giving satisfaction for a wrong or injury.

Writing for Teen Vogue, (in 2019) Jameelah Nasheed pointed out: “Historically, various groups have received reparations, including (but not limited to) payments made to Holocaust survivors and Japanese-Americans after their forced captivity in internment camps. In these cases, reparations have been financial payments, which is how they’re typically framed for descendants of slaves in the U.S.”

Cal Matters reported that the nine-member reparations task force voted 5-4 in favor of defining eligibility for reparations based on lineage “determined by an individual being an African American descendant of a chattel enslaved person or the descendant of a free Black person living in the US prior to the end of the 19th century.

In other words, the outcome of this vote establishes that only those Black Californians who are able to trace their lineage back to enslaved ancestors will be eligible for the state’s reparations. Other Black Californians – such as Black immigrants – will be excluded.

There are some opposing viewpoints about this. Kamiliah Moore, task force chairperson, said that going with a lineage-based approach would “aggrieve the victims of slavery”. Civil rights lawyer Lisa Holder argued against a strict lineage approach, stating, “We must make sure we include present day and future harms. The system that folks are advocating for here, where we splice things up, where only one small slice benefits, will not abate the harms of racism.”

The reparations task force is expected to release a reparations proposal in June 2023 with recommendations for the California Legislature. Many task force members said they expect cash payments to be one of the proposal as well as a formal apology. The task force also said that the eligibility determination will help economists tasked with quantifying the amount of reparations owed.

CBS News reported that today, Black residents are 5% of California’s population but are overrepresented in jails, prison, and homeless populations.

Testimony given to the reparations task force showed that California and local governments were complicit in stripping Black people of their wages and property, preventing them from building wealth to pass down to their children. Their homes were razed for redevelopment, and they were forced to live in predominantly minority neighborhoods, and couldn’t get bank loans that would allow them to purchase property.


MARCH 2022:

March 7, 2021: Los Angeles county officials may return a beachfront property that was seized from a Black family nearly a century ago. The Guardian reported.

Manhattan Beach used eminent domain in 1924 to force Willa and Charles Bruce, the city’s first Black landowners, off the land where they lived, KABC-TV reported on Friday. The Bruces also ran a resort for Black families during a time when beaches in the strand were segregated.

Part of the land was developed into a city park. It is now owned by Los Angeles county and houses lifeguard headquarters and a training center.

The county supervisor Janice Hahn said she was exploring options to restore justice for the family, including giving the land back, paying for what they lost or leasing the property from them so the lifeguard building can remain at the location.

“I wanted the county of Los Angeles to be a part of righting this terrible wrong,” Hahn told the station.

Meanwhile, a Manhattan Beach city taskforce is recommending that the city council consider issuing an apology and creating a commemorative plaque to acknowledge the Bruce family.

Anthony Bruce, one of the family’s last living direct descendants, now living in Florida, said the seizure robbed him of his family’s legacy.

“It was wrong against the Bruce family,” he said. “I think we would be wealthy Americans still living there in California… Manhattan Beach, probably.”

March 30, 2022: California’s first-in-the-nation task force on reparations voted Tuesday to limit state compensation to the descendants of free and enslaved Black people who were in the U.S. in the 19th century, narrowly rejecting a proposal to include all Black people regardless of lineage. NPR reported.

The vote was split 5-4, and the hours-long debate was at times testy and emotional. Near the end, the Rev. Amos Brown, president of the San Francisco branch of the NAACP and vice chair of the task force, pleaded with the commission to move ahead with a clear definition of who would be eligible for restitution.

“Please, please, please I beg us tonight, take the first step,” he said. “We’ve got to give emergency treatment to where it is needed.”

Gov. Gavin Newsom signed legislation creating the two-year reparations task force in 2020, making California the only state to move ahead with a study and plan, with a mission to study the institution of slavery and its harms and to educate the public about its findings.

Reparations at the federal level has not gone anywhere, but cities and universities are taking up the issue. The mayor of Providence, Rhode Island, announced a city commission in February while the city of Boston is considering a proposal to form its own reparations commission.

The Chicago suburb of Evanston, Illinois, became the firs U.S. city to make reparations available to Black residents last year, although there are some who say the program has done nothing to right a wrong.

California’s task force members – nearly all of whom can trace their families back to enslaved ancestors in the U.S. – were aware that their deliberations over a pivotal question will shape reparations discussions across the country. The members were appointed by the governor and the leaders of the two legislative chambers.

Those favoring a lineage approach said that a compensation and restitution plan based on genealogy as opposed to race has the best chance of surviving a legal challenge. They also opened eligibility to free Black people who migrated to the country before the 20th century, given possible difficulties in documenting family history and the risk at the time of becoming enslaved.

Others on the task force argued that reparations should include all Black people in the U.S. who suffer from systemic racism in housing, education and employment and said they were defining eligibility too soon in the process.

Civil rights attorney and task force member Lisa Holder proposed directing economists working with the task force to use California’s estimated 2.6 million Black residents to calculate compensation while they continue hearing from the public.

“We need to galvanize the base and that is Black people,” she said. “We can’t go into this reparations proposal without having all African Americans in California behind us.”

But Kamilah Moore, a lawyer and chair of the task force, said expanding eligibility would create it’s own fissures and was beyond the purpose of the committee.

“That is going to aggrieve the victims of the institution of slavery, which are direct descendants of the enslaved people in the United States,” She said. “It goes against the spirit of the law as written.”

The committee is not even a year into its two-year process and there is no compensation plan of any kind on the table. Longtime advocates have spoken of the need for multifaceted remedies for related yet separate harms, such as slavery, Jim Crow laws, mass incarceration and redevelopment that resulted in the displacement of Black communities.

Compensation could include free college, assistance buying homes and launching businesses, and grants to churches and community organizations, advocates say.

The eligibility question has dogged the task force since it’s inaugural meeting in June, when viewers called in pleading with the nine-member group to devise targeted proposals and cash payments to make whole the descendants of enslaved people in the U.S.

Chicago resident Arthur Ward called in to Tuesday’s virtual meeting, saying that he was a descendant of enslaved people and has family in California. He supports reparations based only on lineage and expressed frustration with the panel’s concerns over Black immigrants who experience racism.

“When it comes to some sort of justice, some kind of recompense, we are supposed to step to the back of the line and allow Caribbean’s and Africans to be prioritized,” Ward said. “Taking this long to decide something that should not even been a question in the first place is an insult.”

California Assemblyman Reginald Jones-Sawyer, who voted against limiting eligibility, said there is no question that descendants of slaves are the priority, but he said the task force also needs to stop ongoing harm and prevent future harm from racism. He said he wished the panel would stop “bickering” over money they don’t have yet and start discussing how to close a severe wealth gap.

“We’re arguing over cash payments, which I firmly don’t believe are the be all and end all,” he said.

Reparation critics say that California has no obligation to pay up given that the state did not practice slavery and did not enforce Jim Crow laws that segregated Black people from white people in the southern states.

But testimony provided to the committee shows California and local governments were complicit in stripping Black people of their wages and property, preventing them from building wealth to pass down to their children. Their homes were razed for redevelopment, and they were forced to live in predominantly minority neighborhoods and couldn’t get bank loans the would allow them to purchase property.

Today, Black residents are 5% of the state’s population but over-represented in jails, prison, and homeless populations. And Black homeowners continue to face discrimination in the form of home appraisals that are significantly lower than if the house were in a white neighborhood or the homeowners are white, according to testimony.

A report is due by June with a reparations proposals due by July 2023 for the Legislature to consider turning into law.


January 28, 2023: To help close the racial wealth gap, the U.S. government should pay $14 trillion in reparations to Black Americans, according to William A. Darity and A. Kristen Mullen, authors of “From Here to Equality: Reparations for Black Americans in the Twenty-First Century”, CNBC reported.

In an interview with CNBC, Darity, a Duke University professor, and Mullen, a forklorist and writer, said the federal government is financially responsible because it was culpable for the enslavement of Black Americans and legal segregation in the United States. Mullen said “the federal government was the party” to both the suppression of the Black vote and in some cases the destruction of Black people’s property.

She added that “the federal government is also the only entity that has the capacity to pay the debt.”

Darity and Mullen told CNBC that the cost of reparations would not need to be passed on to taxpayers.

“You don’t necessarily have to raise taxes to undertake these massive expenditure projects,” Darity said, citing the federal government’s $4.6 trillion Covid-19 spending as an example.

However, Darity warned that reparations could lead to inflation if not properly rolled out. To minimize risk, Darity suggested the payment should be spread out over a period of up to 10 years or the reparations should be provided in the form of assets rather than liquid cash.

“The key thing,” Darity said, “is that ultimately the discretion for the use of the funds must reside with the recipient.”


March 7, 2023: California’s Reparation Task Force has concluded its two-day public meeting geared toward compensating Black Americans affectedly the legacy of slavery. But the nine-member body is a long way off from the finish line, The Sacramento Bee reported.

The panel has until July 1 to submit its final report to the Legislature. In the meantime, it is focused on gathering feedback and working out the report’s moving parts.

One of the key discussions of the recent meeting was the creation of a new state agency – a “freedmen’s bureau” to be the authority should reparations become a reality.

Gov. Gavin Newsom in 2020 signed AB 3121, authored by then-Assemblywoman Shirley Weber, D-San Diego, to explore how California might compensate for harms caused by enslavement and racial discrimination.

More task force meetings are scheduled for March 29 and 39 in Sacramento, and approval of the final report is set for May 2 in the capital.

There will be a June 30 meeting once the report is finalized. All meetings will be in person and broadcast online.

Here are some of the top takeaways from the task force’s two-day meeting:

Establishing A State Freedman’s Bureau

The idea for the proposed California American Freedman Affairs Agency was inspired by an act passed by Congress on March 3, 1865.

Back then, the federal government established a Freedmen’s Bureau to provide food, shelter, clothing, medical services, and land to African Americans newly freed from enslavement.

Nearly 160 years later, California’s task force looks to create an agency with the power to implement reparations and have oversight to ensure its many goals are met.

They could include implementing programs and policies that benefit the quality of life for descendants of enslaved Blacks. It could also provide services to the descendant community through contracts, grants or partnerships with community-based organizations, private entities and other local, state and federal agencies.

“That’s what the spirit of this new independent agency would be. It would be a permanent place and space for this unique group of people to get the services that they’ve been denied and despoiled for centuries,” task force chair Kamilah Moore said.

The proposed state freedmen’s bureau could include different branches to cover different areas reparations, such as confirming genealogy for eligibility of services. Other branches might handle legal affairs, data and research, social services and family affairs, medical/psychological services and business affairs for entrepreneurship.

Many on the panel said the recommendations, if approved, would give the new state agency “teeth.”..

...Unjust Land Seizures

The task force hasn’t decided upon a definitive dollar amount for reparations. There have been some estimates in the media, but task force member Don Tamaki said the group has “left it up to the economists to do the number-crunching and they’re still looking at data on housing, mass incarceration and so forth. Work is being done, but it’s not ready to present.”

Five harms committed against Black Americans identified by the task force will likely impact how they ultimately calculate an amount.

Those harms include:

  • Property taken unjustly through eminent domain from 1850 to 2020
  • Devaluation of Black businesses from 1850 to 2020
  • Housing discrimination and redlining from 1933 to 1977
  • Mass incarceration and over policing from 1970 to 2020
  • Harms related to health from 1900 to 2000

Task force member Amos C. Brown reminded his colleagues not to “gloss over” the land and property component of that review.

“In 1900, we owned about 19 million acres of land. But now we have less than 3 million,” Brown said. “We (have to) look at how land was stolen from us in the Fillmore in San Francisco. In West Oakland, in South Central Los Angeles. And other areas across the state. And even Allensworth.”

Allensworth is a Central Valley town founded in the early 20th century by Blacks who were ex-slaves. It’s now managed by the California Department of Parks and Recreations.

Task force member Reginald Jones-Sawyer mentioned how eminent domain was used as a tool to displace residents of Black neighborhoods of Los Angeles, when the Century Freeway, Interstate 105 was built.

The Los Angeles Times reported that more than 21,000 residents had lost their homes because of the freeway which was completed in 1993. The Times reported that some of those residents were overwhelmed by the pain of being forced out, suffering heart attacks or dying by suicide. Highway engineers conceded that the cost of building interstates through cities was too great…


March 10, 2023: A proposal to pay Black people in California up to $1.2 million in restitution for slavery ran into political headwinds Wednesday as Gov. Gavin Newsom and a lawmaker who was on the state panel raised doubts about the prospect of cash payments, Politico reported.

State Sen. Steven Bradford said he wouldn’t count on the Legislature – though dominated by Democrats – to vote in favor of payments, one of the recommendations of a panel expected to release its final recommendations on July 1.

“I’m realistic enough to know that we might not have colleagues who are willing to do that,” Bradford told reporters.

He spoke after Newsom sparked an uproar with a statement that hailed the findings of the task force as a milestone but specifically noted that dealing with the legacy of slavery “is about much more than cash payments.”

The governor was acknowledging political reality, Bradford said.

“I think he’s setting a real realistic expectation that there probably won’t be check payments in the tune of or the amount of what we’ve battled around the last two years since we started this process,” he said.

The comments from Newsom and Bradford illustrated the considerable political obstacles to compensating Black people for the harms of slavery, even in a progressive state that drew praise for creating a groundbreaking task force. Those challenges will be magnified by California’s enormous budget deficit, the contentiousness of proposing cash payment and, Bradford acknowledged, resistance from fellow Democrats.

Newsom signed the task force into law in 2020, touting California as being the first state to study reparations and calling the bill a corrective to the “structural racism and bias built into and permeating throughout our democratic and economic institutions.”

After months of meetings and public input, the panel released a semifinal report on May 6 calculating that the cumulative cost of mass incarceration, housing discrimination, and healthcare inequity could amount to $1.2 million per person at the high end.

It would be up to the Legislature and Newsom to enact any element of the report.

Many of the recommendations have already begun to be addressed, Newsom noted in a statement.

“We should continue to work as a nation to reconcile our original sin of slavery and understand how that history has shaped our country,” he said. “Dealing with the legacy of slavery is about much more than cash payments.”

Bradford similarly described an array of non-cash solutions that include more funding for healthcare, buying homes and bringing higher education. But he said Newsom’s statement also conceded the limitations of what California will be able to accomplish. “I’ve tried to temper people’s expectation that it might not be a check,” Bradford said.

The apparent retreat from payments drew criticism, including from the Reverend Amos Brown, a civil rights activist who was vice-chair of the reparations task force.

“We’re being disingenuous when we all of a sudden want to run away from money,” Brown said.

Any legislation arising from the work of the task force in the coming years could face a challenging path to Newsom’s desk. California is staring down a budget deficit estimated $22.5 billion in January.

Supporters of reparations have long stressed that the concept encompasses more than monetary payments. The author of the bill creating the panel, then-Assembly member Shirley Weber, said in 2020 that the measure “does not take a position on the form of reparations should take but does take a clear position on reparations as necessary.”

The panel’s report recommended offering “the payment of cash or its equivalent” to people who had been harmed by slavery. It also recommended the Legislature offer a “down payment’ with an immediate disbursement of a meaningful amount of funds.”

California has since moved to more directly compensate the descendants of enslaved people for their losses: A 2021 bill signed by Newsom returned a costal property called Bruce’s Beach to the descendants of Black owners who’d seen the land stripped away in the early 20th century. But the report noted that losses are not always easy to quantify.

“Not all specific harms perpetrated against the state’s African American residents involve land – or other property that can be easily returned,” the panel said. “In those cases, those individual harms must be remedied with monetary compensation.”


March 29, 2023: KQED reported Alison Ford grew up on Parker Street in South Berkeley.

Her mother was a postal worker – everything from a mail sorter to a window clear. When she had weekend shifts, she’d take Ford and her younger sister, Sabrina, across the Bay Bridge to their great-grandmother’s house in San Francisco.

Winfrey Broadnax Ford, known as Granny Ford to the family, had Ford and Sabrina help tend the small garden in the backyard of the Marina-style home she owned in the Bayview neighborhood, a section of San Francisco where Black people once were a majority of the residents.

Ford, who was always interested in her family history, but it wasn’t until Granny Ford, her father’s grandmother, died in 2016 – at the age 102 – that she really began seeking out information about the distant relatives she only knew vaguely from Granny Ford’s stories. She wanted more context about who she was.

Ford ultimately traced her lineage to generations of enslaved ancestors, all the way back to her great-great-great-great-grandfather, Isaac.

“[He] was probably a slave until he was my age,” said Ford, 44. “That is mind-blowing to me. And he then went on to sharecrop and have kids that did the same. But his grandkids were literate and landowners.”

“I’ve always felt connected to that part of my family history, because I spent so much time with my great-grandmother,” she continued. “Growing up, I know that I was only a couple of generations removed from slavery.”

California’s Reparations Task Force is examining the historic harms of slavery and anti-Black racism in California. Last summer, the task force released a preliminary report (PDF) detailing California’s history of enslavement and its many decades of discriminatory policies – in housing, education, health care, criminal justice and other areas – that established the systemic racism that persists today. This summer, the task force will present recommendations on how Black residents should be compensated for this ensuring oppression.

If the task force’s recommendations are adopted by the state’s Legislature, many Black Californians will have to prove their eligibility for reparations. To help with this, a preliminary report proposed establishing a California African American Freedmen Affairs Agency to “support potential claimants with genealogical research to confirm eligibility.”

In a 5-4 vote in March 2022, the task force voted in favor of lineage-based reparations that would be “determined by an individual being an African American descendant of a chattel enslaved person or the descendant of a free Black person living in the U.S. prior to the end of the 19th century.” But there’s still a lot yet to be finalized about what kind of specific documentation would be required to prove eligibility.

Eligibility has loomed over the first-in-the-nation statewide task force since it began meeting in June 2021. There’s a wide spectrum of opinion on how feasible it will be to document eligibility — and considerable concern about the emotional toll Black Californians will have to pay.

The task force will continue the debate on eligibility Wednesday and Thursday in Sacramento, including defining the parameters of a residency requirement.

Ford allowed me to observe a session with a genealogy consultant, offering a window into the process of documenting ancestry. Having a deeper understanding of what her ancestors endured brought the weight of their existence into sharper focus.

“Such a huge net of people had to go through so many traumatic things for me to be here having this conversation,” she told KQED. “I don’t think there’s an amount of money that would make it right, but I think that it serves to show that there has just been generational trauma that has very directly led to the financial disenfranchisement of African Americans in this country.

If a person can track their ancestry back to the 1870 census, and their relative was living in a state that practiced enslavement, some genealogists feel it is sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the ancestor likely was enslaved. The census tracked additional components, like whether a person could read and write; that could lend support to the likelihood the person was enslaved since enslavers often forbid the people they held captive from becoming literate.

Black people were not counted as part of the country’s population until the 1870 census, the first undertaken after the Civil War. That’s because, until then, enslaved people were considered property, said Sharon Morgan, who runs Our Black Ancestry, a Facebook genealogy group with more than 36,000 members.

“For people who were enslaved, we were not considered people,” said Morgan, a genealogist in Macon, Mississippi, who has served as a consultant for the Afro-American Historical and Genealogical Society “You find them in property records.”

Many genealogists, including Morgan, said they were only able to access some records by sifting through physical archives. Morgan originally traveled to Mississippi, where the vestiges of enslavement show in glaring racial disparities show in glaring racial disparities, to do research on a distant relative who, she said, had 17 children fathered by the nephew of her enslaver. “I came to Mississippi to write a book about it, and I ended up staying. And my book still isn’t finished,” she said.

“You have to be lucky enough to find a will, a deed, or some other family papers, farm records – something else that will identify your ancestor,” Morgan continued. “But there’s another problem, because those lists are generally only by first name.”

Kellie Farrish, a genealogist based in the East Bay, said the scavenger hunt described by Morgan is mostly a thing of the past because of the digitization of records.

“It used to be a lot of traveling,” said Farrish, who presented at a task force meeting in March of 2022.
And [the records are] in boxes, if they’re even maintained at all. That world just doesn’t exist anymore.”

Farrish, who owns Reparative Genealogy, which helps Black people trace their lineage to the earliest ancestor documented in the United States, has been working in genealogy for more than 15 years. The first time we talked on the phone, she told me to think about navigating genealogy like navigating geography: Drivers used a road atlas before printing out MapQuest directions; now they use Google Maps on their phones.

“It’s the same with genealogy,” she said. “This is what ancestry has become. And the group that needs to realize this the most is African Americans. As we build out everyone’s [family] tree, this work becomes easier and easier and easier…

…Cheryl Grills, director of the Psychology Applied Research Center at Loyola Marymount University and a task force member, voted against lineage-based reparations because of the trauma associated with searching for enslaved ancestors.

“Not every Black person wants to do this genealogy thing. It could be triggering,” Grills said. “It could be traumatizing because [of] what the family had to go through, what the family suffered and endured.”…


May 1, 2023: The California Reparations Task Force published documents Monday indicating it plans to recommend the state apologize for racism and slavery and consider “down payments” of varying amounts to eligible African American residents, Cal Matters reported.

The documents, numbering more than 500 pages, do not contain an overall price tag for reparations, but they do include ways the state could calculate how much money African Americans in California have lost since 1850, when the state was established, through today due to certain government practices.

The loss calculations would vary depending on type of racial harm and how long a person has lived in California. The loss estimates range from $2,300 per person per year of residence for the over-policing of Black communities, to $77,000 total per person for Black-owned business losses and devaluations over the years.

The state-appointed task force faces a July 1 deadline to make reparations recommendations to the Legislature and Gov. Gavin Newsom. Task force leaders have said they expect the Legislature to come up with actual reparation amounts.

The task force is also recommending a variety of policy changes to counteract discrimination.

“It is critical that we compensate, but not just compensate. We also need to evaluate policy that continues to hold us back,” said Monica Montgomery Steppe, a San Diego city council member who is on the task force. She spoke at a “listening session” in San Diego Saturday.

Who would get reparations?

The task force documents discuss two kinds of reparations: those arising from particular instances of discrimination or harm that require an individual to file a claim, and those that involve distributing money or benefits to all eligible Black Californians for racial harm the entire community experienced.

A recent example of an individual claim was Bruce’s Beach. Where is My Land grew out of a local effort to help a Black family in Manhattan Beach seized from a Black family nearly 100 years ago. Recently, partly because of the task force, government leaders returned the land deed to descendants of the Bruce family, who re-sold it to Los Angeles County for $20 million.

It is one of the few times a Black family was restored property taken by a local government.

Eligibility for reparations continues to be a controversy. The task force in March 2022 voted to limit potential compensation to descendants of free and enslaved Black people who were in the United States in the 19th century. The group narrowly rejected a proposal to include all Black people, including recent immigrants, regardless of lineage.

Everyone in the eligible class should be compensated, the task force report says, even if they can’t prove they suffered a specific harm.

“The state of California created laws and policies discriminating against and subjugating free and enslaved African Americans and their descendants,” the report says. “In doing so, the discriminatory policies made no distinctions between these individuals; the compensatory remedy must do the same.”

The final report, much like the task force’s previous interim report, lays out the history of systemic racism and ongoing injustices in California.

Costs of racial damage

The latest batch of documents also urges eligible people to be compensated in cash, sooner rather than later. The records instruct the Legislature to begin with “down payments” rather than waiting for full loss calculations.

The final report suggests dollar figures for certain categories of racial damage:

  • For mass incarceration and the over-policing of Black communities, it estimates a loss per person of $115,260, or $2,352 for each year they lived in California from 1971 to 2020.
  • For housing discrimination, it offered two methods of loss calculation. One method based on gaps between Black and white “housing wealth” would peg losses at $145,847 per person. The other method, based on government’s “redlining” history, including discriminatory lending and zoning, would calculate Black residents’ losses at $148,099 per person – or $3,366 for each year they lived in California from 1933 to 1977.
  • For injustices and discrimination in health, it estimates $13,619 per person for each year lived in California, or $966,921 total for someone living about 71 years – the average life expectancy of Black residents in California in 2021.

The reparations program would be overseen by a state news agency that would determine eligibility and distribute funds, the report says. The agency also would be responsible for helping individuals document and provide evidence for specific injustices.

Eligible Black residents should not expect cash payments anytime soon. The state Legislature and Newsom will decide whether any reparations are paid, and it’s unclear what they will do with the task force recommendations.

“This is the time where we really need the voice of the public,” said Khansa T. Jones-Muhammad, also known as Friday Jones, a member of Los Angeles’ reparations advisory commission. “This is the time to get your churches together. This is the time to get your school boards together.”

Jones made the comments during the listening session in San Diego.

Non-cash reparations

Some task force members have been dismayed at the amount of attention paid to the dollar futures under discussion. The final report provides dozens of policy recommendations aimed at preventing further discrimination and harm against Black residents.

“The biggest fight is implementation of all these recommendations,” Montgomery Steppe said. “After the task force issues its final report, those recommendations need strong support in California’s Legislature and the government. It will take all hands on deck to ensure we push for a policy change from our state legislature.”

The task force is scheduled to meet again a 9 a.m. Saturday at Lisser Hall at Northeastern University, 5000 MacArthur Blvd, in Oakland. The meeting will be live streamed.


May 7, 2023: (NPR) A California panel has called for billions in reparations for descendants of slaves

California’s reparations task force voted Saturday to approve recommendations on how the state may compensate and apologize to Black residents for generations of harm caused by discriminatory policies.

The nine-members of the committee, which first convened nearly two years ago, gave final approval to a meeting in Oakland to a hefty list of of proposals that now go to state lawmakers to consider for reparations legislation.

U.S. Rep. Barbara Lee – D-Oakland, who is cosponsoring a bill in Congress to study restitution proposals for African Americans, at the meeting called on states and the federal government to pass reparations legislation.

“Reparations are not only morally justifiable, but they have the potential to address longstanding racial disparities and inequalities,” Lee said.

The panel’s first vote approved a detailed account of historical discrimination against Black Californians in areas such as voting, housing, education, disproportionate policing and incarceration and others.

Other recommendations on the table ranged from the creation of a new agency to provide services to descendants of enslaved people to calculations on what the state owes them in compensation.

“An apology and an admission of wrongdoing just by itself is not going to be satisfactory,” said Chris Lodgson, an organizer with the Coalition for a Just and Equitable California, a reparations advocacy group.

An apology crafted by lawmakers must “include a censure of the gravest barbarities” carried out on behalf of the state, according to the draft recommendation approved by the task force

Those would include a condemnation of former Gov. Peter Hardeman Burnett, the state’s firs elected governor and a white supremacist who encouraged laws to exclude Black people from California.

After California entered the union in 1850 as a “free” state, it did not enact any laws to guarantee freedom for all, the draft recommendation notes. On the contrary, the state Supreme Court enforced the federal Fugitive Slave Act, which allowed for the capture and return of runaway enslaved people, for over a decade until emancipation.

“By participating in these hours, California further perpetuated the harms African Americans faces, imbuing racial prejudice throughout society through segregation, public and private discrimination, and unequal disbursal of state and federal funding,” the document says.

The task force approved a public apology acknowledging the state’s responsibilities for past wrongs and promising the state will not repeat them. It would be issued in the presence of people whose ancestors were enslaved.

California has previously apologized for placing Japanese Americans in internment camps during World War II and for violence agains and mistreatment of Native Americans.

The panel also approved a section of the draft report saying reparations should include “cash or its equivalent” for eligible residents.

More than 100 residents and advocates gathered at Mills College of Northeastern University in Oakland, a city that is the birthplace of the Black Panther Party. They shared frustrations over the country’s “broken promise” to offer up to 40 acres and a mule to newly freed enslaved people.

Many said it is past time for governments to repair the harms that have kept African Americans from living without fear of being wrongfully prosecuted, retaining property and building wealth.

Elaine Brown, former Black Panther Party chairwoman, urged people to express their frustrations through demonstrations.

Saturday’s task force meeting marked a crucial moment in the long fight for local, state and federal governments to atone for discriminatory policies against African Americans. The proposals are far from implementation, however.

“There’s no way in the world that many of these recommendations are going to get through because of the inflationary impact,” said Roy L. Brooks, a professor and reparations scholar at the University of San Diego School of Law.

Some estimates from economists have projected that the state could owe upwards of $800 billion, or more than 2.5 times its annual budget, in reparations to Black people.

The figure in the latest draft report released by the task force is far lower. The group had not responded to email and phone requests for comment on the reduction.

Secretary of State Shirley Weber, a former Democratic assemblymen, authored legislation in 2020 creating he task force with a focus on the state’s historical culpability for harms against African Americans, and not as a substitute for any additional reparations that may come from the federal government.

The task force voted previously to limit reparations to defendants of enslaved or free Black people who were in the country by the end of the 19th century.

The group’s work has garnered nationwide attention, as efforts to research and secure reparations for African Americans elsewhere had mixed results.

The Chicago suburb of Evanston, for example, has offered housing vouchers to Black residents but few have benefited from the program so far.

In New York, a bill to acknowledge the inhumanity of slavery in the state and create a commission to study reparations proposals has passed the Assembly but not received a vote in the Senate.

And on the federal level, a decades-old proposal to create a commission studying reparations for African Americans has stalled in Congress.

Oakland city Councilmember Kevin Jenkins called the California task force’s work “a powerful example” of what can happen when people work together.

“I am confident that through our collective efforts, we can make a significant drive in advancing reparations in our great state of California and ultimately the country, Jenkins said.


May 7, 2023: California has approved $1.2 million in reparations for every Black resident. PolitiFact declared this statement is false.

No, every Black Californian is not receiving $1.2 million for reparations

After a California-based task force voted to approve a recommendation for reparations to be paid to Black residents, some people tweeted news that distorted its impact.

“California has approved $1.2 million in reparations for every black resident,” social media influencer Amiri King tweeted May 7. “Activists are unhappy and are demanding $200m each. What do you think?

Others tweeted similar claims, and in a response to PolitiFact, King reiterated that the task force approved the payments. But this rumor misunderstands the power of the group’s action. A legislatively mandated task force made a recommendation for reparations, but there has been no official action that would finalize awarding reparations to each Black Californian, let alone an amount in the millions.

The task force will meet once more before July 1, the deadline for submitting recommendations. Before any version of the proposal could become law, the Legislature would have to vote and pass it to the governor’s desk for signature.

Although Democrat Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a bill authorizing the task force’s formation, he has not publicly said that he supports the group’s specific recommendations.

“Dealing with that legacy is about much more than cash payments,” Newsom said in a May 10 statement to KCRA-TV in Sacramento. “This work must continue. Following the Task Forces submission of its final report this summer, I look forward to a continued partnership with the legislature to advance systemic changes that ensure an inclusive and equitable future for all Californians.”

Newsom in 2020 signed Assembly Bill 3121, establishing the nine-member Task Force to Study and Develop Reparation Proposals for African Americans. The move followed the murder of George Floyd, who died May 25, 2020, after a Minneapolis police officer Derick Chauvinism pined his knee to Floyd’s neck for several minutes.

The task force, composed of state and city lawmakers, a civil rights leader, clinical psychologist, attorneys and an economic anthropologist and the geographer, was assigned to study reparations to people in the Black community and make recommendations to the state. The group spent three years examining “the institution of slavery and its lingering negative effects on living African Americans, including descendants of persons enslaved in the United States and on society,” according to the groups’s website.

On May 7, the task force approved recommendations to compensate Black people for harms from discriminatory health care and housing, mass incarceration and overpricing, unjust property takings and devaluation on African American businesses. Economists and others measured these harms by years when state-endorsed policies and actions would have affected Black Californians. But the report said the findings were “preliminary estimates of monetary losses to African Americans” across three of those five categories.

“The Task Force recommends that when the Legislature engages in its eventual determination, it releases to the public the data underpinning this calculation to allow scholars and experts to have access to this information and to better understand the process by which the costs were calculated,” the Task Force’s report said.

Black people comprise of about 6.5% of the state’s population, about 2.5 million people, U.S. Census numbers show. If the sate were to proceed with the proposal’s recommendations, an estimate by The New York Times found a lifelong, 71-year-old resident could theoretically be eligible to receive more than $1 million. But that doesn’t mean every Black resident would get that amount, if it became law.

Possible estimated values of recommended reparations for Black Californians include:

For heath disparities: $13,619 for each year of residency, based on Black Californians’ life expectancy of 71 years.

for mass incarceration and over-policing: $115,260 or $2,352 for each year of California residency during the 49-year period from 1971 to 2020.

for housing discrimination: $148,099, or $3,366 for each year lived in California from 1933 to 1977.

The task force also recommended compensation for unjust property seizures and devaluation of businesses because of state policies. But the group stopped short of assigning dollar amounts to reparations and instead suggested strategies the Legislature could employ to arrive at fair compensation. It also recommended that the state issue a formal apology to Black Americans similar to the apologies given to Japanese Americans for racist treatment and forced internment camps during World War II and to Native Americans of violence, mistreatment and neglect.

State Sen. Stephen Bradford, D-Gardena, a task force member, told KCRA-TV and Politico he doubted the Legislature would ultimately approve direct-payment reparations. He said he believed Newsom was being careful in his public statement not to suggest otherwise.

“I think he’s setting a realistic expectation there probably won’t be check payments in the amount we’ve bantered around,” Bradford told KCRA. “I’ve tried to temper people’s expectations that it might not be a check.”

Our ruling

King tweeted, “California has approved $1.2 million in reparations for every black resident.”

A state-mandated task force recommended reparations to the state’s Black residents. One estimate suggests that, if they were implemented, a 71-year-old lifelong resident of California might be eligible for more than $1 million. But that does not mean every Black resident would receive that amount – and any plan would require legislative and gubernatorial approval to become law.

The task force has yet to send its final plan to the Legislature, but will do so by July 1. The claim is premature and lacks a full understanding of the task force’s actions.

We rate this claim False.


USA TODAY (via Microsoft Start) reported that members of the California Reparations Task Force are set to vote this weekend on a plan detailing recommendations for state compensation for eligible African Americans for financial losses brought on by slavery and decades of institutional racism.

If passed, the group would submit final recommendations by June 30 to the California State Legislature, where lawmakers would decide whether to follow through with reparations and whether to accept or modify the methodology proposed by the task force.

“This is necessary because it’s long overdue from a state and federal level,” said Jovan Scott Lewis, associate professor at the University of California, Berkeley. “Despite the progress that the country and state continue to make in various ways, we continue to see African Americans not benefiting from this progress.”

How are potential reparations calculated?

Earlier this week, the group issued more details, including potential payout estimates calculated by economist advisers who considered areas of harm affecting the state’s Black community and their resulting economic losses. Each was assessed over particular time frames “since different laws and policies inflected measurable injury across different periods,” the documents state.

The five areas of harm cited for consideration include health care inequities, housing discrimination, mass incarceration, and over-policing of African Americans, unjust taking of property by eminent domain, and devaluation of African American businesses.

Lewis, a member of the task force, said those areas extend beyond slavery itself, precluding arguments that California should not be responsible for reparations having not been a slave state.

According to the documents, “the state’s participation in the discriminatory denial of equal healthcare, unjust property takings and devaluation of African Americans businesses began with the founding of the state in 1850 and has continue to this day.”

As proposed by the task force, residents who can show descendant from enslaved persons and eligibility under each category could be entitled to certain amounts. For example, a Black resident who is 71 years old – the average life expectancy for the California Black population – and had lived in the state their entire life could be eligible for about $1.2 million.

“The task force is recommending a methodology, not a particular dollar amount,” Lewis said. “That’s not our responsibility. The state Legislature will have to decide whether or not they want to provide compensation to the community based on the losses we have calculated.”

A similar process was used in determination of reparations to eligible Japanese Americans affected by the injustices of World War II relocation and internment. Eligible surviving recipients received $20,000 and an apology from then-President Ronald Reagan…

What’s the next step?

Should the Legislature pursue reparations, the task force recommends kicking off the payout process with “down payments” representing “a meaningful amount of funds” to eligible recipients. It could also recommend the state issue a formal apology for its role in enforcing the federal fugitive slave law, construction of Confederate monuments, interracial marriage bans and segregation.

According to CalMatters, implementation would require formation of a new state agency oversee fund distribution and eligibility determination, including helping residents to trace their lineage.

Some expect the plan to meet opposition from Republican and moderate Democrat legislators.

Lewis said what the task force set out to do from the start was “was to respond to the breadth of harms that this community has experienced. This is a reasonable and responsible set of recommendations, and ultimately it will be up to the state, and the California public, to decide what to do.”


June 6, 2023: As California prepares to release a report that will recommend reparations for descendants of enslaved people, federal lawmakers are pursuing their own efforts to redress the effects of slavery and the generations of discrimination that has followed for Black Americans, NBC News reported.

Rep. Cori Bush, D-Mo., introduced the latest federal effort to support reparations last month with H.R. 414, the Reparations Now Resolution, which seeks to advance reparations at the federal, state, and local levels.

Bush said the country has “a moral and legal obligation” to repair the “lasting harm” caused by the enslavement of millions of Africans, and by practices such as segregation and redlining on subsequent generations. The resolution indicates that a minimum of $14 trillion would be necessary to close the racial wealth gap and other inequities.

The resolution comes as the California reparations task force, established in 2020 to study and develop proposals, wraps up its work. Following a 500-page interim report last year, the group has held multiple public hearings, and will release its final report by July 1.

“I have, for the better part of two years, stated that reparations is more than just a check,” California Assemblyman Reginald Jones-Sawyer, a task force member, said in a statement. “It is about removing institutional barriers in the form of laws that have and continue to marginalize Black communities in California.”

State lawmakers will need to propose policies as bills in the Legislature.

Rep. Barbara Lee, a California Democrat who has been in Congress since 1988, is a longtime supporter of reparations. She spoke when the statewide task force convened this year and was also a co-sponsor of Bush’s resolution on Capitol Hill.

“Congresswoman Bush’s reparation resolution couldn’t come at a more important time, as my home state of California continues to progress with the work being done by their reparations task force,” Lee said through a spokesperson. “We’re hopeful that the task force’s recommendations serve as a model for the federal government and for states across the country. It is far past time for the federal government to catch up. And make no mistake: We have the pieces in place here in Congress to move forward.

Members of the California task force, for their part, have said they want the report to have national impact.

“This will be the model for everyone, whether they do it at their local level, state level, or when they finally do national reparations,” Jones-Sawyer told NBC News in March. “This will be used by others,” he added. “And the reason ours will hold up is because the foundation of it is based on data, hard core data, suitable data.”

Lee re-introduced a resolution in May calling for the establishment of the first United States Commission on Truth, Racial Healing and Transformation to examine the effects of slavery, institutional racism and discrimination against people of color.

Lee said the many challenges Black communities face today – from health disparities laid bare by the pandemic, to economic inequality and poverty, to environmental racism – can be traced back to what she termed “400 years of systemic government-sanctioned racism.”

While calls for reparations in America date to slavery’s abolition in the 1860’s in 1989 Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., introduced what would become H.R. 40 to study slavery, its effects and appropriate remedies. Conyers introduced the legislation at the beginning of each congressional session for nearly three decades (he died in 2019, two years after leaving Congress.)

Rep. Shelia Jackson Lee, D-Texas, has taken up the mantle in the House of Representatives by introducing an updated version of H.R. 40. It would establish a commission to study reparations and consider a national apology and other redress for the institution of slavery, as well as subsequent racial and economic discrimination against African Americans.

The previous congress voted to advance the legislation out of committee and to the House floor for full consideration. It was the first time H.R. 40 had passed a committee vote, but it did not past beyond that historic step.

Lee described the measure as a “pathway for a governmental framework that will help restore the national balanced and unity in terms of wealth, health care, education, housing and the criminal justice system.” She added that it would enable Congress to start a movement toward the national reckoning that is needed to help bridge racial divides.

Predicting that “America will truly be the beneficiary,” Jackson Lee said that “reparations are ultimately about respect, reconciliation and healing – and the hope that one day, Americans of all backgrounds can walk together toward a more just future.”

In January, Sen. Cory Booker, D, N.J., introduced S. 40, the Senate companion legislation to H.R. 40.

“Our nation must reckon with its dark past of slavery and its continued oppression of African Americans, fueled by white supremacy and racism,” Booker said in a statement. “May of our bedrock domestic principles that have ushered millions of American into the middle class have systematically excluded Black individuals.”

All total, hundreds of organizations have endorsed the various reparations legislation now pending in Congress.

“We’ve been working on it for two year, said Bush, now in her second term. “Before I entered Congress, I promised on the campaign trail that I’d this if ever given the chance”

She added: “There is momentum. It’s time.”


June 13, 2023: After more than two years of fact-finding, reports and public hearings, the California Reparations Task Force on June 29 will hand over to state lawmakers an extensive report and recommendations for compensation to eligible Black people of California for the harms of slavery NBC News reported.

The task force will hold its final meeting in Sacramento, the agenda says that members will issue final statements and make public the full report.

California was not a slave state, but more than 4,000 enslaved Black people were taken there between 1850 and 1860, typically by plantation owners, to work in the gold mines. Many settled in California after slavery ended, some creating wealth, buying land and building communities, only to face generations of discrimination, land theft or seizure, disproportionate overpricing, housing segregation, inadequate schools and other issues that have led to racial disparities in many areas of life.

In 2021, then-Assemblywoman Shirley Webber, a Democrat, authored a bill to form a task force to examine and develop reparation proposals for the harms of slavery on Black people in California. It is the most ambitious effort in the country to address redress for the impact of slavery on Black people, with task force members saying they want to create a reparations blueprint for the country.

The California Legislature will then have all the power. Lawmakers will review the recommendations and will have the authority to adopt, dismiss or adjust them. Whatever they decide must be approved by both houses before it would be presented to Gov. Gavin Newsom to sign into law.

Here are some fundamental answers to key questions about the reparations efforts for Black people in California:

For many, reparations are about money. When could those eligible expect to receive funds and how much will the task force recommend?

The task force hired four economists to develop data-based determinants for the harms of slavery like housing, education, public health and others. However, task force member Don Tamaki said the committee’s final report will not include any dollar recommendations. Although previous reports indicated that the task force would recommend $1.2 million per eligible person, in installments, Tamaki said the committee decided ti have the economists propose methodologies to calculate harm. “Neither they nor the task force has recommended that the state pay any amount,” he said.

That means it will be up to the California Assembly to determine financial compensation to those eligible after reviewing the extensive report.

Tamaki added that should the Legislature want to provide monetary payment to eligible citizens the task force has recommended that the amount be calculated based on how long such persons lived in California and other factors.

Who would be eligible for reparations?

Figuring out who would receive reparation would be a complicated process. First, they would have to trace their lineage directly to a person who had been enslaved in the United States, or to African Americans who lived in the U.S. prior to 1900. This presumes “that such persons are descendants of enslaved ancestors or free persons who ran the risk of being enslaved during the 246 years that the institution of slavery existed in American,” Tamaki said.

However, determining that lineage may be a challenge. DNA testing from companies like Ancestry.com can establish what parts of Africa someone is from and that person’s dominant gene pool. But DNA testing along may not determine if someone is a direct descendant of an enslaved African in the United States. Documents like birth certificate and census records can show a person’s lineage, but some may need a genealogist’s help – and hiring a genealogist is not inexpensive.

“But even that is not going to guarantee that someone can establish their lineage through records because the records were messy,” said psychologist Cheryl Grills, another task force member. “Records were destroyed. Buildings burned. Information was recorded incorrectly. Names were changed for various reasons. So that may be a challenge… Genealogists are going to be in high demand.”

Additionally, there would be tiers to eligibility based on the amount of time one lived in California – currently or in the past – and the calculations of the harms based on, say, the devaluation of Black businesses, financial losses due to redlining, housing discrimination, or the taking of land or property by eminent domain. “There are multiple calculations,” Grills said, meaning each eligible person would not get the same amount, if any at all.

How would California pay for financial reparations?

There are ways that the state could generate funds, Grills said, including tax programs. There’s also the opportunity for the state to pay out in installments rather than in a lump sum. “And in doing that,” Grills said, the Californian government “can stretch out the hit to the state budget.”

She added: “America is resourceful and California is a resourceful state. When it has come to a need to generate resources to handle a situation, American has found the money. When we had to come up with billions of dollars for Ukraine, nobody asked that question. The same with 9/11 victims. When we paid out reparations to Japanese Americans, nobody asked, “Where’s that money going to come from?” So, I have to ask the question, why now? It’s a veiled question that questions if Black people deserve to be compensated for what has been done to them… That’s what California has to do in this case of reparations.”

What programs will be recommended to address the harms of slavery?

The task force has recommended more than 100 programs or policies as redress for the harms of slavery. There are a dozen areas covered in the recommendations:

  • Racial terror
  • Political disenfranchisement
  • Housing segregation
  • Separate and unequal education
  • Racism in environment and infrastructure
  • Pathologizing the Black Family
  • Conrtrol over creative, cultural and intellectual life
  • Stolen labor and hindered opportunity
  • An unjust legal system
  • Mental and physical harm and neglect
  • The racial wealth gap

These areas are “as important as compensation for eligible individuals,” Tamaki said. Why? Because the aftereffects of slavery and racial discrimination are long-lasting and deep, leading to massive disparities for Black people in virtually every walk of life, including jobs, health care, education and housing and home ownership. For example, some formerly enslaved people who built wealth through owning land had their property taken, their descendants say, denying the creation of generational wealth.

“The task force has not recommended that individual compensation should be prioritized over any other remedy,” Tamaki said.

The committee recommended that many of these programs be run by or through the California American Freedmen’s Affairs Agency, which would establish an updated version of the Freedmen’s Bureau, the organization instituted in 1865, after the Civil War, to assist formerly enslaved people. Some opposed to the bureau say existing organizations that specialize and have established staff in specific areas should be charged with this task.

Who could be left out of receiving reparations?

Because of the complexity of establishing eligibility, there is potential for many to not receive reparations. Grills said, “our most vulnerable could be left out: children in the child welfare system who cannot trace their family heritage; our folks who are incarcerated who don’t have access to the tools to establish their lineage because they can’t hop on a computer in prison; and our folks who are suffering from mental illness, who aren’t going to have the wherewithal; and our folks who are unhoused.”

In those cases, Grills said, the freedman’s agency would be responsible for helping those who cannot establish lineage. And if that fails, “it is unclear what provision could be put in place to address this,” she added.

When will the California Legislature vote on the task force’s reparations recommendations?

No one is sure. The preliminary report was 500 pages; the final report may be double that size. So Grills said it is likely that the Assembly will digest its content over the summer and address it around September.


June 29, 2023: A task force examining reparations for Black residents in California released its final report Thursday with more than 115 recommendations for how the state should compensate those harmed by slavery and “historical atrocities.” CNN reported.

Recommendations in the landmark report comprised of more than 1,000 pages, include a formal apology on behalf of California to descendants of people enslaved in the United States and recommendations for reforms linked to health care, housing, education and criminal justice, among other areas.

The drafters of the report, which will be shared with the California State Legislature by July 1, hope it serves as a blueprint for future laws.

“We’re putting before the legislators in California the challenge to come up with a feasible way to address these issues over the years,” Don Tamaki, an attorney and task force member, told CNN. “To ignore them is just to invite not only the harm to continue, but to grow worse. We need to start this process.”

Tamaki said the task force members hope lawmakers commit to an effort that takes several years.

“These are harms that were literally centuries in the making,” said Tamaki. “So the repairs have to be long in the implementation,”

While the task force is recommending monetary compensation for those impacted, it did not provide a specific amount that should be paid. The amount should be determined by lawmakers, the task force said.

The task force hired a panel of experts, including economists, to calculate what Black Califorians have endured. Through their formula, they determined that an eligible person could be owed up to an estimated $1.2 million.

In the case of monetary reparations, only those individuals who can demonstrate that they are the descendant of either an enslaved African American in the US or free African American living in the US prior to 1900 should be eligible, the report says.

The task force also included ways to calculate reparations due to health disparities, mass incarceration and over-policing, housing discrimination and devaluation of African American businesses, according to the report.

“No, it isn’t just about a check in the mail,” Tamaki said. “It’s about everything else that’s created the disparities that we’re seeing today.”

In addition to the recommendations, the document details hundreds of years of enslavement, “racial terror and legal segregation” and discrimination that Black people in California and across the country have experienced.

The full implementation of these proposals could cost billions of dollars, according to experts. But at this point, there is no guarantee that all or any of the proposals will be passed by the California State Legislature and signed into law by the governor, nor is there a timetable.

“At its core, the task force’s finding is clear. Reparations for African Americans are appropriate. They are warranted. They are necessary. They are needed,” said California Attorney General Rob Bonta during Thursday’s final meeting. “It’s time for California to begin remedying the debilitating economic, educational, and health hardships uniquely experienced by African Americans – hardships we unequivocally know are the results of centuries of slavery and discrimination.”

During the public comment portion of Thursday’s meeting in Sacramento, speaker thanked the task force members for their yearslong work, recalled memories and names of their ancestors and urged lawmakers to support the proposal.

Attendees also stood up and chanted: “What do we want? Reparations! When do we want it? Now!”.

The state’s Black population includes more than 2.5 million people.

The task force was created in 2020 after California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a bill to establish the panel. Since then, the task force has held numerous public meetings, including more than 28 hours of public comments, and heard from 133 experts and witnesses.

Kamilah Moore, the chairperson of the panel, said she hopes their efforts reinvigorate the Black community to exercise “self-determination with a renewed spirit and energy that enables us to freely determine our political status and to pursue our economic social and cultural development.”

“We have been relegated to the bottom of the caste system in this country,” Moore said, noting that the final report also highlights the unjust treatment of other racial and ethnic groups in the state. “It is also my hope that the task force’s general efforts empowers these groups in their respective advocacy and ultimately strengthens the capacity for cross cultural allyship and movement building.”


June 28, 2023: California’s historic work on possible Black reparations moves to the legislature (AP)

Members of California’s Black reparation task force handed off their historic two-year report to state lawmakers Thursday, beginning the next chapter in the long struggle to compensate descendants of slavery.

The first U.S. panel of its kind met one last time Thursday, urging supporters to press lawmakers into action on more than 100 recommendations. State legislators and Gov. Gavin Newsom must agree for any money to be paid or for any policy changes to be adopted.

“This book of truth will be a legacy, will be a testament to the full story,” said Lisa Holder, a civil rights attorney and task force member. “Anyone who says that they are colorblind, that we have solved th problem of anti-Black animus and racism, I challenge you to read this document.”

The mood was buoyant, but tinged with frustration and anger that hours earlier, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down affirmative action in higher education, programs that have disproportionately helped Black students. Task force member said their suggestions will pass legal muster because the proposed benefits would only go to descendants of enslaved people, not to all Black residents.

The panel narrowly voted to limit any financial redress to residents who can document lineage from Black people who were in the U.S. in the 19th century.

The 1,100-page report details California’s role in perpetuating discrimination against Black residents. Ideas for repairing the harm range from formally apologizing to paying descendants of enslaved people for having suffered under racist actions such as over-policing and housing discrimination. The panel also recommended creating a new agency to oversee reparations efforts.

Turning the proposals into policies won’t be easy. State Sen. Steven Bradford said there are “a lot of folks” in the Legislature who do not support reparations and a 2021 Pew Research Center survey found that only 30% of U.S. adults favored the concept.

A more recent survey by the nonpartisan Public Policy Institute of California found 54% of respondents had a negative opinion of California creating a reparations task force, although 59% said they would support a formal apology from the state to descendants.

More than 200 people gathered at the Thursday meeting in Sacramento, with an overflow crowd outside the room. Inside, many stood at one point and began a call-and-response to demand action.

“What do we want?” someone shouted.

“Reparations,” the crowd responded.

“When do we want them?” he asked.

“Now!”

California Secretary of State Shirley Weber, who wrote legislation creating the task force, said slavery stripped her of her identity and heritage and that she has visited Africa dozens of times, only to conclude there is nowhere for her to go back to.

“I am an American,” she said. “This country has shaped and formed us and we have given to it. And we have a right to be here. We have a right to have the benefits.”

Rev. Amos C. Brown, a longtime civil rights activist and vice-chair of the task force, said California’s projected $31.5 billion budget deficit should not stop the state from making reparations.

“This state has committed a crime against Black folks, and it’s time for them to pay,” Brown said to cheers from the audience. “Deficits don’t last always.”

The nine-member reparations panel convened in June 2021, the year after Newsom signed legislation creating the group. He and legislative leaders picked the members, including lawyers, educators, elected officials and civil rights leaders descended from enslaved people.

Federal reparations efforts have stalled for decades, but cities, counties, school districts and universities have taken up the cause. An advisory group in San Francisco recommended that qualifying Black adults receive a $5 million lump-sum, guaranteed annual income of at least $97,000 and personal debt forgiveness. San Francisco supervisors are supposed to take up the proposals later this year.

New York may soon follow California by creating a commission to examine the state’s involvement in slavery and consider addressing present-day economic and educational disparities experienced by Black people. Lawmakers approved the legislation earlier this month, but Gov. Katny Hochul has yet to sign it.

Illinois approved a reparations commission last year.

California entered the union as a free state in 1850. In practice, it was sanctioned slavery and approved policies and practices that thwarted Black people from owning homes and starting businesses. Black families were terrorized, their committees aggressively policed and their neighborhoods polluted, according to a groundbreaking report released last year as part of the committee’s work.

The panel did not recommend a fixed dollar amount for financial redress, but endorsed economic methodologies to calculate what is owed for decades of over-policing, disproportionate incarceration and housing discrimination. Initial calculations pegged California’s potential cost in those areas at more than $800 billion — more than 2.5 times the state’s annual budget. The estimated cost was cut to $500 billion in a later report, though no explanation was given for the change.

The panel has recommended prioritizing elders for financial compensation.

Economists recommended nearly $1 million for a 71-year-old Black person who lived in California — or $13,600 per year — for health disparities that shorten the average life span.

Black people subjected to aggressive policing and prosecution in the “war on drugs” from 1971 to 2020 could each receive $115,000 if they lived in California throughout that period, or more than $2,300 for each year.

Kamaliah Moore, an intellectual property and entertainment lawyer who led the task force, called the last two year a whirlwind.

“It’s been very work intensive, but also very cathartic and very emotional” she said. “We’re standing in the shoes of our ancestors to finish, essentially, this sacred project.”


June 29, 2023: California Reparations Task Force Unveils Comprehensive Final Proposals to the Legislature Regarding Reparations for African Americans, California Attorney General Bonta reported.

Pursuant to Assembly Bill 3121 (AB 3121), the California Task Force to Study and Develop Reparation Proposals for African Americans (Reparations Task Force) today released its final report and recommendations for redressing the historical atrocities perpetrated against African Americans in California.

The Reparations Task Force, he first initiative of its kind by a state government, spent the past two years documenting how enslavement and its enduring legacy of systematic racism cemented structural inequality and recommended many methods for repairing the resulting harm.

The Reparations Task Force’s final report identifies methodologies for calculating reparations payments to the community of eligibility — descendants of a chattel enslaved person, or descendants of a free Black person living in the United States prior to the end of the 19th Century; and recommends to the Legislature, for its adoption, numerous policy changes directed at redressing each and every aspect of the atrocities perpetuated against African Americans, as well as a formal apology, and a standard curriculum to help make the history of African Americans as well as the Task Force’s findings and recommendations, accessible to people of all ages.

Other components of the report include a survey on the implementation of the California Racial Justice Act, a detailed compendium of state and federal laws and cases impacting the rights of African Americans, and a robust community engagement process undertake at the direction of the Task Force.

“For California to be a leader in the movement for true reparatory justice for African Americans, we must start with accountability. Our nation has for too long overlooked the atrocities visited upon African Americans or cosigned them to vestige of the past.” said Attorney General Bonta. “This final report decisively established that now is the time for California to acknowledge the state’s role in perpetuating these harms, and ensure that through a comprehensive approach to reparations, we commit ourselves to the healing and restoration of our African American residents.”

Enacted on September 30, 2020, AB 3121 tasked the Reparations Task Force with studying the institution of slavery in the United States — including the keeping of enslaved persons and the enforcement of “Fugitive Slave Acts” in California — and how those actions and structures put in place during the enslavement period and thereafter resulted in a system the relentlessly subjugated African Americans.

The report traces this through California’s history into the present and both details the ongoing adverse impacts on living African Americans and presents numerous ideas for policy changes designed to begin the process of repair, with special attention to addressing the specifics injuries to descendants of individuals enslaved in the United States.

The final report consolidates months of hearings, expert testimony, public comments, witness statements, and an array of records and materials submitted to the task force. The report is organized as follows:

Part I details the history of how, 158 years after the abolition of slavery, its badges and incidents remain embedded in the political, legal, health, financial, educational, cultural, environmental, social and economic systems of California and the United States.

Part II discusses the international framework for reparations as established by the United Nations, which requires compensation, restitution, rehabilitation, satisfaction, and guarantees of non-repetition.

Part III offers recommendations as to how the State of California should apologize for the states’ perpetration of gross human rights violations against Africans who were enslaved and their descendants.

Part IV sets forth methods for calculating some aspects of monetary reparations to address: (a) health disparities, (b) disproportionate African American mass incarceration and over-policing, (c) housing discrimination, (d) devaluation of African American businesses; (e) unjust property takings by eminent domain; and (f) labor discrimination.

Part V delineates a broad set of more than 115 recommendations to the Legislature for critically needed law and policy reforms to address and redress the harms set forth in Part 1 and support the other recommendations in the Report.

Part VI includes the results of the DOJ’s survey regarding the implementation of the California racial Justice Act, which could offer a potentially powerful tool for rooting out and addressing bias in the criminal justice system, including charging decisions, convictions, and sentencing.

Part VII includes a report commissioned by the Task Force intended to give the community voice in the conversation concerning reparations, including through listening sessions, collections of personal testimonies and oral histories, and a statewide survey.

Part VIII sets forth the Task Force’s recommendations that the Legislature adopt a standard curriculum centered on the Task Force’s findings and recommendations and that the Legislature fund the development and implementation of age-appropriate curricula across all grade levels.

Part IX contains a compendium of state and federal laws and cases that demonstrate that from the birth of the nation forward, federal and state constitutional provisions, statutes, and court decisions have sanctioned, enabled, and institutionalized discrimination, on the part of government and privacy actors, agains African Americans.


June 29, 2023: California Reparations Task Force Issues Final Report As Black Communities Demand Action TAG24 reported.

The California Reparations Task Force on Thursday issued its final report in a hearing marked by powerful testimonies and urgent demands for legislative action.

Two years of research and community outreach came to a bold conclusion on Thursday as the first-in-the-nation California Reparations Task Force delivered its final report.

Over more than 1,100 pages, the document details the historic injustices perpetrated against Black people at every stage of California’s history.

In a powerful move, Task Force Chair Kamilah Moore listed by name many of the past and present state-sanctioned abused against Black communities in the Golden State, from chattel slavery to redlining, predatory policing, mass incarceration, and more.

“We have been relegated to the bottom of the caste system in this country. Black, African American, American Freedmen, however you want to call us, we are resiliently surviving,” Moore said to cheers and applause from the crowd.

“It is my hope that the task force’s general efforts reinvigorate the Black-American community to exercise our human right to self-determination with renewed spirit and energy that enables us to freely determine our political status and to pursue our economic, social, and cultural development via comprehensive reparatory justice policies.”

California Reparations Task Force issues dozens of policy recommendations

In addition to proving a detailed account of structural racism in California, the final report also includes more than 115 policy recommendations to address ongoing impacts of the historic harms the task force identified.

The proposals include a formula to calculate the minimum amount owed in direct financial compensation, coming out to an estimated $1.2 million for some Black Californians, though the task force said the exact amount should be determined by lawmakers.

In a controversial decision, the California Reparations Task Force in March 2022 voted to limit eligibility to those who can prove their ancestors were enslaved in America during the 19th century or were free Black people living in the US before the 20th century.

California Governor Gavin Newsom has so far refrained from saying whether he will act on the policy proposals, but task force members noted that their report makes the case for repair crystal clear.

“We can now say: America, we know what you did, and we know what you continue to do. We see you. The question is: America, do you see yourself?” said Dr. Cheryl Grills.

“This is a fight for the heart and the soul and the integrity and the authenticity of American society,” she added. “The real work begins now.”

Community members urge California lawmakers to act on reparations

During the public comment period, community members testified to the significance of the task force’s work, describing the process and final product as a turning point following generations of enslavement and disenfranchisement.

Many participants also took the mic to urge state lawmakers to act on the proposals outlined in the report without delay — especially if they want to win the Black vote in future elections.

“Gavin Newsom, you want my support — I know you do — but today, I need yours,” California resident Willie Pickett insisted. “If he’s going to run for another term, he’s going to need our support again.”

Community members overwhelmingly celebrated the blueprint laid out by the task force as a path toward a better future and expressed their determination to keep fighting for the recommendations’ implementation.

“How in the heck are we supposed to resolve the issues that stand with us currently and ahead of us if we continue to shelve problems that are from the past, from years past, continuously, over and over and over again?” asked California labor activist Scott Turner. “Today is the start of breaking that cycle.”


June 29, 2023: California’s reparation report excludes payment plan but is fill of program proposals (NBC News)

California’s highly anticipated reparations report, released Thursday, outline how Black Californians can receive monetary compensation for the harms of slavery and systemic racism.

The task force proposed more than 100 statewide policies to address generations of discrimination and racial disparities. Still, the report does not issue a concrete dollar amount owed to people “who are able to demonstrate that they are the descendant of either an enslaved African American in the United States, or a free African American living in the United States prior to 1900.”

This final report follows a 500-page interim report released last year that detailed the legacy of slavery on California’s Black residents. That report was a scathing indictment of the ways the state was complicit in, and at times an active leader of, “innumerable harms” against the Black community.

The document released Thursday, coming in at nearly 1,100 pages, offers a comprehensive look at ways the U.S. and California wronged descendants of enslaved Black people through racial terror, political disenfranchisement, unequal housing and educational opportunities, and environmental racism, among other harms. It also offers suggestions for issuing a formal apology and implementing a curriculum based on the task force’s findings.

How much money will the state issue to Black Californians?

The task force, in consultation with economists and policy experts, estimated the minimum dollar amount in harm that California has caused or could have prevents, totals at least $1 million per eligible person.

But it’s not so simple — the $1 million figure stems from the task force’s proposed calculation, which could fluctuate. The formula includes dollars lost because of race-based health disparities, mass incarceration, housing discrimination, unjust land seizure and other harms that have had major impacts on Black Californians.

It will be up to the California Legislature to collect data, propose firm reparations amounts and determine who is eligible to receive those payments. The major components of the equation include:

Health Harms

The task force report determined that the difference in life expectancy between Black Americans and white non-Hispanics is due to unequal treatment in the health care system. The report estimates that the loss of value due to health discrimination is $967,000 over a lifetime given the average lifespan of a Black Californian, or around $13,600 per year in California.

Mass Incarceration and Over-Policing

The report also detailed the detrimental effects of the war on drugs on Black life in California from 1971 to 202, which led to mass incarceration and the over-policing of Black communities. Although research shows that all races use and sell illegal drugs at the same rates, the Black community was singled out by police for drug-related arrests.

Therefore, as compensation for excess felony drug arrests and disproportionate prison time, it estimates that Black people who lived in California could be owed at least $115,000 or around $2,300 per year of residency in California from 1971 to 2020.

Housing Discrimination

The report contents that since California’s founding in 1850, state-sanctioned discriminatory housing practices, such as local zoning rules that enforced segregation, have led Black homeownership to be disproportionately lower than white homeownership.

The task force suggests two ways to calculate loss from housing discrimination: calculating the average per capital white-to-Black homeownership wealth gap in 2019, taking into account interest, or calculating losses based on redlining.

Using the first method, the team found that the homeownership gap caused an approximate loss of $120,000 in 2020 dollars. The second method, based on redlining, results in an approximate $162,000 loss in homeownership wealth.

Unjust Property Takings

In addition, discriminatory polices and practices devalued Black-owned businesses and stifled Black entrepreneurial opportunities through lack of access to capital and equity. The task force estimated that Black Californians were able to create 60,000 fewer businesses than Black people in other states. It calculated that the value of the missing number of businesses could total upward of $152.2 billion, or roughly $77,000 per person in California.

Devaluation of Businesses

In addition, discriminatory policies and practices devalued Black-owned businesses and stifled Black entrepreneurial opportunities through lack of access to capital and equity. The task force estimated that Black Californians were able to create 60,000 fewer businesses than Black people in other states. It calculated that the value of the missing number of businesses could total upward of $152.2 billion, or roughly $77,000 per person in California.

Who would be eligible to receive reparations in California?

In short, those first in line for monetary compensation would be people whose ancestors were enslaved in the U.S. or were free Black people living in the U.S. before 1900.

The chair of the reparations task force, Kamaliah Moore, a reparatory justice scholar and attorney, wrote on Twitter about how the report’s release Thursday coincided with the Supreme Court’s divisive decision to strike down race-conscious college admissions.

“Our reparations recommendations are not race-based, but rather are based on lineal descent,” Moore wrote.

What happens next with the legislation recommendations?

The ball is now in the California Legislature’s court.

The task fore provided more than 115 recommendation for “critically needed law and policy reforms” that redress the persistent harms to the Black community from slavery and systemic racism.

Lawmakers will review the recommendations and have the authority to adopt, dismiss or adjust them. Whatever they decide must be approved by both houses before it will be presented to Gov. Gavin Newsom to sign into law.

Task force members shared insight into some of the recommendations at a news conference prior to the report’s official release.

“One of the recommendations is to provide free college tuition at public colleges and universities for descendants of slaves,” Moore said Thursday. “To that end, that recommendation remains unaffected by the SCOTUS decision today because it’s not a race-based admissions preference.”


June 29, 2023: California’s slavery reparations plan: Eligibility, payments and details (Los Angeles Times)

California’s Reparations Task Force on Thursday released its final report, marking a milestone in the state’s historic efforts to consider remedies for slavery.

The task force has spent the last two years hearing testimony from academics, economists and others experts to gather evidence of the effects of slavery and to prove the ways in which government sanctioned policies continued to discriminate against Black people long after slavery was abolished.

The movement now heads back to the state Capitol, where Gov. Gavin Newsom and the California Legislature is expected to begin considering the proposal next year.

Eligibility:

The task force voted to recommend “only those individuals who are able to demonstrate that they are the descendant of either an enslaved African American in the United States, or a free African American living in the United States prior to 1900, be eligible for monetary reparations.

In its compensation models, the task force cited population estimates from 2020 of less than 2 million non-Hispanic African American residents who lived in the state.

The task force recommends that the Legislature create a new California African American Freedmen Affairs Agency dedicated to implementing the task force’s recommendations and ensuring state agencies properly carry out any policies adopted into law. Among those duties could be helping people determine their eligibility. The agency should have a “genealogy branch to support potential reparations claimants by providing access to expert genealogical research to confirm reparations eligibility” according to the final report.

Compensation:

The amounts each individual receives would be determined by the number of years they have resided in California for a minimum of six months of each year during a defined period of harm based on the laws and policies enacted at the time. The money would be given to every eligible recipient and no one would need to provide proof that they have suffered direct harms. The task force also suggested the Legislature adopt an individual claims process to provide reparations for those who can prove particular harms.

The pay models suggest:

Compensation for health disparities: $13,619 for each year of residency from 1850 to 2020. This figure was derived by comparing life expectancy between Black non-Hispanic and white non-Hispanic Californians.

Compensation for mass incarceration and over policing of African Americans: $2,352 for each year of residency in California during the war on drugs from 1971 to 2020.

Compensation for housing discrimination: $3,378 for each year between 1933 and 1977 spent as a resident of the state of California.

The proposal calls for additional compensation for unjust property takings by eminent domain and the devaluation of African American businesses, which the Legislature would qualify.

The task force recommended that the Legislature provide initial down payments to begin the process, with more payments to follow, and prioritize the elderly as the first in line for compensation.

Policy Change:

The task force also recommended changing existing law and adopting new policies to provide reparatory justice and ensure that the state does not repeat harms. Some of those recommendations include:

Repeal or amend Proposition 209, a measure approved by California voters that banned affirmative action in 1996.

Analyze laws, policies and ordinances from the local to the state level for racial impact prior to passage and after implementation.

Amend the California Constitution to prohibit involuntary servitude.

Pay fair marker value for jail and prison labor.

Abolish the death penalty.

Fund community wellness centers in African American communities.

Strengthen the Bane Act by eliminating the requirement that a victim of police violence show that the officer “specifically intended” to commit misconduct.

Declare Election Day a paid state holiday.

Restore voting rights to all formerly and currently incarcerated people.

Implement rent caps for historically redlined ZIP Codes.

Increase grants and financial assistance to improve homeownership rates among African Americans, including subsidized down payments and mortgage payments to those who reside in formerly redlined neighborhoods.

Provide tax relief by allowing defendants who reside in formerly redlined neighborhoods to transfer the assessed value other primary home to a newly purchased or constructed primary residence.

Provide free tuition to state public colleges for all California residents eligible for monetary reparations.

Identify and remove Confederate monuments, markers and memorials.

Create a guaranteed income program for descendants of an enslaved person.

Automatically increase minimum wage on a regular basis to adjust for increases to the cost of living, including inflation.

Provide interest-free loans to owners of small businesses in African American commercial areas.

End the cash bail system.

Repeal the “three strikes” law.

Adopt universal single-payer healthcare coverage and a healthcare cost control system.

Increase Medi-Cal reimbursement rates to match reimbursement rates of private insurance.


July 3, 2023: California budgets up to $12 million for reparations bills, a milestone for racist legacy (AP)

California plans to spend up to $12 million on reparations legislation under a budget signed by Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, marking a milestone in the state’s efforts to atone for a legacy of racism and discrimination against Black Californians.

The reparations funding in the $297.9 billion budget Newsom signed over the weekend does not specify what programs the money would go toward. Lawmakers are not considering widespread direct payments to Black Californians this year.

The state legislature is weighing proposals to issue a formal apology for California’s role in perpetuating discrimination against Black residents, to create an agency to administer reparations programs, and to identify families whose property was unjustly seized through eminent domain.

The funding comes after federal reparations efforts have stalled for decades.

“We often say the budget is a reflection of our values and our priorities, so the fact that there’s any money for reparations should be a reason for celebrating,” said state Sen. Steven Bradford, a Los-Angeles-area Democrat, noting he hoped the allocation would have been larger.

No state has gotten further along in its consideration of reparations proposals for Black residents than California, but some have made significant strides. Illinois and New York passed laws in recent years to study reparations proposals for African Americans. Florida passed a law in the 1990s creating a college scholarship fund for descendants of Black residents who were killed in a 1923 massacre initiated by a white mob.

But some opponents of reparations proposals being considered by lawmakers in California say taxpayers should not have to pay to address policies and practices from a long time ago.

“Slavery was a stain on our nation’s history, but I don’t believe it’s fair to right the wrongs on the past at the expense of the people today who did nothing wrong,” Assembly Republican Leader James Gallagher said in a statement. “More than a quarter of Californians are immigrants — how can we look at those people, who are struggling as it is, and say it’s on them to make up for something that happened more than 150 years ago?”

Senate President Pro Tempore Mike McGuire, a Democrat, said at an event Monday that “the $12 million is not nearly enough” but that lawmakers worked closely to secure the money during a tough budget year.

It could cost the state between $3 million and $5 million annually to run the reparations agency, according to an estimate reported by the Assembly Committee on Appropriations. The Legislature hasn’t released an estimate cost to implement the eminent domain bill, but the Senate Appropriations Committee said it could cost the state hundreds of thousands of dollars to investigate claims by families who say their land was taken because of racially discriminatory motives.

Bradford introduced proposals to give property tax and housing assistance to descendants of enslaved Black people, but those were blocked in May by a key committee.

Kamaliah Moore, who chaired a first-in-the-nation state reparations task force, was disappointed that lawmakers also did not introduce legislation this year to provide free tuition at public colleges for descendants of enslaved Black people, which the group recommended in its final report.

But Moore said it was still “good news” to see $12 million for reparations included in the budget as a starting point.

“It means that they’re taking accountability and responsibility, and they’re acknowledging that harms and the atrocities to this particular population,” she said. “That’s a huge step that should not be overlooked.”


July 6, 2023: The California reparations task force last week concluded two years of hard work with a 1,100 page, comprehensive report that details the harms of slavery on Black people from California, recommendations of financial compensation and the creation of myriad programs and policies to redress the historical wrongs. NBC News reported.

The report – compiled through exhaustive research by politicians, historians and economists and swayed by comments from the community over 12 public hearings – is encyclopedic in size. It has been hailed by task force members as a blueprint for other sates to follow in the pursuit of reparations.

For two task force members, that was the easy part. A daunting challenge now lies ahead.

Sen. Steven Bradford and Assemblyman Reggie Jones-Saywer are also members of the California Legislature, which has been charged with digesting the report and finalizing recommendations to be submitted to Gov. Gavin Newsom to sign into law. The really hard part for Bradford and Jones-Sawyer will be garnering their colleagues’ support for reparations.

The difficulty is not lost on the two veteran politicians whose presence for two years on the task force gives them unparalleled insight for the upcoming battle.

“Absolutely, it will not be easy,” Jones-Sawyer said. “But we are up for the fight.”

Step one: Getting all the state Assembly members to read the full report – presented in hardback form – That alone could be a substantial hurdle to clear, Bradford said.

“I believe the completeness of the report will have an impact – if they read it.” he told NBC News. “And that’s the big challenge, making sure all my colleagues read it. Even in reading it, you have to believe it, you have to accept it and then you have to be willing to change your hearts and minds.”

The depth of this report called “a book of truth,” by task force member Lisa Holder, makes a thorough case for reparations as a way to make amends for California’s role in oppressing Black people through the remnants, policies, attitude and discrimination of slavery. The recommendations in the final report provide the “scholarly foundation,” task force member Don Tamaki said, to advance reforms in health care, housing, criminal justice, education and other areas “with continuing, persistent racial disparities.” Task force members believe the power of the report will be significant.

“In looking at this, you have to first admit the wrongs, and that’s the first challenge we have,” Bradford said. “And then it’s about coming up with real atonement, real policies that help address some of the harms done to Black people in California.”

He described the “appetite” for reparations among assemblymembers as “tempered at best.” He pointed out that while states such as Tennessee, Alabama and others voted last year to remove slavery and indentured servitude as penalty for crimes from their state Constitutions, the California Assembly failed to even vote on a similar measure.

Rather, state lawmakers squashed an amendment to remove “indentured servitude.”

“We still have it in our Constitution,” Bradford said. “We had colleagues who didn’t want to take that vote. So, by no stretch of the imagination do I believe this will be a cakewalk. It’s going to require some real massaging and networking, working our colleagues to get them to first read the report, accept what’s there and tackle legislation to address this.”

Task force members are championing their colleagues’ ability to get things done.

Tamaki said Bradford and Jones-Sawyer “understand they have the heavy burden of leading the process of transforming the recommendations into bills … But they are two highly experienced legislators with a lifetime of expertise in much of the subject matter addressed in the final report. Not only are they well connected with their legislative colleagues, both served as the chair of the Legislative Black Caucus, which will be crucial in leading this effort.”

He pointed out that support outside of the state Assembly – from citizens and organizations – will be paramount, as well. To that end, more than 330 organizations have endorsed the work of the task force and call for reparations, including mainstream organizations such as the Bar associations for the counties of Los Angeles, San Francisco, Sacramento, and Alameda, the California Wellness Foundation and the Weingart Foundation, the National Urban League, the NAACP and many other groups from the social services, civil rights, faith, academic and other sectors.

Because of the detail of the report and the involved discussion around it, Bradford said, an agreement on legislation for Newsom to consider likely would not come until next year. Cheryl Grills, a clinical psychologist and task force member, said that between now and then, Bradford and Jones-Sawyer will need help from the people to help influence the Legislature.

“This is a fight for the heart and soul and the integrity and the authenticity of American society,” she said. “So the real work begins now. And it’s not just up to our legislators. Community, it’s your turn at bat. We need you at bat to monitor, to inform and to impress upon your Legislature and your neighbors, your larger community that the work of retribution, the work of reparations is the work of American society – and any diminishment of recommendations for repair will not be accepted.”


July 7, 2023: The California Task Force to Study and Develop Reparation Proposals for African Americans delivered its final report to the California Legislature two days before the July 1 deadline, The Observer reported.

The nine-member committee submitted a 1075-page, brown-and-gold hardcover book with a comprehensive reparations plan that includes more than 115 recommendations and a survey. Published by the California Department of Justice, the report documents the harms enslaved ancestors of Black Californians experienced during chattel slavery and due to the Jim Crow laws that followed. It also details the history of discriminatory state polices in California.

Attorney Kamilah V. Moore, the task force chairperson, provided a summary of the group’s activities over the last two years leading up to the compilation of the first-in-the-nation report addressing the effects of slavery.

“As you all know, this illustrious nine-member California reparations task Force has been working diligently over a course of two years, not only to study the enumerable atrocities against the African American community with special considerations for those who are descendants of persons in slavery in the United States,” Moore said.

“Obviously, we’ve been working diligently to develop our numerous policy prescriptions to end what we consider to be lingering badges of slavery in California as well,” Moore added.

Ironically, the Task Force’s last meeting happened the day the U.S. Supreme Court prohibited the use of race-based affirmative action in college admissions. A couple of task force members addressed the decision before the meeting by stayed focused on the release of the report.

Each page of the report offers an explanation of reparations, evidence of past aggressions and systemic racism, and recommendations for restitution and atonement.

The report is 40 chapters, beginning with an Introduction; followed by evidence of Enslavement; Racial Terror; Political Disenfranchisement; Housing Segregation; Separate and Unequal Education; Racism in the Environment and Infrastructure; Pathologizing the African American Family; Control Over Creative, Cultural, and Intellectual Life; Stolen Labor; and Hindered Opportunity.

“I would like to commend Governor Gavin Newsom for making this Task Force a reality, Secretary of State Shirley Weber for authoring the legislation creating this Task Force, and each and every Member of the Reparations Task Force who have worked tirelessly over the past two years,” said Assemblywoman Lori Dr. Wilson, Chair of the California Legislative Black Caucus in a statement.

“The findings are clear. Lawmakers must take direct and determinative action to address the vast racial inequality which exists in California today. The California Legislative Black Caucus looks forward to partnering with the Newsom administration and our colleagues in the Legislative as we look towards the coming Legislative Session.”

Additionally, recommendations made by the task force include a request for a formal apology from the state and acknowledgment of discrimination against the descendants of enslaved Blacks.

“This work has been relentless, has been meticulous (and) it is unsaleable,” Oakland-based civil rights attorney and task force member Lisa Holder said. “It has been a work of a collective. We partnered with their Department of Justice, we partnered with hundreds of scholars, and we partnered with the community. Public commenters and participants in listening sessions who poured out their hearts and souls told us some of the most devastating stories of racial discriminations. They shared their pain and made themselves vulnerable during this process.”

The task forces decided on March 30, 2022, that lineage will determine who will be eligible for compensation, specifically, individuals who are Black descendants of enslaved people in the United States. If reparations become law, a proposed California American Freedmen Affairs Agency would be responsible for identifying past harms and preventing future occurrences.

The specialized office, with additional branches across the state, would facilitate claims for restitution, process claims with the state, and assist claimants in proving eligibility through a “genealogy” department.

Marcus Champion, a board member of the National Assembly of American Slavery Descendants Los Angeles (NAASDLA) and the Coalition for a Just and Equitable California (CJEC), is a longtime reparations supporter and one of the activists who worked with Secretary of State Shirley N. Webber when she was an assembly member to make Assembly Bill (AB) 3121, the law that established the task force, a reality.

Speaking at a CJEC gathering in North Sacramento after the final task force meeting, Champion said now is the time to persuade the legislature to make reparations law.

“For us, on the ground as grassroots (organizations), we are about to start putting pressure on the legislators to make sure that the words are right,” Champion told California Black Media. “We’re about to make sure the community’s eligibility is right, make sure that there are cash payments, and make sure that this is not watered down and that this is real reparations.”

The 16th and final Task Force meeting was held in the First Floor Auditorium of the March Fong Eu Secretary of State Building in Sacramento in June 29. The facility was filled with an overflow of people waiting in the lobby and outside of the building.

All nine members of the task force were present as well as some of the speakers who testified before the panel over the last two years. California Attorney General Rob Bonta, members of the California Legislative Black Caucus, and Weber also spoke during the three-hour event.

“The policies and laws of this nation have affected every state and many instances beyond the state. It’s important to let people know that reparation is due whether you’re in Mississippi or you’re in California,” Weber said. “Reparation is due because the harm that has been done. And we need to begin to repair the harm and stop patching it up as we’ve done for many years.”


September 10, 2023: Los Angeles Times (via Yahoo! News) posted: “New Poll Finds California voters resoundingly oppose cash reparations for slavery”

California voters oppose the idea of the state offering cash payments to the descendants of enslaved African Americans by a 2-to-1 margin, according to the results of a new poll that foreshadows the political difficulty ahead next year when state lawmakers begin to consider reparations for slavery.

The UC Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies poll – co-sponsored The Times, found that 59% of voters oppose cash payments compared with 28% who support the idea. The lack of support for cash reparations was resounding, with more than 4 in 10 voters “strongly” opposed.

“It has a steep uphill climb, at least from the public’s point of view,” said Mark DiCamillo, director of the IGS poll.

Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom and state lawmakers created California’s Reparation Task Force in 2020 with the goal of establishing a path to reparations that could serve as a model for the nation. After two years of deliberations, the task force sent a final report and recommendations this summer to the state Capitol, where Newsom and the Democratic-led Legislature will ultimately decide how the state should atone for slavery.

The group suggested providing cash payments to all descendants based on health disparities, mass incarceration and over-policing and housing discrimination that have adversely affected Black residents compared with white Californians.

The remedies recommended in the report also go far beyond cash payments and include policies to end the death penalty, pay fair market value for jail and prison labor, restore voting rights to all formerly and currently incarcerated people and apply rent caps to historically redlined ZIP Codes that disadvantaged Black residents, among dozens of other suggestions.

The conclusion of the task force’s work places political pressure on Democrats to deliver on a process they started, but the unpopularity of cash payments suggests they’ll face strong political head winds.

State Sen. Steven Bradford (D-Gardena), who served on the task force, said he wasn’t surprised by the poll results.

“It speaks to the miseducation of most Americans when it comes to slavery and the impact that it had on this country and the impact that it still has on African Americans today,” Bradford said.

The amount of cash reparations that could be paid to eligible descendants would vary greatly, but nevertheless has been the primary focus of critics.

For health disparities, the task force recommends $13,619 for each year of residency in California – a figure that was derived by comparing life expectancy between Black non-Hispanic and white non-Hispanic Californians.

To compensate for mass incarceration and over-policing, the task force recommends eligible descendants receive $2,352 for each year of residency in California during the war on drugs from 1971 to 2020.

Compensation for housing discrimination totaled $3,378 for each year between 1933 and 1977 that a descendant resided in California.

When asked about his stance on the proposal in the spring, Newsom said reparations are more than just cash payments. He reiterated that position in mid-June when interviewed by Fox News host Sean Hannity, and noted that coverage of recommendations by Fox News seized on cash payments and “ran with that over and over and over again.”

It doesn’t have to be in the frame of writing check; reparations comes in many different forms. But one cannot deny these historical facts, and I really believe very strongly we have to come to grips with what’s happened,” Newsom told Hannity.

Newsom has enjoyed broad support among Black voters and, given the overall opposition to cash reparations by most Californians, any action the governor takes on the issue could carry substantial political risk.

In the Berkeley poll, when voters who oppose reparations were asked why, the two main reasons cited most often were that “it’s unfair to ask today’s taxpayers to pay for wrongs committed in the past,” picked by 60% of voters, and “it’s not fair to single out one group for reparations when other racial and religious groups have been wronged in the past,” chosen by 53%.

Only 19% said their reason was that the proposal would cost the state too much, suggesting that money alone is not the main objection.

Among Democrats, 43% favored and 41% opposed cash reparations. Republicans were strongly against the proposal at 90% with only 5% in favor. Independents were 65% opposed and 22% in favor.

Black California voters were more likely to support cash payments than any other demographic, with 76% in favor and 16% opposed, the survey found. Almost two-thirds of white voters were opposed, the survey found. Almost two-thirds of white voters were opposed as were 6 in 10 Latino and Asian voters.

The success or failure of the reparations in California, where state government is controlled by Democrats and voters are relatively liberal compared with other states, is being watched as a potential bellwether for the movement across the country.

DiCamillo said the poll results showed a dichotomy that could suggest Californians may be open to reparations in different forms.

Despite widespread opposition to cash payments, 60% of the overall respondents said they thought that the legacy of slavery is affecting the state’s Black residents today. Another 31% said there’s no impact at all.

“The idea of cash reparations is really what’s being strongly opposed,” DiCamillo said. “There could be other solutions that could be much more warmly received.”

Members of the reparations task force previously said convincing non-Black Californians that the harms from slavery are still persisting today could be one of the biggest challenges for proponents.

Much of the testimony from academics, economists and other experts to gather evidence of the effects of slavery and to prove the ways in which government-sanctioned policies discriminated against Black people long after slavery was abolished.

Assemblymember Reggie Jones-Sawyer (D-Los Angeles) called the response to the question about lasting harms “a positive sign.” He also repeated the idea that the report offers many more recommendations beyond cash payments.

“I encourage all Californians to read the online report and learn about the history and conclusions made and view the historic and empirical data behind the final report,” he said in a statement. “I believe attitudes will shift when the public is fully aware of what the report has to say.”

Voters shared mixed opinions about whether the state is doing enough to ensure that is Black residents have a fair chance to succeed.

Statewide, 29% of voters said California is doing too little, while 26% said it is doing about the right amount; 22% said the state is doing too much. Nearly 1 in 4 or 23% had no opinion.

The Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies poll surveyed 6,030 registered California voters online in English and Spanish from Aug. 24-29.

Because the survey results are weighted to match census and voter registration benchmarks, estimates the margin of error may be imprecise; however, the results are estimated to have a margin of error of 2 percentage points in either direction for the full sample.


September 12, 2024: First-in-the nation reparations bills are headed to Newsom’s desk, but not without some tension (CapRadio.org)

It’s a hot morning on the Capitol lawn just days after the legislative session and several advocacy groups that represent people who have been incarcerated are kicking off their next big push: A campaign for a November ballot measure.

“Slavery is inconsistent with California values,” Carmen-Nicole Cox with the ACLU California Action said to the crowd from a podium. “And even still, slavery is alive and well in detention and penal faculties across our great state.”

She was speaking at a rally in favor of Proposition 6, which would end forced labor in state prisons. It was part of a successful suite of reparations bills.

Two failed bills that would’ve helped advance the state’s reparation plan are also grabbing attention, and Cox said voters are watching.

“We absolutely vote people in because we believe that they are going to advance certain policy, and then when they show us that they won’t, we get to vote again,” she said.

California might soon make some of the first steps in the country towards reparations for descendants of enslaved persons. Lawmakers know the stakes are high for their own state and the nation, but not everyone agrees on how to get there.

The state responded to protests and calls for racial justice in 2020 with a reparations task force. Last year, that group came back with an over 1,000-page report.

Secretary of State Shirley Webber initiated that work. She told reporters when the report came out that she believes California could make moves that other states — and even the federal government — can’t.

“This effort had been tried many times at the federal level, but because of the complexity of the politics of this nation and its resistance to any kind of change or activity with regards to African Americans, it had failed many times,” she said.

The California Legislative Black Caucus released a list of priority bills based on the report back in January.

Assembly member Corey Jackson (D-Riverside) is a member of the Black Caucus and says he’s proud of how many of those bills succeeded.

“For the first time in the nation, we have a series of bills going to the governor’s desk that provides reparations for African Americans,” he said.

Eight of the 14 bills passed. One calls for the state to make an official apology for its role in slavery. Another mandates it investigate claims of stolen property via eminent domain.

The bills touch on a lot of things, including education, health and criminal justice. Jackson said that might not be what people expect — the package doesn’t include direct cash payments. But it is in line with the steps the task force laid out. Those are based on an United Nation’s legal framework and research on several reparations efforts from around the world.

“The first one is to acknowledge that a harm has been done. The second is to apologize for that harm,” he said.

He says these bills put those ideas into motion, and that’s a big win. But there is tension in what passed and what didn’t.

Two bills that were introduced later failed at the last minute. One Senate Bill 1403, would have established a new government department to carry out reparations laws and another, Senate Bill 1331, would create a reparations fund but not with money from the state.

Jackson said that with although those steps are in the report, the caucus wanted to move more gradually.

State Senator Steven Bradford (D-Gardena) is also a member of the Black Caucus and one of two lawmakers who serve on the task force. He sponsored both bills.

“I think they were critically important to the overall movement of reparations and being able to do something concrete right now,” he said.

The bills enjoyed broad support in votes on the state senate and assembly floors. The entire Black Caucus even co-sponsored one — SB 1403. But both were pulled on the last night of the legislative session.

Caucus members have given various explanations as to why. Caucus Chair Lori Wilson told reporters that evening that the bills weren’t ready, and added that the funding for them, especially the department, wasn’t there, considering its a tight year for the state budget.

Bradford said Governor Gavin Newsom’s office approached the caucus with amendments SB 1403 in the last week of the session. The governor’s team refused to comment on the bills or confirm that it had suggested any changes.

A few dozen protestors, largely from reparations advocacy groups, gathered to protest in the rotunda of the Capitol as the bills were scrapped. Their voices carried to the Assembly floor throughout the night, though they were not allowed into the gallery.

Bradford also said he hears from lawmakers in other states who are looking to California as a model.

“There are going to be those critics who are already talking that say ‘Hey, a state as so-called Progressive as California can’t get it done. How are you going to get it done in some of the more conservative states? he said.

It’s his last year in the Senate, and Bradford said he wants to leave a workable roadmap behind.


September 26, 2024: California will apologize for slavery as part of reparations push (Cal Matters)

California’s governor signed a slate of bills today aimed at beginning the process of reparations for Black descendants of enslaved people, including a measure that requires the state to apologize for perpetuating slavery.

The headliner bill signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom requires officials to sign and display a plaque in the state Capitol that includes the following “the State of California apologize for perpetuating the harms African Americans faced by having imbued racial prejudice through segregation, public and private discrimination, and unequal disbursal of state and federal funding and decades that such actions shall not be repeated.”

Newsom, Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas, Senate leader Mike McGuire and state Supreme Court Chief Justice Patricia Guerrero are all named on the official apology.

“The State of California accepts responsibility for the role we played in promoting, facilitating and permitting the institution of slavery, as well as its enduring legacy of persistent racial disparities,” the governor said in a statement. “Building on decades of work, California is now taking another important step forward in recognizing the grave injustices of the past — and making amends for the harms caused.”

California joins a half-dozen states, including Alabama and Florida, in issuing such a formal apology.

“This is a monumental achievement born from a two-year academic study of the losses suffered by Black Americans in California due to systemic bigotry and racism,” said Assemblymember Reggie Jones-Sawyer, who authored the apology bill and also served on the California Reparations Task Force. “Healing can only begin with an apology. The State of California acknowledges its past actions and is taking this bold step to correct them, recognizing its role in hindering the pursuit of life, liberty, and happiness for Black individuals through racially motivated punitive laws.”

Slavery wasn’t officially legal in California, but was tolerated in the state’s early history. The formal apology was one of more than 100 recommendations made in a 2023 report by a California task force on reparations for the effects of slavery. The pane found that discriminatory laws and unlawful property seizures contributed to significant gaps in wealth, education, and health for generations of Black Californians. The task force recommended direct cash payments for descendants to repair the damage, but so far, the Legislature has not taken up that recommendation.

The California Legislative Black Caucus advanced 14 priority bills in January, including a proposal to provide financial aid for communities harmed by discrimination, another requiring the state to examine banned books in prisons, and another that would protect the right to wear “natural and protective” hairstyles in all competitive sports.

Newsom signed six of those 14 bills, but advocates have described many of them as only symbolic, noting that California political leaders have shied away from enacting more substantial reparations legislation.

A spokesperson for Newsom on Friday stressed that “the governor can only sign measures into law that arrive at his desk.” Some of the bills from the 14-bill reparations package weren’t passed by the Legislature, and another is a constitutional amendment going before voters in November. Black Caucus members also touted other equity bills that Newsom signed Thursday but were not in their original reparations package.

On Wednesday, Newsom vetoes two of the Black Caucus’ slate of bills. One would have created a process for Black families to file a claim with the state if they believed the government seized their property through eminent domain due to discriminatory motives and without providing fair compensation. The other would have required Medi-Cal, the state’s public health insurance plan, to cover relevant and medically supportive foods or nutrition interventions when deemed necessary by a healthcare provider.

Newsom said he vetoed the eminent domain bill, SB 1050 by Sen. Steven Bradford, because the state agency to carry out its provisions doesn’t exist. “I thank the author for his commitment to redressing past racial injustice,” Newsom wrote in his veto message.

Still, the governor’s vetoes were dealt another blow to the years-long effort to help the state of California atone for its racist past, an effort being watched nationwide.

It followed what reparations advocates described as a crushing defeat last month. In the final hours of the legislative session, Black lawmakers blocked two reparation bills – one that would have created an agency to review reparations claims, including those of injustice property takings, and another that would have created the fund for future reparations payments. Newsom’s office declined to comment on those bills, saying the governor does no typically comment on pending legislation.

The caucus cited concerns that the Legislature would not have enough oversight over the agency’s operations. Assemblymember Lori Wilson, the caucus chairperson, declined to comment on the reparations fund bill because it wasn’t part of the caucus’s priority package.

The bills were blocked after Newsom’s administration pushed for the bill to create the agency that would have evaluated claims of unjust property takings to be changed. The proposed changes, which Bradford rejected, would have allocated $6 million to the California State University system to study how to implement the reparations task force’s recommendations, according to a document with proposed amendments.

The Alliance for Reparations, Reconciliation, and Truth, a coalition of Black power-building and justice groups in California, issued a statement expressing disappointment in Newsom’s veto of SB 1050.

“While SB 1050 and other important measures failed this session, we acknowledge the complexities of the current fiscal and political environment and remain committed to advocating for meaningful and impactful progress. We urge our community and allies to remain steadfast,” the group wrote.

The Coalition for a Just and Equitable California also expressed frustration with Newsom’s veto.

“The decision is yet another example of political leaders paying lip service to reparative justice while cowering in the face of true reparative action,” the group’s statement read. The group noted the legislation passed with more than 70 votes in the 80-member Assembly and 37 votes in the 40 member Senate and called on the Legislature to override Newsom’s veto.

“SB 1050 was not just a bill; it was a lifeline to families who have suffered generational harm due to wrongful property seizures. The veto sends a message that the state is unwilling to confront the full breadth of its historical injustices,” the coalition wrote in a written statement.

In a statement, Wilson called the bills signed by Newsom “a meaningful foundation to address the historic injustices faced by Black Californians,” but added: “This is a multi-year effort, and I look forward to continuing our partnership with the Governor on this important work in the years to come as we push toward lasting justice and equity.”


January 31, 2024: The Hill reported “California set to become first state to introduce series of reparation bills”

The California Black Caucus (CLBC) announced 14 reparations bills Wednesday that it plans to introduce as the first step to implement policy proposals outlined in a report released last summer by the Reparations Task Force.

In a press release, the caucus describe the “2024 Reparations Priority Bill Package” as a “multi-year effort to implement the legislative recommendations in the report.”

In introducing the 14 measures, California will become the first state to implement concrete legislative proposals to enact reparations, a movement that has been growing in recent years.

“While many only associate direct cash payments with reparations the true meaning of the word, to repair, involves much more! As laid out in the report, we need a comprehensive approach to dismantling the legacy of slavery and systemic racism,” CLBC Chair Lori Wilson said in the press release.

“This year’s legislative package tackles a wide range of issues; from criminal justice reforms to property rights to education, civil rights and food justice. The Caucus is looking to make strides in the second half of this legislative session as we build towards righting the wrongs of California’s past in future sessions,” Wilson added.

Among the proposals is an amendment to the California Constitution to “allow the State to fund programs for the purpose of increasing the life expectancy of, improving educational outcomes for, or lifting out of poverty specific groups.”

Another amendment would “prohibit involuntary servitude for incarcerated persons.”

One measure addresses “property takings,” and one would allow for the restoration of “property taken during race-based uses of eminent domain to its original owners or provide another effective remedy where appropriate, such as restitution or compensation.”

The first step in laying out the package will be “a resolution that recognizes that harm and a subsequent bill that requests a formal apology by the Governor and the Legislature for the role that the State played in the human rights violation and crimes against humanity on African Slaves and their descendants.”

The 14 measures are categorized under primary topics: Education, Civil Rights, Criminal Justice Reform, Health, and Business.

Education proposals include creating grants to increase enrollment in STEM-related career and technical education programs at high school and college levels. One measure also proposes “career education financial aid for redlined communities.”

In addition to addressing poverty, the civil rights proposals would include, for example, extending the CROWN Act to prohibit discrimination based on certain hairstyles, explicitly in competitive sports.

Criminal justice reform proposals would eliminate the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) practice of banning books without proper oversight, restrict solitary confinement within CDCR detention facilities, and establish grants to fund community-driven solutions to decrease violence at the family, school and neighborhood levels.

Health measures would require advance notice to community stakeholders before grocery stores shut down in underserved or a at-risk communities, and another would “make medically supportive food and nutrition interventions, when deemed medically necessary.”

The sole business proposal would eliminate barriers to those obtaining occupational licenses for people with criminal records.

The California secretary of state praised the announcement, writing: “I am optimistic and encouraged by the work, and look forward to amazing and ground breaking outcomes. The nation is waiting for us to lead. And as California always does, we will lead in addressing a delayed justice called Reparations.”

Assemblymember and task force member Reggie Jones-Sawyer said in a statement: “We will endeavor to right the wrongs committed against black communities through laws and policies to restrict and alienate African Americans.”


January 31, 2024: California Legislative Black Caucus Introduces 2024 Reparations Legislative Package was introduced in a press release:

Today, the California Legislative Black Caucus announced the planned introduction of the 2024 Reparations Priority Bill Package. With the release of the historic Reparations Task Force Report last summer, the Caucus has announced its first step in what will be a multi-year effort to implement the legislative recommendations in the report.

“While many only associate direct cash payments with reparations the true meaning of the word, to repair, involves much more! As laid out in the report, we need a comprehensive approach to dismantling the legacy of slavery and systemic racism,” said Assemblywoman Lori D. Wilson, Chair of the California Legislative Black Caucus. “This year’s legislative package tackles a wide range of issues; from criminal justice reforms to property rights to education, civil rights, and food justice. The Caucus is looking to make strides in the second half of this legislative session as we build towards righting the wrongs of California’s past in future sessions.”

One of the most powerful aspects of the Reparations Tasks Force Report was the detailed discussion of how laws in California were crafted to directly cause harm to its Black residents. That harm touched every aspect of their lives and many of those harms are still felt by Black Californians generations later. This is why the Caucus’ first step will be to introduce a resolution that recognizes that harm and a subsequent bill that requests a former apology by the Governor and the Legislature for the role that the State played in the human rights violation and crimes against humanity on African Slaves and their descendants.”

“As a result of the historic study by the California Reparations Task Force on the negative impacts of Jim Crow-styled laws brought to California, the California Legislative Black Caucus (CLBC) will present its first set of bills based upon the recommendations set forth in the Task Force’s final report.

We will endeavor to right the wrongs committed against black communities through laws and policies designed to restrict and alienate African Americans. These atrocities are found in education, access to homeownership, and to capital for small business startups, all of which contributed to the denial of generational wealth over hundreds of years,” said Assemblymember Reginald Bryon Jones-Sawyer, Sr. “As a member of the Reparations Taskforce, I am proud of the two-year study that resulted in two separate reports totaling over 1,600 pages. These reports contain the most comprehensive empirical data and historical evidence ever collected on the issue of chattel slavery. There is no doubt about the far-reaching negative impacts of bigoted laws born from the end of slavery in our country.

Hundreds of legislative and budgetary reparatory recommendations were made within the final report and I, along with members of the Black Caucus, look forward to working with our legislative colleagues to achieve true reparations and justice for all black Californians.”

Secretary of State, Dr. Shirley Weber, responded to the release by saying, “As the author of AB 3121, I am pleased that the California Legislative Black Caucus has picked up the baton and is moving the state. forward in addressing the recommendations delivered to them seven months ago. I am optimistic and encouraged by the work, and look forward to amazing and ground breaking outcomes. The nation is waiting for us to lead. And as California always does, we will lead in addressing a delayed called Reparations.”

The following 14 measures have been or will be introduced from the noted authors with the full caucus as coauthors. This will represent the 2024 CLBC Reparation Priority Bill Package. For information on each measure, please reach out to the respective legislators’ office.

EDUCATION

  • AB 1929 (McKinnon) – Expand access to career technical education by creating a competitive grant program to increase enrollment of descendants in STEM-related CTE programs at the high school and college levels.
  • AB XXX (McCarty) – Career Education Financial Aid for redlined communities

CIVIL RIGHTS

  • ACA (Jackson) – Amends the California Constitution to allow the State to fund programs for the purpose of increasing life expectancy of, improving educational outcomes for, or lifting out of poverty specific groups.
  • ACR 135 (Weber) – Formally recognizes and accepts responsibility for all of the harms and atrocities committed by representatives of the state who promoted, facilitated, enforced, and permitted the institution of chattel slavery.
  • AB 1815 (Weber) – Prohibit discrimination based on natural and protective hairstyles in all competitive sports by extending the CROWN Act to explicitly include competitive sports within California.
  • SB XXX(Bradford) – Property takings: Restore property taken during race-based uses of eminent domain to its original owners or provide another effective remedy where appropriate, such as restitution or compensation.
  • AB XXX (Jones-Sawyer) – Issues a formal apology for human rights violations and crimes against humanity on African slaves and their descendants.

CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM

  • ACA 8 (Wilson) – Amend the California Constitution to prohibit involuntary servitude for incarcerated persons.
  • AB 1986 (Bryan) – Eliminate the CDCR practice of banning books without oversight and review.
  • AB XXX (Jones-Sawyer) – Fund community-driven solutions to decrease community violence at the family, school and neighborhood levels in African-American communities by establishing a state-funded grant program.
  • AB XXX (Holden) – Mandela Act: Restricts solitary confinement within CDCR detention facilities.

HEALTH

  • AB 1975 (Bonta) – Make medically supportive food and nutrition interventions, when deemed medically necessary by healthcare providers, a permanent part of Medi-Cal benefits in California.
  • SB XXX (Smallwood-Cuevas) – Address food injustice by requiring advance notification to community stakeholders prior to the closure of a grocery store in underserved or at-risk communities.

BUSINESS

  • AB XXX (Gipson) – Eliminate barriers to licensure for people with criminal records. Expansion of AB 2138 to prioritize African American applicants seeking occupational licenses, especially those who are descendants.

A Press Conference with full details of each proposal will occur after February’s bill introduction deadline. A Media Advisory will be issued at least 48 hours in advance of the Press Conference.


January 31: California State lawmakers introduced a slate of reparations bills on Wednesday, including a proposal to restore property taken by “race-based” cases of eminent domain and a potentially unconstitutional measure to provide state funding for “specific groups” Politico reported.

The package marks a first-in-the-nation effort to give restitution to Black Americans who have been harmed by centuries of racist policies and practices. California’s legislative push is the culmination of years of research and debate, including 111-pages of recommendations issued last year by a task force.

Other states like Colorado, New York, and Massachusetts have commissioned reparation studies or task forces, but California is the first to attempt to turn those ideas into law.

The 14 measures introduces by the Legislative Black Caucus touch on education, civil rights and criminal justice, including reviving a years-old effort to restrict solitary confinement that failed to make it out of the statehouse as recently as last year.

Not included is any type of financial competition to descendants of Black slaves, a polarizing proposal that has received a cool response from many state Democrats, including Gov. Gavin Newsom.

“While many only associate direct cash payments with reparations, the true meaning of the word, to repair, involves much more,” Assemblymember Lori Wilson, chair of the caucus, said in a statement. “We need a comprehensive approach to dismantling the legacy of slavery and systemic racism.”

Black lawmakers are already anticipating uphill battle. They anticipate spending many hours to educate fellow legislators and convince them to pass the bills.

Some of the measures could also run into legal trouble.

Democratic Assemblymember Corey Jackson, who represents a district north of San Diego, is proposing asking voters to change California’s Constitution to allow the state to fund programs aimed at “increasing the life expectancy of, improving educational outcomes for, or lifting out of poverty specific groups based on race, color, ethnicity, national origin, or marginalized genders, sexes, or sexual orientations.”

That plan could face a similar constitutional challenge like the one that ultimately dismantled affirmative action.

Other proposals include protections for “natural and protective” hairstyles in all competitive sports, and a formal apology by the governor and the Legislature for the state’s role in human rights violations and crimes against humanity on African slaves and their descendants.

The caucus will flesh out the package in the coming weeks.


February 1, 2024: California’s Legislative Black Caucus released a slate of reparations bills to implement ideas from the state’s landmark task force on the issue. The proposals include potential compensation for property seized from Black owners, but do not call for widespread direct cash payments to descendants of enslaved Black people The Associated Press reported.

If approved, the proposals would expand access to technical education, fund community-driven solutions to violence and eliminate occupational licensing fees for people with criminal backgrounds. Another proposal would pay for programs that increase life expectancy, better educational outcomes or lift certain groups out of poverty.

Some of the measures would require amending the state constitution and are likely to face opposition. In 2022, the Democratic-controlled state Senate voted down a proposal to ban involuntary servitude and Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom has resisted restricting solitary confinement for prison inmates.

State Sen. Steven Bradford, D-Gardena, said at a news conference Thursday that the Black caucus’s priority list does not preclude individual lawmakers from introducing additional reparations legislation. He cautioned that the journey will be long and difficult, but worth it.

“This is a defining moment not only in California history, but in American history as well,” said Bradford, who served on the nine-person state task force on reparations.

But the 14 proposals are already drawing criticism from advocates who don’t think they go far enough.

Chris Lodgson, an organizer with the Coalition for a Just and Equitable California, which pushed to create the reparations task force, said the proposals are “not reparations.”

“Not one person who is a descendant who is unhoused will be off the street from that list of proposals. Not one single mom who is struggling who is a descendant will be helped,” he said. “Not one dime of the debt that’s owed is being repaid.”

California entered the union as a free state in 1850, but in practice, it sanctioned slavery and approved policies and practices that thwarted Black people from owning homes and starting businesses. Black communities were aggressively policed and their neighborhoods polluted, according to a groundbreaking report released as part of the committee’s work.


February 1, 2024: Lawmakers in California have revealed a sweeping set of legislative proposals aimed providing reparations for state residents who are descendants of enslaved Americans CNN reported.

The California Legislative Black Caucus announced the 2024 Reparations Priority Bill Package Wednesday, which lists 14 measures, including providing a formal apology for “human rights violations and crimes against humanity on African slaves and their descendants.”

The package also proposes creating a state-funded grant program to decrease community violence in Black neighborhoods and requiring advanced notification about grocery store closures in underserved and at-risk communities.

State lawmakers said in a news release Wednesday that some of the legislation has already been introduced in the state’s General Assembly, or will be introduced during the current legislative session.

Lawmakers said some of the measures that have already been introduced include expanding the state’s CROWN Act to ban hair discrimination in sports, creating a grant program that increased high school and college enrollment in STEM-related programs, and prohibiting book bans in prisons without review and oversight from the state’s correctional facilities.

Assemblywoman Lori D. Wilson, chair of the California Legislative Black Caucus, said addressing reparations entails more than providing financial compensation.

“As laid out in the report, we need a comprehensive approach to dismantling the legacy of slavery and systemic racism, Wilson said in a statement.

“This year’s legislative package tackles a wide range of issues, from criminal justice reforms, to property rights, to education, civil rights and food justice. The Caucus is looking to make strides in the second half of this legislative session as we build towards righting the wrongs of California’s past in future sessions.”

Wilson said the caucus’ first step will be to introduce a resolution recognizing how California laws have harmed Black residents.

Last June, a task force examining reparations for Black residents in the state released its final report with more than 115 recommendations for how the state should make amends for slavery and “historical atrocities,” CNN previously reported.

Among the recommendations was a proposal for monetary compensations to be paid to descendants of enslaved Africans living in California. The report did not provide a specific amount that should be paid at the time the task force said the amount should be decided by lawmakers.

On Thursday, California state Sen. Steven Bradford, who was a member of the reparations task force, acknowledged that the state’s budget deficit could affect implementing the proposed measures.

“We have to have at least a placeholder in the budget for reparations,” Bradford told reporters during a news conference, adding that the state has reserves that could be designated to fund legislation.

The caucus said introducing the package was a first step in what it says will be “a multi-year effort to implement the legislative recommendations in the report.”

The list of proposed bills in the California Legislature Black Caucus wants to pass this year would do the following:

  • ACA 7 – Amend the California Constitution to permit the state to fund programs for specific groups of people that help to increase life expectancy, improve educational outcomes and lift them out of poverty.
  • ACA 8 – Amend the California Constitution to prohibit involuntary servitude for incarcerated people.
  • ACR 135 – Formally recognize and accept the state’s responsibility for the harms and atrocities of state representatives who promoted, facilitated, enforced and permitted slavery.
  • AB 1815 – Prohibit discrimination based on natural and protective hairstyles in all competitive sports within California.
  • AB 1929 – Offer competitive grants to increase enrollment of African American descendants in STEM-related career technical education
  • AB 1975 – Offer medically supportive food and nutritional interventions as permanent Medi-Cal benefits in California.
  • AB 1986 – End the California prison system’s practice of banning books without oversight and review.

Proposals that the caucus intended to introduce in the next two weeks would seek to:

  • Offer career education financial aid to redlined communities.
  • Restore property taken under race-based eminent domain or offer other remedies to the original owner.
  • Issue a formal apology for human rights violations and crimes against humanity on African slaves and their descendants.
  • Restrict solitary confinement in correctional detention facilities.
  • Offer state-funded grants for African American communities to decrease violence.
  • Require notification to community stakeholders before the closure of a grocery store in an underserved community.
  • Eliminate barriers to occupational licenses for people with criminal records.

February 1, 2024: California lawmakers announced the first set of reparations bills on Wednesday, with legislation that would require the state to recognize and apologize for systemic racism against Black residents for nearly two centuries, The Guardian reported.

The 14 proposed bills tackle a wide range of areas of discrimination, from mass incarceration to housing segregation, but do not include any financial compensation for descendants of longtime Black residents affected by the legacy of slavery, the most controversial recommendation to emerge from California’s previous reparations taskforce report.

“While many only associate direct cash payments with reparations, the true meaning of the word, to repair, involves much more,” Lori Wilson, a state assemblymember and the chair of the California Legislative Black caucus (CLBC), said in a statement announcing the legislation. Wilson, said the reparations package offered “a comprehensive approach to dismantling the legacy of slavery and systemic racism.”

California’s reparations taskforce, formed in the wake of nationwide racial justice protests in 2020 that followed the police killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis, released a 500-page report in 2022, documenting more than 170 years of state-sanctioned racism against Black residents, and followed it with a 1,100-page final report in 2023, that included a long list of potential ways the state could redress and repair these historic wrongs, including individual cash payments.

The reports attribute the enduring wealth gap between Black and white Americans to generations of “atrocities in nearly every sector of civil society” including “segregation, racial terror, [and] harmful racist neglect”.

THE CLBC said the “first step” of its reparations package would be a resolution, ACR 135, that recognizes “how laws in California were crafted to directly cause harm to its Black residents”, and that it would be followed by a bill requisition a formal apology by California’s governor and its legislature for the role California played in human rights violations against African slaves and their descendants.

The CLBC’s other bills include some sweeping measures and many smaller ones. Responding to the increased attention to how Black Californians’ property was repeatedly seized by local governments without proper compensation, one bill would “restore property taken during race-based uses of eminent domain to its original owners or provide another effective remedy where appropriate, such as restitution or compensation”. Another would “amend the California Constitution to prohibit involuntary servitude for incarcerated persons.”

Other bills would prohibit discrimination against natural hairstyles in competitive sports, require that grocery stores in under-served communities provide public notification before they close, block the state’s prison system from banning books without review, and create grant programs to expand access to career technical education in STEM fields and to fund “community-driven solutions to decrease community violence” in African-American communities.

The proposals, only some of which have been released with the full text of the legislation, have been met with both praise and skepticism.

Jonathan Burgess, a Sacramento firefighter who has been a prominent supporter of reparations, told CalMatters that the legislation was “phenomenal” and that “it’s a monumental, profound time.”

Erika Smith, a columnist for the Los Angeles Times, called it “one of the most half-baked packages of bills that I’ve ever seen”, adding “I hope this gets better.”

California’s first-in-the-nation state reparations effort has inspired individual cities, including San Francisco, Boston, and Detroit, to form their own taskforces to consider reparations for Black residents. But it has also sparked thorny debates over who should be eligible for reparations, as well as major rightwing backlash, particularly with the 2023 taskforce recommendation that descendants of both enslaved and free Black Americans who lived in the US in the 19th century should receive financial payments as compensation for generations of discriminatory treatment.

While a majority of California voters believe the “legacy of slavery continues to impose a toll on Blacks residents”, reparations through cash payments to individuals are unpopular among most voters, according to an August 2023 poll.

The poll found that 75% of Black California voters supported reparations payments, but majorities of white, Asian and Pacific Islander and Latino voters opposed them.


February 2, 2024: The California Legislative Black Caucus on Wednesday outlined the first set of reparations for the descendants of African Americans who were enslaved in the United States, with proposals that include a call for the state to issue a formal apology, to prohibit involuntary servitude in prisons and to return property seized by governments under race-based eminent domain. Los Angeles Times reported.

The caucus is not yet calling for cash payments in a list of 14 reparations bills it hopes to pass this year that would enact wide-ranging reforms in education, civil rights, criminal justice, health and business.

The package of legislation is based on recommendations issue by California’s Reparations Task Force at the conclusion of a two-year historical process to study the effects of slavery and suggest policy changes to state lawmakers.

Assemblywoman Lori D. Wilson (D-Suisun City), chair of the California Legislature Black Caucus, said the apology is the first priority on the list of bills that she hopes will begin the conversation at the Capitol about reparations as she and her colleagues launch a campaign to educate the public about the state’s legacy of racism.

The decision to forgo an immediate call for cash payments comes as Gov. Gavin Newsom and lawmakers struggle to offset a budget shortfall of at least $37.9 billion. Newsom has proposed dipping into the state’s rainy-day reserves, cutting $8.5 billion from climate change initiatives and reducing more than $1.2 billion for housing programs as means to reduce spending to account for the lower than expected tax revenue.

“We started realizing with the budget environment we were going to have to do more systemic policy change to address systemic racism versus big budget asks because there just wasn’t the budget for it,” Wilson said. “Our priorities centered around policy changes or creating opportunities.”

Newsom has echoed statements from the task force and Black lawmakers that reparations are about more than cash payments. In a recent interview, he said the finished reading through the task force’s report at the end of the year and his office is working on a detailed 30-page analysis of the recommendations that examines the work the state has already done and what more can be done.

When asked why his budget didn’t include reparations proposals, he said he knew the Black Caucus planned to share its own list of priorities and he didn’t want to get ahead of the group’s process.

“So, we wanted to engage them,” Newsom said. “Remember, this was initiated by the Legislature. This is a partnership, and they recognize that there are a lot of things in that report they recommended that we’ve already done and that we’re doing. This gave us time to assess all that. So, it’s been actively worked on.”

Cash payments, in particular, have struggled to earn support among Californian voters, according to recent opinion polls. Newsom disregarded the idea that reparations could be tough to pass in an election year.

“That’s not been part of my thinking,” Newsom said. “My thinking is just accountability to be honest and responsible and to take seriously the recommendations.”

Wilson described the legislative package as the first phase of a multi-year effort to pass reparations. She said she hopes educating the public about California’s role in slavery and the harm caused by racist policies will help her colleagues and Californians understand the need for the state to atone.


February 2, 2024: The California Legislative Black Caucus introduced more than a dozen reparations-related bills Wednesday, the day before the start of Black History Month. HuffPost reported.

The historic package of legislation follows the June 2023 release of a 500-page Reparation Task Force Report, which listed myriad recommendations to remedy generations of systemic harm against Black Californians, beginning during slavery.

None of the 14 bills includes cash payouts to Black residents across the board in the face of a projected state budget deficit of nearly $40 billion, the Los Angeles Times reported.

A 2023 poll by the institute of Governmental Studies at the University of California, Berkeley, co-sponsored by the L.A. Times, found that the majority of California residents do not support reparations in the form of cash.

“We started realizing with the budget environment we were going to have to do more systemic policy change to address systemic racism, versus big budget asks because there just wasn’t the budget for it,” state Assemblywoman Lori D. Wilson (D) said, according to the L.A. Times. “Our priorities centered around policy changes or creating opportunities.”

The bills, known collectively as the 2024 CLBC Reparations Priority Bill Package, focus on improvements in education, health, business, prisons and civil rights. According to The Associated Press, several of the bills call for California’s Constitution to be changed, which will be a tough sell to some lawmakers.

The package also has its critics who say the bills don’t go far enough.

“Not one person who is a descendant who is unhoused will be off the street from that list of proposals. Not one single mom who is struggling who is a descendant will be helped,” Chris Lodgson, an organizer with the Coalition for a Just and Equitable California, said, according to The Associated Press. “Not one dime of the debt that’s owed is being repaid.”…


February 22, 2024: Members of California’s Legislative Black Caucus on Wednesday will detail a package of 14 reparations bills they are introducing to right historic wrongs carried out against the Black community, Reuters reported (via Microsoft Start).

The bills are meant to be the first step in a multi-year effort. Among several issues, they would compensate people whose property was taken in race-based cases of eminent domain, seek an apology from the governor and the legislature for human rights violations, and fund community-based programs to decrease violence in Black communities.

But none of the bills being proposed call for cash reparations to be paid, which has garnered criticism from some members of the Black community.

“While many only associate direct cash payments with reparations the true meaning of the word, to repair, involves much more,” Assemblywoman Lori D. Wilson, Chair of the California Legislative Black Caucus, said in a written statement.

The 14 bills are the first legislative action from an extensive 1,100-page report delivered in June to lawmakers by the California Reparations Task Force, a group created by a state bill in 2020. The task force worked for two years on its report, which urged legislators to take action on over 100 recommendations.

Americans are divided on the issue or reparations.

A Reuters/Ipsos survey published earlier this year found that nearly 60% of respondents identifying as Democrat support reparations. Just 18% of Republicans do.

The split is even greater between Black and white Americans: the poll found that 74% of Black Americans favor reparations when compared to 26% of white Americans.

California Assemblymember Reggie Jones-Sawyer said the package of bills would address decades of laws and policies designed to restrict and alienate Black Americans.

“These atrocities are found in education, access to homeownership, and to capital for small business startups, all of which contributed to the denial of generational wealth over hundreds of years,” Jones-Sawyer said in a written statement.

Civil Rights attorney Areva Martin, the lead counsel for a group of over 1,000 survivors and their descendants whose community was taken by the city of Palm Springs in the 1950s and 1960s, praised the first legislative steps.

But Martin said cash payments need to be made to Black Californians – just as payments have been made to other wronged groups in the U.S., such as Japanese Americans interned in camps during World War Two.

“People get squirmish about cash payments – and they shouldn’t. There is only this trepidation when it comes to African Americans,” Martin said.

“I think some of that is because anti-Blackness is so pervasive. It also has to do with racist tropes around Black folks and our inability to handle money.”


April 10, 2024: California Bill To Create Freedman Affairs Agency For Reparations Advances

Legislation calling for a California American Freedmen Affairs Agency to help implement reparations is one step closer to passage!

California’s SB 1403, which aims to create a government agency responsible for helping administer reparations, advanced out of the state’s Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday in an 8-1 vote. The bull now heads to the Senate Governmental Organization Committee.

If enacted, the California American Freedmen Affairs Agency would have its own Genealogy Office and Office of Legal Affairs to support reparations claims. Only African-American descendants of an enslaved person or free Black people living in the US prior to the end of the 19th century would qualify to receive compensation.

The new agency would also have the power to oversee and monitor existing state agencies and departments’ implementation of reparations measures that fall within their scope of authority.

SB 1403 emerged out of the over 115 policy recommendations in the California Reparations Task Force’s final report, issued last June after two years of research and public engagement.

Kamilah Moore, who served as the task force’s chair, testified Tuesday to the bill’s urgent necessity, saying, “This agency symbolizes a crucial stride towards reparatory justice, particularly for those whose lineage traces back to enslaved ancestors.”

California American Freedmen Affairs Agency to tackle deep-rooted disparities

In her testimony, Moore went on to provide examples of how Black Californians who trace their ancestry to the enslavement era continue to suffer stark racial disparities today.

Descendant families’ median net wealth is just a small fraction of that of white families, she said, while descendant entrepreneurs are three times more likely to be denied bank loans, limiting their potential for economic growth and innovation.

Health care access and outcomes also remain starkly unequal, with infants in descendant families two times more likely to die by their first birthday.

“These statistics are not mere numbers but reflect real lives diminished by systemic injustices, a legacy of slavery and systemic discrimination perpetuated by the State of California,” Moore said.

“This agency seeks to dismantle these barriers, advocating for and implementing measures that address these deep-rooted disparities.”

The vote on SB 1403 took place on the birthday of the late Paul Robeson, a legendary African-American athlete, singer, actor, scholar, and activist. In 1951, Robeson submitted a petition before the United Nations charging the US with genocide against Black Americans.


April 23 2024: The Sacramento Bee (via Microsoft Start) posted: “California reparations bills clear first state Senate hearings” It was written by Darrell Smith.

Reparations bills to fund reparations policy and tackle past racially motivated eminent domain that took property from and displaced Black Californians sailed through their first hearings this week at the state Capitol.

The bills are part of the historic Reparations Priority Bill Package introduced in February by the California Legislative Black Caucus.

“This is a debt that is owed to the people who helped build this country. Reparations is a debt owed to the descendants of slavery,” said the bills’ author, state Sen. Steven Bradford, D-Gardena, vice chair of the California Legislative Black Caucus.

Bradford also sat on the first-in-the-nation California Reparations Task Force to advance the case for reparations to California descendants of enslaved Black people.

“This is not a handout or a charity of any sort,” Bradford said Tuesday. “It’s what is owed, what is promised, what is 160 years overdue.”

The historic toll of eminent domain – government’s taking of private property for public use — on California’s Black communities and Black Californians’ generational wealth is behind Bradford’s Senate Bill 1050, which passed with a 6-1 vote in the state Senate Judiciary Committee.

The bill creates a pathway to return land or provide restitution to Californians who have had their land taken by the state or local government for racially motivated reasons, Bradford said. It will also create a way for the state to review claims of abuse and determine whether compensation is warranted.

“The power of eminent domain has been repeatedly used to move Black and brown people off their land, to destroy homes and to devastate the opportunity for families to build generational wealth,” Bradford said.

Between 1949-1973, as America’s white middle class had taken flight, 992 cities displaced 1 million people through eminent domain, according to Eminent Domain and African Americans, a 2007 report for the Institute for Justice. Two-thirds were Black.

“How do we heal harm like that? We provide compensation and we give land back,” testified Kavon Ward, founder of Los Angeles-based Where Is My Land?, an organization that supports Black people in their quest to reclaim land taken through eminent domain and other racially motivated policy.

Examples abound across California’s historically Black neighborhoods in Los Angeles, San Diego and San Francisco’s Fillmore District, to once-thriving Black and Latino communities like the East Bay’s Russel City. The city of Hayward annexed the community in the 1960s, seizing the land to make way for an industrial park, evicting its residents and demolishing their homes and businesses.

The city of Hayward formally apologized in 2021 and created a reparative justice project to work with former Russell City residents and their descendants to determine appropriate restitution for forcibly relocating Russell residents.

Jessie Johnson was a Russell City resident in 1963. “We were forced out of our land,” she testified Tuesday. “You can’t see pain, but you can feel i. It hurt and it hurt very badly.”

Johnson’s mother-in-law and grandparents also lived in Russell City. Johnson recalled her husband, a Navy sailor, returning home from sea duty to find his community gone.

“Our houses had been burned down. Our homes were devastated.” Johnson said. “Please, give us our land back. We want to be paid and compensated for the hurt and the loss.”

Roger Niello, R-Sacramento, cast the lone “no” votes on both reparations bills Tuesday; as well as Bradford’s bill last week to create the agency that would oversee reparations for Black Californians.

Senate Bill 1403 would create the California American Freedmen Affairs Agency, the body responsible for overseeing and monitoring the state agencies and departments that would implement reparations.

The agency is inspired by the 1865 federal act that create a Freedmen’s Bureau to provide food, shelter, clothing, medical services and land to African Americans newly freed from enslavement.

SB 1403, also carried by Bradford, passed out of the judiciary committee and is now on to the Senate’s government organization committee.

“This agency will be the necessary foundations for the implementation and success of reparations,” Bradford said at last week’s committee hearing. “The most important responsibility of this agency will be determining which individuals are eligible for reparations programs and services – the descendants of chattel slavery.”

On Tuesday, Niello, who also sits as vice chair of the state Senate’s Budget and Fiscal Review Committee, said the eminent domain bill would force California taxpayers to bear the costs of local jurisdictions’ injustice instead of holding local governments to account.

“My initial reaction is that this is a piece of legislation that I can support. But you made it the responsibility of all the taxpayers of California for the injustices of local jurisdictions. That seems to be to be a bit of an injustice also,” Niello said from the dais. “It’s an entirely supportable concept that I can’t support.”

Bradford said local jurisdictions will be held responsible if they played a direct role in taking land for racially motivated reasons.

“The damage is real and not only should local agencies be responsible but the state as a whole and nation as a whole because we wouldn’t be here today if it weren’t for the racist policies that still exist in America and here in California,” Bradford said.

A fund for reparations

Senate Bill 1331 passed out of the senate committee 5-1, with Niello opposing, and would create the Fund for Reparations and Restorative Justice.

The fund would draw 6% of state budget reserves to pay for policies to compensate descendants of enslaved Black people or descendants of a free Black person living in the country before the end of the 19th century. The number reflects the percentage of California’s Black population.

The bill also allows the fund to receive money from federal, state or local grants; or from private donations or grants.

Senate Bill 1331 was written to “recognize the financial challenges and budget deficit that the state currently faces,” Bradford said, acknowledging California’s multi-billion-dollar deficit. “It does not take funding away from any program.”

“If the (state) budget is a refection of our values, our priorities, reparations has to be funded,” Bradford said. “The cost of reparations will be high, but so was the harm done to African Americans. That harm and those disparities continue to this day.”


May 21, 2024: Reparations proposals for Black Californians advance to state Assembly (AP)

The California Senate advanced a set of ambitious reparations proposals Tuesday, including legislation that would create an agency to help Black families research their family lineage and confirm their eligibility for any future restitution by the state.

Lawmakers also passed bills to create a fund for reparations programs and compensate Black families for property that the government unjustly seized from them using eminent domain. The proposals now head to the state Assembly.

State Sen. Steven Bradford, a Los Angeles area Democrat, said California “bears great responsibility” to atone for injustices against Black Californians.

“If you can inherit generational wealth, you can inherit generational debt,” Bradford said. “Reparations is a debt that is owed to descendants of slavery.”

The proposals, which passed largely along party lines, are part of a slate of bills inspired by recommendations from a first-in-the-nation task force that spent two years studying how the state could atone for its legacy or racism and discrimination against African Americans. Lawmakers did not introduce a proposal this year to provide widespread payments to descendants of enslaved Black people, which has frustrated many reparations advocates.

In the U.S. Congress, a bill to study reparations for African Americans that was first introduced in the 1980s has stalled. Illinois and New York state passed laws recently to study reparations, but no other state has gotten further along than California in its consideration of reparations for Black Americans.

California state Sen. Roger Niello, a Republican representing the Sacramento suburbs, said he supports “the principle” of the eminent domain bill, but doesn’t think taxpayers across the state should have to pay families for land that was seized by local governments.”

“That seems to be to be a bit of an injustice in and of itself,” Niello said.

The votes come on the last week for lawmakers to pass bills in their house of origin, and days after a key committee blocked legislation that would have given property tax and housing assistance to descendants of enslaved people. The state Assembly advanced a bill last week that would make California formally apologize for its legacy of discrimination against Black Californians. In 2019, Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom issued a formal apology for the state’s history of violence against and mistreatment of Native Americans.

Some opponents of reparations say lawmakers are overpromising on what they can deliver to Black Californians as the state faces a multibillion dollar budget deficit.

“It seems to me like they’re putting, number one, the cart before the horse,” said Republican Assemblymember Bill Essayli, who represents part of Riverside County in Southern California. “They’re setting up these agencies and frameworks to dispense reparations without actually passing any reparations.”

It could cost the state up to $1 million annually to run the agency, according to an estimate by the Senate Appropriations Committee. The committee didn’t release cost estimates for implementing the eminent domain and reparations funds bills. But the group says it could cost the state hundreds of thousands of dollars to investigate claims by families who say their land was taken because of racially discriminatory motives.

Chris Lodgson, an organizer with reparations-advocacy group the Coalition for a Just and Equitable California, said ahead of the votes that they would be a “first step” toward passing more far-reaching reparations laws in California.

“This is a historic day,” he said.


May 22, 2024: California Senate Advances Trio Of Reparations Bills In Significant Move (TAG 24)

California state Senator Steven Bradford has announced on Tuesday that three separate reparations bills had passed out of the upper chamber.

Senate Bill 1403 would create the California American Freedman Affairs Agency, tasked with helping administer reparations. The legislation advanced out of the Senate Judiciary Committee in April.

If enacted, the government agency would have its own Genealogy Office and Office if Legal Affairs to support reparations claims. It would also have the power to oversee and monitor existing state agencies and departments’ implementation of reparations measures that fall within their scope of authority.

Senate Bill 1050 would establish a means of restoring property seized in race-based uses of eminent domain to the original owners or their descendants, or providing them with financial compensation.

Senate Bill 1331 would set up the Fund for Reparations and Reparative Justice in the state treasury to finance reparation initiatives approved by the legislature and governor.

Bradford introduced all three bills in the months since the California Reparations Task Force released its groundbreaking final report. The nine-member body’s 115 policy recommendations were designed to address generations of harms against Black people.


May 28, 2024: Three bills aimed at creating sources of the funding for the compensation of Black Californians passed the state’s Senate after years of groundwork. The bills, which were authored by Democratic State Sen. Steven Bradford, will create a fund for reparations, provide compensation for land taken by eminent domain for racially biased reasons, and the creation the California American Freedmen Affairs Agency. (BlackEnterprise.com)

According to USA Today, Rep. Bradford believes that the state “bears great responsibility” in addressing the injustices it perpetrated against Black people through enslavement, segregation, discrimination and stigmatizing Black Californians.

Bradford continued, “These are not a handout or charity by any measure. It is what was promised. It is what is owed and what is 160 years overdue. If you can inherit generational wealth, you can inherit generational debt,” Bradford said. “Reparations is a debt that is owed to descendants of slavery.”

The fund will also establish support for future projects designed to compensate Black people or descendants of an enslaved person who lived in California during the 19th Century. A previous version of the bill stipulated that the bill was to be funded from 6% of the state budget reserve, but that has since been eliminated, which leaves the source of the bill’s funding unclear.

The same bill establishing the Freedmen Affairs Agency also would create a Genealogy Office and an Office of Legal Affairs, while the bill that establishes compensation for eminent domain also gives the Office the authority to review, investigate, and determine the status of applications for the compensation of land taken by the practice of eminent domain.

A California Divide reports, legislators in the Senate advanced three bills and an official apology for California’s role in slavery, AB 3089. That bill, authored by Assemblymember Reggie-Jones-Sawyer, was written following his term on the state’s task force that was commissioned to study the harms the state perpetuated against its Black residents.

As Jones-Sawyer told the Assembly ahead of the vote, “We were people’s properties in this state. And it was defended by the State Supreme Court and other courts.”

Assuming the three bills are passed by the members of the Assembly, they will then head to Gov. Gavin Newsom’s desk. Two other bills, SB 1007 and SB 1013 died ahead of the vote as the California Black Caucus did not designate them as priority bills for this year’s legislative session.

Newsom, California’s Democratic Governor, has signaled support for times that do not involve cash payments, but he has also been cutting funding from various areas, including education, to reduce California’s ballooning budget.

Ahead of the session, Bradford was critical of some of the bills advanced by the Caucus, praising them as a great start before telling the California Divide, “… there’s much more heavy lifting that will be needed to be done in the years to come.”

Jones-Sawyer also told the outlet that he believes the bills are necessary. “All of the bills are important,” Jones-Sawyer said. “Taken in totality; it’s not just inching this or inching that. All of these bills have a significant impact on moving forward with closing the wealth gap.”


June 15, 2024: California reparations bills one step closer to passage after Assembly Judiciary Vote (Via Microsoft start)

California state Senator Steven Bradford has announced on Tuesday that three reparations bills he authored had passed out of the Assembly Judiciary Committee.

Senate Bill 1403 would create the California American Freedmen Affairs Agency, tasked with helping administer reparations. The government agency would have its own Genealogy Office and Office of Legal Affairs to support reparations claims. It would also have the power to oversee and monitor existing state agencies and departments’ implementation of reparations measures that fall within their scope of authority.

SB 1403 California Freedmen Affairs Agency (Revised June 11, 2024)

SB 1403, as amended, Bradford. California American Freedmen Affairs Agency.

Former law, until July 1, 2023, established the Task Force to Study and Develop Reparation Proposals for African Americans, with a Special Consideration for African Americans Who are Descendants of Persons Enslaved in the United States. (Task Force).

Former law required the Task Force, among other things, to identify, compile, and synthesize the relevant corpus of evidentiary documentation of the institution of slavery that existed within the United States and the colonies, as specified, and to recommend the form of compensation that should be awarded, the instrumentalities through which it should be awarded, and who would be eligible for this compensation.

The bill would establish the California American Affairs Agency in state government, under the control of the secretary, who would be appointed by the Governor and confirmed by the Senate. The bill would require the agency to implement the recommendations of the Task Force, as approved by the Legislature and the Governor. The bill would require the agency, as part of its duties, to determine how an individual’s status as a descendant would be confirmed. The bill would also require proof of an individual’s descendant status to be a qualifying criterion for benefits authorized by the state for descendants. To accomplish these goals, the bill would require the agency to be comprised of a Genealogy Office and an Office of Legal Affairs.

The bill would further require the agency to oversee and monitor existing state agencies and departments tasked with engaging in direct implementation of the policies that fall within the scope of the existing state agencies’ and departments’ authority, including policies related to reparations.

Existing law prohibits a state agency, with certain exceptions, from employing any in-house counsel to act on behalf of the state agency or its employees in any judicial or administrative adjudicating proceeding in which the agency is interested, or is a party as a result of office or official duties, or contracting with outside counsel for any purpose.

This bill would exempt the California American Freedmen Affairs Agency from the above described prohibition...

Senate Bill 1050 would establish a means of restoring property seized in race-based uses of eminent domain to the original owners or their descendants, or of providing them with financial compensation.

SB 1050, as amended, Bradford. California American Freedmen Affairs Agency: racially motivated eminent domain.

Existing law establishes, until January 1, 2030, the Racial Equity Commission within the Office of Planning and Research and requires the commission to develop resources, best practices, and tools for advancing racial equity by, among other things, developing a statewide Racial Equity Framework that includes methodologies and tools that can be employed to advance racial equity and address structural racism in California.

The bill would require the Office of Legal Affairs, which would be established within the California American Freedmen Affairs Agency as provided by SB 1403 of the 2023-24 Regular Session, to, upon appropriation by the Legislature, review, investigate, and make certain determinations regarding applications from persons who claim they are the dispossessed owner, as defined, of property taken as a result of a racially motivated eminent domain.

The bill would define “racially motivated eminent domain” to mean when the state, county, city, city and county, district, or other political subdivision of the state acquires private property for public use and does not distribute just compensation to the owner at the time of the taking, or the failure to provide just property or just compensation is warranted, as provided, the bill would require the Office of Legal Affairs to certify that the dispossessed owner is entitled to the return of the taken property, as specified, or other publicly held property, as defined, of equal value, or financial compensation as specified, Upon a determination that the dispossessed owner is entitled to other public held property of equal value, the bill would require the Office of Legal Affairs to solicit and select, as specified a list of recommendations of publicly held properties that are suitable as compensation, as provided.

Upon a rejection of the determination of the Office of Legal Affairs by the state or local agency that took property by racially motivated eminent domain, the bill would authorize the dispossessed owner, as specified, to bring an action to challenge the taking or the amount of compensation, as provided.

Upon a determination that an applicant is not a dispossessed owner or issuing property or just compensation is not warranted, the bill would require the Office of Legal Affairs to notify the applicant of its finding and provide an appeals process, as specified. The bill would make every finding, decision, determination, or other official act of the California American Freedmen Affairs Agency subject to judicial review.

Existing law generally prohibits state agencies from employing in-house counsel to act on behalf of the agency or its employees in judicial or administrative adjudicative proceedings, but exempts specified agencies from this provision.

This bill would exempt the California American Freedmen Affairs Agency from that provision.

This bill would make related findings and declarations, including those related to a gift of public funds…

Senate Bill 1331 would set up the Fund for Reparations and Reparative Justice in the state treasury to finance reparations initiatives approved by the legislature and governor.

SB 1331, as amended, Bradford. The Fund for Reparations and Reparative Justice.

Previously existing law established, until July 1, 2023, the Task Force to Study and Develop Reparation Proposals for African Americans, with a Special Consideration for African Americans Who are Descendants of Person’s Enslaved in the United States.

Previously existing law required the Task Force to, among other things, identify, compile, and synthesize the relevant corpus of evidentiary documentation of the institution of slavery that existed within the United States and the colonies that became the United States, as specified, and to recommend appropriate remedies in consideration of the Task Force’s findings, as specified. Previously existing law required the Task Force to submit a written report of its findings and recommendations to the Legislature, as specified.

This bill would establish the Fund for Reparations and Reparative Justice in the State Treasury for the purpose of funding policies approved by the Legislature and the Governor that address the harm that the State of California has caused to descendants of an African American chattel enslaved person or descendants of a free Black person living in the United States prior to the end of the 19th century. The bill would authorize the fund to receive moneys from any other federal, state, or local grant, or from any private donation or grant, as specified. The bill would also make related findings and declarations…

Bradford introduced all three bills following the release of the California Reparations Task Force’s groundbreaking final report. The senate served on the nine-member body, which was tasked with crafting a plan to address generations of harms against Black people in the Golden State.

“Many people, again, will say California wasn’t a slave state. Yes, we were, and it’s about time that people open their eyes and understand the harms the are still in existence here in California and across this nation because of slavery,” Bradford told his colleagues in the Assembly Judiciary Committee.

All three of Bradford’s bills have been approved in the state Senate. Tuesday’s vote brings them one step closer to final passage.


June 21, 2024: The California Legislative Black Caucus is hitting the road on a statewide tour to promote its slate of 14 reparation bills, while the clock is ticking on getting those proposed laws to the governor’s desk before the legislative session ends on August 31. Last weekend, the campaign kicked off in San Diego. CalMatter’s Neil Chase, Denise Amos, Deborah Brennan, and I all got to attend the event at Crawford High School. (CalMatters Network – via Sacramento Observer)

Deborah wrote a news report about a town-hall style discussion of the measures. There’s also a video of presentations made at the event, including those of Secretary of State Dr. Shirley Weber, Assemblymembers Akilah Webber, Corey Jackson, Mike Gipson, and State Sen. Steven Bradford. The legislators encourage community members to read a 1,000-page report that outlines the reasons for reparations and gives more than 100 recommendations to make them happen.

California became the first state in the nation to form a reparations task force three years ago and the first to introduce a comprehensive reparations package.

The six-city tour is meant to urge the public to get involved in lobbying lawmakers to pass the new legislation. Their 14 reparations measures tackle education, business, criminal justice, health care, and civil rights and include two proposed constitutional amendments that lawmakers hope to place before voters in November.

One of the amendments, ACA 8, would ban one of the last vestiges of involuntary servitude: forced labor in jails and prisons. The other, ACA 7, would authorize the state to pay for programs designed to improve life expectancy and educational outcomes of “groups based on race, color, ethnicity, national origin, or marginalized genders, sexes, or sexual orientations.”

The bills to place the proposed amendments on the ballot must first pass the Senate Appropriations Committee by June 24 in order to meet a June 27 deadline to finalize ballot measures, Brennan reported.

There will be more State of Black California community listening sessions evens in five additional cities over the next five months.


June 24, 2024: A Democratic assemblyman in California went viral after tearfully defending a proposed reparations bill. A Republican lawmaker argued that nonwhite residents should not have to pay for reparations. (BlackEnterprise.com)

The bill, titled SB 1331, followed recommendations by the state’s reparations task force, per the New York Post.

Despite its advancement from a vote by the Assembly Judiciary Committee, the potential legislation still faces pushback, specifically from Assemblywoman Kate Sanchez.

Sanchez argued that minorities make up more than half of California’s population, specifically Latino and Asian. Sanchez identifies as Hispanic.

She stated they “had nothing to do with slavery, discrimination, Jim Crow laws” and did not need to pay toward reparations. According to economists, the cost of reparation for Black Californians could total over $800 billion.

“To pay for that, you’d need a major tax hike unlike anything this state has ever seen before,” explained Sanchez. “I recognize and acknowledge the painful part of our history, [but] the pains of our past should not be paid by the people of today.”

However, Assemblyman Ash Karla teared up as he explained the necessity of reparations, especially in monetary form. Karla made history in 2016 as the first Indian-American elected to California’s state legislature.

“I understand that it’s hard to ask those of us currently sitting in the legislature to make those commitments, but no one asked Black families over generations, if it was OK to take their wealth, if it was OK to enslave them, if it was OK to…” he began to say as tears filled his eyes.

After regaining his composure, he added, “If it was OK to put their children in generations of poverty. This country became a superpower based upon the free labor of African descendants over hundred of years. We need to recognize it.”

According to its author, State Sen. Steven Bradford, the bill could extend reparations beyond monetary payments. Free healthcare and college tuition have emerged as potential measures.

It remains one of our reparations bills passed by the committee thus far.


June 25, 2024: Black advocates are in agreement following last weekend’s announcement that the state will earmark $12 million over the next year to launch reparations — the money is a good start, but not nearly enough. (The Sacramento Bee – via Yahoo! News)

“That is a lowball amount, especially given the amount of harm that was done to Black people in this state and for the amount of time that it was done,” said Kavon Ward, co-founder of Where Is My Land, a group that advocates for Black people trying to reclaim lost and stolen land.

The $12 million comes as part of the budget agreement for the 2024-25 fiscal year between Gov. Gavin Newsom and Democratic leaders.

Funding will help implement reparations bills endorsed by the California Legislative Black Caucus. This year, the caucus introduced a first-in-the-nation reparations package with bills spanning education, criminal justice, business and health care. Lawmakers face an Aug. 31 deadline to pass legislation to Newsom.

Democratic Assemblywoman Lori Wilson, the chair of the Black Caucus, called the funding a “win” following the budget agreement announcement.

“In these types of environments, Black folks tend to get overlooked,” Woodson said. “But, we were glad to see that there was this down payment made toward reparations.”

Still, Woodson said the funding should be the start of “many rounds of investment to repair harm.”

“Our position has always been that the harm caused was not done overnight, and so the solutions and the investments won’t happen overnight as well,” he said.

The efforts around reparations have gained momentum in recent years, particularly in California. It became the first state in the country to form a reparations task force in 2021. Last year, the task force approved a multi-year study with more than 100 recommendations for how to undo the centuries of racism toward Black people in California.

Even then, Ward said, California still has a while to go and should “do better.”

None of the caucus’ endorsed reparation bills involve cash payments to descendants to enslaved people. And in Ward’s opinion, $12 million is what should be paid to one individual.”

“When it comes to them actually putting their money where their mouth is, I think that they’re falling short,” he said.


July 1, 2024: California plans to spend up to $12 million on reparations legislation under a budget signed by Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, marking a milestone in the state’s efforts to atone for a legacy of racism and discrimination against Black Californians. (The Associated Press Via Microsoft Start)

The reparations funding in the $297.9 billion budget Newsom signed over the weekend does not specify what programs the money would go towards. Lawmakers are not considering widespread direct payments to Black Californians this year.

The state Legislature is weighing proposals to issue a formal apology for California’s role in perpetuating discrimination against Black residents, to create an agency to administer reparations programs, and to identify families whose property was unjustly seized through eminent domain.

The funding comes after the federal reparations efforts have stalled for decades.

“We often say the budget is a reflection of our values and our priorities, so the fact that there’s any money for reparations should be a reason for celebrating,” said state Sen. Steven Bradford, a Los Angeles-area Democrat, noting he hoped the allocation would have been larger.

No state has gotten further along in its consideration of reparations proposals for Black residents than California, but some have made significant strides. Illinois and New York passed laws in recent years to study reparations proposals for African Americans. Florida passed a law in the 1990s creating a collage scholarship fund for descendants of Black residents who were killed in a 1923 massacre initiated by a white mob.

But some opponents of reparations proposals being considered by lawmakers in California say taxpayers should not have to pay to address policies and practices from a long time ago.

“Slavery was a stain on our nation’s history, but I don’t believe it’s fair to try to right the wrongs on the past at the expense of the people today who did nothing wrong,” Assembly Republican Leader James Gallagher said in a statement. “More than a quarter of Californians are immigrants — how can we look at those people, who are struggling as it is, and say it’s on them to make up for something that happened more than 150 years ago?”

Senate President Pro Tempore Mike McGuire, a Democrat, said at an event Monday that “the $12 million is not nearly enough” but that lawmakers worked closely to secure the money during a tough budget year.

It could cost that sate between $3 million and $5 million annually to run the reparations agency, according to an estimate reported by the Assembly Committee on Appropriations. The Legislature hasn’t released an estimated cost to implement the eminent domain bill, but the Senate Appropriations Committee said it could cost the state thousands of dollars to investigate claims by families who say their land was taken because of racially discriminatory motives.

Bradford introduced proposals to give property tax and housing assistance to descendants of enslaved Black people, but those were blocked in May by a key committee.

Kamillah Moore, who chaired a first-in-the-nation reparations task force, was disappointed that lawmakers did not introduce legislation this year to provide free tuition at public colleges for descendants of enslaved Black people, which the group recommended in its final report.

But Moore said it was still “good news” to see $12 million for reparations included in the budget as a starting point.

“It means that they’re taking responsibility, and they’re acknowledging the harms and the atrocities to this particular population,” she said. “That’s a huge step that should not be overlooked.”


July 3, 2024: The State of California has allocated $12 million for reparation bills, although how the money will be distributed is still unclear. (The Hill)

Gov. Gavin Newsom signed the state’s $297.9 billion budget over the weekend, but specifically around what programs would benefit from reparations money was lacking.

Lawmakers passed bills in May, sending them to the State Assembly. At the time, State Sen. Steven Bradford — an L.A.-area Democrat — said California “bears great responsibility for the past.

When will Black Californians be paid?

While Black Californians may be hoping for sweeping direct payments in 2024, that is not under consideration from lawmakers, according to The Associated Press.

After two years of study from the reparations task force — the first of its kind — on the ways in which California could atone for discrimination against African Americans, lawmakers decided against introducing a proposal for widespread payments to descendants of enslaved Black people.

What is under Consideration?

A formal apology for California’s discrimination against the Black community is still under deliberation by state legislature.

California’s legislative branch is also considering identifying Black families who had their homes unfairly seized from them through eminent domain.

An agency to administer reparation is also a possibility. An Assembly Committee on Appropriations estimate said it could cost California between $3 million to $5 million annually to operate.

What reparations weren’t included?

In addition to a lack of ubiquitous deposits, lawmakers also chose to leave out legislation that would offer free tuition to public colleges for those who descend from African Americans who were enslaved.

Despite efforts from state Sen. Steven Bradford — a Democrat — for housing and property tax assistance to be part of the reparations, lawmakers rebuked them in May.

What did Democrats and Republicans say?

Bradford was pleased with the outcome but added that he had higher hopes for the amount of money allocated.

“We often say the budget is a reflection of our values and our priorities, so that fact that there’s any money for reparations should be a reason for celebrating,” Bradford said.

Democratic Senate President Pro Temper Mike McGuire also felt the allocation was on the lower end.

“The $12 million is not nearly enough,” he remarked at a Monday event in the state.”

Gov. Newsom’s decision to sign off on the reparations budget was criticized, particularly by Assembly Republican Leader James Gallagher.

“Slavery was a stain on our nation’s history, but I don’t believe it’s fair to try and right the wrongs on the past at the expense of the people today who did nothing wrong,” Gallagher said in a statement.

“More than a quarter of Californians are immigrants — how can we look at those people, who are struggling as it is, and say it’s on them to make up for something that happened more than 150 years ago?”

Kamilah Moore, who was the chair of the reparations task force, was far more pleased with the outcome than Gallagher.

“It means that they’re taking accountability and responsibility, and they’re acknowledging the harms and the atrocities to this particular population,” Moore said. “That’s a huge step that should not be overlooked.”


July 3, 2024: In California’s new state budget, signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom (D), over the weekend, $12 million has been allocated for reparations bills. (Via Microsoft Start)

While the money was allocated within the state’s $297.9 billion budget, it is not made clear what the funds will be used for or how it will be dealt out.

According to a report from the Associated Press, some programs are not being considered by lawmakers, like direct payments made directly to Black Californians.

The state’s reparations task force is continuing to study how California could atone for discrimination against African Americans. As of now, no decision has been made, but several possibilities are being discussed.

One option no longer on the table is a proposal that would have seen widespread payments to descendants of enslaved Black people.

After backlash for the payment proposal, state lawmakers are working to find an agreeable answer for how to issue reparations, including a formal apology for California’s discrimination against the Black community.

California’s legislative branch is discussing the possibility of identifying Black families who had their homes unfairly seized through eminent domain.

The state is also considering creating an agency to administer reparations, though the Assembly Committee on Appropriations estimated it would cost as much a $5 million to operate annually.

Another option that was floated in May but has since been thrown aside was offering free tuition to public colleges for those who are descendants of enslaved African Americans.

Several of the ideas brought forth by state Sen. Steven Bradford (D) were shot down. Still, he is working to find an answer after the money was allocated.

“We often say the budget is a reflection and our priorities, so that fact that there’s any money for reparations should be a reason for celebrating,” Bradford shared with The Hill.

However, not all of his Democratic colleagues feel the same, as Senate President Pro Tempore Mike McGuire shared at a state event on Monday that the “$12 million is not nearly enough.”


September 1, 2024: Protest erupts at California state Capitol because of stalled reparations (KCRA 3)

A group of supporters of reparations for the descendants of enslaved Black Americans spent all afternoon inside the Capitol to protest the California Legislative Black Caucus’ plan to not move forward with two reparations-related proposals.

The two bills are SB 1403 and SB 1331. SB 1403 would establish a reparations-related state agency that would oversee the states efforts on the issue while also determining who is eligible for benefits. SB 1331 would create a new state fund for reparations.

The California Legislative Black Caucus released a statement on Saturday afternoon confirming neither bill would move forward before Saturday’s midnight deadline, the end of the state’s legislative session. Both bills were awaiting votes in the state Assembly.

Lawmakers within the California Legislative Black Caucus gave conflicting accounts as to why. State Sen. Steven Bradford told reporters that Gov. Gavin Newsom’s office expressed concerns with SB 1403 and proposed amendments the would have turned the measure into a study. KCRA 3 reviewed the proposed changes in writing that would have provided $6 million to California State University to research and review the recommendations made by the state’s Reparations Task Force. Bradford would not accept the governor’s changes.

“We’re at the finish line and I think we as the Black caucus owe it to the descendants of chattel slavery, we owe it to black Californians and Black Americans to move this legislation forward an get it to the governor’s desk,” Bradford told reporters.

When asked why he thought the legislation was stalling, Bradford said, “a fear of the veto.”

Bradford said both bills, as is, had the votes to clear the Assembly.

But Assemblymember Lori Wilson, the chairwoman of the Black caucus, denied that the office had requested the changes and others had issues with the bill but did not get specific. She said the bills did not have the votes. She declined to do an on-camera interview with KCRA 3 on Saturday.

In a written statement, the Black caucus said in part, “The caucus was unable to participate in the legislative process collectively and only recently became aware of the concerns and issues with the bill.”

Both bills are in the final stages of the legislative process, having cleared numerous hurdles at the state capitol, including committees that assess a proposal’s cost to taxpayers. As California grapples with a budget deficit, state lawmakers and the governor agreed to earmark $12 million to implement reparations-related legislation this year.

Newsom’s office would not comment on the two bills specifically on Saturday, but said his office had been working with the caucus on the reparations bill package.

The development has angered supporters who showed up at the Capitol Saturday afternoon the rally for proposals.

“They’re killing the bills because they’re scared of the governor,” said Chris Lodgson, an organizer with the Coalition for a Just and Equitable California. Lodgson blamed the Black caucus for not brining the bills to the Assembly floor.

“We’ve got the money,” Lodgson said, pushing back on claims the state has been strapped for cash and could only provide a limited amount to the cause this year. “Do we have the will? Do we have the courage?”

With hours left in the state’s legislative session, the group crowded the rotunda on the second floor outside of the Assembly chamber. As lawmakers made trips to the bathroom or nearby lounge, the group yelled down the hallway, urging them to bring the bills up for a vote.

Republican Assemblyman Bill Essayli on Saturday night tried to force a vote on SB 1331, but the effort was unsuccessful. The Assembly put the bills on the inactive file at around 9 p.m. State Sen. Bradford said he did not ask the house to do that.


September 6, 2024: Reparations supporters plot comeback after bitter defeat in California Legislature (Cal Matters)

Still grappling with the fallout from the defeat of two bills in the Legislature’s final hours, backers of reparations geared up for a grinding fight they said could last a decade and debated whether new divisions amongst them are best resolved through reconciliation or open political warfare.

Some supporters of the bills, which would have established a fund and an agency to administer reparations in California, are even promising payback, possibly by campaigning to recall legislators who blocked the bills.

The defeat of the legislation caused a deep schism between the reparations advocates who backed the bills, and the California Legislative Black Caucus, which wants to take a more incremental approach and successfully kept those bills from coming to a vote on the Assembly floor.

The caucus prioritized 14 other pieces of legislation, drawing on the recommendations of a state reparations task force. Many based the Legislature and are headed to the governor’s desk. Caucus leaders pointed to the package as a concrete achievement; it includes one bill that establishes a process to restore property to victims of racially motivated eminent domain.

Political experts say California’s Democrats are walking a balance beam: trying to advance reparations policies far enough to appeal advocates and Black voters, but not so far as to incur potential voter blowback.

Tatishe Nteta, professor of political science at at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, directed a 2021 national poll that found 67% of those surveyed were opposed to the federal government providing cash payments to descendants of enslaved people. A more recent poll put the number at 61%. Nteta called cash payments consistently and “uniquely unpopular,” though public opinion is slowly shifting toward more support for reparations.

“Until the (reparations) movement itself can agree upon what a reparations program should look like, you’re not going to see any entrepreneurial member of the Legislature, who is outside of that movement, make a case or a claim, or use their own political capital on what is a holistically unpopular policy,” Nteta said.

Nteta said support for reparations policies broadens when cash is taken off the table. Other equity measures approved by the Legislature this year do not involve cash, including one that would require the state to apologize for its role in perpetuating harm against Black Californians, and one aimed at eliminating hair discrimination in competitive sports.

Advocates for monetary reparations framed the defeat of their bills as subverting the work of the California Reparations Task Force, which last year issued a 1,000-page document and more than 200 recommendations following two years of public hearings.

The defeated bills came via Inglewood Democrat Stephen Bradford who, in his final term as a state senator, introduced the legislation independently from the 14-bill priority package advanced by the California Legislative Black Caucus. Despite dozens of protestors showing up in person and calling for a vote, the Black Caucus and Democrats refused to call Bradford’s bills to the Assembly floor on Saturday.

“I think it’s going to send a bad message across the country that a state as progressive as California didn’t have the votes, so to speak, on a bill that pretty much had been run through all the traps,” said Bradford, noting that his bills made it through the Senate, and Assembly committees, with little or no change. In May, all the members of the Black Caucus signed on as co-authors, he said.

Backers framed the defeat as a gut punch for organizers who have worked for years to advance reparations in California. It was also perhaps a glimpse at deeper-seated problems for complex racial justice movements, even in a state dominated by Democrats who need the support of Black votes.

Whispers began circulating the Wednesday before the session’s finale. “It was minutes away from coming up on the agenda, and we have everybody up there; we’re so excited,” said Chris Lodgson, an organizer for Coalition for a Just and Equitable California, who has been working with state lawmakers on reparations since 2019.

“And then I turn around, and I see some of Bradford’s staff came up to the third floor, and I could see it in their eyes. I could see it in their faces. “We got a problem,” he recounted.

California’s groundbreaking efforts on reparations have reverberated across the nation, with several states and cities following its lead. Now, days after a defeat, emotions are still raw as lawmakers and advocates consider where to go from here.

“The trust is completely broken between the Black Caucus and reparations organizers,” said Kamaliah Moore, the chair of the state’s landmark reparations task force.

Some advocates are vowing revenge and considering trying to recall Black caucus members. They plan on showing up at town hall meeting in some of the legislators’ districts, and at least one groups has filed an ethics complaint with the special committee on legislative ethics against the caucus. The complaint alleges corruption and improper influence played a role in the bills’ fate.

“There has to be a political price to pay,” said Lodgson. “I don’t know if these people can remain in office. To be honest, I don’t think this people can remain in office.”

Those are threats that Bradford says are “totally unnecessary.”

“That’s wasted energy. We should find a way to work in a constructive manner,” he said earlier this week.

Still, people are hurt and angry.

“This hurts in a different way because of what we saw was our own people stop our own people. That hits different,” said Lodgson.

Assemblymember Tina McKinnon, a Democrat from Inglewood, said her family had traced their genealogy, and she is the descendant of people enslaved in the United Stats.

“I am fully supportive of reparations for descendants of enslaved people,” she said. “It hurt me too. I know they were hurt.”

Assemblymember Lori Wilson, the chair of California’s Legislative Black Caucus, said turning a state task force’s recommendations into concrete policies was always going to be a multi-year effort. It was well-known that some bills would take several legislative sessions to reach the finish line, she said.

“(The Black Caucus) is absolutely committed to the recommendations that have come out of the task force, and to getting those across the finish line,” Wilson said on Saturday, adding that Bradford’s bills would be reintroduced next year.

A state task force last year recommended up to $1.2 million in payments per eligible Black resident for racial harms perpetrated by the Golden State, such as lower life expectancies, excessive policing, housing discrimination, lost business opportunities, and land seized by racially motivated eminent domain.

On a national level, conservatives pounced on the dollar figure as evidence of left-wing excess.

The task force debated various forms for allocating reparations, such as tuition or housing grants, but it finally voted for direct payments to compensate for economic inequality. According to the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, the typical Black family in American is worth $23,000, compared to $184,000 for the average white family. About 6.5% of California’s population is Black.

McKinnon said the Black Caucus plans on eventually passing legislation that follows all the task force’s recommendations.

“We have a plan,” she said. “A five- to ten-year plan. We plan on doing all the recommendations. Not one. We’re trying to close the wealth gap.”

Gov. Gavin Newsom signed the law creating the task force in 2020, and he set said $12 million this year from the state’s cash-strapped budget to implement new measures. But he’s been evasive about any actual dollar figures he’d be willing to allocate to eligible Black Californians, repeating that reparations are “about much more than cash payments.”

Newsom said Friday that members of the Black Caucus are owed an apology for the reaction from reparations advocates.

“The members of the Black Caucus did not deserve to be attacked in their integrity … that was disgraceful. There are members of the Black Caucus that are owed an apology,” Newsom said…


September 12, 2024: First-in-the-nation reparations bills are headed to Newsom’s desk, but not without some tension (CapRadio)

It’s a hot morning on the Capitol lawn just days after the end of the legislative session, and several advocacy groups that represent people who have been incarcerated are kicking off their next big push: A campaign for a November ballot measure.

“Slavery is inconsistent with California’s values,”Carmen-Nicole Cox with the ACLU California Action said to the crowd from a podium. “And even still, slavery is alive and well in detention and penal facilities across our great state.”

She was speaking at a rally in favor of Proposition 6, which would end forced labor in state prisons. It was part of a successful suite of reparations bills.

Two failed bills that would’ve helped advance the state’s reparations plan are also grabbing attention, and Cox said voters are watching.

“We absolutely vote people in because we believe that they are going to advance certain policy, and then when they show us they won’t, we get to vote again,” she said.

California might soon make some of the first steps in the country towards reparations for descendants of enslaved persons. Lawmakers know the stakes are high for their own state and the nation, but not everyone agrees on how to get there.

The state responded to protests and calls for racial justice in 2020 with a reparations task force. Last year, that group came back with an over 1,000-page report.

Secretary of State Shirley Weber initiated that work. She told reporters when the report came out that she believes California could make moves that other states — and even federal government — can’t.

“This effort had been tried many times at the federal level, but because of the complexity of the politics of this nation and its resistance to any kind of change or activity with regards to African Americans, it had failed many times,” she said.

The California Legislative Black Caucus releases a list of priority bills based on the report back in January.

Assembly member Corey Jackson (D-Riverside) is a member of the Black Caucus and says he’s proud of ow many of those bills succeeded.

“For the first time in the nation, we have a series of bills going to the governor’s desk that provides reparations for African Americans,” he said.

Eight of the 14 bills passed. One calls for the state to make an official apology for its role in slavery. Another mandates it investigate claims of stolen property via eminent domain.

The bills touch on a lot of things, including education, health and criminal justice. Jackson said that might not be what people expect — the package doesn’t include direct cash payments. But it is in line with the steps that the task force laid out. Those are based on a United Nations legal framework and research on several reparations efforts from around the world.

“The first one is to acknowledge that a harm has been done. The second is to apologize for that harm,” he said.

He says these bills put those ideas in motion, and that’s a big win. But there is tension in what passed and what didn’t.

Two bills that were introduced later failed at the last minute. One, Senate Bill 1403, would have established a new government department to carry out reparations laws and another, Senate Bill 1331, would create a reparations fund, but not with money from the state.

Jackson said that although those steps are in the report, the caucus wanted to move more gradually.

State Senator Stephen Bradford (D-Gardena) is also a member of the Black Caucus and one of two lawmakers who served on the task force. He sponsored both bills.

“I think they were critically important to the overall movement of reparations and being able to do something concrete right now,” he said.

The bills enjoyed broad support in votes on the state senate and assembly floors. The entire Black Caucus even co-sponsored one — SB 1403. But both were pulled on the last night of the legislative session.

Caucus members have given various explanation as to why. Caucus Chair Lori Wilson told reporters that evening that the bills weren’t ready, and added that the funding for them, especially the new department, wasn’t there, considering its a tight year for the state budget.

Bradford said Governor Gavin Newsom’s office approached the caucus with amendments to SB 1403 in the last week of the session. The governor’s team refused to comment on the bills or confirm that it had suggested any changes.

A few dozen protestors, largely from reparations advocacy groups, gathered to protest in the rotunda of the Capitol as the bills were scrapped. Their voices carried to the Assembly floor throughout the night, though they were not allowed into the gallery.

Bradford also said he hears from lawmakers in other states who are looking to California as a model.

“There are going to be those critics who are already talking that say ‘Hey, a state as so-called Progressive as California can’t get it done. How are you going to get it done in some of the more conservative states?” he said.

It’s his last year in the Senate, and Bradford said he wants to lave a workable roadmap behind.


September 26, 2024: Newsom deals wins and blows to California reparations effort (Yahoo! News)

California Gov. Gavin Newsom dealt both wins and losses to legislation linked to the state’s groundbreaking reparations efforts on Wednesday.

Among the wins was his signing of Assembly Bill 3089, which will issue a formal apology from the state of California for “all the harms and atrocities committed by the state” for perpetuating racial discrimination through chattel slavery, segregation, unequal disbursal of government funding and more.

This bill “declares that such actions shall not be repeated” and “commits to restore and repair affected people’s with actions beyond this apology.”

Newsom also signed Senate Bill 1089, which will address food and health inequities by requiring advance notification if a grocery store or pharmacy is closing in an underserved or at-risk community.

However, he vetoed Senate Bill 1050, a bill that would have restored property taken under racially-motivated uses of eminent domain to is original owners or provide another remedy, such as restitution or compensation.

“I thank the author for his commitment to redressing past racial injustices,” Newsom said in a statement, referring to state Sen. Stephen Bradford. “However, this bill tasks a nonexistent state agency to carry out its various provisions and requirements, making it impossible to implement.”

The agency that would have carried out the policy would have been created if Senate Bill 1403 passed the legislature. The bill, also introduced by Bradford, was intended to create an agency to carry out the recommendations of the state’s groundbreaking first-in-the-nation Task Force to Study and Develop Reparation Proposals for African Americans.

It failed following last-minute changes from the Newsom administration that instead aimed to support further research on reparations in the state instead of creating the agency to carry out reparations recommendations from the state task force, according to local news outlet CalMatters.

Newsom also vetoed Assembly Bill 1975, which was aimed at making “medically supportive” food and nutrition interventions as part of Medi-Cal benefits in the state.

He signed several other bills aimed at addressing racial inequality in the state, including:

Assembly Bill 1986, which requires the Office of the Inspector General to promote access to literature for incarcerated people by posting a list of banned books in state prisons.

Assembly Bill 2319, which requires the Attorney General to enforce compliance with anti-bias training for perinatal healthcare workers.

Assembly Bill 1815, which adjusts the definition of “race” to strengthen discrimination protections by including traits associated with race, such as hair texture.

On Sept. 22, he signed Assembly Bill 3131, which requires the state department of education to prioritize funding for socioeconomically disadvantaged communities, in Sept. 22.

This bill would require the department, in consultation wit the executive director of the State Board of Education, when determining grant recipients for the California Career Technical Education Incentive Grant Program, to first give priority to consideration to applicants in historically redlined communities, as determined by the department. The same would apply to the K-12 Selection Committees, when determining grant recipients under the K-12 component of the Strong Workforce Program.

The California Legislative Black Caucus aimed to create legislation that would capture the many forms that reparations can take, according to Assemblywoman Lori D. Wilson, the caucus’s chair.

“While many only associate direct cash payments with reparations, the true meaning of the word, to repair, involves much more,” said Wilson in the introduction of the reparations legislative package.

She noted that the package addressed the need for “a comprehensive approach to dismantling the legacy of slavery and systemic racism.”

The legislative package was born out of California’s first-in-the-nation state-backed task force that found he state and various arms of its government played an active role in perpetuating systemic racism against Black Californians through discrimination in housing, education and employment.

Several other bills from the California Legislative Black Caucus’ 14-bill reparations package failed to make it through the legislature.

The bills failed to make it through the legislature included bans on involuntary servitude and solitary confinement in state detention facilities, funding of violence reductions programs, and funding “for the purpose of increasing the life expectancy of, improving educational outcomes for, or lifting people out of poverty specific groups.


September 30, 2024: California touted reparations push, but advocates new policies fall short (NBC News)

California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a handful of bills on Thursday that stemmed from a yearlong effort to issue lineage-based reparations for the state’s Black residents and their descendants. Members of the California Legislative Black Caucus heralded his signature on four bills, including an apology for the state’s role in promoting slavery.

But some advocates — and at least one lawmaker — said the bills do not go far enough to address the generational disparities that slavery inflicted upon Black people.

Sen. Stephen A. Bradford was a member of the California Reparations Task Force, which published a sweeping list of recommendations for policies and programs to holistically address the social and financial wrongs of slavery and racial discrimination.

One of his own bills, which would have set up a process for the restitution of land taken through racist tactics, was the only bill in a separate reparations package to make it past the Legislature.

It passed with bipartisan support in California and Assembly, but was vetoed by Newsom on Wednesday.

In his remarks, Newsom said the bill could not function without the accompanying Freedman’s Affairs Agency, which would have been established by another one of Bradford’s bills. Bradford said the Black Caucus blocked that bill from reaching the floor for a vote. “We had enough votes and were at the finish line,” he said in a statement.

Advocates hoping for more ambitious laws to provide a more substantial investment in reparations were sorely disappointed.

The measures passed by the Legislature and signed into law by Newsom, which ranged from banning discrimination based on natural and protective hairstyles, to reviewing the list of books banned in prisons, are closer to “racial equity measures,” said Kamaliah Moore, a lawyer and the chair of the Reparations Task Force. The policies notably did not require hefty price tags.

Bradford’s bills “represented the strongest recommendations in the report,” she said. They “aligned with the true essence of reparations.”

The task force met from June 2021 to June 2023, conducting research, collecting testimony and ultimately releasing a report with more than 100 policy recommendations to be considered by the governor and the Legislature.

Among these recommendations were the repeal of Proposition 209, a 1996 law banning affirmative action in public agencies, as well as abolishing the death penalty and increasing funding to schools to address racial disparities.

All together, the task force’s recommendations would carry a price tag in the hundreds of billions of dollars. Newsom, who said he had “devoured” the report and had expressed support for reparations generally, set aside $12 million in the state budget to implement any successful measures.

But given California’s multiyear budget deficit, lawmaker expressed concern about the cost of any policies heading to his desk. Bradford said the caucus blocked his bills because they were worried about a potential veto. Newsom’s office did not respond to requests for comment.

The Black Caucus chair, Assemblymember Lori Wilson, said the caucus had concerns about the bills “from the beginning” and that “the governor’s concerns were no surprise to us.”

She declined to comment on what specifically the other concerns were, arguing that any changes would be clear when the legislation would be reintroduced in the next session.

The centerpiece of Bradford’s reparations package was the Freedmen Affairs Agency, which would have overseen state reparations initiative. The agency was estimated to cost between $3 million and $5 million to run annually, according to a government report.

In the final week of September, at the close of the state legislative session, two dueling reparations packages were expected to be brought to a vote: Bradford’s three bills and six presented by the Black Caucus.

The governor’s office sent a series of substantial edits to Bradford on Sept. 23, which would have replaced the Freedmen Affairs Agency with a research program run out of the state university system.

Bradford rejected the proposed amendments, thinking he still had support of his colleagues in the Black Caucus who were supposed to bring his bills to a vote.

By the end of the week, it was clear that members of the caucus had changed their minds and decided to block two of Bradford’s bills, even though they likely had enough support to pass.

By the final hours of the legislative session, dozens of protesters had gathered in the lobby of the Capitol to support Bradford’s bills.

One of these people was Moore, the task force chair, who had driven up to Sacramento from Los Angeles with 20 other people that day. She wanted to show up in person to voice her support for Bradford’s bills. “I wanted to see the process all the way though,” she said.

Organizer Chris Lodgson was another community leader who went to the Capitol to lobby for Bradford’s bills. Lodgson works with a descendant-led organization called the Coalition for Just and Equitable California, or CJEC, which ran community education and feedback sessions on behalf of the task force throughout the state.

“To say we are extremely disappointed is an understatement,” he said. “We felt betrayed by our caucus members.”

Last week, Bradford said he had been responding to concerns from a wider community of pro-reparations politicians, including those in the Congressional Black Caucus in Washington, D.C.

National, state and local legislators who had been looking to California as a blueprint for passing progressive reparations legislation were disappointed, Bradford said.

As 16 municipalities, New York state and Illinois develop reparations proposals, California’s task force member have been in touch with a wide network of legislators working on reparations.

Legislators are also discussing the fate of H.R. 40, federal legislation that would establish a commission to study the history of slavery and develop reparations, and the question of who will reintroduce it after the death of U.S. Rep. Shelia Jackson Lee this summer.

“It’s not just about California,” he said. “It’s about the rest of the nation.”


October 4, 2024: Apology but no cash payments: California reparations for slavery start incrementally (The Christian Science Monitor)

When a California Reparations Task Force released a thousand-page report last year addressing the effects of systemic racism on Black residents, it made headlines with ambitious and comprehensive recommendations, including reforms at every level of government and cash payments with an eye-popping price tag.

Now, acting on the recommended framework, California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a package of reparations legislation, including a formal apology to African Americans for the state’s role in perpetuating slavery and is legacy — and budgeted up to $12 million to pay for it.

State lawmakers touted the handful of bills as significant milestones, but the bills disappointed advocates who had been calling for more aggressive action. The efforts amount to a small fraction of what would have been needed for cash payments to descendants of slavery or for other forms of monetary redress, like subsidies for education or homeownership.

Still, California’s effort to mend harms endured by generations of Black Americans as a result of slavery and institutionalized racism is considered a model for the rest of the nation.

“Everyone is looking to California to lead, looking to California to understand what obstacles might be ahead of us, looking for how community and institutions work together and wrap around in this process of reparations,” says Robin Rue Simmons, founder of FirstRepair, an organization leading reparations discussions across the country.

But those hoping to capture momentum around last year’s recommendations say lawmakers missed an important opportunity.

“I think that was a good start,” says state Sen. Stephen Bradford, vice chair of California’s Legislative Black Caucus, who said on the reparations task force. “But I think we could have really done more, especially at this time. And, you know, the urgency of now was here.”

A National Model

Out of 14 bills proposed by the Legislative Black Caucus at the beginning of the year, eight made it to law at the end of September.

The marquee law is the bipartisan apology. California joins several other states, including Florida, Virginia and Alabama, which have also issued apologies. Other laws include:

Requiring grocery stores and pharmacies to notify their communities of any plans to shutter or change ownership. This law is aimed at combatting “food deserts” by protecting access to healthy foods through community-based grocery stores.

Updating the state’s Civil Rights Act, making it a violation to discriminate on the basis of any traits associated with race, including hair texture and style.

Procedures to enforce laws that require implicit bias training for health care workers, as a way of supporting better maternal health in marginalized communities.

Creating a designation for California Black-Serving Institutions at state universities that indicates they will provide extra support for Black students, who historically have disproportionately lacked access to education.

Requiring a program that provides grants to students at career technical colleges to report race and gender data to the state department of education as a form of accountability.

Making it more difficult for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to ban books available to incarcerated people by posting its list of banned books online and making public notifications of any changes to that list.

Preventing counties from repurposing federal benefits owed to children in the foster system and putting it toward the cost of their care.

California voters will decide a ballot measure in November that would eliminate involuntary servitude, which is still on the books in California, allowing its use for incarcerated people. Missing from the slate: the creation of a California Reparations Fund to establish permanent financial support for ongoing redress, and a new state agency responsible for determining claims and distributing funds. Both were recommended by the reparations task force, and would be central to implementing harm-based monetary awards.

Direct payment is essential for meaningful repair, says Chris Logdson, lead organizer with the Coalition for a Just and Equitable California. “Nothing works without the return of our economic wealth,” he says. “As a matter of fact, some things will hurt if they don’t have the monetary piece to it. So compensation is at the core of it.”

Mr. Lodson also noted that he was “pleasantly surprised” by “near unanimous support for all of the most meaningful pieces of legislation that were advancing this year.”

And, echoes Ms. Rue Simmons: “I’m hearing much more about unity [in California]. We see that some of the bills have passed. Others, we believe will have success eventually … I’m encouraged.”

Civil rights advocates across the country are watching. Some will call California’s actions historic, says Raymond Winbush, director of the Institute for Urban Research at Morgan State University in Baltimore. He sits on Baltimore’s reparations commission and testified before California’s task force – and calls the legislative reforms good but weak.

“It’s not bad,” he says “but it’s not complete reparations, which would be more comprehensive, and [would mean] that each Black California would receive some form of historical justice through repair.”

‘Transformative’ steps

Before California, there was Evanston, Illinois. The city north of Chicago, on the shore of Lake Michigan, passed its own reparations law in 2019 – the first of its kind in the nation. Repair in Evanston takes the form of housing subsidies: $25,000 to Black residents who suffered from discriminatory housing policies between 1919 and 1969 and their direct descendants. The funding can go toward homeownership, home improvement, or mortgage assistance.

Repair must be tangible in order to be meaningful, says Ms. Rue Simmons, who as an Evanston alderman, led passage of Evanston’s reparations law.

“We as Black communities and our allies are really looking for impact, change, for our quality of lives to be improved, to feel safe, including and so on,” she says. “That will happen with tangible forms of reparations.”

Ms. Rue Simmons, who is also a commissioner on the National African American Reparations Commission, calls California’s steps transformative for the reparations conversation — especially as other states and cities begin to take up their own work on the subject. That process is complex. Politics, infrastructure, and education all play a part. And it takes time.

“California’s a bellwether state,” says Dr. Winbush. “And you know, what happens there eventually happens in the rest of the country.”


November 1, 2024 ‘We have gone farther than any other state in our nation’: California lawmakers look ahead to year 2 of reparations work as voters decide on last related measure (CapRadio)

California passed the first state-level reparations laws in the country this year. Still, many of the most impactful pieces of the same package died or were vetoed.

The lawmakers responsible for it are taking stock of what they learned as they make plans for next year, while people outside of the state are considering what this means for their own work.

And everyone’s watching to see if voters will pass the last piece of this year’s work, Proposition 6. If passed by voters this month, it would ban involuntary servitude as a punishment for crime from the state’s constitution, a move that would affect forced prison labor.

“We have gone farther than any other state in our nation,” said Lori Wilson, the outgoing chair of the California Legislature Black Caucus. She said she’s proud of what they did this year.

Five bills from the caucus’s reparations package were signed into law, including measures that call for the state to make an official apology for slavery, curb discrimination of natural hairstyles in sports, and publish information on detention facilities book bans. Direct cash payments were never on the table for this year, but are part of a long-term plan for the caucus.

“It was really exciting, and it was mixed in some ways because we had a little bit of a community backlash,” Wilson said.

Governor Gavin Newsom is a proponent of reparations. Still, he vetoed some of the bills, saying they weren’t ready or too costly. Others died in the legislature.

Senator Steven Bradford from the Los Angels area is a member of the caucus, and he addressed some bills that didn’t make it. One addressed race-based use of eminent domain. Another one would have created a department to implement the new laws.

California’s budget includes $12 million for undefined reparations work this year. Bradford admits it’s not much — but he counts that money as a win.

But the lawmaker also says the effort should’ve had more teeth.

“We had great momentum until the last week of session for the real substantive stuff to really help stand up reparations,” he said.

Some organizers in the state agree with him — several dozen protestors crowded the rotunda of the state Capitol on the last day of the legislative session in August to push back as legislators killed some of those bills.

Camen-Nicole Cox with the ACLU California Action expressed her frustration at a rally for Proposition 6.

“We absolutely vote people in because we believe that they are going to advance certain policy, and then when they show us that they won’t, we get to vote again,” she said.

With California taking the lead on these novel laws, people outside the state are doing similar work are watching closely. Some say the setbacks showed that getting the most impactful policies through is going to take a while.

“It is disappointing, and it is a really important, courageous start,” said Aria Florant, co-founder of Liberation Ventures, which tracks the progress of dozens of reparations efforts nationwide.

She was hoping to see California set a high president, but knew the likelihood of it passing posts of heavy-hitting legislation in one year was low.

Her organization partnered with researchers at Princeton University on a poll gaging support for reparations in the U.S. Most Americans still don’t support them, and only 11% think direct cash payments will ever happen.

“Every movement — it doesn’t always move in a linear fashion, right?” Florant said.

Still, they found that support has doubled for reparations over the last two decades. Additionally, when they surveyed people about individual aspects of reparations, they responded much more positively. For example, over 60% said they support criminal justice reform, education about slavery and investment in Black communities — all common aspects of reparations work.

Assembly Member Corey Jackson is also a member of the caucus, and he says a lot of people aren’t even on the same page about reparations should look like.

“If you even look at your own family, right, and you try to make a decision — everybody ain’t going to agree,” he said.

He said some of the setbacks, including Newsom’s veto on creating a state agency to implement reparations laws, are going into their planning for next year.

“We realized that we needed to do a lot of work ahead of time,” he said. “Not just relying on the legislative process to help get it done.”

He also said his priority was to teach people about the model of reparations the caucus is looking to — which eventually includes cash payments, but starts with acknowledgment and an apology.

On Election Day, California voters will deiced if that also means ending forced labor in prisons under Proposition 6, the caucus’ last remaining reparations proposal, at least for this year.


December 4, 2024: Sacramento leaders pass resolutions on repartitions and racial equity. “Beacon of Light” (The Sacramento Bee)

Sacramento leaders approved two historic resolutions on Tuesday to continue the city’s efforts toward reparations and racial equity.

The council unanimously passed both items, despite controversy last month that led to a delay in the vote. Councilmember Mai Vang — along with community organizations and residents — had raised concerns of “major changes” by City Manager Howard Chan’s office.

At Tuesday’s meeting, Chan pulled his revised version of the resolution.

“Moving forward, our actions in this resolution have to be different if we want to address inequities and protect Sacramento,” Vang said.

The first passed resolution centered around racial equity and the city’s yearslong efforts to acknowledge its history of systemic racism. Per the resolution, the city would implement several new initiatives, including an annual assessment report of the diversity and equity department and advance the development of a Racial Equity Action Plan by 2026.

These efforts will embed racial equity within the city culture and center community narratives, according to members of the Racial Equity Alliance and Racial Equity Council. These two groups, made up of Sacramento residents, spearheaded the resolution.

“All of our residents, no matter our race or ethnicity, deserve fair chances to live, work and play with dignity and respect, to be protected free from discrimination and hate,” said Kao Ye Thao, a member of the Racial Equity Council.

Ye Thao was among the more than 20 community members who provided public comments in favor of the equity resolution. They spoke of its long overdue passing to dismantle racism and the nationwide importance of such a move.

“I seriously believe that Sacramento can be a beacon of light and hope for the rest of this country,” said DeAngelo Mack, another member of the Racial Equity Alliance.

The second passed resolution was a multi-year effort led by Mayor Darrell Steinberg — whose term ends this month. Under the resolution approved Tuesday, Sacramento will continue its work on reparations by transitioning it from a mayoral initiative to a citywide initiative.

“I want to thank you all today for beginning the process of doing what should have been done in 1865 and certain should have been done in 1965,” said recent mayoral candidate Flojaune Cofer. “We make it more complicated the longer we wait.”

The efforts for such an initiative began in 2021, when Steinberg joined other mayors to create a coalition committed to researching harms inflected on Black residents. In the years since, Steinberg’s office secured grants for graduate students to identify policies of discrimination in the city’s history and researchers reparations programs in other cities across the country.

“I’m so glad this initiative will continue citywide,” Steinberg said “It’s appropriate.”

Earlier this year, California Legislative Black Caucus help passed a priority list of reparation bills.

Tuesday’s meeting also marked the last meetings for council members Katie Valenzuela and Shoun Thao. Mayor-elect Kevin McCarthy will be sworn in next Tuesday along with two new council members, Roger Dickinson and Phil Plukebaum.


Posted in CaliforniaTagged ,